Supressing  Issue based on grouping

Our report has been grouped based on few columns, say(Title, Jobcode, Job Name, Job Description and Status).
The set of output for this group would contain these columns say(Rev No#, Job Comments, effectivedate)
Our requirement is to suppress the column Rev No# for every group.
Ex: For Job Code 101, Rev No# having values 0 and 1, has to be displayed once in the group, again for Job Code 102, it has to display its Rev No# once.
Please look at the sample provided below for the better understanding.
Any help on handling this requirement in BI Publisher ?
Actual Output:
               Report Title
Title: VSM Job Code: 101 Job Name : Carpenter
JobDescription: Status: Active
RevNo# Job Comments EffectiveDate
0 com_lie 10/16/02
0 data_to_conv 10/11/02
0 data_ts 10/14/02
1 visdeliver 10/14/02
1 data_nd 10/14/02
Title: VSN Job Code: 102 Job Name : Carpenter
JobDescription: Status: Active
RevNo# Job Comments EffectiveDate
0 X 10/16/02
     0 Y          10/11/02
1 A      10/14/02
     1     B 10/14/02
1 C 10/14/02
Required Output:
          Report Title
Title: VSM Job Code: 101 Job Name : Carpenter
JobDescription: Status: Active
RevNo# Job Comments EffectiveDate
0 com_live 10/16/02
          data_to_conv 10/11/02
data_ts 10/14/02
1 visdelivered 10/14/02
data_nd 10/14/02
Title: VSN Job Code: 102 Job Name : Carpenter
JobDescription: Status: Active
RevNo# Job Comments EffectiveDate
0 X 10/16/02
          Y     10/11/02
1 A      10/14/02
          B 10/14/02
C 10/14/02

Check the blog http://blogs.oracle.com/xmlpublisher/2007/04/my_duplicates_made_duplicates.html

Similar Messages

  • Setting Default Dashboard based on Groups/users in OBIEE 10g

    Hi,
    I am having a requirement and facing some issues with setting a default dashboard option to the users who ever access the application. Below is the brief description of entire requirement.
    The main requirement is to integrate OBIEE into a .net and silver light application. We will be having a 3 links in the .net application , which in turn displays the OBIEE reports and dashboards upon clicking the 3 links.
    We are using the concept of Init blocks, session variables and Go URL from an OBIEE standpoint for accomplishing this integration requirement. We have also configured LDAP server in OBIEE.
    The issue we are facing is out of the 3 links in .net application, we have one link/icon called dashboard icon which should display bunch of OBIEE dashboard pages in the form of 4 tabs but currently it is showing the My Dashboard home page. For this to achieve to set default dashboard page is to go to My account and change the default dashboard to the desired dashboard and log out and log in back to the application and we will be all set with dashboard pages being displayed upon lcking the dashboard icon but this is manual process for each user as they need to login into the .net application and change the setting s in My Account manually to change the default dashboard setting to the desired one.
    How should I make sure, whoever is logging into the Application (every user) should be able to see the default dashboard pages without changing the options manually by going to My Account.
    The LDAP server is taking care of the Authentication part of the users as every user record is maintained in Active directory which in turn is part of LDAP server.
    To brief high level requirement on single statement is  how to make a default dashboard pages to users based on group in OBIEE. Is there any option in OBIEE, where we can change or set a default dashboard to particular group in OBIEE either in RPD or UI level.
    Appreciate your help on this.
    Let me know if anyone needs any more information in this regard.
    Thank
    Praveen

    You can set 'PORTALPATH'. Have a look at these threads below:
    how to get default dashboards when users logs in
    Re: PORTALPATH for Each Group
    - Bharath

  • Goods Issue based on Goods receipt.

    Hello,
    Can any body suggest query on "Goods Issue based on Goods receipt."
    Scenario :
    Suppose P.O has been created @10/- for 100 Quantity . GR has done for 100/-in Month of June, now another P.O has created @12/-  for 100 Quantity in Month of July  and GR done for the same , I want to Isuue Goods in Month of july and expect system should take price of @10/- for first 100 Quantity and @12/- for the rest quantity.
    Could you advise.?
    Thanks & Regards
    Sudhansu

    Hi,
    For FIFO Configuration,
    1. Ensure FIFO is active tcode OMWE
    2. FIFO maintained at company code or plant level T code: MRLH
    3. Movement type settings for FIFO T code OMW4
    4. Preparation of FIFO in MMR T code: MRF4
    5. Run the FIFO valuation T code MRF1

  • Goods issue based on reservation !

    While performing a goods issue based on a reservation, i can exceed the qty in the reservation, how can i control this so that to prevent the user from posting a goods issue qty more that what in the reservation?
    Thanks
    Ahmed Karam

    hi,
    check the system messages
    go to SE91 check the relavent message, and control the same in system message setting*
    Edited by: Suresh Shenoy on Jan 24, 2008 10:28 AM

  • Report to see Trial balance based on Group account

    Hi Fi Gurus,
    I am trying to see verify my GL balances based on group account no ( Group COA GL). is there a standard report that can help me here?
    Thanks in advance.
    Dasaradh

    Hi,
    "Group Account Number" is available in the dynamic selection in report S_ALR_87012277 in ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0 also.
    When you click on "Dynamic Selection" button, in left hand side double click on "Group Acocunt Number" and then you can enter the values in right hand side for this field. (i.e. after activating the "Group Account Number" in dynamic seleections.)
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Content filters based on Group Best Practice

    What is best practice for Content filters based on Group.
    What we wanna accomplish.
    We have few groups but i'll make an example on two.
    We have one group that have allowed "Media" and another group that have allowed "Exe".
    What is best practice if one user is in both group.
    How would you do Content filtering?
    I dont see in Content filtering condition
    if (Envelope Recipient does not mach group) then Block.
    Is the best way to create first?
    If (attachment.type="Media") then (insert header="sometext);
    and after in Content filter below
    if (Envelope Recipient) and (Header does not contain "sometext") then Block.

    Hi,
    I understand that I will have to use BPM. What is the best way?

  • Calculate Set membership based on Group Membership

    I know this has been asked before, but I haven't really found a clear answer to the problem - so here's me re-igniting the fire!
    I want to calculate set membership based on group membership? So, I have a set called "My Set" - its members should be all the members of the group "My Group" (The group is a Manual group, not a criteria based one). I know that Sets cannot
    refer to Groups when using "Resource ID" - bummer!
    I guess this can be done using a custom action WF which triggers whenever a member is added to the Group and goes and it goes and updates the Set with the ExplicitMember reference, but I'm wondering if there's a more elegant solution using some OOTB activities?
    Thanks

    I've done this using a custom WF, but still curious to see if there is some other way around it.
    For those interested, the custom workflow gets the member being added from the request, and adds it to the set - fairly simple really. I'm using the FIM PowerShell WF activity for this, in conjunction with the fantastic FIM PowerShell Module

  • Portal-based logon Groups?

    Hi,
    I´m working with in a Application Sharing setup and in help.sap related to configuring Application Sharing in a clustered environment it mentions something about a portal-based logon group and a zone separator when just having a stand alone server with more than one server nodes.
    This is found in the following document under ClusterLogonGroupName and ClusterGroupSeparator explanation.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/6d/41e74196d8c517e10000000a155106/content.htm
    I have never heard about logon groups inside SAP Portal and a zone separator, has somebody worked with them? where do you configure them or is this info in help.sap not accurate?
    Kind Regards,
    Gerardo J

    Hi Gerado,
    You define logon groups to determine how client requests to certain applications are load balanced when your system setup uses the SAP Web Dispatcher or a third-party hardware load balancer in front of your application servers. For example, you can define a logon group so that a certain application (such as one with high CPU usage) is accessible only on two instances within your cluster, which are running on machines equipped with extra CPU resources.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/f3/795a421b5ec153e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    Information regarding the zone seperator can be found here:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/56/dcf4c12b072c4e89884dc164b3762c/frameset.htm
    I have not worked with these, but they seem interesting.
    Regards,
    Kai

  • How do I create a query based distibution group in Exchange 2010?

    Hi,
    We have just moved onto exchange 2010 and I wanting to create query based distribution groups based on OU's. As there is now wizard within 2010 I am a little unsure as to how to go about this. I am led to believe I now need a scritp to do this.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    I have tried this and get the following error. Any Ideas?
    Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
    All@Doncaster <mailto:IMCEAEX-_O%3DFIRST%2B20ORGANIZATION_OU%3DEXCHANGE%2B20ADMINISTRATIVE%2B20GROUP%2B20%2B28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT%2B29_CN%3DRECIPIENTS_CN%3DAll%[email protected]>
    The email address that you entered couldn't be found. Check the address and try resending the message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: CRHV03.crhfsg-uk.co.uk
    IMCEAEX-_O=FIRST+20ORGANIZATION_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=[email protected]
    #550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.ExRecipNotFound; not found ##
    Original message headers:
    Received: from CRHV03.crhfsg-uk.co.uk ([fe80::451b:a27f:42cb:f770]) by
     CRHV03.crhfsg-uk.co.uk ([fe80::451b:a27f:42cb:f770%12]) with mapi id
     14.01.0289.001; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:24:50 +0100
    Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    From: "Smith, Stacey" <[email protected]>
    To: "All@Doncaster" <[email protected]>
    Subject: FW: test
    Thread-Topic: test
    Thread-Index: AcxC+SC29u62U+fVRiGEfoRPRWVvRgAAc31g
    Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:24:50 +0100
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    References: <[email protected]>
    In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
    Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
    Content-Language: en-US
    X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
    X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <[email protected]>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    X-Originating-IP: [10.39.1.125]

  • When I issue the 'Force group Settings' command what effect will this have on existing flows? Do I need to disable WCCP prior to issuing this command on the affected WAE's?

    Hi WAAS Experts,
    I have a query, when I issue the 'Force group Settings' command what effect will this have on existing flows? Do I need to disable WCCP prior to issuing this command on the affected WAE's?
    Thanks,
    Shankar K

    Hi Shankar,
    A change of classifier/policy on the WAE is not affecting the existing flows so you shouldn't need to disable WCCP if you want to force group settings there.
    Regards,
    Nicolas

  • Issue with AD group based collection

    Hi,
    We are using AD security group based membership. Also, we are uing the same SCCM infra to cover other domains as well.
    From Activie Direcoty, it could able to discover the machines (computer objects) belongs to other domains but those computer objects not reflecting onto the collections.
    Any suggestions woud help us!
    Many Thanks.

    Check your collection refresh interval also is any machines added to the AD group getting populated ie. from the same domain xxx ? if so, i think you need to add the IP sub-net details on the boundary and
    also  discover the another domain machines using LDAP query for it(ex. sccm discovers and manages xxx domain where as its not discovering yyy domain machines becoz its not discovered ,you can also do it using the IP subnet details ie n/w discovery) the
    machines to the ALL systems then it may get added to the collection.
    Kamala kannan.c| Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” or Vote as Helpful if its helpful for you. |Disclaimer: This posting is provided with no warranties and confers no rights

  • Issue with Delivery Grouping in Sales Order

    Hello Gurus,
    I have a problem in Sales Order (VA01 & VA02). The issue is as follows.
    We have created a material called “FREIGHT” to calculate the Shipping & Handling cost in a Sales Order. This material has no ATP CHECK, so the Material Av. Date (MAD) is determined as immediate or the current date.
    But the business process we want to implement is, the FREIGHT material should not be delivered separately, but should be grouped with one the line items in the sales order which has the earliest material available date and copy the corresponding dates to FREIGHT line item and delivery grouping should be done.
    1. Say 1st line item is a BOM Material, next item is a standalone material (Non-BOM), and 3rd item is FREIGHT material.
    POSNR   Matnr           Qty     DlvGrp  DlvDt  MAD  LoadingDt
    10     BOM (Parent)     1    1   x-date   09/11/2006    x-date
    11     SKU1 (Child)     x        x-date   09/11/2006    x-date
    12     SKU2 (Child)     x        x-date   09/11/2006    x-date
    20     Non BOM    1     2        x-date   09/06/2006    x-date  
    30     FREIGHT      1      2        x-date   09/06/2006    x-date  
    I know the above example may not be that clear, but this is the space available when you post your topic.
    Based on the above example, the earliest material available date is for Line item 20 i.e. 09/06/2006 and assume FREIGHT is also tied to the above line item (20) i.e. line item 20 & 30 are delivery grouped.
    Say if I delete line item 20, now FREIGHT should be tied to line item 10 and delivery grouping should also take place get changed to 1 for FREIGHT item.
    I need to achieve this using user-exits, but HOW?
    Appreciate your views and the solution for the scenario.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Suresh Ganti

    Hi Suresh,
    I guess you can accomplish this using SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in MV45AFZZ. In table xvbap you will find all order items with an update indicator. If an item has indicator 'D' (deleted) and field GRKOR (delivery group) filled you should find the corresponding FREIGHT line having the same value for GRKOR. Then find the remaining non-FREIGHT item with the earliest material availability date and set the value of GRKOR for this item to the same value as the FREIGHT item.
    Regards,
    John.

  • Variations issues with User & Group Site Column value

    Hi all,
    I have created variation sites. e.g. http://mydomain/en-us for english & http://mydomain/de-de for german language. I have created custom page layouts. This page layouts are based on custom content types. I have created a column called "User"
    which is type of "User/Groups". I am registering this column to my page layout.  http://mydomain/de-de is my default site.
    Now I am editing column called "User" on page & save it. It saves data properly. But when I am propagating these changes to another site that is http://mydomain/en-us. It shows me all controls with values filled. but with "User"
    column, its showing me blank value.
    Any suggestion. ?
    Thanks in advance.

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:kNlxGIj5f1kJ:sjoere.blogspot.com/2007/11/5-reasons-why-you-should-not-use.html+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
    Content types not propagated
    Risk
    When you add a content type to a page library in the variation source, this type is not automatically propagated to the other labels (see
    my previous post). If you then create a page with that content type in the variation source, it does get published to the other labels but loses its content type field values.
    Proposed solutions
    Set up your site via a site definition that already contains the proper content type bindings to the page libraries. All labels will use the same content types
    Put a good governance plan in place to make sure manual changes are done in every label
    If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

  • Issuance Authorization Based on Group Membership

    Hello,
    I have what should be a simple problem but for the life of me I can't get my claims to work like I believe they should.  We use BOX with open enrollment and are looking at restricting who can access the site and have an account provisioned for them.
     The goal is to use an existing set of groups to restrict access to the BOX site.  I've read many posts about creating Issuance Authorization claims and have copied their examples for my use but nothing seems to work.
    Our group naming standard for BOX access is "app-box-*" as we have several groups that are all billable to different areas.  I want to use "app-box'*" in the language so I don't have to add 50 different rules for each group.
    Claims that are being sent to BOX right now are: Email Address, Given name, surname, name, and group.  I'm only sending BOX the app-box* groups a user is a member of by using this rule:
    c:[Type == "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/claims/Group", Value =~ "^App-Box-.*"] => issue(claim = c);
    That seems to work just fine as I see the groups listed in my claim to BOX in my Fiddler trace.  Next step is to create the issuance rules and restrict the access.  I've tried two different rules so far and both haven't worked.  I've also
    modified them to just refer to one of the BOX groups specifically instead of the wildcard, but still no dice...
    Claim built by the "permit or deny users based on incoming claim" wizard
    c:[Type == "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/claims/Group", Value =~ "^App-Box-.*"]
     => issue(Type = "http://schemas.microsoft.com/authorization/claims/permit", Value = "PermitUsersWithClaim");
    Custom rule built by me from various blog posts.
    Exists([Type == "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/claims/Group", Value =~ "^App-Box-.*"])
     => issue(Type = "http://schemas.microsoft.com/authorization/claims/permit", Value = "true");
    I get the dreaded event 325:
    The Federation Service could  not authorize token issuance for caller 'DOM\username
    '. The caller is not authorized to request a token for the relying party 'box.net'. Please see event 501 with the same instance id for caller identity. 
    Additional Data 
    Instance id: fe28fe86-b588-472f-9a35-7818a5be53d4 
    Relying party: box.net 
    Exception details: 
    Microsoft.IdentityServer.Service.IssuancePipeline.CallerAuthorizationException: MSIS5007: The caller authorization failed for caller identity DOM\Username for relying party trust box.net.
       at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Threading.AsyncResult.End(IAsyncResult result)
       at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Threading.TypedAsyncResult`1.End(IAsyncResult result)
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Service.SamlProtocol.SamlProtocolService.Issue(IssueRequest issueRequest)
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Service.SamlProtocol.SamlProtocolService.ProcessRequest(Message requestMessage) 
    User Action 
    Use the AD FS 2.0 Management snap-in to ensure that the caller is authorized to request a token for the relying party.
    Error 325 is eventually followed by error 364:
    Encountered error during federation passive request. 
    Additional Data 
    Exception details: 
    Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.AuthorizationFailedException: MSIS7011: Access denied.
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.FederationPassiveAuthentication.RequestBearerToken(HttpSamlRequestMessage httpSamlRequest, SecurityTokenElement onBehalfOf, String& samlpSessionState, String& samlpAuthenticationProvider)
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.FederationPassiveAuthentication.BuildSignInResponseCoreWithSerializedToken(String signOnToken, WSFederationMessage incomingMessage)
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.FederationPassiveAuthentication.BuildSignInResponseForProtocolRequest(FederationPassiveContext federationPassiveContext, SecurityToken securityToken)
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.FederationPassiveAuthentication.BuildSignInResponse(FederationPassiveContext federationPassiveContext, SecurityToken securityToken)
    Can anyone help point me in the right direction?  Using ADFS 2.0 server 2008r2.  No proxies or anything, just direct connections to the ADFS boxes.
    Thanks,
    Adam

    Issuance Authorization rules are executed BEFORE the transform rules so you're looking for a claim that doesn't exist (yet). Create a rule at the top of your authorization rule tab using "add" instead of "issue" then in a following
    rule (same tab) issue the permit depending on if the user has that claim.
    WORK

  • Issue with Service Group Configuration for a BPM Process

    Hi,
    I am working on BPM processes on CE 711. I need to use the Service Group settings. I created a BPM process with a automated activity that maps to an enterprise service in HU2 (SAP ES Workplace system).
    After setting up the configuration in NWA for service registry and service group, I run the BPM process. The Enterprise Service runs into error and log records it as 'No matching BindingData is found for SOA smart configuration'. I have done most of the configuration as recommended but the matching end point
    url seems to be picked wrongly [http://erp.esworkplace.sap.com/sap/bc/srt/xip/sap/ecc_employeebasicdbyemployeeqr?sap-client=800] .
    I could not get any info on notes search and could not get much info about service group config. Any help here is greatly appreciated.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi Suresh,
    i just got an answer on my ticket. Here it is:
    There is a known issue with the upper case of the endpoint published in
    the Services Registry and in the WSDL.
    Before SP2 the matching for the binding for invocation is done
    by the endpoint url. There is a known issue that the endpoint published
    in the Services Registry is with lower case of the characters but in theWSDL the endpoint is with upper case. In your case the endpoint url in
    the Services Registry is as shown in the exception above:
    http://erp.esworkplace.sap.com/sap/bc/srt/xip/sap/ecc_srvcreqcrtrc?sap-client=800
    but in the WSDL the endpoint url is with upper case of the endpoint:
    ../ECC_SRVCREQCRTRC/..
    Because of this difference the call fails. This is fixed is 711 SP2.
    Workaround for this is if you create a Provider System based on your
    WSDL, not a Services Registry one.
    Hope that helps...
    Best regards
    Michael

Maybe you are looking for