STO returns with EWM Error "Posting with reference to pur. order only possi

Hi Experts,
We are trying to STO returns GR (161 Movement) with transaction MIGO for a EWM managed plant.
Plant A is a EWM managed plant and Plant B is IM managed plant.
We created a stock transfer order with "B" as supplying plant for plant "A" but with "Returns" tick in the item. (Document type UB)
In the first step, when we try to post 161 movement with MIGO transaction, we are getting the below error
"Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse"
Message no. L9510
But the same scenario works between two IM managed plants.
Can you please help me in resolving the issue
Gobinathan G

Hi All,
I am interested in the tail end of this process. I have activated DWM. We have received an Idoc confirming the Inbound Delivery for a Purchase Order Receipt.
The Goods Movement Status of the Inbound delivery has changed to C but there is only a Confirmation of Service in the document flow and the Purchase Order is not receipted.
I am unable to MIGO the PO manually.
I guess the Inbound delivery should have posted a receipt on the PO but not sure what is missing?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Lee

Similar Messages

"Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse"

When I try posting GR with mvmt type 101 wrt PO I am receiving the error “Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse”
The scenario is storage lcation is maintained with the external warehouse management .
Is there anything i need to maintain warehouse as decentralised one or should i need to maintain any moment types or is there anything else i should maintain in the customisation.
Kindly guide me regarding this as I am new to WM ,Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
In my case i have not maintained as decentralised one.
also the thing is there is no warehouse house data managed over here .the requirement is when connected to extended warehouse the system has to create inspection lot after the GR has done ,
whereas in normal scenario everything is normal,
can you please suggest what should be done in this case.
Also if possible can you please tell me what from the scratch so that it will be helpful to come through .

Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse Message no. L9510

Hi,
I´m trying to setup a reversal for movement type 102 trough our Decentralized warehouse but without any luck.
I have check some of the entries in customizing from the path down below, and also check some of links here on the community but still not getting anywhere
Logistics Execution→Decentralized WMS Integration→Central Processing→Application→Define Interface to Inventory Management and Delivery-Relevant Data.
Assign WM movement type references to IM movement types
Delivery-Relevant Parameters for Reference Movement Type
I could see from my our own reversal without WMS this setup is by delivery type DOG to pick the part wiht movement type:102 reference to WM.
However I still getting the error for WMS every time I try from MIGO with reference to Phurchase order, Indbound delivery, or material document.
Could anyone share me with some knowledge on that area.
Looking forward to hear from you.
Added file "picture"
Regards
Claus

I sent you a solution in you topic Albert.
Claus, again, no luck, sorry, you should always get informed about the functionalities of decentralized WM before implementing it, if you want to do a return to your vendor here's the process.
Decentralized isn't the same thing as standard WM, there are a LOT of limitations.
Here's the process by which you can achieve the required:
(return delivery to vendor)
*ERP* Set return delivery type => e.g. RL for doc.type/plant combination here:
IMG => MM => Purchasing => Purchase Order => Returns Order
*ERP* XK02 - In account control data, maintain customer in vendor master record for your vendor you are returning the goods to
*ERP* XK02 - check "Return Vendor" checkbox (purchase view - control data) field is: LFM1-KZRET
*ERP* Finally you can create the delivery using VL10B based on your PO number
*WMS* In decentralized WMS, you will get a replica of the OB delivery, process it as usual and you are done.
Hope it helps,
Mihailo.

Asset Retirement (ABAON) error - Posting with trans.type 210 not possible

HI All,
I was trying to sell an asset using transaction ABAON which is fully depreciated, but I am getting the error -
" Posting with trans.type 210 not possible (No acquisition posted)"
The Scenario is, there is an asset(car) which was uploaded during implimentation and it got depreciated fully in the month of april.
The same asset(car, which is fully depreciated) is sold for an amount of Rs 40000/-.
So, I was trying to post it with some revenue vlaue in transaction ABAON, but I am getting the above error.
(The Asset value was an uploaded during implimentation,it was not an acquisition value from SAP. It was an uploaded value from legacy data)
Could any one help in this, or let me know the correct process for this kind of transactions.
Awaiting for a reply.
Regards,
Upendra

HI Mamta,
Thanks for the reply.
While Uploading the data was uploaded as asset balance upload for prior year with value.
Plase let me know what do you propose, to be done for this.
Regards,

Error posting with trans.type 159 not possible (no aquisition posted)

Hello All,
A user has created an PO for asset with GR non valuated in 2007 and has performed a MIGO/GR in the same year 2007. Now in 2008 the user has received an invoice against the said asset and wants to post it thru Trans MIRO.
At the time of posting the invoice the user gets the error "posting with trans.type 159 not possible (no aquisition posted)" . Since this is a completely new asset and GR non valuated asset process is a standard in SAP why is the system recognising the transation type as 159 i/o trans type 100 ie new asset aquisition.
If i post a dummy value to the same asset using FB01 the system accepts the value but the same process if i intend to follow usin MIRO system does not allow.
Can you guys help me
Thanks
Nelson

Thanks Paul for your reply, I checked the depreciation key. inthe key the "Aqu only allowed in capitalization year is marked as NO"
Therefore the problem is not the depreciation key
Thanks
Nelson

How do I delete sites created with iWeb and posted with .mac after a format

I am confused about how to delete a couple of sites that I created with iWeb and posted with my .mac after I did a format reload?
I have tried everything. The original files are not on my MacBook Pro because of the format.
I also see them in my idisc, but I is my understanding that on my MacBook Pro that I can delete the files, but they are hosted online. On the online idisk I cannot delete them because there is no option. Please help!!!

Using the file menu in Finder:
Go/iDisk/My iDisk/Web/Sites/iWeb/YourSitesAreHere
Highlight selected files and Command/Delete. You will receive a drop down asking you if you are sure; click OK and the files/sites will be deleted immediately from the iDisk.
Mark

Error : Posting with trans.type 200 not possible (No acquisition posted)

Dear All,
Iam getting error while doing asset retirement thru ABAVN. Error is mentioned below. Pls do the needful.
Posting with trans.type 200 not possible (No acquisition posted)
Message no. AA324

Dear Bird,
Already asset has been posted , but then also it shows the same error.
pls help on this.
regards
Ranjit..

MIRO error Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)

Hi,
I have the following probem while doing MIRO. Would appreciate if someone could help.
Error in Purchase invoice posting MIRO :-
The user has created a PO for asset in FY2010 and has performed a MIGO in FY2010.
Now in FY2011 the user tries to invoice against the above asset and wants to post it thru Trans MIRO.
System gives an error during MIRO "Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)" Message no AA 324
Trans type 159 has trans type group 12 attached to it.
MIGO can not be reversed because it belongs to the closed FY.
Please help

Hi
refer notes 1526247 and 1507808... Though it relates to Japan, but the issue is same
Br, Ajay M

Failed to add app with security error related with c2wts

Right now, we are facing some weird issue when adding our app to customer's SharePoint site. When site collection admin clicks our app to add it, he would get a popup page with title "Access Required" and message "Sorry, you
don't have access to this page", however he is already site collection admin.
At the SharePoint logs, we saw the following exceptions:
SPSecurityContext: Could not retrieve a valid windows identity for username 'company\user' with UPN '[email protected]'. UPN is required when Kerberos constrained delegation is used. Exception: System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[System.ServiceModel.ExceptionDetail]: WTS0003: The caller is not authorized to access the service. (Fault Detail is equal to An ExceptionDetail, likely created by IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults=true, whose value is: System.UnauthorizedAccessException: WTS0003: The caller is not authorized to access the service.
at Microsoft.IdentityModel.WindowsTokenService.CallerSecurity.CheckCaller(WindowsIdentity callerIdentity)
at Microsoft.IdentityModel.WindowsTokenService.S4UServiceContract.PerformLogon(Func`1 logonOperation, Int32 pid)
at SyncInvokeUpnLogon(Object , Object[] , Object[] )
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.SyncMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object instance, Object[] inputs, Object[]& outputs)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DispatchOperationRuntime.InvokeBegin(MessageRpc& rpc)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage5(MessageRpc& rpc)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage31(MessageRpc& rpc)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.MessageRpc.Process(Boolean isOperationContextSet))..
(note, I changed the user name to some generic name there)
after that, we also saw another exception:
No windows identity for company\user
Access Denied. Exception: Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation., StackTrace:
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SPUtility.HandleAccessDenied(Exception ex)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPAppPrincipalPermissionsManager.UpdateAppOnlyPolicy(SPAppPrincipalInfo appPrincipal, Boolean allowAppOnlyPolicy)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.AppAuthorizePageBase.GrantAppAccess()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.AppInvPage.BtnAllow_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument)
at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)
at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)
at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest()
at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
at System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)
at System.Web.HttpApplication.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error)
at System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb)
at System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest wr, HttpContext context)
at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)
at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)
at System.Web.Hosting.UnsafeIISMethods.MgdIndicateCompletion(IntPtr pHandler, RequestNotificationStatus& notificationStatus)
at System.Web.Hosting.UnsafeIISMethods.MgdIndicateCompletion(IntPtr pHandler, RequestNotificationStatus& notificationStatus)
at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)
at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) .
I did some reading over the SharePoint code and also searched over internet, I found out this link:
Adding App Causes Security Error where the similar error is thrown as well and he fixed the issue by reconfiguring the c2wts services. His issue is slightly different from mine. In his case, end users won't be able to add in the first time
and they would get "You Can't Add This App Here" message while in our case the error is thrown during adding the app.
Why we would need the c2wts services here for adding an app if user is already logged in SharePoint via windows authentication? Could someone confirm that would be the root cause for this failure since I also see the stack related " at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPAppPrincipalPermissionsManager.UpdateAppOnlyPolicy(SPAppPrincipalInfo
appPrincipal, Boolean allowAppOnlyPolicy)", just wonder if AppOnlyPolicy=true which our app requires has anything to do with this as well. Again, I could not find anything related article about that specific configuration is required to allow app with
AppOnlyPolicy.
Another weird thing is that it only happens at sites with managed path. At root site, the app could be added without any problem.
Any suggestions are highly welcome and really appreciated. This is on a big customer. :-) Thanks in advance for your insights.

This issue can occur when you change the name of the "Application Name" within Visual Studio, then deploy to BizTalk with the new name. Problems is the DLLs are still assocaited with that earlier deployment name in BizTalk. So go into BizTalk
Admin Console, then navigate to: BizTalk Group - Applications - Then for each application check the "Resources" folder. Under one of these folders you should see your DLLs are already assigned to one of these other BTS apps. So you need to
delete the resources from the app (or delete the other apps) then your new deployment name will work.

Error Posting with Tax Code

Hi Experts,
I have configured Travel Management for Canada with Tax Codes for Expense Type. Now, when i am trying to post to accounting using Tcode PRRW i am getting this error:
E RW609 Error in document: TRAVL 0000000011 ECDCLNT100
E RW619 Combination of transaction key NVP and tax code is wrong
Have we missed anything, please provide your inputs.
Regards,
KOutilya A.K

Hi,
Just Check these notes whether is it useful.
Note -- 1109348, 979102, 884311.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
S.Srikanth

SOAP adapter engine with system error, problem with fault message.

HI,
I have IDOC -> PI -> SOAP scenario.
Idoc to PI is async. I have no problem in receiving the idoc in PI. The message mapping is carried out and sent to the adapter engine. I can also see the technical routing payload. It is sucessful at XML monitoring in SXMB_MONI.
The error is at PI -> SOAP.
I have wsdl provided by the receiver webservice. Which I have imported.
And created a service interface against this wsdl. I tried changing it to both sync and async.
I have also provided fault message.
I have set a receiver soap communication channel and provided the target URL like "http://xxx/services" and soap
action = processDocument. Also provided user id and password.
I have a
Sender Agreement
Receiver determination
Interface determination
Receiver Agreement
I check in RWB adapter engine, this message goes to system error. The error log is as shown at the bottom.
When I see the message content, the SOap document shows me the details about IDOC, Instead I feel it should match
with the wsdl, where they have specified the corresponding interface name and address location etc.Please correct me.
How does the receiver know which service interface is it? The Service Interface which I created in the ER is
different from the WSDL, Does this have to be same? I see that the soap document in the adapter engine has the
Service interface name which I created in the ER. Where in the document the Reciever interface name is sent?
Where can I see the generated soap document for the receiver?
Is there some setting/configuration required in PI for this to work?
I tried using the tcpgw to see the error. If I dont provide the service interface name in the communication channel
then I get the following error in the TCPGW. "The service cannot be found for the endpoint reference"
When I provide the service interface name in the communication channel I get a valid fault message.
Similarly
When I use SOAPUI, I can see the fault exception being return. The adapter engine doesnot show an equivalent message
instead it goes into system error as shown at the bottom. I guess this is expected, if so what is the work around? (I found this weblog /people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2011/01/10/soap-fault-in-sap-pi-hijack-it, do I need to implement this? Or use ALEAUD?
The fault message what I see in SOAPUI has the below format.
<soapenv:Fault xmlns:axis2ns1="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
         <faultcode>axis2ns1:Server</faultcode>
         <faultstring>nested exception is: psdi.util.MXApplicationException: BMXAA7136E - Validation failed when the
                            database default values were set. See the associated message for more information.
           BMXAA4190E - Country NZ is not in the value list.</faultstring>
         <detail>
            <Exception>org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: nested exception is: psdi.util.MXApplicationException: BMXAA7136E
                      - Validation failed when the database default values were set. See the associated message for more information.
     BMXAA4190E - Country NZ is not in the value list.
            /Exception>
         </detail>
</soapenv:Fault>
And the fault message in my ER service interface is stanadard datatype ExchangeFaultData, which is different from
the above. Is this the problem? Can I change the data type here to be the same as above?
Audit log in the RWB adapter engine.
Time Stamp Type Description
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Information MP: processing local module Localejbs/sap.com/com.sap.aii.af.soapadapter/XISOAPAdapterBean
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Information SOAP: request message entering the adapter with user J2EE_GUEST
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Information SOAP: completed the processing
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Information SOAP: sending a delivery error ack ...
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Information SOAP: sent a delivery error ack
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Error MP: exception caught with cause
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Error Adapter Framework caught exception: null
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Error Delivering the message to the application using connection
SOAP_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to:
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException.
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Information The message status was set to WAIT.
30.09.2011 15:10:57 Information The asynchronous message was successfully scheduled to be delivered at Fri Sep 30
15:15:57 NZDT 2011.

I tried changing it to both sync and async.
I have also provided fault message.
dont feel that you need to do above steps.
I have a
Sender Agreement
ideally you dont need a sender agreement (and a channel) for IDOC --> PI flow.
When I see the message content, the SOap document shows me the details about IDOC
this is fine...you may see fields as seen in EDI_DC40 of the IDOC...
How does the receiver know which service interface is it?
receiver need not know about the SI created in PI.
The Service Interface which I created in the ER is
different from the WSDL, Does this have to be same?
you should the WSDL (external definition) as the Request Message in your service interface.
Is there some setting/configuration required in PI for this to work?
nothing specific...AFAIK
I have set a receiver soap communication channel and provided the target URL like "http://xxx/services" and soap action
can you open the URL from Internet explorer...from your machine or from the machine which is in the same network as your PI server?
Things to check:
WSDL structure in PI and in target system is exactly the same.
does the target system require mesage in SOAP format (SOAP envelope - SOAP Header + SOAP body)?
target system is up and running?

Executable build failing with no error message with smtp email VIs

I have a VI which I want to build into a .exe which will be used as an HMI for a real-time system. I am using the SMTP VIs to text/email me various notifications about the system state. The main VI works fine if run but will not build into an .exe. The error message comes back blank so no help there (LabView 2010). If I just simply disable the portion of the code in the HMI.VI which contains the email VI code, the application builds. I searched for anwers and was unable to resolve the problem. Any ideas? Do I need to include anything in the build that is specific to the LabView SMTP VIs? I'm new to building .exe's so I appologize for any rookie mistakes I may have made.
Thanks.

mikeporter wrote:
You said you searched for answers (on the forum?).
Yes.
What did you find?
I found a bunch of topics on email send errors after the application was built but nothing related to .exe building failures (related to the SMTP/email VIs). I also found topics dicussing the bug that fails to report an (any) error during the .exe build (for 2011). The solution was to install the service pack. if that's my problem then I will have to go through the motions to get that done (corporate computers / lack of persmissons and such).
What have you tried? This question has been answered many, many, many times.
I tried what I stated in the OP. If I disable the portion of the code which contains the email SMTP VIs, the application builds, otherwise, the build fails and no error code or description is given.
PS: probably has nothing to do with the SMTP drivers, per se.
If the answer has been given many, many times, then I appologize for not being able to find it before posting. Trust me, the last thing I want to is waste my time fishing for answers on the forum, especially when I get a response from forum members who would rather point out that my mis-identified problem has been answered many, many times, rather then just helping me out.

Down payment with reference to sales order only

We are posting Customer Down payment w.r.t Sales order number with line item number. How come we enter sales order number only without line item number at the time of down payment.
Q2- After the down payment posting F-29 , how its possible to change the line item of sales order number?

Dear ,
about my Q2: I want to change Line item number of sales order after posting customer down payment.
Have you looked Q1 : that sytem did not asked to enter line item number of sales order at the time of posting down payment

Import-spweb with -force errors out with "already exists" message

So, I did an export-spweb of an existing site (migrated from SP2007 and still retains the SP2007 look and feel) and created the files containing it. I then went to a new farm, with a new site collection on a new content database. Nothing else exists
there.
I run
Import-spweb –identity
http://mytestsite/sites/ITSM -Path d:\temp\itsm –verbose –force –nofilecompression
and after a few minutes, we get:
[5/27/2014 1:47:15 PM] [List] [Links] Progress: Importing
[5/27/2014 1:47:15 PM] [List] [Links]   ExtendedVerbose: Creating
[5/27/2014 1:47:15 PM] [List] [Links]   Error: A list, survey, discussion board, or document library with the specified title already exists in this Web site. Please choose another title.
[5/27/2014 1:47:15 PM] [List] [Links]   Debug:    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx)
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CreateListOnImport(String bstrUrl, Guid& pguidListId, String bstrTitle, String bstrDescription, Int32 lTemplateID, String bstrFeatureId, Guid guidRootFolderId, Int64 llFlags, Int32 iVersion, Int32 iAuthor,
String bstrFields, String bstrContentTypes, String bstrImageUrl, String bstrEventSinkAssembly, String bstrEventSinkClass, String bstrEventSinkData, Guid guidDocTemplateId, String bstrViews, String bstrForms, Boolean bCompressedSchema, DateTime dtTimeCreated)
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Deployment.ListSerializer.CreateList(SPWeb parentWeb, Dictionary`2 listMetaData, Boolean usingPublicSchema)
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Deployment.ListSerializer.SetObjectData(Object obj, SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context, ISurrogateSelector selector)
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Deployment.XmlFormatter.CallSetObjectData(Object obj, SerializationInfo objectData, ISerializationSurrogate surrogate, ISurrogateSelector selector)
I don't understand why, with the -force, it just didn't overwrite whatever it thinks was there. That's how I interpret the meaning for the flag.
It suggests that I chose another title - I am trying to create an exact duplicate of the original site, so giving a different title defeats my objective.
Is there something that I am missing?
We ended up without any site at all to go to... at the very least it could have created all that it could from the file.
Thank you!

Weird - how would a site have two lists with the same name and path?
How would I get around this? I mean, the export had no problem creating the data... I expected the import to rebuild the same thing that was exported.
I take a look at the lists and libraries on the original site and there is 1 list that appears with the name "Links". There are other lists that have the word Links as part of their name - but
not a second one with the simple name of "Links".

Ipad2 restore fails with unknown error(1) with "iTunes and recovery" mode logo

Ipad2 64GB was sluggish and we tried to update with latest iOS update, security 2014-005 and latest iTunes on iMac 12.01 It enters a recoverymode with the iTunes logo and connector symbol displayed on the screen. Recognized that iPad is connected and proceeded to restore to factory condition. Goes through several stages, FW verification, restore etc but fails to proceed past a certain point and puts up an unknown error (1) occurred message. Disabled firewall and tried restore and it failed in the same spot. Tried using power + home button combos to enter DFW or restore mode. None of them worked. Took it to the Apple store and was told that it can't be debugged further because it did not yet boot up ( if it has the iTunes and connector symbol it must be in some state that it can be interacted with?) It's physically in a perfectly beautiful condition, nothing funky (jail breaking etc ) done to it, well taken care of. The tech said that he can offer a replacement for 299$ after he tried to restore it twice without success. I am surprised that this tech thinks that it cannot be probed with some low level FW tools through the serial connector to determine the system state. Any suggestions?

Hey Ngtrishank,
Thanks for the question. Based on the information you have provided, I concur with the Apple Store’s conclusion. Error 1 is usually related to a hardware issue with the device. While there are a few steps you can attempt in the following resource, in most cases Error 1 signifies that the device needs to be serviced. For more information on troubleshooting Error 1, see this article:
Resolve iOS update and restore errors - Apple Support
http://support.apple.com/en-us/ts3694
Check for hardware issues
Related errors: 1, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 20, 21, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 1000, 1002, 1004, 1011, 1012, 1014, 1667, or 1669.
These errors mean that your device or computer may have a hardware issue that's preventing the update or restore from completing.
If you’d like to learn more about your Service options for this device, check out the following link:
iPad Other Repair Options - Apple Support
http://www.apple.com/support/ipad/repair/other/
Thanks,
Matt M.

STO returns with EWM Error "Posting with reference to pur. order only possi

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for