Stock Removal Strategy-A
Hi,
I am using Stock removal strategy as A-Partial Quantities for one of the S.Types. I have the stocks like this.
Bin A- 10
Bin B- 20
Bin C- 30
When picking for a TO of 100, it is picking from Bin B and Bin C. My question is according to Stock Removal Strategy A, I thought it is supposed to pick 10 from Bin A, 20 from Bin B and 70 from Bin C. Isn't it?
Are there any other settings that I need to maintain in order to make sure it picks the partial quantities to make sure we are freeing up the bins with less quantities?
Thanks for all the replies...
Venkat
I think that you will need to accomplish this by using user exit EXIT_SAPLL03A_005 for picking - it's this include: ZXLTOU07. This should be fairly easy considering your requirement.
You will sort your bin candidates by available qty (field verme) in them (ascending), and then pick from the first bin. The system will loop through this user exit until entire quantity is picked.
The table you need to influence in this exit is t_qmat.
But.. I don't think your requirement will be the best solution (except if you pick less than full pallet in 99% of the time). This is because you will never get to pick full pallet quantity from full pallets.
E.g. You always want to pick from partial pallets => You will pick until you pick all the partial qty in warehouse for the material. But, it is sure that you will not have the exact qty in partial pallets, so most probably and I'd say most certainly you will have to pick the rest of the qty from full pallet.
It practically means that you will always have partial pallets, and if not you will create them by your picking strategy.
But if this is what you want it can be easily accomplished by user exit mentioned above...
Similar Messages
-
User Defined Stock Removal Strategy
Hi,
We want to define a user defined stock removal strategy while creating TO for delivery using transaction LT03. This can be done in user exit MWMTO004. Although we modify the output table T_QMAT in this exit as per requirement , the TO is not split as per the table.
SAP proposes all the batch bins in table T_QMAT , but if all the delivery quantity is found in first bin itself , the TO is created with that bin only , no Split. We wish to split the TO as per table T_QMAT.
How to split the TO as per proposal from the exit ?
Please provide some ideas.
Regards,
TusharHello,
You can change the Storage unit type in this exit EXIT_SAPLL03A_005 of TO creation transaction.
I am not sure, If this helps you.
Thanks and Regards
Reddy -
WM - Stock Placement and Stock Removal Strategy
Hi Gurus
Need yr expertise..
What would be the ideal stock placement strategy if need to store standard pack in one location and partial quantity in another location?
example:
standard pack for material A is 100pcs
if GR 250 pcs, TO need to be created for 200pcs at location A (since it is standard pack) and
50pcs at location B (sicne it is partial)
The same logic aplly for stock removal strategy. If customer order of 200pcs, system need to pick
from location A (since it is standard pack). If customer order 50pcs, system need to pick from
location B. What will be the ideal stock removal strategy?
Please advise
Rgds..Sanjayyu can make use of the small/large stock removal strategy and for the concerned material in WM 2 view you can give the control quantity like if the requirment is of >200 pc then storage type 0002 should be used to pick the goods otherwise if required quantity is less then system should search for storage type 0001
this is a standard strategy -
Folks,
This is the scenario, We have 2-3 pallets in a single storage bin.The bin is like a deep rack in the warehouse.
So the logic would be to use the Last in first out strategy to pull out the pallet which is outside/first one reachable to the user.
So LIFO basically works on the actual TO creation time so in case a TO for P1 is created on 01/01/01 at 12:00 PM and another TO for P2 on 01/01/01 at 12:01.The proposes the pallet created at 12:01 to be picked when there is stock removal.
But the scenario is like though the TO for P2 is created first at 12:01 and it is confirmed at 12:15 and the next one P1 at 12:16 so the pallet P2 will be placed inside the bin and P1 will be placed outside/reachable to the user.
But when LIFO kicks in for automatic TO creation it will propose p2 as the To was created at a later time but the user will pick P1 as it is the nearest reachable to him so when he tries to confirm the pallet at production the system says that the wrong pallet from what was proposed was picked.
Is there any enhancement we can use to build this custom stock removal strategy.Hi,
Just querious on TO confirmation time...why it is confirmed differently? Will immediate TO confirmation (after TO creation) creates any issue to putaway process into Rack?
If don't want immediate TO confirmation...you can manipulate the picking of pallet through user exit MWMTO004 Own stock removal strategy (EXIT_SAPLL03A_005) to change the sorting of records on TO confirmation date and time instead of TO creation date and time.
Hope this will help.
Reg,
Sudhir -
Stock Removal Strategy - Enhancement MWMTO004
All;
I am making changes in the exit EXIT_SAPLL03A_005 (Enhancement MWMTO004 ) for our own stock removal strategy. When i populate the internal table T_QMAT with the stock and bin details, there is a problem.
I have the following sequence in T_QMAT.
Bin(LGPLA) Total Stock(VERME) Stock to be Removed (AUSME)
A 100 50
B 34 34
When the TO is created, it is taking all 84 from Bin A and Bin B is not all consumed. My Removal Strategy at config is "F".
Any light shown on this discrepancy is greatly appreciated.
Thanks!!!!I think that you will need to accomplish this by using user exit EXIT_SAPLL03A_005 for picking - it's this include: ZXLTOU07. This should be fairly easy considering your requirement.
You will sort your bin candidates by available qty (field verme) in them (ascending), and then pick from the first bin. The system will loop through this user exit until entire quantity is picked.
The table you need to influence in this exit is t_qmat.
But.. I don't think your requirement will be the best solution (except if you pick less than full pallet in 99% of the time). This is because you will never get to pick full pallet quantity from full pallets.
E.g. You always want to pick from partial pallets => You will pick until you pick all the partial qty in warehouse for the material. But, it is sure that you will not have the exact qty in partial pallets, so most probably and I'd say most certainly you will have to pick the rest of the qty from full pallet.
It practically means that you will always have partial pallets, and if not you will create them by your picking strategy.
But if this is what you want it can be easily accomplished by user exit mentioned above... -
User exit for stock removal strategy.
Hi Experts,
I have a scenario that I want to use FIFO stock removal strategy which is based on the old MRP price in the storage type. How
Can I impliment his User exist or any predefined user exit are there for this scenario.
Thanks
Raghu.Please use enhancement MWMT0004 and MWMt0013
-
Changing stock removal strategy
Hi All,
I need to modify the source storage bin during stock removal such that the TO is created from fixed bin even when its stock is zero.I was using exit EXIT_SAPLL03A_009 for the same.But it gave me 'Quant overflow' or 'Storage unit error'.
I also tried EXIT_SAPLL03A_005 but even this doesn't seem to work as I cant find data to append in t_qmat table.
Can anyone help? its urgent.
Edited by: Jaya Singh on Mar 24, 2008 5:31 PMI think that you will need to accomplish this by using user exit EXIT_SAPLL03A_005 for picking - it's this include: ZXLTOU07. This should be fairly easy considering your requirement.
You will sort your bin candidates by available qty (field verme) in them (ascending), and then pick from the first bin. The system will loop through this user exit until entire quantity is picked.
The table you need to influence in this exit is t_qmat.
But.. I don't think your requirement will be the best solution (except if you pick less than full pallet in 99% of the time). This is because you will never get to pick full pallet quantity from full pallets.
E.g. You always want to pick from partial pallets => You will pick until you pick all the partial qty in warehouse for the material. But, it is sure that you will not have the exact qty in partial pallets, so most probably and I'd say most certainly you will have to pick the rest of the qty from full pallet.
It practically means that you will always have partial pallets, and if not you will create them by your picking strategy.
But if this is what you want it can be easily accomplished by user exit mentioned above... -
Hi,
We have requirement for removal Strategy
Example:
Stock Bin1: 300
Bin2: 500
Requirement Qty: 500
System is picking 300 from Bin1 and 200 from Bin2. We don’t want to break the pallet. Is it possible to Pick the full quantity of 500 from Bin2?
Thank YouPlease use a user exit for picking:
1) Activate the user exit for picking on storage type level settings
2) Write code that first searches for candidate bins that have at least the quantity required on TO
You can achieve this easily, not too much coding is needed here. Just looping through candidate bins and selecting the first one with the qty >= of the requested qty.
As for standard, I have tried to achieve this for a client in customizing only, but never actually go it to work.
You can do something with M strategy - Large / Small quantities, but this is more influencing the search between storage types, not storage bins in the same storage type.
So, to cut the story short, go with the user-exit for picking. -
WM - Stock removal strategy: small/large quantities
I have two different storage types: one to remove small quantities of a
product (with negative stocks available) and one for the large ones. In
the material master record I have established for a product that
quantities lower than 50 units are removed from the first storage type.
I also have defined for the product one stock removal rule (to search
for material in the two storage types)
When I don't have enough available stock in my small quantities storage
type, the system always search for stock in the other storage type
(although I asked for 10 units), but what I need really is to have a
negative available stock in this storage, and I will do a reposition.
It's not correct that for small quantities it searchs in the large
quantities storage type.
If in the stock removal rule I'd only put the small quantities storage
type, then I get negative available stock in the storage type, but,
logically, the system then doesn't find from where to remove large
quantities.
Thank youHi Paloma,
I hope defined the strategies for both the storage types (for large and small qty.) what about the the negative stocks, how are you going to do the configuration. Mostly what you can do is, you can allow the negative stocks for that particular storage type, but you can't guide the system to create negative quants if the quantity is small.
Hope it is helpful
Aktar -
Regarding Stock Removal strategy M
Hi friends -
We have a requirement here for the system to propose different storage types based on quantity on the transfer order.
I have recommended strategy M which allows for this.
But there is a problem, there is not 1 fixed bin to pick from in the case of small qties.
In other words, the client wants a group of bins to belong to a material, if the qty on the TO is less than Control quantity then the system should propose any of those bins. Plus replenishment for that material should always point to that group of bins.
Now I suggested using section indicators and maintaining a section search strategy to correctly identify those bins, but they dont want to maintain so much material master data either.
What they want to do is this, identify bins as and allocate them for a material, all picks and all replenishment henceforth should point to those bins until changed. In addition they want minimal master data maintenance.
Any ideas?
Thanks for your recommendations.There doesn't need to be 'one fixed Bin', you just want the system to go to a given Storage Type dependent on the control quantity (WM2). It'll find the material in whichever Bin(s) it's in.
-
WM Stock Removal Strategy User Exit
Hi Experts,
Requirement is to create TO from TR in multiples of MOQ
We need to pick the quantity from the Source Bin only in mulitples of MOQ and leave the quanity which doesnt conform the MOQ in the bin itself.
This process should continue for the next storage type /bin , until the full TR quantity is converted into TO
We tried using the exit EXIT_SAPLL05A_001, but it didnt help.
Please advise how we should proceed.Is this something we cannot do with User exit..?
Because in my User exit, I have made control not to pick the quantity from Source bin which doesnt conform MOQ. When it goes back to Standard program after exit, it is picking the quanity from the source bin which doent conform MOQ.
Note: MOQ - Minimum Order quantity... If MOQ is 3, I want the system to pick the quanity from the source bin in multiples of 3. (I.E...3,6,9,12,15,18......,)
Please advise.. -
How to put bin information to table T_QMAT thru user exit for stock remove?
Hi,
I have already use stock removal strategy 'F' and checked the flag 'User exit active', but the value in table T_QMAT filled by the standard system not include all vendors. So I need to use stock removal strategy " " and set up the table T_QMAT by the user exit.
Do you know what is the user exit and the ABAP coding to put bin information to table T_QMAT for stock removal?
Best Regards,
Chris.Hi Chris,
You can use the exit: EXIT_SAPLL03A_005 to populate t_qmat table based on your requirements. As you have already mentioned, it is important to check the flag: User exit active in SPRO, but bear in mind the stock removal strategy has to be BLANK. If you use F, then standard SAP auto-populates the T_QMAT table.
Regards,
Narendra. -
Hello group!! can you say me how does WM work when I select the picking strategy "No stock removal strat" (blanck)?
I made some tests and it appears to take storage types and bins in an alphabetic order? Am I correct?
thanks!Hello group!! can you say me how does WM work when I select the picking strategy "No stock removal strat" (blanck)?
I made some tests and it appears to take storage types and bins in an alphabetic order? Am I correct?
I don't think that.
If I remove the stock removal strategy and I define only that storage type in the search sequence I get error message L3 008 ("System cannot find source storage bin").
If you fill the storage type search sequence with "***", stringent FIFO will be used:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c6/f845d54afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards,
Csaba -
HI all.
I include a stock removal strategy "F_FIFO" per storage type.
The thing is that when I create a TO for delivery picking or transfer between warehouses TO is created including the origin bin based on this strategy, but how can avoid to follow this strategy when scrapping, for example? Sometimes it is necessary to include manually the origin bin during TO creation or at least, necessary to be changed the one proposed?
Any idea??
Thanks!!!!Hi,
In my opionion, you shoud try to use one of the following exits:
" MWMTO004 - "Own stock removal strategy" (FIFO strategy)
MWMTO013 - "Own stock removal strategy" (stringent FIFO strategy)"
According to SAP documentation, it is possible, to combine standard strategy with your own stock removal strategy. (look at IMG help: Logistic Execution -> Warehouse management -> Strategies -> Stock Removal Strategies -> Develop Extensions for Picking Strategies".
In order to use your logic implemented in user exit, after implementing user exit, you have to mark field "User exit active" in 'Stock removal control' section of respective Storage Type customizing.
good luck - hope it helps.
regards,
w. -
Stock removal FIFO in storage types
Hi...
Multiple storage types AB01, AB02, AB03, AB04 (high rack storage types) are there in EWM warehouse.
Putaway completed,
for article A in AB03 storage type having GR date 09.01.2013
for article A in AB04 storage type having GR date 12.02.2013
for article A in AB02 storage type having GR date 20.03.2013
for article A in AB01 storage type having GR date 12.04.2013
As per FIFO stock removal strategy sequence must be as follows
1. AB03
2. AB04
3. AB02
4. AB01
Currently its going in the sequence AB01, AB02, AB03, AB04.
Can anyone share the FIFO stock removal strategy config
Please suggest how this can be corrected.
SAMHello,
I suggest you to Define Storage Type Group and assign your storage types to Storage Type Group. Then, in your search sequence, you assign Storage Type Group instead of Storage Types.
System will follow the search sequence as you mentioned.
Regards,
Sathish
Maybe you are looking for
-
Why is En start transcoding if it just told me that I do not need to?
have HiDef footage that I edited and exported from Premiere CS3 to Encore CS4 using the BluRay High preset. NTSC, 1440x1080, 23.976 [fps], Progressive PCM Audio, 48 kHz, Stereo VBR, 2 Pass, Target 20.00, Max 25.00 [Mbps] Premiere asked me to save the
-
How to get ATI X1300 to 1600x1200 on DVI?
In Solaris 10, the ATI RADEON X1300 card is supported only by the Vesa driver and not by the Radeon driver in Xorg. Now, using the analog output of the X1300 you can get a monitor resolution of 1600x1200 but if you use the DVI output, it drops back t
-
Hi, I've just recently started to use the 3d function on photoshop cs5 with text. But is there a way so the light on one layer affects other layers instead of having to redo the light for all layers? Thanks
-
I just got a new mac about a week ago, and I was sad to learn that I couldn't play pc games on it without Bootcamp. I started to use this utility, but then I noticed that it said to back up my files on my mac. First of all, is this even necessary (I
-
How to remove white background from a jpeg ?
Hi, i have an all black website as can be found here : http://www.cyclonecupshaker.co.uk and i am having issues with the standard ways of tracing an image. For some reason there is always some white specks that obviously stand out on a black backgrou