Supressing rows from query

Hi All
I need to supress few rows(records) in the query. I can do it with conditions, but using conditions the result row wont be supressed. The amount in the supressed row wud reflect in result. I, however dont want it to be reflected in the result. Please advice if there is any workaround.
I have a debtor age analyasis report, which shouldnt show debtors with credit balances. the customer with credit balances shouldnt appear in the report at all. The cube however has these values, which are being used foir other reprots on the same cube. How can one supress them in the query? Pls advice
Thanks in advance
Regards
PB

PB,
right-click on the result row. Go to:
Calculate > Results as > Total
That way it will only take the displayed rows, now it is set to undefined and then it will take all the rows in the back too.
Rob

Similar Messages

Getting a specified number of rows froma query

How can I get the minimum 3 row from a query after a order by in the select
Eg;
SELECT ROWNUM,ROWID, connection_id, GROUP_ID
FROM prov_pending_commands
ORDER BY group_id
4     AAAZWTAAYAAANMiAAA     680932     32702947
3      AAAZWTAAYAAANMgAAB     644610     32703643
2 AAAZWTAAYAAANLrAAB     51925942 32704602
1 AAAZWTAAYAAANLrAAA     61247803 32704613
I need to get only the group ids 32702947,32703643, 32704602 for some other processing.
I checked by getting rownum or row id, but after ordering it gives wrong data
Please need help

Hi,
Try this,
select * from (select name, row_number() over (order by name) as row_num from test) row_num
where row_num <= 3
If you are looking for something else explain us more with sample output.
Thanks!
M T

Business Objects is not returning all rows from Query

We set the rowcount to 1000000 and the business objects query only returns 16,960 rows. We then uncheck the limit for the rowcount and the first run of the query returns 65,535. The subsequent run of the query returns all the rows which is greater than 65,535. We are on release 6.1A of business objects and selecting from Microsoft SQLServer 2005 in 2000 compatablility mode. We noticed that the rowcount being sent to SQLServer is replacing the set number with the 65,535 the first time the query is sent and subsiquent queries have the correct rowcount set. What would be causing the rowcount to be reset and how can it be fixed?

We set the rowcount to 1000000 and the business objects query only returns 16,960 rows. We then uncheck the limit for the rowcount and the first run of the query returns 65,535. The subsequent run of the query returns all the rows which is greater than 65,535. We are on release 6.1A of business objects and selecting from Microsoft SQLServer 2005 in 2000 compatablility mode. We noticed that the rowcount being sent to SQLServer is replacing the set number with the 65,535 the first time the query is sent and subsiquent queries have the correct rowcount set. What would be causing the rowcount to be reset and how can it be fixed?

Programmatically get result rows from query component?

I am using a af:query for searching values without the table. When i search, is there any way in which i can get the search results Programmatically?
Thanks
Ajay

Intercept the query invokation using your own queryListener method, and then get the Iterator from the VO. http://jobinesh.blogspot.com/2011/03/retrieving-viewcriteria-from-custom.html

SQL query that returns exclusive rows from groups

I'm using modified scott/tiger data for this.
I've got two tables
DEPT_X
DEPTNO     DNAME             LOC     CODE_ID     SUB_DEPTNO
10     ACCOUNTING     NEW YORK 111     101
10     SALES             ATWN      111     102
10     SALES             BTWN      112     103
20     RESEARCH     DALLAS      111     201
20     RESEARCH     CTWN      111     202
30     SALES             CHICAGO      111     301
40     OPERATIONS     BOSTON      112     401and
BI_PD
CODE_ID     PD_TYPE     BI_TYPE
111          -1
112     -1     I want to write a query that joins the code_ids of the two tables and lists out either only the records from DEPT_X who's code_ids have a -1 in the PD_TYPE(112) column and none of the code_ids that have a -1 in the BI_TYPE(111) column for each department or if that department has code_ids for the BI_TYPE (111), list out those rows. So for Deptno 10 you'll only get the row with SUB_DEPTNO = 103. But if for that DEPTNO= 20 you'll get the rows for both SUB_DEPTNO = 201 and 202.
So the result should look like
DEPTNO   SUB_DEPTNO
10          103
20          201
20          202
30          301.
Basically I just want rows from each department that have code_ids = 111 not to show up if there are code_ids = 112.
What is the query to do this?
Message was edited by:
user623359
Message was edited by:
user623359
Message was edited by:
user623359
Message was edited by:
user623359
Message was edited by:
user623359

One way could be:
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
SQL> with dept_x as (
2      select 10 deptno, 'ACCOUNTING' dname, 'NEW YORK' loc, 111 code_id, 101 sub_deptno from dual
union all
3      select 10, 'SALES', 'ATWN', 111, 102 from dual union all
4      select 10, 'SALES', 'BTWN', 112, 103 from dual union all
5      select 20, 'RESEARCH', 'DALLAS', 111, 201 from dual union all
6      select 20, 'RESEARCH', 'CTWN', 111, 202 from dual union all
7      select 30, 'SALES', 'CHICAGO', 111, 301 from dual union all
8      select 40, 'OPERATIONS', 'BOSTON', 112, 401 from dual ),
9 --
10 bi_pd as(
11      select 111 code_id, null pd_type, -1 bi_type from dual union all
12      select 112, -1, null from dual),
13 --
14 t as(
15      select a.deptno,a.sub_deptno from dept_x a, bi_pd b
16      where a.code_id = b.code_id and b.pd_type = -1)
17 --
18 select a.deptno,a.sub_deptno
19 from dept_x a, bi_pd b
20 where a.code_id = b.code_id and b.bi_type = -1 and
21        (a.deptno) not in (select deptno from t)
22 union
23 select deptno,sub_deptno from t;
    DEPTNO SUB_DEPTNO
        10        103
        20        201
        20        202
        30        301
        40        401

How do you limit the number of rows return from query?

How do you limit the number of rows return from query? Do all databases support this kind of feature?

i think the standard is limit
to get the top 30
select * from mytable LIMIT 30;returns the first 30 rows
also if you want a range
select * from mytable LIMIT 10,30;returns 30 rows starting from 10
this last one is useful for displaying ranges... something similar happens in these forums when viewing topics and messages

Updating, Adding, or Deleting rows from a query

So, I've got this page that originally was made of four
different forms. It worked great. But, then the client asked that I
"idiot proof" the page.
Originally, I had a form that enclosed a one-line table (with
Add & Clear buttons on the end) that took seven fields and
"added" a new record to the "tbljob" table.
That was followed with another form that created a table from
the results of a cfquery and listed all the rows from tbljob (with
Update/Delete buttons on the end of each row).
This worked fine when it was two separate forms. Now, I'm
trying to use only one "form" while displaying the two tables. The
buttons are now done with Javascript (so there are dialog boxes).
The problem is that I am getting a CF error message because the
insert, update, and delete commands are trying to pass the contents
of the fields as comma-delimited lists rather than the single data
item that is actually in each field. I am passing a hidden field
with each row that contains the "job_id".
I know the problem is that I'm not identifying each row as
being unique. I guess it's like I'm passing an "array" of data
rather than just a "row".
Basically, I just want to be able to display a blank row for
adding records followed by multiple rows from a query. The blank
row needs to have "Add" and "Cancel" buttons at the end and the
multi-row part has to have "Update" and "Delete" buttons on the end
of each row and manage the appropriate records.
It's got me stumped. TIA.

What you can do is try using <cfloop> to insert, update
and delete your information.
For instance deleting the information try this.

<cfloop index="JobIDs" list="#Job_ID#" delimiters=",">
<cfquery name="delteall" datasource="dbsource">
DELETE
FROM table
Where job_Id = #JobIDs#
</cfquery>
</cfloop>
Do the same for your inserting and updating.
Because what CF see is job_id = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
SO you are looping over a list = #job_id# and delimiter is "
, " and we are calling the index JobIDs. JobIDs are the values - 1
2 3 4 5 6 ....
I hope this helps. As for the displaying of the images, use
if then statements:
<cfif isdefined("edittable") and edittable eq '"y">
Then display the query and outputs for the editing options
<cfelseif isdefined("deletetable") and addtable eq "y">
The dispaly the query and outputs for adding options
<cfelse>
Then display the query for outputing the delete options
</cfif>
So your link will have soemthing of this sort <a
href="samepage.cfm?deletetable=y">Add Table</a>
Hope this helps,
Sevor Klu

To select particular rows from order by select query

Hi all,
I want to select particular rows from a order by select query like...
select * from emp order by ename;
If i pass 3 and 7 dynamically in where clause or something like that, it has to show rows from 3 to 7 only.
Thanks in advance
Pal

This?
SQL> select *
from (
   select e.*,
      row_number() over (order by ename) rn
   from emp e)
where rn in (3,7)
EMPNO ENAME      JOB         MGR HIREDATE         SAL       COMM     DEPTNO RN
7698 BLAKE      MANAGER    7839 01-MAY-81       2850                    30 3
7566 JONES      MANAGER    7839 02-APR-81       2975                    20 7
2 rows selected.

Grouping rows from a query

Hi everyone!
I want to know if it's posible to group the rows from a query into a unique row. Example:
SELECT Field_1 FROM Table_1
Returns the following fileds:
Field_1
A
B
C
D
I would want to modify my query so that the result obtained would be a single row containing all the others. In the previous example the result would be "ABCD".
Thanks in advance. Best regards,

-- For anyone who wants to test this,
-- just copy this entire post as is,
-- save it to a .sql file, then start that file.
-- Before doing this,
-- make sure that you don't already have
-- a table named table_1 that would be dropped
-- or a .sql file named query.sql that would be overwritten.
-- If you do, then change the names below to avoid any conflicts.
-- In order to understand what the code is doing,
-- please read all of the comments included in this file,
-- as not everything is displayed when you run it.
-- I have gone into great detail with this
-- because I have posted similar things before
-- and a lot of people have total missed the fact
-- that it is not a static query,
-- that the results are dependent upon the number of rows,
-- and that it works for any number of rows,
-- even when the number of rows is unknonwn.
-- test data:
DROP TABLE table_1
CREATE TABLE table_1
(field_1 VARCHAR2 (1))
INSERT INTO table_1 (field_1)
VALUES ('A')
INSERT INTO table_1 (field_1)
VALUES ('B')
INSERT INTO table_1 (field_1)
VALUES ('C')
INSERT INTO table_1 (field_1)
VALUES ('D')
COMMIT
SELECT * FROM table_1
-- Running the code below will create and start
-- a file named query.sql which will contain the query below,
-- which will produce the results below that:
-- query that will be created:
-- SELECT MAX(DECODE(ROWNUM,1,field_1,NULL))
-- ||MAX(DECODE(ROWNUM,2,field_1,NULL))
-- ||MAX(DECODE(ROWNUM,3,field_1,NULL))
-- ||MAX(DECODE(ROWNUM,4,field_1,NULL))
-- FROM table_1 GROUP BY NULL;
-- results that will be produced:
-- ABCD
-- Notice that in this example,
-- there are only four values concatenated
-- because there are only four rows in the table.
-- If there were more rows, it would concatenate more values.
-- The number of concatenated values
-- is dependent upon the number of rows.
-- The following dynamic sql uses a single query,
-- which produces and executes a single query,
-- whose number of concatenated values is dependent
-- upon the number of rows in the table.
-- Because the echo is set off in the first line,
-- you won't see this code when you run it,
-- just the query that it creates.
SET     ECHO OFF FEEDBACK OFF HEADING OFF PAGESIZE 0 VERIFY OFF
SPOOL   query.sql
-- This is the start of the single query:
SELECT text
FROM    (SELECT 1                                             AS orderby,
                'SELECT MAX(DECODE(ROWNUM,1,field_1,NULL))'   AS text
         FROM   DUAL
         UNION
         -- This section is the part that dynamically creates
         -- one additional concatenated value
         -- for each additional row after the first row.
         -- This is just a subquery within the single query.
         SELECT rn                                            AS orderby,
                '||MAX(DECODE(ROWNUM,'||rn||',field_1,NULL))' AS text
         FROM   (SELECT ROWNUM rn
                 FROM   table_1)
         WHERE rn > 1
         UNION
         SELECT COUNT (*) + 1                                  AS orderby,
                'FROM table_1 GROUP BY NULL;'                  AS text
         FROM   table_1)
ORDER BY orderby;
-- This is the end of the single query.
SPOOL    OFF
START    query
SET      ECHO ON
-- If you want to see the file containing
-- the single query that was created, then just:
-- SQL> EDIT query.sql

How do I get last 15 rows from a select query

Hello,
I am writing a query, and I need to filter the last 15 rows of from the select query.
For example: Select id, name,join_date from emp order by join_date;
So I need to get the last 15 rows from emp table so that we can who are the last 15 employees joined the organization. I want to show the result in ascending order, otherwise I would have taken first 15 rows with order by clause as descinding order.
Thanks in advance,
Param.

SQL> select ename, join_date from test222
2 where rownum < 6
3 order by join_date
4 /
ENAME JOIN_DATE
CNC5461177794 14-FEB-02
OR91551178218 14-FEB-02
TUB9894676495 14-FEB-02
SG15431177117 14-FEB-02
PIB9384674017 14-FEB-02
SQL> SELECT * from
2 (select ename, join_date from test222
3 order by join_date desc)
4 WHERE rownum < 6
5 /
ENAME JOIN_DATE
II61111208401 19-MAR-02
II61451208038 18-MAR-02
PI20014184983 01-MAR-02
BNF2221148037C 28-FEB-02
UO78902581 18-FEB-02
Can you see the problem now ?
You can test this concept with your own table.
have a good day,
Sri

Single row from this query without create a group by

Can I have a single row from this query without create a group by on tipo (TIPO can have only 2 value (A,D)
SELECT
CASE TIPO
WHEN 'D' THEN SUM(IMPORTO) ELSE 0 END DIMPORTO,
CASE TIPO
WHEN 'A' THEN SUM(IMPORTO) ELSE 0 END AIMPORTO
FROM MGIORNALE
WHERE K_CONTO = '100001' --CONTO
AND DECODE(T_MOVIM,'MRAP',TO_DATE('31/12/'||to_char(a_competenza),'DD/MM/YYYY'),DATA_RG)
-- BETWEEN DATAA AND DATAB
BETWEEN '01/01/2006' AND '31/12/2006'
--GROUP BY TIPO
--AND TIPO = COL_conto
Thanks in advance

Is like this?
sum (CASE TIPO
WHEN 'D' THEN IMPORTO ELSE 0 END) DIMPORTO,

SQL query - select one row from each date group

Hi,
I have data as follows.
Visit_Date Visit_type Consultant
05/09/2009 G name1
05/09/2009 G name2
05/09/2009 G name3
06/09/2009 I name4
07/09/2009 G name5
07/09/2009 G name6
How to select data as follows
05/09/2009 G name1
06/09/2009 G name4
07/09/2009 G name5
i.e one row from every visit_date
Thanks,
MK Nathan
Edited by: k_murali on Oct 7, 2009 10:44 PM

Are you after this (one row per date per visit_type)
with dd as (select to_date('05/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name1' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('05/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name2' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('05/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name3' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('06/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name4' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('07/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name5' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('07/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name6' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('07/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'F' Visit_type, 'name7' Consultant from dual)
select trunc(visit_date) visit_date, visit_type, min(consultant)
from   dd
group by trunc(visit_date), visit_type
order by trunc(visit_date);
VISIT_DAT V MIN(C
09/MAY/09 G name1
09/JUN/09 G name4
09/JUL/09 G name5
09/JUL/09 F name7or are you after only one row per date?:
with dd as (select to_date('05/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name1' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('05/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name2' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('05/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name3' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('06/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name4' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('07/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name5' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('07/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'G' Visit_type, 'name6' Consultant from dual
            union all
            select to_date('07/09/2009','MM/DD/YYYY') Visit_Date, 'F' Visit_type, 'name7' Consultant from dual)
select trunc(visit_date) visit_date, min(visit_type) visit_type, min(consultant)
from   dd
group by trunc(visit_date)
order by trunc(visit_date);
VISIT_DAT V MIN(C
09/MAY/09 G name1
09/JUN/09 G name4
09/JUL/09 F name5

Delete Rows from T1 which are Not in T2

Hi
I've 2 Tables like below
T1
N1
N2
2
11
2
22
3
33
8
44
8
88
T2
N1
N2
2
22
8
88
If I Run Delete query, I must delete Rows from T1 which are Not in T2
For example, I must delete Rows 1,3,4 from T1
So how to write that delete query? Please advice

Delete from T1
Where not Exists (select * from T2 Where t1.N1=t2.N1 and t1.N2=t2.N2)
--or
Delete t
From t1 t
left JOIN t2 m
ON m.N1=t.N1 and m.N2=t.N2
WHERE m.N1 is null and m.N2 is null
--Or
;With mycte as
select N1,N2 from T1
Except
select N1,N2 from T2
Delete t
From t1 t
INNER JOIN mycte m
ON m.N1=t.N1 and m.N2=t.N2

How to hide row from table after logical delete

Hello.
I am using Jdeveloper 11.1.1.3.0, ADF BC and ADF Faces.
I want to implement Logical delete in my application.
In my Entity object I have Deleted attribute and I override the remove() method in my EntityImpl class.
    @Override
    public void remove()
       setDeleted("Y");
    }and I added this condition to my view object
WHERE NVL(Deleted,'N') <> 'Y'in my page I have a table. this table has a column to delete each row. I dragged and drop RemoveRowWithKey action from the data control
and set the parameter to *#{row.rowKeyStr}* .
I what I need is this:
when the user click the delete button I want to hide the roe from the table. I tried to re-execute the query after the delete but the row is still on the page. Why execute query does not hide the row from the screen.
here is the code I used for delete and execute query
    public String deleteLogically()
        BindingContainer bindings = getBindings();
        OperationBinding operationBinding = bindings.getOperationBinding("removeRowWithKey");
        Object result = operationBinding.execute();
        DCBindingContainer dc=(DCBindingContainer) bindings;
        DCIteratorBinding iter=dc.findIteratorBinding("TakenMaterialsView4Iterator");
        iter.getCurrentRow().setAttribute("Deleted", "Y");
        //iter.getViewObject().executeQuery();
        iter.executeQuery();
        return null;
    }as you see I used two method iter.getViewObject().executeQuery(); and iter.executeQuery(); but the result is same.

Thank you Jobinesh.
I used this method.
    @Override
    protected boolean rowQualifies(ViewRowImpl viewRowImpl)
      Object attrValue =viewRowImpl.getAttribute("Deleted");
        if (attrValue != null) {
         if ("Y".equals(attrValue))
            return false;
         else
            return true;
        return super.rowQualifies(viewRowImpl);
    }But I have one drawback for using it, and here is the case:
If the user clicks the delete button *(no commit)* the row will be hidden in the table, but when the user click cancel changes the row is not returned since it is not returned due to the rowQualifies(ViewRowImpl viewRowImpl) (the Deleted attribute is set to "N" now).
here is the code for delete and cancel change buttons
    public String deleteLogically()
        BindingContainer bindings = getBindings();
        OperationBinding operationBinding =
            bindings.getOperationBinding("removeRowWithKey");
        Object result = operationBinding.execute();
        DCBindingContainer dc = (DCBindingContainer)bindings;
        DCIteratorBinding iter =
            dc.findIteratorBinding("TakenMaterialsView4Iterator");
        iter.getCurrentRow().setAttribute("Deleted", "Y");
         iter.executeQuery();
        AdfFacesContext adfFacesContext = AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
        adfFacesContext.addPartialTarget(this.getTakenMaterialsTable());
        return null;
    public String cancelChanges(String iteratorName)
        System.out.println("begin cancel change");
        BindingContainer bindings =
            BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
        DCBindingContainer dc = (DCBindingContainer)bindings;
        DCIteratorBinding iter =
            (DCIteratorBinding)dc.findIteratorBinding(iteratorName);
        ViewObject vo = iter.getViewObject();
        //create a secondary RowSetIterator to avoid disturbing row currency
        RowSetIterator rsi = vo.createRowSetIterator(null);
        //move the currency to the slot before the first row.
        rsi.reset();
        while (rsi.hasNext())
                currentRow = rsi.next();
                currentRow.setAttribute("Deleted", "N");
        rsi.closeRowSetIterator();
        iter.executeQuery();
        AdfFacesContext adfFacesContext = AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
        adfFacesContext.addPartialTarget(this.getTakenMaterialsTable());
        return null;
    }as example, if the user initially has 8 rows, then deleted 2 rows, in cancelChanges only 6 rows appears. and the deleted rows are not there??
any suggestion?

Master Child tables how to get the latest rows from both

Hi,
Need some help with the sql. I have two tables Master & Child. In my Master table I have multiple rows for the same record and in the child table also multiple rows for the same master row how can I get the latest one's from both.
For example Data in my Master table looks like
CONT_ID                  SEQ_NUM        DESCRIPTION
1                         189             Update 2
1                         188             Update 1
1                         187              NewNow in the child table for the same CONT_ID I may have the following rows
CONT_ID                   UPDATED_DATE                                     STATUS
1                        3/16/2010 2:19:01.552700 PM                          P
1                        3/16/2010 12:29:01.552700 PM                         A
1                        3/16/2010 12:29:01.552700 PM                         P
1                        3/16/2010 12:19:01.552700 PM                         NIn my final query how can I get the row with seq_num 189 as it's the latest in Master table and from child table the row with status of P as it's the latest one based on the time. Here is the query i have but it returns the latest row from the child table only and basically repeats the master table rows as opposed to one row that is latest from both:
Thanks

Hi,
You can use the analytic ROW_NUMKBER function to find the latest row for each cont_id in each table:
WITH     got_m_rnum     AS
     SELECT     cont_id,     seq_num,     description
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY cont_id
                               ORDER BY         seq_num     DESC
                       ) AS m_rnum
     FROM    master_table
--     WHERE     ...     -- any filtering goes here
,     got_c_rnum     AS
     SELECT     cont_id, updated_date,     status
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY cont_id
                               ORDER BY         updated_date     DESC
                       ) AS c_rnum
     FROM    child_table
--     WHERE     ...     -- any filtering goes here
SELECT     m.cont_id,     m.seq_num,     m.description
,     c.updated_date,     c.status
FROM     got_m_rnum     m
JOIN     got_c_rnum     c     ON     m.cont_id     = c.cont_id
                    AND     m.m_rnum     = c.c_rnum
                    AND     m.m_rnum     = 1
;If you'd like to post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for the sample data, then I could test this.
If there happens to be a tie for the latest row (say, there are only two rows in the child_table with a certain cont_id, and both have exactly the same updated_date), then this query will arbitrarily choose one of them as the latest.

Supressing rows from query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for