Standard Costing Re org- Mid month

Experts ,
We rolled annual cost and 10 days after we realized our annual cost roll is wrong which has wrong OH and LAB cost.
Now we have already thousands of production orders and most of them settled and variance calculated
what is the impact if I re org and roll the cost again?
what is the impact to COGS account
What if I wait 2 days and roll the cost in next period?
Please suggest some best practices
Thanks
Prasad

Hi Prasad
If the variance is settled for the production orders, you can't do anything
For production orders which are yet to be settled, the new cost WL be taken into consideration to calculate target costs during variance calculations
If any GR from production is posted after you reverse the std cost and before releasing new cost, variances won't be calculated. So ensure that before the cost is re-released no GR is posted
Also ensure no billing doc is released if you have copa active, before the std cost is released again
Also in copa costing key, choose period indicator as 4
Br. Ajay M

Similar Messages

  • VPRS standard cost.

    Hi there we are using an additional standard cost ZPRS for a calculation with in the SD pricing. The standard cost is updated each month. Our SD calulation looks at the current selling price and if this is lower than the standard cost (ZPRS) the price used is ZPRS if the selling price is higher then the selling price is used.
    We also do retrospective orders, these have delivery dates and pricing dates in the past. But when we price the order the ZPRS is set as of today, is there way this can be made to also look in the past the same as the normal PR00 etc.
    Regards
    Steve

    ,,

  • VPRS ZPRS Standard cost

    Hi there we are using an additional standard cost ZPRS for a calculation with in the SD pricing. The standard cost is updated each month. Our SD calulation looks at the current selling price and if this is lower than the standard cost (ZPRS) the price used is ZPRS if the selling price is higher then the selling price is used.
    We also do retrospective orders, these have delivery dates and pricing dates in the past. But when we price the order the ZPRS is set as of today, is there way this can be made to also look in the past the same as the normal PR00 etc.
    Regards
    Steve

    Hi
    The scenario is very interesting. As per my understanding of the scenario, you want the back orders to consider the past condition records while determining the condition values. It can be done, but both the conditon types' records (PR00 and VPRS) are compared for a given date. One condition record of present and one condition record of past cannot be compared.
    You can try using the field 'Price Type' in Copy Controls Functionality. This is only a clue.
    Finally, when your issue is solved, please donot forget to post the answer.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Posting error..mid month cost cenre chenged

    Hi All
    One employee transferred (18.04.2011) mid month. So i have changed position (cost centre also), then employee have one cost centre in 01.04.2011 to 17.04.2011 and from 18.04.2011 onwards in another cost centre. While doing posting (PC00_M99_CIPE) system is showing below error.
    u201CBalancing field "Profit Centre" in line item 009 not filledu201D Message no. GLT2201u201D
    Here, line item 009 is /559(bank transfer wage type)
    Thanks and Regards
    Madhu Bijjala

    Hello Madhu,
    Please check with the Finance team.  Some of the settins related to cost center and profit center needs to be changed.
    Check the below thread for your reference.
    Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
    GLT2201 - Balancing field profit center in line item 001 not filled
    Hope this helps.
    Best Regards.
    Karan.

  • Costing Sheet Overhead Rate Change Mid Month

    Does SAP Support a mid month overhead rate change in a costing sheet?  I have an overhead rate change effective 5/12/2007, but my PM Order is not recognizing the change unless the Basic Start Date of the order is 6/1/2007.

    hi
    it will not support mid month overhead. it should be either period basis or yearly basis.
    regards,
    siva

  • PF- Mid month employees

    Hi all,
    I am facing some issue in the provident fund for the Mid month joined employees. As per the client requirement, SAP is not calculating. I need your help in this.
    For all the employees we are maintaining the IT 0587 has whichever is less.
    I go through some of the threads, still now I am not able to put condition in the PCR.
    Ex: Employee hired in the month of april 15.04.2014 his Basic salary is 10,000 rps.  When I run the payroll basic salary is prorated with the amount 5333.33 for 16 days in the april month. But, PF should calculate based on the amount 5333.33 but in the output it is showing as 416.
    Actually, PF should deduct 640 rps but it is showing 416 rps. 224 rps different amount is coming. How to resolve this one.
    Regards,
    Vijay Kumar

    Hi,
    When employee joins in the middle of the month The provident fund will prorate on Rs 6500 according to PF Act and standard rule that was defined in SAP as per act. You cannot change the rule that has defined in standard.  The user exist cannot be the right solution for this. The user exist which are there it will not override the standard functionality. The best way is to go according to Act that was defined in SAP.
    Incase if you want Rs 780 to be deducted for the first month for mid month joinee employees This can be done by manually inputting the data in additional payment wage type There are several ways to adjust the amount. You can either create a PF Adjustment wage type in additional payment for mid joinee employees to adjust the amount.

  • Mid month joiners PF Projection Issue

    Hi Team,
    We have an issue with respect to PF Projection for the employees who joined in mid month. We are on actual basis as an income tax projection.
    Employee joined on 16.04.2014 and his basic is 20,000 rupees. Since he joined in mid month his PF will be deducted as 1200. Now the system is projecting under Aggregate chapter VI as  1200+2400*11 = 27600 which is incorrect. It should do as 1200+1200*11 = 14400
    We are not sure why system Is behaving weird. If anybody come across this situation, please let us know.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Siva.

    Hello,
    Please note that proration in case of mid month termination and joining
    will be applicable to PF eligible pay alongwith EPF basis.
    This is the standard behaviour of the system.
    Please go through the below explanation on the proration of PF
    PF will be prorated if there is a mid month joinee or mid month
    termination. In Case of LOP the Eligible Pay is not prorated.
    If the pension basis is eligible pay which is maintained in T511P in the
    constant PFBAS and currently having the value as 6500 then, in the case
    of mid month joining  6500 gets prorated for the number of days employee
    was in the trust.
    In the case of mid month joining/leaving or transfer scenarios, the PF
    Basis will be correspondingly prorated and so the contribution
    calculated will also be prorated.
    If the customer doesn't want this pension basis to be prorated then a
    User Exit: Override Employer Pension Basis has been provided in payroll
    function INEPF. The name of the exit is EXIT_HINCALC0_002. This exit is
    in the enhancement HRINCEPF. We request you to go through the
    documentation of this user exit at
    Payroll India   > Statutory Social Contribution   > Provident Fund   >
    User Exit: Override Employer Pension Basis
    With Regards,
    Chetan

  • Mid Month Transfer Issue in Payroll

    Hello All
    Good Day!
    We have two payrolls defined, Payroll A and Payroll B and both has separate Legal entity but Business Group for both Payroll is same. We are having an issue when employee transfers from Payroll A to B or vice versa as mentioned below :
    1) Lets assume Employee transfers from Payroll A to Payroll B as on 17 Oct 2012.
    2) As Business Group is same , employee remain in the same BG.
    3) So we tried to terminate the employee as on 17-Oct-2012 and re-hired as on 18-Oct-2012 in the Payroll B. We need two IRP5 (tax certificate) so we need to terminate the employee from one payroll and reinstate in new payroll.
    4)) We have most of the recurring element configured to Terminate as Last Standard Process so all the recurring elements ended as on 31-Oct-2012, i think this should have been Actual Termination Date but as Payroll is running from last 2 years so this will be too big to change now.
    5) Now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee got full month salary in Payroll A which is not correct as employee worked up to 17-Oct-2012.
    6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
    Could you please provide your input as what is the best practice to handle this mid month transfer ?
    Thanks
    Gaurav

    Hi, Gaurav..
    6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
    =>I guess.. The "Final Process Date" set as 31-Oct-2012 when you end this employee, isn't it?
    Actual Termination Date will let person end at this date, that's mean person record's effective_end_date will equal to the Actual Termination Date and create a new person record after Actual Termination Date.
    Last Standard Process Date let all elements ended as this date.
    Final Process Date means you can process payroll run before this date, and the assignment record's effective_end_date will equal to Final Process Date. That's why your payroll run includes this person. There's no elements because all elements ended on 17-Oct-2012, system doesn't get any element on 31-Oct-2012.
    Best Regards,
    Changhua

  • Changing Plan Mid-month "pro-rated" unclear and deceptive practice. C.S. offers no help

    I recently found myself having to up my plan minutes for a family emergency. I went online and checked my usage I was at 394 minutes out of a 450 minute plan, so I elected to switch to the 900 plan minute for the month, ancipating I would go over in the next week. I was given options to back date it  or start on that day, as I had clearly not gone over my alloted minutes, I chose to start it as of that day.
    My Bill came and I received 69 dollars in minute overages. How was this explained, that by prorating the bill, they divide the cylcel in half, not only by "dollars" which seemed to be the explantion I received online, but by minutes. SO my minute alotment of 450 was reduced to 240 for those two weeks I oriignally had 450 minutes in. They billed as if that was my allowance therefore saying I now went over my plan by 154 minute which I was billed to the tune of 69.00 dollars, plus the addition of the monthly increase in plan.
    My question to any logical rational intelligent person would be, why would someone choose to up there minute plan, before they went over, just to then be charged for minutes they would not have been had they not upped there plan to the next level. This defies common sense and any explanation would as well.
    Customer service sadly would not even hear or understand this, only to say this is a valid "cost" and I should have read the "disclosure" statement or called if I had questions and not use online services. I asked both the operator and a supervisor for the terms of the disclosure agrement and neither could tell me what it said. However in reading  billing question answers they respond "For example, if you changed rate plans during the middle of your billing cycle, your statement should contain a charge for the old rate plan (according to the number of days in your cycle that you were on the old rate plan) and the new rate plan. " yes that makes sense but no where does it say your minutes may be reduced up until this point and you may occur additional charges not already used. by ironically "increasing your minute plan".
    I am waiting for a manager to return my call,  As a long time customer of verizon whom have promoted them and the new iphone all over facebook and such to my friends I am very discouraged by this practice, and the lack of resolve.

    Mike I appreciate that at least you are familiar with what the disclosure statement says, despite othert reps not being able to recite it. However the term "may" be in inself is Misleading, if "airtime" is  prorated the statement should read "YOUR airtime MINUTES will be prorated and reduced to this point, possibly resulting in overages and additional charges" The wording is intentionally misleading. If it weren't MIke, why would anyone KNowingly select an option that would then cause them to  owe an additional 69.00 dollars they didnt owe at the time, when UPPING their PLAN?
    The fact that Customer Service Can't see that as a very real possiblity and just is dissmisive saying You should have read the disclosure statement., and it is a valid charge tells, me they run into this frequently and they have a script to read from to cover themselves, leaving the HUman Element out of the equation. It is sad enough I had to Up my plan only temporarily while dealing with a tragic family situation, to add insult to injury. To me the term "may" be prorated and "may" result in additional overages meant, that if I had gone over my minutes prior to the change I would be charged, because MIKE that is COMMON SENSE. and a REASONABLE person May think that. Cutomer Service Reps could at least acknowledge that as a very real Understanding of how that line could be interupted, and that a reasonable person would not otherwise increase their plan only to be charge for something they would not have otherwise been charged.
    I am almost positive in the Future this wording will be Changed after the continued Myriad of complaints. From what I already understand the new "changing minutes and not plan" option already has changed it. SO why not make things right for long time loyal customers now. I actually want to reduce my plan back down now as it was a temporary emergency however I DONT dare do it mid month again, SO I will wait another 2 weeks and pay even more.
    This is NOT ME and my misunderstanding, just googling the topic comes up with tons and tons of complaints, articles written on the topic and so fourth. I have been waiting days for someone as promised to call me back as well and that hasnt happened. I have talked to so many friends about this many verizon customers and all say this can't be right, because it DOESNT MAKE SENSE, despite it being "valid" as you say.

  • ST.Line Mid month dep Key

    Guys,
    I need to configure a st.line  mid month depreciation key for our 39 year building asset for area AMT & ACE, The standard key ACM is not  producing the correct calculation.If I assign this key the following calculation is coming up ,
    APC=26.171.89 Life:39 years, Acq date:12/10/2009( as per our FSV its our 2010-period 1)
    dep is caculated as $335.54, which is half of the year's dep which should be $671.08, where as we want to have $671.08
    for first year. What do I need to chnage in that key??.
    Regards
    Shaun

    Paul,
    we are  using fiscal year variant from DEC-NOV and  as of 11.30.2010 is  our period 12,the last period of the year.and our fiscal periods doesnt correspondence to calender year.so now standrad key ACM with period control 06(03/03/03/03) calculating just st line in first year , which is  $ 671.08, not $ 6433.11 which is mid month calculation .but  its  not happening ,any other idea in period control that could give me that mid month convention to work.but thanks for your helpo ,u been a great help to me ,I assigned full points to you.
    Regards
    Shaun

  • Which depreciation key is eligible for mid-month convention in SAP?

    Dear Experts,
    I am looking for the depreciation key for mid-month convention for USA in SAP standard system.
    Do you know what key is for this convention?
    Thanks.
    BR,
    Chris Kim

    Dear sapfincon,
    Thank you for your comment.
    When I looked at those depreciation keys, LINA/LINK/LINR, those period control are 007 or 008.
    In case of acquisition for those period controls, "007" has "04" (First year convention at half year start date) and "008" "01" (Pro rata at period start date).
    I don't think these "04" and "01" stand for mid-month convention.
    I assume the period control "02" (Pro rata upto mid-period at period start date) is for mid-month convention.
    What do you think about this?
    Thanks again.
    BR,
    Chris Kim

  • Item Standard Cost for foreign currency purchase order

    Hi there
    I have a question about
    We have foreign currency purchases of USD which is fixed in USD.
    Currently, we are converting this into AUD and entering this as the standard cost.
    But if the currency rate is changed, we need to adjust the standard cost of AUD even though the price of USD is still the same.
    Does Oracle have standard functionality where we can enter the USD purchase price into the system and have the system rate convert it to AUD whenever we have a new exchange rate?

    Hi,
    my solutioning would be
    1. Create an Org where in item cost is maintained in US$, and perform no material transactions in this Org.
    2. Use the prog 'Copy Item Costs Across Organizations', to copy the cost from US$-Org to AUS$-Org using any conversion rate as defined (Corporate, or average etc)
    Use this process on regular basis so that you have the latest coversion and cost rate.
    Regards
    Adarsh Krishna

  • Issue with Standard Cost estimates / Material Ledger

    Background:
    We have been using SAP for the last 5 years with Material Ledger active. Due to a number of reasons, we have not revised its standard cost estimates from 2001 till now. This means that at month end, we do not mark and release prices as recommended, nor do we mark prices and use dynamic release.
    What Happened:
    A new material called PFSW3 was made. This is a FERT. Before production
    could start my team released the standard cost estimate for this material. Production was now able to proceed without problem. Then, when the time came to sell the material (VF02), SAP again raised the error 'cost estimate not found'. On checking the standard price in MM03, we discovered that the future cost estimate was missing. So we created and marked a new cost estimate in the middle of February 2007.
    Problem:
    When the first sale took place, SAP released the marked cost estimate and posted a Price Change document to adjust for the new standard cost. I understand this was due to dynamic release. Now, when month end came, the system settled all the production orders of material PFSW3 but did not do multi level costing on it.
    Internal Investigation:
    My team has determined that the material PFSW3 has price determination 2 set by mistake. All our other production materials (HALB and FERT) are
    set to price determination 3 in the material master (accounting view).
    Questions:
    To sum this situation up,
    we need to know why the material PFSW3 was not marked closed in its period status (CKM3) at the time of closing through CKMLCP?
    What are the implications of not closing this material in Feb 2007 (current period status is showing 'Quantities and values entered')?
    How can we close this material this month?
    The future cost estimate is again missing for PFSW3 in March 2007 and I
    fear we are going to face more problems as this material is sold to customers.
    Please respond this is an urgent issue.

    Dear Shumyl,
    Please, have a look at Note 645083 - Material period status set to "Closing Entry Completed" that might help to closing your material in previous period.
    Hope it will be useful.
    Regards,
    Flaviano.

  • Urgent Help in Standard Costing

    Dear sap friends
    Company want to use standard costing in sap, however they are changing their standard costs sometimes in the middle of the month and various times per month.  The discussion is around what the best practice should be and to understand why theya re changing these so frequently.  Accordingly we will need to find a soultion for them and/ or they need to be educated  and use standard costing as it should be.
    Kindly give me your advise about the standard price changing every time in the best practise. what i suppose to give them feed back and what is the best soultion i can provide the client.
    Regards,
    Henry
    Moderator: Please observe the [forum rules|/thread/931177 [original link is broken];. This is the second thread of yours we have to lock due to an inappropriate thread title - please DO NOT use the word "urgent" in the title.
    Edited by: Karl Helm  on Jul 11, 2008 9:58 AM

    Hi Satesh,
    As per your email we can change the standard price only period end. if customer wants to change middle of month or weekly what i suppose to be do.. what advice i can give to the client.  also can you explain to me about standard price, and document price. i got a note standard price and document price difference will go to variance. please explain standard price and documnet price. When they are calcuallating vairance.
    Regards
    Paul

  • Material ledger and standard cost estimate

    Hi Gurus,
    When standard cost estimate is done in a scenario, where  material ledger is activated, does the entire stock get revaluated andl post a credit in my P/L? Is it possible  to keep my inventory(FG and SFG) at periodic unit price ie at the actual manufacturing price over a longer period say 3 years? Please fill this gap in my understanding.
    Best regards
    Vimal

    Hi Vimal,
    Material ledger uses the standard price as 'preliminary price' always during the current month, independent of the question if a new standard price was estimated and released.
    But: After period end, when the actual price is calculated the posting will adjust the inventory and P/L accounts to the actual price, with posting date in the recent period.
    That means if you have a material that was manufactured once and then consumed over a 3 year period, and during that period you calculate the same material in a standard cost estimate with changing results, that would mean: Looking back at any month during the 3 years the consumption and stock values will be valued at the actual price of manufacturing. But during the currently open period it will always be valuated at the price of the last released cost estimate.
    I hope I understood your scenario correct...
    Best regards,  Udo

Maybe you are looking for