Statistical flow

Hi
Please help me!
I try to define Cash Flow item as statistical flow but I don't know which debit or credit sign assign?
For Balance and P&L it is clearly defined in help which sign to use, but for statistical flow no!
For example for CF item:
Increase/decrease in recevibles
Change in cash
Gain/loss on investing activities
regards
Pawel

Dan is right, as always.
Adding my 2 cents:
In this forum I see 2 approaches in calculating cash flow:
1. on the fly
2. by calculating the CF items as statistical ones.
Personally I, use the 2nd one because CF reports in my projects are to complicated and need some eliminations. For me the main method of CF calculation is a reclass. Exactly in the reclass you may play with signs of the amounts. And for this purpose it's very convinient to use the reclass with a source and target (one of the entrie's side might contain the technical stat item) -- very easy to change the sign, because sometimes even the accountants may not be sure in the sign of the sum.

Similar Messages

SEM-BCS Statistical FS Items (Statistical: Balance and Statistical: Flow)

Hi,
SEM-BCS 4.0 and SEM-BCS 6.0 both have 2 types of Statistical FS Item (Financial Statement item); "Statistical: Balance" and "Statistical: Flow".
I note that these are treated differently, e.g. in Balance Carryforward task, Statistical: Balance are carried forward automatically while Statistical: Flow are not.
My question is, what is the difference between these statistical item types?
And what are they (or could they be) used for?

Hi,
I'll try to explain you like the following:
Balance is a value that is derived from beginning balance plus movement. Flow is the movement itself.
Trial balance is an example of balance, while movement type is an example of flow.
When you do balance carry forward, system add all the flow type that you define to make a balance, and carry forward the balance only.
Hope it helps.
regards,

Question on "Get Reporting Statistic" and If statement issue

Hello
I worked up a "Get Reporting Statistic" in my script that looks for agents that are in the Not Ready state.
Report Object:    CSQ IPCC Express
Field:     Not Ready Resources
Row Identifier:    Queue_Name
Result Statistic:    Not_Ready_Resources
I have an If then statement:
If(Not_Ready_Resources <1) then
True - go to a prompt
False - go to the queue
It seems like this is behaving backwards. When I am logged in on my agent it seems to follow the True step which it should go to the queue. When I am logged out it goes to the false step, to the queue.
Any thoughs on why it would behave backwards?
thanks

Apologies, replying via the email interface is a bit annoying.
Your code is a tad confusing to begin with. Why are you checking to see if there are people in the not ready state before trying to queue?
Instead a cleaner flow would simply queue first, play the prompt and any other actions in the queue step. This way your person is immediately placed in the queue and if someone is available they go straight to them otherwise they will hear your prompt. If I am understanding your code properly, the if statement is unnecessary.
Regardless, why are you checking for agents not ready? (I'm honestly curious). Is there something more specific that needs to happen if an agent is not ready? Otherwise, your flow should be checking for Agents in the ready state
if(Agents_Ready > 0)
     true:
          queue
     false:
          prompt
but again this is entirely irrelevant considering:
Select Resource Step
     queue:
          prompt
          // no available agents
     connected:
         //agents ready
Perhaps I am completely misunderstanding? Apologies if that is the case.

Excise Values Not Flowing in J1IIN-(export Excise Invoice)

Hai ALL,
I have gone through the previous threads,
with those replies, my purpose hasnt solved.
req: -
" I am creating Export Excise invoice - J1IIN ( wrt : Export Invoice-VF01), Maintained "Subtransaction type- EX Exports"-
did the rel config: specify G/L accounts for ETT.
- Excise values flowing from VF01- J1IIN for domestic sales, but the same is not flowing into Export Excise Invoice-" -
my doubt is: Do the Excise Values flow to Export Excise Invoice from Comm.Invoice. ( As in Exp.Exc.Invoice, system will not generate any accounting entries).

IN export sales,
I have maintained ED cond types as "Statistical" so that the values should not considered in Net value calculation. - which is working fine & Accounting documents for ED wont generate.
I have created Exp.Exc Invoice-J1IIN (with ref to- Comm.Invoice & Sub transaction type - EX_exports)- ED values in Comm Inv- flowing to Exp Exc Invoice. - In utilization tab- when change "Exc.Invoice type" - LoU, values become Zero- ( as MBS said, will take help of ABAPer to write the code "Suppress_calculation - "X"- )
But, can you confirm, that when we save Exp Exc Invoice- will accounting doc's generated or not-
( I expect, A/c'g docs will not generate- am i rite?)
after this, I have updated RG1-J1i5 (with Classification - IWE, RMA is done when GR from Production), Extract/print-RG1 - J2I5/J2I6.
Now create ARE-1 - J1IA101 ( wrt : Exp Exc Invoice) - mark the "Print ARE document"- Entered the "Bond" details in "BOND UT-1" tab. & save.
next, Post ARE-1 , Update ARE-1 & finally Close ARE-1.
"When we close ARE-1"?
is my understading above is rite??
pls suggest
Edited by: SAP Consultant- on Jan 28, 2009 4:31 PM

Statistical Internal Orders - How can i charge to multiple cost centers

In the master data for the statistical internal orders, I am only able to enter one cost center in the 'Actual Posted Cctr' field. Is there a way to have multiple cost centers and the allocation % for each cost center (similar to the settlement rules on regular internal orders)?
thanks!

Hiya,
OKB9 works by assigning multiple Cost Centres to the Company Code + GL combination. However, I don't believe OKB9 is your solution - for the simple reason that you wish to post the information to multiple CCtrs, along with posting it to this Statistical IO.
In my opinion, you may have to delete the Actual Cost Centre assignment and, at the time of document posting, assign the True CCtr as well as this IO, or look for a User Exit that will trigger flows to multiple CCtrs along with this IO.
The other option is to make this a real posting to this IO (change the IO from statistical to real), and then settle this cost to multiple CCtrs. As long as it stays statistical, you don't have the liberty of settling the cost.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.

Cost of Goods Sold not flowing to CO-PA

Dear Experts,
I have assigned VPRS (statistical condition type) to CO-PA value field in KE4I,but when I create billing document,the COGS value is not flowing to COPA.
Can anybody help me as WHAT is missing in configuration for not flowing COGS to CO-PA?
Treat it very...... .
Regards
Su

Hi,
Can anybody explian the logic behind the documents triggered by the system in the following scenarios?
At the time of PGI:
COGS A/c Dr to FG Stock A/c (Accounting Document)
COGS A/c (CO Document and No COPA Document)
At the time of Billing
Customer A/c Dr to Sales A/c (FI Document)
Sales A/c-PSG for Sales A/cs (CO Document)
All the line items relating to Sales Revenue (CO-PA Document)
So finally in FI under P&L,COGS A/c in Debit side and Sales in Credit side appears as Customer and FG Stock comes under Balance sheet.
The above said entries are correct and Standard SAP behaves the same.
Regards
Su

Condition VPRS not flowing to CO-PA

Hi Experts,
I configured condition VPRS in KE4I as I want Cost of Goods Sold to be transferred to CO-PA, and this information is availabe in a statistical condition in Billing Documents (we are implementing account based CO-PA).
During my simulations in KE4ST, the values for condition VPRS are not appearing in "Valuation Tab", only the values for Revenue and Tax conditions are appearing.
Our client has the COGS account created as cost element category 12.
Can you help me? Is there other configuration needed to flow values from VPRS to CO-PA?
Is the cost element cat 12 a problem when I want to derive COGS from VPRS?
I will not map this cost element in OKB9 for PA segment.
Kind Regards
Mayumi

I've checked in KEKF and it is active. This has been active before the addition of the new value field as well. Nothing has changed.
The transfer of values is based on sales and billing document. This is how it has been since we went live. So it is driven by the condition type and value field mappings in KE4I.
But the sales order details are not flowing to co-pa. My suspicion is that might have to do with the Material Cost estimates in test environment.
Please let me know if you have any other pointers.

VPRS issue in STO - IC Billing process flow

Hi Experts,
I am working on following process flow (Stock transport PO - Delivery - Intercompany billing).
Same condition type ZIXX is maintained in MM & SD Pricing procedure. In PO (STO), ZIXX is determined based on material valuation data and the same amount gets copied to IC billing.
Along with ZIXX, we have VPRS condition type in billing pricing procedure. But issue is that: VPRS does not get determine. System analysis shows message 217 (error in quantity/ value determination for VPRS).
Meanwhile, condition amount for ZIXX (determined in PO) and VPRS (determined in IC billing) may differ in some of the business scenarios. So both condition types are needed.
Following settings have been maintained:
·         Copy control settings between delivery & IC billing document
o   Price source A (Purchase order)
o   Pricing type C (Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine others)
·         Item category (Intercompany) has marked for ‘Determine cost’ with billing relevance as A (delivery related billing)
·         Condition type VPRS
o   marked as G (Internal Price)
o   marked for ‘quantity conversion
o   marked as ‘statistical’ in billing pricing PP
o   subtotal B and requirement routine 4 (Cost)
·         Condition type ZIXX
o   Marked as G (Internal price) in MM Pricing procedure
o   Marked as H (Basic Price) in SD PP with requirement routine as 2 (item with pricing)
·         Material type is updated for ‘quantity and value update’ in SAP T.Code: OMS2
Kindly let me know, how we can resolve VPRS issue.

Hi Sachin,
For the similar issue you face, there has been a discussion in the forum.. Pls check
VPRS retrives the cost of the Material from the material master data > Accounting 1 tab to the Sales order.
Once the cost is found, then Profit margin (Net value - cost) is calculated.
VPRS does not contain any Access sequence.
With the help of its Condition category "G", it accesses the Material master > Accounting tab 1 and takes cost.
There may be two cost specified in the Material master. They are
- Moving Avarage Price
- Standard Price
Which one system will consider that depends upon the "Price control" field.
If the value is "V' in the Price control field, the system takes the "Moving Avarage Price" and if it is "S", then system takes the "Standard Price".
So, you must ensure these few control
- VPRS should NOT have any Access sequence.
- Condition category "G" must have been assigned to VPRS.
- VPRS must have been activated as "Statistical" condition in the Pricing Procedure and should not have any Account key.
With Regards
S.Siva

Sales Pricing Procedure : Statistical Condition type and Reqt.

Hi,
I wish to know what else is the use of marking the condition type statistical except the ones i know. (a) now included in the final price. but will be seen in the condtions (b) Can be used to send that value to a particular account.
What is the use of the following routines in the Reqt. field and what do they do
a. (2) - Item with Pricing. Now in this routine it check "prsfd". which is field called carry out pricing in the table.
Can someone explain me how this works. Also if you can explain how these subroutines genrally work. It would be great.

Hi Dheeraj,
What you told is correct that Statistical Condition means that the condition item is ignored. In other words, no flow records are generated in the cash flow.
While regarding Requirement, it is pre-requisite to take that particular Cond type (to which it is assigned) into consideration while carry out pricing.
Like in your case Requirement "2" (item with pricing), the condition type(s) to which it is assigned would be taken into pricing only when item has pricing attched to it.
Regards
SD

Statistical cost element (Value type 11) line item entry in CJI3

Dear all
I am doing WBS settlement to AUC thr CJ88. Suppose actual cost on WBS is 100 rs.
CJI3 report shows the balance to be settled to AUC. Now It is showing 100 rs balance. I carry out WBS settlement to AUC.
Even though settlement has taken place to AUC, CJI3 is showing line item entry of 100 rs (Statistical cost element with value type 11).
This also affects our reporting as in report S_ALR_87013558, because of statistical cost element line item entry, WBS actual cost is showing as (100+100 st'cal)
Also, I read in sap note 666152 that we can define transaction type as not releavent for account assignment. But i dont see this kind of setting anywhere in transaction type.
Can we restrict the statistical cost element to not take part in CJI3 (CO reporting)? How we can avoid statistical CO postings.
Pls suggest
Madhusudan Patil

Hello,
Statistical postings could be generated, if
(a) you have 2 co-objects, e.g. cost center and internal order. There is a default rule in the system, that in this case the internal order will be posted real and the cost center statistical
(b) you have 2 co-objects and one is marked as statistical in the master data. Actual Postings only to statistical co-objects are not possible. You can not settle statistical values, they will stay at the object.
Please check OSS-message 106968. It explains everything in detail.
You can modify your report, that it will show only real postings (value type 04), but I wouldn't do it. For me it sounds that you have to check your value flows in general. They look inconsistent, if you do not expect statistical postings.
Kind regards
Tapio
Message was edited by:
Tapio Reisinger

Sales order value flow to internal order without cost elements.

Dear Sap Friends,
My client have a requirement, when sales people creating a sales order, sales value flow into internal order without a cost elements. normal case when SO, Deleivery, and billing data automatically can flow into CO-PA. Here i want to know how value can flow into I.O. without a cost elements please give me advise.
i created a statistical internal order and that internal order i assigned in sales order account assingment. but i know that there is no value going to flow this I.O. becasue there is no cost elements.(becasue client dont want to create a cost element for internal order)
There is any option when i crate a sales order values can go into internal order without cost elements or i can create a statistical Internal Order and assigned into CO-PA? if i can dothatt what is the steps. kindly explain to me. if some have can explain to me please leave contacts number or send me reply.
Regards
Paul

By standard configuration itr is not possible.
You ought to have user exit in place.
For DC A & B, where you need a redetermination of pricing component, take help of an ABAPer for user exit USEREXIT_XKOMV_FUELLEN (module pool SAPLV61A, program RV61AFZB).
So now, for DC C, you need to change the copying control in VTFL - item, where your pricing type ought to be D-Copy pricing elements unchanged.
Regards
JP
ASSUMPTION: I assume that your all DC uses the same Sales Doc type & Billing Doc type

Base value not flowing in J1IEX

Hi All,
The Excise Base Value is not flowing in J1IEX. I am doing an STO. The other duties like BED, AED are flowing while capturing excise invoice, but not the Base value.
PLease let me know the settings to ensure the Base value flows in J1IEX.
Thanks.
Manish

Hi Chintu,
Please find the process for STO.
> > -2 Plants - 1 Supplying and 1 receiving
> > -Receving plant is created as customer in XD01
> >-Material is created in both the plants
> >-All the IMG settings are done both at MM and SD parts
> >-STO PO is created with doc.type "UB" in ME21n
> >-In VL10B OBD is created wrt PO number & PGI is also done here
> >-In VF01 commercial invoice is created (Here all the excise duties like BED, AED, SED are calculated and PR00 is statistical)
> >-Excise invoice is created wrt Commercial invoice
> >-Now in J1IEX I have to give both STO PO number and excise invoice number. When I give the excise invoice number, all the duties are flowing but when I give the STO PO number the BASE VALUE is not flowing.
Let me know if you require any more details from my end.
Regards
Ayyallas
Edited by: ayyallas on Nov 13, 2009 5:41 AM

Table J_1IEXCDTL - EXBAS isnt updated -Excise Base Amt not flowing to ARE1

Dear Friends,
This is in continuation to the earlier post.......Excise Duty Base Amount is not flowing into ARE1...Iam here briefing up the earlier post details:
When I am creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice, Excise Duty Base Amount is not flowing into ARE1 but BED and other cess conditions are flowing into ARE1
Liable to AT1 and Indicator NCCD is checked and in my pricing procedure NCCD condition is not maintained as its not required.
The latest patch updated in my system is SAPKH600011 (Logistics and Accounting).....
Most importantly the Excise base amount field is not seen in the Excise Invoice but in ARE1 this field is in display mode and Excise base value is not flowing into the Table J_1IEXCDTL field EXBAS.
Someone Pl help me on this issue.
Thanks
Sasi
Edited by: j sasi on Jul 9, 2008 7:13 AM

Sasi,
I think you are making a mistake between manual and mandatory. IN the pricing procedure MAN stands for manual condition and mdt stands for mandatory. Now in the standard, the PR00 is an automatic entry and JASS is a manual and a statistical condition. It is not mandatory. PR00 being the base value for calculation of gross price/nett price it is mandatory.
Most of the customers prefer a manual pricing procedure where PR00, discount, surcharge everything is manual.
In such a case change the appropriate condition type to the manual condition with manual has priority in the settings for condition type.
But here you need to enter the prices and all the conditions manually.
Here you should have only one condition type for pricing condition with the category as basic price. PR00 is normally that condition and so is the P101 which is a Price ( STO). Now if there are several select all others to statistical and only PR00 with an account key assignment to ERL.
Ensure that JASS the assesable value as statistical and manual.
If however you want the JASS as the excise base amount then PR00 will be used for calculation of discounts and and NETT price only but JASS will be the one for Excise base amount.
BAsed on this excise base amount which you will find in the table J_1IEXCHDR the values for BED, ECS and SECS gets calculated.
Either way is O.K but one word of caution. There is an assessable value in the J1ID transaction where you maintain the Assessable value for materials. Its mostly used in TAXINJ. DO not use it or even if that field is filled ensure that you give the JASS assessable value manually at the time of calculating SAles ordr pricing.
If you don;t then there will be an error.
Also check in the analysis whch condition basis value is being taken for calculated in your excise conditions.
This should solve your problem.
Remember calculating assessable value is not a small thing but customers prefer it because reversing excise or paying additional excise is a pain for them. If thats the case then so be it.
But ensure that assessable value is calculated nett of discounts and given there.
In one case I came across where otehr charges, finance charges and transportation were added to the basic price and only on the total excise duty was added and discount was given after calculation of excise duty. Please check your scenario in line with your requirement. Any questions. My pleasure to reply.
regards
Jude

Info required on work flows

Hi all,
Can anyone provide me info on work flows . Any documents is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Rajashree

Hi Rajashree,
Workflow is a tool for automating the business process so that the process itself flows smoothly, without bottlenecks and without dead ends. Critical parts of the process can be streamlined with deadline monitoring and contingency options. Participants are informed of milestones in the process. The process definition itself is powerful enough to allow business re-engineering with re-training and to eliminate the impact of workforce changes on the basic business process.
SAP Business Workflow is the R/3 tool for handling the process automation within R/3 or between R/3 systems and other systems involved in the business process. It is flexible enough to handle ad hoc processes such as the circulation of an electronic document. It is robust enough to handle mission critical process in the production system such as the creation of a material master.
The different R/3 applications supply standard workflows for the commonly occurring processes. Once these workflow templates are activated, they are ready for immediate use. A complete set of workflow tools, including the workflow editor and workflow generation wizard, are provided to enhance these standard workflows or create new workflows. These tools are complemented with transactions for monitoring, tracking and the statistical analysis of the processes.
Because the business process often does not step at the R/3 boundary, various interfaces and third party tools are available for extending the process across systems.
Workflow is the technique for automating business processes. It is particularly beneficial
when different people are involved in different parts of the process
when a process only occurs sporadically and the users need to be reminded of what they need to do
when the duration of the process is critical and deadlines have to be met
when the process definition is likely to change on the fly and retraining users is not possible.
By automating the process, you free the users from having to know what to do when. Work items are sent to the participants notifying them of what they have to do, and a single click on the notification calls the correct transaction and navigates to the relevant screen.
When the workflow runs it creates work items which are like e-mails, but
they have the advantage that they contain the intelligence needed to execute the relevant task with the correct data when the operational user executes them,
they provide their own functionality so that the operational user has access to everything that is useful to improve the flow of the process,
they disappear on their own when they have been executed by someone else or made obsolete.
These work items can be received in the R/3 business workplace, MS Outlook (or any other MAPI compatible client), Lotus Notes, or work item notifications can be distributed by e-mail.
SAP Business Workflow:
accelerates the workflow across applications, functional areas, organizational units, and time periods,
supplements the integrated management of processes in the SAP System with individually tailored options for automating and actively controlling business and communication processes,
combines integrated organizational management with flexible assignment of tasks and responsibilities to locations, positions, jobs, groups, or individuals,
actively supports a quick implementation of workflow technologies through predefined workflow templates, Workflow Wizards and flexible adjustment options,
integrates every employee in the value chain by providing a versatile integrated inbox ("universal inbox") at their work centers that can be configured individually,
provides a Workflow Information System that is the foundation for process change management and continuous business engineering,
was designed to be a change-management tool,
simplifies continuous business engineering and process change management with user-friendly tools for defining and dynamically changing workflow tasks
conforms to the workflow standards of the Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC)
interfaces to other mail clients such as Lotus Notes and MS Outlook
Check these links.
http://www.sapgenie.com/workflow/index.htm
/people/ginger.gatling/blog/2005/12/01/link-workflow-business-objects-to-your-collaboration-tasks
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/92/bc26a6ec2b11d2b4b5006094b9ea0d/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/92/bc26a6ec2b11d2b4b5006094b9ea0d/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw31/helpdata/en/8d/25f94b454311d189430000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://www.sap-press.com/product.cfm?account=&product=H950
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PSWFL/PSWFL.pdf
http://www.workflowing.com/id18.htm
http://www.e-workflow.org/
http://www.sap-img.com/workflow/sap-workflow.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/a5/172437130e0d09e10000009b38f839/frameset.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/workflow/sap-workflow.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/a5/172437130e0d09e10000009b38f839/frameset.htm
For examples on WorkFlow...check the below link..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/3d/6a9b3c874da309e10000000a114027/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PSWFL/PSWFL.pdf
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4a/dac507002f11d295340000e82dec10/frameset.htm
http://www.workflowing.com/id18.htm
http://www.e-workflow.org/
http://web.mit.edu/sapr3/dev/newdevstand.html
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/3d/6a9b3c874da309e10000000a114027/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PSWFL/PSWFL.pdf
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4a/dac507002f11d295340000e82dec10/frameset.htm
http://www.workflowing.com/id18.htm
http://www.e-workflow.org/
http://web.mit.edu/sapr3/dev/newdevstand.html
Workflow tutorials with step-by-step and with screenshots are available at
http://www.****************/Tutorials/Workflow/Workflow.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/42/c14a9b55103116e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/c5/e4a930453d11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Hope this resolves your query.
Reward all the helpful answers.
Regards

Capital cash flow report thru internal order

Hello experts
Our client needs report inrespect of procurement of capital assets through internal order.(We use both statistical and real orders)The report is to be consists of 1.sanction number(Internal order KO01),2.sanction amount maintained in the order KO22 and the 3.commitments i.e.PO releases and 4.Cash out flow against the sanctions and committments.Iam trying the check the relevant tables but iam not getting the sequence of table in which i can extrat the data.can anybody having idea or developed this type of developement plse reply soon.
thanks in advance
RAJA

Hi
As you said that standard report for budget/actul/committements available.But our requirment is we have budgets in combination of assets class,dept,cost center and project and have sepatare snction ref number for each of those.we want to give report sanction number wise and the report should consists of previous year sanction amount,current year sanction,committments i.e.PO releases,committments against the previous year and current year,cash out flow against the committments i.e with reference to sanction number what is actul cash out flow.pls let me know if you know ligic to be build while development.
raja

Statistical flow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for