Strange Problem While Recording

I have a PushBufferStream that I separated in 4, because the first one have 4 videos multiplexed. Then I tried to record one of the new PushBufferStreams by wrapping it in a new DataSource in a new Processor. I created the DataSink and started to record and it worked well. But the video file generated (an .AVI) have a strange problem. It has the duration of the original DataSource, not the duration of the recording time. If I start the original DataSource now and after one minute record the PushBufferStream by 5 seconds, the video file created have 1minute and 5 seconds. In the first image just a static image (the first frame) is shown, and in the lasts 5 seconds the video is shown normaly.
Does anyone could help me, I don�t know what could I do to solve the problem? Thanks.

just a thought, check how much memory your app is using, is it storing a minuites worth of video in memory, then when yu record for your five seconds, it's dumpng the whole lot into your avi file.
maybe empty your buffer before you record.

Similar Messages

Strange problem while clearing a customer

Hi everybody
I am encountering this strange problem while trying to clear some open items for certain customers. Though these customers have open items on them (checked in BSID and FBL5N), the system is giving a warning message saying that there are no open items on the customers while trying F-30 and F-32.
The only thing that was different for these customers from the rest was that these customers had some transactions which were supposed to be cleared through AP payment run. (transactions for customer payment).
Can anybody explain why the system was not considering these line items as open while accessing F-30 and F-32??

Hi,
- check SAP Note 136754
some table fields in the missing documents using Transaction SE16. The following conditions must exist:
BSIS-XOPVW = X      (Indicator: Open item management, only for G/L                     accounts)
BSEG-XOPVW = X      (Indicator: Open item management)
BSEG-AUGBL = space (clearing document number)
BSEG-DISBN = space (discount document number)
BKPF-BSTAT = space (document status)
BKPF-XSTOV = space (indicator reversal flag)
REGUS/REGUP -> see below
Should one or more conditions not exist, please note the following information:
1. BSEG-XOPVW <> X or BSIS-XOPVW <> X for G/L account line items:
              The line item presumably comes from a time before you activated the open item management of a G/L account. Documents before this master record change do not contain this technical information. Use report RFSEPA02 if you want to bring the documents in line with the new master record. You must refer to the documentation of this report.
              Because there may be problems subsequently acivating open item management, RFSEPA02 was changed as of Release 4.5A so that it cannot be started without modifications. SAP wants to make sure you are familiar with the problems, which may result from activating open item management. You can however restart RFSEPA02 when you have deactivated the line:
              leave program.
2. BSEG-XOPVW <> X for open item account line items:
              This data status is not allowed. Contact the SAP Hotline.
3. BSEG-DISBN <> space.
              The line item has already been used within bill of exchange accounting.
4. BKPF-BSTAT <> space.
              This is a document with a special function, for example a sample document or recurring entry document. Generally these are not taken into account in clearing transactions.
5. BKPF-XSTOV <> space.
              The document was flagged for reversal. Only if you cancel the reversal flag, can you clear the document again. You can do this by removing the planned date for the reverse posting (BKPF-STODT) in the document header using Transaction FB02 (Change document).
6. REGUS/REGUP:
              Look at table REGUS using Transaction SE16. Enter the account (KONKO) in the selection screen. If you selected an entry, use the information Run date (LAUFD) and Identification (LAUFI) in Transaction F110 (payment program). Check the status of the payment run. If only the proposal was carried out, the documents proposed for payment are blocked for other clearing transactions. It is only when you delete the proposal run that the items are taken into account again in the clearing transaction.
Rgds.

Battery problem while recording videos.

I got my ipod touch 5 1 month ago. I got a problem while recording videos. The battery was around 40 percent, but after I recorded a video for about 1-2 minutes. The 20% was popup, then it turned off automatically. While I turn on it, the battery will be about 30 percent. It happened several times. Is this normal?
Does anyone have the same problem?
Thanks!

Hi,
Please refer the below link...
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=20842
Kuber

Stereo Audio Record problem (While recording video as well)

Hi,
I just just bought Sony Xperia C3 dual yesterday. I'm having problem with audio recording. I installed the Sony audio recorder from Google play store but while recording in stereo mode with it the gain suddenly drops after 1/2 second(s). Same problem while recording a video with stock camera app as well, video quality is fine but the audio with it is,just worst. Tried third party app like regorge pro but faced the same problem. Tried disabling the AGC with it, but no good. Recording in mono mode just works fine and I get clear record.
Any solution?
Thanks.

@uliwooly This one i recorded today morning. The audio starts good & clear at the begining but just after one second it drops & then you can hear the bus engine sounds like waterfall. Here is the youtube link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5H1jNxyYMlw Here's another video uploaded by a review site with the same problem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3vKwydfN6U & more from youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GLLj2ommP4 then i used a third party audio recorder with mic switch option https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6d4uAEZFRE as usual with the rear mic the gain suddenly drops after second & you can hear some weird sounds like a "movie bomb" sound at 00:04, "rattle snake" sound at 00:05 & 00:12 & with the front mic starts at 00:17 you can hear the difference. It's mono but so clear & sharp. Finally, as i dont have the mic swith option while recording video, all videos i record will have the same problem. This is definitely not the typical "sony" thing to carry on.

I'm having a problem while recording a video

'm having a problem while recording a video
When the memory card and the highest quality ..
Stop and is working
I recorded video works normally on the memory card.

Nokia C5-00 5MP

Strange problem while execution of query....

Hi Friends
I am facing a strange problem while executing the query.
I have one query ,its old one ,till yesterday everday it was working fine ,
But today i am trying to execute that query ,execution process takes very long time ,finally no response from bw server.
its an important report in our company
I checked query , Every thing is ok ,bze i haven't made any changes
So i need some suggetions .like where can i check and what can i do?
ASAP .... So Please ...its very urgent....
EVERY THING AND ANY THING WILL BE REWARED
Thanks in advance
RK

Hi
Stefan
Thank you for your valuable suggestion
the problem is solved
Already i assigned points.
Thnaks & Regards
RK

How to fix the delay problem while recording? Can't set the Latency to 0. Win7, CS6,Realtek,C03u Mic

I am using Win7, with CS6, Realtek soundcard and Samson C03U microphone.
There is a problem that's really been bothering me. When I record songs the recorded audio always comes 0.1 seconds after where it's supposed to be and I need to fix the problem every time. How to fix the delay problem while recording? I can't set the Latency to zero. The minimum is 30ms and I still get an obvious delay.
I saw some previous discussions saying that installing ASIO would help. Is it gonna work on my PC?
Thank you in advance guys.

You probably should look at a more 'serious' audio interface rather than the Realtek
Yes ASIO drivers are the way to go
If you want zero latency you need to monitor via your audio hardware (hence the 'serious' audio interface suggestion)
There are a heap of reasonable audio interfaces which will do the job for you that are pretty inexpensive and I'm sure that someone will jump in with a suggestion

Strange problem while building a secondary index.

Hi,
I have a strange problem in creating a secondary index which is a part of primary data.
I tested my program and a working sample program
My data scheme looks like:
   Key = unique string
   Data = structure {
                    time_t timestamp;
    Secondary Key = timestamp in data (NOT unique)
My BDB environment flags is "DB_CREATE | DB_INIT_CDB | DB_INIT_MPOOL | DB_THREAD"
The primary DB is created as BTREE with a custom key compare function provided by calling DB->set_bt_compare.
int my_key_compare(DB *db, const DBT *key1, const DBT *key2)
     const char *k1_v = (const char *)key1->data;
     const char *k2_v = (const char *)key2->data;
     return strcmp(k1_v, k2_v);
The secondary Index DB is created as BTREE while permitting duplication. (DB_DUPSORT)
It has two custom callback functions; one for data compare, the other for extracting a data from the primary data.
int my_extract_timestamp(DB *db, const DBT *primary_key, const DBT *primary_data, DBT *secdondary_key)
     secondary_key->data = ( (MY_DATA *)(primary_data->data))->timestamp;
     secondary_key->size = sizeof(time_t);
     return 0;
int my_secondary_dup_compare(DB *db, const DBT *key1, const DBT *key2)
     time_t      k1_v = *(time_t *)key1->data;
     time_t      k2_v = *(time_t *)key2->data;
     return k1_v - k2_v;
The function 'my_extract_timestamp' is set by calling DB->associate().
My problem is 'my_secondary_dup_compare' function called with a strange DBT values.
I think the values should point to the value provided from my_extract_timestamp(), but they pointed to
the key which provided when calling DB->put on the primary DB.
Could somebody help me ?
Any help highly appreciated.

Hi,
In the secondary database, the key is what you extract and the data is the key of the primary database. As your primary key is a unique string, your data in secondary database is also a unique string. The DB->set_dup_compare sets the comparison function for the duplicate data, so you are comparing time stamps on unique strings, not on what you extract.
As you are comparing the time stamps which are the keys of secondary database, I guess here you want to set the bt_compare function instead of the dup_compare for the secondary database.
Also, about this sentence:
secondary_key->data = ( (MY_DATA *)(primary_data->data))->timestamp;
The DBT.data should be an address, but this is a value here instead of an address.
Regards,
Winter, Oracle Berkeley DB

Pause button problem while recording audio

Someone talked about that problem on another post but I think
that problem deserve a post for it...
We have a probleme when using the pause button while
recording audio on a slide.
If we hit the pause button, it completely deletes all
previous recording in the slide.
If someone have a long text to read for a slide he cannot
take a break and think if everything is ok. Our clients are
disappointed and calls this function.
Do you have an idea when that problem will be solved ?
Thank

Hi Edji, I could not agree more. We reported this to Adobe
months ago and it has been acknowledged, but no information will be
made availlable about any fix release date. We have over 500 staff
users making recordings using Presenter and have trained the
majority on version 6. Imagine the number of supports calls we have
had to deal with when suddenly the pause button deletes all
previous slide recordings in version 7.
Depsite many attampts to get a resolution for this we have
had nothing aside from the suggestion above which certainly does
not fix the issue. It is a significant bug in the program that has
caused us endless hours of support work.
We are quite dissappointed at present with the lack of
reponse to the need for a fix and are currently evaluating a number
of other products.
Pityful but true.

Strange problem while login to SCN in Internet explorer

Dear All,
I am facing a strange problem, where i am unable to login into SCN through Internet explorer, as when i click logon button a blank screen is coming and the login screen is not opening.Its happening both in my office and house.
This question i am posting through google chrome, where i am able to get the below screen.
The attached image is what i am getting i am talking about
Is this problem coming for everyone,kindly let me know.As in my office we are using only Internet explorer and i am unable to work on SCN.
Kindly let me know bout it.Since i am active in this module, i am posting the question here.
Thanks&Regards
Darshan Desai

Hi,
Please repost at SCN Support to get quick solution.
IE 9 is best suitable for our forum. IE 11 is not working as required. I am also using Google Chrome at home. But at office i am using IE9.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

A strange problem while Solaris9 CC compile union

I met a strange question while using solaris9 CC to compile my code.
These codes looks like as following:
typedef
struct {
int len;
union {
DWORD u;
#if BYTE_ORDER == BIG_ENDIAN
struct {
BYTE ext1 : 1;
BYTE codingStd : 2;
BYTE infoTransCap : 5;
BYTE ext2 : 1;
BYTE transMode : 2;
BYTE infoTransRate : 5;
BYTE ext3 : 1;
BYTE rateMutiplier : 7;
BYTE ext4 : 1;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
} U4;
struct {
BYTE EXT1 : 1;
BYTE CODINGSTD : 2;
BYTE INFOTRANSCAP : 5;
BYTE EXT2 : 1;
BYTE TRANSMODE : 2;
BYTE INFOTRANSRATE : 5;
BYTE EXT3 : 1;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE : 8;
} U3;
#elif BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN
struct {
BYTE infoTransCap : 5;
BYTE codingStd : 2;
BYTE ext1 : 1;
BYTE infoTransRate : 5;
BYTE transMode : 2;
BYTE ext2 : 1;
BYTE rateMutiplier : 7;
BYTE ext3 : 1;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE ext4 : 1;
} U4;
struct {
BYTE INFOTRANSCAP : 5;
BYTE CODINGSTD : 2;
BYTE EXT1 : 1;
BYTE INFOTRANSRATE : 5;
BYTE TRANSMODE : 2;
BYTE EXT2 : 1;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE EXT3 : 1;
BYTE : 8;
} U3;
#endif /* BYTE_ORDER */
}_U;
} CaBEARER, *CaLPBEARER;
at xxx.cpp , I write some codes:
bearer._U.U3.EXT1 = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.CODINGSTD = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.INFOTRANSCAP = 0x08;
bearer._U.U3.EXT2 = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.TRANSMODE = 0x00;
bearer._U.U3.INFOTRANSRATE = 0x00;
bearer._U.U3.EXT3 = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.LAYER1IDENT = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.USERINFOLAYER = 0x05;
But I compile it, CC reports these errors
Error: Badly formed expression.
Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
What' wong with these codes? how to do ?
Thank you!

At a.h
typedef
struct {
int len;
union {
DWORD u;
#if BYTE_ORDER == BIG_ENDIAN
struct {
BYTE ext1 : 1;
BYTE codingStd : 2;
BYTE infoTransCap : 5;
BYTE ext2 : 1;
BYTE transMode : 2;
BYTE infoTransRate : 5;
BYTE ext3 : 1;
BYTE rateMutiplier : 7;
BYTE ext4 : 1;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
} U4;
struct {
BYTE EXT1 : 1;
BYTE CODINGSTD : 2;
BYTE INFOTRANSCAP : 5;
BYTE EXT2 : 1;
BYTE TRANSMODE : 2;
BYTE INFOTRANSRATE : 5;
BYTE EXT3 : 1;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE : 8;
} U3;
#elif BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN
struct {
BYTE infoTransCap : 5;
BYTE codingStd : 2;
BYTE ext1 : 1;
BYTE infoTransRate : 5;
BYTE transMode : 2;
BYTE ext2 : 1;
BYTE rateMutiplier : 7;
BYTE ext3 : 1;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE ext4 : 1;
} U4;
struct {
BYTE INFOTRANSCAP : 5;
BYTE CODINGSTD : 2;
BYTE EXT1 : 1;
BYTE INFOTRANSRATE : 5;
BYTE TRANSMODE : 2;
BYTE EXT2 : 1;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE EXT3 : 1;
BYTE : 8;
} U3;
#endif /* BYTE_ORDER */
}_U;
} CaBEARER, *CaLPBEARER;
At b.cpp
#include "a.h"
CaBEARER bearer;
1:bearer._U.U3.EXT1 = 0x01;
2:bearer._U.U3.CODINGSTD = 0x01;
3:bearer._U.U3.INFOTRANSCAP = 0x08;
4:bearer._U.U3.EXT2 = 0x01;
5:bearer._U.U3.TRANSMODE = 0x00;
6:bearer._U.U3.INFOTRANSRATE = 0x00;
7:bearer._U.U3.EXT3 = 0x01;
8:bearer._U.U3.LAYER1IDENT = 0x01;
9:bearer._U.U3.USERINFOLAYER = 0x05;
But I compile it, CC reports these errors
Line 1:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 1:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 2:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 2:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 3:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 3:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 4:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 4:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 5:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 5:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 6:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 6:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 7:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 7:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 7:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 8:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 8:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 9:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 9:Error: Badly formed expression.

Strange problem while syncronizing catalog

I am doing a syncronization, once every two weeks or so. Since I started using Lightroom 3 (now 3.3) I end up with a very strange problem, that makes it almost impossible to sync the catalog.
I get the window were it tells me to "add" pictures or movies without "moving" the images, then after I push the buttom it only takes a moment before I get up a dialog box were it tells me; " Community toolbar" with bold text and then "We're sorry, but the Safari browser version you are currently using does not support the community toolbar"
If I do not push "OK", so that the dialog box dissapeare the syncronization will not move on. For every image I want to ad the same dialog box appears and I have to push "ok" again.
Do not understand this at all. I have tried to update the Safari. I also been in contact with the phone support that could not help me.
Anyone?
// Torbjorn

Hello
I use Mac OSX 10.6.6
Do not have any add-ons
And Yes it is when I syncronize the hole catalog. In the catalog I have several folders.
//Torbjorn

Problem while recording BDC

Hello Gurus,
My problem is when i run through PA40 Hiring action,the dynamic actions are working properly,but when i do the recording dynamic actions infotype screens are coming up.Could anybody help me on this.
Thanking all in Advance.
Regards,
Manoj.

That is the Std behavior of Dynamic Actions. You have to code for such infotypes with separate transaction calls.PL check the OSS Note# 386027 wherein the Dynamic Actions are explained in detail.
~Suresh

Problem while Recording Result

Hi,
While performing result recording using QE01, I am getting error like
The operation does not exist for the insp lot (and work center) entered
Please help

Hi,
Please refer the below link...
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=20842
Kuber

Strange problem while executing the Query.......

Hi,
I have created a new query and I am facing the strange behaviour.
When I execute it , it works fine but when one of my colleague execute it , it does not return any value for one of the Price variable.
It works fine with most of the people I have checked except one.
Can somebody let me know the reason.....?
Thanks , Jeetu

Hello,
If it is authorization problem go to transaction st01 and mark the first check for authorization. Under filter insert the user. Click Trace On.
Execute the query with that user and just after the lack of authorization message click trace off.
Read the trace.
Do the same with your user and compare the log of the two.
You'll see what is missing.
Assign points if helpful.
Diogo.

Strange Problem While Recording

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for