TAX condtion is manual and with Cal type is 'B' fixed amt

Hello Team,
I am new to SCN, Need Help on below issue,
Requirement : In my Client Process, Only Tax value (manually condition maintained) need to settle to the customer It is like a Credit memo and Debit memo Process. (NO delivery and PGI).
Reason : some times User entering wrong (Mostly Client is using manual conditions in pricing procedure becoz it is integrated with AFS) Tax values and processing, for this we need to develop a new OTC cycle to settle only TAX amount/value to the customer by calling BApi which are the values entered wrongly and processed by the user.
for this created one Pricing condition and placed in pricing procedure and maintained condition record with only 0.01 INR (here Client approved to maintained min net value so i maintained 0.01 INR.)
created TAX condition type maintained manual condition with required fields in pricing procedure.
maintained VKOA settings for both condition types.
maintained tax code and TAX procedure determinations with the help of FICO team
creating SO it is working fine, when trying to post the values in to accounts giving errors "TAX CODE PROCEDURE TAXINJ IS INVALID"
and even we created VKOA settings and Tax code in FTXP for TAX condition type it not reflecting in revenue account determination at VF02 View, only Pricing tax determination is showing, TAX determination is missing,
kindly help me out on this.

Hello Sir,
Here i am attaching all the pics which are determined TAX procedure in INVOICE level, still i am not able to reflect the TAX determination for TAX condition type ZICP in first pic. did i missed somtng
javascript:;

Similar Messages

Manual and mandatory condition type??

Hi
What happens when you do not enter a value for a manual and mandatory condition type?
What are the difference between these two?

Manual:
This indicator specifies whether the specific condition type can be determined manually during sales order processing.
If we check the box then the entry is going to be manual, if we uncheck it, it is going to be automatic.
For Base Price and Taxes, the entry should be automatic.
For Discounts and Freights, The entry should be manual.
If we check the box, in VA01 when we go to conditions at the header/item level, the condition type will not be listed. If we require we will have to manually enter it.
If we uncheck the box, in VA01 when we go to conditions at the header/item level, the condition type will be listed.
Mandatory:
This indicator specifies that particular condition type is mandatory in the pricing procedure.
If we check the box, then in VA01 at the header/item level in the conditions tab, if we delete the value in the condition type and try to save the document then system will not allow us to do it and throws an error.
If we uncheck the box, then in VA01 at the header/item level in the conditions tab, if we delete the value in the condition type and try to save the document then system will allow us to save it, without giving any error.
Mandatory check box should be checked in condition types which are compulsorily required in pricing procedure. Ex.: PR00, MWST.
If the condition type is checked with mandatory option, then value should be maintained for that condition type, otherwise the system will not allow the user to process the document.
Hope it helps you.
Regards
AK
Please reward points if helpful

Mail - Forwarding attachments manually and with rules - how do I keep my attachments?

I have the latest updates of Lion on by MacBookPro (late 2010 model). I use mail to receive mail from my business account (Exchange account) and my personal account (IMAP account). Up until this summer, everything was working peachy with the system. I have multiple folders in my accounts and many rules to sort the mail and some that automatically forward mail messages to other people in my office who are also on exchange server.
Since this summer, we really noticed in August, we have noticed that the attachements are sometimes missing from emails I send out either automatically through rules (attachements never appear in the emails on the receiver's end) or manually, sometimes they receive, sometimes they don't (most of the times, but not always, when they don't work, it is a pdf in attachement, although it has happened on occasion with docs and jpgs or other graphics files). The bizarre thing is that on occasion a receiver replies to my email telling me there is no attachement, and although the email I receive doesn't show a paperclip, the attachament is actually embedded in the email!
If I write a new mail, and manually add an attachement, it seems to work.
My IT guy, who runs the exchange server says that it is bizarre because he can see the attachement in my email, but when it is delivered it disappears, but if he opens it at the server, it reappears. He has made all the latest updates and has trolled the support sites, but has found no solution.
I receive a newsletter everyday, which is a rather large 8-10 Mb pdf. My rule tells it to automatically forward to the receptionnist so that she can send it out to her mailing list. The message I receive always has the attachment, but in the forwarded message the attachment dissappears. In this case, when I look at message in my sent mail folder - there is no attachment. I tried using re-direct instead of forward as a rule and it still did the same thing...
I guess I want to know if anyone is experiencing the same issue, and if anyone has any other solutions to make forwarding work better.
P.S. When I use the IMAP account, the forwarding doesn't seem to be a problem, however I can't figure out how I could run a rule for an email I receive on my exchange account so that it forwards via my IMAP account. Also this would not be ideal, as then all my business contacts would get mail from my personal account...
Thanks for any help you could provide.

Uncheck:
But you'll still have to navigate around the icon.

Getting redirected by urlseek90 search, how do I get rid of it ? After googling the issue I tried to remove manually and with the number of scans, but no luck so far. Will appreciate reliable solution!

Did full Firefox reinstall with deleting user preferences, then disabled all plug-ins, scanned with Avast, Panda, Spybot, Malwarebytes, Winpatrol. No luck so far :(

I appreciate the reply jorgvloet! Worked for me too!

Link of material movement with inspection type

Hello Masters,
I have scenario where component at shop floor will be segregated for inspection. The requirement is to do result/defect recording for those parts and if required then those parts need to be scrapped. So one way of doing that can be to move those parts to either blocked stock or QI stock (ideal option) or to specific storage location so that planning can be taken care of (if material are still in unrestricted then planning will consider those part as OK part and planning may fail). And to record result/defect we require inspection lot, which can be created by using above mentioned material movement.
But problem is how to create inspection lot so that we can do result/defect recording for those materials and scrap those material.
Please note that material master will have QM setup active (inspection type 01 - Goods Receipt Insp. for Purchase Order) and hence we can move material from unrestricted stock to QI stock only through QM.
I am not sure if we should use inspection type 08 - Stock transfer inspection, as there can be many instances of material transfer within plant. And with inspection type 08 active, system will create inspection lot every time there is any material transfer.
One way can be to create new goods movement only for this kind of transfer and new inspection type and link both together. So that when ever material is transferred using that particular goods movement, system creates inspection lot as well as material will be in QI stock. But I am not sure how this is possible or not and if yes then how this can be done.
I know query was too long to read and I think I was clear enough to explain what the requirement is.
It would be great if I can get some guidance from you masters at the earliest convenience as it is bit of importance.
Thanks and regards,
Devang

Hi Devang,
I guess this is Line rejection scenario. Correct me if understanding goes wrong. You have okayed the material against 01 inspection lot and UD has been given. Now you find this material defective on shop floor.
I think the 2nd option suggested by marwadi sounds better. I suggest one more possibility, just check whether feasible.
1.     Create quality notification Q2 type through QM01. While creating you can give references of original PO and material document, which fetch vendor name and material code automatically.
2.     Record defects and all other required information in notification.
3.     After this, you find an option in action box, transfer post unrestricted - >block . Click there. This will transfer the stock from unrestricted to block.
4.     If you want planning persons should not consider this stock as OK, remove block stock from MRP stock availability check. As a result of which stock lying in block will not be considered as available stock.
5.     From block stock you can send this material back to vendor through MIGO. Otherwise you can create return delivery from notification through action box also. Check what is feasible in your case.
Here you need not create inspection lot, no need to use any user exit.
Regards,
Anand Rao

Key differencess bet'n Altrnative condtion base value and Alternative calcu

Hi All
I read many times even though I have dought in pricing where in, differentating Altrnative condtion base value and Alternative calculation type.
I know these two are forumalas.
I am looking for key differencess bet'n Altrnative condtion base value and Alternative calculation type
Where & which senario I can make out the differnces bet'n Altrnative condtion base value and Alternative calculation type.
Please explain in details which can keep in mind for long run...
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ramkrishna.

Hi Rama krishna
go thru this....u can make difference and will have idea too
AltCty - Condition formula for alternative calculation type:
It is again a Routine that is written by ABAP Consultant.
It is an alternative formula for the condition type that can be used instead of standard
formulas.
For example, let us take the Profit Margin which can be both + / - , so here this
routine will help us in generating the value which can be either + or -. Profit margin is
not a condition type so it cannot be classified as +ve or -ve in the V/06.
Ex.: 950 0 Profit Margin 11.
So we assign 11 - Profit Margin.
If new routines are to be defined we follow the procedure given below.
Go to T.Code: VOFM. - Maintain Requirements & Formulas
Click on the "Formulas" and then on the "Condition Values".
We have a list of routines, we can ask ABAP consultant to create new routines
based on the client requests. And we assign the application type.
AltCBV - Alternative formula for condition base value:
Formula for determining the condition basis as an alternative to the standard.
It is again a Routine that is written by ABAP Consultant.
It is used as a basis to calculate value of the condition type instead of using it from the
"FROM" column.· Ex.: Freight - KF00.
Freight is calculated based on weight, volume etc. and not on the base price. In pricing
there is no entry of weight from which the value can be referred like we do for
discounts using base price. We have to get the value from the Material master.
In this column we can mention the value as 12 - Gross Weight or 13 - Net Weight.
During pricing, the system will consider the value that is mentioned in this column and
determine the freight based on this value.
Suppose we have Net weight: 100 kgs and Gross Weight: 150 kgs. And if we mention
13 in this column then the Freight condition KF00 will be calculated using the weight
as 100 kgs.
Thanks and regards
Chandra

SD: Pricing: Subtotal, Alt Cal type, Requirements

Dear All
Can you please help providing details on functions of standard Subtotal and Alt Cal Types provided in SAP-SD Pricing.
I mean:
1. Standard Subtotals like 2,3,5,G etc.
2. Alt Cal Types like 4,7 etc.
3. Requirements Like 10, 70, 71, 4 etc.
Any document details will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Raghu A.

Subtotal:
u2022     The value of this field determines where the values of subtotals to be captured i.e. in which table and which field.
u2022     Controls whether and in which fields condition amounts or subtotals (for example, a customer discount or the cost of a material) are stored.
u2022     If the same fields are used to store different condition amounts, the system totals the individual amounts.
u2022     These condition amounts or subtotals are used as a starting point for further calculations. You may, for example, want a subtotal of all the discounts included in the pricing of a sales order.
Requirement:
u2022     It is a routine that is written by an ABAP consultant according to the business requirement.
u2022     By defining Requirement in condition technique we can restrict the access of condition type.
u2022     To understand the concept, we will take the example of the Rebates. Rebates are to be included during the billing document processing and not in the sales document processing. As rebates are given on the delivered quantity and not on the ordered quantity (in case of cut-off period for rebates).
u2022     For rebates we use the condition types BO01 to BO05, and in the Requirement column we give the value 24 which is "Only in Billing Document".
u2022     This Requirement will ensure that these condition types will appear only during the billing document processing.
u2022     If new Requirements are to be defined we follow the procedure given below.
u2022     Go to T.Code: VOFM. - Maintain Requirements & Formulas
u2022     Click on the "Requirements" in the top menu and then click on "pricing".
u2022     We have a list of requirements, we can ask ABAP consultant to create new requirement based on the client requests.
u2022     And we assign the application type like V - Sales/Distribution etc.
AltCty - Condition formula for alternative calculation type:
u2022     It is again a Routine that is written by ABAP Consultant.
u2022     It is an alternative formula for the condition type that can be used instead of standard formulas.
u2022     For example, let us take the Profit Margin which can be both + / - , so here this routine will help us in generating the value which can be either + or -. Profit margin is not a condition type so it cannot be classified as +ve or -ve in the V/06.
u2022     Ex.: 950 0 Profit Margin 11.
u2022     So we assign 11 - Profit Margin.
u2022     If new routines are to be defined we follow the procedure given below.
u2022     Go to T.Code: VOFM. - Maintain Requirements & Formulas
u2022
u2022     Click on the "Formulas" and then on the "Condition Values".
u2022     We have a list of routines, we can ask ABAP consultant to create new routines based on the client requests.
u2022     And we assign the application type.
AltCBV - Alternative formula for condition base value:
u2022     Formula for determining the condition basis as an alternative to the standard.
u2022     It is again a Routine that is written by ABAP Consultant.
u2022     It is used as a basis to calculate value of the condition type instead of using it from the "FROM" column.
u2022     Ex.: Freight - KF00.
u2022     Freight is calculated based on weight, volume etc. and not on the base price. In pricing there is no entry of weight from which the value can be referred like we do for discounts using base price. We have to get the value from the Material master.
u2022     In this column we can mention the value as 12 - Gross Weight or 13 - Net Weight.
u2022     During pricing, the system will consider the value that is mentioned in this column and determine the freight based on this value.
u2022     Suppose we have Net weight: 100 kgs and Gross Weight: 150 kgs. And if we mention 13 in this column then the Freight condition KF00 will be calculated using the weight as 100 kgs.

Header condtion will not go with alt cal type

We attached alternative cal type to one of our header conditions. It is not working; the value found by this alt cal type is overwritten by standard SAP.
Is standard sap accepts the alternative cal type for the header condition?
Generally we enter manually the value for header condition.
If this is possible how to do the configuration setting of this header condition types ?
Laxman

Hi Laxman,
I think you are confusingtwo things.
One thing is header condition. For you to make a condition work at the headre level, you need to define it as header value in the condition definition. Then only it will work from Header to item level.
In your case the prices are moving from item to header and hence your calculated vaues are overwritten by the summed values of your line item values.
The second thing is manuall entry of prices. So if in your definition condition if manual entry is given preference then whatever the value SAP calculates will be overwritten by the manual price and this is irrespective of the fact that its header or item price.
Hence, if you want to make the header price work make it header condition in condition definition.
Hope this helps.
Abhishek

VF11 wrongly created with RV Doc type and with not clear status.

Hi All
Issue: There are 2 billing documents which were created(VF01) in March are canceled (VF11) in May. Cancel document is saved with a message (No automatic clearing of billing document XXXXXXXXX) and message diagnosis saying that u201CThe Automatic clearing of billing document and reversal is not possible. This may be, for example, because the line item update is deactivatedu201D
In the SD document flow cancel billing document is created and it's posted to accounting with Document type RV(which is not configured in the billing types) and it is in not clear status.
2 Sales order types are ZNRC(No Rebate u2013 Credit)    second is ZCR (CM Req With Refer).
Order Type : ZNRC , Billing type :ZG2, Cancel billing type :Z5, Accounting document in billing type for ZG2: is DG and accounting document in cancel billing type Z5 is :(_) blank.
Order type: ZCR Billing type :G2, Cancel billing type :S2, Accounting document in billing type for G2: is DG and accounting document in cancel billing type S2 is :(_) blank.
      FI document type Not maintained in the cancel billing type configuration because this should be determine by reversal document type DA which is maintained in DG document type from FI side. It will be triggered in VF11)
The above configuration is working with the order created VA01,billing VF01 and cancelling VF11 done in same period. If the order and billing done in old period and canceling(VF11) done in current period than FI document creating with RV document type and with not clear status in the document flow.
I reviewed similar issues with SAP Note and with below explanation:
          "There are 2 procedures that are possible when Vf11 is posted.
          Old Procedure - An FI "Reversal" document was created that was not connected with the orignal.
          New Procedure - A Real FI reversal was carried out with clearing."
In this case, our system is following with new procedure except above mentioned orders created in previous period and and canceled in current period.
My Questions are: How the RV document is getting triggered here? why the cancel document (Reversal FI Doc) is not clearing?
     Appreciate your answers or suggestions.
Thanks in advance,
Sunil
Edited by: Sunil kumar Matta on Jun 9, 2011 3:40 PM

Thank you Ivano.
I referred SAP note 1259505 and 339928. But initially we thought of none of the symptoms mentioned in the SAP note are matching with our issue. Then we contacted SAP online support and they suggested checking one SAP note (Mentioned above).
Our system is following new cancellation procedure, but itu2019s failing only for some few documents.
Finally we identified several reasons for the issue. One is profitability segment in the billing document and cancelled document is different due to some changes in segment assignments. Another one is consolidation- consolidation document does not exist in the billing document list but it is getting created in Canceled document (VF11).(Consolidation postings are switched off some time back and now itu2019s on)
After some discussions it is decided to include accounting document type (Reversal) in cancel billing types to avoid default RV document type in canceled billing document accounting document. And non-cleared documents need to be created manually in F-32.
Thread is closed.
Sunil

Issue with Information broadcasting and pre-cal server in SAP BI

Hi Experts,
I have issue with information Broadcasting and Pre-cal server. I have a worrkbook whcih runs from information broadcasting in pre-cal server. Workbook is desinged on single query and workbook contains visual basic code. workbook has a variable which is controlled by Control query in information broadcasting.
I have 20 employees every month I need to send workbook via e-mail from information broadcasting. The problem is sometimes all 20 employees will recieve e-mails and sometimes not. I identified there is something wrong in workbook or in pre-cal server.
because after workbook calculation in pre-cal server is not pushing to SOST so there is something wrong in workbook or in pre-cal server.
I closely observed pre-cal server front end log. There are few operations performing on workbook in pre-cal server
like Open workbook, Calculate workbook, Save woorkbook and close workbook. In success case pre-cal sever is performing all the operations but in failure case pre-cal server is missing Close workbook case.
Below log In pulled from pre-cal server
Can you please tell what could be the problem.
Successful job
3/11/2011 9:29:46 AM (3) -> RS_PREC_LAUNCH_EXCEL i nvoked in thread 3 and job 'BIBCAST4L4EIS7TOR5BWG0
2PCUG9ZPPP'. nvoked in thread 3 and job 'BIBCAST4L4EIS7TOR5BWG0
3/11/2011 9:29:46 AM (3) -> InitConnection in thre ad 3
3/11/2011 9:29:46 AM (3) -> Trying to open "C:\Pro gram Files\Common Files\SAP Shared\BW\BExAnalyzer.
xla" gram Files\Common Files\SAP Shared\BW\BExAnalyzer.
3/11/2011 9:30:18 AM (4) -> RS_PREC_GET_SERVER_STA TUS invoked.
3/11/2011 9:30:18 AM (4) -> RS_PREC_GET_SERVER_STA TUS finished
3/11/2011 9:30:35 AM (3) -> Using Version 7100.4.1 200.35 of BExAnalyzer.xla
3/11/2011 9:30:35 AM (3) -> PID of Excel process: "2504"
3/11/2011 9:30:35 AM (3) -> EndOfInitConnection in thread 3
3/11/2011 9:30:35 AM (3) -> RS_PREC_LAUNCH_EXCEL f inished
3/11/2011 9:30:36 AM (0) -> Calculation Request 91 1A35ED029D4D79DD7A000200000000 received for job 'B
IBCAST4L4EIS7TOR5BWG02PCUG9ZPPP'. 1A35ED029D4D79DD7A000200000000 received for job 'B
3/11/2011 9:30:52 AM (6) -> RS_PREC_GET_SERVER_STA TUS invoked.
3/11/2011 9:30:52 AM (6) -> RS_PREC_GET_SERVER_STA TUS finished
3/11/2011 9:31:22 AM (0) -> Opening workbook: C:\W INDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks\SAPBEXPRECMML4NN
DVLYAPC2SYIC7F1AAIO_0.xls INDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks\SAPBEXPRECMML4NN
3/11/2011 9:31:43 AM (0) -> Refresh BExAnalyzer.xl a!MenuRefreshPrecalc returned with 1.
3/11/2011 9:31:43 AM (0) -> Calculated workbook C: \WINDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks
SAPBEXPRECMML
4NNDVLYAPC2SYIC7F1AAIO_0.xls saved. \WINDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks
SAPBEXPRECMML
3/11/2011 9:31:43 AM (0) -> Calculated workbook C: \WINDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks
SAPBEXPRECMML
4NNDVLYAPC2SYIC7F1AAIO_0.xls closed. \WINDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks
SAPBEXPRECMML
3/11/2011 9:31:44 AM (0) -> Excel based operations finished.
Failure job
3/10/2011 10:22:58 AM (1) -> RS_PREC_LAUNCH_EXCEL invoked in thread 1 and job 'BIBCAST4L41566ZBZDN2N
TGJR0462ZFX'. invoked in thread 1 and job 'BIBCAST4L41566ZBZDN2N
3/10/2011 10:22:58 AM (1) -> InitConnection in thr ead 1
3/10/2011 10:22:58 AM (1) -> Trying to open "C:\Pr ogram Files\Common Files\SAP Shared\BW\BExAnalyzer
.xla" ogram Files\Common Files\SAP Shared\BW\BExAnalyzer
3/10/2011 10:23:20 AM (3) -> RS_PREC_GET_SERVER_ST ATUS invoked.
3/10/2011 10:23:20 AM (3) -> RS_PREC_GET_SERVER_ST ATUS finished
3/10/2011 10:23:44 AM (1) -> Using Version 7100.4. 1200.35 of BExAnalyzer.xla
3/10/2011 10:23:44 AM (1) -> PID of Excel process: "2544"
3/10/2011 10:23:44 AM (1) -> EndOfInitConnection i n thread 1
3/10/2011 10:23:44 AM (1) -> RS_PREC_LAUNCH_EXCEL finished
3/10/2011 10:23:44 AM (5) -> Calculation Request 9 11A35ED02654D789871000900000000 received for job '
BIBCAST4L41566ZBZDN2NTGJR0462ZFX'. 11A35ED02654D789871000900000000 received for job '
3/10/2011 10:24:27 AM (0) -> RS_PREC_GET_SERVER_ST ATUS invoked.
3/10/2011 10:24:27 AM (0) -> RS_PREC_GET_SERVER_ST ATUS finished
3/10/2011 10:24:31 AM (5) -> Opening workbook: C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks\SAPBEXPRECQB2VE
A8O8D8FBHYCR4HVB5UI8_0.xls WINDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks\SAPBEXPRECQB2VE
3/10/2011 10:24:52 AM (5) -> Refresh BExAnalyzer.x la!MenuRefreshPrecalc returned with 1.
3/10/2011 10:24:52 AM (5) -> Calculated workbook C :\WINDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks
SAPBEXPRECQB
2VEA8O8D8FBHYCR4HVB5UI8_0.xls saved. :\WINDOWS\TEMP\BW\Analyzer\Workbooks
SAPBEXPRECQB
Thanks in advance
Narendra

Hi Ravikanth,
Thank you very much for the reply
I went into RSPRECADMIN and clicked on 'Display Current Queue'. There we have 3 sections
1) Queue Overview of Open Precalculations
I can see this section is always blank after running IB also
2) Queue Overview of Current Precalculations
In this section I can see an entry after running IB and duration is changing. but some time workbook in this section will never processed but the duration column is changing may be something is happening at this stage.
If the entry is not proccessed in this section and IB SM37 job will never end. I manually cancelled the job from SM50.
Don't why the workbook is taking long time and will never end even though I cancelled the SM37 IB job.
3) Queue Overview of Proccessed Error-Free Precalculations
All the error free workbooks which means all pre-cal server completed workbook calculation and sent to SOST.
I manually ran the workbook for all the 20 employees I can't find any pop-up message (earlier we have pop-up windows appearing because of VB code and when report returns no data and we fixed the pop-up issues)
Can you please help me further to trace the error.
Thank you
Narendra

Relation B/W tax and pricing condition types

HI friends
I want to know relation b/w tax and pricing condition types.
Here, i think we are giving relation in pricing procedure, how we are giving that relation, what is that mean.
How sys will carry the values from tax condition types to pricing condition types.
plz give me the details early.
with regards
lakky

Hi...
Actually in priciing procedure it is only sequential arrnagment of COnt type could be price, dicount or tax ... so that system calculates as process given by client.
now when u see tax condition types .. they are also created in FI and also in Sd with same controls and linked via the account key...
Account key MWS, MW3 are created in Fi and only used in Sd but azccount keys like ERL, ERF, ERS are created in Sd and used for account det in VKOA ...
also MWS, MW3 used in VkOA but are used in TAx procedure also and are assigned G/L in Tax code ...
now when u c the pricicng in a Sd doc .. sales order then all totals calculated and net price given and below that a Tax total given ... how system calculates tax totals is that in the tax conditio type in condition category .. we give Taxes as D so that all cond types with this cond catefory gets added and totalled to this tax total figure ..
Reward if helpful
Krishna

RVIVAUFT - Intercompant Billing Issuebut left with two types: IGA and IVA.

We use VI98 to view the Intrastat Billing documents.
But after executing we found that some Billing types are not being considered. We have almost solved the issue but left with 2 billing types: IGA and IVA.
Why these are not appearing? These billing documents are created by a Z transaction - ZORDERIC which basically calls the program RVIVAUFT. The documents are created but the Foreign Trade data (for both header and item) are not being populated.
Do not assume that we have not configured Foreign Trade data wrongly.
Everything is going fine when we use VF01 to crate I/C Billing documents. The problem is when we use ZORDERIC TCode.
If we manually put the information for these IGA and IVA Billing types, then they are appearing in the VI98 TCode.
If anyone has faced such issue, please share your analysis.
Thanks in advance.
Sumanta

Hi Sumantha ,
I assume that Foregin trade data is implemented correctly . Also , I have checked the T Code - VI98 - INTRASTAT: Select Data for Receipt via SD Intercompany Billing and RVIVAUFT is working fine . Can you once again check the Configuration of the Foreign trade data for Stock Transport Orders.
The Path is as given below :
Sales and Distribution>Foreign Trade/Customs>Basic Data for Foreign Trade>Define Business Transaction Types And Default Value>Define Default Business Transaction Type (MM).
I believe the problem is with the configuration of Stock Transport orders .
Looking forward to your findings.
Regards
Veera

Post proft segment and cost center in a sales order with value type 4 in CC

Hello,
We have CO-PA activated in SD. When we create the Sales order the field "Profit Segment" is automatically filled (with the characteristics values) and additionally we field manually the cost center.
The main problem is that when we post in the two CO objects the cost center becomes automatically with value type 11 "Statistical Actual".
In the end of the month we need to do the Assessments (KSU5) from the invoices created from one cost center to various cost centers but since the cost center in the invoice has "statistical actual" value type we can't do the assessments.
Is there any way to post in profit segment and in cost center and the cost center becomes with value type 4 "Actual"?
Thank You

Hello,
Thank You for you answer. I have one more question.
Is there any way to desactivate the field "Proft Segment" only for a specific document type?
I've already tried in transaction KE4W and system is not creating now the Profitability Analysis document but this field "Profit Segment" is still with values so the cost center is still with value type 11.
I've tried to delete manualy the values in the field Profitability Analysis but system gives me an error related with incomplete data in sales order. I've look in SD customizing and this field is not configured in the incomplete data messages
Best Regards

Error with Material type/Tax code access sequence in Tax procedure

Hi,
I am trying to create an access sequence with Material type/tax code combination for my tax procedure. While I can generate the condition table successfully, I cannot create an access sequence. The access sequence gives me the pop up message " select a document field for MTART". I searched in the field catalog and its absent. However MTART exists in the table KOMG.
How can I include the field MTART ( material type) in the field catalog. The tax code field is shown as green. Please help.
Thanks and regards,
Soumya.

The field MTART was included as standard in the table . I didn't have to add anything. Further, i couldn't find any standard access sequence for tax procedures that include material type.
I am really stuck with this!!
Regards,
Soumya

[svn] 4136: Find loop variables initialized with "weak" types, e.g., NULL or VOID, and

Revision: 4136
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-18 14:50:38 -0800 (Tue, 18 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
Find loop variables initialized with "weak" types, e.g., NULL or VOID, and
use the variable type used within the loop to normalize the local's type.
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/adobe/abc/GlobalOptimizer.java

Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them. This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

TAX condtion is manual and with Cal type is 'B' fixed amt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for