Substitution for Interest Block, posting through FB75

Hi,
I have written a substitution according to which FI postings made through FB75 (Customer Credit Memo) must get an Interest block indicator.
This means FI documents posted through FB75 must be excluded from Interest calculation while running Interest calculation program.
The substitution written is as below:
Prerequisite:
BKPF-BUKRS = '1000' AND
BKPF-BLART = 'DG' AND
SYST-TCODE = 'FB75'
Substitutions:
Interest block         Constant value    A
But, this substitution is not working properly. After saving this substitution when I try to post an FI document through FB75, document type DG (Customer Credit Memo), the interest block is not substituted.
Please help me with this.
Regards
Rahul

Hi Friends,
Anybody has any clue on my query?
Regards
Rahul

Similar Messages

  • Configuring double invoice check for vendor invoices posted through FB60

    Dear all
    Can anyone tell me how to configure double invoice check for vendor invoices posted through FB60.
    for miro documents..we can use Tcode OMRDC
    Is there any such tcode which can be used for configuring fi invoices for double checking..
    regards
    Expertia

    Dear Expertia,
    In FI,when checking for duplicated invoices, the system compares the
    following :Vendor, currency, company code, gross amount of the invoice,
    reference document number and Invoice document date.
    SAP Note 305201 clarifies this in a more details; please read it.
    The following fields must be identical for Duplicate invoice check
         Company code                              (BUKRS)
         Vendor number                             (LIFNR)
         Currency                                  (WAERS)
         Reference number                          (XBLNR)
         Amount in document currency               (WRBTR)
         Document date                             (BLDAT)
    If the document is having any one of the above filed different then the
    system does not consider it as a duplicate invoice.
    Also It will check duplicate invoice check in vendor master data and
    in posting key is there check box selected for sales related
    The setting you making in OMRDC i.e Materials management->Logistics
    Invoice Verification->Incoming Invoice ->Set Check for Duplicate
    Invoices is only valid for MM and not  FI invoices posted via FB60/FB65
    You should check the F1 help on field "Chk double inv." (LFB1-REPRF)
    in the relevant vendor master record (transaction FK03).
    Please also check, that message F5 117 has been set correctly in the
    IMG using this path:
    Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings ->
    Document -> Default Values for Document Processing -> Change Message
    Control for Document Control For Document Processing
    Finally & mainly, go to the relevant posting key is defined as sales
    related in transaction OB41. You have to flag this field if the
    duplicate invoice check should work.
    I hope this helps You.
    mauri

  • Substitution for Payment Block

    Hi
    My requirement is to substitute a payment block when a vendor invoice is posted using
    document types XX and YY in a given company code when the invoice amount is more
    than 10000.
    I have written the substution in GGB1 under Financial Accounting Node under Line
    Item category.
    I have created following under Step 001 :
    Prerequisites :
    BKPF-BUKRS = 'ABC' AND BKPF-BLART = 'XX' OR 'YY'AND BSEG-WRBTR > '10000.00'
    Under Substitution :
    Field Payment Block is substituted by constant value 'C'
    Transport request is also generated.
    But still the document when posted  the payment block field is not substituted
    by the value C.
    Can anyone help me what did I miss in the settings and where to rectify. Also, guide
    me to transport the subsitutions to other client.
    Regards
    Gemini

    Dear,
    Please follow the instructions and hope you will succeed:
    Eter Tcode se16 and enter the table name gb01 - check bseg-ZLSPR is there and the excude is not set it must be empty. if yu see the entry is there with X then create an abap program and type the following to delete the entry:
    delete from gb01 client specified  where boolclass = '009' and
    classtype = 'S' and
    bcltab = 'BSEG' and
    bclfield = 'ZLSPR' and
    bexclude = 'X'.
    then again write another program and type the following:
    DATA GB01WA TYPE GB01.
    gb01wa-boolclass = '009'.
    gb01wa-classtype = 'S'.
    gb01wa-bcltab = 'BSEG'.
    gb01wa-bclfield = 'ZLSPR'.
    gb01wa-bexclude = 'X'.
    INSERT INTO gb01 VALUES gb01wa.
    the one again goto GBB1 and create a substitution as follows: first when when you start to create a sub. then it will ask you to select the filed make sure you find and select the field ZLSPR, then you make conditions for your sub. make sure to transport from the same transaction and the again make sure to activate this sub. and transport both requestes, hope it will solve the problem.

  • There is large time differnce in Outbound IDoc's for Interest Run posting

    Hi Experts,
    When i posting Interest Run (T.code : FINT) i am executing for a range of Customers(For 4500 Customers)
    using Background Job it took nearly 3 days to execute the job in Production and i found that there is
    no Partner Profile in WE20,IDoc's went in Error.Until this its fine.
    The major problem is there are group of 100 idoc's created in no time span and it took 4 hrs time gap to create
    another idoc 100 more idoc's.
    In between these 2 bunch of idoc's another 700 idoc's created for different message types.
    Can you please let me know why there is that much time gap for the same message type for Interest Run.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Sudhakar Reddy Allam.

    Bhishma,
    Just clarrification for you...when you said..
    "R/3 sends an IDOC with IDOC number 100. XI (by default) submits this IDOC to the 3'rd party system with IDOC number 200 (it's own internally generated number)."
    Here Idoc number 100 is outbound idoc from R/2 where as Idoc number 200 is inbound idoc...n they are totally different idocs..not same
    I think there is work around...while mapping data from XI --> 3rd party assign / store outbound idoc in one of the unused field of inbound idoc...and while mapping back use this field to map it back...I think this will work.
    Let us know the result.
    Nilesh

  • BAPI for customer Block/Unblock through transaction code : XD05

    Hi Gurus,
    I want to block/unblock customer sales areas(Transaction code : XD05) through program. Could you please suggest any BAPI for the same. As writing BDC will not be a good choice.
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Bhupender

    Hello Bhupender,
    the best and easies solution is the MASS maintenance transaction as proposed above.
    For the BAPI question, sorry but there is NO BAPI to maintain a customer master data.
    The function module provided by my predecessor, even if it has the perfect look like is definitively not the one to use.
    Despite the name, this FM is designed to support only the maintenance of CONSUMERs.
    Moreover it is not an RFC enabled function module.
    It might work in your case, as the data to maintain is quite simple and limited but you still may face several troubles like NO change documents and change pointers created and/or no synchronisation with TREX, CRM, ...
    There is also a BAPI with a nice name, but in fact it is designed to be used only with SAP Online Store and SAP Product Catalog.
    The only reliable path for investigation is described within [note 384462|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/384462].
    A other path for investigation is the class CMD_EI_API which has been introduced with ECC 2005 (6.00).
    You could wrap method MAINTAIN_BAPI inside of a bapi function module you would have written.
    Otherwise, but still with limited functionality there are some eSOA webservices to find, read, maintain customer master data.
    Hope this helps.
    BR
    Alain

  • BAPI BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_POST for G/L posting through (for T-Code F-02)

    Hi,
    I want to use BAPI 'BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_POST' for G/L account posting (F-02). I need to populate the below fields at item level but i am not sure how to populate these fields at item level because not able to find last two fields in any structure of the BAPI.
    Posting Key:
    Account
    Amount
    Tax Code
    Determine tax base (Checkbox in F-02)
    Please let me know how to populate them and if i am using the wrong BAPI then please provide me the correct one.
    Thanks a lot in adv.
    Regards,
    Sheelesh

    Hi
    You can add fields that you don't have in the interface with EXTENSION. Please, see SAP Note 487722 - Using EXTENSION1 for accounting BAPIs.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo
    Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Dec 15, 2011 6:21 PM

  • User Exit for Idoc being posted through ACC_DOCUMENT

    Hi Experts!!
    We have an inbound interface to post FI document using message type ACC_DOCUMENT. Now, we need to influence the idoc before posting. In detail, we need to change a particular field in the header and then only post it. I tried with EXIT_SAPLF050_008. But that was not being updated. Is this user exit only for a few message types like FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2?
    If yes, which user exits can be used to influence the idoc before posting?
    Kindly help me out.
    Thanks a lot in advance.

    Hi ,
    chk with these  exits:
    SIDOC001 -> fm EXIT_SAPLEDI1_001
    SIDOC002 -> fms
    EXIT_SAPLEDI6_001
    EXIT_SAPLEDI6_002
    EXIT_SAPLEDI6_003
    hope it helps..
    Regards,
    Deeba

  • Transfer posting to block stock through quality notification

    Dear QM Experts,
    I am trying to post the material from unrestricted use to block stock through quality notification type Q2. Following are the details.
    1.     Material is batch managed
    2.     Storage location is managed by warehouse management and has storage bin.
    3.     Material has split valuation
    When I click on link transfer post unrestrictedblock system asks to put storage type and storage bin. Here I enter the appropriate details. When I press enter system throws error message as Enter valuation type as the material has split valuation active. Surprisingly I do not find the option to put this valuation type in Q2 notification screen.
    On the contrary when I try to do 344 movment manually through MB1B system gives pop up to select appropriate valuation type.
    Requirement is movement 344 should happen through quality notification considering above constraints. How the valuation type to be entered in Q2 notification?
    I would be grateful, if someone can throw some light on this.
    Thanking you,
    Anand Rao

    Which valuation category do you use in material master accounting view?
    In my experience..
    Normally a company use the batch management for split valuation and a valuation type should be input automatically by transaction in batch master.
    Therefore when you input a material, plant, batch in notification screen, a valuation type would be selected in background by system.
    Anyway try below..
    At transaction MSC2N you input a valuation type into batch master then try to transafer posting through notification.
    I'm not sure why your batch master does not have a valuation type.
    Regards
    Luke

  • Table for line items of budget document posted through FMBB transaction.

    HI,
    I am looking for Table of line items of budget document posted through FMBB transaction.
    There is table FMBL but it is breaking the amount into 12 parts.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    check the tables
    FMBDA   
    FMBDP   
    FMBDT   
    FMBH
    BPDK
    Regards
    Anji

  • Block posting for Obsolete Materials in COPA

    Hey All
    We ahve a ascenario in which we post some expenses to the materials via FI transactions FB50. Nothing hits the stock accounts in these transactions. Only thing is while posting we assign the Materials to the PA segment so that we can run reports in COPA for the materials
    Now some materials have been discontinued and the material plant status have been set to NOT to perform any transaction related to supply chain. BUT when posting through above FB50 trasnaction the system does stop it from posting and derivation for the obsolete material. I have even tried setting the deletion flag in MM06 for the material. Is there any solution to this so that we can stop material from posting
    Thanks
    Ankur

    Hi
    In my opinion, you need to use exit COPA0002 and put a check.. I dont think its possible in standard system
    Another way is to change the description of these materials and add Text " DO NOT USE" so that users are aware while using it
    br, Ajay M

  • Error in posting contract for interest rate futures with product type 70B

    Hi All,
    I am getting the below error while creating contract(FTR_CREATE) for interest rate futures with product type 70B.
    Processing leads to inconsistent positions for 11.02.2014  CoCd:LT01 ValArea:001 ValCls:0001  IDNo:IRF021 Fut.Act:CITI001
    Message no. TPM_TRL063
    Diagnosis
    An error exists in the derived flows. Further processing would lead to inconsistent positions for 11.02.2014 .
    CoCd:LT01 ValArea:001 ValCls:0001  IDNo:IRF021 Fut.Act:CITI001
    System Response
    Processing was terminated.
    Kindly Suggest.
    Regards,
    Anish

    Thank u for ur response.Now it is solved when OB40 and OBCN maintained.Here I am facing a new problem.pl. provide the solution.we configured twoseperate  pricing procedures for our product and scrap material.We have configured same condition types for VAT(ie.condition type:ZVAT) and CST(cond type:ZCST), in both pricing procedures. Now We want to maintain  seperate condition types for VAT and CST for pricing procedure for Product material and Scrap material. I have created two new condition types for scrap sales ZSCT- cst for scrap and ZSVT-vat for scrap by copying the same from existing conditions ZCST & ZVAT, and the same is included in the scrap pricing procedure. And also maintained OB40,OBCN,OVK1,OVK3,OVK4, FTXP,FV11 and VK11.
    now I am facing the following problems.
    1. while creating the Material master & customer master, in tax category sub screen all conditions i.e. conditions defined for  product material( ZCST,ZVAT) and defined for scrap material (ZSCT, ZSVT) displaying and these are compulsory fields.
    2. While creating the sale order for scrap material, system is considering the TAX classes from ZVAT/ ZCST (defined for product material) and taking the condition value from the condition type ZSVT/ ZSCT with the TAX class values of  ZVAT/ZCST.
    Now I would like to know is there any procedure  to assign the Material type and Customer group to Tax category.
    Thanks & Regards
    sam

  • Disk Utility: for bad blocks on hard disks, are seven overwrites any more effective than a single pass of zeros?

    In this topic I'm not interested in security or data remanence (for such things we can turn to e.g. Wilders Security Forums).
    I'm interested solely in best practice approaches to dealing with bad blocks on hard disks.
    I read potentially conflicting information. Examples:
    … 7-way write (not just zero all, it does NOT do a reliable safe job mapping out bad blocks) …
    — https://discussions.apple.com/message/8191915#8191915 (2008-09-29)
    … In theory zero all might find weak or bad blocks but there are better tools …
    — https://discussions.apple.com/message/11199777#11199777 (2010-03-09)
    … substitution will happen on the first re-write with Zeroes. More passes just takes longer.
    — https://discussions.apple.com/message/12414270#12414270 (2010-10-12)
    For bad block purposes alone I can't imagine seven overwrites being any more effective than a single pass of zeros.
    Please, can anyone elaborate?
    Anecdotally, I did find that a Disk Utility single pass of zeros seemed to make good (good enough for a particular purpose) a disk that was previously unreliable (a disk drive that had been dropped).

    @MrHoffman
    As well pointed your answers are, you are not answering the original question, and regarding consumer device hard drives your answers are missleading.
    Consumer device hard drives ONLY remap a bad sector on write. That means regardless how many spare capacity the drive has, it will NEVER remap the sector. That means you ALWAYS have a bad file containing a bad sector.
    In other words YOU would throw away an otherwise fully functional drive. That might be reasonable in a big enterprise where it is cheaper to replace the drive and let the RAID system take care of it.
    However on an iMac or MacBook (Pro) an ordinary user can not replace the drive himself, so on top of the drive costs he has to pay the repair bill (for a drive that likely STILL is in perfect shape, except for the one 'not yet' remaped bad block)
    You simply miss the point that the drive can have still one million good reserve blocks, but will never remap the affected block in a particular email or particular song or particular calendar. So as soon as the file affected is READ the machine hangs, all other processes more or less hang at the same moment they try to perform I/O because the process trying to read the bad block is blocking in the kernal. This happens regardless how many free reserve blocks you have, as the bad block never gets reallocated, unless it is written to it. And your email program wont rewrite an email that is 4 years old for you ... because it is not programmed to realize a certain file needs to be rewritten to get rid of a bad block.
    @Graham Perrin
    You are similar stubborn in not realizing that your original question is awnsered.
    A bad block gets remapped on write.
    So obviously it happens at the first write.
    How do you come to the strange idea that writing several times makes a difference? How do you come to the strange idea that the bytes you write make a difference? Suppose block 1234 is bad. And the blocks 100,000,000 to 100,000,999 are reserve blocks. When you write '********' to block 1234 the hard drive (firmware) will remap it to e.g. 100,000,101. All subsequent writes will go to the same NEW block. So why do you ask if doing it several times will 'improve' this? After all the awnsers here you should have realized: your question makes no sense as soon as you have understood how remapping works (is supposed to work). And no: it does not matter if you write a sequence od zeros, of '0's or of '1's or of 1s or of your social security number or just 'help me I'm hold prisoner in a software forum'.
    I would try to find a software that finds which file is affected, then try to read the bad block until you in fact have read it (that works surprisngly often but may take any time from a few mins to hours) ... in other words you need a software that tries to read the file and copies it completely, so even the bad block is read (hopefully) successful. Then write the whole data to a new file and delete the old one (deleting will free the bad block and ar some later time something will be written there and cause a remap).
    Writing zeros into the bad block basically only helps if you don't care that the affected file is corrupted afterwards. E.g. in case of a movie the player might crash after trying to display the affected area. E.g. if you know the affected file is a text file, it would make more sense to write a bunch of '-' signs, as they are readable while zero bytes are not (a text file is not supposed to contain zero bytes)
    Hope that helped ;)

  • Profit Center Substitution for Migrated line item

    Dear Expert,
    we migrated the data on feb 2014. past records having the default profit center value in each line item, after the migration we are not using the default profit center , we blocked that through some validation, but some situation, for clearing vendor or customer or gl, the migrated line item having default profit
    center with disabled mode to change. so its throwing the validation error, we cant able to unblock the validation also. we need to write a substitution for this to replace automatically . Eg :
    Default Profit center is : 38000
    it should be replace with to 2038100001
    like wise we have multiple company codes.
    i try to write the prerequisite, herewith i have attached the screen shot, i am getting the error for this, anyone can explain this situation ?
    Regards
    Prince

    Hi
    Please, check these notes
    SAP Note 173798 - User exit for PCA substitution
    SAP Note 1532865 - FAQ: Profit center in the billing document
    SAP Note 150959 - Profit center is incorrect in production order
    SAP Note 530578 - Special stocks in PCA
    SAP Note 594507 - PC with valuated special stock incorrect
    and related notes
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Substitution for FB60

    Hi.
    I want to put the Substitution for FB60.
    We have fi,co and hr modules.
    our requirement is 'automatic picking of the COST CENTER when EMPLOYEE CODE is input while booking the vocher in fi through FB60.
    I know that it shouls do through OBBH t.code. Can anybody please let me know how i can do that?
    It's really very urgent and i would be really thankful to you.
    Your help will be really appreciate.
    Thanks,
    Eswar

    Have you checked note 842318?
    also check this thread, which i've posted some time back
    Re: Exit in f-26 or f-28

  • Invoices posted through MIRO

    Hello All
    Does anyone know which table the documents posted through MIRO are held in?. I am particulery interested in the payment block flag. I have an invoice where it differs from the finance document
    I have already check tables BSIK and BSAK
    Thanks
    Prakash

    Hi Prakash,
    The Accounting document of the invoice created thru MIRO will be saved in BKPF and BSEG.
    AS

Maybe you are looking for