Sales order costing - tracking of actual costs at sales order item level

Hi
We are going with sales order costing for services
Service material is non-valuated hence the scenario is non-valuated sales order stock
PP module is not implemented.
I am having following questions
1. How to track the actual costs at sales order item level? Is Internal order/CO production order is required to be created for the same?
2. Can I do activity confirmations directly from cost center to sales order item.
3. Can Raw material is issued directly against sales order item.
4. Is Sales order is a real or statistical account assignment object?

dear friend,
please look here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/42/d7248ab27111d19e9a080009b0db33/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/90/ba6cfb446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
reagrds,

Similar Messages

  • IW33 : Good Issue but Cost show in Plan Cost instead of Actual Cost

    Hi All,
    Would like have your helping hand on below issue.
    Warranty Order been done the Good Issue but the cost still planning in plan cost instead of actually cost.
    Information as shown below.
    Thank you advise in advance.
    Trevor Wong.

    Abi,
    Can you see that there is a difference in the the actual costs reported on the Cost tab (350 RM), and those reported using the Rep Plan/Act button (1100RM).
    This is because the Cost tab costs are not correct.
    As pointed out by Maheswaran KD above, please run the correction program RIPMCO00 via transaction SE38/SA38, then check the Cost tab data again.
    PeteA

  • Updating Unit Cost by using Actual Cost Adjustments

    Hi,
    How can we adjust Unit Cost by using Actual Cost Adjustments Window?
    By giving Cost Adjustment without giving Adjustment Qty, the amount was adjusted to total quantity (transacted during the period). But I want to increase unit cost by a fixed amount. Is there any option?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ram

    Hi Ram,
    there are some patches released by oracle 5-6 months back(5003789 and 4735489) having this feature.
    There is also a meatalink note is available,expalins this cost adjustment type called Unit Cost Adjustment.This is the way it works.....
    The Actual Cost process now supports this new adjustment type where you adjust
    the actual unit cost of the item with the specified cost. The Actual Cost process
    calculates the cost of the item per the current logic and then applies this unit cost
    adjustment to calculate the new adjusted cost. This adjusted cost becomes the new actual cost of the item.First the New Unit Cost (without the Unit Cost Adjustment) is calculated.The Unit Cost Adjustment is included only after the Actual Cost is calculated based on the existing Adjustment types. Then, the New Unit Cost (with the Unit CostAdjustment) is calculated.
    Hope this helps...
    Rgds
    Shajahan

  • Production Order wise List for  Target cost v/s Actual cost

    Dear Sir,
    We have make to order scenario . We want to have a list giving Production Order wise "Target Cost" and "Actual Cost" . The purpose of list is to analyze the Variances Production Order wise .
    I request to kindly guide us , how can the above list be generated please .
    Regards
    B Mittal

    KKBC_HOE - With Defined Summarization Hierarchy
    S_ALR_87013104 - Sales Order Selection
    KKAC - For Sales Order with Assigned Orders
    KVBI - Actual Costs
    KOB3 - Variances

  • Internal orders to track rev and cost

    Hi
    How to track revenue and cost, related to utilization of land using internal order and offset revenue against cost..
    Pls advice? What we can use on this statistical internal order on real internal order ????
    Pls advice in details ... Thank you in advance

    HI,
    If at all you want to use Internal order for this purpose, you have to create a real internal order only for settlement purpose.  Statistical IO can not be settled.
    Try once.
    Regards
    Sarma BH

  • KKS2 ran for future periods; Target costs double the actual costs

    Hi
    Variance calculation was accidentally run for period 011/2012 and it affected several orders in that the target costs are showing double the actual costs (period 01 + period 11) of year 2012.
    Is there some report in SAp that would give us a list of orders for which KKS2 (variance calc) was run for period 11 2012.
    Best wishes
    Raj.

    hi
    Thanks for your responses. But nothing has answered my question
    Is there a report in SAp that could give me a list of all orders for which variance calculation was run for period 11 2012?
    I used several reports including KOB3 and s_alr_87013140 but nothing gives me that list.
    Thanks in advance for your replies.

  • COPA Costing key for actual cost component split

    Hi,
    I would like to allow the users to specify different period/year in the following screen every month when they do the COPA revaluation. However i noticed this screen is part of customization and cannot be changed by the users without a transport. As such how can we allow the users to change the period/year by themselves every month?

    Hi Sanjay Ram,
    Whatever the marked one i.e. period/year is used especially when you want to consider the PUP or actual cost the material for that specific period only. As you know it can not be changed in every period.
    So, for that purpose only we have the above one i.e. period a/c to line item, by this system is going to pick the PUP or actual cost of the specific period for which the line item has taken place (the line item that may be billing or settlement)
    Regards..
    Jose

  • Incoterms in sales order: part 2 is not taken from header to item level

    Dears,
    I got a customer with incoterm DDP in part 1 and a city "Hamburg" in part 2.
    When I create a sales order, I change part 2 from "Hamburg" into "Berlin" before I insert items.
    Unfortunately the changed content ("Berlin") is not taken to item level, there is still standing "Hamburg".
    I haven't found any solution for that behaviour.
    I hope, any one can answer how to solve that.
    Many thanks.
    Chris

    Thanks for reply.
    The flag is already checked, so there must be another reason.
    But, in the meantime, I found out, that there is a difference between some users.
    Some users can change the incoterm at item level, some others cannot.
    What could be the reason? Some profile settings?

  • Sales order status "Being processed" due to "Not referenced" in Item level.

    Hi All,
    I am facing with document status issue.
    I have the following process,
    1) Main contract (without line items )--> Yearly Contract-->Billing--> Renewal contract w.r.to First Year contract and this renewals will continue until the customer cancel the order.
    Status will be as below,
    Main Contract                   – No status ( Since, no item category referred in Copy control)
    1 Year contract                 – Being processed.
    1Year Billing                        - completed.
    2nd year contract               – Being processed.
    2nd Year Billing                    - completed.
    Config settings:
    In item category – Completion rule =  C Item is completed after the target qty is fully referenced
    In VTFA :In item level :
    Billing qty = A     Order quantity less invoiced quantity
    Pos./neg. quantity = +
    Please advice to overcome this.
    FYI:In contract line item --> status tab.

    Hi Moazzam,
    Thanks for the reply..
    A is : Item is completed with the first reference. i will try with this but needs to check with the business if they have any partial qty might refer for Invoice.
    But, as per existing config.
    C - Item is completed after the target qty is fully referenced.
    Which i am doing / referring for Invoice full qty. but i am getting " Not referenced" . Request to please make me understand the C functionality.- thanks.

  • Planned vs Actual Cost Report (with variance) for PM Orders

    Hi Experts,
    We are using the project system to collate order costs for annual shut work.  We have a requirement for a report to show 25% variance between planned and actual order costs (maintneance order).
    At this stage, we dont mind whether this is implemented in the the PM system, or the PS system.
    This is a fairly basic / common requirment.  Are there any standard transactions we could use to:
    1.  Select a list of orders using standard selection criteria.
    2.  Select a % for variance, e.g. 25%
    3.  Display a list of orders where the planned vs actual costs were greater than 25% and what the actual variance is for each order?
    Thanks,
    Maikel

    Hi Maikel,
                   I have never seen any such scenario, but the best thing that can come to me is for the shut down activities you muct have created a Revision, then based on that Revision you can take a dump of all the orders with Planned and Actual Cost, in the excel, and there by putting the formulae you can definitely have the Varience report.
    Hope it helps you.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

  • Standard Vs Actual Cost report for Production Order

    Hi Expert,
    I have an requirement that i need report for Standard Cost (CK40N) and Actual cost (261 Movement) for multiple production order or Multiple Material.
    Please suggest standard report if available or FS for creating Z Report.
    Regards,
    Pranav

    Hi Pranav
    There are Standard reports
    Option 1
    You can use Product Drilldown reports in KKO0
    For this:-
    a. Do settings in OKN0 - assign a Cost Comp Structure and Choose Material group = Product Group
    b. Run KKRV to collect data and then use KKO0 reports
    I have replied this in SCN many times.. You can search here. Just google as "SCN" "Ajay Maheshwari" "OKN0" and you can see some posts answered by me
    Option 2
    You can use Summarization Hierarchy KKBC_HOE
    For this
    a. Set up Summ Hierarchy in KKR0.
    b. Run KKRC
    c. Run KKBC_HOE report
    Br Ajay M

  • Actual Costing in Production Order

    Dear All,
    We are in Production Client.I have created cost estimate and moved to material master.
    PP has created a production Order and confirmed the activities.
    When I view the costs from CO03,i can see the target costs perfectly,but actual costs are not apprearing in the order.
    We have 6 activity types and out of 6 ,we have costs for 5 activities and for the remaining 1 activity ,plan qty is maintained ,but there is no plan cost.Is because of this ,actaul costs are not coming in to order? Or any thing is missed out ?  
    Please share any idea on this issue as we are in production.
    Regards
    Su

    Dear Mr Ajay,
    Sorry for the information given in the previous one as I have given wrong Order No.while checking.
    I have checked once again with the correct order.When I checked COFC ,System has given the error messages for the Setup activity type for which price is not available in the system as no costs are planned for the activity type as we don't  have setup hours for this month,but qty is planned and PP has confirmed the set up qty.
    Is because of this issue ,actual costs did not appear in the order?
    To my knowledge ,as I said we have 6 activity types,out of which there is no cost for setup,hence system is throwing a error for no price for that activity.
    But the system can capture the actaul costs for the remaing 5 activities for which prices are available.
    Regards
    Su

  • Price differenc value in Actual cost of Production

    Hi,
    We are creating a production order for Billets that is our Semifinished goods. The material master is maintained at Std price.
    Lets say that Std prce of the Billet is 100.
    Lets say that after the production order is completed , the actual cost of Billet is comes out to be 125.
    Now this billet is used for the production of the finished goods Wires. For the production order of wires, the price of the billet is taken as 100. 
    In this way the actual cost of the Wire will not come.
    May be this is the standrad process. Let me know in any way can we use price difference of 125-100= 25 in the production cost of wires so that I can get the actual cost of the wire.
    We are not using Material Ledger.
    Any suggestion
    regards

    Thanks Ajay,
    Even using ML we cannot get the actual price before the end of the period. And at the month end only we can valuate the inventory withe actual cost. I hope I am right till now.
    Pl correct if I am wrong.
    But in this case some wires rods are already out from the inventory for the sale that was valuated with the Std Price of the Billet.
    Hence these invenories will  not be available at the month end for the revaluation.
    Pl. correct If my thought is OK.
    ML can only be used where ther is lots of Raw Matl price variation..Hence I think I should go with the std price valuation itself.
    regards
    Kamlesh

  • Getting diffrent Actual cost from 0PM_OM_OPA_2 to 0pm_c01 and 0pm_c07

    Hi All,
    I am using BI report for plan and actual cost deviation of Work order(maintenance order) of PM(tcode iw33>cost tab>plan actual cost to check),
    question there is 2 query for this plan actual cost deviation, one on 0pm_c01(Maintenance Orders - Costs and Allocations) and second on 0PM_C07 Maintenance Orders: Scheduling, datasource is common 0PM_OM_OPA_2 for actual cost population in this cubes, BUT update rule are diffrent for both target,
    in 0pm_c07 its getting update by 0pm_ds04(dso) where we are getting only Actual cost with Debit(S) Entery(as debit(S) entery hardcoded at start routine in update rule from this datsource to 0pm_ds04), for report on 0pm_c07actual cost is matching with standard ecc report MCI8 - PMIS: Cost Analysis.
    in 0pm_c03 we are getting all Actual cost entry both Debit(S) and Credit(H), getting actual cost total as debit minus credit entry at cube 0pm_c03 and hence getting same on report on that, this report is same as like report on 0pm_c07.
    both report are calculating Actual vs Plan cost relation ship, but one report(on 0pm_c07) have only debit(S) entry while other report(on 0pm_c03) have both Debit and Credit entery, So getting diffrent  Actual cost at both report hence diffrent Actual VS plan Cost relationship from both report,
    Both are standard report given by SAP, Now which report we have to take it as correct one? which report is right?
    Regards,
    Dushyant.

    Hi,
    Sorry, In my pain post whereever i written 0pm_c03 is wong its 0pm_c01,
    as u said ur query on 0pm_c01 works fine? are u getting Debit(S) and credit(H) both entery for actual cost in this cube?
    as in 0pm_c07 we are gettin only debit(S) entery and this report matching with standard ecc reprot( as i mentioned in main post ) BUT for 0pm_c01 its have both S and H entery. if ur actual/plan cost report on 0pm_c01 have S and H entery for actual cost than with ECC report you are reconciling?
    Dushyant.

  • Actual cost are not updating in prodcutcost collectors ( KKF6N) - Variances

    Hi SAP's
    We are facing the problem with the Variance calculation for product cost collectors.
    The issue is When we are calulating the Variances for prodcut cost collectors the actual costs are not ( For few materials of BOM) updating.
    Because of these the variances are showing high.....If I settele this variances to COPA, my copa report is will be going wrong.....
    Please help me to comeout of this problem.
    Thanks in Advance
    PrasadReddyS
    FICO Consulatnt

    Hi Anand
    Please add the budget profile at Plant maintenance order level no need to add any substitution rule
    budget should also be control at order level
    Thanks
    trinath 

Maybe you are looking for