TBB1 and TBB1_LC

Once a Trsy transaction is created, settled and TBB1'd and say the outgoing leg has been paid to a bank, a need might arise to change an incorrect interest rate without doing TPM10 to reverse the initial posting. We have a policy not to reverse the FI posting once the funds have moved successfully to the bank and were not rejected by the bank.
If the settlement step is reversed, the interest rate field can be changed and then saved and resettled. Since this instrument accounts for the interest earned at maturity and the principal and interest have not been booked (via TBB1), if TBB1 is done again a duplicate original posting will occur even though TPM20 shows that this entry has already been booked.
If TBB1_LC (module only) is used for only the original posting, the duplicate posting is avoided but it shows on TPM20.
Question:
1) TBB1_LC and TBB1 postings show up on TPM20. If accounting tries to make sure the sub-ledger (Trsy Module) is in sync with the FI ledger, the TPM20 actually has an extra posting shown for the TBB1_LC transaction, albeit without an FI document of course. So, is there any other way to do this type of field correction without ending up with the extra transaction showing in TPM20 that was created by TBB1_LC?'
Thank you.
Ron Pruitt

Hi Ron,
let me explain the purpose of transaction TBB1_LC in brief - this one is used normally only in case of data migration from so called the Legacy system to SAP and is called 'Flag Flows as Posted'. It might happen, that some flows of open deals exist prior a Key migration date. However this information is already inluded/ inherited in the Balance sheet taken from the Legacy system to SAP, so you don't intend to post to G/L twice. So, only for those flows before a key date you use TBB1_LC, which fully corresponds to TBB1, except that TBB1_LC does not generate any general ledger documents, also you will not find any reference and FI document numbers. Also, in the posting journal - report TPM20 - you will see the flows, however you do not find any references into general ledger.
I agree, that in your situation, there is no sense to reverse the settlement of the whole deal, when you might need to correct some interest flow, with is not posted yet. Depending on the type of changes, it might be enough just to change the interest flow (trans. FTR_EDIT ).
now, regarding duplicates - if you follow the process, this is not exactly true, cause if you reverse settlement for the whole deal or reverse some flows of it, the respective existing postings get different status, like 'to be reversed'. You need to execute TPM10 to generate reversal documents. so, when you settle the new version of deal or update previously reversed fows, you should again post required flows when relevant and you get the new up-to-date financial documents. There is a selection in TPM20, what kind of flows you want to see - 'Posted Business Transactions', 'Reversed Business Transactions' or some combination of mentioned above, so you can report over all situations.
hope this will help you.
Rgds,
Renatas

Similar Messages

How do I default valuation area to post all valuation area in TBB1 or TBB4

Dear All,
How do I default valuation area to 'Post All Valuation Area' when I run TBB1 or TBB4 or any other Treasury T-Code (that has these 2 valuation areas as option)? Currently, by default, SAP is pointing to Post Operative Area. What is required by the user is to post ALL Treasury transactions to All Valuation Areas. Therefore, they have to remember to change from 'Post Operative Area' to 'Post All Valuation Area'. If they do not change this, it will be a mistake and they have to reverse the transaction and re-post again.
We have suggested to them to use Variants but again, they have to remember to choose the correct variant when they use these T-codes. Otherwise, the same thing will happen - wrong posting -> they have to reverse and re-post. Or, is there an option where we can default a variant when they use these T-codes?
Please assist. Thanks.
Regards
Fauzi

Hi,
In all standard transactions the default option will be to post to operative valuation area only.
I can think of a round about solution. Create a variant for TBB1 and save it with name space CUS& which means it is a customer created variant and also it will be transported to other systems by default. In this variant choose the option post all valuation area.
Then create a Z transaction for TBB1 with this variant as default in SE93. Now when you execute that Z transaction you will have post all valuation areas by default.
Please let me know if you can find a better solution.
Regards,
Ravi

F111 cannot create batch

Dear all,
I have problem with F111 recently as well.
In general I always post the deals via TBB1 and then create payment batches via F111. But recently I cannot even start Payment Proposal.
Now I always get red alert as "Payment proposal could not be carried out". All my parameter is just the same as I usually do!
Anyone has any suggestion?
Thanks!

Hi,
Are you trying to process a Foreign Currency?
If yes, then please check the Vendor Master Data contains Bank Key / Bank Account for which SWIFT Code is Activated.
Else same Error is Encountered.
Also check OB08 and OBBS tables are Maintained Properly for Exchange Rates Upload.
Else if this is a Normal Scenario - Only Possibility - Select F4 functionality for F111 Run Date and Check if any Proposal is Struck in the Stack with Same Master Data Properties.
Hope This Helps.
Basudev Parida

Separate Product type with only partial flows accounting

Hello,
We have a requirement for mapping the product of Guarantees in Treasury module.
As per the requirement, these guarantees do not need any accounting except for commission / charges. These need to be tracked and hence are defined as a separate product type in 510 category. However while checking the SAP configuration options, it is observed that there is a possibility to exlude product types from accounting or some update types from accounting.
As can be seen from the requirement, the requirement is not to have any accounting only for guarantee amount but accounting for commission is required.
Hence of the 2 options available for excluding accounting viz. product type or update type, none can be used for mapping this requirement.
Please help.

Hi,
You can get the reqd function by setting a new product type-transaction type-flow type-update type for guarantee, of this mark all the update types except commission for not relevant for posting in below settings:
spro-trm-trans mgr-gen settings-accounting-update type relevant for posting.
By doing this only commission flows will be posted with Tcode - TBB1, and guarantee flows will remain in report TPM13 for information purpose.
Hope this clarifies your reqmt.
Regards
Prasad AV

Years of Treasury transactions lost (TM_55)

Our Treasury team was trying to post a debt service payment for our fiscal year-end. They posted to the wrong date when the cash was sent to the trustee. They tried to reverse the one posting error by using TM_55. What the system did was reverse the entire life of the bond/transaction. Every treasury transaction since Go Live was reversed. Every accrual and debt service payment, including the accruals for cost of issuance and premium are gone. However, the GL transactions in accounting were not affected.
We cannot re-run these postings and accruals as we normally do because this would create entries in the GL.
The history of interest rate instrument (TM_59) is now empty. We can still see the data if we run a TPM10, but donu2019t know how to bring it back into treasury. The lost debts transactions have the status "reversed" in TPM10.
Any suggestion to fix the problem and get the data back into treasury would be greatly appreciate
Thanks!
Melanie
Edited by: Melanie Burgener on Oct 22, 2008 3:26 PM

hi
you can create the transaction again and than go to transaction TBB1 and in the "posting date" post all the history to the current date and then in FI do storno
what do you say?
meir

Error in TPM1

Hi,
We have execute TPM1 for product type 70A - Securities Futures (Listed derivatives) system shows following error.
Scheduled bus. trans. with posting date 08.01.2010 before key date (long text)
Message no. TPM_TLV1017
We have alreary run TBB1 and TPM18 and posting & fixed all flow.
Regards,
Vishal

Hi,
We check TPM12 report and Incoming Close Margin is not fixed.
Please advice to fixed Incoming Close Margin.
Regards,
Vishal Patel

TX01, - incorrect calcualte amount in local currency upgrade 4.7- ECC6.0

Hello, Gurus,
I've problem with currency transaction, especially with additional flows
When I created currency forward and I add additional flows :
1) 0011      +    1.000.000 EUR   ( exchange rate fixed 4,00)
2) 0011      -     4.000.000 PLN
And I saved transaction
then I post this flows: using TBB1 :
And system try post :
flow 1) 1.000.000,00 EUR   -> 4.000.000 PLN - this is correct
flow 2) 1.007.556,68 EUR   -> 4.000.000PLN - this is incorrect
Why system try calculate second flow despite that in additional flow was set as PLN ?
This situation was after upgrade to ECC 6.0
In previous version of system second flow was posted:
flow2) 4.000.000PLN    -> 4.000.000PLN
Could you help me
*PLN is local currency

Hi,
to avoid inconsistencies, the system posts all flows in position currency and, if necessary, the amount in local currency is recalculated with rates to the posting date. If you would like to keep the same rate, then in the transaction you should also fix the rate for the PLN flow.
Regards,
Tomislav

Transaction FTR_CREATE and TBB1 -BADI needed

HI,
We have a requirement,the issue is that FI document is not getting generated and the system shows error message while posting the entries using Tcode TBB1 for product type 55G. The accounting entries involve postings to GL accounts for which Trading partner field is a required entry field. Because of this reason, system is showing error while posting the document thro TBB1 tcode.
In order to solve this issue, we need to identify user exit/BADI which fetches a field in FTR_edit (this is the master data maintenance tcode based on which postings are done thro TBB1 to FI) that will help in populating trading partner field VBUND in FI document which is created via T code TBB1.
Regards,
Rama

Hi,
The BADI for FTR_CREATE is ADDR_PRINTFORM_SHORT and it's implementation is CL_EX_ADDR_PRINTFORM_SHORT.
There is an even quicker way to finding a BADI and BADI implementations for any transaction:
1.Go to SE37 display Function Module - SXV_GET_CLIF_BY_NAME.
2.Set a BREAKPOINT on call function SXV_ADD_PREFIX .
3.In another SESSION run the desired transaction, parameter 'name' gives the BADI; parameter 'clif ' gives implementation, e.g. for T-Code MIGO name = MB_MIGO_BADI, clif = CL_EX_MB_MIGO_BADI .
Regards,
Mukesh.

Derived business transactions and TBB1

Dear experts,
My question concerns Money Market derived business transactions.
When I enter position outflows that are not transfer postings, the system generates derived translations that update the position components (proportionate reduction) u2013 DBT_E001/DBT_E002.
These translations are not relevant for posting, but have a status Planned.
The question: is it possible to fix these derived flows during posting of operative business transactions in TBB1?
Right now I can fix them only through TPM18, which is very inconvenient to run separately.
Any help would be appreciated.
Best wishes,
Irina

Hi,
In status control the setting is status of plan and hence the derived transactions will always be generated in planned status and you have to fix them through TPM18.
In order to post it through TBB1 itself, the control setting should have same status option. But check with the business also whether this is not going to have any other effect because this is at the central company code and valuation area level. All derived transactions will have the same status of the operative transactions itself.
Regards,
Ravi

LTD reversed and all condtion types are gone

Hi ,
We have a LTD transaction since 2008 and we are using conditions to manage the interest. Last week the business user input a wrong date in condition and instead of deleting the condition she reversed/unsettle the whole transaction. now all the previous conditions are gone from the transaction. we tried to add all those condition type back and it allows us to do that but i know when we run TBB1 at the end of month all these condition type will get posted with the principal amount.
My Questions, Is there any way of doing this where i can add all the previous condition type (without getting posted) and it will just post the going forward conditions ?
Any help is much

Hi,
Please use Tcode - TBB1_LC which will not post any flows to FI but clear all scheduled flows of a transaction and show as posted. Further, for reversing a wrongly set condition flows, better you do the reversal for only that flow by reversing it from cash flow (reverse mode) in change transaction view if it is with product category - 550 under money market.
Meanwhile which product category is used for the transaction?
Regards
Prasad AV

TRM: doubts in interest rate instrument and Business partner

Dear all,
While implementing Treasury Risk Management, in order to fulfill my clientsu2019 needs I have three questions regarding, 1. Interest rate instruments, 2.Leasings and 3.Business partners.
1.When creating a contract of an interest rate instrument , associated to a floating interest rate (e.g. EURIBOR 3M), how can I calculate the tax stamp which represents 4% of my interest rate amount, and occurs every time I have to pay interests?
I could define it in the u201Cother flowsu201D label but since the contract is associated to a variable, I never know how much my 4% of tax stamp calculated over the interest amount will represent.
2.When creating leasing contracts, how can I calculate the VAT associated to the periodic payments?
3.Is there any way to make postings to a business partner directly as a Vendor or a costumer?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Daniel

Hi,
Please consider following:
1. Generally TDS flows are generated automatically by system based on a revenue/expense flow. By configuring Derived FLows in system you can achieve this. Then alongwith every interest payment flow a TDS flow also will be generated based on the rate defined in system with seperate flow type, you can define account posting in spro.
The path for config- TRM-Trans Mgr- Money Market-Transaction Mgt- Flow Types- Derived FLows
2. Again since VAT is a derived flow for an actual cash flow, so you can achive this through derived flows config.
3. You can make posting to Business Partner account by performing following:
a. In master data, assign role of Customer to the Business Partner
b. Make payment settings in transaction to Customer and select payee/counterparty. While posting with TBB1, entries will be against Customer A/c and further clearing will be reqd at customer level against respective payment bank.
c. To achieve this output, you may require to define account determination accordingly for customers.
I suggest to post seperate thread for each issue rather than posting with single thread for better response.
Regards
Prasad AV

Issue with TBB1

All:
When I run TBB1, I am getting an error saying that Account AABBCC does not exist in company code NNNN. Problem is that I have mistakenly assigned GL account AABBCC in configuration and now I cannot find where it was.
Normally, one side of correspoding GL journal posting is configured in Define Account Determination (IMG -> ... -> Link to Other Accounting Components): Assignment of G/L Accounts to Account Symbols. So question is where is GL acccount for other side is configured?
Other way of checking this is via TM02 -> Environment: Position Indicator -> Cash Flow -> Posting Journal. This shows both sides of GL transaction to be posted. Note: this is for posted transactions only.
Thanks,
JS

ok, I admit -- my phrasing of the question can be improved. But surely there is someone who knows this simple configuration.
FYI: standard SAP companies has G/L account 194400 TR-TM clearing payment transactions mapped at this point.
Any idea?

Tbb1 - changing profit center in FI document account

Dear all,
i need to change the profit center and the movement type when i create the document account with transaction TBB1.
movement type: I CHANGED THE METHOD ACCIT_RMVCT_EXIT IN INTERFACE IF_EX_TPM_ACCIF_TRAC And it is ok.
prctr : I created a new method in interface class but for changing interface i need a development key; is there something that i can do to change prctr or i need to change standard sap ?
thanks a lot
Elena

Hi Elena,
Probably the class is doing its job OK but FI is not accepting the document because some field is missing. In most SAP implementations I have seen, the profit center is not informed directly. Instead, you inform the cost center and the system determines the profit center automatically. Can you check if the cost center field is filled in the ACCIT structure when itu2019s sent to FI? Iu2019m thinking some information needed by the CO module in order to post to a profit center is missing.
Regards,
Daniel
Edited by: dmfdmf77 on Mar 30, 2011 12:43 PM

Problem with accounting in group currency ( tbb1 )

Dear all,
to use the group currency, we created a new valuation area.
In case of a new exchange rate we need to account transactions in the correct way; to do this we applied sap notes:
- 1526242 u2013 TBB1: Incorrect amount in valuation
- 1407845 u2013 TPM18: Incorrect amount in valuation currency
but the document created are with the old exchange rate.
Some of you can tell me if there is something else to do ?
Thanks.
Elena

Hi Elena,
...which setting have you choosen in customizing (TRM > General Settings > Accounting > Organization > Assign Accounting Codes and Valuation Areas)?
See F1-Help for field Translation:
"_" Different Valuation Currency: The amount in valuation currency is only translated if the valuation currency is different to the local currency. If the valuation currency and local currency are the same, the amount is transferred.
"1" Always Translate: The amount in valuation currency is always translated from the amount in position currency
"2" If the amount is not fixed: The valuation currency is usually translated from the amount in position currency, like the always translate setting. If you have fixed the amount in local currency or the exchange rate of the payment to local currency in transaction management, the amount in local currency is transferred.
Regards,
Lorenz

System is not picking bank out going account in TBB1

Hi All,
I am facing the problem in TBB1 accounting entries, system is picking the bank main account (From House bank/account id assigned GL) Not picking Bank out going account from account determination
Example:
Accounting entry at the time of TBB1: (Term start)
Wrong entry
Dr. Fixed Term Deposit GL account
Cr. Bank Main account (Which is assigned in House bank/account ID)
Correct accounting entry should be like this:
Dr. Fixed Term Deposit GL account
Cr. Bank out going account
I have checked the Payment configuration but still not able to identify the issue
Thank in advance for your help and support
Regards,
MS

Hi Ravi,
I was going through your reply.
I needed some clarity on my understanding please confirm it.
Suppose Bank Account is : 113150 ( Created in FS00)
Bank Clearing Account for Treasury Clearing purpose is 114150 (not yet created in FS00)
Bank Clearing for non treasury clearing purpose is 112150 (created in FS00)
in my account determination of TRM I have maintained masking as ++++++4+++
then in this case when posting happens Account picked up will be 114150 based on my House Bank detail in payment tab.
Although 114150 is not created in FS00 and not maintained in T042Y in FBZP. and system will throw error.
Am I right?
Please confirm the understanding.

TBB1 and TBB1_LC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for