Supported WebLogic JVM

Regarding your document "BEA WebLogic Server Platform Support," I have a question specific to Solaris 8. Under the column "Supported WebLogic JVM," I notice that WebLogic 6.1 is listed as supporting only the SunSoft SDK 1.3.1 Java 2 Runtime Environment with Java HotSpot Client VM. Does this mean that if I am currently running 1.3.1_01 with the Java HotSpot Server VM, I need to downgrade to 1.3.1 and switch to client VM to be supported?
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/platforms/index.html#solaris8
Blayne

Hi again.
One further note - sp2 is required for WLS 6.1.
Michael
Michael Young wrote:
Hi.
JDK 1.3.1_01 was recently certified - our platform docs have not yet caught up. The following is the supported config:
SunSoft SDK 1.3.1_01 JavaTM 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_01), Java HotSpotTM Client VM (build 1.3.1_01, mixed mode)
Note that you should use the Client VM, not the Server VM.
Regards,
Michael
Blayne Cook wrote:
Regarding your document "BEA WebLogic Server Platform Support," I have a question specific to Solaris 8. Under the column "Supported WebLogic JVM," I notice that WebLogic 6.1 is listed as supporting only the SunSoft SDK 1.3.1 Java 2 Runtime Environment with Java HotSpot Client VM. Does this mean that if I am currently running 1.3.1_01 with the Java HotSpot Server VM, I need to downgrade to 1.3.1 and switch to client VM to be supported?
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/platforms/index.html#solaris8
Blayne--
Michael Young
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support--
Michael Young
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support

Similar Messages

Super 10.50 - a J2EE toolkit supporting Weblogic 10

Acelet has released Super 10.50, supporting Weblogic 10, with
Easy EJB, Easy JMS, Easy JMX, Easy Webservice and more: at
http://www.acelet.com
Thanks.

Acelet has released Super 10.50, supporting Weblogic 10, with
Easy EJB, Easy JMS, Easy JMX, Easy Webservice and more: at
http://www.acelet.com
Thanks.

Website use Java but not support Microsoft JVM

This website (www.esdlife.com.hk) only support Microsoft JVM but not Sun JAVA JVM, I can't logon into their service pages until I disable my Sun JVM or unless I use another computer it has Microsoft JVM installed. Those pages even don't let me use other web browser like Netscape except Internet Explorer. I am an amateur Java programmer and I have been studying Java for three years. I don't know if this is an issue to the future of Java Technology. This website supported by the Hong Kong government I believe. Could anyone response my question?
Thanks in advance!
Peter
[email protected]

What has probably happened is that the site you are talking about wrote thier page with Microsoft Java, which isn't really Java. They probably used some class, or number of classes, that is specific to the Microsoft VM. This is not a problem with Java, it is a problem with Microsoft makeing their Java uncompatible with Java.

Support for JVM 1.3.1 in Weblogic 5.1

I need to switch from JVM 1.3.0 that is in Weblogic 5.1 to JVM 1.3.1 without upgrading
to Weblogic 6.1. Any suggestions?

1.3.1 is supported on most platforms according to the page, for example 5.1
on Win 2000. 1.3.1 is not listed with NT and 5.1, but we've run it ok. BEA
probably doesn't have time to certify all combinations, so I'm guessing
they've prioritized what they think are the important ones. Some others
that seem similar (like this example) probably work just fine, though test
them thoroughly yourself if you have doubt.
http://www.weblogic.com/platforms/index.html#win2000AS
"Kumar Allamraju" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
WLS 51 supports JDK 1.3.0
check our platform support page
http://www.weblogic.com/platforms/index.html#winnt
Kumar
"scott humphreys" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3c97695c$[email protected]..
I need to switch from JVM 1.3.0 that is in Weblogic 5.1 to JVM 1.3.1without upgrading
to Weblogic 6.1. Any suggestions?

Supported Server JVM

At the following location BEA is telling which JVM version is supported for a given
Version of WLS (WLS 7.0 SP4):
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/certifications/certs_700/sun_solaris9.html#sp4
I would like to know what this comment means:
WebLogic 7.0 SP4 was certified with SunSoft SDK 1.3.1_08 and will support any
service pack of SunSoft SDK 1.3.1 higher than SDK 1.3.1_08.
Does it means that for example SDK 1.3.1_09 is supported, or do I miss anderstand
this comment?
Thanks for any hints

Below is the edocs link which has information on JRockit JDK
http://edocs.bea.com/jrockit/webdocs/interm/pdf.html
Below Link has some useful information on 32-bit vs 64-bit JDK.
http://benjchristensen.wordpress.com/2007/02/16/32-bit-versus-64-bit-jdk-memory-usage/
Hope this helps.
- - Tarun

Encoding Problem from Webservice to Weblogic JVM 10.0 to Database

Hi,
I feel we have issue with encoding. We have a value "TESTTESTTEST -TESTÇAO TESTTEST", Clients inject a message with UTF-8 format with this value to our Weblogic servers and these jvm does some businness validation and inserts in to database. In DB the table column is 30 varchar and manually I am able to update the table with this value, but when weblogic is inserting this value we are getting error saying "value too large error to insert TESTTESTTEST -TESTÃ‡AO TESTTEST"
here the special char is changing, I have seen in Weblogic config file the encoding is set to UTF-8 format.
please let me know if u have any idea and issue had similar and how it resolved..
Is this problem is bcoz of jdbc drivers
thanks.
Edited by: Shaik on 16-May-2011 19:05

Specify the encoding param in weblogic.xml.
<weblogic-web-app>
<jsp-descriptor>
<jsp-param>
<param-name>encoding</param-name>
<param-value>UTF-8</param-value>
</jsp-param>
</jsp-descriptor>
</weblogic-web-app>
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/webapp/weblogic_xml.html

OutOfMemory error in Weblogic jvm even when enough heap is still available

Hi Everyone,
We get a strange OutOfMemory error that happens only once in our Weblogic server in production environment.The Server immediately recovers and there is no issue as far as the application functionality is concerned.
This is the exact error as seen in weblogic console.log file :
caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
I enabled the verbose gc logging too with the jvm parameter "-XX:+PrintHeapAtGC".Am copying the gc.log file excerpt when we got the Out of Memory issue in console.log.
gc.log when error was seen in console.log:
172047.050: [GC {Heap before gc invocations=28392:
par new generation   total 49088K, used 49024K [0xb8000000, 0xbb000000, 0xbb000000)
eden space 49024K, 100% used [0xb8000000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000)
from space 64K,   0% used [0xbaff0000, 0xbaff0000, 0xbb000000)
to   space 64K,   0% used [0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbaff0000)
concurrent mark-sweep generation total 737280K, used 364191K [0xbb000000, 0xe8000000, 0xe8000000)
concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 262144K, used 166556K [0xe8000000, 0xf8000000, 0xf8000000)
172047.050: [ParNew: 49024K->0K(49088K), 0.1014386 secs] 413215K->382087K(786368K)Heap after gc invocations=28393:
par new generation total 49088K, used 0K [0xb8000000, 0xbb000000, 0xbb000000)
eden space 49024K, 0% used [0xb8000000, 0xb8000000, 0xbafe0000)
from space 64K, 0% used [0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbaff0000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xbaff0000, 0xbaff0000, 0xbb000000)
concurrent mark-sweep generation total 737280K, used 382087K [0xbb000000, 0xe8000000, 0xe8000000)
concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 262144K, used 166556K [0xe8000000, 0xf8000000, 0xf8000000)
, 0.1021810 secs]
172055.735: [GC {Heap before gc invocations=28393:
par new generation   total 49088K, used 49008K [0xb8000000, 0xbb000000, 0xbb000000)
eden space 49024K, 99% used [0xb8000000, 0xbafdc128, 0xbafe0000)
from space 64K,   0% used [0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbaff0000)
to   space 64K,   0% used [0xbaff0000, 0xbaff0000, 0xbb000000)
concurrent mark-sweep generation total 737280K, used 382087K [0xbb000000, 0xe8000000, 0xe8000000)
concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 262144K, used 166616K [0xe8000000, 0xf8000000, 0xf8000000)
172055.735: [ParNew: 49008K->0K(49088K), 0.0536844 secs] 431095K->387656K(786368K)Heap after gc invocations=28394:
par new generation total 49088K, used 0K [0xb8000000, 0xbb000000, 0xbb000000)
eden space 49024K, 0% used [0xb8000000, 0xb8000000, 0xbafe0000)
from space 64K, 0% used [0xbaff0000, 0xbaff0000, 0xbb000000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbaff0000)
concurrent mark-sweep generation total 737280K, used 387656K [0xbb000000, 0xe8000000, 0xe8000000)
concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 262144K, used 166616K [0xe8000000, 0xf8000000, 0xf8000000)
, 0.0544288 secs]
172059.106: [Full GC {Heap before gc invocations=28394:
par new generation   total 49088K, used 22668K [0xb8000000, 0xbb000000, 0xbb000000)
eden space 49024K, 46% used [0xb8000000, 0xb9623158, 0xbafe0000)
from space 64K,   0% used [0xbaff0000, 0xbaff0000, 0xbb000000)
to   space 64K,   0% used [0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbaff0000)
concurrent mark-sweep generation total 737280K, used 387656K [0xbb000000, 0xe8000000, 0xe8000000)
concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 262144K, used 166616K [0xe8000000, 0xf8000000, 0xf8000000)
172059.106: [CMS: 387656K->335512K(737280K), 6.1797673 secs] 410325K->335512K(786368K), [CMS Perm : 166616K->166119K(262144K)]Heap after gc invocations=28395:
par new generation total 49088K, used 0K [0xb8000000, 0xbb000000, 0xbb000000)
eden space 49024K, 0% used [0xb8000000, 0xb8000000, 0xbafe0000)
from space 64K, 0% used [0xbaff0000, 0xbaff0000, 0xbb000000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbaff0000)
concurrent mark-sweep generation total 737280K, used 335512K [0xbb000000, 0xe8000000, 0xe8000000)
concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 262144K, used 166119K [0xe8000000, 0xf8000000, 0xf8000000)
, 6.1804623 secs]
172073.913: [GC {Heap before gc invocations=28395:
par new generation   total 49088K, used 49024K [0xb8000000, 0xbb000000, 0xbb000000)
eden space 49024K, 100% used [0xb8000000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000)
from space 64K,   0% used [0xbaff0000, 0xbaff0000, 0xbb000000)
to   space 64K,   0% used [0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbaff0000)
concurrent mark-sweep generation total 737280K, used 335512K [0xbb000000, 0xe8000000, 0xe8000000)
concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 262144K, used 166146K [0xe8000000, 0xf8000000, 0xf8000000)
172073.913: [ParNew: 49024K->0K(49088K), 0.0616737 secs] 384536K->341716K(786368K)Heap after gc invocations=28396:
par new generation total 49088K, used 0K [0xb8000000, 0xbb000000, 0xbb000000)
eden space 49024K, 0% used [0xb8000000, 0xb8000000, 0xbafe0000)
from space 64K, 0% used [0xbafe0000, 0xbafe0000, 0xbaff0000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xbaff0000, 0xbaff0000, 0xbb000000)
concurrent mark-sweep generation total 737280K, used 341716K [0xbb000000, 0xe8000000, 0xe8000000)
concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 262144K, used 166146K [0xe8000000, 0xf8000000, 0xf8000000)
, 0.0623851 secs]
I read at some forums that Heap fragmentation could be the reason when you get the OutOfMemory error?Also the rate with which GC is running if it consumes more than 98% of time and releases less than 2% of heap,this error could be thrown.
Could any of the above be a cause for this?We dont have the flexibilty of increasing the Xmx anymore.
We are using a Concurrent Mark Sweep collector as can be seen from script below.
Here are the jvm parameters am using in Server start script:
JAVA_HOME/bin/java -server -Xms768m -Xmx768m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:MaxNewSize=64m -Xbootclasspath/a:$BOOTCLASSPATH -classpath $CLASSPATH -Dbea.home=$BEA_HOME -Dweblogic.Domain=$DOMAIN_NAME -Dweblogic.Name=$SERVER_NAME -Djava.security.auth.login.config=../properties/login.config -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=7003 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -XX:+UsePerfData -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -Xloggc:../log/gc.log -Djava.security.policy==$WL_HOME/lib/weblogic.policy -Dweblogic.ProductionModeEnabled=true -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled -XX:+CMSPermGenSweepingEnabled -Dweblogic.management.discover=false -XX:-TraceClassUnloading -Dweblogic.management.server=scc-prd-admin.XXX.com:7001 weblogic.Server
We are using jdk1.5.0_06 version of java with Weblogic.
Could someone please help resolve this issue?Any thoughts?

Are you using RMI? Have you adjusted sun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval and sun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval from their default values for calling System.gc()? I gather (from the format of your logs) that you are running an older JVM, where the default RMI GC intervals were 60000 milliseconds (1 minute). In later JVM's, the default RMI GC interval was increased to 1 hour. See the [JavaTM RMI Release Notes for JDK 6|http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/rmi/relnotes.html] for some details on this.
Otherwise you might be using some third party code that calls System.gc() periodically. A later JVM will show "(System)" in the full GC output for collections that were caused by a call to System.gc(). You can effectively disable that behavior with the -XX:+DisableExplicitGC command line option, though that might have bad effects on your application if the third party code needed those full collections. But it would be diagnostic.

Crystal rpeort java(crj) not support weblogic 10.3.6 jdk1.6

Hi,
My system use weblogic 10.0 jdk1.5 with crystal report java (crjava-runtime_12.2.217) is work find, but we want to upgrade server to weblogic 10.3.6.
In the crystal report java (crjava-runtime_12.2.217) document say weblogic 10.3.6 only support 1.5.0_04.
I install jdk1.5 with weblogic 10.3.6 the server can't started success, it well say bad version for .class.
I can't accept is any brand application server have support jdk1.6.
Only Weblogic not support jdk1.6(Tomcat support 1.6 and is free).
Someone can help me to finish server upgrade?
Thank you very much.
crystal report java (crjava-runtime_12.2.217) support document：
Web Application Servers
JDK Support
===========================================================
* JBoss 4.2
1.5
* JBoss 5
1.5
* JBoss 7.1
1.6
* Oracle Application Server 10g R3 (10.1.3)
1.5.05
* SAP Web Application Server 7.1
1.5
* SAP Web Application Server 7.31 SP4
1.6
* SAP Web Application Server 7.40
1.6
* Tomcat 5.5
1.5.0_x
* Tomcat 6.0
1.5+/1.6
* Tomcat 7.0.25
1.6
* WebLogic 9.2
1.5.0_04
* WebLogic 10.2
1.5.0_04
* WebLogic 10.3
1.5.0_04
* WebSphere 6.1
1.
* WebSphere 7.0
1.5
* WebSphere 8.5
1.6

Hi,
The standalone weblogic 10.3.6 does support jdk 1.6 and not jdk1.5
if crystal report works only with wls 10.3.6 with jdk 1.5, then you need to check if there is any other version of crystal report that can be used with wls 10.3.6 + jdk 1.6
Thanks,
Sharmela

Can Jdeveloper support Weblogic Application Server Deploy ??

Can Jdeveloper support the Weblogic application server deploy in EJB part ?

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Michael Cheng ([email protected]):
Can Jdeveloper support the Weblogic application server deploy in EJB part ?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes.
null

Coherence Mbeans doesnt support weblogic standard

Hi,
According to weblogic standard, the mbeans should be called:
domain:Name=name,Type=type[,Location=serverName][,TypeOfParentMBean=NameOfParentMBean][,TypeOfParentMBean1=NameOfParentMBean1]...
The Mbeans I looked at use the type attribute instead of Type.
The code I use queries the server using "Type" and therefore I dont get as a result any of the coherence mbeans, just the weblogic ones.
What can I do about it? (the code is already deployed on mulitple customer sites)
Also, when I use the connection to query all mbeans for example:
mbeanServerConnection.queryNames(null, null);
I dont get back the coherence mbeans. is that because of the same problem?

Hi,
Have you tried using an MBean Notification Listener? You can register for MBean events on MBeans that provide notifications. In this case we want to know when a Coherence MBean is regaitered so we can access it so you can listen to events on the JVM's own JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate MBean. Among other things, this MBean fires an event each time an MBean is registered.
Here is an example
final MBeanServer mBeanServer = ManagementFactory.getPlatformMBeanServer();
NotificationFilter filter = new NotificationFilter() {
    @Override
    public boolean isNotificationEnabled(Notification notification) {
        return "JMX.mbean.registered".equals(notification.getType());
NotificationListener listener = new NotificationListener() {
    @Override
    public void handleNotification(Notification notification, Object handback) {
        try {
            ObjectName mBeanName = ((MBeanServerNotification) notification).getMBeanName();
            if ("Node".equals(mBeanName.getKeyProperty("type"))) {
                System.out.println("Node MBean registered " + mBeanName);
                Integer member = (Integer) mBeanServer.getAttribute(mBeanName, "Id");
                System.out.println("Node Member ID = " + member);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
mBeanServer.addNotificationListener(new ObjectName("JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate"), listener, filter, null);In the code above we create a NotificationFilter that will only pass MBean registration events. We create a listener that looks for MBean registrations where the "type" attribute of the MBean's ObjectName is "Node", i.e. we have a Coherence Node MBean registration. The listener then gets the Nodes member Id and prints it. You should be able to figure out from that how to do other things.
JK

What features of Workshop 8.1 are supported Weblogic Express 8.1?

I wish to find a URL or any information that explicitly states which
features of Workshop 8.1 are supported in Weblogic Express 8.1. I
understand that Express does not support EJBs and that some of Workshop's
Controls are implemented using EJBs. I would assume that those Controls
would not be supported in Express. Can any of the Controls be used when the
targeted machine is configured with Express?

In 8.1 all workshop controls rely on the EJB container, and thus none of
them work on Express. Using the pageflow portability kit, pageflows without
controls can be used on WLX -- they are just struts extensions. We'll be
relaxing the reliance of controls on the EJB container in the next major
release.
-George Snelling
Product Manager, Workshop
"Denis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:403d0341$[email protected]..
I wish to find a URL or any information that explicitly states which
features of Workshop 8.1 are supported in Weblogic Express 8.1. I
understand that Express does not support EJBs and that some of Workshop's
Controls are implemented using EJBs. I would assume that those Controls
would not be supported in Express. Can any of the Controls be used whenthe
targeted machine is configured with Express?

Covariant return types - JLS to support but JVM will not?

Could you please confirm the following? My understanding is that covariant return types will be supported by the JLS but the JVM will know nothing about them. That is, the invokevirtual instruction will not change to support covariant return types but rather the compiler will use bridge methods to simulate support. Is this correct?

Right: but is there support for this in 1.5?
javac -verbose -source 1.5 -target 1.5 *java
was run on a .java file with the following methods and it failed "getX already defined"
public Integer getX() {
return(null);
public String getX() {
return(null);
The above would be overloading by return type and fails to compile.
================
class A {
Exception f() {}
class B extends A {
BindException f() {} // overload or override?
The above would be covariant returns and works just fine right?

Weblogic JVM usage

Is there a limit on the amount of ram that the server jvm can use?

This is largely a function of the VM implementation. You should check with
the VM documentation, it used to be around a gig heap on Solaris, but again
this changes with each new release.
Cheers
mbg
"Ron" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3ef71367$[email protected]..
>
Is there a limit on the amount of ram that the server jvm can use?

Native thread support in JVM.

Hello,
I would like to know if which version of the JRE that supports native threads under Windows 2000. We have Dell 6450 and 8450 boxes which 6 and 8 CPUs respectivly. Are there any performance gains using green threads or native threads in your java apps running on this type of hardware? We are having problems scaling our app across multiple processors, anyone have any suggestions? I have read the articles on performance tuning for GC.
Thanks for you help,
Richie

There are a lot of GC calls. About every 2-3 secs:
[GC 2510K->2018K(2844K), 0.0083897 secs]
[GC 2530K->2066K(2844K), 0.0079910 secs]
[GC 2578K->2081K(2844K), 0.0057756 secs]
[GC 2593K->2086K(2844K), 0.0049079 secs]
[GC 2598K->2109K(2844K), 0.0045131 secs]
[GC 2621K->2111K(2844K), 0.0040606 secs]
[GC 2623K->2116K(2844K), 0.0032259 secs]
[Full GC 2429K->1891K(3732K), 0.1262438 secs]
[GC 2403K->1899K(3732K), 0.0031484 secs]
[GC 2411K->1896K(3732K), 0.0027157 secs]
[Full GC 2290K->1907K(3756K), 0.1177704 secs]
[GC 2419K->1910K(3756K), 0.0027415 secs]
[GC 2422K->1913K(3756K), 0.0027142 secs]
[GC 2425K->1920K(3756K), 0.0029628 secs]
[Full GC 2154K->1776K(3756K), 0.1736008 secs]
[GC 2288K->1779K(3756K), 0.0025489 secs]
[GC 2291K->1780K(3756K), 0.0027452 secs]
[GC 2292K->1791K(3756K), 0.0028704 secs]
[Full GC 2025K->1792K(3756K), 0.1165200 secs]
[GC 2304K->1800K(3756K), 0.0028561 secs]
[GC 2312K->1815K(3756K), 0.0033773 secs]
[Full GC 1877K->1808K(3756K), 0.1168870 secs]
[GC 2320K->1812K(3756K), 0.0026055 secs]
[GC 2324K->1813K(3756K), 0.0027891 secs]
[GC 2325K->1813K(3756K), 0.0030839 secs]
[Full GC 2082K->1824K(3756K), 0.1178141 secs]
[GC 2336K->1832K(3756K), 0.0028492 secs]
[GC 2343K->1831K(3756K), 0.0031900 secs]
[GC 2342K->1839K(3756K), 0.0028541 secs]
[Full GC 2130K->1776K(3756K), 0.1235131 secs]
[GC 2288K->1781K(3756K), 0.0027983 secs]
[GC 2293K->1793K(3756K), 0.0028564 secs]
[Full GC 2090K->1792K(3756K), 0.1179482 secs]
[GC 2304K->1798K(3756K), 0.0027652 secs]
[GC 2310K->1796K(3756K), 0.0031365 secs]
[GC 2308K->1806K(3756K), 0.0028844 secs]
[Full GC 2041K->1808K(3756K), 0.1173085 secs]
[GC 2320K->1815K(3756K), 0.0027971 secs]
After the changes you recommended, all the calls where full GCs but about every minute or so:
[Full GC 29465K->1633K(229376K), 0.1860478 secs]
[Full GC 7693K->1861K(229376K), 0.1346889 secs]
[Full GC 6788K->2378K(229376K), 0.1453195 secs]
[Full GC 4473K->2172K(229376K), 0.1886921 secs]
[Full GC 3425K->2200K(229376K), 0.1256969 secs]
[Full GC 5118K->2228K(229376K), 0.1301106 secs]
[Full GC 4778K->2257K(229376K), 0.1294866 secs]
[Full GC 4864K->2172K(229376K), 0.1394726 secs]
[Full GC 4266K->2200K(229376K), 0.1312010 secs]
[Full GC 4242K->2228K(229376K), 0.1283027 secs]
[Full GC 4391K->2249K(229376K), 0.1281122 secs]
[Full GC 4730K->2163K(229376K), 0.1425039 secs]
[Full GC 3477K->2191K(229376K), 0.1254208 secs]
[Full GC 5201K->2219K(229376K), 0.1340530 secs]
[Full GC 4763K->2246K(229376K), 0.1299836 secs]
[Full GC 4915K->2136K(229376K), 0.1432493 secs]
[Full GC 4116K->2164K(229376K), 0.1287218 secs]
[Full GC 4325K->2194K(229376K), 0.1300299 secs]
[Full GC 4324K->2221K(229376K), 0.1302815 secs]
[Full GC 4802K->2137K(229376K), 0.1434224 secs]
[Full GC 3461K->2165K(229376K), 0.1263876 secs]
[Full GC 5078K->2193K(229376K), 0.1326188 secs]
[Full GC 4795K->2221K(229376K), 0.1319525 secs]
[Full GC 4744K->2137K(229376K), 0.1306481 secs]
None of the calls are very long. So far, so good.

Solaris 10 64 bit and 64 bit JVM support for Weblogic Server 9.1

Does the following configuration supported:
Weblogic Server 9.1
Sun Solaris 10 (64 bit)
Sun JVM 5.0 (64 bit)
I could only find reference to 32 bit JVM on bea site.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks

Hi.
answers inline:
sanjay wrote:
Hi,
Can Weblogic Express (Cluster edition)6.1J sp2 be installed on Sun Solaris(Sparc)
8(64 bit) ?Yes - http://edocs.bea.com/wls/platforms/index.html#solaris8
>
>
Can Weblogic Express (Cluster edition)6.1J sp2 JDBC driver be used for Oracle 8.1.7(Solaris
64 bit) ?
Yes - http://edocs.bea.com/wls/platforms/index.html#jdbc
Michael Young
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support

Supported WebLogic JVM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for