Tax (VAT) Amount rounding to nearest rupee.

Dear Experts,
When ever we are using and VAT tax code its not rounding the Tax Amount to nearest rupee, when I check the parameters of condition type JIP5 the rounding rule is set to commercial rounding still its not rounding to nearest rupee and as per my understanding its rounding it to nearest 10 paise rather than to nearest rupee.
So please suggest how to make it rounding to nearest rupee.
Regards

hI!
You cant rounding off for VAT amount for sales and purchases. The difference amount (digits) in sales document or purchase document will be rounded off with condition type matain in pricing procedure. There is no config setting for this rounding off for VAT calculation. If it necessary, you can contact your ABAP developer. Actually you no need to rounding off that VAT figure. You can rounding off the invoice amount to near rupee with condition type in pricing procedure.

Similar Messages

  • Condition amount less than 1 rupee rounding off to "0"

    Dear Experts,
    We are creating sales order using a BAPI, when the price condition type (PR00) gets the amount less than 1 Rupee (say 0.20) the system is rounding off the amount to ZERO and hence the net value of the item is becoming zero.
    Please help us with any solution available for this issue.
    Regards,
    Sandeep Kulkarni.

    Hi,
    Check the condition type PR00. Normally if there is a rounding rule set or a formula assigned for rounding then this issue occurs. You can check in Tcode v/06 for PR00 if 'Round Rule' is commerical rounding then it should work fine. If it is A (Round up) or B (Round Down), you will happen to hit such issue.
    You can also check the if an Alternative calculation type has been assigned to PR00 in the pricing procedure. This also may have an effect...
    Hope this helps...
    Regards,
    Mukund S

  • Force VAT Amount in A/PInvoices and CreditNotes

    Hi all,
    doesn anybody know how to force VAT amount
    in Service A/P Invoices and Service Credit Notes?
    DI Document Objects oPurchaseInvoices and oPurchaseCreditNotes
    expose only VAT Group Property in which you set the VAT code;
    from this code DI retrives VAT % and perform the calculation of VAT Amount.
    In B1 you can modify VAT amount and make it different from the calculated value.
    I tried indicating Price, Line Total and PriceAfterVAT
    but I obtain strange numbers:
    for example indicating
          Line.Price = 2000
          Line.LineTotal = 2000
          Line.VatGroup = "A2" (20%)
          Line.PriceAfterVAT = 2400.01
    (hoping that DI "understand" that VAT Amount is 400.01)
    I obtain a line with this values:
         Price = 2000.01
         Total = 2000.01
         VAT Amount = 400.002000
         Price Including VAT = 2400.01
    Any idea? is the same problem of post "wrong total in credit note" by Juri Grusdew
    May 2nd?
    thanks for your attention,
    have a nice day/evening/nigth
    francesca

    We have similar problem, try with decimals places in currencies settings or with "round tax amount in Rows" (in Document Settings)

  • Table to read vat amount of MIRO at item level

    Hi,
    I making a purchase register in which all amount rdetais are required at item level  but from tables , RKPF, RSEG, I am getting the base amount at item level,  but in which table I can get the vat amount which is posted for individual item in table BSET  i can see the all tax amounts which are posted but how to link this with item number  there is no ref. field for this.
    is there any table for MIRO entry with item wise tax details.
    regards,
    zafar

    You can simulate VAT calculation via RSEG base amount WRBTR and VAT code MWSKZ ([CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/advancedsearch?query=calculate_tax_item]). But beware of rounding errors in the calculation.
    Remember that the calculation of VAT is the responsibility of the supplier.
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • MIRO- excise and VAT duties Rounding off

    Hi all,
    A PO will have 20 items. Those 10 items will have excise duties and VAT amount. At the time of PO these excise duties and the VAT amount should not get rounded off. But while the user is doing MIRO, the value of these excise duties and the VAT amount should come to the screen as rounded off. Is it possible? If yes please suggest me.
    I am Using TAXINN procedure

    Hi girish,
    We can Bring condition  Round Down and Up but we can't do as you said.See some User Exists are available .
    BR
    Raj

  • Split VAT amount in PO

    Hi Experts,
    Could you please advice How can we Split the VAT amount in Purchase Order
    Our requirement is total PO amount with 60,000..  Please advice how can we resolve the issue.
    Thanks in advance...
    Diggi

    Hi,
    Your Po value is 100000.
    You had created to line item
    1.One with price  80000
    2 Second with  20000
    Now you want the vat should calculate tax on 80000 amount only in PO and not on 20000 that is second line item.
    Better you can enter the Vat tax code for PO line item 1 that is for 80000 and do not assign any tax code for 2 nd line item.
    Here the system calculated the Vat for only 1st line item were you can invoice the same in diff line item.

  • Cash Discount after Tax & VAT

    Hi , Friends,
    My client has a scenario where in some purchase orders , he receives the discount after tax.
    when I add the discount (absolute) after tax in the m/08 , the net price changes and the tax is calculated on this new net price  which is wrong & not required .
    Friends tell me what chnages I need to do so that discount is calculated after Tax & VAt and the ideally what should be the accounting entries in MIGO and MIRO.
    if the gross price is Rs 100
    tax is Rs 10
    and discount is Rs 5.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Dgn,
    What type of industry sector your client belongs to. But as a standard practise, cash discounts are captured before adopting the Tax or VAT through Invoice.
    We will calculate the accounts payable:
    Usually below is the scenario for taking the discounts from the vendor in the process of purchaing:
    will take your given figures/values:
    Eg. (1)
                               Total gross price:      100.00 INR            (as per your client)
                               Discount:                       5.00 INR          (-ve)
                                                                                    95.00 INR
    then adopt, Tax (10%):                             9.50 INR      (10% on gross ( = 9.50 INR)  :   goes to govt. for tax depart.                                                                               
    that means, the total amount:                   85.50 INR      payable to the vendor (A/P)
    But, where as in your case /as per client,
    (2)
    Taking your eg.  Total gross price:      100.00 INR            (as per your client)
                               Tax amount: (10%)     10.00 INR            (10% on gross = 10 INR)    :  goes to govt. for tax depart.
                                                                                    110.00 INR
    then taking,       Discount:                         5.00 INR      (-ve)
    that means, the total amount:                105.00 INR      payable to the vendor (A/P)
    (1):  85.5 INR   <  (2) :  105.00 INR
    So, in 2nd scenario, your client has to pay more to their vendors & also more tax in the process of purchasing compare to the usually procedure (1). Other wise your client has to pay extra 20.00 INR. Hence option 1 is the rightone.
    Pls check with your client again and suggest them further.
    Hope you understood.
    Regards,
    Sapsrin.

  • Withholding tax line amount exceeds message no.7Q320

    Dear all,
    Withholding tax type we are defined as a accumulated type. untill and unless it exceeds the minimum amount system will not calculate the withholding tax once it crosses the minimum amount system will calculate tds from one rupee on words. but now at the time of posting advance payment to vendor the system generates a error namely withholding tax line amount exceeds.
    As per my knowledge i convert the error message into warning even i know this not the good practice but according to situation what i did is correct. at the making those changes the system asks the request (workbench). i save under one new request when i transported to another client the system is generating warnings.
    when i transport the same from develpoment to quality the system generating error. i come to know this is through request status.
    What is the solution for this
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sankar

    Hello
    please go thorugh the menu path:
    spro->img->Fin acct-> Fin acct Global settings->withholding tax->extended withholding tax->calculation->withholding tax types->defien withholding tax type for payment posting
    give ur country key
    double click on your W.T type
    under central invoice option----you have to select radio button for central invoice & 1st p. pmt
    this might solve porblem
    please assing points if usefull
    srinu

  • Mismatching of vat amount

    Hi Guru,
        my client is asking mismatching of vat amount that is -
                                                                 When generate annual VAT report containing assessable value along with tax values for a particular year which should match with purchases values declared in financial statements. The purchase values are arrived in financial statements as "closing stock of raw materials plus consumption of raw materials minus opening stock of raw materials" ;.  We are generating the VAT report  in T code S_ALR_87012385, which provides the purchase values for difference t ax codes. The values generated in this VAT report should match with the purchase values as per financial statements. Now it is not matching with report..
    Please let me know what are the reason it happen.
    It urgent.
    Regards,
    Manas

    Hi,
    VAT value is flowing from purchase order & VAT value depending the tax code available in the purchase order. You can check VAT value as % in FTXP t.code or FV13 with combination of tax code & VAT condition type.
    As you are getting same vale of VAT now in MIRO(same vale of VAT should not come for all PO in MIRO), may be purchase orders are having same quantity. Now just cross check again & again by doing MIRO with other purchase orders without posting, just carry out simulate document, check accounting entries.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Transfer with clearing (F-51) w/o Vat amount.

    Hi,
    I need to transfer with clearing (Tcode F-51) an open vendor item which has an amount of VAT (Gross amount 1210: vendor amount 1000, VAT amount 210).
    The open item was posted with special G/L indicator (down payment), tax code, amount:1000 and vat amount: 210.
    The problem is that I only need to transfer the vendor amount (1000) and not the amount of the vat. 
    When I see the line ítem by Tcode FBL1N I see correct the open item for the amount of 1000. Then, when I try to transfer the amount the system shows me 1210 in the line item.
    Any idea?
    Thanks
    Cecilia

    hi,
    Use T code - F-51
    give posting 31 opposite vendor number (SGL Ind) enter give amount what ever you want to transfer and select Choose open items tab and select vendor code and select Spl gl indicator - Click on Process open item  -  select that particular line item - and go to residual tab given Tax amount then simulate
    check accounting entry and Post
    check in FBL1N both vendors
    Thanking you
    Mahesh

  • Wrong VAT amount in MIRO (Excise duty inclusive case)

    Hi All,
    I have created purchase order with excise duty as inclusive. I have captured the vendor excise invoice & posted  it. Upto this point all is working fine.
    When i am  going to do MIRO ,the vat amount is also showing correct ( calculated on Base price+ ED).
    But when i am changing the tax code ,the VAT is calculated on Base price only.
    It is not considering the amount of Excise duty posted .
    Besides excise duty inclusive case ,when we are changing the tax code in  MIRO where certain percentage for the conditions is maintained like (821+vat 5%) ,VAT amount is correct.Only problem is with the excise duty inclusive cae.
    All the configuration & transaction data is properly maintained .
    Please guide ,
    Regards,
    SAP MM INDIA

    Create a seperate tax code for dealer with ed + vat combination,
    here maintain tax rates for excise condition types as zero.
    Maintain that tax code in p.o.Do GR as suggested in sap note
    See Note 1104456 - Use of MRP indicator for capturing excise duties from dealer for more information.
    In MIRO,Enter base amount removing excise duty values,select tax code only in header.
    Reply given by p.singh is also very important point to note regarding VAT condition type.

  • Re: VAT amount not to be inventorised

    Dear Team
    Here, I am configuring Import Pricing Procedure for Bangaladesh.The Price structure as follows.
    Basic Price A     -
    > 100 USD
    Other Charges B -
    > 1 USD
    So Assesable Value ( A+B) C -
    > 101 USD
    Import Duty 40 %          D    -
    >  40.40 USD
    Amount for  Calculation 
    of VAT          -
    > ( C+D) E  -
    > 141.40 USD
    VAT   10 %  F -
    >   14.14 USD
    Total PO value -
    >  (E+F) G -
    > 155.54 USD.
    Here the requirement is, During GRN, only the value 141.40 USD   has to debited  the material cost.The VAT amount 14.14 USD should not be added to the material cost. This VAT amount has to be separately Debited to one VAT paid account( With automatic Posting only GL Code) during  MIRO.
    Expecting some lights from the TEAM.
    With Regards
    Srinivasan Baskaran

    In order to the vat amount to flow as separate line item to vat payable account u have to do the following
    Create a separate condition type with non-decticble vat  description
    create a PROCESSING key using OBCN
    IN THAT SELECT  posting indicator 3 and tick mark the NON-DEDUCTIBLE.
    In ob40 FI configuring : automatic posting  assign the vat payable g/laccount against the processing key created in the above step
    Now in the tax pricicng procedure include the condtion type and assign the processing key in the Actkey column
    create the tax code and maintain the condition record
    Regards
    P RAMASUBRAMANIAN

  • Vat Amount No Captured in MIGO

    Hi All,
    At the time of Posting MIGO system is calculating Excise Duty only, it is not calculating VAT amount.
    Please let me know the probable reason for the same
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Hi,
    If you maintain tax rates at tax code level then check the account key.
    If you maintain tax rates at condition type level check whether you have maintained for that material or vendor or whatever the access sequence you have maintained.
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Tax Base Amount

    Hi,
    We are trying to enter direct payment into "VAT Output Account" thru GL Document using the T Code FB50. In the GL Master for VAT Output account we have maintained the settings for allowing the direct postings. However, when we enter the amount and simulate, the system prompts for entering the relevant tax code.Under 'Control Tab' in the GL Master we have defined the Tax Category for this GL Account as "Output Tax Account". When we enter the tax code and check the box for calculate tax under the details tab in FB50, the system prompts for the message - Enter Tax Base Amount for GL A/c ___ in Co. Code ____. By clcicking on the Tax Base amount at the bottom the screen appears but when we enter the base amount the messahe appears that ' You are posting directly to a tax account enter the tax base amount using the tax amount function.
    Could you pleadse advise hos is this to be handled. We are able to go thru.
    Thanks in advance.
    Rgds.

    if you use FB50 to post this kind of entry, that is normally manually post the entry in GL entries instead of posting vendor invoice thru AP module.
    For situation A, normally we use this method for the invoice we recevied which indicate net amount, tax amount and taxe code seperately. So it is easier for the user just input the same amount exactly as invoice.
    For situation B, sometimes we received the invoice is total amount, not indicate the net amount, tax amount seperately, just put the total invoice amount. For this situation, it is easier for the user put the total amount and let the system calculated the tax amount automatically and posted seperately to the correspondence GL account.
    Hope it can help you understand.

  • VAT amount

    Dear All,
    my client using TAXINN.
    tax code: V1
    Vat-3%, condition records maintained.
    In PO- item level-Invoice tab-Taxes-VAT 3 % is showing in Amount field. but in filed Condition value is showing Zero for Vat 3%.
    e.g
    base price= Rs. 300
    VAT 3% = 9
    in system showing  only 3%, & condition value is Zero( actually Rs.9)
    but for service tax is showing all values.
    please let me know

    Hi,
    Please check your configuration for the Condition Type used.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to make a mobile content in flash

    plze does any one know how to make a mobile content in flash

  • Changing into parent-child relation

    Hi, I have a table which has the following fields and the table gives the identifier for parent-child relation: ID PARENT ID structure parentkey_field foreignkey_field Fields[] data[] 1.ID is the numbering like 1,2,3... 2.PARENT ID will give the rela

  • Target cost in KSS1

    I am checking KKS1 report(testrun for period 7 2011), i noted the variance % column not reflecting right % , may i know why? For example for process order 100028687 the variance % compare with actual cost should be  8.6% but  shown as 0%  please guid

  • How to use MSCOMM with teststand

    Hello All,        I want to communicate with serial port via MSCOMM component in teststand,And I have already regestered MSCOMM in PC.But I can't find it in "automation server" on the module tab.        Look forward to your reply.Thanks. BR

  • Reason for rejection during "Tech Response & Awards"

    Hi, SRM 7.0 PPS: We have seen that, In 2 envelope RFx Response, when a bid is accepted/rejected  duing the tech bid response and awards, the system sends a mail to him. Here, if the bid was rejected, we want to include the "Reason for Rejection", in