Tcode ME21N u2013 How to check PO Actual Cost (Including Taxes)

In ME21N, I am implementing an enhancement using a new CUSTOMER DATA tab. I want to check the total Gross amount of PO when I am in the CUSTOMER DATA TAB. PO is not saved yet. I can see the gross value in CONDITIONS tab.
How I can find the total gross amount. In which structure it is stored.
Please help.

you can see at the header level condition tab of the PO.

Similar Messages

ABAP MM: Tcode ME21N u2013 How to check PO Actual Cost (Including Taxes)

In ME21N, I am implementing an enhancement using a new CUSTOMER DATA tab. I want to check the total Gross amount of PO when I am in the CUSTOMER DATA TAB. PO is not saved yet. I can see the gross value in CONDITIONS tab.
How I can find the total gross amount. In which structure it is stored.
Please help.

Hi,
Not sure to understand very well what you're requirement.
Have you tried enhancement: MEREQ001
User Exit: EXIT_SAPMM06E_006
Regards,
Gilberto Li

ABAP MM: In ME21N which internal table holds Actual Price (Including Taxes)

Using tcode ME21N, while creating new PO, which internal table holds Actual price (Including Taxes) of whole PO (not by item) , assuming PO is not saved.
In the program, I want to capture the total cost of whole PO including taxes as soon as user enter the items. So that I can make some processing according to the total amount of PO.
Thanks,

Check the internal table lt_mepoaccounts field netpr.

How to check CO actual activity allocation for a internal order?

Hello Experts,
I have a question about the report S_ALR_87100185. When I check this report, I found that there is a WBS actual cost value(100 USD) posted to February 2008,but its created date and posting date is in May 2008. In the table RPSCO, there are two records, please refer to below figure.
Budget type KOAR:
   Period 4: -120 USD
   Period 5: -100 USD
Budget type RKL:
   Period 2: 100 USD
   Peirod 4: 120 USD
Who can tell me why the actual cost can posted to February, and how do I check it?
Thank you so much and best wishes,
Maria

The values that are appearing in Feb in the report are actually values of period 2 (Fiscal month May) i.e., 100 USD.
In the report which is based on form 3CST1- Actual Costs Period has got the column headings are hard texted as January, February etc., and the values that appear in month febraury are picked for period values of 2.
You can go ahead and change (T Code CJE6) the column heading description where you can start replacing January with April (Fiscal year start) and so on.
Regards
Sreenivas

How to check for transportation cost is greater then delivery cost??

Hi all,
My customer dont want to be billed if the cost of the delivery is lesser then the transportation cost...
i.e if the total delivery cost is $1000..
and transport cost is $1200
then what check should put in the configuration???
please reply ASAP...

hi Deep Blue
you need to check use the user exit of delivery save. It seems that you need check the route in delivery by that you can check the delivery cost for that route and taking reference of the sales order of the item you need to find out the billing value after comparing you cand decided on saving the delivery document.
Just try if you require any more input please let me know

How to find the Actual Cost & NR of a material

Hi experts,
Can anybody tell me the table from which I can come to know the actual cost of the material and also the actual NR.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Shakeel,
Go to Se16n transaction
and select EKBE table, there u will find so many field ranges, restrict it as u like
u can get it there
regards,
subbu

Help! how to check the SQL run in Oracle?

Hi all,
I have a problem. the developer said the SQL written in Java code are not the one executed in Oracle DB. that mean the query is some how manipulated by some PL/SQL so the final query run in Oracle is different. So can someone teach me how to check the actual SQL run in Oracle?
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Jason

Hi Michel Thanks. But it looks like the query stored in v$sqlarea is not the final executable SQL. for example, the code in application is "select column_A from default_table where column_A = ?" and this ? will be given some value in run time. the query stored in v$sqlarea will be like "select column_A from default_table where column_A = :1"... what is this :1?
Also if some PL/SQL procedure appends some condition to the SQL, is it possible to view the full query from database side?
ok, let me try trace and tkprof first.

How to Post Actual Costs for Overhead

Hi All,
Kindly let me know the steps or T-Code as to how to post the actual costs for the Overheads.

Hi
Use the t.code KGI2 and post the actual costs for the Overheads.
Award points if it is useful.
Thanks & Regards,
A.Anandarajan.

Table of Actual cost of production

Hi Experts,
I m developing one Z report for our client which shud contain Standard cost & Actual cost of production of the sold material for that particular month.
I am following KKBC_PKO tcode for the same.
Standard cost & Actual cost has a part of secondary cost element.
Can I know which table will have Actual cost details to present in above mentioned report??
Thanks in Advance.
Madhu.

Dear Madhu,
Table COEP will help you to check the actual cost.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

We want to post actual cost through statistical WBS elements.

when we do the posting on Costcenter assigned to a Statistical WBS element (2nd level), I was in the opinion that, the actual cost posted on the Costcenter of statistical WBS (2nd level) will reflect to the top WBS element (which is non-statistical in 1st level).
But, I cannot able to see the actual cost in the 1st level WBS which also a Billing element (with this, finally we want to do the Resource Related Billing).
So expalin me how to bring actual cost posted on the costcenter of a Statistical WBS, to top WBS element which is non-statistical.

U can book the actual cost from Procurement Cycle or by direct Invoice posting using FI transaction.
Procurement Cycle:
When you create PR or PO user Account Assignment Q or P and maintain WBS element. When u do GR or service entry actual cost is captured on the Project (WBS element).
Using FI Transaction:
When there is no PO and to book the cost u can use F-43 to post actual cost (via Invoice) and mention WBS element.
U can check the Actual Cost using Line item report CJI3 or S_ALR_87013532.
Venkat

Actual Cost Distribution

hi experts,
i created a distribution cycle both planned and actual , but while tyring to allocate cost to desired cost center it takes into consideration only the planned value. will somebody tell me how can i allocate actual cost to the reciever cost center
regards
maryam

Hi Abdul,
You need to create the Distribution Cycle for Plan and Actual seperately. Creation of Plan Distribution Cycle - KSV7 and Creation of Actual Distribution Cycle - KSV1. Pls check if you have done it.
When you create the Actual Distribution Cycle, in each segment, you need to select the radio button "Act.Vals" under "Sender Values". Pls check if you have done this. And also check if there are any actual postings happened to the Sender Cost Centers in the cycle. (Use KSB1 transaction code).
Pls check and revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Sales order costing - tracking of actual costs at sales order item level

Hi
We are going with sales order costing for services
Service material is non-valuated hence the scenario is non-valuated sales order stock
PP module is not implemented.
I am having following questions
1. How to track the actual costs at sales order item level? Is Internal order/CO production order is required to be created for the same?
2. Can I do activity confirmations directly from cost center to sales order item.
3. Can Raw material is issued directly against sales order item.
4. Is Sales order is a real or statistical account assignment object?

dear friend,
please look here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/42/d7248ab27111d19e9a080009b0db33/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/90/ba6cfb446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
reagrds,

Internal Order - KOB1 - Actual Cost Line Item Report

Hi Friends,
I need to understand how the KOB1 Report - Actual Cost Line Item works.
As per my understanding when ever there is cost posted with assignment to Internal order this report should reflect the amount.
We have a PO with account assignment to Internal order and Asset.
When Goods Receipts is posted the with posting key 70, the report is reflecting the amount.
When Invoice Receipt is posted KOB1 report is not reflecting this amount.
There is one Invoice receipt posted with entry
31 Dr
70 DR
86 Dr GR/IR
and the 70 debit amount is coming in the report.
So can any one please tell me does this report show all the entries with IO assignment or when posting key 70, 75 ,80,81 are used.
And also is GR considered as cost posting or IR considered.
This issue has been pending from 3 months.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks
Satish

The KOB1 line item report will show you any expense account posted to that order.
Basically you are the order collecting the cost. During the invoice receipt, the expense account are not involved, except in cases of a price difference.
The vendor account credit and debit to GR/IR are not concerned with the order.

Material Ledger Active - K088 Settlement doesnt use Actual Cost Comp Split

Production Order quantities are all scrap (in confirmation) thus order balance contains Consumed Materials and Activity Allocation
When KO88 Settlement is run, the system uses Standard Cost Component Split to allocate the residual to Cost Components instead of the Actual Cost Component Split
When we run the flow trace, the message says:
"Splitting according to output material S-Price CCS"
Expectation was that costs would flow according to Actual Cost Component split.
There is note 756167 - This note activates the update of the actual cost component split information in the material ledger document when you perform the order settlements.
However current release is 604, so its expected that this is already applied.
Any help or insight on how to settle using Actual Cost Component split is appreciated.
Edited by: Chris Gibson on May 5, 2010 8:57 PM
Edited by: Chris Gibson on May 5, 2010 8:59 PM

The second option you mentioned of using separate value field for transferring the standard cost component split from the actual cost component split is the way SAP designed this integration between CO-PA and the Material Ledger. But 40 value field for cost component split is excessive. CO-PA allows up to 120 value fields maximum, so I agree it does not seem prudent to use 80 of them for this purpose.
I suggest you reexamine the level of detail you think may be needed in CO-PA and try to use CO-PC reports at the cost element level to report on more detail. Keep the CO-PA view more aggregated and you can stick with the standard solution for comparing standard to actual costs in CO-PA.
Best regards,
Jeffrey Holdeman

Actual Cost in PS

How we assign the actual cost to the project ?

Please read the forum rules before you post such queries. Refer SAP Help for such basic queries.

Tcode ME21N u2013 How to check PO Actual Cost (Including Taxes)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for