Subinterface VLAN ID over SNMP?

Hi, suppose i have an interface on router:
interface Fas0/0.123
encapsulation dot1q 234
Is there any way to find out this interface's VLAN ID 234 over SNMP?
I do have a habit to name interface after dot matching VLAN ID, but still...
Tried walking whole snmp tree of router digging for 234, but did not find anything.

Vinod Arya wrote:I think you should check CISCO-VTP-MIB which should have this details. Which MIB did you checked?
It's about switching ports only.
Here is reply from 7201 router, which have plenty subinterfaces:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.46 = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID

Similar Messages

Cisco WLC AP count over SNMP

Hi,
Is it possible to monitore a quantity of AP on Cisco WLC and quantity of wireless clients?
I was found only list of AP names over snmp...
Thanks in advance

Hi, Ralf
If not late
I use script directly in monitoring system
main ()
VALUE=`snmpwalk -v 2c -c xxxCommunityxxx X.X.X.X 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.513.1.1.1.1.2 | wc -l`
echo "Message: Warning! Number of registed APs decriased."
echo "Data:Count"
echo "Count\t$VALUE"
exit 0
main $*
This is shell. but you can use simple only one line
`snmpwalk -v 2c -c xxxCommunityxxx X.X.X.X 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.513.1.1.1.1.2 | wc -l`
(from linux)

Transport dot1q vlan tagging over wan link

Hi,
I would like to transport 802.1Q vlan tagging over a wan link, is it possible ?
I heard about l2tp V3...
Best regards

Hi,
You would have to use a technology such as Ethernet over MPLS (EoMPLS) or VPLS. This technology is referred to as Layer 2 VPNs. You can get more info on this at the following locations:
EoMPLS (part of the Cisco Any Transport over ATM suite):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6646/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html
VPLS:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6648/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html
Hope that helps - pls rate the post if it does.
Regards,
Paresh

CAM-Table over SNMP(ESW-520-48P)

Hi everyone,
I could need some help with our Cisco ESW-520-48P Switches. I want to read the CAM-Table over SNMP and assign each interface the appropiate client device. The problem is that I don't really know how to achive that. I've tested some different MIBs but I can't get the infos which I need.
Thank you very much in forward!

I need to decide on few things
regarding this switch before recommending this switch to my customer. I
have the following questions that i need some expert advice.
Questions
1.)
Does this switch support POE 15.4W on all 48 10/100 ports
(ESW-520-48P-K9). The total power rating of this switch is only 370W
and if this divided with 48 ports, each port can only drive 7W. So thus
the confusion.
2.) Can the ESW Series be Monitored and Managed using Ciscoworks LMS?
3.) Is MGBSX1 compatible with GLC-SX-MM
Thanks.
Hi,
Please see the attached document for your queries !!
Hope to Help !!
Ganesh.H
Remember to rate the helpful post

SPS224G4 crash on show run when features enables over SNMP

Hi.
I got SPS224G4 switch, on which I enable LLDP protocol over SNMP (using snmpset).
Now I can't do "show run" in cli - it crashes, then reboots:
How to replicate:
console# delete startup-config
<reboot>
console# conf term
console(config)# snmp-server enable
console(config)# snmp-server community secret1 rw
console(config)# exit
console# write
>snmpset -v2c -c secret1 <switch_ip> 1.3.6.1.4.1.3955.89.110.1.1.1.0 i 1
CISCOSB-LLDP-MIB::rlLldpEnabled.0 = INTEGER: true(1)
console# show run
interface range ethernet e(1-24)
shutdown
exit
No18-Nov-2008 12:41:40 %SYSLOG-F-OSFATAL:
FATAL ERROR: STSA: ABORT DATA exception
***** FATAL ERROR *****
SW Version : 1.0.2.23
Version Date: 18-Nov-2008
Version Time: 12:38:16
Instruction 0x4D98F8
Exception vector 0x10
Program state register 0x60000013
***************** SYSTEM RESET *****************

Hi,
"It would be nice of you if you can point me something where LLDP is officialy supported."
The new Sx300 series switches support LLDP and as of the new firmware release (approx release May/June 2011) it will also support Textview (CLI) like the SPS switches amongst other features like CDP and Smartports.
For an overview of the Sx300 series switches, please visit the page below :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps10898/qa_c67-618260.html
Does this seem like a switch that can meet up to your requirements ? Please feel free if you would have any additional questions.
Best regards,
Nico Muselle
Sr. Network Engineer - CCNA
Cisco Sofia STAC

How to get info over snmp on cisco switch whether native vlan on a port is tagged or not?

Hi!
I want to know which oid(s) should I query to know whether native vlan on trunk port on cisco switch is tagged or not?
I am querying the oid .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.46.1.6.3.0 (vlanTrunkPortsDot1qTag) on cisco 3560 (E Series) and I am getting global value. Also, this OID is showing as deprecated. So I query .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.246.1.6 (cltcDot1qAllTagged) and its subtree, but no value is returned.
Switch Version is
Cisco IOS Software, C3560E Software (C3560E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(50)SE2

Keep in mind that DHCP is a broadcast packet to start. So the AP can only listen in the subnet that it has an IP address for.
Now, for any other subnet you can use the AP for DHCP but you have to have an IP helper address on your L3 pointing back to the AP.
That being said, I wouldn't use the DHCP server on the AP as it is limited. You'd be better off using a Microsoft server or some other device that is designed for DHCP.
HTH,
Steve

Lost Packets in certain customer VLANs Trunked over ME

I work for a service provider that configures CPE networks for our customers. We have one customer that we are setting up a Disaster Recovery site over Metro Ethernet. The customers servers need L2 connectivity to the data center for redundancy. The customer wants their VLANs on their 4510 mirrored on a 3750 at the DR site. A gigabit ME VLAN was setup through our ME network between the 2 sites. The 3750 and 4510 were staged at the customer site and tested before the 3750 was moved to the remote DR site and connected by ME.
The 3750 and 4510 were directly connected on a dot1q trunk between the two switches. About 18 vlans are trunked between the 2 switches, about 15 of which have L3 Vlan interfaces configured.
The issue we are having is that packets are getting dropped, on certain customer vlans, but not others. All Vlans worked properly when the 3750 was directly connected to the 4510 at the datacenter.
Our network engineers in charge of the ME noticed MAC-Flap errors on ME switches at the Data Center and the DR site. It see the Mac Address of Interface Vlan 101 and Interface Vlan 318 of the 3750 switch on both the customer access port on both ME 3400 switches (uni) and the ME trunk ports (nni). No other vlans are having issues with lost packets, or connectivity.
On ME 3400 switch uni tunnel port is vlan 459. Native vlan is 540 on 3400 and is the switch mgt vlan.
Has anyone run into this before?

I think commonsense101 means the "Customer Agreement" and the following passage in particular.
"Where and How Does Verizon Wireless Service Work?
Wireless devices use radio transmissions, so unfortunately you can't get Service if your device isn't in range of a transmission signal. And please be aware that even within your Coverage Area, many things can affect the availability and quality of your Service, including network capacity, your device, terrain, buildings, foliage and weather."

Waas without subinterfaces vlans on router

Hi my name is Ivan:
I have a wave 274, wae 674 and wave 574, and i would like to deploy the WAAS in this way:
Cisco wae central manager and wae core attached in the switch core 3750 in stack ( WS-C3750G-24TS-S1U and WS-C3750G-12S-S) with IOS
c3750-ipbase-mz.122-35.SE5.bin. But i want to configuring like it:
Switch Core Stack
int gig 0/x
description Link SwitchCore>>WAECentralManager
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 100
int gig 0/y
description Link SwitchCore>>WAECore
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 200
int gig 0/z
description Link SwitchCore>>RouterWAN
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 300
int vlan 100
description VlanWAECentralManager
ip wccp 61 redirect in
ip add 10.0.41.1 255.255.255.0
int vlan 200
description VlanWAECore
ip wccp redirect excluded inn
ip add 10.0.42.1 255.255.255.0
int vlan 300
descripton VlanRouterWAN
ip add 10.0.43.1 255.255.255.0
int vlan 400
description VLan ServerFarm
ip wccp 61 redirect in
ip add 10.0.44.1 255.255.255.0
Config Router WAN
Int gig 0/a
description Link WAN
ip add 190.41.227.26 255.255.255.248.0
ip wccp 62 redirect out
int gig 0/b
description Link LAN
ip add 10.0.44.2 255.255.255.0
My question is: Is OK this configuration or there is something wrong?
Please could you help me
Regards
Ivan

hi,
as i wrote in my previous post, i'm using pfsense as software appliance on an intel-based server with one internal nic and extended by a 4-port nic. internal nic is WAN, 2 ports of the extended nic are LAN and DMZ.
in my opinion my problem has nothing to do with inter-vlan connectivity. i've forgotten to say, that servers have 2 nics inside, one belonging to DMZ, the other to LAN. but if a request from WAN belongs to a public ip (DMZ), the router forwards to DMZ vlan on the switch, and the switch to the DMZ nic of the server. in my opinion the response should go the other way round, but obviously it's not.
if i do a traceroute from an internal server's public ip nic to an other's LAN nic, it goes over the router. so vlan's are seeming to be ok. so what way a request to a public ip can be responded over the LAN uplink of the switch?!

PortChannel in Cisco ASA with subinterface vlan

Dear Cisco Expert,
I have problem with portchannel in cisco ASA with subinterface, My asa create port channel two link with switch :
my asa configuration (PO3 == int gi0/1 & int gi0/0 ASA) :
interface Port-channel3
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Port-channel3.20
vlan 20
nameif XXXX
security-level 50
ip address 172.27.3.1 255.255.255.224
my switch configuration (PO3 == int gi0/19 & int gi0/20 switch) :
interface Port-channel3
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 20,30,40,50
switchport mode trunk
end
I also tried create int vlan 20 in switch,
interface Vlan20
ip address 172.27.3.2 255.255.255.224
end
but it doesn't work
the etherchannel status is still in waiting :
show etherchannel sum :
3 Po3(SD) LACP Gi0/19(w) Gi0/20(w)
Do you have any clue ?
Thank u guys, ...
Btw, if i create ASA port chanel withoout subinterface it's work.
Best Regards
Rizal Ferdiyan

You ASA cofniguration should look like this. You havnt posted the full config so no comment on that
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
channel-group 10 mode active
speed 1000
duplex full
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
channel-group 10 mode active
speed 1000
duplex full
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Port-channel3
speed 1000
duplex full
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Port-channel3.20
vlan 20
nameif XXXX
security-level 50
ip address 172.27.3.1 255.255.255.224
Thanks
Ajay

Trunking VLAN's over wireless?

Hi,
Is it possible to trunk the wireless connection so that we can put VLAN over the trunk. The VLAN's must be separated so on device in the VLAN 2 may not communicate to the VLAN 5 and vice versa.
Thx,
Marc

Hi, I tought Aironet 1200 and 1100 can do multiple SSID with 1 Vlan per SSID?
I'm trying to connect AP 1200 to 2950-34 in trunk mode with Cat 6506 as the L3 switch in the backbone. I realized that in the trunk mode my laptop can only access 1 IP address. Is this due to long time for convergence due to VLAN and VTP or is it just plain wrong?
Thanks,
Any input is appreciated & please cc to [email protected] .
Cheers,
Ben

VLAN's over Internet/IPSec Tunnel

Hi All !
I have a problem.
I have trunked 5 VLANS from various sites over sattelite and have them all ending on a hub router ,
but my difficulty now is in getting them sent to the HQ over the internet.
I have thought about only 2 ways of possibly being able to do this
1. Get a leased Line :-)
2. and the only feasable alternative ! is to get the VLANs sent per IPSec over the internet but this is my problem....
How do I get a packet from a VLAN into an IPSec tunnel and vice versa ?
What equipment would I need ? (more switches/routers)
Do I need 1 IPSec tunnel for each VLAN to keep them separate from each other ?
Can someone please help.

You have posted this same question on the WAN Routing and Switching forum where it has gotten some responses. I suggest that we consolidate the discussion of this question on that forum.
HTH
Rick

VLAN tags over Pseudowire

I have an existing MPLS Pseudowire connection that I need to rework to be able to carry vlan tags instead of just plain L2 frames.
Existing setup:
ME3400 <-> 7206VXR <-> 7206VXR <-> ME3400
The ME3400's customer facing int tags incoming frames, which go over a trunk interface to a 7206VXR subint. The subint is conf'd for pseudowire p2p to the remote 7206VXR which has an identical setup. Subint on a trunk int to a ME3400, cust facing int tied to a matching vlan.
My thought is use QinQ on the switches, with the question being will the 7206s correctly strip off one vlan tag layer, encapsulate the remaining vlan tagged L2 frame for psuedowire, and on the remote end take the pesuedowire packet, decapsulate it, add on the QinQ tag, and shove it back out to the switch? I won't know ahead of time what vlan tags the customer will be looking to pass, so I need to be able to support whatever they try to throw across this link.

Hi,
You can definitely do that, The pseudowire has 2 labels , the outer label represent the (tunnel label), the inner label represent the (Vc label).
The egress 7206Vxr performs lookup at Vc label and forward the frames un labeled to the ME3400.
On the other hand, with QinQ, the customer vlan access port is tunneled across the Service provider Network, this has no affect in your MPLS Forwarding which done at the vxr7206, The outer vlan tag(tagged by the service provider) is stripped out when the frames forwarded firstly unlabeled to the ME3400 at the egress tunnel interface , the inner vlan tag (customer tag) is forwarded untouched (preserved) to the ingress ME3400 interface.
So, from different point,the MPLS provider is transparent for the Customer Vlan traffic even within the MPLS forwarding LSRs, The Only vlan that is binded to the inner label (Vc label) is the service provider access vlan provided to each customer.
HTH
Mohamed

VLAN data over a DMVPN tunnel to a spoke site

I need to send the VLANS across my DMVPN tunnels to the remote spoke sites. We are routing EIGRP across the tunnels.
Do I have to encapsulate it using L2TP??? If I do ...how do i do that?

bros u VLAN is a layer two and DMVPN is layer three you cant vlan over the WAN except layer 2 WAN like MPLS and ther rest
Posted by WebUser Olatunji Jamiu from Cisco Support Community App

VLAN trunk over Frame Relay

I want to define a VLAN 101 within a branch office on one port of a CAT3524XL, that will in turn go to a router in that branch and be trunked back to the main office router (through a frame relay connection). Once in that main router, I want that one VLAN to specifically be directed to one of the unused ethernet interfaces and in turn to another 3500XL switch for distribution. There are already VLANs in the branch that are connected to the main office, but they all come out on the main branch router's e0/0 interface. I need to make an exception with the new VLAN 101 by forcing all VLAN 101 traffic to be on the e1/1. Please HELP!!!

Yes, my requirement is to be able to direct traffic that originated on that one VLAN to a different port on the central router, where there is a captive portal device which will manage that remote traffic. I may have used the wrong term..."trunk". I really need full visibility and control of that remote VLAN. I have other VLANS (voice, data, management) in the remote branch, and they all come back through the frame. I really need to take this particular VLAN and "point" it to the available interface in the main office. Does that sound feasible with PBR? I will read more on it.
Thanks for the info Rick. Any other ideas or help is appreciated.
Mark

Vlan trunk over wifi

Looking for advice on a problem we have.
We have a building with the WAN link etc. There is a separate building which is connected via a point to point wireless link.
We have Cisco 2960 switches at either end of the wireless link. The switch is divided into 2 vlans one for telephony and one for data. with links in the main building going into a netgear switch.
In the separate building we can access the data vlan but not the voice. The ports connecting to the wireless link are trunked and if I create a vlan in the main building it replicates to the separate building and the ports are a member of the correct VLAN.
I tested with the switches connected directly together and was fine so presuming something related to the wireless link, any thoughts welcome!!
Many thanks

I will assume the following
1. Your data VLAN is the native VLAN on the trunk ports
With that in mind you probably have an MTU issue:
In trunk ports your native VLAN (Default VLAN 1, probably your data VLAN) will not be tagged so MTU=1500,
your voice VLAN will be tagged so MTU > 1500 and your wireless equipment can't handle >1500 MTU so it drops the packets. You can confirm this by changing the native VLAN on your trunk ports to the voice VLAN and see if it works. If that's your case then either change the MTU on your wireless equipment or use 2 wireless links in non trunk ports 1 for each VLAN.
Let me know if it works.

Subinterface VLAN ID over SNMP?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for