Statspack analysis
Dear all
I need a complete reference what to look in statspack report as i have the report
but how to analyze that ?? what to analyze ...
please let me know in details....
regards
Saagar,
I have not come across anything which is much detailed about Tkprof.The oracle docs are good for this.I have found Tom Kyte's Effective Oracle By Design a good book for this purpose too.I can suggest you these too.
I am concentrating more on 10046 event and using raw trace files more for tuning.I shall say that you should look for 10046 event and try to get your hands over it.Charles has given couple of good notes how to use the information and he is very frequent in posting several test cases here usng the same.So search this forum for also.
Aman....
Similar Messages
-
hi guys,
I need to analysis my statspack report of my own. Is there any free tool provided to analyse the report of my own.
TIA,Hi,
You could take a look at a great set of statspack and AWR analysis tools here http://www.statsviewer.netfirms.com/
Cheers -
Want a good doc on how to study statspack
I know db tuning is a vast and its very tough to give any thumbrule on how to tune db from statspack report but hope there must be something for me.Its not like I can not understand it at all.I can understand 40% of the report but there are certain things that goes above my head.In order to understand the entire document and to take advantage of the entire report be it AWR or ADDM or STATSPACK is there any ground work document available ? please revert back if you cound sense any.
Thanks
ADThe statspack analysis tool at http://www.oraperf.com/ is very useful in identifying and explaining key areas of the report and their respective impacts / symptoms etc.
-
Best Oracle DB Analysing utility
Hai Experts,
I need a Software , to help the Oracle Database Optimization...(such a as statspack analyser/details of long sql operations...etc..)
so please give me the details of the best tools available in the market (Free/Paid software)..
regards,
jp
Edited by: jp@valapad on Mar 17, 2010 1:23 AMHi
V 11.1.0.7
AWR , ADDM , SPA , DBMS_ADVISOR , DBMS_SQLTUNE .....
EE and separate license is required to use them
T -
Poor performance when running DBMS_STATS package
Hello,
I thought I would throw this issue out to the general population as I am stumped.
I have two identical schemas on two different severs. Database in 9.2.0.6 and for QAS and Production reasons the servers and database settings are identical.
I am running the DBMS_STATS.GATHER_SCHEMA_STATS package on both databases. On the QAS DB it takes roughly 1.5 hours while on the Production database it takes 8.0 hours.
Looking at the statspack analysis, the biggest thing to jump out at me is that the temporary tablespace is getting 4.6 Million I/O hits (reads) while the QAS is only getting a few thousand.
So .... this sort of indicates that something is going on in the PGA which could cause Oracle to use the TEMP tablespace. However when I look in the host performance (using Grid Control) the servers memory, file I/O, and CPU while high are not over 80%.
Has anyone else seen and issue like this? Any ideas where to look?
Thanks,
ChrisTo the extent that you are gathering histograms on the data, Oracle potentially has to do a reasonable amount of sorting. If one machine has substantially more physical RAM, that presumably implies that it has more RAM available for the PGA, which would allow more sorts to happen in memory rather than on disk.
Depending on how you create a "refresh copy of production" and what parameters you are passing in to DBMS_STATS, it is also possible that the quality assurance database is gathering substantially more histograms than the production database (i.e. you refresh lower environments via export and import rather than doing an RMAN clone and tell Oracle to gather histograms on any columns that currently have histograms).
Justin -
Hi: I'm analyzing this STATSPACK report: it is "volume test" on our UAT server, so most input is from 'bind variables'. Our shared pool is well utilized in oracle. Oracle redo logs is not appropriately configured on this server, as in 'Top 5 wait events' there are 2 for redos.
I need to know what else information can be dig-out from 'foreground wait events' & 'background wait events', and what can assist us to better understanding, in combination of 'Top 5 wait event's, that how the server/test went? it could be overwelming No. of wait events, so appreciate any helpful diagnostic or analysis. Database is oracle 11.2.0.4 upgraded from 11.2.0.3, on IBM AIX power system 64bit, level 6.x
STATSPACK report for
Database DB Id Instance Inst Num Startup Time Release RAC
~~~~~~~~ ----------- ------------ -------- --------------- ----------- ---
700000XXX XXX 1 22-Apr-15 12:12 11.2.0.4.0 NO
Host Name Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory (G)
~~~~ ---------------- ---------------------- ----- ----- ------- ------------
dXXXX_XXX AIX-Based Systems (64- 2 1 0 16.0
Snapshot Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess Comment
~~~~~~~~ ---------- ------------------ -------- --------- ------------------
Begin Snap: 5635 22-Apr-15 13:00:02 114 4.6
End Snap: 5636 22-Apr-15 14:00:01 128 8.8
Elapsed: 59.98 (mins) Av Act Sess: 0.6
DB time: 35.98 (mins) DB CPU: 19.43 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 2,064M Std Block Size: 8K
Shared Pool: 3,072M Log Buffer: 13,632K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------ ----------------- ----------- -----------
DB time(s): 0.6 0.0 0.00 0.00
DB CPU(s): 0.3 0.0 0.00 0.00
Redo size: 458,720.6 8,755.7
Logical reads: 12,874.2 245.7
Block changes: 1,356.4 25.9
Physical reads: 6.6 0.1
Physical writes: 61.8 1.2
User calls: 2,033.7 38.8
Parses: 286.5 5.5
Hard parses: 0.5 0.0
W/A MB processed: 1.7 0.0
Logons: 1.2 0.0
Executes: 801.1 15.3
Rollbacks: 6.1 0.1
Transactions: 52.4
Instance Efficiency Indicators
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 100.00 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 99.98 Optimal W/A Exec %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 99.77 Soft Parse %: 99.82
Execute to Parse %: 64.24 Latch Hit %: 99.98
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 53.15 % Non-Parse CPU: 98.03
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 10.50 12.79
% SQL with executions>1: 69.98 78.37
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 70.22 81.96
Top 5 Timed Events Avg %Total
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wait Call
Event Waits Time (s) (ms) Time
CPU time 847 50.2
enq: TX - row lock contention 4,480 434 97 25.8
log file sync 284,169 185 1 11.0
log file parallel write 299,537 164 1 9.7
log file sequential read 698 16 24 1.0
Host CPU (CPUs: 2 Cores: 1 Sockets: 0)
~~~~~~~~ Load Average
Begin End User System Idle WIO WCPU
1.16 1.84 19.28 14.51 66.21 1.20 82.01
Instance CPU
~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Time (seconds)
Host: Total time (s): 7,193.8
Host: Busy CPU time (s): 2,430.7
% of time Host is Busy: 33.8
Instance: Total CPU time (s): 1,203.1
% of Busy CPU used for Instance: 49.5
Instance: Total Database time (s): 2,426.4
%DB time waiting for CPU (Resource Mgr): 0.0
Memory Statistics Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------ ------------
Host Mem (MB): 16,384.0 16,384.0
SGA use (MB): 7,136.0 7,136.0
PGA use (MB): 282.5 361.4
% Host Mem used for SGA+PGA: 45.3 45.8
Foreground Wait Events DB/Inst: XXXXXs Snaps: 5635-5636
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by Total Wait Time desc, Waits desc (idle events last)
Avg %Total
%Tim Total Wait wait Waits Call
Event Waits out Time (s) (ms) /txn Time
enq: TX - row lock contentio 4,480 0 434 97 0.0 25.8
log file sync 284,167 0 185 1 1.5 11.0
Disk file operations I/O 8,741 0 4 0 0.0 .2
direct path write 13,247 0 3 0 0.1 .2
db file sequential read 6,058 0 1 0 0.0 .1
buffer busy waits 1,800 0 1 1 0.0 .1
SQL*Net more data to client 29,161 0 1 0 0.2 .1
direct path read 7,696 0 1 0 0.0 .0
db file scattered read 316 0 1 2 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 144 0 0 2 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 30 0 0 3 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S 10 0 0 9 0.0 .0
row cache lock 41 0 0 2 0.0 .0
latch: row cache objects 19 0 0 3 0.0 .0
log file switch (private str 8 0 0 7 0.0 .0
library cache: mutex X 28 0 0 2 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chains 54 0 0 1 0.0 .0
latch free 290 0 0 0 0.0 .0
control file sequential read 1,568 0 0 0 0.0 .0
log file switch (checkpoint 4 0 0 6 0.0 .0
direct path sync 8 0 0 3 0.0 .0
latch: redo allocation 60 0 0 0 0.0 .0
SQL*Net break/reset to clien 34 0 0 1 0.0 .0
latch: enqueue hash chains 45 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers lru cha 7 0 0 2 0.0 .0
latch: session allocation 5 0 0 1 0.0 .0
latch: object queue header o 6 0 0 1 0.0 .0
ASM file metadata operation 30 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: In memory undo latch 15 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: undo global data 8 0 0 0 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message from client 6,362,536 0 278,225 44 33.7
jobq slave wait 7,270 100 3,635 500 0.0
SQL*Net more data from clien 7,976 0 15 2 0.0
SQL*Net message to client 6,362,544 0 8 0 33.7
Background Wait Events DB/Inst: XXXXXs Snaps: 5635-5636
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by Total Wait Time desc, Waits desc (idle events last)
Avg %Total
%Tim Total Wait wait Waits Call
Event Waits out Time (s) (ms) /txn Time
log file parallel write 299,537 0 164 1 1.6 9.7
log file sequential read 698 0 16 24 0.0 1.0
db file parallel write 9,556 0 13 1 0.1 .8
os thread startup 146 0 10 70 0.0 .6
control file parallel write 2,037 0 2 1 0.0 .1
Log archive I/O 35 0 1 30 0.0 .1
LGWR wait for redo copy 2,447 0 0 0 0.0 .0
db file async I/O submit 9,556 0 0 0 0.1 .0
db file sequential read 145 0 0 2 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 349 0 0 0 0.0 .0
db file scattered read 30 0 0 4 0.0 .0
control file sequential read 5,837 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 19 0 0 4 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 5 0 0 15 0.0 .0
direct path write 14 0 0 2 0.0 .0
direct path read 3 0 0 7 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 3 0 0 6 0.0 .0
log file single write 56 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: redo allocation 53 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: active service list 1 0 0 3 0.0 .0
latch free 11 0 0 0 0.0 .0
rdbms ipc message 314,523 5 57,189 182 1.7
Space Manager: slave idle wa 4,086 88 18,996 4649 0.0
DIAG idle wait 7,185 100 7,186 1000 0.0
Streams AQ: waiting for time 2 50 4,909 ###### 0.0
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle w 129 0 3,612 28002 0.0
Streams AQ: qmn coordinator 258 50 3,612 14001 0.0
smon timer 43 2 3,605 83839 0.0
pmon timer 1,199 99 3,596 2999 0.0
SQL*Net message from client 17,019 0 31 2 0.1
SQL*Net message to client 12,762 0 0 0 0.1
class slave wait 28 0 0 0 0.0
thank you very much!Hi: just know it now: it is a large amount of 'concurrent transaction' designed in this "Volume Test" - to simulate large incoming transaction volme, so I guess wait in eq:TX - row is expected.
The fact: (1) redo logs at uat server is known to not well-tune for configurations (2) volume test slow 5%, however data amount in its test is kept the same by each time import production data, by the team. So why it slowed 5% this year?
The wait histogram is pasted below, any one interest to take a look? any ideas?
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: XXXX/XXXX Snaps: 5635-5636
-> Total Waits - units: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits - column heading: <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> % of Waits - value: .0 indicates value was <.05%, null is truly 0
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
Total ----------------- % of Waits ------------------
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
ADR block file read 19 26.3 5.3 10.5 57.9
ADR block file write 5 40.0 60.0
ADR file lock 6 100.0
ARCH wait for archivelog l 14 100.0
ASM file metadata operatio 30 100.0
CSS initialization 30 100.0
Disk file operations I/O 9090 97.2 1.4 .6 .4 .2 .1 .1
LGWR wait for redo copy 2447 98.5 .5 .4 .2 .2 .2 .1
Log archive I/O 35 40.0 8.6 25.7 2.9 22.9
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 34 85.3 8.8 5.9
SQL*Net more data to clien 29K 99.9 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
buffer busy waits 1800 96.8 .7 .7 .6 .3 .4 .5
control file parallel writ 2037 90.7 5.0 2.1 .8 1.0 .3 .1
control file sequential re 7405 100.0 .0
cursor: pin S 10 10.0 90.0
db file async I/O submit 9556 99.9 .0 .0 .0
db file parallel read 1 100.0
db file parallel write 9556 62.0 32.4 1.7 .8 1.5 1.3 .1
db file scattered read 345 72.8 3.8 2.3 11.6 9.0 .6
db file sequential read 6199 97.2 .2 .3 1.6 .7 .0 .0
direct path read 7699 99.1 .4 .2 .1 .1 .0
direct path sync 8 25.0 37.5 12.5 25.0
direct path write 13K 97.8 .9 .5 .4 .3 .1 .0
enq: TX - row lock content 4480 .4 .7 1.3 3.0 6.8 12.3 75.4 .1
latch free 301 98.3 .3 .7 .7
latch: In memory undo latc 15 93.3 6.7
latch: active service list 1 100.0
latch: cache buffers chain 55 94.5 3.6 1.8
latch: cache buffers lru c 9 88.9 11.1
latch: call allocation 6 100.0
latch: checkpoint queue la 3 100.0
latch: enqueue hash chains 45 97.8 2.2
latch: messages 4 100.0
latch: object queue header 7 85.7 14.3
latch: redo allocation 113 97.3 1.8 .9
latch: row cache objects 19 89.5 5.3 5.3
latch: session allocation 5 80.0 20.0
latch: shared pool 147 90.5 1.4 2.7 1.4 .7 1.4 2.0
latch: undo global data 8 100.0
library cache: mutex X 28 89.3 3.6 3.6 3.6
log file parallel write 299K 95.6 2.6 1.0 .4 .3 .2 .0
log file sequential read 698 29.5 .1 4.6 46.8 18.9
log file single write 56 100.0
log file switch (checkpoin 4 25.0 50.0 25.0
log file switch (private s 8 12.5 37.5 50.0
log file sync 284K 93.3 3.7 1.4 .7 .5 .3 .1
os thread startup 146 100.0
row cache lock 41 85.4 9.8 2.4 2.4
DIAG idle wait 7184 100.0
SQL*Net message from clien 6379K 86.6 5.1 2.9 1.3 .7 .3 2.8 .3
SQL*Net message to client 6375K 100.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: XXXX/xxxx Snaps: 5635-5636
-> Total Waits - units: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits - column heading: <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> % of Waits - value: .0 indicates value was <.05%, null is truly 0
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
Total ----------------- % of Waits ------------------
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
SQL*Net more data from cli 7976 99.7 .1 .1 .0 .1
Space Manager: slave idle 4086 .1 .2 .0 .0 .3 3.2 96.1
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 258 49.2 .8 50.0
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 129 100.0
Streams AQ: waiting for ti 2 50.0 50.0
class slave wait 28 92.9 3.6 3.6
jobq slave wait 7270 .0 100.0
pmon timer 1199 100.0
rdbms ipc message 314K 10.3 7.3 39.7 15.4 10.6 5.3 8.2 3.3
smon timer 43 100.0 -
Hi,
How should i analyze my statspack report. what are major attributes whihc i should concentrate more in analyzing the SP report.
Thankx.....After checking the generic hit ratios section,
Check the top 5 wait events and most expensive SQL queries.
Oracle Performance Tuning Guide has good explanation on most common wait events.
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14211/toc.htm
also try upload your result to here
http://oraperf.com/ -
Performance(statspack) related problem
Anybodyu can suggest me how to improve the database performance as many uiser are complaining that they are getting data very slow........
i have also used statspack analyzer.......
STATSPACK report for
DB Name DB Id Instance Inst Num Release Cluster Host
NEOSOFT 399087012 neosoft 1 9.2.0.7.0 NO APP
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess Comment
Begin Snap: 1 16-May-08 10:20:15 435 2.2
End Snap: 3 16-May-08 10:24:12 442 2.2
Elapsed: 3.95 (mins)
Cache Sizes (end)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Cache: 352M Std Block Size: 8K
Shared Pool Size: 200M Log Buffer: 1,024K
Load Profile
~~~~~~~~~~~~ Per Second Per Transaction
Redo size: 23,125.82 7,966.31
Logical reads: 6,050.15 2,084.14
Block changes: 96.53 33.25
Physical reads: 1,103.40 380.10
Physical writes: 16.60 5.72
User calls: 189.40 65.24
Parses: 29.92 10.31
Hard parses: 8.69 2.99
Sorts: 6.97 2.40
Logons: 0.11 0.04
Executes: 29.25 10.08
Transactions: 2.90
% Blocks changed per Read: 1.60 Recursive Call %: 31.70
Rollback per transaction %: 0.29 Rows per Sort: 472.41
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 100.00 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 82.01 In-memory Sort %: 99.21
Library Hit %: 89.76 Soft Parse %: 70.95
Execute to Parse %: -2.29 Latch Hit %: 99.95
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 100.93 % Non-Parse CPU: 84.62
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 94.72 94.24
% SQL with executions>1: 39.68 38.62
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 39.34 38.76
Top 5 Timed Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total
Event Waits Time (s) Ela Time
db file scattered read 39,162 38 39.49
CPU time 28 29.48
db file sequential read 42,173 28 29.24
direct path read 1,193 1 .59
SQL*Net more data to client 31,629 1 .53
Wait Events for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> s - second
-> cs - centisecond - 100th of a second
-> ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> us - microsecond - 1000000th of a second
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
db file scattered read 39,162 0 38 1 56.9
db file sequential read 42,173 0 28 1 61.3
direct path read 1,193 0 1 0 1.7
SQL*Net more data to client 31,629 0 1 0 46.0
log file sync 683 0 0 0 1.0
control file sequential read 184 0 0 1 0.3
db file parallel write 61 0 0 1 0.1
control file parallel write 78 0 0 0 0.1
log file parallel write 732 0 0 0 1.1
direct path write 30 0 0 0 0.0
SQL*Net break/reset to clien 10 0 0 0 0.0
LGWR wait for redo copy 3 0 0 0 0.0
SQL*Net message from client 44,675 0 577 13 64.9
virtual circuit status 47,524 4 145 3 69.1
SQL*Net message to client 44,674 0 0 0 64.9
SQL*Net more data from clien 260 0 0 0 0.4
Background Wait Events for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
control file sequential read 80 0 0 2 0.1
db file parallel write 61 0 0 1 0.1
control file parallel write 78 0 0 0 0.1
log file parallel write 732 0 0 0 1.1
LGWR wait for redo copy 3 0 0 0 0.0
rdbms ipc message 993 242 2,054 2069 1.4
pmon timer 79 79 234 2962 0.1
smon timer 13 0 228 17520 0.0
SQL ordered by Gets for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Buffer Gets Threshold: 10000
-> Note that resources reported for PL/SQL includes the resources used by
all SQL statements called within the PL/SQL code. As individual SQL
statements are also reported, it is possible and valid for the summed
total % to exceed 100
CPU Elapsd
Buffer Gets Executions Gets per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
92,160 36 2,560.0 6.4 0.41 0.37 1007205397
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
75,042 33 2,274.0 5.2 0.23 0.29 3052506495
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
68,310 27 2,530.0 4.8 0.27 0.27 2037438344
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
48,617 31 1,568.3 3.4 0.16 0.22 1186386010
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
45,060 20 2,253.0 3.1 0.17 0.18 3400961035
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
42,976 17 2,528.0 3.0 0.14 0.17 3744553745
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
36,114 78 463.0 2.5 0.13 0.11 4262998487
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
SQL ordered by Gets for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Buffer Gets Threshold: 10000
-> Note that resources reported for PL/SQL includes the resources used by
all SQL statements called within the PL/SQL code. As individual SQL
statements are also reported, it is possible and valid for the summed
total % to exceed 100
CPU Elapsd
Buffer Gets Executions Gets per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'IP' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'DOCTORVISIT' escape '
25,102 11 2,282.0 1.8 0.06 0.10 812077776
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
24,984 36 694.0 1.7 0.09 0.07 3956499023
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'INVENTORY' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'DMEDMAST' esca
23,213 1 23,213.0 1.6 1.59 2.83 2435229694
Module: SQL*Plus
BEGIN statspack.snap(i_snap_level=>7); END;
22,930 10 2,293.0 1.6 0.14 0.09 3466778893
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
22,680 10 2,268.0 1.6 0.08 0.09 3786189544
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
20,340 9 2,260.0 1.4 0.13 0.08 3649693145
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
SQL ordered by Gets for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Buffer Gets Threshold: 10000
-> Note that resources reported for PL/SQL includes the resources used by
all SQL statements called within the PL/SQL code. As individual SQL
statements are also reported, it is possible and valid for the summed
total % to exceed 100
CPU Elapsd
Buffer Gets Executions Gets per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
19,460 42 463.3 1.4 0.09 0.06 3858576624
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
SQL ordered by Reads for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Disk Reads Threshold: 1000
CPU Elapsd
Physical Reads Executions Reads per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
8,084 4 2,021.0 3.1 0.14 1.08 4198744706
Module: Out Patient 2.1.41.exe
Select Max(BillNo) as Bno From PatientsRegistration Where regdt
= to_date('01/04/2008','dd/mm/yyyy') and regdt <= to_date('31/03/2009','dd/mm/yyyy')
7,302 1 7,302.0 2.8 0.13 0.51 2116660478
Module: In Patient 2.1.157.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PA
T09212'
7,302 1 7,302.0 2.8 0.06 0.41 3612969128
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PA
T09037'
7,302 1 7,302.0 2.8 0.19 0.51 3981413559
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
sELECT * FROM BillPharmacy WHERE BillPharmacy.pATIENtid= 'PAT090
37' order by to_number((issueno))
7,300 1 7,300.0 2.8 0.14 0.69 136284863
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
delete from billpharmacy where patientid='PAT09037'
7,299 1 7,299.0 2.8 0.20 0.77 2137420337
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
delete from billpharmacy where patientid='PAT09154'
7,298 1 7,298.0 2.8 0.13 0.43 1007690124
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PA
T08301'
7,298 1 7,298.0 2.8 0.13 0.58 3087447381
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PA
T09154'
7,061 1 7,061.0 2.7 0.13 0.97 2993688253
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PA
T09146'
7,058 1 7,058.0 2.7 0.39 0.76 1202603169
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
SELECT BILLHDR.BILLNO, BILLHDR.BILLDT, BILLHDR.BALANCE, BILLHDR.
TOTAL, BILLHDR.NETAMOUNT,IPINFO.type as orgtype, BILLHDR.PREVAD
V , IPInfo.IpNO, IPInfo.REGDT,IPInfo.REGTM, IPInfo.Name, IPInfo.
ADDRESS1,IPINFO.relativenm ,Rooms.roomno , Beds.BEDNO, ROOMTYPES
, decode(IPINFO.sex,1,'Male','Female')sex,IPINFO.AGE ||' '||dec
6,640 1 6,640.0 2.5 0.13 1.06 796742944
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
SQL ordered by Reads for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Disk Reads Threshold: 1000
CPU Elapsd
Physical Reads Executions Reads per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PA
T09123'
4,617 4 1,154.3 1.8 0.19 0.94 2042905630
Module: Out Patient 2.1.41.exe
SELECT NVL(Max(MoneyReciept.mrBillNo),0) AS MaxOfBillNob FROM Mo
neyReciept where generalopd = 0
4,496 3 1,498.7 1.7 0.06 0.57 2718453880
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select * from track where tablenm = 'FRMREPORTING' and primkeyid
= 'R208970TS000002' order by trackdate,tracktime
4,494 3 1,498.0 1.7 0.13 0.74 3290276624
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select * from track where tablenm = 'FRMREPORTING' and primkeyid
= 'R207032T0000351' order by trackdate,tracktime
4,451 3 1,483.7 1.7 0.20 0.99 768943678
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select * from track where tablenm = 'FRMREPORTING' and primkeyid
= 'R208613TS000002' order by trackdate,tracktime
4,091 4 1,022.8 1.6 0.19 1.62 266509601
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
SELECT IPInfo.IPNo ,IPInfo.name,doctorvisit.date_r ,unithdr.drna
me , doctorvisit.visitid FROM Doctorvisit , IPInfo,unithdr wher
e Doctorvisit.Patid = IPInfo.PatID and Doctorvisit.doctorid=unit
hdr.unitid and doctorvisit.date_r >=to_date('06/05/2008','fmdd/m
m/yyyy') order by IPInfo.IPNo
3,933 5 786.6 1.5 0.14 1.29 2546712787
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select max(BillNo) as Bno From MoneyReciept where rcdt >= to_dat
e('01/04/2008','dd/mm/yyyy') and rcdt <= to_date('31/03/2009','d
d/mm/yyyy')
3,439 3 1,146.3 1.3 0.25 1.89 2816864569
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select * from track where tablenm = 'FRMREPORTING' and primkeyid
= 'R207242T0000104' order by trackdate,tracktime
3,129 2 1,564.5 1.2 0.06 0.88 1803349496
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select * from track where tablenm = 'FRMREPORTING' and primkeyid
= 'R208962TS000002' order by trackdate,tracktime
3,065 4 766.3 1.2 0.17 1.30 54282346
Module: In Patient 2.1.157.exe
Select * from track where tablenm = 'FRMDOCTORVISIT' and primkey
id = 'VI048354' order by trackdate,tracktime
2,834 3 944.7 1.1 0.17 1.57 165470279
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
SQL ordered by Reads for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Disk Reads Threshold: 1000
CPU Elapsd
Physical Reads Executions Reads per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
Select * from track where tablenm = 'FRMREPORTING' and primkeyid
= 'R208926TS000002' order by trackdate,tracktime
2,769 3 923.0 1.1 0.13 1.28 3812904405
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select * from track where tablenm = 'FRMREPORTING' and primkeyid
= 'R208892TS000002' order by trackdate,tracktime
2,730 3 910.0 1.0 0.19 1.21 680462328
Module: In Patient 2.1.157.exe
select * from DoctorVisit where Date_r >= to_date('06/05/2008','
dd/mm/yyyy') and Date_r <= to_date('16/05/2008','dd/mm/yyyy')
2,526 2 1,263.0 1.0 0.58 1.14 4043595143
Module: SQL*Plus
INSERT INTO STATS$SQL_SUMMARY ( SNAP_ID , DBID , INSTANCE_NUMBER
, TEXT_SUBSET , SHARABLE_MEM , SORTS , MODULE , LOADED_VERSIONS
, FETCHES , EXECUTIONS , LOADS , INVALIDATIONS , PARSE_CALLS ,
DISK_READS , BUFFER_GETS , ROWS_PROCESSED , COMMAND_TYPE , ADDRE
SS , HASH_VALUE , VERSION_COUNT , CPU_TIME , ELAPSED_TIME , OUTL
2,484 1 2,484.0 0.9 0.19 0.91 33028691
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
select * from requisitions where upper(reqno) = '180800'
2,483 1 2,483.0 0.9 0.13 0.93 2943168498
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Update Requisitions Set Collected = 0 Where TRIM(ReqID) ='R20987
8'
2,482 1 2,482.0 0.9 0.11 0.74 2336722822
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Update Requisitions Set Collected = 0 Where TRIM(ReqID) ='R20987
7'
2,480 1 2,480.0 0.9 0.06 0.67 650704065
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select sum(can.returnamt) refamt from diagnotech.cancellationhd
r can,diagnotech.requisitions req where can.reqid = req.reqid an
SQL ordered by Executions for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Executions Threshold: 100
CPU per Elap per
Executions Rows Processed Rows per Exec Exec (s) Exec (s) Hash Value
283 283 1.0 0.00 0.00 1283498366
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select to_char(sysdate,'fmdd/mm/yyyy HH24:mi:ss am') as abc from
OPTIONS
238 76 0.3 0.00 0.00 4274598960
select /*+ rule */ bucket_cnt, row_cnt, cache_cnt, null_cnt, tim
estamp#, sample_size, minimum, maximum, distcnt, lowval, hival,
density, col#, spare1, spare2, avgcln from hist_head$ where obj#
=:1 and intcol#=:2
126 126 1.0 0.00 0.00 2168100061
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
select * from departments where deptid = 'DEP00004'
114 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 4073347083
select grantor#, grantee#, privilege#, sequence#, nvl(option$,0)
from objauth$ where obj#=:1 and col#=:2
112 112 1.0 0.00 0.00 3687727603
insert into col$(obj#,name,intcol#,segcol#,type#,length,precisio
n#,scale,null$,offset,fixedstorage,segcollength,deflength,defaul
t$,col#,property,charsetid,charsetform,spare1,spare2,spare3)valu
es(:1,:2,:3,:4,:5,:6,decode(:7,0,null,:7),decode(:5,2,decode(:8,
-127/*MAXSB1MINAL*/,null,:8),178,:8,179,:8,180,:8,181,:8,182,:8,
99 99 1.0 0.00 0.00 3468666020
select text from view$ where rowid=:1
84 84 1.0 0.00 0.00 2997854589
insert into access$(d_obj#,order#,columns,types) values (:1,:2,:
3,:4)
84 84 1.0 0.00 0.00 3951809012
insert into dependency$(d_obj#,d_timestamp,order#,p_obj#,p_times
tamp,d_owner#, property)values (:1,:2,:3,:4,:5,:6, :7)
78 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 3867936055
Module: Out Patient 2.1.41.exe
commit
78 78 1.0 0.00 0.00 4262998487
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'IP' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'DOCTORVISIT' escape '
44 44 1.0 0.00 0.00 3216099004
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
select * from options
42 42 1.0 0.00 0.00 3858576624
SQL ordered by Executions for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Executions Threshold: 100
CPU per Elap per
Executions Rows Processed Rows per Exec Exec (s) Exec (s) Hash Value
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'IP' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'IPINFO' escape '\'
36 540 15.0 0.01 0.01 1007205397
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
36 36 1.0 0.00 0.00 3956499023
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'INVENTORY' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'DMEDMAST' esca
34 34 1.0 0.00 0.00 857250417
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.46.exe
select * from departments where deptid = 'DEP00031'
33 43,442 1,316.4 0.04 0.05 502973950
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
SELECT substr(UPPER(MedMast.MedNm),1,50) MedNm , MedSubCat.MSCOD
E ,MEDMAST.POTENCY ,substr(genericnm,1,50) genericnm, sum(dmeddt
ls.currqty) stock, MedMast.medid FROM MedMast , MedSubCat,dmedd
tls where UPPER(MEDMAST.MEDNM) LIKE '%%' and medmast.medid = d
meddtls.medid and MEDMAST.SubCatID = MedSubCat.MSCatID and dmed
33 132 4.0 0.01 0.01 3052506495
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
31 124 4.0 0.01 0.01 1186386010
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
31 31 1.0 0.00 0.00 3993731530
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
SQL ordered by Executions for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Executions Threshold: 100
CPU per Elap per
Executions Rows Processed Rows per Exec Exec (s) Exec (s) Hash Value
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'OTS1' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'DOCTORINFO' escape
28 28 1.0 0.00 0.00 737183288
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select * From CReqno
27 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 246231567
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
SQL ordered by Parse Calls for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Parse Calls Threshold: 1000
% Total
Parse Calls Executions Parses Hash Value
283 283 3.99 1283498366
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select to_char(sysdate,'fmdd/mm/yyyy HH24:mi:ss am') as abc from
OPTIONS
126 126 1.78 2168100061
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
select * from departments where deptid = 'DEP00004'
99 99 1.40 3468666020
select text from view$ where rowid=:1
78 78 1.10 3867936055
Module: Out Patient 2.1.41.exe
commit
78 78 1.10 4262998487
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'IP' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'DOCTORVISIT' escape '
44 44 0.62 3216099004
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
select * from options
42 42 0.59 3858576624
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'IP' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'IPINFO' escape '\'
36 36 0.51 1007205397
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
36 36 0.51 3956499023
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'INVENTORY' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'DMEDMAST' esca
34 34 0.48 857250417
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.46.exe
SQL ordered by Parse Calls for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Parse Calls Threshold: 1000
% Total
Parse Calls Executions Parses Hash Value
select * from departments where deptid = 'DEP00031'
33 33 0.47 502973950
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
SELECT substr(UPPER(MedMast.MedNm),1,50) MedNm , MedSubCat.MSCOD
E ,MEDMAST.POTENCY ,substr(genericnm,1,50) genericnm, sum(dmeddt
ls.currqty) stock, MedMast.medid FROM MedMast , MedSubCat,dmedd
tls where UPPER(MEDMAST.MEDNM) LIKE '%%' and medmast.medid = d
meddtls.medid and MEDMAST.SubCatID = MedSubCat.MSCatID and dmed
33 33 0.47 3052506495
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
31 31 0.44 1186386010
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
31 31 0.44 3993731530
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'OTS1' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'DOCTORINFO' escape
30 15 0.42 3067006941
delete from dependency$ where d_obj#=:1
28 28 0.39 737183288
Module: Diagnotech 2.2.49.exe
Select * From CReqno
27 27 0.38 246231567
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select to_char(null), ac.owner, ac.table_name, acc.column_name,
acc.position, ac.constraint_name from all_constraints ac, all_co
ns_columns acc where ac.owner=acc.owner and ac.constraint_type=
'P' and ac.constraint_name=acc.constraint_name and ac.owner lik
e 'INVENTORY' escape '\' and ac.table_name like 'DISSUEDTLSP' e
27 27 0.38 445844524
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select nvl(tarrifflg,0) as tf from sourcehdr where sourceid = ''
SQL ordered by Parse Calls for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Parse Calls Threshold: 1000
% Total
Parse Calls Executions Parses Hash Value
27 27 0.38 2037438344
Module: Pharmacy 2.0.174.exe
select null, i.owner, i.table_name, decode (i.uniqueness,'UNIQUE
',0,1), null, i.index_name, 3, c.column_position, c.column_name,
'A', i.distinct_keys, i.leaf_blocks, null from all_indexes i, a
ll_ind_columns c where i.owner = c.index_owner and i.index_name
= c.index_name and i.table_owner = c.table_owner and i.table_nam
22 22 0.31 3073477137
select u.name,o.name, t.update$, t.insert$, t.delete$, t.enabled
from obj$ o,user$ u,trigger$ t where t.baseobject=:1 and t.ob
j#=o.obj# and o.owner#=u.user# order by o.obj#
Instance Activity Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
CPU used by this session 2,821 11.9 4.1
CPU used when call started 2,826 11.9 4.1
CR blocks created 15 0.1 0.0
DBWR buffers scanned 5,873 24.8 8.5
DBWR checkpoint buffers written 167 0.7 0.2
DBWR checkpoints 0 0.0 0.0
DBWR free buffers found 5,653 23.9 8.2
DBWR lru scans 17 0.1 0.0
DBWR make free requests 17 0.1 0.0
DBWR summed scan depth 5,873 24.8 8.5
DBWR transaction table writes 1 0.0 0.0
DBWR undo block writes 228 1.0 0.3
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 89,026 375.6 129.4
active txn count during cleanout 156 0.7 0.2
background checkpoints completed 0 0.0 0.0
background checkpoints started 0 0.0 0.0
background timeouts 243 1.0 0.4
branch node splits 0 0.0 0.0
buffer is not pinned count 1,225,066 5,169.1 1,780.6
buffer is pinned count 1,069,472 4,512.5 1,554.5
bytes received via SQL*Net from c 4,334,045 18,287.1 6,299.5
bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 79,310,906 334,645.2 115,277.5
calls to get snapshot scn: kcmgss 14,976 63.2 21.8
calls to kcmgas 942 4.0 1.4
calls to kcmgcs 166 0.7 0.2
change write time 19 0.1 0.0
cleanout - number of ktugct calls 182 0.8 0.3
cleanouts and rollbacks - consist 5 0.0 0.0
cleanouts only - consistent read 18 0.1 0.0
cluster key scan block gets 206,010 869.2 299.4
cluster key scans 81,803 345.2 118.9
commit cleanout failures: block l 0 0.0 0.0
commit cleanout failures: callbac 11 0.1 0.0
commit cleanout failures: cannot 0 0.0 0.0
commit cleanouts 2,731 11.5 4.0
commit cleanouts successfully com 2,720 11.5 4.0
commit txn count during cleanout 87 0.4 0.1
consistent changes 15 0.1 0.0
consistent gets 1,412,564 5,960.2 2,053.2
consistent gets - examination 572,440 2,415.4 832.0
cursor authentications 531 2.2 0.8
data blocks consistent reads - un 15 0.1 0.0
db block changes 22,877 96.5 33.3
db block gets 21,323 90.0 31.0
deferred (CURRENT) block cleanout 1,548 6.5 2.3
dirty buffers inspected 19 0.1 0.0
enqueue conversions 52 0.2 0.1
enqueue releases 4,639 19.6 6.7
enqueue requests 4,640 19.6 6.7
enqueue timeouts 0 0.0 0.0
enqueue waits 0 0.0 0.0
execute count 6,932 29.3 10.1
free buffer inspected 19 0.1 0.0
free buffer requested 258,870 1,092.3 376.3
hot buffers moved to head of LRU 2,520 10.6 3.7
immediate (CR) block cleanout app 23 0.1 0.0
Instance Activity Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
immediate (CURRENT) block cleanou 502 2.1 0.7
index fast full scans (full) 163 0.7 0.2
index fetch by key 380,673 1,606.2 553.3
index scans kdiixs1 86,708 365.9 126.0
leaf node 90-10 splits 22 0.1 0.0
leaf node splits 64 0.3 0.1
logons cumulative 25 0.1 0.0
messages received 806 3.4 1.2
messages sent 806 3.4 1.2
no buffer to keep pinned count 0 0.0 0.0
no work - consistent read gets 779,017 3,287.0 1,132.3
opened cursors cumulative 7,669 32.4 11.2
parse count (failures) 2 0.0 0.0
parse count (hard) 2,060 8.7 3.0
parse count (total) 7,091 29.9 10.3
parse time cpu 434 1.8 0.6
parse time elapsed 430 1.8 0.6
physical reads 261,506 1,103.4 380.1
physical reads direct 3,529 14.9 5.1
physical writes 3,935 16.6 5.7
physical writes direct 3,529 14.9 5.1
physical writes non checkpoint 3,839 16.2 5.6
pinned buffers inspected 0 0.0 0.0
prefetched blocks 175,966 742.5 255.8
prefetched blocks aged out before 0 0.0 0.0
process last non-idle time 270 1.1 0.4
recovery blocks read 0 0.0 0.0
recursive calls 20,832 87.9 30.3
recursive cpu usage 296 1.3 0.4
redo blocks written 11,309 47.7 16.4
redo buffer allocation retries 0 0.0 0.0
redo entries 12,097 51.0 17.6
redo log space requests 0 0.0 0.0
redo log space wait time 0 0.0 0.0
redo ordering marks 1 0.0 0.0
redo size 5,480,820 23,125.8 7,966.3
redo synch time 30 0.1 0.0
redo synch writes 689 2.9 1.0
redo wastage 160,348 676.6 233.1
redo write time 29 0.1 0.0
redo writer latching time 0 0.0 0.0
redo writes 732 3.1 1.1
rollback changes - undo records a 2 0.0 0.0
rollbacks only - consistent read 10 0.0 0.0
rows fetched via callback 235,269 992.7 342.0
session connect time 0 0.0 0.0
session logical reads 1,433,886 6,050.2 2,084.1
session pga memory 45,074,044 190,185.8 65,514.6
session pga memory max 49,946,024 210,742.7 72,596.0
session uga memory max 3,455,708 14,581.1 5,022.8
shared hash latch upgrades - no w 54,598 230.4 79.4
shared hash latch upgrades - wait 0 0.0 0.0
sorts (disk) 13 0.1 0.0
sorts (memory) 1,639 6.9 2.4
sorts (rows) 780,425 3,292.9 1,134.3
summed dirty queue length 239 1.0 0.4
Instance Activity Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
switch current to new buffer 172 0.7 0.3
table fetch by rowid 612,799 2,585.7 890.7
table fetch continued row 626 2.6 0.9
table scan blocks gotten 459,367 1,938.3 667.7
table scan rows gotten 18,523,828 78,159.6 26,924.2
table scans (long tables) 128 0.5 0.2
table scans (short tables) 1,655 7.0 2.4
transaction rollbacks 1 0.0 0.0
transaction tables consistent rea 0 0.0 0.0
transaction tables consistent rea 0 0.0 0.0
user calls 44,888 189.4 65.2
user commits 686 2.9 1.0
user rollbacks 2 0.0 0.0
workarea executions - multipass 0 0.0 0.0
workarea executions - onepass 24 0.1 0.0
workarea executions - optimal 2,433 10.3 3.5
write clones created in foregroun 0 0.0 0.0
Tablespace IO Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
->ordered by IOs (Reads + Writes) desc
Tablespace
Av Av Av Av Buffer Av Buf
Reads Reads/s Rd(ms) Blks/Rd Writes Writes/s Waits Wt(ms)
DIAGNOTECH
61,945 261 0.7 1.9 64 0 0 0.0
IP
10,753 45 1.2 9.5 23 0 0 0.0
SYSTEM
5,668 24 1.2 3.2 22 0 0 0.0
OTS1
2,456 10 1.5 7.8 19 0 0 0.0
TEMP
1,429 6 0.6 2.5 739 3 0 0.0
INVENTORY
478 2 3.5 1.3 49 0 0 0.0
UNDOTBS1
0 0 0.0 229 1 0 0.0
INDX
15 0 2.0 1.0 0 0 0 0.0
PAYROLL
1 0 20.0 4.0 0 0 0 0.0
File IO Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
->ordered by Tablespace, File
Tablespace Filename
Av Av Av Av Buffer Av Buf
Reads Reads/s Rd(ms) Blks/Rd Writes Writes/s Waits Wt(ms)
DIAGNOTECH F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\NEOSOFT\DIAGNOTECH1.ORA
61,945 261 0.7 1.9 64 0 0
INDX F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\NEOSOFT\INDX01.DBF
15 0 2.0 1.0 0 0 0
INVENTORY F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\NEOSOFT\INVENTORY1.ORA
478 2 3.5 1.3 49 0 0
IP F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\NEOSOFT\IP1.ORA
10,753 45 1.2 9.5 23 0 0
OTS1 F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\NEOSOFT\OTS11.ORA
2,456 10 1.5 7.8 19 0 0
PAYROLL F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\NEOSOFT\PAYROLL1.ORA
1 0 20.0 4.0 0 0 0
SYSTEM F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\NEOSOFT\SYSTEM01.DBF
5,668 24 1.2 3.2 22 0 0
TEMP F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\NEOSOFT\TEMP01.DBF
1,429 6 0.6 2.5 739 3 0
UNDOTBS1 F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\NEOSOFT\UNDOTBS01.DBF
0 0 229 1 0
Buffer Pool Statistics for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> Standard block size Pools D: default, K: keep, R: recycle
-> Default Pools for other block sizes: 2k, 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k
Free Write Buffer
Number of Cache Buffer Physical Physical Buffer Complete Busy
P Buffers Hit % Gets Reads Writes Waits Waits Waits
D 44,044 82.0 1,432,475 257,328 406 0 0 0
Instance Recovery Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> B: Begin snapshot, E: End snapshot
Targt Estd Log File Log Ckpt Log Ckpt
MTTR MTTR Recovery Actual Target Size Timeout Interval
(s) (s) Estd IOs Redo Blks Redo Blks Redo Blks Redo Blks Redo Blks
B 87 19 3628 65684 64450 184320 64450
E 87 20 4063 69805 69805 184320 69805
Buffer Pool Advisory for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft End Snap: 3
-> Only rows with estimated physical reads >0 are displayed
-> ordered by Block Size, Buffers For Estimate (default block size first)
Size for Size Buffers for Est Physical Estimated
P Estimate (M) Factr Estimate Read Factor Physical Reads
D 32 .1 4,004 67.25 19,260,129,810
D 64 .2 8,008 42.95 12,300,910,895
D 96 .3 12,012 32.00 9,165,118,680
D 128 .4 16,016 25.62 7,338,010,607
D 160 .5 20,020 17.54 5,022,366,182
D 192 .5 24,024 11.74 3,361,228,965
D 224 .6 28,028 7.05 2,020,169,694
D 256 .7 32,032 3.94 1,127,930,012
D 288 .8 36,036 2.32 663,835,521
D 320 .9 40,040 1.44 413,674,540
D 352 1.0 44,044 1.00 286,377,525
D 384 1.1 48,048 0.75 215,831,108
D 416 1.2 52,052 0.60 171,670,371
D 448 1.3 56,056 0.51 145,708,247
D 480 1.4 60,060 0.45 128,439,943
D 512 1.5 64,064 0.40 114,053,332
D 544 1.5 68,068 0.37 104,584,674
D 576 1.6 72,072 0.34 96,792,591
D 608 1.7 76,076 0.32 92,596,531
D 640 1.8 80,080 0.31 89,929,979
PGA Aggr Target Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> B: Begin snap E: End snap (rows dentified with B or E contain data
which is absolute i.e. not diffed over the interval)
-> PGA cache hit % - percentage of W/A (WorkArea) data processed only in-memory
-> Auto PGA Target - actual workarea memory target
-> W/A PGA Used - amount of memory used for all Workareas (manual + auto)
-> %PGA W/A Mem - percentage of PGA memory allocated to workareas
-> %Auto W/A Mem - percentage of workarea memory controlled by Auto Mem Mgmt
-> %Man W/A Mem - percentage of workarea memory under manual control
PGA Cache Hit % W/A MB Processed Extra W/A MB Read/Written
88.2 213 29
%PGA %Auto %Man
PGA Aggr Auto PGA PGA Mem W/A PGA W/A W/A W/A Global Mem
Target(M) Target(M) Alloc(M) Used(M) Mem Mem Mem Bound(K)
B 24 7 24.4 0.4 1.6 .0 100.0 1,228
E 24 8 23.8 0.0 .0 .0 .0 1,228
PGA Aggr Target Histogram for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> Optimal Executions are purely in-memory operations
Low High
Optimal Optimal Total Execs Optimal Execs 1-Pass Execs M-Pass Execs
8K 16K 2,000 2,000 0 0
16K 32K 55 55 0 0
32K 64K 28 28 0 0
64K 128K 50 50 0 0
128K 256K 110 110 0 0
256K 512K 26 26 0 0
512K 1024K 176 158 18 0
1M 2M 8 4 4 0
4M 8M 2 0 2 0
PGA Memory Advisory for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft End Snap: 3
-> When using Auto Memory Mgmt, minimally choose a pga_aggregate_target value
where Estd PGA Overalloc Count is 0
Estd Extra Estd PGA Estd PGA
PGA Target Size W/A MB W/A MB Read/ Cache Overalloc
Est (MB) Factr Processed Written to Disk Hit % Count
12 0.5 417.1 207.2 67.0 1
18 0.8 417.1 89.3 82.0 0
24 1.0 417.1 46.4 90.0 0
29 1.2 417.1 46.4 90.0 0
34 1.4 417.1 46.4 90.0 0
38 1.6 417.1 13.2 97.0 0
43 1.8 417.1 11.1 97.0 0
48 2.0 417.1 11.1 97.0 0
72 3.0 417.1 11.1 97.0 0
96 4.0 417.1 11.1 97.0 0
144 6.0 417.1 0.0 100.0 0
192 8.0 417.1 0.0 100.0 0
Rollback Segment Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
->A high value for "Pct Waits" suggests more rollback segments may be required
->RBS stats may not be accurate between begin and end snaps when using Auto Undo
managment, as RBS may be dynamically created and dropped as needed
Trans Table Pct Undo Bytes
RBS No Gets Waits Written Wraps Shrinks Extends
0 15.0 0.00 0 0 0 0
1 412.0 0.00 831,990 1 0 1
2 48.0 0.00 61,500 0 0 0
3 87.0 0.00 132,404 0 0 0
4 79.0 0.00 66,626 0 0 0
5 71.0 0.00 91,284 0 0 0
6 40.0 0.00 15,474 0 0 0
7 660.0 0.00 547,536 1 0 1
8 168.0 0.00 21,762 0 0 0
9 86.0 0.00 10,108 0 0 0
10 295.0 0.00 156,468 0 0 0
Rollback Segment Storage for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
->Optimal Size should be larger than Avg Active
RBS No Segment Size Avg Active Optimal Size Maximum Size
0 385,024 0 385,024
1 9,625,600 806,999 16,900,096
2 5,365,760 711,094 8,511,488
3 5,365,760 664,381 9,560,064
4 5,365,760 763,735 8,511,488
5 5,365,760 672,648 9,625,600
6 5,365,760 677,906 9,560,064
7 6,414,336 647,093 8,511,488
8 5,365,760 628,652 10,608,640
9 5,365,760 769,325 9,560,064
10 5,365,760 622,015 9,560,064
Undo Segment Summary for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> Undo segment block stats:
-> uS - unexpired Stolen, uR - unexpired Released, uU - unexpired reUsed
-> eS - expired Stolen, eR - expired Released, eU - expired reUsed
Undo Undo Num Max Qry Max Tx Snapshot Out of uS/uR/uU/
TS# Blocks Trans Len (s) Concurcy Too Old Space eS/eR/eU
1 695 1,032,965 12 1 0 0 0/0/0/0/0/0
Undo Segment Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> ordered by Time desc
Undo Num Max Qry Max Tx Snap Out of uS/uR/uU/
End Time Blocks Trans Len (s) Concy Too Old Space eS/eR/eU
16-May 10:22 695 ######## 12 1 0 0 0/0/0/0/0/0
Latch Activity for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
->"Get Requests", "Pct Get Miss" and "Avg Slps/Miss" are statistics for
willing-to-wait latch get requests
->"NoWait Requests", "Pct NoWait Miss" are for no-wait latch get requests
->"Pct Misses" for both should be very close to 0.0
Pct Avg Wait Pct
Get Get Slps Time NoWait NoWait
Latch Requests Miss /Miss (s) Requests Miss
Consistent RBA 732 0.0 0 0
FAL request queue 1 0.0 0 0
FIB s.o chain latch 12 0.0 0 0
FOB s.o list latch 27 0.0 0 0
SQL memory manager latch 2 0.0 0 79 0.0
SQL memory manager worka 7,245 0.0 0 0
active checkpoint queue 169 0.0 0 0
archive control 10 0.0 0 0
archive process latch 7 0.0 0 0
cache buffer handles 12,078 0.0 0 0
cache buffers chains 2,602,999 0.0 0.0 0 506,781 0.0
cache buffers lru chain 858 0.0 0 615,593 0.0
channel handle pool latc 37 0.0 0 0
channel operations paren 265 0.0 0 0
checkpoint queue latch 30,545 0.0 0 893 0.0
child cursor hash table 16,079 0.0 0 0
dml lock allocation 2,674 0.0 0 0
dummy allocation 43 0.0 0 0
enqueue hash chains 9,313 0.0 0 0
enqueues 9,405 0.0 0 0
event group latch 5 0.0 0 0
hash table column usage 0 0 55,565 0.0
hash table modification 1 0.0 0 0
kmcptab latch 78 0.0 0 0
kmcpvec latch 0 0 78 0.0
ktm global data 13 0.0 0 0
lgwr LWN SCN 742 0.0 0 0
library cache 193,957 0.0 0.0 0 6,959 0.4
library cache load lock 110 0.0 0 0
library cache pin 63,420 0.0 0 0
library cache pin alloca 43,208 0.0 0 0
list of block allocation 49 0.0 0 0
loader state object free 34 0.0 0 0
message pool operations 26 0.0 0 0
messages 2,866 0.0 0 0
mostly latch-free SCN 742 0.0 0 0
multiblock read objects 164,572 0.0 0.0 0 0
ncodef allocation latch 3 0.0 0 0
object stats modificatio 1,669 0.0 0 0
post/wait queue 1,029 0.0 0 683 0.0
process allocation 11 0.0 0 5 0.0
process group creation 11 0.0 0 0
redo allocation 13,617 0.0 0.0 0 0
redo copy 0 0 12,145 0.0
redo writing 2,533 0.0 0 0
row cache enqueue latch 215,027 0.0 0.0 0 0
row cache objects 218,418 0.0 0.0 0 472 0.0
sequence cache 99 0.0 0 0
session allocation 8,683 0.0 0 0
session idle bit 94,091 0.0 0 0
Latch Activity for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
->"Get Requests", "Pct Get Miss" and "Avg Slps/Miss" are statistics for
willing-to-wait latch get requests
->"NoWait Requests", "Pct NoWait Miss" are for no-wait latch get requests
->"Pct Misses" for both should be very close to 0.0
Pct Avg Wait Pct
Get Get Slps Time NoWait NoWait
Latch Requests Miss /Miss (s) Requests Miss
session switching 3 0.0 0 0
session timer 80 0.0 0 0
shared pool 160,825 0.0 0.0 0 0
sim partition latch 0 0 35 0.0
simulator hash latch 63,337 0.0 0 0
simulator lru latch 4,437 0.0 0 16,447 0.0
sort extent pool 129 0.0 0 0
transaction allocation 47 0.0 0 0
transaction branch alloc 3 0.0 0 0
undo global data 3,091 0.0 0 0
user lock 114 0.0 0 0
virtual circuit buffers 540,157 0.4 0.0 0 0
virtual circuit queues 256,196 0.0 0.0 0 0
virtual circuits 89,002 0.0 0 0
Top 5 Logical Reads per Segment for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Segment Logical Reads Threshold: 10000
Subobject Obj. Logical
Owner Tablespace Object Name Name Type Reads %Total
DIAGNOTECH DIAGNOTECH REQUISITIONS TABLE 162,064 11.66
SYS SYSTEM I_OBJ1 INDEX 115,328 8.30
SYS SYSTEM OBJ$ TABLE 113,328 8.15
SYS SYSTEM I_IND1 INDEX 109,584 7.88
IP IP BILLPHARMACY TABLE 89,328 6.43
Top 5 Physical Reads per Segment for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Segment Physical Reads Threshold: 1000
Subobject Obj. Physical
Owner Tablespace Object Name Name Type Reads %Total
IP IP BILLPHARMACY TABLE 86,212 34.43
DIAGNOTECH DIAGNOTECH REQUISITIONS TABLE 79,487 31.74
DIAGNOTECH DIAGNOTECH TRACK TABLE 33,193 13.25
IP SYSTEM TRACK TABLE 17,926 7.16
OTS1 OTS1 MONEYRECIEPT TABLE 10,036 4.01
Top 5 Row Lock Waits per Segment for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
-> End Segment Row Lock Waits Threshold: 100
Row
Subobject Obj. Lock
Owner Tablespace Object Name Name Type Waits %Total
IP IP BILLID4064 INDEX 1 100.00
Dictionary Cache Stats for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
->"Pct Misses" should be very low (< 2% in most cases)
->"Cache Usage" is the number of cache entries being used
->"Pct SGA" is the ratio of usage to allocated size for that cache
Get Pct Scan Pct Mod Final
Cache Requests Miss Reqs Miss Reqs Usage
dc_histogram_defs 22,135 1.1 0 0 3,348
dc_object_ids 26,251 0.0 0 0 625
dc_objects 4,895 0.1 0 15 960
dc_profiles 21 0.0 0 0 1
dc_rollback_segments 273 0.0 0 0 12
dc_segments 11,239 0.1 0 0 604
dc_sequences 3 33.3 0 3 6
dc_tablespaces 19,449 0.0 0 0 5
dc_user_grants 2,814 0.0 0 0 17
dc_usernames 886 0.0 0 0 15
dc_users 22,542 0.0 0 0 20
Library Cache Activity for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
->"Pct Misses" should be very low
Get Pct Pin Pct Invali-
Namespace Requests Miss Requests Miss Reloads dations
BODY 445 0.0 445 0.0 0 0
CLUSTER 397 0.0 121 0.0 0 0
SQL AREA 7,041 28.0 24,030 16.9 55 23
TABLE/PROCEDURE 8,324 0.0 15,082 0.6 18 0
TRIGGER 953 0.0 953 0.0 0 0
Shared Pool Advisory for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft End Snap: 3
-> Note there is often a 1:Many correlation between a single logical object
in the Library Cache, and the physical number of memory objects associated
with it. Therefore comparing the number of Lib Cache objects (e.g. in
v$librarycache), with the number of Lib Cache Memory Objects is invalid
Estd
Shared Pool SP Estd Estd Estd Lib LC Time
Size for Size Lib Cache Lib Cache Cache Time Saved Estd Lib Cache
Estim (M) Factr Size (M) Mem Obj Saved (s) Factr Mem Obj Hits
104 .5 97 21,986 47,321 1.0 22,910,514
128 .6 120 27,657 47,381 1.0 22,988,994
152 .8 143 32,965 47,422 1.0 23,048,924
176 .9 166 38,101 47,451 1.0 23,094,145
200 1.0 189 42,541 47,474 1.0 23,126,910
224 1.1 212 47,258 47,492 1.0 23,155,651
248 1.2 235 52,101 47,508 1.0 23,180,673
272 1.4 258 56,800 47,521 1.0 23,202,200
296 1.5 283 61,512 47,532 1.0 23,220,564
320 1.6 306 65,892 47,540 1.0 23,235,720
344 1.7 329 70,532 47,547 1.0 23,246,826
368 1.8 352 75,208 47,553 1.0 23,257,346
392 2.0 375 81,494 47,559 1.0 23,268,801
416 2.1 411 88,685 47,565 1.0 23,279,344
SGA Memory Summary for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
SGA regions Size in Bytes
Database Buffers 369,098,752
Fixed Size 455,784
Redo Buffers 1,191,936
Variable Size 436,207,616
sum 806,954,088
SGA breakdown difference for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
Pool Name Begin value End value % Diff
java free memory 83,886,080 83,886,080 0.00
large free memory 63,891,136 64,350,992 0.72
large session heap 19,994,944 19,535,088 -2.30
shared 1M buffer 2,098,176 2,098,176 0.00
shared Checkpoint queue 1,129,216 1,129,216 0.00
shared DML lock 1,028,764 1,028,764 0.00
shared FileOpenBlock 6,564,072 6,564,072 0.00
shared KGK heap 3,756 3,756 0.00
shared KGLS heap 2,584,540 2,431,584 -5.92
shared KQR M PO 2,844,672 2,768,896 -2.66
shared KQR S PO 249,880 250,652 0.31
shared KQR S SO 7,936 7,936 0.00
shared KSXR pending messages que 841,036 841,036 0.00
shared KSXR receive buffers 1,033,000 1,033,000 0.00
shared MTTR advisory 59,288 59,288 0.00
shared PL/SQL DIANA 3,179,412 3,015,708 -5.15
shared PL/SQL MPCODE 388,924 241,096 -38.01
shared PLS non-lib hp 3,688 3,688 0.00
shared VIRTUAL CIRCUITS 2,564,620 2,564,620 0.00
shared db_handles 1,080,000 1,080,000 0.00
shared dictionary cache 2,137,216 2,137,216 0.00
shared enqueue 1,676,824 1,676,824 0.00
shared event statistics per sess 18,675,020 18,675,020 0.00
shared fixed allocation callback 388 388 0.00
shared free memory 14,167,016 15,470,156 9.20
shared joxs heap init 4,220 4,220 0.00
shared ktlbk state objects 778,960 778,960 0.00
shared library cache 43,962,768 43,051,344 -2.07
shared message pool freequeue 665,792 665,792 0.00
shared miscellaneous 41,742,904 42,080,748 0.81
shared parameters 3,224 9,272 187.59
shared processes 1,500,000 1,500,000 0.00
shared sessions 3,998,480 3,998,480 0.00
shared sim memory hea 195,212 195,212 0.00
shared sql area 111,345,832 111,177,960 -0.15
shared table definiti 16,576 15,240 -8.06
shared transaction 1,852,092 1,852,092 0.00
shared trigger defini 26,236 24,148 -7.96
shared trigger inform 592 592 0.00
shared trigger source 304 304 0.00
buffer_cache 369,098,752 369,098,752 0.00
fixed_sga 455,784 455,784 0.00
log_buffer 1,180,672 1,180,672 0.00
init.ora Parameters for DB: NEOSOFT Instance: neosoft Snaps: 1 -3
End value
Parameter Name Begin value (if different)
background_dump_dest F:\oracle\admin\neosoft\bdump
compatible 9.2.0.0.0
control_files F:\oracle\oradata\neosoft\control
core_dump_dest F:\oracle\admin\neosoft\cdump
db_block_size 8192
db_cache_size 369098752
db_domain
db_file_multiblock_read_count 16
db_name neosoft
dispatchers (PROTOCOL=TCP)
fast_start_mttr_target 300
hash_join_enabled TRUE
instance_name neosoft
java_pool_size 83886080
large_pool_size 83886080
open_cursors 300
pga_aggregate_target 25165824
processes 1500
query_rewrite_enabled FALSE
remote_login_passwordfile EXCLUSIVE
shared_pool_size 209715200
sort_area_size 524288
star_transformation_enabled FALSE
timed_statistics TRUE
undo_management AUTO
undo_retention 10800
undo_tablespace UNDOTBS1
user_dump_dest F:\oracle\admin\neosoft\udump
End of ReportHow did you calculated all these ratios............I looked through the formatted output of the Statspack report, specifically the setion "SQL ordered by reads for DB" and found these SQL statements which are performing a large number of physical reads. Most of the SQL statements have similar WHERE clauses, except for the constants to the right of the = :
Physical Reads Executions Reads per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
8,084 4 2,021.0 3.1 0.14 1.08 4198744706
Module: Out Patient 2.1.41.exe
Select Max(BillNo) as Bno From PatientsRegistration Where regdt
= to_date('01/04/2008','dd/mm/yyyy') and regdt <= to_date('31/03/2009','dd/mm/yyyy')
7,302 1 7,302.0 2.8 0.13 0.51 2116660478
Module: In Patient 2.1.157.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PAT09212'
7,302 1 7,302.0 2.8 0.06 0.41 3612969128
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PAT09037'
7,302 1 7,302.0 2.8 0.19 0.51 3981413559
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
sELECT * FROM BillPharmacy WHERE BillPharmacy.pATIENtid= 'PAT09037' order by to_number((issueno))
7,300 1 7,300.0 2.8 0.14 0.69 136284863
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
delete from billpharmacy where patientid='PAT09037'
7,299 1 7,299.0 2.8 0.20 0.77 2137420337
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
delete from billpharmacy where patientid='PAT09154'
7,298 1 7,298.0 2.8 0.13 0.43 1007690124
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PAT08301'
7,298 1 7,298.0 2.8 0.13 0.58 3087447381
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PAT09154'
7,061 1 7,061.0 2.7 0.13 0.97 2993688253
Module: In Patient 2.1.152.exe
select discount,discamount from billpharmacy where patientid='PAT09146'
and on what basis you one should have to find out
which query causing the problem....
i also wanted to learn how to read the
statspack.........I personally do not like Statspack reports, but there are several very good sources for understanding Statspack reports:
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/analysing-statspack-pt1/
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/statspack-examples/
Metalink Note:232443.1 (How to Identify Resource Intensive SQL for Tuning)
Metalink Note:390374.1 (Oracle Performance Diagnostic Guide (OPDG))
Metalink Note:228913.1 (Systemwide Tuning using STATSPACK Reports)
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc. -
CPU Related Report From Statspack
Hello, I am looking for a statspack query that will produce a report regarding CPU (usage, parses etc.). It has to calculate the average of each day, in order to use the values in excel and build a trend analysis report.
An example a similar report I need but for the I/O is: http://www.dba-oracle.com/unix_linux/io_activity.htm
Any help will be much appreciated.
Thank you.You can try to use the ones written by Tim Gorman and if there isn't anything for your purpose I think you can also use the same logic he used (LAG function) for most of the queries
http://www.evdbt.com/tools.htm
section
SQL*Plus scripts related to STATSPACK:
Coskan Gundogar
Blog: http://coskan.wordpress.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/coskan
Linkedin: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/coskan
--------- -
How to analyze statspack report
Is there any book I can read to understand how to deal with the sp report ?
I know how to read part of it ,
what I need is something that guide what I can do when I see that wait event X is too high.
for exmaple , if dc_constraints is too high , what do I have to change ?
not only that , I have to analyze the rest of the report , I see how can we improve performance .
Thanks .Hi,
how to analyze the reportWell, I have my notes here:
http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_reading_statspack_report.htm
Also, you can paste-in a STATSPACK report into http://www.statspackanalyzer.com and learn how to analyse a STATSPACK report.
There are several Oracle Press books on STATSPACK, you may find useful:
http://www.amazon.com/Oracle9i-High-Performance-Tuning-STATSPACK-Burleson/dp/007222360X
Hope this helps. . .
Donald K. Burleson
Oracle Press author
Author of "Oracle Tuning: The Definitive Reference":
http://www.dba-oracle.com/bp/s_oracle_tuning_book.htm -
HOW TO REVIEW STATSPACK REPORT
dear all
i have sucessfully done with statspack
i know how to analyse with
1.Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
2.Top 5 Timed Events
3. Buffer Gets Executions Gets per Exec %Total Time
4.tablespace
but i want to explore more on statspack pls let me know how to analyse more on report
please let me know where i can find it
regardsSagar,
Jonathan Lewis has discussed about what to read in statspack report and what not as serious of articles on his blog.
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/tag/oracle/statspack/
For me, I felt, they are worth to read and understand.
Jaffar -
I want to learn how can i read the statspack report and find out where is problem. Is any one have the helpfull doc about the reading statspack report please send me.
ThanksSear at google, fro statspack, you will find bulk of good links for the same.
Also, search at http://asktom.oracle.com.
If you have metalink access, it has couple of good notes on how to evaluate statspack.report.
There are couple of sites where you can upload your statspack report and it can give you the analysis. (www.oraperf.com is one of the site).
Jaffar -
How to do Detailed AWR Report Analysis
Hi,
Please let me Know how to do analysis AWR report and get it corrected.The best way to isolate the bottlenecks in Oracle is to analyze the top five wait events for the database and look for any external waits that might be associated with disk, CPU and network.
Oracle provide two scripts to produce workload repository reports (awrrpt.sql and awrrpti.sql). They are similar in format to the statspack reports and give the option of HTML or plain text formats. The two reports give essential the same output but the awrrpti.sql allows you to select a single instance. The reports can be generated as follows.
@$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/awrrpt.sql
@$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/awrrpti.sql
The scripts prompt you to enter the report format (html or text), the start snapshot id, the end snapshot id and the report filename. The resulting report can be opend in a browser or text editor accordingly.
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/10g/automatic-workload-repository-10g.php -
Hello Everyone:
Common sense tells me that (within reason) statspack snapshots should be run fairly frequently. I have a set of users who is challenging that notion, saying that Statspack is spiking the system and slowing them down, and so they want me to only take snapshots every 12 hours.
I remember seeing a document (I thought it was on MetaLink, but I dunno...) that spoke of best practices for Statspack snapshots. My customers want to limit me to one snapshot every 12 hours, and I contend that I might as well not run it with that window.
Can someone point me to some best practice or other documentation that will support my contentions that:
1) Statspack is NOT a resource hog, and
2) twice-a-day is not going to provide meaningful data.
Thanks,
Mike
P.S. If I'm all wet, and you know it, I'd like to see that documentation, too!Hi Mike,
saying that Statspack is spiking the system and slowing them downI wrote both of the Oracle Press STATSPACK books and I've NEVER seen STATSPACK cause a burden. Remember a "snapshot" is a simple dump of the X$ memory structures into tables, very fast . . .
they want me to only take snapshots every 12 hours.Why bother? STATSPACK and AWR reports are elapsed-time reports, and long-term reports are seldom useful . . . .
An important thing to remember is that even if statistics are gathered too frequently with STATSPACK, reporting can always be done on a larger time window. For example, if snapshots are at five-minute intervals and there is a report that takes 30 minutes to run, that report may or may not be slow during any given five-minute period.
After looking at the five-minute windows, the DBA can decide to look at a 30-minute window and then run a report that spans six individual five-minute windows. The moral of the story is to err on the side of sampling too often rather than not often enough.
I have over 600 pages dedicated to STATSPACK and AWR analysis at the link below, if you want a super-detailed explaination:
http://www.rampant-books.com/book_2005_1_awr_proactive_tuning.htm
I'm not as authoritative as the documentation, but even hourly snapshot durations can cause loss of performance details.
Ah, this Oracle Best Practices document may help:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/manageability/database/pdf/ow05/PS_S998_273998_106-1_FIN_v1.pdf
By default, every hour a snapshot of all workload andstatistics information is taken and stored in the AWR. The data is retained for 7 days by default and both snapshot interval and retention settings are userconfigurable."
Hope this helps. . .
Donald K. Burleson
Oracle Press author -
dear all
i want a detail study of my statspack report
i am referring to these link right now but i need a detail study of my report with each and every section covering all
Statspack report analysis
http://www.evdbt.com/TGorman_SYM06_SP_DW.doc
CHeersIt wont be possible that someone would read and analyze your whole report here, a specific issue may be taken and analyzed.
Besides the link which Yingkuan mentioned, you may take the help of this too,
http://www.akadia.com/services/ora_statspack_survival_guide.html
HTH
Aman....
Edited by: Aman.... on Sep 24, 2008 11:11 AM
Sac: Sorry for duplicate link. I didnt see your post.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do you create a disk image using Disk Copy?
Hello, Is there any way you can create a disk image using Disc Copy? Is there a better way to create a Disk Image? I would like to burn two copies of a 4.2 gig folder on my mac. I usually insert a blank DVD-R and then the mac asks if I would like to
-
hi, I have to do perofrmance for one program, it is taking 67000 secs in back ground for execution and 1000 secs for some varints .It is an ALV report. please suggest me how to proced to change the code.
-
would like to download Firefox but new version is not supported by my operating system
-
Dear Gurus, We are on SRM 7 and configuring the Plan driven procurement scenario. As required, we have activated the BAdi 'ME_REQ_SOURCING_CUST' for transferring the purchase requisitions from ERP to SAP SRM. In the method ' IF_EX_ME_REQ_SOURCE_CUST~
-
Window Restore on Dual Monitors after Waking
I asked this question in the OSX forum a week or two ago and didn't receive a response. I'm thinking most of the dual monitor uses must have Mac Minis so maybe this is a better place to ask. When my monitors awake from sleeping, it's a crap shoot as