System generated vs PK based OID's

Can anyone please explain me advantages and disadvantages of system generated and PK based OIDs?
Anoter question : how can I refresh invalid ROWID entries in REFs with ROWID hints?
Thank You in advance.

Hi do you know how to download oracle software, i mean I'm� treating to download the oracle 91 is like 618 MB file, it take a while, after when it is ready it is just a zip file with a size of 18 kb and if i click on it after says that the file is corrupt, it happens with all the oracle software that i treat to download. i really don't know where is my mistake, please if you know the answer, can you please sen me a mail
[email protected]
best regards
Gustavo Moros
thanks

Similar Messages

How to generat multiple invoices based on per employee/contractor/services?

Hello Experts / Dina,
I am in situation where customer is in business of body shopping and charges to his final customer based on individual invoice / per employee /contracor & customer services. This was happening in legacy system but after the implementation of Oracle Project costing and Oracle Project billing, customer is not able to generate invoices per employee services. Rather consolidated invoices are getting generated.
How to achieve this functionality in oracle project billing?
Lets take example - On Project P1 for customer ABC, 3 below employees are working on different task for 3 months.
Now after one month employees have been billed as shown below.
Emp 1 - 1000 USD - for 100 Hrs
Emp 2 - 2000 USD - for 200 Hrs
Emp 3 - 1000 USD - for 50 hrs
Now @ end of the month when invoice is getting generated is 1 invoice including 3 lines of amount total 4000 USD. There is problem; customer wants that there should be 3 different invoices per employee shoud generated based on above mentiond 3 diff lines for customer ABC.
I guess with oracle projects billing - You can split the invoice based on Accrue through date ( which is not possible in this case ) and agreement ( which is also not possible in this case ) and different currency ( which is again not possible in this case) - I may be wrong when saying it is not possible. plz correct me if I am wrong.
even I guess billing extension wont work. So is there any way to achive this?
Right now only option i am thinking is let single invoice of 4000 USD with 3 different lines should pass to AR and while priniting the invoice customer can create 3 diff prints which includes individual lines. and while applying receipts on the single invoice in the system, customer can apply the receipts to indivual lines.
but I am not sure about AUDIT issues.. Can some one think about any AUDIT issues comes to this approch or issues with TAX rounding amount issues ?
Infact I would like to solve this issue with the help of Oracle Projects billing and not with custom invoice print program. I guess someone from you experts can figure it out to generate muiltple invoice based on employees / suppliers / contractors / materials etc.
A suggestion on Extension / customization / seeded functionality of Oracle Project billing on thi issue would be gr8 help.
Please help.
Thanks
Edited by: oracle_samba on Jan 7, 2013 1:06 AM
Edited by: oracle_samba on Jan 7, 2013 1:07 AM

Hi Dina,
First of all thanks for your update :-) Your solution looks much promising.
I thought of using billing extension but rejected on the ground that I would end up in generating events based on employee for their corsponding billig amounts so finally generating a consolidated invoice only in One GDI run. But what i was missing was pre-processing extension and running the extention in loop based on employee count.
I am fully sure business would not have any issues of auto approving and releasing invoice upon generation. But my question is "is it possible to just approve the invoice & not release it using auto approve and release extension?" The reason is I think when GDI runs it only deletes Unapproved invoice & spare Approve invoices. - So please suggest.
Also please validate my understanding about your solution with an existing example -
As with the current example, there are 3 EMP presents so need to run GDI 3 times and develop pre-processing ext in a such a way that at each time it will put on hold on all the billable items except EMP1, and EMP2 and EMP3 on each consecutive run respectivly. And ensure that Auto Approve and release extension should be used in order to avoid overriding previously generated invoice? Am I right ?
Many Many thanks for solution !!!
Regards,
:-)

How to define an action which generates a pdf based on a smartform formular

Hello everybody,
I am looking for a solution to define an action which generates a pdf based on a smartform formular (my printer
is LOCL and there will be no other printers in the system defined).
With the standard print action for the smartforms formular nothing is printed on printer local.
Best regards,
Angelika

Hmm, no replies yet...
Am I in 'uncharted territory' with this issue?

Do we need to create process chain explicitly nor system generates process

Hi all,
Do we need to create process chain explicity in bpc netweaver nor the system generates it internally when we run data managment packages
thanks
Pooja

When you install BPC, there is a set of delivered process chains which are installed as well. You create the data manager packages from the BPC Excel clicent based on these process chains. You can of create custom BPC process chains in NetWeaver and create packages from those as well(for example via a How-To guide). So to answer your question, no, you do not have to create the "standard" process chains, and they are not generated by the system either, they are delivered as part of the BPC installation.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Generating a report based on two analytics(for ex:PO and PR)

I have a question regarding generating reports on two analytics.
In our scenarios,
We need to generate a report based on Purchase order and Purchase request.Is it possible in OBIA?
if yes,please provide the solution.
Thanks in advance

Hi ,
Thanks for your valuable time.
We are in designing phase of the project. we need to know ,Is there any inbuilt dashboards or reports built using both PO and PR repositories?
I would like to explain with ex:
Let's say we need a report or dashboard containing few fields from PO and few fields from PR.Let's assume both PO and PR data available at same granularity.
Do we have any such inbuilt reports or dashboard?
If not,could we customize the report generation using both PO and PS tables?
Please provide the solution.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: user3561029 on Aug 31, 2008 9:03 PM

The table name for the system generated transactions (Retained Earnings).

Hi Gurus,
I have a doubt and want to know from U experts there. Hope you won't let me down. The situation is
I have created a new chart of account in our Oracle Financial. Uploaded 2007 transactions and opened year 2008 and closed all the periods of year 2007.
When I open a new year Oracle will do internal process transfer R&L balance to Retained Earnings account and make income & expenses accounts to Zero.
I want to know the system generated entries which table they are stored, this transaction is not in Gl_Balances table.
Its an urgent plz reply back soon.
Thanks in advance
Barkat

Hello.
For EBS 11.5.10.2
Let’s suppose that the last period of you fiscal year is called ‘LAST-2008’ (not adjusting period). If you have an account with a debtor balance of 100 in this period, when you open the following fiscal year you will find an entry of 100 in the first adjustment period of the fiscal year that the ‘LAST-2008’ period belongs to, in the column BEGIN_BALANCE_DR.
It is clear that if the balance is creditor you will find it in the BEGIN_BALANCE_CR column.
Hope this helps.
Octavio

How to generate a report based on account description

Hi Experts,
How to generate the report based on account description, that means
i want to generate a report on G/L account and which account numbers are having 'CASH' description.
for Ex: G/L a/c no: 25010026-Cash and Bank balance(des)
G/L a/c no: 101000-Cash-freight
like this.
please help to do this,
good answer will be appreciated with points,
Thanks in advance
Venkat

Hi shana,
my requirement is
I have G/L account numbers, that account numbers having some descriptions, in these some descriptions are belongs to cash transactions, i want to generate the report on these cash transactions, and the report is " G/L account, debit cash, credit cash, balance".
is it possible or not,
thanks in advance,
Venkat

How to generate a Spool based on output type in SAP Script

Hi all,
Is it possible to generate a spool based on output type for a SAP Script (without explicitly trigger in Tcode VF02 and selecting output type from there )
Actually a background job will be scheduled to process output types selected in VF01 / VF02
When output type is ZABC in the background a work flow is called pdf is generated

Any suggestions please

Confusion over nested tables and system generated nested tables

Hi,
I have been reading other threads about nested tables, naming and updating them etc, but I have what seems
to me some odd behaviour.
I modified my schema to set the attribute xdb:maintainDom to be false for a collection and then registered
the schema with the generate tables option defaulted to true. The result was that I had to add xdb:tableProps
attributes specifying nested table storage at each element above the collection element, this was because Oracle
was creating tables at each level. So I have this kind of thing:
<xsd:element name="BibPt" xdb:SQLType="BIBPT_T"
xdb:defaultTable="BIBPT"
xdb:tableProps="NESTED TABLE XMLDATA.PTEES.PTEE_SEC.PTEE STORE AS NESTED_PTEE_SEC
NESTED TABLE XMLDATA.INVS.INV STORE AS NESTED_INV_BIBPT TABLESPACE BIBLIO">
<xsd:element name="Ptees" xdb:SQLType="PTEES_T" xdb:tableProps="NESTED TABLE
XMLDATA.PTEE_SEC.PTEE STORE AS NESTED_PTEE_SEC2">When I did this the nested tables were created, but when I loaded data never had anything in them. Instead
I found that nestes tables with systems generated names like "SYSNTxxxxxxxxx" has been created that contained
the data.
When I registered the schema without the tables being generated, I created a table with this syntax:
create table poc_wip2 of xmltype
xmlschema "http://www.derwent.co.uk/wpi.xsd" element "WPI"
NESTED TABLE XMLDATA."BibPt".PTEES.PTEE_SEC.PTEE STORE AS NESTED_PTEE_SEC
NESTED TABLE XMLDATA."BibPt".INVS.INV STORE AS NESTED_INV_BIBPT(Thanks to a posting by Sam Monsarrat which showed me this was possible).
Now I had my named nested tables, which contained the data after it was loaded and no system named
nested tables.
So why the difference?
In the first instance why do my named nested tables stay empty and why does the data go into system
generated tables I have no control over as regards tablespace placement?
Is it possible to have a XML schema registered that only generates tables that I have named with the defaultTable
attribute, rather than all or nothing?
And last but not least, what's the best approach for this, since I want to be able to access the data via indexes
on the nested tables.
Thanks
Pete

Hi Pete
Would you please publish the schema you are using?
Thanks,
Tobias

How do I add validation to a system-generated Selection Screen?

As HR ABAPers know, using the Logical Database approach (I'm using PNPCE) gives you a system-generated Selection Screen. Part of the specs I have for this report involves making sure that the begin and end dates for the period selected are for a two-week period. If not, I should display an error message until the user enters a period such that the period (pn-begda and pn-endda) reflect a two-week period.
The code for the validation is easy enough, and I put it in the AT SELECTION-SCREEN event. But here's the problem -- the code fires every time the user clicks the "Reporting Period" drop-down box, never giving the user a chance to specify a two-week period. It fires because pn-begda and pn-endda are still all zeroes. Even if I select "Other Period" from the drop-down list, the text boxes to allow me to specify the begin and end dates don't appear.
I've been working on this for quite a while, trying all kinds of things, but I'm spinning my wheels now. I just want that check to happen when the user clicks the Execute button on the Selection Screen, not when he/she is still trying to enter criteria. I'm thinking screen field validation for a system-generated Selection Screen has to be a pretty common thing, and there must be a good solution out there.
Any ideas?

Rich,
Absolutely beautiful -- that's exactly what I needed to learn. Thank you so much.
Rob, I thought about that. I even proposed to the users that I could default in a two-week range beginning with today, exactly as you suggested, but they didn't want that. They felt that this report would more often than not be run to reflect data from two-week periods not necessarily starting today. Still thought it was a good idea, but that's their call. _
Again, thanks Rich. Points awarded.

System generated index property not generated in database

Hi,
I created an offline table by copying it from an (first) online database to my project. The table contains a unique key constraint, which references a system generated index. Now I used this offline table to generate a table in another (second) online database. This all works well except, that the "System Generated" property of the index is "false" and not "true" as in the offline table (and the first online database). When I manually reconcile the same table to the second online database again, there is always a difference shown for this index property. When I try to continue the reconcile process to change this property I get an error message, that the index cannot be dropped because it is obviousely referenced by the unique constraint.
When I drop the constraint and try to generate the index only I get the following warning message:
Jan 11, 2012 2:08:59 PM oracle.javatools.db.property.AbstractPropertyManager processDiffs
WARNING: Unsupported property: systemGenerated
Is there a way to work around this annoying behavour? Is it possible to change this index property by an ALTER INDEX statement?
Im using JDeveloper 11.1.2.1.0 (Build JDEVADF_11.1.2.1.0_GENERIC_110907.2314.6081)
Thanks for help and hints
Thomas
Edited by: thmayr on 11.01.2012 05:08

Hi,
it might be due to some BUG in RDBMS...
First Check the Secondary index in TEST system
Look at the Transport Number in DEV system, If this is having error, then it will show you the error details also,
If that not moved Properly then you need to create another request for the INDEX and move it again
See the threads with similar problem...
Warning: Index does not exist in database system MSSQL
Index does not exist in database system ORACLE??????
Re creation of database index
Hope it will solve your problem...
<b>Reward Points if useful</b>
Thanks & Regards
ilesh 24x7

How to generate a form based on PL/SQL-procedures instead of tables?

Hi all,
I'm trying to generate a form based on a package, which has procedures for insert/update/delete/select. In Forms, this is no problem. It is unclear to me how to do this in Oracle Designer (10g). Online Help of Designer doesn't clear things up a lot, it seems I have to generate a table API and a module component API. But when I do this, these are generated as file and no definitions are created in Designer. So what do I base my block on?
Can somebody assist me in this?
Kind regards,
Ronald

Hi:
Thank you for reply to my question.
I have tried your codes and apply them the following the form. However, I always got the following error:
Error: (WWV-00000)
No conversion performed for type INTEGER, value . (WWC-49102)
No conversion performed for type INTEGER, value . (WWC-49102)
No conversion performed for type INTEGER, value . (WWC-49102)
No conversion performed for type INTEGER, value . (WWC-49102)
My codes is:
declare
request_no number;
blk varchar2(30) := 'DEFAULT';
l_url varchar2(4000);
begin
request_no := p_session.get_value_as_NuMBER(
p_block_name => blk,
p_attribute_name => 'A_WORK_REQUEST_ID');
l_url := 'portal30.wwa_app_module.link?p_arg_names=_moduleid&p_arg_values=11880470335&p_arg_names=_sessionid&p_arg_values=&p_arg_names=work_request_id&p_arg_values='||request_no;
portal30.wwa_app_module.set_target(l_url,'call');
end;
then,
I created another form which has two fields and the dattype of pk is varchar2 and change manually put the pk's p_arg_value into the url.
e.g.
l_url:='PORTAL30.wwa_app_module.link?p_arg_names=_moduleid&p_arg_values=9029417810&p_arg_names=WORK_AREA_CD&p_arg_values=APP';
portal30.wwa_app_module.set_target(l_url,'call');
However, I still get the error message as below:
Error: (WWV-00000)
No conversion performed for type INTEGER, value . (WWC-49102)
No conversion performed for type INTEGER, value . (WWC-49102)
No conversion performed for type INTEGER, value . (WWC-49102)
No conversion performed for type INTEGER, value . (WWC-49102)
No conversion performed for type INTEGER, value . (WWC-49102)
Your help would be highly appreciated.
Wei Ye

How to block changes in system generated Plan orders

Hi,
As after MRP RUN we get Planned order generated by the system, with type LP , I have a requirement that system generated plan order quanity cannot be cnhage by the user if plan order is generated for quanity 85 user should not make it 100 no quality chnages, also the manual plan order type LP cannot be create manully it should be creat by system only, and for manul other type of plan order type should be use,
How to do this.
regards,
zafar

Hi
Firming can be used when you don't want certain planned orders to change during subsequent MRP runs.
Say today you have created certain palnned orders.
In a normal scenario, when you do the MRP run again, the planned order may get changed if the requirements have changed.
However as a normal business practice, it is not desired to change the production plans everytime there is a change in the requirement...especially in the immediate future (maybe a week or so).
We set this as the planning time fence depending on the MRP type settimg in the material master, you may have firm orders.
MRP will also generate firm planned orders for materials with MRP type P1 to P4.
In addition to the above, any planned order that is manually changed is also firmed.
Hope this may help
Regards
BRSR

System generated cancellation charge but I was out...

I have a cancellation charge on my final bill that shouldn't be there.
I spoke to someone at BT and explained that I renewed then cancelled my contract straight away by email within the cooling off period as per consumer protection regulations, before deciding to move to another provider through an approved process.
He said not to worry as the letters were system generated and to get in contact again to have the charge removed if it appeared on my final bill.
It did appear on my final and I emailed to get it amended but no-one has done so, or replied to me.
I've heard there are Mods on here who can move things along a bit.
Please help!

Once the Forum Mods have read your post they will post an invite here once you reply to them they will take personal ownership of the problem until resolved
do not send them a Personal Message as this is the incorrect contact method and cannot be properly tracked also the mod contacted may not be on shift for sometime and this will delay your help
The forum mods normally reply within3/5 working days after you have contacted them
They will contact you personally by email or phone
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

System generated column names

Version - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
I see some system generated column names(like SYS_C00009_13061211:44:57$,SYS_C00033_13061211:44:57$) in ALL_TAB_COLS view for a partitioned table, not sure how they got created in the first place and tabledoesn't have any virtual columns. Is it something if we drop a column from table and oracle trying to keep them in the dictionary? when i describe the table these "SYS_C00" columns are not showing.
I am trying to exchange the partition with staging (similar structure) table, but i end up with this error "
14097. 00000 - "column type or size mismatch in ALTER TABLE EXCHANGE PARTITION"
*Cause:    The corresponding columns in the tables specified in the
           ALTER TABLE EXCHANGE PARTITION are of different type or size
*Action:   Ensure that the two tables have the same number of columns
           with the same type and size."
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
sg

I have found my solution to this problem.
My table is compressed table and when i try to drop some of the columns oracle marking them as unused(SYS_CO with timestamp) instead of dropping them. For partition exchange i have created same number of columns as original table in the same order and marked the "dropped" columns as unused on a temporary table. Now i can able to exchange the partition with out any issues
Thanks to Jonathan and Connor.
EXCHANGE PARTITION those pesky columns | Learning is not a spectator sport

System generated vs PK based OID's

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for