Business Objects is not returning all rows from Query

We set the rowcount to 1000000 and the business objects query only returns 16,960 rows. We then uncheck the limit for the rowcount and the first run of the query returns 65,535. The subsequent run of the query returns all the rows which is greater than 65,535. We are on release 6.1A of business objects and selecting from Microsoft SQLServer 2005 in 2000 compatablility mode. We noticed that the rowcount being sent to SQLServer is replacing the set number with the 65,535 the first time the query is sent and subsiquent queries have the correct rowcount set. What would be causing the rowcount to be reset and how can it be fixed?

Similar Messages

Loop Not Returning All Rows

I finally need to turn to the forum after trying for a few days to resolve my problem I decide to turn to the Oracle people for help.
The following code below does two things:
1. If I have the get_menu_label in side of it's own loop it never returns
2. If I take the get_menu_label out side of it's own loop it returns but does not return all the data.
DECLARE
-- GETTING THE DATABASE NAME
CURSOR get_db_name
IS
SELECT DATABASE
FROM uaf_mfgp_menus_and_groups_vm
GROUP BY DATABASE
ORDER BY DATABASE ASC;
-- GETTING THE OBJECT_ID FOR EACH DATABASE
CURSOR get_object_id_db (l_db_name VARCHAR2)
IS
SELECT object_id
FROM UAF_FORM_OBJECTS
WHERE object_label_2 = l_db_name;
-- GETTING THE GROUP NAME
CURSOR get_gp_name
IS
SELECT group_name
FROM uaf_mfgp_menus_and_groups_vm
GROUP BY group_name
ORDER BY group_name ASC;
-- GETTING THE OBJECT_ID FOR GROUP WITH GP NAME AND DATABASE
CURSOR get_object_id_gp (l_gp_name VARCHAR2, db_id NUMBER)
IS
SELECT object_id
FROM UAF_FORM_OBJECTS
WHERE object_label_2 = l_gp_name AND parent_object_id = db_id;
-- GETTING MENU LABEL
CURSOR get_menu_label (l_db_name VARCHAR2, l_gp_name VARCHAR2)
IS
SELECT menu_label
FROM uaf_mfgp_menus_and_groups_vm
WHERE DATABASE = l_db_name AND group_name = l_gp_name;
got_object_id_db NUMBER (20);
got_object_id_gp NUMBER (20);
got_db VARCHAR2 (100);
got_menu_label VARCHAR2 (200);
BEGIN
FOR c1 IN get_db_name
LOOP
FOR c2 IN get_gp_name
LOOP
OPEN get_object_id_db (c1.DATABASE);
FETCH get_object_id_db
INTO got_object_id_db;
OPEN get_object_id_gp (c2.group_name, got_object_id_db);
FETCH get_object_id_gp
INTO got_object_id_gp;
CLOSE get_object_id_db;
CLOSE get_object_id_gp;
OPEN get_menu_label (c1.DATABASE, c2.group_name);
LOOP
FETCH get_menu_label
INTO got_menu_label;
END LOOP;
CLOSE get_menu_label;
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ( 'GP_OBJECT_ID= '
|| got_object_id_gp
|| ' '
|| 'MENU_LABEL= '
|| got_menu_label
END LOOP;
END LOOP;
END;
/

Javier, this the wrong way to use PL/SQL. Oracle SQL can do all this for you using JOINs.
This code, even if it did work, would be terrible slow - unable to scale with data volumes.
This code breaks a few fundamental Oracle rules:
- row-by-row processing using PL/SQL
- huge number of context swicthes per PL/SQL loop iteration
- not maximizing SQL and minimizing PL/SQL
I suggest you trash this code and write a SQL JOIN instead.

ExecuteWithParams is not returning the rows from cache

Hi,
We have two VO's based on same entity ,whenever new row is inserted in one VO and we do executeWithParams on another VO ,It is not returning the rows which are uncommitted.
I replaced the executeWithParams with a custom method in AM in which I am executing the query after applying the view criteria and setting query mode.Its returning rows which are uncommitted.
Jdev Version which I am using is 11.1.1.7.0
ExecuteWithParams used to work with uncommitted data in 11.1.1.6.0 .
Do we need to raise a bug on framework or Am I missing something?
Edited by: sharavnkumar_malla on Oct 18, 2012 1:02 AM

Still the same answer, even after you updated the question. We (the public) don't have 11.1.1.7, know nothing about 11.1.1.7, and cannot help you with 11.1.1.7. Questions about internal builds belong on internal forums.

OdbcDataAdapter.Fill() not getting all rows from RDB using 64bit driver

I am using VS2012 Pro on Windows 7 (64-bit). I am migrating an older 32-bit VS2008 app to the new environment. I'm building for the .NET Framework 4.5.
The app queries an RDB database and uses the Oracle RDB drivers version 3.3.2.0. When I build as a 32-bit app and use the 32-bit Oracle RDB Driver, the query succeeds and returns all 341 data rows. When I built it as 64-bit and use the 64-bit driver, I only
get the first 101 rows.
Oracle says the problem is in the OdbcDataAdapter.Fill() method. I was able to confirm this. I created an OdbcDataReader and used the debugger to see what was being read, I can see all 341 rows, but when I use the DataAdapter.Fill (or DataSet.Load) method,
the results are truncated to 101 rows. Changing the SQL to query different tables does not change the problem. Below is a code sample:
        private DataSet runQuery()
            string connString32 = @"PROVIDER=MSDASQL;DRIVER={Oracle RDB Driver};SVR=myserver;DATABASE=ATTACH 'filename mydatabase';CLS=myclassname;uid=myusername;pwd=mypassword;xpt=2";
            string connString64 = @"PROVIDER=MSDASQL;DRIVER={Oracle RDB Driver 64 Bit};SVR=myserver;DATABASE=ATTACH 'filename mydatabase';CLS=myclassname;uid=myusername;pwd=mypassword;xpt=2";
            string sql = "SELECT person_id FROM person_tab";
            DataSet ds = new DataSet();
            using (OdbcConnection conn = new OdbcConnection(connString64))
                OdbcCommand cmd = new OdbcCommand(sql, conn);
                OdbcDataAdapter da = new OdbcDataAdapter();
                da.SelectCommand = cmd;
                conn.Open();
                da.Fill(ds, "myDataSet");
            return ds;
Has anyone else encountered this problem? If so, how did you get around it?

Hello,
Since I do not have the RDB database, I made a test with both 32bit and 64bit ODBC Driver 11 for SQL Server and query for 1000 records, however, both of them can work fine.
As far as I know, the ODBC is just a component as a bridge to connect the driver and the application and since you are use the Oracle RDB driver, I suggest you posting it to the Oracle forum:
https://community.oracle.com/community/developer/english
Regards.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Regular Report Not Returning All Rows

Greetings,
On APEX version 4.1.1.00.23 Using latest versions of Chrome and IE. I found some threads that discussed this aspect some, but not to the extent that is helpful to my situation.
I know it is crazy to have APEX return 40K+ rows on a report, but I have a need to do so. I need to return that many rows from a table so that an APEX page can be opened via Excel and then have an Excel macro run over the report results and import all 40K+ rows into a worksheet. As I said, that's crazy, but the decision isn't mine. :-) We have the macro working and it passes parameters to the APEX page and imports data from the APEX page.
Also, the report has 14 columns on it, not that many.
Given the requirement above I have a regular report page that only has the report and 2 page items on it. The page items contain values that are passed via Excel and are then used in the WHERE condition of the report. Using the same WHERE condition, when I run the SQL for the report outside of APEX it returns 46,840 rows. I have the both the Number of Rows and Maximum Row Count settings set to 50000. And, I have the Pagination Scheme set to Row Ranges X to Y of Z (with pagination).
When I run the page and enter the selection criteria the report only returns 15,500 rows. Yes, that's a lot rows. And, it takes about 5 minutes to populate. But, it doesn't return ALL of the rows. Also, the pagination suggests that all rows were returned because it reads - row(s) 1 to 15500 of 15500. I have changed the pagination and max rows settings a lot to see of it's just a matter of having the correct report setting. I've yet to find a setting that will cause the whole 46840 result set to be returned.
It may end up that the report selection needs to change in order to return fewer rows. But, regardless of that why isn't APEX returning the complete result set now? And, is there a way to force it to return the complete result set regardless of the size?
Any suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks, Tony

cloaked wrote:
Thanks for the response. Yup, you're correct. Downloading to a CSV might be better. I've set reports up that way many, many times. I have even developed pages that import from a CSV into APEX using PL/SQL, years before it was an APEX feature. I initially set the report up to allow it to be downloaded, but the user doesn't want it to work that way.
The worksheet will be used by a lot of people in our accounting department and they want the process to be as simple as possible. Right now Excel opens up the APEX page, logs into the application, passes parameters to it for the month and company, hits the Select button, waits on the report to build, then automatically imports it, and finally closes the page. It is quite slick. Yes, it takes 5 minutes to run, but the user is OK with that given what the automation provides.
So, in order for the automated import to work properly all 45K rows need to display on one page, without pagination. I currently have pagination on the page simply to determine if APEX is returning all of the rows.A process of this nature might work better using an export: XML or export: CSV report template, which won't go anywhere near pagination. When a page containing a report using these templates is requested APEX sends the report results in XML or CSV format rather than rendering the page. This should be faster, avoid complications with pagination, and be easier to parse in Excel.
Previous thread along similar lines: +{thread:id=2285213}+

DB Adapter not returning all columns from a sql table type

Using Soa Suite 10.1.3.4.
Calling DB Adapter from bpel to a database package procedure with an OUT NOCOPY parameter based on a TABLE OF type.
It works fine except that I only get the first 14 columns out of 55.
Can query all columns from Sqldeveloper or Sqlplus.
XML skema reflects all columns correct.
Same result without NOCOPY in parameter.
HaveI missed some details/limitations?

hi
here is how I solved it.
first create custom view that will find all requred data.
in my case it was
tables :
ADRCITYT
ADRCITY
ADRPCDCITY
T005S
T005U
joins :
ADRCITY     CLIENT     =     ADRCITYT     CLIENT
ADRCITY     COUNTRY     =     ADRCITYT     COUNTRY
ADRCITY     CITY_CODE     =     ADRCITYT     CITY_CODE
ADRCITY     CLIENT     =     ADRPCDCITY     CLIENT
ADRCITY     COUNTRY     =     ADRPCDCITY     COUNTRY
ADRCITY     CITY_CODE     =     ADRPCDCITY     CITY_CODE
T005S     MANDT     =     ADRCITY     CLIENT
T005S     BLAND     =     ADRCITY     REGION
T005S     MANDT     =     T005U     MANDT
T005S     LAND1     =     T005U     LAND1
T005S     BLAND     =     T005U     BLAND
and finaly searh help
ORT01     3     3     PAD_ORT01
CITY_CODE     0     2     CITY_CODE
PSTLZ     1     1     PSTLZ_HR
STATE     4     4     REGIO
BEZEI     5     5     BEZEI20
COUNTRY     0     6     LAND1
LANGU     0     7     LANGU

Linux client not returning all entries from LDAP

We have Solaris and Linux systems using ODS 11.1.1.5.0 for login authentication. The Solaris clients see all the users with no problems, but the Linux systems are only seeing 2161 entries. I have SizeLimit set to 5000 and LookthroughLimit set to 30000 in ODS. There are VLV indexes created and Solaris is using them. When I do a getent passwd on Solaris I see this in the ODS logs :
[08/May/2012:13:32:53 -0400] conn=7 op=9133 msgId=9134 - SRCH base="ou=people,o=tsg,o=ge.com" scope=2 filter="(&(tsgunixstatus=A)(|(tsgservergroup=USERS)(tsgservergroup=nec_dev)))" attrs="cn uid uidNumber gidNumber gecos description tsgunixhomedirectory tsgunixloginshell"
[08/May/2012:13:32:53 -0400] conn=7 op=9133 msgId=9134 - SORT cn uid
[08/May/2012:13:32:53 -0400] conn=7 op=9133 msgId=9134 - VLV 0:999:0:0 1:5857 (0)
[08/May/2012:13:32:55 -0400] conn=7 op=9133 msgId=9134 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1000 etime=2
etc, until all the entries are returned. On Linux, the same getent passwd gets this in the ODS logs :
[08/May/2012:13:12:19 -0400] conn=8189 op=1 msgId=2 - SRCH base="ou=people,o=tsg,o=ge.com" scope=2 filter="(&(objectClass=tsgposixaccount)(&(tsgunixstatus=A)(|(tsgservergroup=USERS)(tsgservergroup=nec_dev))))" attrs="uid userPassword uidNumber gidNumber cn tsglinuxhomedirectory tsglinuxloginshell gecos description objectClass"
[08/May/2012:13:12:26 -0400] conn=8189 op=1 msgId=2 - RESULT err=11 tag=101 nentries=2161 etime=7 notes=U
[08/May/2012:13:12:26 -0400] conn=8189 op=2 msgId=0 - RESULT err=80 tag=120 nentries=0 etime=0
I see that Linux adds an extra (objectClass=tsgposixaccount) to the search filter, and I added VLV indexes for linux to match what is shown in the logs for the filter. The only piece I was not sure of was the Sort for the linux VLV, I used cn uid as Solaris uses.
Is there something I need to do to get the VLV's to work with Linux clients? I do not want to set my SizeLimit or LookthroughLimit to unlimited if I do not have to. The /etc/ldap.conf for linux are pretty standard. I did add a pagesize 1000 and nss_paged_results yes but neither was any help.
Thanks,
Jay

Hi Jay,
just looking at the access log, the output of the first search (the one performed by the Solaris client) basically queries/handles the first 1000 records, whereas the second search (issued by the linux client) is getting far more results even though the search filter in theory is more restrictive (having a logical AND plus: &(objectClass=tsgposixaccount) )
Did you by chance implemented the nsslapd-search-tune parameter in the dse.ldif, activating bits 8 and 16? We don't see the 'notes=F' that is generally applied when filters are skipped, but it could be due to the fact that we already have the 'notes=U' for the unindexed search on (presumably: objectClass=tsgposixaccount). And in the end, the fact that one of the components of the filter is unindexed could lead to have in the result set also entries not matching the search filter.
HTH,
marco

RowSetIterator not returning all the rows

Hi,
We have a use-case where we need to create a new row iterator to insert rows(values) in it. Immediately after insertRow(), we are reading the values by creating a secondary row set iterator (createRowSetIterator) but it is not returning all the inserted rows. Here is the code snippet:
Code to insert rows:
public void insertTerrLineOfBusiness(CreateOperation operation, TerritoryVORowImpl newTerritoryRow, TerritoryVORowImpl selectedRow){
if((operation.equals(CreateOperation.CREATE))
|| operation.equals(CreateOperation.COPY)
|| operation.equals(CreateOperation.ADD_EXISTING)){
RowIterator selTerritoryLineOfBusinessIter = selectedRow.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness();
//RowIterator newTerrLineOfBusinessIter = newTerritoryRow.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness();
ViewRowSetImpl newTerrLineOfBusinessIter = (ViewRowSetImpl) newTerritoryRow.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness();
newTerrLineOfBusinessIter.setAssociationConsistent(true);
while(selTerritoryLineOfBusinessIter.hasNext()){
TerritoryLineOfBusinessVORowImpl selTerrLineOfBusinessRow =
(TerritoryLineOfBusinessVORowImpl)selTerritoryLineOfBusinessIter.next();
TerritoryLineOfBusinessVORowImpl newTerrLineOfBusinessRow =
(TerritoryLineOfBusinessVORowImpl)newTerrLineOfBusinessIter.createRow();
newTerrLineOfBusinessRow.setTerritoryVersionId(newTerritoryRow.getTerritoryVersionId());
newTerrLineOfBusinessRow.setLobCode(selTerrLineOfBusinessRow.getLobCode());
newTerrLineOfBusinessIter.insertRow(newTerrLineOfBusinessRow);
Code to read:
public List getTerritoryLobsValues() {
List <String> lobsValues = new ArrayList<String>();
if (this.getTerritory().getCurrentRow() != null) {
TerritoryVORowImpl territoryVORowImpl =
(TerritoryVORowImpl)this.getTerritory().getCurrentRow();
if(territoryVORowImpl.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness() != null){
ViewRowSetImpl territoryLob =
(ViewRowSetImpl)territoryVORowImpl.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness();
RowSetIterator itr = territoryLob.createRowSetIterator(null);
if(itr!=null){
while(itr.hasNext()) {
Row r = itr.next();
String lobCode = (String)r.getAttribute("LobCode");
lobsValues.add(lobCode);
itr.closeRowSetIterator();
return lobsValues;
Can anybody suggest what could be the issue? How to fix it?
Thanks,
Akhila

Thanks for your response.
Jdev version:
Primary == FUSIONAPPS_PT.V1REL6INT_LINUX.X64_120719.0800 (Primary Product for the view)
Primary depends on FMWTOOLS == FMWTOOLS_11.1.1.6.0_GENERIC_120112.0037.2
FMWTOOLS depends on label == JDEVADF_11.1.1.6.0_GENERIC_111205.1733.6192.1
The above label originated from base label == JDEVADF_11.1.1.6.0_GENERIC_111205.1733.6192
Use case: We have a tree table, each record may or may not have Line of Business(LOB) associated with it. On creating a child node in the tree table, the child node copies all the attributes of parent. These attributes are not committed explicitly, if user wants to save the child node only then the attributes are committed.
Giving secondary rowSetIterator a name did not help in resolving this issue.
If I am calling postChanges() before reading from secondary row iterator then its returning all the inserted values. But this.getTransaction().postChanges() is a JAudit violation, so cannot use it:
RuleId: apps-jbo-category.File.AdfModel.54
Rule: insertTerrLineOfBusiness - Review DBTransaction.postChanges call to ensure passivation-safety
Any pointers on this?

Tabular: Row filter on USERNAME() still returns all rows if current user is NOT matched in table??

I have a table (basically the same setup in the various dynamic security in tabular blogs) where the table contains WindowsUserName stored as domain\username.
I have a Row Filter on the table: SecurityTable has a filter of =SecurityTable[WindowsUserName]=USERNAME()
When a user connects to the tabular model AND their name is matched in one of the rows they return JUST the rows with their match. Which makes sense.
However, if a user connects and their Windows user name is NOT in a row in that table....they return ALL rows???
That makes no sense to me.
It behaves almost as if it is doing a check and if it DOESN'T find a match it just returns all values.
What am I missing?
--------------EDIT-----------
Found the issue: that use was (unknown to me) a domain admin, so... admin rights trump all :)

Resolved:
User had admin rights, didn't realize this at the time.

Pagination do not have choice of returning all rows

I have apex 3.0. When report is built, I normally give pagination scheme "Row Rnages 1-15 16-30 in select list (with pagination)", Number of Rows 15, Maxium Row count 2000. Problems are
1. Can not have "all rows" as select list choice ? (OEM grid has that choice)
2. Cna not change from 15 per page to other number
Can some export help ?

Even changing number of rows will not change it. But really the question is to mix pagination and no pagination into ONE select list. I have been asked several times from users and I am puzzled about this myself.
Any expert there ?

NX-OS snmp-trap strdata does not return string sent from device to object server

NX-OS snmp-trap strdata does not return string sent from device to object server
Applet was created:
   event manage applet TEST_VPC
   description "%ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_ADMIN_DOWN"
   event syslog occurs 1 priority 4 pattern "%ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_ADMIN_DOWN"
   action 1.0 snmp-trap strdata "Loopback0 is admin down"
after event is generated (link admin down), trap is sent to snmp server, but string does not appear in received messages:
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-P_M-105-000: 1 trap in queue
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-P_M-105-000: V2/V3 trap/inform received
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Information: I-P_M-104-000: Number of items in the trap queue is 0
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] ReqId: 1427018637
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] community: xxxx
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] IPaddress: x.x.x.x
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] PeerIPaddress: x.x.x.x
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] ReceivedPort: 162
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] ReceivedTime: 1395044966
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] Protocol: UDP
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] SNMP_Version: 2
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] UpTime: 1166940388
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] Uptime: 1:30:03.88
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0: (1166940388) 135 days, 1:30:03.88
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] notify: .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.43.2.0.2
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] .1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.4.1.0: .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.43.2.0.2
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] OID1: .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.43.1.1.1.0
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] 1: (1166939868) 135 days, 1:29:58.68
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] 1_raw: (1166939868) 135 days, 1:29:58.68
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] 1_text: (1166939868) 135 days, 1:29:58.68
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] 1_hex: (1166939868) 135 days, 1:29:58.68
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.43.1.1.1.0: (1166939868) 135 days, 1:29:58.68
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] OID2: .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.43.1.1.6.1.6.36
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] 2: 4
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] 2_raw: 4
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] 2_text: 4
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] 2_hex: 4
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.43.1.1.6.1.6.36: 4
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] Node: xxx
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] PeerAddress: xxxx
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] EventCount: 360
2014-03-17T04:29:26: Debug: D-UNK-000-000: [Event Processor] Processing alert {0 remaining}
please help figure this out

This is a CISCO-CONFIG-MAN-MIB trap, not an EEM trap. I don't think your EEM applet is being triggered since you have that priority argument in there. Try removing that and leave the syslog pattern alone. You will see the string as a varbind in the trap.

Cannot get all rows from cfProcResult

We upgraded one of our servers (A) from CF 6 to 7.02. Another
server (B) has CF 7.01.
On server B (CF 7.01) the code works (below), all rows of
each dataset are returned.
Now on server A (CF 7.02) all of the resulting datasets have
only the first record in them. If I add maxrows="-1" to each of the
cfProcResult tags there is no change. If I change that to
maxrows="100" then I can get the rows up to 100.
Is this a bug or is there a different means to return all
rows?

It think its a bug. I got the same results under MX 7.0.2.
The topic of maxrows recently came up on another thread. I
did some searching and according to TechNote 18339 there was a
change with maxrow
"<cfquery maxrows=N> bug. ColdFusion MX (until ColdFusion
MX 7.0.1 CHF2) didn't pass maxrows to the underlying driver
(statement.setMaxRows())"
Given the results you're getting, it sounds like CF is
applying the maxrow to all of the resultsets, not just the one
where maxrows was declared. I suspect cfstoredproc's usage of
statement.setMaxRows() is incorrect. Thats just a guess though.
Bottom line, I think you'll need handle it manually.
Personally, I would recommend placing the row count logic in the
stored procedure (if possible). The overall results will be more
consistent and you won't have to worry about this kind of issue
again.
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_18339
http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000314.htm
http://www.remotesynthesis.com/blog/index.cfm/2006/3/23/Maxrows-Issue-in-CFQuery

Returning Multiple Rows From DBAdapter Calling PL/SQL Procedure

Oracle XE 10g Express Edition
JDeveloper 11.1.1.2.0
WebLogic Server 11g
Guys,
I have a table of orders, which I need to interrogate, and pass back any matching rows which meet certain criteria (e.g. status = 'OPEN').
However, rather than create a DBAdapter using an Operation Type of "Peform an Operation on a Table/Select", I need to use an Operation Type of "Call a Stored Procedure or Function".
I therefore need the procedure to return all the matching rows, rather than a single row.
I have looked at declaring return parameters for the procedure of the following types:
RECORD - is good because it allows me to return the elements of the row with their correct datatypes, but does not meet my needs because it will only support the return of a single row.
VARRAY - good because it can contain many row elements, but not good because it only supports a single row return, and also because all elements of the VARRAY must be of the same data type.
TABLE - good because it can contain many rows, but bad because each row can contain only two elements - the index element and the data element.
I think I could first define a RECORD (to hold a row), and then define a TABLE, with the data element being the RECORD, but I have found JDeveloper very fussy indeed when dealing with 'non-standard' data types in the DBAdapter.
Apologies if I am missing something obvious, but can anyone suggest a way of doing this?
Many thanks in advance.
Edited by: user2541290 on 17-Feb-2010 02:48

Hi, I've been able to create process that seems to work. My platform is a but different but I don't think this is important for your question.
Here is the PL/SQL code. Just make Db Adapter for Calling stored procedure and it returns all rows!
Be aware of possible limitations on how manyrows you could return in one select! This can have severe impact on performance.
Succes.
Jos Baan
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE lab2_multiple_rows IS
-- Author : 801455
-- Created : 18-2-2010 8:05:52
-- Purpose :
-- Public type declarations
TYPE rrows IS RECORD(
mutdat DATE,
opmerking VARCHAR2(20));
TYPE trows IS TABLE OF rrows INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
-- Public constant declarations
-- Public variable declarations
-- Public function and procedure declarations
FUNCTION retrows RETURN trows;
END lab2_multiple_rows;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY lab2_multiple_rows IS
-- Private type declarations
-- Private constant declarations
-- Private variable declarations
-- Function and procedure implementations
FUNCTION retrows RETURN trows IS
lrows trows;
lidx binary_integer := 1;
BEGIN
FOR rsql IN (SELECT t.* FROM jba_transactions t ORDER BY t.mutdat)
LOOP
lrows(lidx).mutdat := rsql.mutdat;
lrows(lidx).opmerking := rsql.opmerking;
lidx := lidx + 1;
END LOOP;
RETURN(lrows);
END;
BEGIN
-- Initialization
NULL;
END lab2_multiple_rows;
Edited by: Baan, Jos on 18-feb-2010 8:53

How to execute procedure returning data rows from sql plus

Hi,
I want to execute a stored procedure that returns data rows from sql plus. please let me know the syntax for the same.
Thanks,
YG

user13065317 wrote:
Even if i get the result set into the cursor, do i have to do normal fetch into all the coumn variables within a loop
But suppose no of columns in my result set varies depending on a parameter to the stored procedure.
Is there any straightforward way to retrieve all the data irrespective of no of columns in the result set.There is no such thing as a "+result set+". Oracle does not create a temporary data set in memory that contains the results of your query. What would happen if this result set is a million rows and is too large to fit into memory? Or there are a 100 clients each with a 100,000 row result set?
This is not scalable. You will be severely limited in the number and sizes of these "+result sets+" that can be created in server memory.
A cursor is in fact a "program" that is created by compiling the SQL source code that you provide. This source code is parsed and compiled into what Oracle calls an execution plan. This is nothing but a series of instructions that the cursor will execute in order to return the rows required.
Thus the result set is actually the output from a cursor (a program). Likewise, bind variables are the input parameters to this program.
All SQLs are parsed and compiled as cursors and stored in the SQL Shared Pool. Oracle gives you handle in return to use to address this cursor - bind values to it, execute it, describe the output structure returned by the cursor, and fetch the output from the cursor.
On the client side, this handle is used in different ways. In PL/SQL alone, this cursor handle can be used as an implicit cursor (you do not even see or use the cursor handle in your PL/SQL code). Or you can use a PL/SQL cursor variable. Or a DBMS_SQL cursor variable. Or a reference cursor variable.
Why so many different client structures for the very same SQL cursor handle returned by Oracle? Because to allow you, the programmer, all kinds of different features and flexibility.
The ref cursor feature is the ability to pass this cursor handle around, not only between PL/SQL code, but also from PL/SQL to the actual client process (Java. VB, SQL*Plus, TOAD, etc).
The primary thing to remember - irrespective of what the client calls this (e.g. ref cursor, SQL statement handle, etc), this all refers to the same SQL cursor in the Shared Pool. And that this SQL cursor is a program that outputs data, and not a result set in itself.

Query to return ALL rows even those with zero counts

Hi,
The following query will return only those rows that have a non zero count value:
select c.id, a.name, count(*) as XYZ from CON c, CUST a
where c.help !='1' and (c.id = a.id) group by c.id, a.name order by c.id;
The results are:
1 ME 3
3 YOU 4
What i want is to return all rows in CUST and the count, XYZ, that correspond to each row in CUST that matches the whare condition above, even if the count is zero.
ie
1 ME 3
2 WE 0
3 YOU 4
Can this be done?

You may want to get the counts then do the outer join. If you simply count with an outer join you will get 1 for 'WE' because there is a row in the cust table with 'WE'. This may work for you;
with
cust as (
   select 1 id, 'ME' name from dual union all
   select 2 id, 'YOU' name from dual union all
   select 3 id, 'WE' name from dual),
con as (
   select 1 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 1 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 1 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 2 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 2 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 2 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 2 id, '2' help from dual)
-- end of test data
select a.id, a.name, nvl(c.cnt,0) xyz
from cust a,
   (select id, help, count(*) cnt
   from con
   where help !='1'
   group by id, help) c
where a.id = c.id(+)

Business Objects is not returning all rows from Query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for