Post proft segment and cost center in a sales order with value type 4 in CC

Hello,
We have CO-PA activated in SD. When we create the Sales order the field "Profit Segment" is automatically filled (with the characteristics values) and additionally we field manually the cost center.
The main problem is that when we post in the two CO objects the cost center becomes automatically with value type 11 "Statistical Actual".
In the end of the month we need to do the Assessments (KSU5) from the invoices created from one cost center to various cost centers but since the cost center in the invoice has "statistical  actual" value type we can't do the assessments.
Is there any way to post in profit segment and in cost center and the cost center becomes with value type 4 "Actual"?
Thank You

Hello,
Thank You for you answer. I have one more question.
Is there any way to desactivate the field "Proft Segment" only for a specific document type?
I've already tried in transaction KE4W and system is not creating now the Profitability Analysis document but this field "Profit Segment" is still  with values so the cost center is still with value type 11.
I've tried to delete manualy the values in the field Profitability Analysis but system gives me an error related with incomplete data in sales order. I've look in SD customizing and this field is not configured in the incomplete data messages
Best Regards

Similar Messages

  • What is the impact of business area and cost center in the sales document

    Hi all
    I have small doubt regarding what is the impact of bussiness area and cost center in the sales document... what is the uses of these (bussiness area, cost center) is help full for sd module
    can any one reply plz....
    Thanking you

    Hi,
    Business Area determines where the revenue should be allocated when you sell a material or a service.
    For eg: If your customer is in say Mumbai and he is ordering for a service in Delhi (say DIAL - Delhi International Airport Limited) then based on the terminology.
    Your customer would belong to B Basis Business Area - WHERE THE REVENUE IS COMING FROM or WHERE YOUR CUSTOMER BELONGS TO (SALES OFFICE).
    Whereas your DIAL sales will belong to A Basis Business Area - WHERE THE REVENUE IS GOING TO.
    Cost Center would determine where your allocate your cost to.
    Say Rounding Off can be used as a cost element, because some sort of revenue is lost when figures are roudned off..
    Hope it clarifies your doubt.
    Reward points if satisfactory
    Regards
    Ravi.D.Mansharamani

  • *Internal Order* or *Cost Center* on SD Sales Order

    Hi Gurus,
    please can you tell me how we can set automatically Internal Order or Cost Center on SD Sales Order (without putting it manually).
    Thank you very much
    Kind Regards
    Andrea

    Hi Andrea,
    As Ambrusa told, one Z table should be created where you can maintain order reasons, sales org, sales order type and the internal order no. as combination and use the below mentioned user exit.
    When user create sales order, system will default the order reasons maintained in the z table and internal order no. will be picked as user select the order reason.
    Hope this will meet your requirement.
    Regards
    Suresh.

  • GL account and cost center field appearing for Goods issue movt type 201

    Hi SAP Gurus
    We are trying to post goods issue in ecc6 . The problem is that the GL Account and cost center fields are available fields .The cost center field is logical but why the GL account field is avaiable .
    How we can grey out the same field as it is going to be picked up from the valuation class setting in GBB - VBR ? Any ideas
    Regards
    Hitesh

    Hi Ravi
    You think that its ok we have to input the cost center .
    But if you allow the users to input the GL then you are overriding the whole purpose of defining the valuation class and offsetting entries ? What is your opinion ?When you input the material in the goods issue screen the offsetting entry needs to be picked from the GBB -VBR .Although even if you do not enter the GL the system posts the Godds issue document .But from the control perspective this needs to be suppressed .
    What do you think ?
    I have also posted the same in Logistics forum .
    Once  again many thanks for your help .In case you find some solution this would be of great help
    Regards

  • Profit center derivation in sales order with New GL

    Dear Gurus,
    We are using the New GL, so EC-PCA is not activated.
    We would like to set-up a substitution rule in order to derive the profit center in the sales order and customer invoice (we don't want the profit center to always be derived from the costing view of the material master data).
    I created a substitution rule with transaction 0KEM and assigned it to the controlling area with active status"3" (Other transactions + cross-company (orders + billing doc.)).
    Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be called when I create a sales order.
    Can you please confirm gthat 0KEM is the transaction to use even when we use New GL without EC-PCA?
    Where should I put a breakpoint in order to trace the call to the substitution rule?
    Thanks a lot in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Simo

    Dear Gurus,
    We are using the New GL, so EC-PCA is not activated.
    We would like to set-up a substitution rule in order to derive the profit center in the sales order and customer invoice (we don't want the profit center to always be derived from the costing view of the material master data).
    I created a substitution rule with transaction 0KEM and assigned it to the controlling area with active status"3" (Other transactions + cross-company (orders + billing doc.)).
    Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be called when I create a sales order.
    Can you please confirm gthat 0KEM is the transaction to use even when we use New GL without EC-PCA?
    Where should I put a breakpoint in order to trace the call to the substitution rule?
    Thanks a lot in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Simo

  • MB1A and Cost Center (KOSTL) based on Order (AUFNR)

    Hello,
    I have a requirement, where i must make a modification in transaction MB1A in the following way:
    On the second screen "Enter Goods Issue: New items" i must fill automatically the Cost Center field, based on the Order number (after the Enter).
    How can I do this?
    I've tried with a substitution in GGB1 but it didn't worked:
    select single kostv from coas into cobl-kostl where aufnr = cobl-aufnr.
    Thanks in advance !
    Tohi

    HI
    Can you check the below exits
    Transaction Code - MB1A                     Goods Withdrawal
    Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
    Enhancement
    MBCF0002                                Customer function exit: Segment text in material doc. item
    MBCF0005                                Material document item for goods receipt/issue slip
    MBCF0006                                Customer function for WBS element
    MBCF0007                                Customer function exit: Updating a reservation
    MBCF0009                                Filling the storage location field
    MBCF0010                                Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
    MBCF0011                                Read from RESB and RKPF for print list in  MB26
    MB_CF001                                Customer Function Exit in the Case of Updating a Mat. Doc.
    BADI
    MB_MIGO_BADI                            BAdI in MIGO for External Detail Subscreens
    MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI                       BAdI in MIGO for Changing Item Data
    MB_PHYSINV_INTERNAL                     Connection: Core Inventory and Retail AddOn
    MB_QUAN_CHECK_BADI                      BAdI: Item Data at Time of Quantity Check
    MB_RESERVATION_BADI                     MB21/MB22: Check and Complete Dialog Data
    MB_RESERVATION_SCR                      Screen BAdI for Retrofit DFPS
    MB_RESERVATION_UPCHD                    BAdI for Creation and Changing of Manual Reservations
    MB_RES_BAPI_CHANGE                      BAdI: Execution of Changes to Reservation Fields
    MB_RES_BAPI_CREATE1                     BAdI: Adoption of Customer's Own Fields as Reserv. Fields
    MB_RES_BAPI_DETAIL1                     BAdI: Display of Customer's Own Fields in Reservations
    MB_STOR_LOC_BADI_GTS                    BADI to Check and Change Storage Location (GTS Fct. Only)

  • Org Unit and Cost Center not displaying in 0001 with A012 relationship

    Hi Guru's,
    Kindly help me in this regard ,
    Whenever i hire a person to a position which has an A012 relationship (Chief Position) then Org Units and Cost centres are not getting displayed in IT0001 .
    But when i hire a person in the same org unit with A003 relationship ; both Org units and Costcentres are getting displayed
    I have used an LSMW for uploading relationships and objects and i have also run integration reports for the same but still i am not able to display org unit and cost centre in it0001 when i hire a person with A012 relationship .
    Kindly Help

    both great advice, also, check this link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/14/d22fe48435d111950d0060b03c6b76/content.htm
    within this information there are various reports to run, which help recon OM and PA integration.  it will help you find your data problem and then fix the data for you if you follow step by step.
    best regards,
    michael

  • Cost center field in sales order type

    Hi
    we have few sales orders type. INsome the order types, cost center field is available for input and in some it is not. Now how to make that field available in the sales order type ?
    Pls help
    Pushkaraj

    Hi Pushkaraj
    See the below link which I feel would be useful to your requirement.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/eb/13796243c411d1896f0000e8322d00/frameset.htm
    Thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Cost center field at sales order

    Dear GURUs,
    I require a field to copulate cost center at sales order level,so that it should copy to delivery.
    Please help.
    With Regards
    Core SD

    Dear Sir,
    Thanks for the reply.
    I have checked the same in
    sales order > Header > account assignment
    But we found
    Bussiness area & WBS element in it.
    can you please tell me where I can make the hide fields of sales order appear in the sales order screen.
    or screen layout.
    Thanks & Regards
    sandeep D.

  • Require help on coast center and work center tables through sales order

    dear experts
    my requirement is to report the cm05(capacity planning ) transaction.
    The original capacity planning consists of workcenter details.
    but my client needs the report as follows
    on which sales order and on which work center we require the capacity of materials.
    any tables and fields for this report please.
    help needed.
    kindly update me.

    hi,
    Please explore table CAUFV View "Order Headers PP/CO" ,here you will find the relationships between the three.
    Regards,
    Neha

  • COGS and cost center (by order reason)

    hi,
    i am confuse of COGS and cost center which assign by order reason
    below is my scenario, free sample order will be created for both outside customer and internal department. if free sample order for outside customer, COGS will have after PGI, but internal department using this sample, order reason to assign cost center will be used. DN also require to create.
    Then my question is any COGS of  sample order for internal department will be created? whats accouting impact. pls advice
    thanks

    Hi,
    Thanks for the quick replies. Our requirement is to post costs to a cost center  for some order reasons. (like free samples to cost centers). It is not for preventing costs.
    I think the setting in OVF3 may work. I am testing in sandbox client and update if sucessful.
    Thanks
    Kalyani.

  • Cost centre field in sales order account assignment screen

    Hello all,
    I am unable to find the settings for cost center field in sales order account assignment tab screen along with profit center and internal order. kindly let me know the path to select cost center.
    Thanks in advance
    Raju

    The Cost Center Determination settings is in OVF3 -  but there are some cases where the Cost Center must be exceptionally changed. 
    If the document category for order type in IMG VOV8 is defined to be "I" which belong to order type FD - Deliv.Free of Charge, then the field cost center is active for input during transaction VA01. 
    Alternatively, you can specify an order reason and assign a cost center to an order reason. 
    However the standard SAP works only at the header level though, so it would not work if cost center is needed on the line item. 
    The cost center are assign for such business transactions as :
    - Free deliveries
    - Returns
    - Deliveries of advertising materials
    You can also make cost center allocation dependent on the order reason, for example:
    Order reason: Damage in transit
    Order reason: Free sample
    Both the IMG settings are done in transaction OVF3, either with/without the order reason.

  • Several cost centers in one sales order

    The situation is.
    Weu2019ve got the task to find solution how to create sales order document with several cost centers.
    Now we use order reason to assign cost center in sales order.
    We use only one order reason in one document and it means one cost center in one sales order document.
    But we need to have opportunity to choose several cost centers. We mean assign different cost center for each item.
    For example sales order items:
    Material 1: Electricity u2013 X1 (cost center u2013 Y1);
    Material 2: Gas u2013 X2 (cost center u2013 Y2 );
    Material 3: Petrol u2013 X3 (cost center u2013 Y3);
    u2026
    Material n: Services u2013 Xn (cost center - Yn).
    The document sequence :Quotation (VA21) -> SALES order (VA01) -> Billing (VF01)
    Could you give me the recommendation or advice for this task?
    Many thanks.

    HI,
    The Cost Center Determination settings is in OVF3, the standard works only at the header level though, so it would not work if cost center is needed on the line item.
    For this case I suggest to try from CO view:
    A material is linked to a profit center. From this profit center you can determine a cost center using txn OKB9
    In combination with the material's account assignment field and account determination customizing, an alternate revenue account can be determined for this material. ("Normal" revenue accounts are to be used in combination with CO-PA).
    If this account is a cost element with category type "1" you need the entries in OKB9.
    Hope this help!
    Regards!

  • Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll

    Hello all. I have this scenario with a company that was merged into another and retroactive payroll occurs for absences and extra time in the "old" company, but the "old" merged company is closed so no postings can occur.
    I also found this unanswered post:  How to Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll
    We suppose that retroactive differences could be accounted in the new company code but I didnu2019t found any way to do it even in the BADI SMOD_PCPO0001 I couldnu2019t find a way to change the company code/cost center....
    Does anyone have dealt with the same problem? What is the solution?

    Amosha, thank you for your response.  Here is PCP0 that shows what I mean by 'header company code' that I don't see how to change (I re-ran pd 26 2008--bi-weekly payroll, btw):
    06/30/2009 Posting Document
    Run                      0000002791
    Company Code    0057
    Document            0000008174
    PostingCurrency  USD
    Reference           HRPAY00009
    Doc. Type            ZB
    Run Type             PP
    Posting Date        12/01/2008
    Documant Type   G/L Account Document   
    Document Date    06/30/2009
    Bus. Transaction HRP1
        There are error messages for this document
    Account Number with Text
    21301000   Accrued Salaries & Wages   CCTR 14515      ...
    20303998   HR P/R Doc Split                                               ...
    Messages for Document 000008174
    Error in document: HRPAY 0000008174
    The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 0001, not 0057
    Company code 0057 is now closed and has been merged into 0001.  Cost center 14515 in the above doc was populated by my clone of RPCIPE00 and call to my BAdI which retrieved current company and cost center from PA0001.  You can see from above that the 'header' data still shows 0057 and indeed, my version of RPCIPE00 only changes P_ITEM-BUKRS, P_ITEM-KOSTL and P_ITEM-SGTXT.  It looks to me that fm HRPP_TRANSLATE_FICO gets the 'header' company code afresh.  I was planning to leave WPBP-BUKRS (and all other Payroll data) alone (ie, not override company code).
    As for your other question, we post retros to /551 and /552. 
    Thanks again.

  • How to Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll

    Current problem:  A company code has been 'merged' into another one and the old company code can no longer be used.  In the last payroll run, there was a rate change that caused a retro back to the time of the old company code and since the old company code and cost center were closed, the FI posting error'ed out.  To correct, we had to delete the offending pernr from the cluster and back out the rate change until we came up with a solution. 
    Investigation has revealed a process called 'Substitute Cost Centers', but we tested it and a 'flusher' cost center is required to be set up in the old company code and FI refuses to open it up. 
    Also, I've located 3 user exits for RPCIPE00, but I do not see where  company and cost center can be changed.  So I've tried to code my own BAdi, but there seems to be a header company code that I'm not getting.  The item company code and cost center seem to be doable, but I don't know how to change the header company code.
    I am new to HR and Payroll having spent the last couple of years in BI and before that I worked with the material master and Purchasing.  It is my humble opinion that the company should not have been 'turned off' until Payroll was finished with it and that means 2 years until we archive.  In reading about symbolic accounts, several times it is written not ever to delete them.  Seems to me company code is the same.  But surely I must be wrong and there is a solution that will make everybody happy. 
    I would appreciate any and all ideas.  Thank you so much.

    Amosha, thank you for your response.  Here is PCP0 that shows what I mean by 'header company code' that I don't see how to change (I re-ran pd 26 2008--bi-weekly payroll, btw):
    06/30/2009 Posting Document
    Run                      0000002791
    Company Code    0057
    Document            0000008174
    PostingCurrency  USD
    Reference           HRPAY00009
    Doc. Type            ZB
    Run Type             PP
    Posting Date        12/01/2008
    Documant Type   G/L Account Document   
    Document Date    06/30/2009
    Bus. Transaction HRP1
        There are error messages for this document
    Account Number with Text
    21301000   Accrued Salaries & Wages   CCTR 14515      ...
    20303998   HR P/R Doc Split                                               ...
    Messages for Document 000008174
    Error in document: HRPAY 0000008174
    The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 0001, not 0057
    Company code 0057 is now closed and has been merged into 0001.  Cost center 14515 in the above doc was populated by my clone of RPCIPE00 and call to my BAdI which retrieved current company and cost center from PA0001.  You can see from above that the 'header' data still shows 0057 and indeed, my version of RPCIPE00 only changes P_ITEM-BUKRS, P_ITEM-KOSTL and P_ITEM-SGTXT.  It looks to me that fm HRPP_TRANSLATE_FICO gets the 'header' company code afresh.  I was planning to leave WPBP-BUKRS (and all other Payroll data) alone (ie, not override company code).
    As for your other question, we post retros to /551 and /552. 
    Thanks again.

Maybe you are looking for