Stacking the SGE2010-G5

When stacking theSGE2010-G5 do you use Mini-SFP ports, the 10//100/1000 ports or is there a Stacking module for the miniSFP ports?
Thanks,
John

Hi conlon, when looking at the switch, you will observe there are combo ports. Ports 24 and 48 are paired with SFP ports. You may use the ethernet ports or sfp ports but not both.
-Tom
Please rate helpful posts

Similar Messages

Where does Lightroom put HDR in the grid view? Is there anyway to have Lightroom stack the HDR file with the source files?

I can't decipher where (and why) the program is putting the HDR image in the grid. I stack all of my HDR source images so they are easy to track and manage. Other apps/plugins allow you to stack resulting images with their source image. That would be great if there's a way to set that in LR preferences.

Thanks, but this doesn't really answer the question about stacking the HDR file with the source files. Yes, it does put the file in the same folder, however many of my folders have 100s of images (that often look similar) and as far as I can tell, LR places them randomly in the sort order. It doesn't appear to put them at the beginning or end of the sort (usually by date), but somewhere randomly in the middle. Even if it could be made clear what method it is using to sort them, that would help locate one file among hundreds.
Ideally, however it should allow you to stack with the stacked source files. Is there anyway to do this? If not, is it a feature that could be requested?

Stacks the hard way

HI
for this prblem i have to make a stack, but i have to program the stack the hard way and cant use any java predetermined stack things so here goes my problem.
I ahve been given this node class
public class Node {
public String data;
public Node next;
public Node(String tag, Node rest) {
data = tag;
next = rest;
} // end of constructor
} // end of class Node
no in the main body of program would it work as a stack if i did the following:
public class Stacking {
private Node top;
public Stacking() {
top = null;
public void pushTag(String startTag) throws TagError {
if(top==null){
top = new Node(StartTag,null)
else {
top.next=new Node(top,null);
top.data = startTag;
many thanks for any help that you can give me

Here's something to get you started:public class Stack {
    private Node top;
    public Stack () {
        top = null;
    public void push (Object element) {
        top = new Node (element, top);
    public Object pop () { // throws EmptyStackException
        Object element = top.getElement ();
        top = top.getNext ();
        return element;
    public Object peek () { // throws EmptyStackException
        return top.getElement ();
    private class Node {
        private Node next;
        private Object element;
        public Node (Object element, Node next) {
            this.element = element;
            this.next = next;
        public Object getElement () {
            return element;
        public Node getNext () {
            return next;
public class Test {
    public static void main (String[] parameters) {
        Stack stack = new Stack ();
        stack.push ("1");
        stack.push ("2");
        System.out.println (stack.pop ());
        System.out.println (stack.peek ());
        System.out.println (stack.pop ());
}You still need to build the exceptions yourself.
Kind regards,
  Levi

Stack the values in a series but not stack by series

Anyone have the idea on this:
stack the values in a series but not stack by series.
There is only 1 series in the chart and I want to stack all the values returned. No way to do this in apex?

hi all,
can apex support this chart? thanks.
http://www.anychart.com/products/anychart/gallery/sample_97.html

How to stack the photos?

Apparently I am doing something wrong, but I cannot stack the photos. In grid mode I select 2 or more photos, go to Photo - Stacking menu and all options in that menu are gray out. How to activate it??

Unfortunately, you can only stack when working directly in folders. If you're in a collection or browsing by keywords, it's not available.

HT4689 Can we make mission control not stack the windows of the same app?

I often have multiple Word windows open and it's very hard to find the one I need when they are stacked in Mission Control. I like the fact that with a four-finger swipe you can see all the open programs, but it's not quite useful if apps are stacked (so I can't find which is which), and minimized apps apps are not shown.
In comparison, MS Windows makes it easier to locate an open program although less fancy-looking.

Hi keclear,
If you would prefer that Mission Control not stack the open windows for each application, you may want to turn off the "Group windows by application" setting. You may find the following article helpful:
OS X Mountain Lion: Mission Control preferences
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH10850
Cheers,
- Brenden

Does the SGE2010 support 10gb Mini GBIC?

Hello,
I have one 48 port SGE2010 and one 24 port SGE2000P at separate sites that are connected with single-mode fiber. I was wondering if the SGE's will support 10gb Mini GBIC transceivers or only 1gb Mini GBIC transceivers? I would like to connect the two switches at 10gb.
Example transceiver:
https://www.cdw.com/shop/products/Proline-Cisco-SFP-10G-LR-Compatible-10GBase-LR-SMF-SFP-mini-GBIC-module/2146046.aspx
Thanks in advance!

Hello,
I have never actually seen a 2Gb connector, but even if you found one the SGE switches are only able to do 1Gb on it's ports. You may be able to configure a link aggregation between the two switches, but that really only gives you more bandwidth when there are lots of different hosts communicating over the link. I go over why this is in this post, starting with the second paragraph of my reply.
If you really would like a faster link the next step up is 10Gb. The SG500 switches can support a 5Gb link between them (although this still uses either the 10Gb stacking cable, or a 10Gb mini-GBIC), and the SG500X supports 10Gb fiber connections.
We also have recently come out with the SG500XG, which can do 10Gb on ethernet ports when you use Cat6A cable. I understand you may not be looking to upgrade just yet, so Link Aggregation is probably your best option with the switches you have now, but take a look at the post I linked first to see if it will really give you the improvement you are looking for.
Thank you for choosing Cisco,
Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer
Cisco Small Business Support Center
*please rate helpful posts*

I need to graph data and stack the plots to create 3 graphs, how do I plot more than 1 data line on each graph

I currently use a code heavy solution thats clunky and need to refine the graphing part. For simplicity I want to use the waveform chart and its "Stack Plots" option. However I cannot see how to collect 2 or 3 data streams and display them on 1 of the stacked plots.
The final verson will have 3 stacked plots, the top plots needs 3 data streams, The middle & bottom plots require 2 data streams.
Help Appreciated

Hi,
Sometimes the Synchronous Display option makes a difference (right
mouse>advanced>Synchronous Display). Or while running, right click>Smooth
Updates. Fiddle around with them, sometimes unexpected settings has the best
performance (only four combinations anyway).
Regards,
Wiebe.
"CB" wrote in message
news:50650000000500000005810100-1079395200000@exchange.ni.com...
> Dennis,
> Thanks for that, I had tried your solution earlier while developing
> the package. A bit dissapointing the stacked plots wont work. it'd
> save lots of code and simplify the whole graphing part of my package.
> I am reluctant to overlay transparent graphs etc on top of others
> because I am aware it could hinder performance, I am doing a lot in my
> pac
kage and need to get the most out of the machine. My current
> solution is nearly ok and consists of 3 waveform charts contained in a
> cluster. I need the 3 charts to line up accurately and be of identical
> size which involved plugging into the various sizing/xy line up params
> which was a bit fiddly. The main problem is the bottom graph seems to
> end up lagging at some point which gives doesnt look too good. When
> the PC gets loaded up with too much work its best effort means the
> bottom graph get missed out (or something like that) occasionally. I
> have noticed this on all the machines it has run on even my new 3Ghz
> machine.
> I am sure this could work ok but I cannot figure how to force the
> graphs to only continue once all 3 have their data.
> Thanks in advance, Regards, Chris

Connecting stacked switches (SGE2010)

Hi there,
This may seem like a basic question to many of you, but I'm finding it hard to discover any relevant information on the topic.
I have 4 SGE2010P switches stacked together:
What is the best way to create a faster link between the switches? I need more than 1Gbps across them, and I'm not sure of the best way to do this without risking a broadcast storm. I'd preferably like to be able to use some sort of LACP/Etherchannel between Switch 4 and any of the other switches.
Thanks in advance,
Ben.

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
If it's performance you seek, change your daisy chain topology to a star configuration, i.e. one switch has direct links to the other 3. If you really believe you need more bandwidth, if the switches support it, you could also make some or all the direct links Etherchannel links. (Insure your hashing algorithm, if configurable, is suitable for your traffic flows.)
Assuming your switches also support STP, for redundancy, in the star configuration, you can interconnect two of your leaf switches (and configure star root to be logical root).
BTW, neither a star topology, or your shown (redundant - physical ring) daisy chain topology have much to do with broadcast storms.

Stacks - the way it was supposed to be!

Hi All,
Just ran into this video here:
http://kuragari.com/2007/12/03/the-way-it-was-supposed-to-be/
Does anybody know about this, 'cause I would love stacks working this way?!

Just tried i again.
Still works on my machine:
http://kuragari.com/2007/12/03/the-way-it-was-supposed-to-be
Anyway

FPGA couldn't stack the data on FIFO working on cRIO-9082 and NI 9223 module

Hi all !
I made below logic working on FPGA ( chassis : cRIO 9082 / Analog input module : NI 9223 )
* These logic is for analyzing automotive engine combustion.
As title, it ain't work well.
Is there a basic mistake or any problem...?!
That makes me crazy.
Thanks for reading it anyway!

Sorry for the grammar
Any signal from FPGA is not transferred to RT.
Building process has no problem and logic seems to be okay..........
No error message!

How can I stack the subpages vertically in the menu in 3 columns?

I have so many subpages, the list is too long for 1 column.
So I want the subpages, still vertically, but in 3 columns.
Something like
(except this example has 2 columns)
Is that possible? I've tried to change the menu option to manually, but I can't get it to work.
They're still put together in 1 column.

Hi,
You can use the Blank Composition widget to create a totally custom navigation with custom text and links to pages of your choice. Although this would not be linked to your site structure and would not update when pages added or removed, but it would give you the most flexible setup to playaround with different ideas for dropdown navigation.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Vikas

SGE2010 stacking versus link aggregation

Can someone provide an answer regarding stacking the SGE2010 switches versus link aggregation if greater than 1 Gb connectivity is required between individual switches? Currently have several switches in a stack configuration but would like to increase the bandwidth between some or all of the switches. Does stacking support a link aggregation configuration? If so what ports can be used and how should the link aggregation be configured in conjunction with the stacking?

Hi Jacqueline,
On the SGE2010 - Default stacking ports: 24/GBIC 3, 48/GBIC 4 support stacking, that's two ports.
If you want a LAG between SGE2010, my suggestion, and others may disagree, would be to turn off the default stacking mode and enable standalone mode.
Then create a LAG between the SGE2010 switches.
regards dave

How do I copy only the flagged image in a stack to an album?

Within a project containing many stacks, I want to make an album showing only flagged images from some of these stacks. But when I try to do this, I end up with the stacks in the new album - which is not what I want.
For example, from a small gathering I have 94 photos in 24 stacks. (Among other things, I auto-bracket.) The correct image is the "pick" in each stack. I flagged 8 photos and uploaded them to a Picasa Web Album, for people to see. I want to make an album inside the project showing only the photos I uploaded, but I have not found how to do this.
I can view the 8 flagged photos by filtering, and though each has a badge showing the number of photos in its stack, the remaining photos do not appear if I click on the badge or press Shift-K or select Open/Close Stack: all that happens is that the badge toggles between the number of images in the stack ("x") and "1 of x" - say, between "4" and "1 of 4", if there are 4 images in that stack.
But when I put a flagged image into an album, I get its whole stack. It does not matter whether I drag it or choose New > Album and click the "Add selected items to new album."
This seems like such an obvious task that I feel I must be missing something.
Any help?

Just to expand on Frank's answer: that's how Aperture works. Stacks travel together. You will see the same behavior regarding filtering in the Album that you see in the Project. (Album is a container. As with a Project, you can filter the Album container to show only items that meet your filter criteria, but the contents of the container don't change by being filtered.)
This is why Album picks are so useful. In Projects, the Stack Pick is the left-most Image in the Stack, and is the Image that shows when the Stack is minimized. In Albums, you can specify an Album Pick. (The default Pick is the Stack Pick.) When a Stack in an Album is collapsed, the Album Pick is the Image that shows on top.
Added the following paragraph:
So you could have a Project with Stacks of bracketed exposures (an excellent use of Stacks), you could make the best of these the Pick, and then you could make an Album showing, say, the second best ones by putting them in an Album and designating the second-best Images as the Album Pick of each Stack.
You should have no trouble creating an Album of your selected Images (in this case, you are selecting by "is flagged"). With Stacks collapsed, you should see what you seem to want, which is a group of the Images you selected to be in the Album.
denke wrote:
I want to make an album inside the project showing only the photos I uploaded, but I have not found how to do this.
That the rest of the Images in the Stack are there shouldn't be a concern. Why is it?
Message was edited by: Kirby Krieger

Can I put only the top image of a stack in a Mobile Album?

I have an album that contains stacks and I would like to put only the top images of these stacks in a Mobile Album. Is this possible?
I have tried to make a new album and only put the top images in this new album without sucess. Is it possible to have a stack of images in one album and only the top image in another ablum?
I hope someone knows about this
Hans Brodin

Hi Surendra,
My target is to find a convenient way to transfer my best photos only to my iPad
By using stacks for similar photo and putting my best shot on top I reduce the number of images displayed in the organizer. A typical stack contains of 8 shots.
Then I put my best stacks in an album. By using the Slide Show in PE I have a convenient way to display only my best shot and tha's OK for my computer were I have a lot of disc space.
But on my iPad the size of memory is limited and it also takes some time to transfer a huge number of images so now I want to find a convenient way of tranfering only the top image of each stack. If I could have a separate album containing only the top images from each stack the task would have been easy.
Now this is not possible so now I hope there is another solution than acually making a separate copy (a new file) of each top image and put these copies in a separate album. This will of course work but it will end up in having two identical images showing up in the organizer and so I do not really like this idea.
I hope I have managed to describe my intention and do you have an idea for a workaround or do I need to make separate copies?
Thanks a lot
Hans

Stacking the SGE2010-G5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for