Strange SQL statement in my PL/SQL session

Hi all,
i found a very strange SQL statement in my session.
SELECT 1
FROM SYS.streams$_prepare_ddl p
WHERE ( (p.global_flag = 1 AND :1 IS NULL)
OR (p.global_flag = 0 AND p.usrid = :2)
AND ROWNUM = 1;
This statement is waiting latch wait event but consistent get higher and higher.
This session seems didn't execute my PL/SQL's main logic and halt at this statement.
And after 5 or 6 hours this session is error out with snapshot too old.
Does anyone know what this statement doing? according to Metalink for create table and create user statement will trigger this statement. But why it takes so long?
Looking forward for your advise...

If you have a problem with latch events, then maybe this session or another session is doing a similar action quite often and using the latches.
I would check for some part of you application that constantly tries to create tables and/or users. Maybe it is possible to change that logic. E.g. use global temp tables.
Also post your database version. Did you migrate recently or is it a fresh install?
@user594309: Think more before posting. And read up about bind variables.

Similar Messages

TestStand Open SQL Statement does not support SQL's ORDER BY clause???

TestStand 1.0.3
Windows 2000 SP1
SQL Server 2000 Personal
You've got to be kidding me...
It appears that the built-in TestStand Open SQL Step does NOT support the
"ORDER BY" clause in the SELECT statement, even though the documentation
says it does. Is this true?
I have an Open SQL Statement query:
"SELECT * FROM [MyTable] WHERE ([Batch ID]=1234)"
it works fine, returning a correct record count 120 records. If I change
the Open SQL Statement query simply by adding an ORDER BY clause, such as:
"SELECT * FROM [MyTable] WHERE ([Batch ID]=1234) ORDER BY [MyField] ASC"
it returns a record count of zero. I know that "MyField" exists in the
MyTable table and contains valid data. The
second query works fine in SQL
Server Enterprise Manager.
Am I missing something? Is it true that the TestStand Open SQL Step does
NOT support the "ORDER BY" clause? If not, what &#$!ing good is it and why
does the manual state it is supported? Is there any other way using just
the TestStand steps to order a database recordset on one or more fields?
Any help would be appreciated.
Grrrrr....
Bob Rafuse
Etec Inc.

> Bob -
> The database step types do not do anything special to the SQL command
> that you give it. The step just passes the command to the ADO
> provider. I tried a simple query using the step types with the
> following command,
>
> "SELECT UUT_RESULT.* FROM UUT_RESULT WHERE ([UUT_SERIAL_NUMBER] =
> 12345) ORDER BY [EXECUTION_TIME] ASC"
>
> and this return the expected results and the record count parameter
> was as expected. I tried this on TS 1.0.2 and TS 2.0 with MS Access
> 2000 and MS SQL Server 7.0. I do not have MS SQL Server 2000 at this
> time.
>
> It would be surprised if the step types are messing something up.
I've been doing some experimenting over the past couple of days. Simple,
one-table queries seem to handle the ORDER BY clause fine. Th
ings seem to
get messed up when I try multi-table queries with ORDER BY clause with the
TestStand database steps. I get no errors but the returned record counts
are always 0 with the ORDER BY and positive without the ORDER BY. The exact
same queries work fine in Visual Basic/ADO and the SQL Server Query
Analyzer.
> Questions:
> 1. Have you verified whether the data is actually returned even though
> the record count is zero?
Hmmm... yes data IS getting returned (at least on the two instances I just
checked), but the record count is always zero. I was not proceeding with
processing if the record count was 0.
Still... I don't know how to loop through the recordset without knowing how
many records there are an not eventually generate an error by passing EOF.
Is there another way using the TestStand database steps to determine a) the
number of records in the recordset or b) when I'm at EOF?
> 2. Are you using any advanced options on the Opend SQL Statement step
> type, specifically
the cursor type set to forward only? Forward only
> cursors do not allow for record counts.
Everything on the Advanced tab of the Open SQL Statement step is set to "Use
Default".
Bob.

Run second sql statement only if first sql statement is null.

Hey guys I seem to have a mental block here. I have two sql statements. I would like the second to run only if the first sql statement is null.I know i can potentially use PLsql but would really like to see if i can do this with straight up sql. Your responses are very very appreciated.
here is the first sql
Select     ft.fund_code,
             ft.orgn_code,
             ft.acct_code,
             ft.amount,
             fb.owner_pidm,
             ft.prog_code
      from ftrbremb fb , ftcractg ft
      where fb.doc_code = 'TR000038'
      and fb.ftpbport_id = ft.ftpbport_idsecond sql statement
     Select ft.fund_code,
             ft.orgn_code,
             ft.acct_code,
             ft.amount,
             fb.owner_pidm,
             ft.prog_code
      from ftrbremb fb , ftcractg ft, ftprexps fx
      where fb.doc_code = 'TR000038'
      --and fb.ftpbport_id = ft.ftpbport_id
      and fx.ftrbremb_id = fb.id
      and ft.ftprexps_id = fx.id;How can i combine these two statements together so that when the first one is null the second one runs. As a bonus i like to get just the first row as well.
Any help would greatly appreciated. I tried to accomplish with case statement but it just dosent seem to be working for me.
Thanks

select ft.fund_code, ft.orgn_code, ft.acct_code, ft.amount, fb.owner_pidm, ft.prog_code
from ftrbremb fb, ftcractg ft
where fb.doc_code = 'TR000038'
   and fb.ftpbport_id = ft.ftpbport_id
union all
select ft.fund_code, ft.orgn_code, ft.acct_code, ft.amount, fb.owner_pidm, ft.prog_code
from ftrbremb fb, ftcractg ft, ftprexps fx
where fb.doc_code = 'TR000038'
   --and fb.ftpbport_id = ft.ftpbport_id
   and fx.ftrbremb_id = fb.id
   and ft.ftprexps_id = fx.id
   and not exists
         (select null
            from ftrbremb fb, ftcractg ft
           where fb.doc_code = 'TR000038'
             and fb.ftpbport_id = ft.ftpbport_id)

Logging/viewing SQL statements generated by the SQL Developer IDE?

I know it is possible to view the SQL statements that the SQL Developer IDE generates to fetch result-sets from the database whenever one performs any action - say expanding the "Tables" node for a database, for example. I would appreciate if someone could point out how this functionality could be enabled.
Thanks,
RG

In 1.0, you could use the AddVMOption -Daudit.trace=db_api option inside the sqldeveloper.conf file.
In 1.1 however, I don't get output inside the console anymore (for expanding trees, etc.).
Kris, has this option been replaced by another one? Please let us in on all the fun ;-)
K.

Unable to execute the following sql statement in Jdev10g -- custom sql quer

Hi All,
I have requirement where I need to execute the below Query String through Jdev10g to Sql Server 2005.
Query string -- select * from table where #InputString
<< Input String -- col3 like 'col%' and col1 like 'col2%' ...... >>
Here the Input string will be generated by the client and the results will be transferred back to the client. Can any one help how to do this? Input string would like
col1 like 'col%' and col2 like 'col2%' and so on.. and this is dynamic which can be changed in runtime like col3 like 'col3%' and col1 like 'col1%' and so on..
I have tokenized the string and assinged the values and executed the custom string through Input parameters for all the fileds instead of only search string .. since table having so many null fields not receiving the exact row counts and records.. hence I have to pass only the Input string as I mentioned like Query String.. If some body got the same concern please let me know..
Your help would be greatly appreciated..
Thanks & Regards,
Khasim

Hi All,
Even though the answer is a bit tedious by formulating the where clause with all fields and dynamic parameters, I achieved the goal. But we do have another option to use orcl:query-database in the transformation. But this one give tedious results when you are trying to achieve multiple rows from this. If some one have a better idea to utilize this query-database function, you are most welcome.
Thanks & Regards,
Khasim

Should i use nested SQL Statements? or PL/SQL?

here is my table:
let's call this table total_stats, with 2 fields (columns) Date and Total.
Row | Total
ROW1 | 12508
ROW2 | 12526
I am going crazy trying to write some sql or pl/sql that will give me the following results: the result of row2Total - row1Total. I need the delta of the two Total's rows.
Is there an easy way to do this without writing multiple nested sql statments?
Should i write a procedure that uses cursors to help me get my end result?
thanks

Use analytic functions - LAG and LEAD - to access other rows in the result set in a current row. This should get you started:
SQL> create table total_stats as
2 select sysdate-1 as some_date, 12508 as some_value from dual
3 union all
4 select sysdate as some_date, 12526 as some_value from dual
5 /
Table created.
SQL> select * from total_stats;
SOME_DATE SOME_VALUE
12/11/2007      12508
13/11/2007      12526
2 rows selected.
SQL> select
2    some_date,
3    some_value as this_dates_value,
4    lag(some_value) over (order by some_date) as the_previous_dates_value
5 from
6    total_stats
7 /
SOME_DATE THIS_DATES_VALUE THE_PREVIOUS_DATES_VALUE
12/11/2007            12508
13/11/2007            12526                    12508
2 rows selected.

Executing multiple sql statements from a single sql file

Hi, I am Vijay Krishna.
I want to drop user, drop tablespace, create tablespace and create user from a single executable file or a single sql file. The command should be in sequence. How can we achieve it? Can I anybody help me in this regard. I want this as soon as possible. It's urgent. Kindly post a reply.
Also, how can we know the oracle home directory from a java program? The problem is we should know the Oracle home directory and use it for creating the tablespace. In the userinterface we will give just for a new database user creation. I will be really thankfull if anybody can help me in this regard.

It is showing any error messages.
I will diplay the entire batch file which we are using.
sqlplus / as sysdba
drop user examination cascade;
drop tablespace examination;
create tablespace examination
datafile 'C:\oracle\product\10.1.0\oradata\orcl\examination.dbf'
size 500M autoextend on;
create user examination identified by examination
default tablespace examination
quota unlimited on examination;
grant connect, resource to examination;
exit;
when i run the batch file from the DOS prompt it is entering into the sql prompt and coming out in a fraction of a second. We are just seeing a screen coming and going. But no error messages are being displayed.
first we thought that as we are giving the create tablespace and create user in the same file we created another file and tried without having the create commands. Even then the user didn't get dropped.

Print out sql statement

Is there any way to print out a sql statement to a window when using on session?
I have a sql select statement which looks like the following:
SQL SELECT * FROM table_name
WHERE column_a = :Value1
ON SESSION lDBSession;
I would like to be able to pring out the statement that was actually executed.
Does anyone have any ideas how this can be done without rewriting the sql?
Thanks,
KRC

Try trace flags
trc:db:2:1 prints all the sql statements processed by the database session
trc:db:2:50 shows input values for the sql statement
On the DB Sessiob.

INSERT Script stored as "SQL Statement Script" not firing on Oracle Alert

We are using Alert Manager to run Alerts based on absence information in EBS R12.1.3 HR tables.
Application: Human Resources
Period/Event: Periodic
Frequency: Every Day
The Alert has 2 actions.
One is to email a supervisor based on the Alert SQL finding staff who have had x number of absences over a set period of time.
That is working fine.
The other action is defined as an "SQL Statement Script".
The SQL script inserts the variables defined in the SQL from the main Alert definition SQL, into a custom table.
When the Alert fires, we are getting the email generated, but the INSERT statement isn't firing.
However, when we look at the result of the Alert when it has run, and look at the steps which were fired, we can see the email step and the SQL step. When we look at the SQL in the SQL step which was generated, we can copy and paste it direct into TOAD and it works fine.
We have tried a simple SQL INSERT statement which even just does:
INSERT INTO xx_tmp (VALUE1_DATE, VALUE2) VALUES (SYSDATE, 'this');
But even that does not work.
We wonder if the issue is that we cannot do a direct INSERT from an alert type of "SQL Statement Script"?
We have found another Alert which does a direct UPDATE on a table, but the SQL Statement Script definition has "Purchasing" as the Application, because it's updating a PO table.
In our case, we're trying to insert into a custom table held in our in-house XX schema.
Could the problem be that we don't have the "Application" set? If that's the case, we don't have a corresponding application anyway.
Or can we not do a direct INSERT like this - do we need to use a package instead, and call that?
Any advice much appreciated.
Thanks

Hi Brian,
Alert issue - Custom SQL fix
1. Define actions via "Actions" button on Alert Definition
2. Create an action for e.g. "Send Message to Supervisor"
   Action type: message
   Action - sends email to people
3. Create another action called e.g. "Insert Record"
   Action type: SQL Statement Script
   Fill in SQL in the "Text" section, no need to add a begin or end bit, just a simple INSERT INTO X etc ending with a semi colon
4. Back on the main alert definition window, go to "Action Sets" button
   Here, need one SEQ for the Message / Email (e.g. Seq 1), and then click on "Action Set Details" and click on "Members" tab and select the "Send Message to Supervisor" Action
   Then close the "Action Set Details" window, and return to the "Action Sets" window
   click into 2nd line, add e.g. Seq 2, and call it e.g. "Insert Record", click on "Action Set Details" > Members tab and select the "Insert Record" The problem was that in the first instance, we had a single Action Set, and under "Members" had selected the "Send Message to Supervisor" and "Insert Record" at the same time.
Short answer: each Action needs to be defined as a separate line in the Action Sets definition.
I can send screenshots if you need them, and don't mind putting your email address on this forum.
You can always edit the thread after I've emailed you, to remove your email address.

How to run a SQL statement which is stored inside an SQL Table

Hello,
If anyone please help me with the following problem I would be forever grateful
I have an SQL statement which is stored inside a certain SQL table, I want to use that SQL statement inside my PL/SQL procedure.
Was thinking of a simple solution of obtaining the SQL statement into an array and then execute it, yet how could I do so exactly with PL/SQL? I've only started playing around with PL/SQL in the last few days.
Thanks in advance!
This is how it looks like more or less:
Displaying result for:
SELECT TRIM(OBJ_VALU_TXT)
FROM OBJ_VALU_DOC
WHERE OBJECT_TYPE = 'FLD'
AND OBJECT_CODE = 15443
AND OBJ_VALU_CD = 'ACR'
ORDER BYDOC_SEQ_NO
00001
SELECT
VALUE(MAX(RECEIPT_NO) + 1, :OUT-COMP-FACTOR)
FROM RECEIPT
WHERE (RECEIPT_NO BETWEEN
:OUT-COMP-FACTOR AND :OUT-TO-NUMBER) OR
(RECEIPT_NO > :OUT-COMP-FACTOR AND
:OUT-TO-NUMBER = 0)

Here's a demo of your requirement.
create table t ( col1 varchar2(200));
table created
insert into t values('select * from dual');
1 row inserted
declare
v_col varchar2(200);
v_val varchar2(200);
begin
select col1 into v_col from t;
execute immediate v_col into v_val;
dbms_output.put_line(v_val);
end;
X
Using into clause, you can use as many variables as required. But the basic approach reamins the same.
But storing SQL in DB is not an efficient design.
Ishan

Same WITH used in many SQL statements

Hi,
I have a need to use the same WITH clause in many places of my code. Is it ever possible to code without writing the same code in every SQL which need my WITH?
Thanks in advance.

As Tubs mentioned, views.
There only 2 basic methods of modularisation of SQL source code. Using the WITH clause (modularises in the same statement), or VIEWS (modularises across SQL statements).
Using PL/SQL functions or pipelined tables are poor choices for SQL code modularisation. And should not be considered. These tools address a different set of requirements.

Setting the sql statement

http://www.egbolig.dk/drift_bo_syd.rpt (HERE IS THE REPORT)
We are using SAP Crystal Report .NET Runtime files (http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-7824 newest version 13.0.9.1312) in our web asp.net application. Everything have been working fine, but we have can into problems when showing the certain kinda reports.
In our code get the reports sql statement using getSQLStatement.
Dim gp As New GroupPath() Dim sql As String = report.ReportClientDocument.RowsetController.GetSQLStatement(gp)
This will get the sql, and we use this sql (getSqlStatement) and attach a sql WHERE clause from the code to only get a certain number of records.
The report Drift_bo_syd.rpt has 5 tables, and the following sql statement.
Database/Show Sql Statement
SELECT "rekvstam"."Sel", "rekvstam"."Afd", "rekvstam"."Levadresse", "rekvstam"."Rekvisition", "rekvstam"."Lejemaal", "rekvstam"."Lejer", "rekvstam"."Udfoertaf", "rekvstam"."Udfoertdato", "rekvstam"."Krit", "Selskab"."Adresse", "Selskab"."Postby", "Selskab"."Tlf", "Selskab"."Fax", "rekvstam"."Kontor", "rekvstam"."Hjemme", "rekvstam"."Rekvdato", "rekvstam"."Aftale", "rekvstam"."InitialRet", "rekvstam"."Arbejde", "kreditor"."Att", "rekvstam"."Konto", "Selskab"."Navn", "Selskab"."Email", "Interessentadresse"."Navn", "Interessentadresse"."Adresse", "Interessentadresse"."Postby", "Interessentadresse"."Email1", "Interessentadresse"."Telefon_Fax", "Interessentadresse"."Type", "Interessentadresse"."Tlf1", "rekvstam"."tlfLejer", "kreditor"."Kred", "Interessentadresse"."Interessentnr" FROM (("Rekvstam" "rekvstam" INNER JOIN "Selskab" "Selskab" ON "rekvstam"."Sel"="Selskab"."Sel") LEFT OUTER JOIN "Kreditor" "kreditor" ON "rekvstam"."Kred"="kreditor"."Kred") INNER JOIN "Interessentadresse" "Interessentadresse" ON "kreditor"."Interessentnr"="Interessentadresse"."Interessentnr" WHERE "Interessentadresse"."Type"='K'
But if we run the report from our asp.net code, we get the following error:
Cannot determine the queries necessary to get data for this report. Failed to retrieve data from the database. Error in File Drift_Bo_Syd {97FED382-1BAC-4DB1-970F-9E098ECE28F1}.rpt: Failed to retrieve data from the database.
After a long time searching for a solution, we found out that if we place the column kred from the kreditor table on the report, the report will work. (field explorer / database fields / kreditor (table) / kred (column)
Very important is that the field "kreditor.kred" is a primary key of the table kreditor, and also used in the linking.!
(We can get the report to work if we call the sql statement with the "kreditor"."kred" in the SELECT statement.
SELECT "kreditor"."kred", "rekvstam"."Sel", "rekvstam"."Afd", "rekvstam"."Levadresse", "rekvstam"."Rekvisition", "rekvstam"."Lejemaal", "rekvstam"."Lejer", "rekvstam"."Udfoertaf", "rekvstam"."Udfoertdato", "rekvstam"."Krit", "Selskab"."Adresse", "Selskab"."Postby", "Selskab"."Tlf", "Selskab"."Fax", "rekvstam"."Kontor", "rekvstam"."Hjemme", "rekvstam"."Rekvdato", "rekvstam"."Aftale", "rekvstam"."InitialRet", "rekvstam"."Arbejde", "kreditor"."Att", "rekvstam"."Konto", "Selskab"."Navn", "Selskab"."Email", "Interessentadresse"."Navn", "Interessentadresse"."Adresse", "Interessentadresse"."Postby", "Interessentadresse"."Email1", "Interessentadresse"."Telefon_Fax", "Interessentadresse"."Type", "Interessentadresse"."Tlf1", "rekvstam"."tlfLejer", "kreditor"."Kred", "Interessentadresse"."Interessentnr" FROM (("Rekvstam" "rekvstam" INNER JOIN "Selskab" "Selskab" ON "rekvstam"."Sel"="Selskab"."Sel") LEFT OUTER JOIN "Kreditor" "kreditor" ON "rekvstam"."Kred"="kreditor"."Kred") INNER JOIN "Interessentadresse" "Interessentadresse" ON "kreditor"."Interessentnr"="Interessentadresse"."Interessentnr" WHERE "Interessentadresse"."Type"='K'
But it should not be necessary to include this field (which is the primary key and used in linking the report) in the sql statement,
BECAUSE it is not used in the report. So maybe this is a bug?
It has not been necessary in RDC Crystal Report or RAS Crystal Report in a classic asp envoriment.
Here is the code we use to set the reports SQL Statement)
Try
Dim conn As New SqlConnection(connString)
conn.Open()
Dim sd As New SqlDataAdapter(New SqlCommand(nySQL, conn))
Dim ds As New Data.DataSet()
Dim navn As String = report.Database.Tables.Item(0).Name
sd.Fill(ds, navn)
report.SetDataSource(ds)
conn.Close()
Catch ex As Exception
Throw
End Try

Hi Jan
I understand your problem completely but we have asked R&D to be able to edit the SQL and they explained due to how the report Engine works it's simply not possible anymore. It would take a complete rewrite in all of our DB drivers and query dll's to be able to allow it. They did that in CR 9 when they rewrote the DB drivers and removed the SQL part of the code into separate dll's and that is when the ability was removed, it's been that way ever since.
One possibility is to get the SQL from the Report and then connect to your DB using a .NET and if the results from the SQL is less than 5K rows and not too many columns you could then set the Report data source to a Dataset.
As long as all of the field names are the same CR will run the report using this work flow.
For data larger than 5K rows, limit is due to memory resources, you could save the DS to an XML file and then set the reports data source to the XML file. We've seen 100meg XML's used so the amount of data should not be a problem, but of course there are limits to everything so test...
This should not affect performance much.
So the work flow would be:
Load the report
Get the SQL Statement
Paste it into a Dataset Query
Something like this should get you started:
//string connString = "Provider=SQLOLEDB;Data Source=MySQLServer;Database=xtreme;User ID=sa;Password=pw";
string connString = "Provider=SQLNCLI10;Server=MySQLServer;Database=xtreme;User ID=sa;Password=pw";
Detail"".""Quantity"" FROM   ""xtreme"".""dbo"".""Orders Detail"" ""Orders Detail""";
string sqlString = @"SELECT top 10* FROM ""xtreme"".""dbo"".""Financials"" ""Financials""";
System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection oleConn = new System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection(connString);
System.Data.OleDb.OleDbCommand cmd = oleConn.CreateCommand();
cmd.CommandText = sqlString;
System.Data.DataSet ds = new System.Data.DataSet();
OleDbDataAdapter oleAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(sqlString, oleConn);
//OleDbDataAdapter oleAdapter2 = new OleDbDataAdapter(sqlString2, oleConn);
DataTable dt1 = new DataTable("Financials");
//DataTable dt2 = new DataTable("Orders Detail");
oleAdapter.Fill(dt1);
//oleAdapter2.Fill(dt2);
ds.Tables.Add(dt1);
//ds.Tables.Add(dt2);
ds.WriteXml("c:\\reports\\sc2.xml", XmlWriteMode.WriteSchema);
// as long as the field names match exactly Cr has no problems setting report to a DS.
try
    rpt.SetDataSource(ds.Tables[0]); // incremtent [0] for more than 1 table.
    rpt.SetDataSource(ds);
catch (Exception ex)
    MessageBox.Show("ERROR: Schema Mismatch. Error reported by CR: " + ex.Message);
//Now check for subreport and set to same DS
foreach (CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.Section section in rpt.ReportDefinition.Sections)
    foreach (CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportObject reportObject in section.ReportObjects)
        if (reportObject.Kind == ReportObjectKind.SubreportObject)
            CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.SubreportObject subReport = (CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.SubreportObject)reportObject;
            CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument subDocument = subReport.OpenSubreport(subReport.SubreportName);
            subDocument.SetDataSource(ds);
And for XML it would use this part, not above I am saving the data and structure in the XML file so it should match what is in the report:
foreach (CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.Table rptTable in rpt.Database.Tables)
    try
        rptTable.Location = btrDataFile.ToString(); // @"D:\Atest\" + rptTable.Location + ".xml";
    catch (Exception ex)
        MessageBox.Show("ERROR: " + ex.Message);
Only issue you may run into is sometimes XML does not have a direct field type and your original data source but you'll get an error if that happens which could be trapped and handled.
If you have a report that only uses 2 tables I do have code that will convert it to use a Command Object. That is the limit the engine is capable of, there is a lot of logic to be able to do this in CRD and the SDK so that is all we could get for now.
I hope that helps
Don

With As subquery block in create view statement or In pl/sql block

Hi All,
Can I use the With as subquery block in create view statement??
or in pl/sql
-Thanks
Edited by: xwo0owx on Mar 31, 2011 11:23 AM
Edited by: xwo0owx on Mar 31, 2011 11:23 AM

Hi, Mike,
Dird wrote:
Then why do I get an error? :s create view mike_test_view as
with carriers as(
SELECT DISTINCT T0.CARRIER_SHORT_NAME carrier_name,
T1.COMP_ID            carrier_id
FROM CS2_CARRIER T0, USER_FUNCTION_QUALIFIER T2, CS2_COMP_SERV_PROV_PROF T1
WHERE (((T1.SERV_PROV_ID = T2.QUALIFIER_VALUE) AND
((T2.FUNCTION_CODE = 'DOC_CCM') AND
(T2.QUALIFIER_CODE = 'CARRIER_LIST'))) AND
(T1.SERV_PROV_ID = T0.SERV_PROV_ID))
ORDER BY T0.CARRIER_SHORT_NAME)
select *
from carriers c;ORA-00942: table or view does not exist -- carriers
If I run every line but the create (just execute the query) it runs fine. It also works fine in a PL/SQL procedure.SQL*Plus abhors a vacuum.
The default in SQL*Plus is that you can not have a completely blank line (that is, a line containing only white space) in the middle of a SQL statement. (Blank lines are okay in PL/SQL, including SQL statements embedded in PL/SQL.)
If you want some space between the end of the WITH clause and the beginning of the main query (or anywhere else, for that matter), you can put comments there. For example:
      ORDER BY T0.CARRIER_SHORT_NAME)
     select *
       from carriers c;Now that line isn't just whitespace; it has the comment sign, and that's enough for SQL*Plus.
You can allow completely blank lines with the SQL*Plus command:
SET   SQLBLANKLINES ON

Not able to View generated SQL statement

Hi,
In order to view the generated SQL statement in Receiver JDBC Adapter,
i have done logSQLStatement as true in CC still not able to view in RWB,
also mesg protocol i m using in CC is "xml sql format", is it bcos of this i am not able to ?
If yes, then how can i see that sql string?
Regards,
Pratibha

Pratibha,
In our JDBC scenario the message protocol is also set to XML SQL Format
The Integration Process has a mapping step of type XSL that uses an Imported Archive to create the SQL select statement. Then there is a synchronous Send step for the JDBC component
Both this SQL statement and the returned SQL result are available in the XML message monitor SXMB_MONI
Regards,
Mike

About hints in sql statements

hi,
can you plz provide any best sides for sql hints?

Suri wrote:
You can learn basics from below site.
http://www.dbasupport.com/oracle/ora9i/index_hints.shtml
What an awful article...
>
Using Index Hints in SQL statements - Cause we know more about our application than Oracle does
Hints are used to give specific information that we know about our data and application, to Oracle. This further improves the performance of our system. There can be instances where the default optimizer may not be efficient for a certain SQL statements. We can specify HINTS with the SQL statements, to improve the efficiency of those SQL statements.
<cut>
By using Hints, you can improve certain SQL statements that might otherwise be inefficient.
>
That is just so wrong and completely misses the point.
If a query is inefficient, then it can be down to poor database design, lack of statistics, lack of correct indexes (sometimes too many indexes), or poorly written SQL statements. Hacking an SQL statement with Hints to try and make it work better because you believe you "know more about our application than Oracle does", shows a complete lack of understanding of the internals of Oracle. Oracle doesn't need to know about the application, but it certainly does need to know about how the data is stored and related on the underlying tables and in the tablespaces and datafiles etc. and it's sure as hell got a better idea about that than any programmer, especially as it can change and adapt in the future as the data changes, which a programmers SQL statements (with fixed hints) won't.
That article is a good example of the wrong attitude towards using hints. Thanks for posting that to demonstrate it.

Strange SQL statement in my PL/SQL session

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for