Tag structure for a linked TOC

What is the proper tagging structure for a linked Table of Contents and how does one create it? I can't find instructions on how to do it!! I am tagging my document on a Mac and using Adobe Acrobat Pro X. Thank you for any help you can give me!!

It sounds like you are post-processing an existing PDF to build / augment the structure tree.
In that context it might be best to take a basic approach.
Say you have:
Line 1 is: This is the TOC
Line 2 is: Chapter 1 (some text) (maybe a leader .....) (maybe a page number)
Line 3 is: 1.1 (some text for sub-section level 1) (maybe a leader .....) (maybe a page number)
Line 4 is: 1.1.1 some text for sub-section level 2) ( maybe a leader .....) (maybe a page number)
Build this in the structure tree (please, do avoid use of TORU).
n.b., "[ ]" denotes the content container (the "banker's box seen in the structure tree)
(P) tag
     (Link) tag
        [ ] objr
        [ ] (Line 1's content)
More of the same for the remaining 'Lines'
While you could make use of the grouping elements TOC and TOCI doing so manually is non-trivial.
Grouping elements are only used to group other structure elements and are not directly associated with content items.
You start with -TOC-
Children of -TOC- can be -TOCI- and/or nested -TOC- elements.
-TOCI- groups the individual members of a table of contents.
Children of -TOCI- can be:
-Lbl-
-Reference-
-NonStruct-
-P-
-TOC-
Be well...

Similar Messages

Searchable hierarchical tag structure for content

I have a large number of PDF documents, the content of which I need to analyze and categorize according to an established taxonomy. I would like to be able to do the following:
Establish a hierarchical taxonomy tagging schema.
Highlight text and images and apply tags (multiple).
Search within and across documents for tagged content. (Even a search that returns just the location of the tagged content would be helpful)
Is this possi\ble? I have Acrobat Pro X.

Thanks for the reply.
I have the "Copy files to iTunes Music folder when adding to library" disabled. So my song collection is not re-shuffled (or duplicated) by iTunes.
By having a directory structure:
Genre\Artist\Album\songs.mp3
I am able to locate and select songs (for playback in Winamp etc) in a manner convenient to me. The question is: How will I do this on the iPhone device? Will I have to create playlists of all sorts? Will be able to maintain this hierarchy on the devices?
Someone has already answered in the negative .. as nested sorting is not possible in iTunes and on the iPhone

Help me on to create a structure for Datatype

Dear XI experts,
Please suggest me how can i create the structure for creating a datatype for Sender side.
Header Information:
1) UDFString4 /
   <C88> value where C106="PICKUP"
2) UDFString1 /
   <C83> value where <C106> = u201CPICKUPu201D
3) UDFString1 /
   <C83> value where <C106> = u201CDROPOFFu201D
4) CompletedDate /
   <C97> value where <C106> = u201CDROPOFFu201D
5) CompletedDate /
   <C97> value where <C106> = u201CPICKUPu201D
etc.,,
ITEM information
1) UDFString8 /
   <C86> value where <C106> = u201CPICKUPu201D
2) Quantity /
<C95> value where <C106> = u201CPICKUPu201D
3) UDFString7 /
   <C85> value where <C106> = u201CPICKUPu201D
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Raj.

Hi,
This is the split criteria for creation a new messages
Split and matching criteria:
1)For ea. New value in xml tag <C93> a new IDoc must be created.
2)Within the XML messages two sections will be received per SAP line item xml tag <C98> will contains the link between the u201CPICKUPu201D and u201CDROPOFFu201D which must be match together in the mapping via <C106> for ea. Material number <C94>.
Here i would like to provide some of the fields for source side.
Header Information:
1) UDFString4 /
C88 value where C106="PICKUP"
2) UDFString1 /
C83 value where C106 = u201CPICKUPu201D
3) UDFString1 /
C83 value where C106 = u201CDROPOFFu201D
4) CompletedDate /
C97 value where C106 = u201CDROPOFFu201D
5) CompletedDate /
C97 value where C106 = u201CPICKUPu201D
etc.,,
ITEM information1) UDFString8 /
C86 value where C106 = u201CPICKUPu201D
2) Quantity /
C95 value where C106 = u201CPICKUPu201D
3) UDFString7 /
C85 value where C106 = u201CPICKUPu201D
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Raj.
Edited by: YeswanthRaj Kumar on Nov 3, 2008 9:39 AM

Build XML for Custom Nested Accordian (like Tree View Structure) for SharePoint List Data

Expected output in Xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <TopRoot>
- <Root id="1" Name="Department">
- <Type id="2" Name="IT">
- <SubType id="3" Name="Technology">
<SubSubType id="4" Name="Sharepoint" />
<SubSubType id="5" Name="ASP.NET" />
<SubSubType id="6" Name="HTML 5" />
</SubType>
</Type>
</Root>
</TopRoot>
List Details:
list details for storing category / sub category data and code to build tree structure for the same.
1.Create Custom List named “CategoryDetails”:
2.Create Column “Category Name” of type single line of text. Make it as required field and check Yes for Enforce Unique values.
3.Create column “Parent Category” of type lookup. under Additional Column Settings.
Get information dropdown, select “CategoryDetails”.
4.Choice column ["SRTypeName"] 1.Root,2.SRTYPE,3.SubSRTYPE, 4.SUBSUBSRTYPE
In this column dropdown, select “Category Name”:
Referance:
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/627580/Build-Tree-View-Structure-for-SharePoint-List-Data    -fine but don't want tree view just generate xml string
i just follwed above link it work perferfectly fine for building tree view but i don't want server control.
Expected Result:
My ultimate goal is to generate xml string like above format without building tree view.
I want to generate xml using web service and using xml i could convert into nested Tree View Accordian in html.
I developed some code but its not working to generate xml /string.
My modified Code:
public const string DYNAMIC_CAML_QUERY =
        "<Where><IsNull><FieldRef Name='{0}' /></IsNull></Where>";
        public const string DYNAMIC_CAML_QUERY_GET_CHILD_NODE =
        "<Where><Eq><FieldRef Name='{0}' /><Value Type='LookupMulti'>{1}</Value></Eq></Where>";
        protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
            if (!Page.IsPostBack)
             string TreeViewStr= BuildTree();
             Literal1.Text = TreeViewStr;
        StringBuilder sbRoot= new StringBuilder();
        protected string BuildTree()
            SPList TasksList;
            SPQuery objSPQuery;
            StringBuilder Query = new StringBuilder();
            SPListItemCollection objItems;
            string DisplayColumn = string.Empty;
            string Title = string.Empty;
            string[] valueArray = null;
            try
                using (SPSite site = new SPSite(SPContext.Current.Web.Url))
                    using (SPWeb web = site.OpenWeb())
                        TasksList = SPContext.Current.Web.Lists["Service"];
                        if (TasksList != null)
                            objSPQuery = new SPQuery();
                            Query.Append(String.Format(DYNAMIC_CAML_QUERY, "Parent_x0020_Service_x0020_Id"));
                            objSPQuery.Query = Query.ToString();
                            objItems = TasksList.GetItems(objSPQuery);
                            if (objItems != null && objItems.Count > 0)
                                foreach (SPListItem objItem in objItems)
                                    DisplayColumn = Convert.ToString(objItem["Title"]);
                                    Title = Convert.ToString(objItem["Title"]);
                                    int rootId=objItem["ID"].ToString();
                                    sbRoot.Append("<Root id="+rootId+"
Name="+Title+">");
                                    string SRAndSUBSRTpe = CreateTree(Title, valueArray,
null, DisplayColumn, objItem["ID"].ToString());
                                    sbRoot.Append(SRAndSUBSRTpe);
                                    SRType.Clear();//make SRType Empty
                                    strhtml.Clear();
                                SRType.Append("</Root>");
            catch (Exception ex)
                throw ex;
            return SRType.ToString();
         StringBuilder strhtml = new StringBuilder();
        private string CreateTree(string RootNode, string[] valueArray,
      List<SPListItem> objNodeCollection, string DisplayValue, string KeyValue)
            try
                strhtml.Appends(GetSRType(KeyValue, valueArray, objNodeCollection);
            catch (Exception ex)
                throw ex;
            return strhtml;
        StringBuilder SRType = new StringBuilder();
        private string GetSRType(string RootNode,
        string[] valueArray, List<SPListItem> objListItemColn)
            SPQuery objSPQuery;
            SPListItemCollection objItems = null;
            List<SPListItem> objNodeListItems = new List<SPListItem>();
            objSPQuery = new SPQuery();
            string objNodeTitle = string.Empty;
            string objLookupColumn = string.Empty;
            StringBuilder Query = new StringBuilder();
            SPList objTaskList;
            SPField spField;
            string objKeyColumn;
            string SrTypeCategory;
            try
                objTaskList = SPContext.Current.Web.Lists["Service"];
                objLookupColumn = "Parent_x0020_Service_x0020_Id";//objTreeViewControlField.ParentLookup;
                Query.Append(String.Format
                (DYNAMIC_CAML_QUERY_GET_CHILD_NODE, objLookupColumn, RootNode));
                objSPQuery.Query = Query.ToString();
                objItems = objTaskList.GetItems(objSPQuery);
                foreach (SPListItem objItem in objItems)
                    objNodeListItems.Add(objItem);
                if (objNodeListItems != null && objNodeListItems.Count > 0)
                    foreach (SPListItem objItem in objNodeListItems)
                        RootNode = Convert.ToString(objItem["Title"]);
                        objKeyColumn = Convert.ToString(objItem["ID"]);
                        objNodeTitle = Convert.ToString(objItem["Title"]);
                        SrTypeCategory= Convert.ToString(objItem["SRTypeName"]);
                       if(SrTypeCategory =="SRtYpe")
                          SRType.Append("<Type id="+objKeyColumn+" Name="+RootNode+ ">");
                         if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(objNodeTitle))
                          SRType.Append(GetSRType(objKeyColumn, valueArray, objListItemColn));
                      if(SrTypeCategory =="SRSubTYpe")
                          SRType.Append("<SRSubType id="+objKeyColumn+" Name="+RootNode+
">");
                         if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(objNodeTitle))
                          SRType.Append(GetSRType(objKeyColumn, valueArray, objListItemColn));
                      if(SrTypeCategory =="SubSubTYpe")
                          SRType.Append("<SubSubType id="+objKeyColumn+" Name="+RootNode +"
></SubSubType");
                    SRType.Append("</SubType>");
                    SRType.Append("</Type>");
            catch (Exception ex)
                throw ex;
            return SRType.ToString();
            // Call method again (recursion) to get the child items

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you want to custom action for context menu in "Site Content and Structure" in SharePoint 2010.
In "SiteManager.aspx", SharePoint use MenuItemTemplate class which represent a control that creates an item in a drop-down menu.
For example, to create or delete the ECB menu for a list item in
"Site Content and Structure", we can follow the steps below:
To add the “My Like” menu, we can add the code below:
<SharePoint:MenuItemTemplate
UseShortId=false
id="OLListItemLike"
runat="server"
Text="My Like"
ImageUrl="/_layouts/images/DelItem.gif"
ClientOnClickNavigateUrl="https://www.google.com.hk/"
/>
To remove the “Delete” menu, we can comment the code below:
<SharePoint:MenuItemTemplate
UseShortId=false
id="OLListItemDelete"
runat="server"
Text="<%$Resources:cms,SmtDelete%>"
ImageUrl="/_layouts/images/DelItem.gif"
ClientOnClickScript="%SmtObjectDeleteScript%"
/>
The result is as below:
More information:
MenuItemTemplate Class (Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls)
MenuItemTemplate.ClientOnClickScript property (Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls)
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Is it possible to modify the tag structure tree and the role map via scripting?

We use unstructured FrameMaker to produce training materials which we distribute as tagged PDF to meet accessibility requirements.
When FrameMaker creates a tagged PDF, it does a fairly good job of populating the structure based on the PDF setup information for the paragraph formats in the FrameMaker documents. However, there are some limitations in the support that FrameMaker provides. For example, almost all paragraphs are assigned to the P role even if they are headings and should be mapped to H1-H6.
We want to be able to easily post-process a PDF that has been generated from FrameMaker to fix some of the tag structure issues (including tag names and the role map) so that the PDF will provide the optimum experience for a user of the JAWS screen reader.
I spent some time reading the SDK documentation but didn't find much information about manipulating a tagged PDF via the API, especially via scripting.
Does anyone have any examples or references which explain how to do it?

AFAIK, it's not possible with a script. You might want to ask in the SDK forum, as it could be possible with a plugin.

Adding form fields breaks tag structure

I have been teaching workshops at my university on creating accessible PDF forms from MS Word. I am very familiar with PDF accessibility. For the most part, the process of field recognition, marking up tables, writing tooltips, manipulating the tag tree, etc., all goes smoothly. I have noticed something that is creating a lot more work for our people, however.
After adding forms to the tagged PDF using recognition and the Tools > Forms > Add New Field tool, we adjust the field tab order and add tooltips. Once all of that is in place and we are ready to fine tune, we click the Tools > Accessibility > Add Form Fields to Tags button. Adding Form Fields to Tags does not work consistently if you edit the tag structure manually while in the Forms creation process. You can do some tag remediation prior to entering the Forms tool, but if you edit the tag structure while in Forms, the Adding Form Fields to Tags often does nothing -- this is certainly a bug in Acrobat X but it is not hard to work around.
The larger problem is that after we click Add Form Fields to Tags button, the tag structure reveals itself to be very much distorted and extreme amounts of tag structure remediation is required. Here are three screen shots that illustrate the point.
This first image shows the on-screen appearance.
Below is the expanded tags tree, prior to adding fields to the tag structure:
The tag structure is clean and elegant. If I were to publish this, no remediation would be necessary.
And here is the tag structure after adding form fields:
What has happened is Acrobat has grabbed recognized form fields and other elements in the document and has jammed them into the tag structure. Other things are affected as well. For example, headings in the page have extra, redundant textruns in them.
This has radically negatively affected the tag structure, requiring the author to do lots of remediation.
Any recommendations? solutions? similar experiences?
It seems obvious to me that this is a flaw in Acrobat that needs to be addressed, if accessibility is a goal. Or perhaps I'm doing something wrong??

Hi Daver1111,
Nope. No answer and nothing from Adobe.
I know something is going really really wrong, too: We have a product called CommonLook. It's an enterprise-level PDF accessibility remediation tool. It works well in fixing most structural problems in PDF through a relatively easy to use interface--you just drag textruns and elements around. It also has some tools that automate cleanup for accessibility.
I have no problem using this tool 99% of the time, but when I use it on forms I have made in Acrobat, the CommonLook plugin hangs when I try to save the PDF. It identifies a "structural error" in the PDF and crashes, leaving the PDF unchanged.
You can change the PDF in Acrobat by spending time moving around and creating new elements and deleting extra textruns and such, but, wow, what a royal pain in the *** that is!
Since no one is from Adobe is responding, I'm going to file a bug report.
Cheers,
ken

Source of xslt mapping and XSD/ XMT target structures for standard Idocs

Hi,
I am working on R/3 - XI - ICH scenario. I need xslt mapping and XSD/ XML target structures for standard IDoc like PROACT01,DELFOR01, DELVRY03. I tried to search it on marketplace but couldn't find it there. As per configuration document, these things are shipped with XI mapping content in live cache CD. But I don't have this CD with me. Can anybody tell me the source for these target structures and mapping program. ( Please share marketplace, site link or send me across the mail [email protected])
Thank you in advance.
Anand More.

Anand the other option is to import the corresponding idocs into your integration repository and then you can view the generated XSD there.
As regards XSLT mapping, you need to basically first identify as to what form you want to transform your source idoc into.
For some help on XSLT mapping check the following threads,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/collaboration.sdn?contenttype=url&content=https%3A//forums.sdn.sap.com/topusers.jspa%3FforumID%3D44
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/collaboration.sdn?node=linkFnode1-6&contenttype=url&content=https://Process Integration (PI) & SOA Middleware
Also have a look at my code samples,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/xi-code-samples/generic xslt mapping in sap xi, part i.pdf
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9692eb84-0601-0010-5ca0-923b4fb8674a
cheers
Sameer

Multiple STATEMENT nodes in target structure for JDBC adapter

Hi All,
I have a file to JDBC scenario . At the receiver side we need to update two tables simultaneously .
So in the target structure for JDBC , is it possible to have two STATEMENT nodes , so that 2 tables can be updated simultaneously.
Please help.
Thanks & Regards,
Loveena.

Hi,
U can do tht..please see below link..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/Helpdata/EN/bc/bb79d6061007419a081e58cbeaaf28/frameset.htm
Regards,
Manisha

New desktop has wrong path for page links in nav bar

I created a new desktop and have the following problem. The image links to portal
pages in the horizontal nav bar in the top have wrong path.
Example.
In the original portal the home page link in the nav bar has a image associated
with it in workshop.
\framework\skin\classic\images\home.gif
The partial url generated for the image looks liek this:
\mywebapp\\framework\skin\classic\images\home.gif.
I created a new desktop everything works fine except for the images. The href's
are created for the links but the image path is wrong.
the url generated is : \mywebapp\appmanager\framework\skin\classic\images\home.gif
The "appmanager" in the path causes the problem.
Is this a bug?

Hi Subbu,
I used workshop page properties to associate the image to the page.
framework/skins/classic/images/home.gif
- Shankar
Subbu Allamaraju <[email protected]> wrote:
Shankar,
Did you use any tag to create the img tag? Do you have any sample
HTML/JSP snippet?
Subbu
Shankar Bala wrote:
I created a new desktop and have the following problem. The imagelinks to portal
pages in the horizontal nav bar in the top have wrong path.
Example.
In the original portal the home page link in the nav bar has a imageassociated
with it in workshop.
\framework\skin\classic\images\home.gif
The partial url generated for the image looks liek this:
\mywebapp\\framework\skin\classic\images\home.gif.
I created a new desktop everything works fine except for the images.The href's
are created for the links but the image path is wrong.
the url generated is : \mywebapp\appmanager\framework\skin\classic\images\home.gif
The "appmanager" in the path causes the problem.
Is this a bug?

Data structure for web-based discussion forum

Hello all. I have begun work on a discussion board forum but have not yet decided upon a data structure for the hierarchy of messages to be left on a board. Any one have any thoughts or experience in this matter? My first thought was to implement a basic linked list in which every reply to a message would be a new child of a node. This would require I use recursion in some areas for counting and finding messages but I was also thinking that this way I can store each thread object in a simple fashion using serialization.
SJ

THE STANDARS DIRECTORY STRUCTURE IS :-
PROJECT FOLDER
|
|---------->WEB-INF
|------> web.xml file
|-------> classes (folder to keep java files)
|-------> lib (folder to keep jar files)

Organization structure for Case study .... need yr advice

Hi I am in process of preparing an org structure for one of the company.
The company operations is like .
The company has four factories in different locations and have 3 Regional distribution centers (RDC) across india. Each distribution center has 5 branches (Sales Offices), in this way they 15 Sales offices across India.
Most of the materials are procured by factories independently while some materials are centrally procured. Factories produce Finish goods and they are either sale to customer directly ( big regular customers) , or transferred to RDC to cater the requirements of other MID size customers and the other possibility to transfer it to Branches for Retail customers. RDCs also transfer FG to Branches.
All factories , RDC and branches have warehouse facility , however branches have limited warehouse facility as the customers supported by them are very few and generally deliveries are made directly from RDC / Factory.
They also have one R&D department in another location to develop new products and material is generally transferred from factories to R&D department.They also have one project division at the same (R&D) location which handles commissioning of new plants and procurement of capital goods.
Raw Material , Semi finish and FG are transferred between factories and FG material is also transferred between RDCs.
The group also has another Company which produces another line of products. RDCs and Branches of first company also work for second company (which means same RDC can store FG produced by both companies) and also Branches can also have FG material of both companies. Second company doesnt have any specific R&D or capital division and R&D and capital of first company also work for second company.
Inter company transfer between both companies is a regular practice.
> Proposed Org structure
Company Group Company
Company Code First company and Second company
Factory Configurations
For first company
4 Factories will be 4 plants
Factories Structure (Storage locations / warehouses and storage type)
Since factories have different type of material ( like FG , Raw material , WIP ) therefore I am confused what option I should select
1) 3 storage location ( for each plant) and one warehouse, 1 storage type
2) 1 storage location and three warehouses (I think this is not possible in SAP , not sure ?? )
3) 1 storage location , 1 warehouse and 3 storage types
RDC structure
RDCs have full fledged warehouse facility and therefore thinking of making them also as Plant. Every RDC will have 6 Storage locations , 1 for First company RDC itself, 5 for associated branches and I feel each RDC storage locations should be a associated to a separate warehouse also.
( Since both companies produce different set of products therefore they will have different material and hence thinking of handling products of both companies in same plant and same storage location and warehouse , may be two storage type/area can be defined to differentiate material of both companies.)
Branches: Will be storage locations under RDC ..
While making branches as Storage location . I have another question about valuation , since material from Plant and RDC is being transferred to Branches and from there it is distributed to customers therefore the valuation of FG at BRANCH and RDC should be different as transportation cost , packing , unpacking etc cost should get added at Branch level.
Therefore in case I make branch as Storage location , I will miss the valuation part while if I make them as Plant then there will be lot of documents get generated for each movement. Hence not sure for what option I should go.
R&D:
Since R& D department is involved in testing in New Product development and generally material is required to be scrapped after testing therefore thinking of making it as Plant with one storage location and may be here I dont need any warehouse (WM) here.
Project Division
Project division may also be a separate plant with one storage location and NO WAREHOUSE is required to linked with it.
Purchase Organizations
4 purchase organizations for each plant respectively and 1 centralized purchase Org for central procurement.
Your all valuable inputs are welcome .... looking foward to have a best possible configuration for above mentioned case study.
Regards

Phew... long long question
The rule I generally follow is that the org structure should map reality.
Company code - where Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss are prepared at the end of the year. If an entity does not do this, it is not a company code.
Plant
1) Each manufacturing facility is a plant (could be in 1 location or separate).
2) Each separate location is a plant (even if it only stores goods). May be an overkill, but helps when legal requirements change or the location is upgraded.
So in your case, RDC will be a plant (may be more than 1 if necessary). R&D should be a separate plant without warehouse management
Storage location
The only rule I follow is that there should not be any overlap of storage locations. So physically, any area of say 1 square foot should belong to one and only one storage location. Otherwise there is a lot of confusion during physical inventory. So logical locations are a no-no.
I usually use a lot of storage locations.
Don't have a warehouse spanning multiple plants (even though it is allowed).
Purchasing organizations
Have one for each location of purchase. If there is a team sitting in each plant procuring for only that plant, have it as a separate purchasing org (not strictly necessary, but makes authorization simple). For central purchasing, a central purchasing org should do nicely...
Hope this helps,
Lakshman

Mail.app: non-parallel structure for incoming versus outgoing servers

Manual setup of POP accounts has a non-parallel structure for incoming versus outgoing servers.
To review: for each account you must enter setup data for a single POP (incoming) server, but you are offered multiple choices for SMTP (outgoing) servers, and Mail.app supports sharing a single SMTP server setup among multiple accounts.
Why?
Why not just offer distinct setups for each account in each direction?   There must be a good reason for all this extra structure…. yes?
More specifically: What are implications for multiple accounts, e.g.
      [email protected]
      [email protected]
using the same outgoing server?   It seems to me that Mail.app encourages you use a single SMTP server setup for both, am I correct?    But this seems to undermine proper security. I think each account should uses its own credentials for both incoming and outgoing, yes?
In Mail.app V8.2, shipped with MacOS 10.10.2, Mail.app offers an opportunity to set up a second distinct SMTP server (in the above example, for [email protected]) but the text boxes for username and password refuse to accept text. Is this just my experience, a local problem? Or is it observed by others? If so… a new way of enforcing sharing of SMTP setups, or a bug?
I'm very curious about the long-term Mail.app design philosophy in this regard, but this is not just curiosity: I'm having trouble with multiple email accounts after upgrading to 10.10.2 In each case, when I try to set up multiple accounts on a single mail server.
I've done quite a bit of searching for explanations of mail.app's design, without success. It is very possible I've missed some relevant explanations. If so, please provide links and accept my apologies.
TIA

Manual setup of POP accounts has a non-parallel structure for incoming versus outgoing servers.
To review: for each account you must enter setup data for a single POP (incoming) server, but you are offered multiple choices for SMTP (outgoing) servers, and Mail.app supports sharing a single SMTP server setup among multiple accounts.
Why?
Why not just offer distinct setups for each account in each direction?   There must be a good reason for all this extra structure…. yes?
More specifically: What are implications for multiple accounts, e.g.
      [email protected]
      [email protected]
using the same outgoing server?   It seems to me that Mail.app encourages you use a single SMTP server setup for both, am I correct?    But this seems to undermine proper security. I think each account should uses its own credentials for both incoming and outgoing, yes?
In Mail.app V8.2, shipped with MacOS 10.10.2, Mail.app offers an opportunity to set up a second distinct SMTP server (in the above example, for [email protected]) but the text boxes for username and password refuse to accept text. Is this just my experience, a local problem? Or is it observed by others? If so… a new way of enforcing sharing of SMTP setups, or a bug?
I'm very curious about the long-term Mail.app design philosophy in this regard, but this is not just curiosity: I'm having trouble with multiple email accounts after upgrading to 10.10.2 In each case, when I try to set up multiple accounts on a single mail server.
I've done quite a bit of searching for explanations of mail.app's design, without success. It is very possible I've missed some relevant explanations. If so, please provide links and accept my apologies.
TIA

Maintain Screen for Object Link - New Object

Hi
We want to create new object link ( not standard SAP) in our company.
I try to add new screen for link other SAP object : SE80 ---> Package : CV --->
Function Group : CV130 , add new screen . It seems as REPAIR , Ask me for access key .
Is it OK?
Help Activities:
f the screen entry contains errors or you want to add a new entry you
an check the existing screen sas follows:
   Start a second mode and execute the following steps:
   -   Start the Object Navigator.
   -   Display the objects for development class CV
   -   Expand the function group 130
       The structure notes screens lists all screens that can be used
       for an object link
   -   Find the screen for the object link (such as 1201 for material
       link).
   Process the activity Maintain screen for object link in the first
   mode.
   -   Correct the entry or add an entry for the the object you want to
       add to the document link.
Thanks, Meira.

Hi Dave,
First of all you didn't mention which version you are using and Which Real Estate you are on. there are 2 RE
1. Classic Real Estate (Real Estate)
2. Flexible Real Estate Management
Now coming to Question
for Flexible Real Estate Mangement the path is
SPRO---->Flexible Real Estate Mangement (RE-FLX) -
>General Setting for Master and contract -
>
Document Mangement -
>Document Mangement System -
>Maintain Screen for Object Link
The above path is for ECC 6.0
Thanks
Veman.

Creating structure for FIAR_C03 cube reports.

Hi,
I want to create structure for report in 0FIAR_C03 cube. of which requirement is as follows.
-          Analysis of how old AR items are in days (key date for reporting minus the net due date),
-          what the balance of the open items are (USD and local currency),
-          Reporting by the country of the end customer,
-          GL restriction. We only want AR trade items, not intercompany.
-          Drilldown to FI document number and line number.

hi,
did u chk the standard bi content queries..chk the below link..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d6/dbec8914ec6c4686cd9d078093c930/frameset.htm
hope it helps...

Pa allocation structure for pm orders

hi fico experts,
can any one tell us how to configure the pa allocation structure for pm orders for revenues billing thru dip profile use for service orders.
pl help
thanx in advance
regards
srihari

hi
I need to post to COPA at the time of settlement of PM order thru KO88 with multiple order line items in PM order.
to clarify further,
Currently I am able to do settlement to cost center as per settlement rule in pm order with one order line item, when i have 2nd line item in same order, we are not able to do settlement thru ko88 because this has been linked to dip profile.
pl revert if u need more info
thanks in advance
regards
srihari

Tag structure for a linked TOC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for