Tax condition in quotation

hi all,
can u please explain me i have to maintaion tax condition in quotation maintenance
in $ sign only discount related condition are avl
where should i maintain tax related conditions
regards,
sujit

go to rfq
select the line and press F2
put the tax code
item -- more function -- tax
u will be able to c the tax
if u r using taxinj taxs will come as per tax code
and if u r using taxinn then tax will come based on condition record u maintain for condition type
in FV11
hope this solveds ur issue
reward if usefull

Similar Messages

  • Tax Conditions types not appearing in CRM orders and quotations

    Hello All,
    I have created a new tax condition type in ECC and through initial load replicate the same to CRM. pricing procedure repliction with new tax condition is also successful.
    But, the new tax condition is not appearing in condition tab at item level when i create quotation in CRM. other condition types are coming. data for this condition type is there in custom condition table. mapping of tax classifiction to tax group is also done in SPRO.
    Please advise.
    THank and Regards
    Sudhir Grover

    Hello Sudhir,
    You should check the trace log for pricing at first. Set the user parameter:PRC_TRACE as 'X' on T-cd:SU01 for your user and check the Access analysis on the condition tab.
    Regards,
    Masayuki

  • Wrong Tax Code in Quotation

    Hi All,
    SAP uses condition type ( MWVS -input tax) as the basis of a calculation procedure- TAXAT, which enables integration between the  MM and FI module.
    Step 1:
    Step      Control     CType     Description   From      To
    100     0     BASB     Base Amount                     0     0               
    110     0     MWAS     Output Tax                    100     0          MWS
    120     0     MWVS     Input tax                     100     0          VST
    125     0     YWVS     Foreign Input tax     100     0          YST
    140     0     MWVN     Non-deduct.Input Tax     100     0          NAV
    150     0     MWVZ     Non-deduct.Input Tax     100     0          NVV
    200     0     NLXA     Acquisition Tax Cred     100     0          ESA
    210     0     NLXV     Acquisition Tax Deb.     100     0          ESE
    Step 2:
    Condition Record is created for Condition Type -MWVS Input tax based on Country/Tax Code .
    Here we have different tax codes maintained for AT country.
    Step 3:
    Create RFQ(ME41) :
    Create Quotation( ME47): Tax code is appearing automatically here.
    This tax code is wrong and I would like to know from where does the tax code appear in Quotation .
    Thanks In advance
    Regards,
    Payal Saxena

    Hi,
    Is the condition MWVS is maintained in  both pricing and tax procedures?
    For the tax code how you have maintained the condition record?Is it by transaction FTXP / FV11 or by MEK1?
    I think you have maintained the condtion by MEK1 for the tax code instead of FTXP / FV11.
    Remember it is a tax condition and should be defined in tax procedure.
    This condtion record contains the tax code which is getting defaulted to RFQ.
    Delete the condition record for MEK1.
    Cheers,
    Satish Purandare

  • Error during transfer of tax Condition JIN1

    Dear All,
    As I create a Sales Order with ref. to Quotation,I get a message in the status Bar mentioned in the Subject line.
    Condition type JIN1 is not maintained in the Sales Document Pricing Procedure but mentioned in the Tax procedure.
    Detailed Error Description:-
    Error during transfer of tax condition JIN1
    Message no. VH807
    Diagnosis
    A condition type is found in the tax determination procedure, which is not available in the current document pricing procedure.
    If I see the JIN1 condition Type detail in the sales order,there is an added option in Control data :- X (Inactive via formulae of incorrect).
    Kindly suggest.
    Best Regards,
    Ankur

    Check in your pricing procedure, whether you have maintained this condition type.  Next check in FTXP whether you have maintained the required percentage against this condition type
    Incidentally, if you are in ECC6, condition type for CST is JIN7 and not JIN1 in which case, check in V/07 and select MWST
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Error during transfer of tax condition JA1X

    How to resolve this error? This error is appearing when i am copying quotation to sales order and saving the same.The momebt i save the SO ..it gives following error.
    Error during transfer of tax condition JA1X
    Message no. VH807
    Diagnosis
    A condition type is found in the tax determination procedure, which is not available in the current document pricing procedure.
    Bhushan
    Message was edited by:
            Bhushan Shah

    If your tax procedure is  taxinj you have to maintain same condition type in your factory pricing procedure also ja1x is stat condition type.
    check all manual changes of budget legal implication changes and follow master note 1032265

  • New Tax condition type created in ECC, replicated to CRM

    Hello All,
    I have created a new tax condition type in ECC and through initial load replicate the same to CRM. Even pricing procedure repliction with new tax condition is also successful.
    But, the new tax condition is not appearing in condition tab at item level when i create quotation in CRM.
    Please advise.
    Thanks and Regards
    DJ

    Hi
    Iam facing with the same problem we have created new tax conditon in r/3 and we have replicated it into crm we can find in the pricing procedure of crm as the new tax condition type but iam unable to see that in the order conditions tab.
    Could you please let me know the solution or could u please provide me witht he solution. to kmasthanrao at gmail com.
    Thanks and Regards
    Masthan

  • Tax Conditions for Sales and Distribution using Jurisdiction Code in Canada

    Hello everyone,
    I would like to share with you a doubt relating taxes for Sales and Distribution in Canada.
    The Tax conditions for Sales and Distribution in Canada are the CTX1 (GST - Canada), CTX2 (PST - Canada) and CTX3 (Base + GST). These are the Tax Conditions which appear when creating a Material or a Client for the Canada Region, and are also the ones included in the Canada Standandard Pricing Procedure.
    I tried to apply the standard method of creating a Master Record for these conditions, but an error relating the Jurisdiction Code came out while releasing to accounting.
    Does anyone one how to procceed? Which are the important issues with Finance Accounting to take in to account?
    I would really appreciate any comment relating this issue.
    Thank you very much in advanced.
    Víctor

    Dear Mr. Lakshmipathi,
    In first place, thank you very much for your quick response.
    I have tried many different procedures to get the aim, and among others, a new access sequence was created to allow the introduction of the Jurisdiction Code (UTXJ is not available for Sales Conditions) but once the Condition is created, it is not recognized when creating the Order ("pricing error: Mandatory condition CTX is missing"). Maybe it has something to do with the fact that these conditions are not included in the Finance Accounting Tax Procedure, where the conditions, which represent the same taxes but with different condition names, are defined for a certain Tax Code and Jurisdiction code.
    Among the different SAP notes for the error relating the Jurisdiction code, there was one proposing to change the Condition Category from "D" (Taxes) to a value between "1 and 4". By doing this a new error appears while creating the order, saying that there are conditions in the Tax procedure (JRC1, JRC2)which are not included in the Sales Pricing procedure. By including this conditions in the Pricing procedure, the Tax Conditions existing in the Finance Accounting Tax Procedure are brought to the Order Conditions, in addition to the Sales Tax Conditions. And there is something more, each Tax Condition from the Finance Accounting Procedure appears twice, one with the application V (Sales) with value zero, and one with application TX (Taxes) with the value existing in the Finance Accounting Taxes Procedure. This is how at the end, the corresponding %value of the taxes is brought to the Invoice with the correct Tax Code, and the proper Jurisdiction Code, which is different for each condition.
    Thank you very much for your time.
    Víctor Liedo

  • Find Tax conditions and amounts while creating a PO from reference.

    Hi friends,
    I am creating a PO from another reference PO. When I create the PO the Tax conditions and
    amounts come from Sabrix 3rd party system. This data gets saved into SAP internal memory and
    is visible when we follow PO item-> Invoice Tab->Taxes-->then we can see Tax
    conditions and there amounts as well. when we press SAVE button PO gets created and KNUMV
    (Condition Number) gets formed and then we can access this Condition types and Amounts data
    from KONV table by specifying the Condition number which is the Primary key of KONV table.
    But we need to access this data of Condition types and Amounts even before we press SAVe
    button on ME21N screen.
    Please help me on this.

    Hi,
    As mentioned that this error was one of the wierdest SAP issues I have faced, it was due to the silliest copy paste errors on my behalf. I completely overlooked the POITEMX naming.
    For 4 values of RFQ_NO, RFQ_ITEM, PREQ_NO, PREQ_ITEM, I didnt have the 'X' for POITEMX and kept on looking for errors for days.
    BAPI_PO_CREATE1 works with min. possible inputs successfully.
    Thanks to all!

  • Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

    Hi All,
    I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan.  Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
    However, the header Total value in the Contract  gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line  + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
    For eg.
    Normal Error free  Contract
    Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                       Material          Outgoing Target val
    Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax )  )
    Item 0020    MAT2               150.00   
    Contract with billing plan error in second line
    Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR 
                            MAterial       Outgoing target val          
    Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
    Item 0020         MAT2              0.00         
    Any inputs would be most welcome.
    Regards,
    Venkatesh.
    Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

    No, i didn't.
    Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
    At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run. 
    But the result of running is different from my purpose.
    To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

  • How to manual maintain TAX condition value while creating sales order

    Hi
    I am creating one Tax condition suppose JLST without access sequence .
    while creating sales order I am manually maintain the % value of TAX. suppose it is 1%
    then I see It show some value in TAX .
    save that sales order & creating delivery document for that but when I create Invoice its show error.
    " Tax code  in procedure CMTAXP is invalid ".
    I know the configuration only for Tax condition with vk11 condition record .
    BUT now I want to maintain TAX condition at the time of creating sales order.
    so I remove the access sequence of that condition .
    but It shows tax code error while billing.
    My main question is that If i maintain condition record while creating sales order then how i can assign Tax code .
    Can it is possible ?
    if yes then How?
    please help me.
    thank you

    Hi,
    The "straight-forward" answer for Tax Code creation is contact the FI consultant. He shall help you, by creating Tax codes.
    I have tested, with creating a tax cond type (copy of MWST) & manually entering values. I can create Sorder, Dlv and Bill but I cannot create an Accounting document. That is because of every line (amount) a Tax code is necessary.
    I THINK, you can NOT have manually filled tax codes; access sequence is needed to get the tax value (%) and the Tax code from the condition record.
    There is lot of material on the web to understand Tax classification, code etc. etc. See a useful link below -
    http://www.sapgeek.net/2010/04/sd-determines-tax-code/
    In short Tax code is a must and take the help of your FI consultant for the configuration of the same.
    BTW - Tax code is already made created for MWST, therefore I suggested that you can use MWST. Furthermore, you can change the values corresponding to Tax codes in FTXP.
    But if you are a beginner in these things, better take help.

  • Modify MWST (tax condition) value

    Dear All,
    I got requirement to modify the value of tax (condition type MWST in Sales Pricing procedure).
    Example: base value is 1000, --->tax 10% (automatic by SAP) is 100. However, I want to change this value to 120.
    Can I do that, please suggest with the routine or instruction.
    Thank you very much,

    Hi,
    I guess this may be ur requirement..
    Go to V/06 select ur condition type MWST under the tab Changes which can be made mark the filed Value if its unmarked..
    Now create sales order and u will be able to change the value of MWST cond.type manually..in condtion tab
    Reg
    JJ

  • Sales tax condition not picking in p.o

    Dear gurus,
    I am getting problem of sales tax . Its maintained in tax pricing procedure. I haver maintained condition record for the same in FV11. I am getting all other taxes only sales tax condition is not appering?   can any 1 tell about this?

    u check whether sales tax condition type is assigned in fvll correctly to the same tax code
    u assign the conditon type in excise defaults ( spro>log gen> tax on goods mvmts>india> determine excise duty> maintain excise defaults
    and also check the validity periods.
    If PO date is not falling with in the validtiy periods then system will not pick the valuye
    chris

  • All tax condition in while billing document insted of Sales order

    Hi,
      As per our present process for excise and non excise Sales order and any other type of sales order we have created different pricing procedure and sales order type and when we create sales order we can see the tax conditions with amount in sales order only,  is it possible to make only one sales order type but intial no tax condition should come in Sales order we want to common sales order type and the we will create different delivery types for different type of order conditions lik eexcise , non ecise etc. and after that when we create the billing document at that time tax condtion should come in the billing document condition with tax amount.
       How to configure above.
    regards,
    zafar

    Hi Zkarnalkar,
    Have you tried setting pricing requirement #24 for all tax conditions in your pricing procedure?
    This is a standard SAP requirement routine that will allow the condition to appear only for Invoices (other than Pro-Forma), Credit/Debit requests, and Returns.
    If this is too much, then you can ask your development team to copy this code into a custom requirement routine and adjust as needed.
    Best Regards,
    Laura

  • Different tax condition value at the time of GR as compared to PO

    Hi All,
    The issus is as follows ;
    We have maintained the tax condition type JIPC (Input Sales Tax) by t-code FV11 as 3% and subsequently created the PO.
    But when we are doing GR against the same PO in Accounting Document the GR/IR clearing Account is getting posted with the value of tax 2%(Non deductable tax).
    We have checked the validity period of condition type JIPC on day of GR is 3% only.Despite showing the PO screen 3% of non deductable tax accounting document of GR is picking the 2% of tax in GR/IR clearing account.
    Thx in advance.
    Shiwanshu

    Hi Anji ,
       thanks to reply. but my problem is some deffrent. I take an example for that:
    I am doing MIGO at this time PO price was 100 , VAT 4% condition JVRD now post this document suppose mat doc is 5900000021.
    I will get in my report
    Doc no.:5900000021
    price   :100
    VAT    : 4
    Condi: JVRD
    now some one make change in this PO like price 150 , VAT 3% condintio JVRN.
    if now i will execute my report then i will get.
    Doc no.:5900000021
    price   :150
    VAT    : 3
    Condi: JVRN
    but i need old data when GR wad post as above.

  • Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in Sales order

    Hi,
    Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in sales order...
    Scenario:
    Tax condition types:
    JCST- CST Payable
    JVAT- VAT Payable GJ
    Customer Tax classification for JVAT in OVK3:
    1-  VAT 4%
    A- VAT 0%
    B- VAT 2%
    Material Tax classification for JVAT in OVK4:
    0-Tax Exempt
    1-Full Tax
    In CMR for
    Sold to Party:1001(Mumbai), In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have
    Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption
    IN / INDIA / JCST  / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%
    IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ  / 1 / VAT 4%
    In CMR for
    Ship to Party:2001(Gujarat),In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have
    Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption
    IN / INDIA / JCST  / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%
    IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ  / A / VAT 0%
    Access Seq:   JLST
    Condition table : 368(Country/Region of Del Plant/Region/Tax class1-Cust/Tax Class1-Mat)
    Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/1/1 as 4%
    Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/A/1 as 0%
    Now the sale(Shipping to) is happening in Gujarat..
    In sales order
    I entered SP:1001 and SH: 2001
    When i check the pricing in sales order,condition type JVAT is triggering 4% which is not true as it as to pick 0%
    Kindly guide me where i went wrong...
    Regards
    Azeez.Mohd

    Hi Friends.
    I found the solution...
    Its customization mistake..
    Solution:
    When we have 'n' tax categories then we should have 'n' condition tables..
    I have 2 tax categories: JCST and JVAT but i have only one condition table 368 which is wrong.. i should have 2 condition tables.. so i created another con. table 468 and assigned to access aeq JLST.
    then when i create cond. record , we have to select the appropriate table then it will fetch accordingly.. in sales order..
    with regards

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to customize the table layout in WAD (BI70)

    hi experts, i want to customize the table layout in WAD. in 3.5, i can set the table interface class,and use T_Code se24. but now i am using BI7.0, there is no table interface, so how can i customize the table layout?

  • Station name reverting on logout

    hello, this is not all that uncommon, but i haven't seen a solution. i have a computer, i need to change its name. i do this via sharing prefs, no problem. as soon as i log out it reverts back to the old station name. i've tried this as root, user, a

  • What is this non-printing character? (¤)

    The generic currency symbol (¤) shows up often as a non-printing character in a document I'm editing, mostly inside table cells where I'd expect paragraph symbols to be.  I can't find any information anywhere, and now I'm curious.  Does anybody know

  • Book is on sale, can I give it away via my website?

    Hi, Trying here to be a bit of everything – editor, publisher, marketing, apprentice techie – and sometimes the brain slows down when asked to address an unexpected area. So can I ask what may be a naive question: is it possible to give, free, an exi

  • WRT160N issue. I'm about to blow my brains out.

    Ok, so let me give the backstory. We're using this router for a small business. We went to one of our locations. I'll refer to this location as location #9. Anyways, we went to #9 with intentions of installing a Sonicwall, which is a router/firewall.