Tax amout difference

Dear Expert's
i have the following issue reg calculating the VAT tax amout
1.invoice
Dr: CUSTOMER         1000
Cr: SALES REVENUE 909.09
Cr     SUSPENSE VAT 91.91
2.Payment
Dr: BANK   1000
    SUSPENSE VAT 100 (should be 91.91)
   Cr: CUSTOMER 1000
       ACUTUAL VAT 100 (should be 91.91)
Plz help me in this issue
Reg
kris

Hi,
check whether the tax rounding off is being configured in the system,
Regards,
Sridevi
*Pls. assign points, if useful
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/sridevi+pattabiraman">me!</a>

Similar Messages

Tax value difference in FI document & report S_ALR_87012357

Hi Team
There is tax value difference in FI document and report S_ALR_87012357.why this difference come?
In FI Document GST input value S$414.89
In Report GST input value : S$3,599.34
Why these difference coming ? Please suggest..
Thank you
Regard,
Dharma.

HI ,
Its looks like thata document is posted in SGD which looks like document currency . VAT report if you haven't choose any currency then run in local currency . Its look like that which is different from SGD .
Can you Please click on TAx in document .
Many Thanks

There is a tax code difference between PO and MIRO

There is a tax code difference Between PO and MIRO.tax code is VO in PO but it must be T8 becuase invoice is T8.can you please solve this issue ?
Thanks & Regards
Raj

Hi
Put the Tax code same in PO and MIRO, because In F-47 you have to give the PO no in it. Then create MIGO, Then F-48 and then create MIRO, and Then F-54 Then F-58.
Thanks
Anil

Tolerance for Tax Amount difference

Dear All,
In certain cases the tax amount given in the invoice is different from the tax calculated by the system.
Please help me, where to make the configuration so as to accept a difference of 0.05 INR between the calculated tax amount and the tax amount in the invoice. (It will be of immense help if given with the IMG path too).
As an example:
Base Amount: 100, Tax Rate: 5%
Now calculated tax amount is 5
But tax amount in the invoice has come as 5.04.
Please advise.
Regards
B.Mohanty

Hi Umesh,
Thank you very much for your kind and quick response.
Yes, I have tried that option of correcting the tax amount. But am getting an message
"The system checks the tax amounts for each code on document level. However, the amounts entered deviate more from the amounts calculated (using the percentage rates defined in tax code) than is allowed considering rounding errors".
Can you please advise what does this rounding errors mean.
Regards
B.Mohanty

Italian tax reports - differences from SAP version 4.71 to 4.72

Hi,
Does anybody have the knowledge or documentation regarding the main differences between version 4.71 and version 4.72 from Insurance, regarding the Italian taxes report?
Thanks
Cristina

better to raise this issue to SAP itself otherwise wait for posts who comes across this issue.
Regards
Prabhu

SAP B1 - Witholding Tax Rounding Difference

Hi all,
Is there a way to turn off rounding difference for Withholding Tax? There isn't any rounding at Withholding Tax Table but the AP Invoice displayed the value with rounding.
Tried the setting at Administration > Setup > financial > Currencies > Set the currency to no rounding. But, the result is still the same.

Actually, I don't prefer a rounding. Is there a way to turn it off? The case that I encountered when the base amount of an AP invoice is 7360 with 3% witholding tax. The Withholding tax amount in Withholding Tax table show 220.80 but when back to AP Invoice document, it was round up to 221.00. I want the amount to reflect what is calculated in Witholding Tax Table as 220.80.
Please advise what could be the solution. Thanks.

Tax value difference...urgent..

Hi guru's
I created 1 PO with Tax code as 18 (12.5% RM Deductible).
In print priview it is showing 12.5% deductible & 4% non deductible..
But in PO item details - invoice column- Taxes -- it is showing only 12.5% deductible..
please send me solution ..Urgent
Thanks
sap-mm

Hi
Ask your Abaper to check the program from where it is picking the percentages.I suspect it may be picking from tax code,Cross check the tax code again in FTXP.
Regds

Tax amount difference in Invoice verification (MIRO) and PO

Hi Experts,
I create a PO of say 10000/- and 2% tax so the total po value is 10020/-. It is calculating correctly. But while doing the GR the GR/IR value is less say 8500/- .I don't no the reason it is picking the wrong value.The price control in material master is 'V'. While doing the MIRO the amount is coming 10000 but tax calculation is 25/- instead of 20. What may be the possible reasons for this ? Please help.
Thanks
Arun

Hi Arun
If ur material has Std price in material master accounting view then that price will get updated in GRN instead f the price in PO thru info record.
Check that.
Also is ur tax procedure is TAXINJ or TAXINN.
In MIRO click on simulate and check what is the G/L that causes extra amount and let us know from which we cn help u better.
Reg
Raja

Invoice Tax amount difference than GR tax amount

Hi experts,
I got one issue from client the GR amount is 552873.75, and tax is93,988.54
and they got invoice from vendor showing amount 552873.75 and tax is93,988.50
when the user was trying to make the invoice verification he was trying to put 93,988.50
then mess were getting tax amount not correct 93,988.50(correct is93,988.54
we can resolve this by doing like this
we can make invoice verification as per GR amount and then balance we post through FB41.
IF IT is not right please let me know
Thanks
JC

Hi joshi,
what you have told is right we can deactivate check box in ftxp tax code then we can able to make invoice i know.
but only for one document we cant do it right there will be impact on other documents also.
please let me know is there any alternative solution.
Regards
JC
Edited by: c naidu on Jan 5, 2010 4:44 AM

Tax amt difference in PO and MIRO

Hi SAP Gurus,
We are using TAXINJ.
During Invoice Verification for some of the POs, the Excise duty amout differece from that of the PO.
Unable to understand from where exhactly system is picking up this new value for excise duty.
Please help,
-rajan

Thank you Pankaj and Durga for your reply.
Yes, While making GR, and hence capturing Excise invoice, the Basic Excise duty, Education Cess and HECess amount has been changed.
Now, during Invoice Verification (MIRO), system is picking up the updated (new) value of Basic Excise duty, this is correct.
But the amount of Education Cess and HECess is not taken as per amount posted in Excise invoice, but system is calculating it as 2% and 1% based on new BED, this is not correct amount.
What can be done so that for MIRO, system shoud pick up only amount entered in Excise invice and it should not calculate.
Please help,
Rajan

Dunning Wizard - Withholding Tax

Hi All,
SBO 2007 SP1 PL 07 or SBO 8.8 SP0 PL 11
The Dunning Wizard doesn't work for the A/R Invoice having the withholdin tax.
It includes the withholding tax in the amount to have. This is wrong!
Have you any idea how to fix this?
Simona
Edited by: Simona Bossi on May 26, 2010 11:19 AM

Hi Sekar,
I Reproduced the same scenario till delivery and used Doc. Gen wiz as target document as A/R Invoice it worked fine.
Settings BP and Item both we set to Witholiding tax Liable. The Invoice had withholdig tax amout added generated by the DGW.
Could you check in for the list of BP in DGW (Document generation wizard)
Business Partner --> Accounting tab --> Tax sub-tab --> WT taxes allowed and check if you have one WT checked.
Let meknow if this works.
Regards,
Rakesh

ECC 6.0 Error : Tax code PA also exists.

Dear Gurus,
We have recently encountered the error in ECC 6.0 during the invoice
in which we did not encounter in 4.6C.
<b>ECC 6.0:</b>
We have created a PO with tax Code as "II". When we do invoice for this
PO using Tcode: MIRO, tax code "PA" is populated in invoice header from
the configuration & tax code "II" is populated in invoice item from PO.
When we try to post the invoice we encounter the error stating that
"Tax code PA also exists".
4.6C:
In 4.6C we can be able to post the invoice without any error for the
above mentioned scenario.Then we wrote this issue to OSS asking them help to resolve this issue.
SAP said that,
Behavior of system in ECC 6.0: is correct and they asked us to refer the following
attached note which explains the same that system should throw the
message FF812 if header tax code is not present in any line item.
371633 MIRO: Error message FF812
Regarding the behaviour in 4.6C in, this is due to missing of following attached note.754074 MIRO: Missing error message FF812
After the answer from SAP we concluded the following:
(1). Behavior of system in ECC 6.0 is correct, I mean triggering the error when the
tax code difference in header and item.
(2). Behaviour of system in 4.6C is wrong, since we missed out to implement the
OSS note.That's why it does not trigger any error message.
<b>
Question:</b>
(1). Now the users encounter error in ECC 6.0 when they post the invoice, b'cas the header and item tax code is difference.
What is the best to way to overcome this issue.I mean without error how to post the invoice?..Your earliest help will be greatly appreciateble.
Thanks.
Cheerios
Thamarai Kannan MK

Hello, I know it's and old question, but I'm facing the same problem. Did you solve it ??
Thanks in advance,
María

MM Pricing procedure VS Tax procedure

Hi Gurus,
I have checked many thread here , but still can not find the answer.
Tax calculation procedure basically calculate the tax amount based on condition recaord maintained
(dor tis corresponding Condition type).
But we also can maintain Condition record for the condition type NAVS (pricing procedure) that bring tax amout into the pricing procedure of PO).
My question is why do we have to maintain Tax procedure as well as pricing procedure (regarding tax of course ).
Cheers Guys
Julien

HI
Basically why we have taxing procedure is that its always country specific that means it can be any vendor selling any material but he has to follow some government regualations whcih is what will be given in the taxing procedure that sholuld be the same for all customers it will be different if the customer is foreign.
the pricing procedure is where we carry out pricing that is customer specific here we can have different prices for different customers depending on what he buys and ETC.
hope this clarifies .
Regards
Vignesh

Tax on Monetary & Non-Monetary Perquisites (Payroll-India)

I need one help for FBT perk & tax calculation process.
There are no. of benefits which are in terms of Monetary & Non-Monetary form. All non-Monetary item’s tax is bear by the employee. Whereas the monetary benefits attract some tax on the basis of which they are giving some allowance to employee which balances the tax bear by employee. Giving one example below.
For ex. Total Tax on Income say A
Monetary Perk-B
Non-Monetary Perk Say C
The sum of the three Say D. Then they calculate tax on D & take the difference between D & A to arrive at tax on perk.
This tax then divide in such way:
Employer Tax= X (Difference between D & A)*C/B+C –to display on form 16
Rest will be employee tax but they give this amount as special perquisite allowance to employee & the calculation is as follows:
SPA= X (Difference between D & A)* B/B+C
Is there any standard functionality in SAP Payroll-India to suffice this requirement. Pl. guide me how to address this scenario.

can you come up with numbers ? and little clear to better understanding.

S_P00_07000136 Transfer deffered tax Thailand

Hello All,
I am trying to transfer tax amount using S_P00_07000136. When i enter the amount on tax amount difference manually. i am getting a error message which says
"Actual Tax difference 10,00- exceed the tolerance limit "1,00 1,00"" . I am not able to find which tollerance limit this setting is talking about.
Please provide ans
Thanks & regards
Naveen Rana

Naveen,
I am facing exact same issue for Thailand. For the relevant vendor, the Tol Group is CGEN where I already setup the limits under "Permitted payment difference". This is OBA3 which you said teh issue is. Can you explain what exactly is teh issue here and what needs to be corrected?
Aprpreciate your help....
Sujoy

Tax amout difference

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for