Standalone Scenario - GR not possible

Hi All,
     I have created Standalone scenario, after SC is ordered i am getting local PO number, after that if i try to do Good Recipt/confirmation , GR icon is disabled. It does not allow me to do GR.
    I did manintained local number range for GR in SPRO, but dont know where to link that in organisation model since i could not find suitable attribute to assign GR.
   Any input would be helpful.
Regards,
SAP Guy.

Hi All,
     I have local vendor with check box selected for 'GR based Invoice Verification', I also have movement type 202 assigned in Org Attribute.
     This is non-service describe Shopping Cart and non-service Catalog SC
Renga: I was not sure what do you mean by 'Did you maintain schema and text schema for GR and assigned schema to Transaction type?' can you please explain more in detail.
       Any Input is welcome.
Regards,
Manish.
Edited by: SAP Guy on May 1, 2008 6:29 PM

Similar Messages

  • About IDoc to file scenarios, ack not possible

    I almost work out this scenario except one error in XI, T-Code SXMB_MONI
    Acknowledgment not possible
    detail info is "Unable to convert the sender service FTP to an ALE logical system".
    Because I create two business service for SAP ERP and FTP, no technical system in SLD.
    Of course I assign the Logical system name to SAP ERP, and FTP has no Adapter specific identifiers.
    It is not Ok to create another Logical system and partner profile for this.
    Is there any expert can tell me what to do in this situation?
    Thanks for any suggestion.

    > detail info is "Unable to convert the sender service FTP to an ALE logical system".
    >
    > Because I create two business service for SAP ERP and FTP, no technical system in SLD.
    > Of course I assign the Logical system name to SAP ERP, and FTP has no Adapter specific identifiers.
    > It is not Ok to create another Logical system and partner profile for this.
    > Is there any expert can tell me what to do in this situation?
    >
    you need to do HEADER MAPPING in Receiver Agreement. Just define the sender logical system there and your problem will be solved...

  • Idoc- File scenario: acknowldgement not possible

    Hi,
    what do I need to change to be able to receive acknowledgments and get the status - "Acknowldgement contains no error"?
    Thank you,
    Olian

    hi,
    PI7.0 after support pack 10 we can able to create a separate message for Acknowldgement.
    Check the bellow link for how to configure...
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/a1b46c4c686341e10000000a114a6b/content.htm]
    *Award Points If its Useful*
    Regards,
    Prakasu

  • Scenario:SAP-XI-AS/400; Ack not possible and DB insert issues.

    Hi,
    I have a SAP-XI-AS/400 scenario and I have two issues with the same.
    1. When I trigger an IDoc to the XI system, I get ack status(in SXMB_MONI) as: "Acknowledgement not possible". The message is : "Unable to convert the sender service to an ALE logical system"
    2. While trying to do a DB insert I get the below Error and DB insert is not happening.
    " Error Unable to execute statement for table or stored procedure. '<table_name>' (Structure 'Statement_<table_name>') due to java.sql.SQLException: [SQL7008] <table_name> in <lib> not valid for operation.
    Error JDBC message processing failed; reason Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. '<table_name>' (structure 'Statement_<table_name>'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL7008] <table_name> in <lib> not valid for operation.
    Error MP: Exception caught with cause com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. '<table_name>' (structure 'Statement_<table_name>'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL7008] <table_name> in <lib> not valid for operation.
    Error Exception caught by adapter framework: null
    Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. '<table_name>' (structure 'Statement_<table_name>'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL7008] <table_name> in <lib> not valid for operation.. "
    I have been using the same kind of query we use for other succesful dB inserts.
    Can you please give me a solution and suggest possible reasons and workarounds?
    Thank you
    Best Regards,
    Smitha

    Smitha,
    Go through this links....
    Some Experts discussions..
    Error while updating JDBD table
    JDBC Error
    Error when executing statement for table/stored proc  DB2 - Data Truncation
    Hope this info is useful to you..
    Thanks,
    Satya Kumar

  • Http to file scenario generate "Acknowledgement not possible"?

    Hi.
    On PI7.1 we built a http to file scenario and used the RWB "Test message" functionality to test the interface.
    Now we get a "Acknowledgement not possible" in sxmb_moni. How can we switch this off.
    thanks

    Hi
    while sending request use either EO or EOIO for Asynch.
    EO and EOIO, processing occurs asynchronously and the client only receives a confirmation of receipt with HTTP status u2018200u2019.
    Read this
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/64db4daf9f30b4e10000000a11466f/content.htm

  • Why I can not create PO confirmation in standalone scenario?

    Dear experts,
    I am in standalone scenario in SRM 7.03.
    But why I can not create PO confirmation?
    Please help on this.
    Regards,
    Hayashi.

    Wendy ,
    Thank you for your previous reply.
    While, I am afraid I have to ask you more.
    Why I can not create the PO confirmation ?
    And I already checked the PO item information.
    Wish your response.
    Thanks
    Regards,
    Hayashi

  • Location(Plant) value  does not default in standalone scenario

    Hi,
    We are  running on SRM 5.0(SP11) Standalone scenario.When creating a shopping cart thorugh the link "DESCRIBE REQUIREMENT" i.e. Text based shopping cart,the default  value for the field LOCATION does not appear.Also in the dropwdon list,I can see all the local plants defined but when I select one,the value disappears i.e the Location field does  not  get  populated!
    Has anyone come across similar problem?If so ,please advise.
    All inputs will be highly appreciated.
    regards,
    SRM tech

    Hi Manish,
    Thanks for the prompt reply.
    I have defined  locations in the extended attribute section of the Org strcutre and also marked  as default.
    The user can  also set his default plant by going in 'Settings' when user is logged into web end of SRM.
    Basically the problem has 2 sides:
    1.No default value comes for the LOCATION field.
    2.Although I can see the F4 list ,but when i select an entry for the LOCATION,the value doesnt get populated.
    BR,
    SRm tech.

  • Question on standalone scenario?

    Hi Friends
    What is a standalone scenario.On which procurements it is possible(sp,ssp,pdp)
    Regards
    Kanni
    Edited by: Kanni. on Jun 20, 2009 9:33 PM
    Edited by: Kanni. on Jun 20, 2009 10:42 PM
    Edited by: Kanni. on Jun 20, 2009 10:42 PM

    Hello,
    Standalone scenario: As the name suggests, All the procurement functions are done in SRM & financials are handled by backend system.
    The customer does not have a productive Materials Management system and wants to handle the
    entire process locally within the Enterprise Buyer, integrating only to an accounting system.
    - Accounting processes (including FI, CO, and AM) must still be handled by a back end system. All
    validations and approvals are handled directly within Enterprise Buyer rather than in a back end
    system.
    - A shopping cart is created locally and will be further processed locally to create a purchase order.
    Self service procurement Yes, PDP- No 
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Ashutosh

  • NTLM Authentication : why is it not possible to create more than one NTLM realm ?

    Hello,
    I'm wondering why it is not possible to create more than one NTLM realm on a wsa.
    Can you explain exactly what is the blocking point ?
    Thanks in advance
    Regards

    Well, at this point (pre 7.5), there isn't an agent, the WSA is joined to the domain, just like a Windows box, it authenticates via that trust relationship.  From that point it is all based on how NT/Active Directory domains work.   As long as there is a trust between the domains, you can can auth users from as many domains as you like.
    There is an agent in the works.  The ADAgent will be released with 7.5.  The code is already available, it was released with the ASA ver 8.4, and it will be used to pass authentication info to the WSA.  At this point, current versions still require trust relationships between all of the domains touched.
    Taken from the setup guide: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ibf/setup_guide/ibf10_install.html#wp1054011
    Before you configure even a single domain controller machine using the
    adacfg dc create
    command, ensure that the AD Agent machine is first joined to a domain (for example, domain
    J
    ) that has a trust relationship with each and every domain (for example, domain
    D[i]
    ) that it will monitor for user authentications (through the domain controller machines that you will be configuring on the AD Agent machine).
    Depending on your Active Directory domain structure, the following scenarios are possible:
    1. Single Forest, Single Domain—There is only one domain, D[i] for all domain controller machines, which is one and the same as domain J. The AD Agent machine must first be joined to this single domain, and since no other domains are involved, there is no need to configure any trust relationship with any other domain.
    2. Single Forest, Multiple Domains—All the domains in a single forest already have an inherent two-way trust relationship with each other. Thus, the AD Agent must first be joined to one of the domains, J, in this forest, with this domain J not necessarily being identical to any of the domains D[i] corresponding to the domain controller machines. Because of the inherent trust relationship between domain J and each of the domains D[i], there is no need to explicitly configure any trust relationships.
    3. Multiple Forests, Multiple Domains—It is possible that domain J might belong to a forest that is different than the forest to which one or more of the domains D[i] corresponding to the domain controller machines belong. In this case, you must explicitly ensure that each of the domains D[i] has an effective trust relationship with domain J, in at least one of the following two ways:
    a. A two-way external trust relationship can be established between the two domains, D[i] and J
    b. A two-way forest trust relationship can be established between the the forest corresponding to domain D[i] and the forest corresponding to domain J

  • SSFCOMPOSER - 154 - No output request open. End not possible.

    Hi Experts,
    I'm trying to print multiple smartforms using FMs SSF_OPEN and SSF_CLOSE. Inside the main program RBDAPP01 (Inbound processing for IDOCS) there is a loop at the IDOCS to be processed. Deep within the processing, we have a custom FM being called which prints smartforms. Since there is a loop at the calling main program, I have organized the code in the custom FM such that the first IDOC calls SSF_OPEN and the last IDOC calls SSF_CLOSE, so that all IDOCS in between will be able to print their smartforms. Here is the call stack:
    8
    SAPLZCUSTOM                   
    ZCUSTOMPROGRAM                             
    113
    FUNCTION                     
    ZCUSTOMPROGRAM                                         
    7
    SAPLPPC1                               
    ZCUSTOMPROGRAM     
    136
    FUNCTION                     
    KK2A_GET_DATA_FROM_IDOC                                     
    7
    SAPLPPC1                               
    LPPC1U01                               
    1
    FUNCTION                     
    KK2A_GET_DATA_FROM_IDOC                                     
    6
    SAPLBD20                               
    LBD20F0A                               
    454
    FORM                         
    IDOCS_PASS_TO_APPLICATION                                   
    5
    SAPLBD20                               
    LBD20F0B                               
    69
    FORM                         
    IDOCS_PROCESS                                               
    4
    SAPLBD20                               
    LBD20U05                               
    260
    FUNCTION                     
    IDOC_INPUT                                                  
    3
    SAPLEDIR                               
    LEDIRU02                               
    182
    FUNCTION                     
    IDOC_START_INBOUND                                          
    2
    SAPLBD12                               
    LBD12U04                               
    37
    FUNCTION                     
    APPLICATION_IDOC_POST_IMMEDIAT                              
    1
    RBDAPP01                               
    RBDAPP01                               
    388
    EVENT                        
    START-OF-SELECTION                                          
    The problem is:
    1. When I only have 1 IDOC being processed, SSF_OPEN and SSF_CLOSE happens in the custom FM at the same time. This creates a successful spool.
    2. Whereas, when I have 2 or more IDOCS, SSF_OPEN happens in the first IDOC, but then it goes back to the calling program, and then when the last IDOC is encountered SSF_CLOSE is called. The FM SSF_CLOSE in this scenario calls the exception INTERNAL_ERROR (sy-subrc = 2).
    The system message is SSFCOMPOSER - 154 - No output request open. End not possible.
    Why is this happening? Is it because that other programs (calling programs) may have affected the status of SSF_OPEN? It seems that the SSF_OPEN is no longer open.
    Thanks in Advanced,
    Jack

    No, it will not hold the smartform open, but you don't need to hold it open in order for printout to be accumulated in one spool. Spool system does the accumulation automatically, provided the spool requests that are to be added to an existing spool request are:
    - generated in the same transaction and
    - have the same attributes (such as user, title, output device, client from which the request was issued, number of copies, priority, cover sheet setting, archive mode, and ABAP session number).
    Important is: where do OUTPUT_OPTIONS like printer come from currently? Is print parameters popup displayed on first Idoc for user to choose printer and options? Or do you use USER_SETTINGS = 'X' to simply take over defaults from user master? If the print options dialog is displayed, it needs to be controlled as well so it's displayed only once.
    Assuming print options come from the user in dialog, the logic without explicit open/close could look somewhat like this:
    On first idoc:
    - call SSF_OPEN  importing  JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS to display print options dialog; move-corresponding JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS to global OUTPUT_OPTIONS;
    - set OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDNEWID = 'X' and clear  OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDFINAL, to ensure new spool will be started (overriding user choices for these parameters!);
    - if the user has set OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDIMMED = 'X' save it globally and clear it;
    - set CONTROL_PARAMETERS-NO_OPEN = 'X';
    On subsequent idoc:
    - clear OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDNEWID;
    - clear CONTROL_PARAMETERS-NO_OPEN;
    On last idoc:
    - set OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDFINAL = 'X' (this is not absolutely necessary, but prevents further appending to the spool);
    - restore OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDIMMED from the value saved on first idoc;
    Calling Smartform:
    - set CONTROL_PARAMETERS-NO_DIALOG = 'X';
    - call smartform passing OUTPUT_OPTIONS and CONTROL_PARAMETERS;
    The logic is somewhat complicated; I'd wrap it in a class (singleton, which would be de-instantiated after last idoc) to avoid global data and code other than simple method call(s) in FM.
    Even if you decide to refactor the logic, it would still be important to understand, I think, why the current logic does not work (where and why smartform gets closed)... Maybe there are some nasty "surprises" somewhere, and your current algorithm should work.
    cheers
    Janis

  • Third Party Order - Not possible to determine a consumption account

    Hi All,
    I know there are a number of threads on this subject but the answer for me doesn't seem to be here.
    The scenario I am trying to configure is around buying and selling software licenses using a Third Party Sales Order process (Item Cat TAS).
    My material is set up as a DIEN with and Account Assignment Group of BANS and a Valuation Class of 3200 (service). I'm assuming that as the license key is a notional concept rather than a physical stocked item as such - a service is the more appropriate material type but maybe I'm wrong?
    I have entered two entries using transaction OBYC (Maintain FI Configuration: Automatic Posting - Accounts) for Transaction Key GBB:
    i) General Modification = blank
    ii) General Modification = 'AUF'
    ... but this made no difference.
    Can anyone advise how to resolve this issue please?
    As an aside I am not sure how you ever know what entries are required in this table - how can you tell what General Modification values are relevant to any given scenario?

    Hi Raja - yes this was useful but I am still having difficulties.
    OK - So I can see from your notes that the Account Modifier that I was looking for was VAX associated with the Account Assigment Group of 'X' - good so I fixed the  OBYC - GBB table to ensure I has a VAX - 3200 entry for consumption and it worked - great! BUT ...
    I then wanted to get it so that my PO would create automatically so I:
    i) Set the Auto PO on the Item Category
    ii) Set the ALE paramenters asociated with the Sales Org definition
    iii) Set the Auto PO on the Vendor Master
    but that didn't work
    I wanted to set the AUTO PO on the material master but as my MM was a DIEN this option was not available to me so I created another material that was NLAG (non-stocked) and tried again - this time I marked the Auto PO on material as well but it still didn't work because I am now geti8ng the message "Not possible to determine a consumption account" - Aaaarrrggghhhhh!!!
    Everything else remains unchanged - BANS - CS etc.
    Any ideas?

  • Asset Retirement (ABAON) error - Posting with trans.type 210 not possible

    HI All,
    I was trying to sell an asset using transaction ABAON which is fully depreciated, but I am getting the error -
    " Posting with trans.type 210 not possible (No acquisition posted)"
    The Scenario is, there is an asset(car) which was uploaded during implimentation and it got depreciated fully in the month of april.
    The same asset(car, which is fully depreciated) is sold for an amount of Rs 40000/-.
    So, I was trying to post it with some revenue vlaue in transaction ABAON, but I am getting the above error.
    (The Asset value was an uploaded during implimentation,it was not an acquisition value from SAP. It was an uploaded value from legacy data)
    Could any one help in this, or let me know the correct process for this kind of transactions.
    Awaiting for a reply.
    Regards,
    Upendra

    HI Mamta,
    Thanks for the reply.
    While Uploading the data was uploaded as asset balance upload for prior year with value.
    Plase let me know what do you propose, to be done for this.
    Regards,

  • Posting with trans type 300 not possible sap

    HI All,
    I am trying to post an entry in ABT1N. I am getting below error
    posting with trans type 300 not possible
    please assist me

    Hi Venkat,
    Are you transfering Current year acquisition?? .As Transaction Type 300 is for transfering Prior year acquisition. Request you to check and change the transaction type assign to your Variant (you are using to transfer of Asset in ABT1N) .
    Request you to tell whole scenario you are doing, if the above  suggestion did'nt help you.

  • Document is in transfer for PO, creation not possible

    Hi
    We are using SRM 4.0 EC scenario. Recently we have been facing the subjected error 'Document is in transfer for PO, creation not possible' while making the confirmation in SRM. It is observed that this is happening mostly in case once we make GR and cancel and repost. Thru some other thread posted in forum, came to know taht we need to delete the entries in table "BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB"  via FM ''BBP_DELETE_FROM_DOCUMENT_TAB''. I ran thei FM but found NO poitive results. Hope somebody can help me out. This error became very common in our production system
    Thanks
    Kiran

    Hi Kiran,
    Please, use the report CLEAN_REQREQ_UP to clear the entry made for the GR in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB. The problem comes because there is an entry for the GR in the table probably from the previous creation.
    Regards
    Saravanan.
    Please award if useful

  • Goods receipt not possible for delivery 800015869: error code 1

    Dear friends,
    I am doing MIGO-GR for outbound delivery, but getting error once inputting outbound delivery no.
    Goods receipt not possible for delivery 800015869: error code 1
    Message no. M7865
    Diagnosis
    The goods receipt for the delivery cannot be posted.
    The error according to the error code:
    1. The delivery does not exist.
    2. The delivery type is unknown.
    3. The delivery is not goods issue posted.
    4. There are no delivery items.
    5. The receiving plant could not be determined.
    6. The delivery items have already been goods receipt posted or contain zero quantities.
    7. Goods receipt(effect)movement type to goods issue movement type could not be determined.
    8. It is not currently possible to block the delivery.
    Procedure
    Error code 1      : Check your entry.
    Error code 2,3,4,6: Check the delivery and its document flow.
    Error code 5      : The delivery must be related to a purchase order or
                        the customer must be a retail business.
    Error code 7      : Check the settins for your movement types.
    Any poniters to check the setting in PO or delivery or any setting in SPRO.
    Regards
    Ashutosh

    Hi Anupam,
    That is the requirement of my scenario
    That is happening in intercompany posting.
    I am explaining to you.
    say total stock for article AR is 1000 ( In DC --A it is 500 and in store B it is 500)
    I have two company codes X and Y
    One DC (A) belongs to X and second store (B) belongs to Y.
    I have stock available for say article ( am working here in IS Retail  instead of material ) in both DC --A and Store --B.
    Now I have created PO thru replenishment planning WRP1 , now in PO supplying plant is DC.
    Now I did delivery thru VL10B and then picking and then PGI.
    Now my stock is reduced in DC by PO quantity created.( let us assume it is 100)
    So now total stock in DC=400
    Now this stock is in transit we can check thru MB5T. so total stock in transit = 100
    Now I have to do GR against delivery , if I will do GR for 100 nos , there will be no stock in transit
    and stock of receivibg store (B) will increase by 100 nos.
    But I am not able to do GR against delivery so I did GR against PO for say 50 nos. In this case stock in store is increase by 50 nos.
    But there is another stock in transit available=50
    Now why GR is not happening against delivery but it is happening against PO???
    Any pointers

Maybe you are looking for