Synchronize vendors from backend to SRM

Dear Experts,
We are using BBPUPDVD transaction to Synchronize vendors from backend to SRM .
The problem is that it replicate all vendors.
We would like to do it only for specified account group.
Please advise how we can make it .
Thanks,
Moshe

Hello Moshe,
Use PREPARE_REPLICATION_DATA method from BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP BAdI.
According to your requirement, check field KTOKK from CT_LFA1 importing parameter to replicate or not vendor.
Regards.
Laurent.

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Sync Job not updating all vendors from ECC to SRM

    The vendors are updated from ECC to SRM by batch job
    Z_SUP_BAT_VENDORSYNC (object BBP_VENDOR_SYNC).
    This job is missing updation of some vendors from ECC to SRM.
    Its happening on and of.We are updating these leftout vendors manually by TCODE BBPUPDVD and new left out vendors by BBPGETVD.
    We have concluded that information in these vendors is replicated from
    ECC to SRM GUI but it is not reflecting in SRM portal.
    Reasons looks like when vendor data(Incoterms/Payment terms) is replicated from ECC to SRM an
    addition row is created in vendor data in SRM which does have this information(Tcode ;BBPMAININT).
    Though the information is present in second row in vendor data tab of vendor information when executed using TCODE BBPMAININT but Vendor information in portal is picked from 1st row and does not appear when try to shop.
    Can anyone suggest how to resolve this?

    Hi Harleen,
    The problem is because of the inconsistency in the tables BBPM_BUT_FRG0060 and BBPM_BUT_FRG0061.
    From table BUT000 take the partner guid for the problematic vendor.
    Enter the partner guid as input to the table BBPM_BUT_FRG0060  . check the number of available rows.
    Now check the table BBPM_BUT_FRG0061 with the partner guid. check the number of rows.
    You must see the inconsistent number of records in these 2 tables for the partner, like 1 row in BBPM_BUT_FRG0060  and 2 rows in BBPM_BUT_FRG0061.
    Delete the invalid row in the table BBPM_BUT_FRG0061. That should resolve the problem you are facing.
    Regards,
    Sapna

  • Mandatory fields to replicate vendor from ECC to SRM

    Hi all,
    I created a vendor in ECC with all mandatory fields. But when I tried to replicate the vendors to SRM from ECC, I am getting errors like mandatory fields are missing. Can you please tell me what are the mandatory fields in SRM when we replicate vendors from ECC to SRM. Its Urgent.
    Regards,
    Balaji.S

    Hi Balaji,
    When you create Vendors properly in ECC it should not give such an error. You have to maintain basic data, Accounting data and purchasing data. Rest all are optional.
    For replicating vendors from R/3 to SRM you should have a Vendor root org / group in SRM. BBPGETVD is used to replicate vendors to SRM by mentioning the logical system and Vendor Group ID.
    Hope this makes you clear. Please explain the error clearly for further help.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Unable to replicate one vendor from ECC to SRM

    Hi Gurus,
    We are using SRM 5.0 Classic scenario.
    We have scheduled the job to replicate the vendor masters from R/3 to EBP on daily basis and it is working fine and replicating the vendor master from R/3 to EBP without any issues for past two years. But one vendor created on few days back for the Co.Code 1089, 1089 and purchasing org 3000, this vendor is not replicated to EBP, all other vendor for the same combination are replicated.
    For this reason I manually execute the t-code BBPGETVD and I am receiving the error message as "Error in Organizational Structure; Only One Organ. Unit is Allowed per Backend P.Org Purchasing Organization: 3007 Backend: MP1CLNT100" in SLG1.
    Technical Data
    Message type__________ E (Error)
    Message class_________ BBP_VENR (Vendor Replication, Application Log)
    Message number________ 005
    Message variable 1____ Error in Organizational Structure;
    Message variable 2____ Only One Organ. Unit is Allowed per Backend POrg
    Message variable 3____ Purchasing Organisation: 3007
    Message variable 4____ Backend: MP1CLNT100
    Could you please suggest me how to fix this issue.
    Your help will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sada

    assume vendor code :- 10001 ,COMP CODE :- 1089 , P.ORG 1089 and 3000
    but why error message gives
    purch org. 3007
    for example :-
    did you extend the vendor from 1089 to 3000
    or
    created a new vendor for both purch org 1089 and 3000
    or
    There are some sap notes are available why vendors are not transfered to ecc
    two reason
    1.extend to pur.org
    2.while running sync job - vendor admin team creates a vendor master that time time stamps are ignored- sap offered a note as well

  • Reconcilation of Customer and Vendor from CRM and SRM to 0bpartner in BI

    Hi,
          I am having customer master data and vendor master data in ECC  both represents the same numbers .Ex: 10001 - customer1 and 10001 - vendor1.
    I am sending this data from ECC system to CRM and SRM system and again Iam loading this data into 0BPARTNER Infoobject in BW from CRM and SRM systems.
    In BW it is messing up, when i do a report on CRM cube it show me the vendor descriptions where i supposed to see customer descriptions .
    I can't change the ECC customer and vendor numbers since i need to change all other legacy systems depending on this .
    Can any one tell me how to fix this problem and your help is truly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Ramkumar

    Hi,
    Please check following links
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90f33e12-aeac-2a10-2186-ed8301f778ba?overridelayout=t…
    Cross company-code invoice posting and configuration - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Set_types - Replication from Backend to SRM

    Hi all SRM Gurus!
    I have this specific problem:
    Material Type FERT have been replicated to SRM. For the time of the replication the type didn't include the purchasing view, as it was not intended for purchase.
    Now the business wants to make it possible to use the FERT type for purchasing, and therefore the purchasing view has been configured and added on the R3 side. But - when I replicate the product categories, I dont get the Set_type for purchasing in COMM_HIERARCHY. I can add it manually, but this is, from my perspective, not the right way to do it.
    Can anyone help me?
    Best Regards
    Maria

    Hi
    As per my undesrtanding, Replicating Material Configuration data from R/3 does not seems to be a good approach at all.
    You need to replicate only the Product hierachies (using tcode - COMM_HIEARACHY) in SRM.
    Let me know your exact requirements behind this, why you taken this approach ?
    What type of EBP scenario you are currently into ? Which SAP Version ?
    Regards
    - Atul

  • How to send PR from backend to SRM ?

    In the backend I have customized that I want to transfer certain purchase requisitons to the srm system for the approval process. so I set up the t160ex table and t160PR table with the relevant data.
    I  have checked the used rfc connections but no shoppincarts appear in the srm system when saving a PR in the backend.
    do I miss certain steps in this scenario ?
    I have found this thread and on the srm side also implemented the badi BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI
    and had set the filter to BUS2121
    Re: Transfer SC to SRM trigger Workflow
    kind regards
    arthur
    Edited by: A. de Smidt on Nov 8, 2010 2:33 PM

    >
    Muthuraman Govindasamy wrote:
    > now your aim is to find out why EPRTRANS table dont get entry though you PR does not require any approval via ME54n and as well as EPROFILE was set.
    >
    > PR approved and EPROFILE set but no entry in EPRTRANS table
    >
    > Can you check why your PR did not get entry in EPRTRANS table.
    >
    > V_T160PR has SRM logical system entry?
    yep first aim is to find out why the eprtrans table was not  updated. I found that out now thanks to note 428116
    7. In order to be able to enter the external purchase requisitions into the transfer table, a BTE (Business Transaction Event) is to be introduced to function module BBP_EPRTRANS_MAINTAIN. For this, you have to include or change an entry in table TBE11.
          Note: You have to make the entries manually even if the note has already been implemented with a Support Package.
               Application indicator  Active   Text
               PM                    X        Maintenance
        * Afterwards, you have to add an entry with the following fields in table TBE31 for event 01000710:
               Business trans.  Event  Ctr  Appl.ind.  Function module
               01000710        PM                    BBP_EPRTRANS_MAINTAIN
          8. In order to set the purchasing profile determination, you have to maintain both view V_T160PR and view V_T160EX according to your requirements using Transaction SM30.
    In addition, the mechanism of the 'Business Transaction Events' must be activated for the 'New Dimension Integration' (NDI). To do this, carry out Transaction BF11. Then activate entry 'NDI' by selecting the checkbox. Save the change.
    so now I can continue with the srm side
    thanks for all the valuable input so far
    arthur

  • Scheduling agreement from backend to srm

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    Can I have the stepup step procedure for a backend scheduling agreement transfer to SRM.
    Means  we have a scheduling agreement in backend but the further process we have to do in SRM like schedule lines generation.
    I suppose we need to have PDP.
    Can anyone suggest?
    Reg.,
    Sridhar.

    Hi
    <b>Please go through the links below -></b>
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/17/303f412124de2be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    Re: BADI for Backend Scheduling Agreement
    try to transfer scheduling agreement in sus
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/da/151241c738f423e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/42/f9a830c2673ee2e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/42/f9a572c2673ee2e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/7d/0a093f7c392e5ae10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Scheduling agreement in SRM 5
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/38/4cc5376848616ae10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/fa/8a0d41f0faef23e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/15/c9df3b6ac34b44e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Re: Benefits SRM contracts compared to MM contracts
    Re: Transfer contracts form backend R/3 to EBP
    Error in Backend Scheduling agreement Creation
    SRM -ECC: Scheduling Agreement Failing
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Import vendors from Ecc 6.0 to SRM 7.0

    Hi experts
    i'd like to know if there is a guide or a blog where it is illustred the way to import, for the first time, vendors from R3 to SRM-EBP
    Is needed only BBPGETVD? and for the update?
    regards.
    andrea

    Hi,
    The initial load from ECC system to SRM system is done by the transaction BBPGETVD.  Here after the changes for vendor data is replicated to SRM system by the transaction BBPUPDVD.
    T-code BBPGETVD,
    a)      Specify the RFC destination of the R/3 backend in the System field
    b)      Specify the vendor number or range to be downloaded
    c)      Enter the purchasing organization
    d)      Enter the object ID - this is the object ID for the Vendor unit in the organizational structure as defined in PPOMA_BBP
    e)      Select "Transfer Only R/3 Numbers"
    f)      Click on Start Transfer
    Transaction BBPUPDVD
    In this transaction you will update vendor master data into SRM to replicate the changes, if any, from back-end ECC system.
    a)      Specify the RFC destination of the R/3 backend in the System field
    b)      Specify the vendor number or range to be updated for any changes done in the backend vendor master
    c)      Enter the purchasing organization
    d)      Enter the object ID - this is the object ID for the Vendor unit in the organizational structure as defined in PPOMA_BBP
    e)      Select "Transfer Only R/3 Numbers"
    f)      Click on Start Transfer
    Regards,
    Sheetal.

  • Vendor Transfer from ECC to SRM-EBP

    I want to transfer vendor from ECC to SRM-EBP.I tried the T code BBPGETVD. But I am getting the below log:
    "Error: Error while Creating Business Partner (BP) Module: BUPA_CREATE_FROM_DATA Vendor: 0000100011".
    Please suggest.

    Hi
    I have seen this error. However kindly check in SRM side
    In BP transaction 0000100011. Is this vendor is vailable or not.
    OR
    do some cosmetic change in this vendor in XK02 and when you run BBP_VENDOR_sync REPORT BRINGS you this vendor in SRM
    Muthu

  • Replicating vendors from SRM to ECC

    Hi All,
    We are implementing SRM 7.0 EHP1 and we have a SRM-SUS scenario.
    We have a requirement where we want to replicate the vendors from SRM to ECC.
    I know that there are standard programs and interfaces for replicating vendors from ECC to SRM, but are there any standard programs XI/PI interfaces that are available for replicating vendores from SRM to ECC?
    Please share your thoughts....
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Jack,
    Unfortunately I don't have a config guide for it. Can you speak to your XI/PI consultant and just ask him to configure this scenario in XI/PI.
    PS: Before this you should import all SRM related business content in your PI system.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Vendor Migration issue for SRM as add-on to ECC

    Hello Experts,
    I am working on SRM as add-on to ECC.
    When I am trying to migrate vendors from ECC to SRM using MDS_LOAD_COCKPIT. Within monitor, all queues are 'green' indicating that data has successfully migrated to SRM.
    But when I check vendors in trx- ppomv_bbp, i don't see any vendor being migrated from ECC. Neither the BPs are crated for these vendor masters.
    I have configured all necessary configuration- i.e.
    1) I have carried out necessary settings in tables-
    mdsv_ctrl_opt_a
    crmc_but_call_fu
    v_tbc001
    2) In addition, I have maintained backend Purchase Org in PPOMA_BBP.
    3) I have checked RFC connections, definition of logical systems and
    it seems to be alright.
    Can anybody please guide if I am missing on any config or can point
    me in right direction to investigate??
    At SRM GUI, I tried making a local vendor using 'BBPMAININT' but end up in a short-dump.
    Can you please help?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Amit

    Hi,
    if you problem is still existing, following might be possible solution. Try it.
    Maintain Table BBP_MARKETP_INFO with corresponding Vendorroot ID (ex. VG50000....) that you already created in the PPOCV_BBP trx.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards
    PM

  • Can't replicate vendors from ECC

    Hi,
    We are setting up a new EBP environment where I can't replicate vendors from ECC to SRM via BBPGETVD. In the application log I get the error message no BBP_VENR005. It says that there is an error in the PD-org structure; only one organizational unit permitted per beckend - purchase org.
    I have of course specified the backend system as well as the purchase organization.
    We have created a root and one node in the org structure of the vendors.
    Can anybody help with this issue?
    Best Regards
    Ulf Gewers

    Hi
    Did you influence any error message there BBP_VENR ?
    or Are now the vendor is available in PPOSV_BBP ?
    red or yellow in slg1.Did you select internal no range or r/3 number range.
    Are you transfering from multiple backend sytem with srm.
    Hope that your organisation is consistent with green.
    regards
    Muthu
    Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Sep 29, 2008 11:59 AM

  • Unable to transfer vendor from R/3 to SRM

    I have a problem while trying to transfer a vendor from R/3 to SRM.
    First of all, I found some information in a thread and it says something about the Sole Proprietor flag (which is in the Control view of the Vendor)
    [Re: SRM6: BBPGETVD Does not Replicate Sole Proprietors|Re: SRM6: BBPGETVD Does not Replicate Sole Proprietors]
    In the thread says that when this flag is checked then you can't transfer the vendor, because:
    "The Sole Propertiers are natural vendors who are mainly used for Tax Reporting purpose in backend system . SAP does not consider replication of sole propertiers as they do not have all master data like email id and some other details. If these kind of vendors are replciated from R/3 to SRM with the missing master data it results in inconsistency in SRM system.
    So these vendors are not considered for replication on purpose."
    So first I tried to transfer the vendor with the Sole Proprietor flag checked and this error message appeared:
    'No data records found for system <backend system>, client <client>; check entries'
    Then I tried to transfer the vendor without the Sole Proprietor and this information message appeared:
    'All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system'
    I think this second message appear because the vendor is already in the SRM system (in development).
    I checked it with txn bp to see Business Partners.
    SRM version is 6.0.
    Thanks and regards.

    Yes, I just validate that the vendor is in SRM using that table BUT000.
    First, I want to know if the second message ("All backend descriptions....") is because vendor is already in SRM or because of other reason that I don't know.
    Also, I want to know if I apply this change of the Sole Proprietor flag in Production, I mean to uncheck the flag, it will allow me to transfer the vendor from R/3 to SRM. This is my real problem.
    I hope that this message helps you to understand my issue.
    Please do not hesitate to ask me for more info about this and thank you for the quick answer.

  • SRM 5.0 - Non-replication of Blocked Vendors from R/3 to EBP

    Hi Team,
    We are using SAP SRM 5.0 for e-procurement.
    Issue:
    The R/3 vendor is transferred to SRM for creation of bidder ID for e-procurement. Presently there is no check/warning message in the system while transferring blocked vendor from R/3 to SRM using BBPGETVD.
    The blocked vendor while bidding using e-procurement portal gets a warning message that the 'User is blocked or archived'. With this warning message, the panic situation arises and the bidder gets confused while bidding.
    Solution:
    BADI BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP was implemented. The Error message u2018Vendor is blockedu2019 was given in case of block vendor of SAP R/3 not getting replicated in SAP SRM. This did not work as the message appearing during BBPGETVD was actually the original Message of Message class BBP_BUPA Message No: 030
    Original: u201CAll backend descriptions are already assigned in the systemu201D
    It was changed to: u201CVendor is already transferred or blockedu201D.
    This was tested and was working fine as the Vendor replication was being done individually and not in lots.
    The unblocked ones were getting replicated. The blocked ones and the ones that had already got replicated were throwing up the warning message: u201CVendor is already transferred or blockedu201D.
    About 5-8 Vendors both blocked and unblocked behaved as was desired. On further testing it was found that the blocked Vendors instead of throwing up the message were moving on to the next screen/stage for transferring of Vendors. On checking it was found that certain Vendors (Blocked) are appearing in an internal table and as such the required warning message is not appearing.
    We are unable to comprehend where from are these Blocked Vendors appearing in the internal table?
    Alternatively do kindly suggest if there are any other solutions for this issue by way of configuration change or some other method.
    Thanks.
    Best regards,
    Vijay

    Hello Vijay,
    Make use of the EEWB transaction for the BO vendor replication. You have an abiltiy to set your own attributes on which/what  kind of data you want to replicate into SRM from ECC.
    All the best.
    Regards,
    Mani

Maybe you are looking for