SRM 5.0 - Non-replication of Blocked Vendors from R/3 to EBP

Hi Team,
We are using SAP SRM 5.0 for e-procurement.
Issue:
The R/3 vendor is transferred to SRM for creation of bidder ID for e-procurement. Presently there is no check/warning message in the system while transferring blocked vendor from R/3 to SRM using BBPGETVD.
The blocked vendor while bidding using e-procurement portal gets a warning message that the 'User is blocked or archived'. With this warning message, the panic situation arises and the bidder gets confused while bidding.
Solution:
BADI BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP was implemented. The Error message u2018Vendor is blockedu2019 was given in case of block vendor of SAP R/3 not getting replicated in SAP SRM. This did not work as the message appearing during BBPGETVD was actually the original Message of Message class BBP_BUPA Message No: 030
Original: u201CAll backend descriptions are already assigned in the systemu201D
It was changed to: u201CVendor is already transferred or blockedu201D.
This was tested and was working fine as the Vendor replication was being done individually and not in lots.
The unblocked ones were getting replicated. The blocked ones and the ones that had already got replicated were throwing up the warning message: u201CVendor is already transferred or blockedu201D.
About 5-8 Vendors both blocked and unblocked behaved as was desired. On further testing it was found that the blocked Vendors instead of throwing up the message were moving on to the next screen/stage for transferring of Vendors. On checking it was found that certain Vendors (Blocked) are appearing in an internal table and as such the required warning message is not appearing.
We are unable to comprehend where from are these Blocked Vendors appearing in the internal table?
Alternatively do kindly suggest if there are any other solutions for this issue by way of configuration change or some other method.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vijay

Hello Vijay,
Make use of the EEWB transaction for the BO vendor replication. You have an abiltiy to set your own attributes on which/what kind of data you want to replicate into SRM from ECC.
All the best.
Regards,
Mani

Similar Messages

BU_RELNR error while transferring a vendor from EBP to SUS

Hi experts,
We have EBP on one client and SUS on abother client on the same server. SRM 5.0 and (srm server 5.5) and XI 7.0 (PI). We could succesfully import the scenario of service procurement with supplier enablement and we are going with Extended classic scenario.
All the XI settings are done properly and we could send the vendors from EBP to XI. there is a problem in the inbound XML messages when it is creating a BP in SUS. The no. ranges are maintained properly in SUS and the No. range Grouping done si fine.
01) We have an error in the SUS in the SXI monitor telling that:
We found the BU_RELNR in the table NRIV is set as external and there is no table maint. for this. We cannot uncheck external indicator.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <nr1:StandardMessageFault xmlns:nr1="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">
- <standard>
<faultText>An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredA:R1:735 -Number range interval 01 for number range object BU_RELNR incorrectly maintain. E:BBP_BUPA:060 -Error while trying to create contact person. Inform system administration Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57</faultText>
</standard>
</nr1:StandardMessageFault
02) We are not using the bidding functionality in EBP as we are going with e-sourcing. Hence, we will have to replicate vendors from R/3 to EBP. We set the standard communication as XML/XI and make as a portal vendor in EBP in manage business partners in the web transaction. Do we need to create contact persons in EBP and then transfer to SUS? Will it send an automatic mail regarding the login details to the user?
03) Or do we need to create contact persons in SUS. Will it send an e-mail to the vendors from SUS?
Thanks in advance,
DV

Alex,
The issue to which you have replied is to do with the namespace in XI mappings. The standard content seems to have a bug when it got imported into the configuration.
Coming to the e-sourcing, SAP is giving phase wise integration with ECC and SRM. The roadmap is already SAP has delivered the xi content for E-sourcing to ECC for the master data like Material masters and vendor masters. In general, E-sourcing is a hosted application till now. But, there is an exception for us to have it hosted by ourselves. There are few integration issues in this. But, it is working fine now. Only thing is you need to send the company codes, p orgs, p groups etc... 17 objects I guess before transferring the material master and vendor master from ECC to E-sourcing.
Then, e-sourcing to ECC integration for contracts push, SAP is moving towards ramp-up. This will take some time to have the GA.
Finally, e-sourcing to SRM integration, it will happen (?????????? lot of question marks) in SRM 7.0. Right now, we are planning to have a customer interface from e-sourcing to SRM.
Hope these answers your question.
Regards,
DV

Vendor replication and exchange documents from SRM to SUS (using PI)

Hi Gurus,
We are implementing scenario plan driven procurement with suppllier collaboration on SRM 7.0.
Our architecture involve:
A server machine with SRM 7.0 (SRM server and SUS components both in this machine)
A server machine with Netweaver PI 7.0
A server machine with EP 7.0
A server machine with SAP R/3 4.6C
Now we are working on vendor replication process in order to carry out vendors from R/3 to SUS (on portal enviroment) and we made following steps:
- Replication of vendor from R/3 to SRM by mean tx BBPGETVD: OK
- Replication of vendor from SRM to SUS (on portal enviroment) by mean tx BBP_SP_SUPP_INI:
In this step we put the BP (created with tx BBPGETVD) on field "Supplier" but we obtained the Message no. BBP_XP004
"No vendor allowed for vendor portal"
So we want to know, in connection with mentioned architecture, the way to perform this activity in order to replicate the suppliers in SUS.
Is possible perform activities related to exchange documents (by mean Netweaver PI) between SRM and SUS (as necessary for our implementation scenario) if these mentioned components are installed and configured on the same phisical server machine?
What is the best recommendation about installation of SRM and SUS? A unique server machine or separated server machines?
Is there any inconvenience or technical reason having SRM and SUS in the same server machine?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Horacio

Hi Nikhil,
Thanks for your soon response.
Our process involve PR and PO manual creation in MM and then PO (with ALE message type) is routed to a supplier in SUS via XI. We could achieve that steps succsesfully.
We don´t have in scope neither use SRM for sourcing nor PO creation (via IDOC) in MM.
In connection with my previous explanation; Would you say that our process is MM-SUS?.
If yes, can I follow the steps mentioned in below link described at point u201CProcess Flow Without Supplier Registrationu201D?. What´s the difference between creating and replicating bussiness partner data?.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm40/helpdata/en/c0/7a0859ee91d54aa48a69fb5d2c4089/content.htm
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Horacio

SRM@ERP: Synchronise interval of vendors (Vend-- BP) with blocked vendors

Hello all,
in SRM@ERP Szenario i am trying to synchronise an interval of vendors (Vendor --> BP) .
Synchronisation happens without any problem, but all the vendors who have been blocked with in this interval were also created as BPs in SRM with Archiv indicator.
I would like to restrict the creation of blocked Vendors at all. They are of no use in SRM for our Client.
Is there any possibility, such as Badi or Enhancement-Spot, which could be of use?
Thanks & Regards
PM

Hello Thomas,
Check methods PREPARE_REPLICATION_DATA and/or PREPARE_UPDATE_DATA from BAdI BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP.
It should be useful to not replicate R/3 blocked suppliers.
Regards.
Laurent.

Automatic Replication of Vendors from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System

Hi All,
I am searching for any existing standard configuration in SRM V 4.0 System for replicating Vendors of selected Purchasing Organizations from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System.
I have checked in the SPRO settings of SRM System and found/could make out from the documentation avalable in help itself, that there is a standard configuration by which you can automatically replicate the Vendors created in SAP R/3 by activating the following in SPRO: By putting a tick mark against the Check Box existing against "Create New Vendors also" under Vendor Synchronization with Make Global Settings I hope.
If the above statement is correct, then I hope we have to schedule a job ,since the above configuration is based on a job based execution which should run at least once a day.
In that case,which would be the relevant job which has to be created WITH A VARIANT in order to filter the Purchasing Organizations desired for.
Please help me out since we have to implement this asap.And if the above solution is not at all feasible,then please do reply at the earliest.
Awaiting for your early reply .
Regards
Annette

Hi
Please try this ->
<b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/56/54f137a5e6740ae10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/bb/6c0e3b02616a42e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/62/fb7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/5e/88ef3bc8821d0de10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
Regards
- Atul

Unable to transfer vendor from R/3 to SRM

I have a problem while trying to transfer a vendor from R/3 to SRM.
First of all, I found some information in a thread and it says something about the Sole Proprietor flag (which is in the Control view of the Vendor)
[Re: SRM6: BBPGETVD Does not Replicate Sole Proprietors|Re: SRM6: BBPGETVD Does not Replicate Sole Proprietors]
In the thread says that when this flag is checked then you can't transfer the vendor, because:
"The Sole Propertiers are natural vendors who are mainly used for Tax Reporting purpose in backend system . SAP does not consider replication of sole propertiers as they do not have all master data like email id and some other details. If these kind of vendors are replciated from R/3 to SRM with the missing master data it results in inconsistency in SRM system.
So these vendors are not considered for replication on purpose."
So first I tried to transfer the vendor with the Sole Proprietor flag checked and this error message appeared:
'No data records found for system <backend system>, client <client>; check entries'
Then I tried to transfer the vendor without the Sole Proprietor and this information message appeared:
'All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system'
I think this second message appear because the vendor is already in the SRM system (in development).
I checked it with txn bp to see Business Partners.
SRM version is 6.0.
Thanks and regards.

Yes, I just validate that the vendor is in SRM using that table BUT000.
First, I want to know if the second message ("All backend descriptions....") is because vendor is already in SRM or because of other reason that I don't know.
Also, I want to know if I apply this change of the Sole Proprietor flag in Production, I mean to uncheck the flag, it will allow me to transfer the vendor from R/3 to SRM. This is my real problem.
I hope that this message helps you to understand my issue.
Please do not hesitate to ask me for more info about this and thank you for the quick answer.

Replication Error with Vendor Master Records

Hello,
We are trying to replicate vendor master records from R/3 to SRM via BBPGETVD. When we go to SLG1, there is an error stating Business Partner XXXX: Invalid Value 0003 for field Authorization Group.
Currently, the AP dept. maintains the field Authorization Group in the Vendor Master Record 'Control' screen with a fixed value of 0003 (LFA1-BEGRU). When the replication occurs, SRM complains that this field value does not exist in a SRM customizing table or is a fixed value.
Do we need to implement the BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP BAdI to pass this value as a fixed value to replicate vendors?
-regards
Shaz Khan

I'm planning to implement bbp_transdata_prep. Wondering if either one of you can help. I've also opened another thread with my specific questions.
Replication Error with Vendor Master Records

Unable to replicate one vendor from ECC to SRM

Hi Gurus,
We are using SRM 5.0 Classic scenario.
We have scheduled the job to replicate the vendor masters from R/3 to EBP on daily basis and it is working fine and replicating the vendor master from R/3 to EBP without any issues for past two years. But one vendor created on few days back for the Co.Code 1089, 1089 and purchasing org 3000, this vendor is not replicated to EBP, all other vendor for the same combination are replicated.
For this reason I manually execute the t-code BBPGETVD and I am receiving the error message as "Error in Organizational Structure; Only One Organ. Unit is Allowed per Backend P.Org Purchasing Organization: 3007 Backend: MP1CLNT100" in SLG1.
Technical Data
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ BBP_VENR (Vendor Replication, Application Log)
Message number________ 005
Message variable 1____ Error in Organizational Structure;
Message variable 2____ Only One Organ. Unit is Allowed per Backend POrg
Message variable 3____ Purchasing Organisation: 3007
Message variable 4____ Backend: MP1CLNT100
Could you please suggest me how to fix this issue.
Your help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Sada

assume vendor code :- 10001 ,COMP CODE :- 1089 , P.ORG 1089 and 3000
but why error message gives
purch org. 3007
for example :-
did you extend the vendor from 1089 to 3000
or
created a new vendor for both purch org 1089 and 3000
or
There are some sap notes are available why vendors are not transfered to ecc
two reason
1.extend to pur.org
2.while running sync job - vendor admin team creates a vendor master that time time stamps are ignored- sap offered a note as well

How to delete a Vendor from SRM?

Hi
Can anyone guide me how to delete a Vendor from SAP SRM? I mean including at the Table level
Regards
Srujan

Hi
First you need to block in ECC and run BBPUPDVD for that
or
Please check this table BBPV_BUPA_VENMAP.
This table will consists of all vendor releated info.
Regards
Satish

Which field indicates a blocked vendor in vendor master in R3?

Hi,
Which field indicates a blocked vendor in vendor master in R3?
also in which transaction I can verify that?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Ramesh-
Edited by: Ramesh Vadamalayan on Jul 24, 2008 11:20 AM

Hi. Do you mean you want to see the blocks from SRM?
If so go to transaction BP in the GUI and look at the status tab for the central block.
For the purchasing you need to select role vendor and go to the purchasing data, if you are on SRM 4 or below.
Transaction BBPMAININT in the ITS/Portal is the best way.
Regards,
Dave.

Is it possible to creat Shoppping cart for Blocked vendor in R/3

Hello all,
is it possible to create shopping cart for blocked vendor in R/3. we are using extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0. when i am trying to do this vendor is not visible in vendor list. Am i missing somthing???
if it is not possible in standard set up...what exactly i need to do.
my requirement is that i should create shopping cart and then PO for posting block vendor in R/3 ( i know that we can do it in R/3)
how to achieve this in SRM 5.0 please guide.
Thanks
Rupesh Mundhada

There are possibly three types of blocks for a vendor in R3
1. All company code are blocked for vendor
2. Selected company code is blocked for vendor
3. Vendor if blocked for the purchasing organization
But SRM allows only Central Locking and Purchasing Organizations level locking to be replicated from R3 - MM. So If the vendor is only blocked for a selected company code it will be still possible to create the shopping cart successfully, followed by purchase order; and PO will be issued to Vendor also; but it will not be replicated until and unless the block at the selected company code level is removed.
This is not wrong; though you will be able to change them as per your business need. The reason is Selected Company Code level block is only used by finance people to stop payment to vendors because of some reasons like exceeding the limit or anything else.
Please reward points if you find it useful.

Will MM-SUS scenario work perfectly if we replicate SUS vendors from SRM

Dear Gurus'
We are going to use MM-SUS scenario in our classic implementation of SAP SRM. However, we are not replicating the SUS vendors directly from MM system using BD14.
Instead, we are replicating the SUS vendors from SRM system by ticking the 'Portal Vendor' check box in SAP SRM.
Will all MM-SUS scenario work perfectly in such cases? If I refer the configuration of MM-SUS scenario, it mentions about special configuration for transferring the confirmation key from ECC vendor master data to SUS system. How it will be taken care in SRM-SUS vendor replication?
Could you please share your experience?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

hi,
Are the Suppliers getting Time Out Errors?
are they able to create the documents ?
I have seen these sort of problems in many customers , there is one performance note created by SAP to resolve this issue.
I do not have the note number now.
But you can search the same with keyword performance along with the component areas
SRM-SUS
ans SRM-EBP-TEC-PFM.
Best would be to enquire with SAP also..

How to block vendor invoices when GR is made to stock type 2?

Hi,
I would like to get your advices on the following case:
- I need to be able to block vendor EDI invoices from payment when GR is made with 101 to stock type "2", Quality inspection. Manual blocking is not the case here but SAP should block invoices automatically in these cases. Is there any user exit available for this? Invoice blocking should be made also in the case when initial GR is made with 107 (in this case invoice is blocked by standard) and material is then released from valuated GR blocked stock with 109 to stock type "2", Quality inspection. In standard system vendor invoice is now unblocked but my customer needs to have an invoice still blocked as material is in quality inspection stock type.
Please advice.
Br,
Tapio

Hi,
Refer this post
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1488428
You will get the idea

How to display records into a non table base block..

Hi,
Can anybody help me how to display records into a non table base block....
Find below is my coding but it only display the last record in the first line
in the block.
PROCEDURE CREATE_CARTON_QUESTION IS
CURSOR car_c IS
select /*+ rule */ question_id, question_description
from WHOP.QADB_QUESTIONS
where question_category = 'Carton'
and question_active_flag = 'Y';
v_found VARCHAR2(10);
v_status boolean;
v_error      varchar2(150);
v_count number;
car_r car_c%rowtype;
begin
begin
select count(*) into v_count
from WHOP.QADB_QUESTIONS
where question_category = 'Carton'
and question_active_flag = 'Y';
     exception
     when no_data_found then
     v_count := 0;
end;
if v_count > 0 then
for car_r in car_c loop
---populating carton questions
:la_carton.carton_question_id     := car_r.question_id;
:la_carton.carton_question_answer     := 'N';
:la_carton.carton_error_details     := null;
:la_carton.attribute2          := car_r.question_description;
end loop;
end if;
end;
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jun

Hi SNatapov,
Thanks for you reply but still I get this error...
FRM-40737 Illegal restricted procedure GO_BLOCK in WHEN-VALIDATE-ITEM trigger.
Please note that I call that program unit in the last field of my control block inside when-validate-item trigger the questions should be display in la_carton block which is my non-base table block.
Find below is the code....
begin
go_block('la_carton');
first_record;
for car_r in car_c loop
---populating carton questions
:la_carton.carton_question_id := car_r.question_id;
:la_carton.carton_question_answer := 'N';
:la_carton.carton_error_details := null;
:la_carton.attribute2 := car_r.question_description;
next_record;
end loop;
end;
Hoping you can help me this problem...
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jun

Blocked vendor master (Ordering address) not considered in PO

Hi Team,
Recently we have upgraded our system to ECC6 from 4.6. After upgrade,
the system is not considering the vendor master (Ordering Address) during
Purchase Order creation if it is blocked at purchase org level under
alternate data. Whereas it was picking in 4.6 system.
Kindly provide the reason for such behavior and provide the solution if
at all we want those blocked vendor codes to be considered.
Thanks.

Hi,
Please try below SAP note for the same
Note 1609717 - Vendors with blocked purch orgs are not replicated correctly
Note 1607331 - Unassign a vendor from its Organizational unit
Regards,
Sandesh Sawant

SRM 5.0 - Non-replication of Blocked Vendors from R/3 to EBP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for