Syst allows, using both old & new tax jurisdiction codes on PO after Vertex

Hello All,
We have recent gone for Vertex implementation in our concern and have an interface with SAP.
Now , after the implementation, system allows me to use both old and new tax jurisdiction codes on POs. This will be an issue so can someone help me and let me know if any note has to be applied or any other solution.
Thanks in advance
Arun

There is difference between old and new Jurisdiction codes because as per Vertex GEO codes to SAP jurisdiction codes, there are 2 differences.
1) The first 2 characters in Vertex are the GEO numeric code (i.e. 01 = AL in SAP), and
2) There is an additional zero at the end of the jurisdiction code in SAP TTXJ table.
Example: Vertex 010030420 equals AL00304200 in SAP.
Thanks
Arun

Similar Messages

How to modify a template and use both old/new in the same library without interference

OK first Thank you for reading this and hopefully being able to help me out. I got dumped this project on my desk to update two different templates already published in
share point(2010) years ago. The original developer left the company 4 years ago. Since then anyone that tried to do anything with them made a big mess. I have done some heavy reading and am stuck on few issues.
Please note the templates were created IP 2007 and I will be using IP 2007 to modify them. The temples have a small amount of C# that does not have to be changed. There is also a digital signature linked to them.
After some heavy reading this week. I figured that I need to edit the template from Share point(2010)/IP(2007) and not copy the templates to a different location laptop/desktop
because that will ruin the digital signature. There is also a large volume of submitted forms from these temples. The new version of the temples will be heavily modified deleting rolls columns changing names. My understanding is that since I want to keep the
old submitted forms the way they are and still use the old template to open them. I would need a second version of the original template with all the visual modification to still use the original template's C# digital signatures and any other file that runs
in the background.
The plan:
1)Turn off the automatic update to forms/template when a new version of the template is created.
2) Copy the existing template (.xsn) file to a new document folder in share point(same network).
3) Change the name of the .XSN file that I copied and modify it??????????? Will keeping the same name interfere with the old template/C# digital signature ect? I would like to change to something like SameName_version_2015 for example. or will changing the
name cut the link to the old C# digital signature? or will it get modify the background files and break the old template/submitted files.
4) Publish the new template in share point.
5) Change the data connection to a new directory that I wish to submit all files.
Please advice am I missing anything? and help me understand my step 3 better. Also I would love to get a better understanding of how i can backup and recover everything. Do I simple copy unmodified .XSN files somewhere and publish them if things goes wrong?
Do I need to backup anything else?
I am open to options if I can create a test folder in the share point for safety.
Once again THANK YOU for trying to help.

Hi, thanks for the reply!
Just to follow up for what we did to disable the delete function for maintaining table records. We hided the Delete button by adding a "MODULE disable_delete" code in Screen Painter. So now only adding records to the table is allowed.
Thanks,
Jenny

Adding New Tax Jurisdiction code

I know the path in spro to add a new txjcd to TAXUSJ. However can this be done on prod or does it have to be in dev then transported. How do I only transport just the new record added in case there has been test txjcd's added to dev?
will reward help

Hi,
This should be transported from DEV.
When you create Jurisdiction code in dev, you needs to save. when you are saving it will ask for transport request and save the changes.
if you create one Jurisdiction code,transport contain only one jurisdiction code.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Rau

Change Tax Jurisdiction code (TXJCD) in Cost Center Master Data

Hi There,
We have a problem of making change to Tax Jurisdiction Code in Cost Center Master Data. We are on ECC 6.0 with Vertex system as external tax system. When we create Cost center, system automatically derive tax jurisdiction code from vertex) external system). Now Vertex have made changes to Tax Jurisdiction Code for same place based on US Gov directive. these changes are time period base say from 01/01/2008 to 06/30/2009 Tax Jurisdiction Code "TX1000" and from 07/01/2009 to 12/31/999 Tax Jurisdiction Code "TX2000" (example) When we go to change mode in Cost Center, system automatically derive the new Tax Jurisdiction Code and update the cost center with new Tax Jurisdiction Code "TX2000". When we book invoice for cost center, with back date say 06/29/2009, system through the error, that it is not a valid Tax Jurisdiction Code.
My question is; how can we maintain two different Tax Jurisdiction Code in SAP for Cost Center? From configuration stand point of view, we have maintained TXJCD as time dependent field, but still this field is grayed out and sytem populate the Tax Jurisdiction Code from external system, since we have installed vertex system for tax purpose.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Pawan Sharma

Pawan,
have you received any response on this or identified any solutions as I have also a similar request.
Thanks,

How do I set upmy Imac to allow using both my computer speakers and a Bose SoundLink system as outputs at the same time. I can use one or the other, but not both.

how do I set up my Imac to allow using both my computer speakers and a Bose SoundLink system as outputs at the same time. I can use one or the other, but not both. From systems Preferences I must select one or the other. I want both to work all the time.

Hi,
I would recommend you to use 0FI_AP_4 rather using both, particularly for many reasons -
1. DS: 0FI_AP_4 replaces DataSource 0FI_AP_3 and still uses the same extraction structure. For more details refer to the OSS note 410797.
2. You can run the 0FI_AP_4 independent of any other FI datasources like 0FI_AR_4 and 0FI_GL_4 or even 0FI_GL_14. For more details refer to the OSS note: 551044.
3. Map the 0FI_AP_4 to DSO: 0FIAP_O03 (or create a Z one as per your requirement).
4. Load the same to a InfoCube (0FIAP_C03).
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Nazeer

SYST: Tax Jurisdiction code at lowest level not transferred

Dear Experts,
I am getting the above error while Releasing the Billing document to Accounting. I have created a ZTAX - Manual Tax (for enterring VAT% manually). Created the Sales Order, Delivery and Billing. At the time of document releasing to accounting i am getting above error.
Please help.
Thanks in advance

Check this thread
Error: SYST: Tax jurisdiction code at lowest level not transferred
G. Lakshmipathi

You are not allowed to enter a tax jurisdiction code for country US

Hi All,
We are having this message popping up "You are not allowed to enter a tax jurisdiction code for country US" when we try to add an item to a shopping cart. SRM 4.0 Classic scenario.
Also when i process the shopping cart and create a PO out of it, our R/3 4.6C dosnot let me release the PO and error message is :"no tax jurisdiction code found"
I have looked at some of the earlier threads but i could not find a definite solution. Has anybody faced similar problems? Please let me know !
Thanks
Sundeep

Hi Sudeep,
How did it work? Do you have to implement any BADI's or SRM or R/3 side? As we are getting same error while creating Shopping Cart in SRM.
I have checked the plant data in R/3 and Jurisdiction code has been maintained there.
Please advise
Thank you
Ritesh

Tax Jurisdiction Code not defined for procedure TAXSE

Hello,
We are facing any issue with the error "Tax Jurisdiction Code not defined for procedure TAXSE"
We are in mid of production bill run and this is getting very critical. Any pointers would be highly appreciated.
The company code country is SE (Sweden)
We have 2 BPs with address in California, US.
The Billing is successful for both the BPs.
While invoicing, one BP is successful.
The other is going in error "Tax Jurisdiction Code not defined for procedure TAXSE".
Error Details
Jurisdiction code not defined for procedure TAXSE
Message no. FF748
Diagnosis
You have entered a jurisdiction code in a country whose calculation procedure
does not allow the entry of jurisdiction codes.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system
settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
Change your calculation procedure so that tax calculation is carried out
using the jurisdiction code.
The BP and the CA setup is exact for both the cases.
Thanks

Hi
Go to the following SPRO config-
SAP Customizing Implementation Guide-->Financial Accounting-->Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable--->Basic Functions--->Contract Accounts--->Field Modifications--->Configure Field Attributes per Activity
Select Change and double-click on field grouping Jurisdiction code.
You will get the following screen.
You have to tick the option Changes plannable and then you will be able to remove jurisdiction code from CAA2
Hope it helps..
Thanks,
Amlan

While doing MIRO i am getting an error: Enter a tax jurisdiction code

Hi,
While doing a MIRO, i am getting an error :
Enter a tax jurisdiction code
Message no. M8757
How to Resolve
Pratik

Hi
Try this
1.To enter the tax amounts of the G/L account items, choose Extras ® Tax amounts. The Tax Amounts screen appears.
You can branch to this screen at any point during document entry.
The Tax Amounts screen shows the tax amount, tax code, posting key, tax base amount, and jurisdiction code for all the items already entered. When you call up this screen after entering the G/L account items, it displays the amounts that have already been entered.
2.You can now choose how you want to enter the taxes.
The tax jurisdiction codes represent the different taxing authorities to which you submit payment for taxes EG: the state, county, city etc.
In SAP you can have as many as 4 levels. Configuration is done in 2 steps :
First step :
The tax jurisdiction structure (structure of the tax code) is set up with following menu path :
IMG >Financial accounting> Fi Accounting basic settings> tax on sales/purchases > basic settings > specify structure for tax jurisdiction code.
Alternatively you can use t-code OBCO
This step allows you the enter the character length of your various level of hierarchy within your tax jurisdiction code structure (State 2 char, county 3, city 4, etc...).
Second step:
You configure the tax jurisdiction code using the structure defined earlier, menu path :
IMG >Financial accounting> Fi Accounting basic settings> tax on sales/purchases > basic settings > define tax jurisdiction codes.
Alternatively t-code OBCP
Define your tax jurisdiction codes, EG GA0000000 for Georgia, GA001000 for Georgia, douglas county, GA001001 for georgia, douglas county, city of lithia springs.

Disable Vertex Tax Jurisdiction Code Validation & RFC Call

We want to disable calling vertex for tax jurisdiction code in some cases based on sales org & division. For a small business unit we are using SAP ECC 5.0 SD module to create customers & sales orders. These orders are placed via a external non-SAP front-end and are entered into SAP via a BAPI/RFC create customer & create sales order call. The front-end calculates all the prices and tax and passes that to SAP via the BAPI call. SAP accepts the prices & tax as-is (due to how we've configured SAP for these types of orders) and does not recalculate price or tax. However, on SAP we have external tax configured to call Vertex Q Series via Translink which we currently use to determine jurisdiction code & sales tax for other business units & for use tax. This external non-SAP front-end does not have any address validation therefore the addresses we receive are not always good (ex. they abbreviate or mis-spell cities, etc...) and therefore when saving customer or order addresses via the BAPI calls we receive errors from SAP indicating that the tax jurisdiction code can not be determined. In these cases we want to NOT call Vertex for automatic tax jurisdiction code check and allow SAP to accept a state level jurisdiction code that we can pass (ex. Minnesota's is 2400000000). How can we turn off the call to Vertex for tax jurisdiction code check? Apparently we can use SAP user exit EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001 include ZXFYTU03 but what is the ABAP code to turn this call off for specific sales org & division?
Regards,
Jeff

Hi,
You can create the custom tables with the same fields on Vertex and maintain those tables with the same values.
You can comment the section of RFC call and add your own validations.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kranthi

How to Bypass Tax Jurisdiction Code while Posting FI Document

Hello All,
   I have a requirement where I can enter Tax code along with Tax Jurisdiction for some of the cases while Posting FI Document using T code s FB01.. etc.
However for one scenario I need to BY pass the Tax Jurisdiction while posting FI Document . How to achieve this.
As per SAP once we define Tax Jurisdiction it is mandatory to enter as Input to Post the document.
But I need to control this Tax Jurisdiction as I dont want to enter while posting FI Document.It should not prompt for Tax Jurisdiction .
How to make an option field in this case (Based on Company code and Tax code combination).
Any BADI / User exit/BTE to Ignore the Error message Enter Tax Jurisdiction code).
Please help me as soon as possible.
Thanks.

My Query is , when am posting a document in FB01 Transaction , when I enter Tax code at line item level, Tax jurisdiction is mandatory if we dont enter it give an error saying that ' Please enter a Tax Jurisdiction' .
   My requirement is I would like to bypass that error without entering Tax jurisdiction I would like to proceed by providing default Tax Jurisdiction through any userexit/BADI/BTE. so that I will not get that error .
   So any USER-EXIT/BTE/BADI is there which will trigger before the error(maintain tax jurisdiction ) at line Item leve ?????
I hope now requirement is clear.

Tax Jurisdiction Code Check as part of a Sales Order Partner Function

Hi,
I have a scenario where we modify partner information directly in the sales order. These partners are simple addresses and are not tax relevant. We have set them up as one-time customers. Every time when we modify the address information, Vertex kicks in and tries to match the address information (street, city and state) with a tax jurisdiction code. In our case the address information is high level (only city and state) which is not enough for Vertex. SAP issues then a blocking error message.
We try to find a way to ignore Vertex for these specific partners. In the documentation we have found a user exit, as well as a BADI, but our developpers were not able to make it work in the sales oder.
The user-exit is the following: EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001
The BADI is the following: IF_EX_ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN
In EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001, I've found a parameter (EXEMP_IND) which could enable to bypass the tax jurisdiction code check and the RFC call to Vertex.
In IF_EX_ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN, I've found a parameter (CHECK_ADDRESS) which could potentially bypass the check as well.
Did any of you already experience this scenario or would you have an idea about how I could make this work?
Thanks
Loic

Unfortunately, the sales order is created through an interface (using iDOCs), and the external system feeding the iDOC for the sales order creation does not have any Zip Code information. Besides, even if the Zip Code is entered, it is still not enough for Vertex to choose automatically a Tax Jurisdiction Code, most of the times, it is also requiring a District, which again, will not be passed from the interface.
We went through this analysis already and we came to the conclusion that we need to bypass this check, as this partner function is not tax relevant.
Thanks,
Loic
Edited by: Loic Dominik on Jun 27, 2011 7:39 PM

Tax Jurisdiction code is not replicating from Delivery address tab to Invoi

Hi Gurus,
when i trying to change the value i.e tax jurisdiction code in the delivery address tab that value is not replicating to the Invoice tab in the transaction ME22N.
How to resolve this ???
thanks in advance.

Hi,
Make use of this BADI ME_TAX_FROM_ADDRESS in this use method GETTXJCD_
You will get the delivery address number using function modeul MM_DELIVERY_ADDRESS_TXJCD_GET
Regards,
Pravin

Tax jurisdiction code is not entered

Hi,
I am trying to clear vendor open items in F-44 it is showing error "Tax jurisdiction code was not entered" , while posting invoice or post the payment there is no field like Tax Jurisdiction code in the document. I checked in BSEG table there the tax juris code field is blank but it is not appeared in the document and checked the field status of posting key and others also the field is not there and checked in vendor master even entered the tax jurisdiction code also showing the same error.
Please help.
Thanks in advance.

I think your document contains Taxes and tax jurisdiction is enabled in your system. Tax jurisdiction key is normally maintained in your tax code if you have enabled Tax Jurisdiction applicability. Check your config. in OBCO and OBCP. Also check if you have given any jurisdiction code in the tax code used.
You can also check if Jurisdiction code is a mandatory field in the address of the vendor or customer you are trying to post. Fill the field if not already filled.
Ravi.

PO Tax Jurisdiction Code defaulted from Plant but then overwritten by CC

Hello everyone!
I had a question regarding defaulting the tax jurisdiction code. When using ME21N the tax jurisdiction code is defaulting from the value we have in the plant which is what we want. When I go and fill in the additional information that the PO needs to be saved (such as GL, Cost Center, etc.) it is overwriting the defaulted plant tax jurisdiction code and changing it to the Company Codes default jurisdiciton code. Is there a way to NOT have the company code value enter? I just want it to remain as the plant Tax jurisdcition code.
Thank you,
Rob

please read the OSS Note 501054 - FAQ: Taxes in purchasing
How is the tax jurisdiction code (tax jurisdiction code) determined in purchase orders?
Answer:
You activate the tax handling with tax jurisdiction codes in FI Customizing (transaction OBCO). In the standard system during the creation of a purchase order, the system consideres the following sources for the tax jurisdiction code: Reference item, request for quotation, contract, plant, the account assignment object. During this process, the system overwrites the respective preceding value in this list. If, for example, you have maintained a tax jurisdiction code with the account assignment object for a purchase order item, this entry "wins" as opposed to the entry in the plant table. Besides this, the tax jurisdiction code can be entered manually.
If you use the function from Note 493515, also the tax jurisdiction code from the delivery address can be taken into account (see below.).
There is more useful info in this note, as well for jurisdiction code

Syst allows, using both old & new tax jurisdiction codes on PO after Vertex

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for