TD Shipm Cost Pricing - Conditions with Calc Type Q ( IS OIL formulas)

Hello,
Does anyone knows if this is supported. Seems like it can be included into Shipment Cost Pricing procedure but doesn't get saved in shipment cost document even though it does get correctly determined after repricing in VI02
Thanks in advance, zorik

Your template contains an IE Conditional Comment that is adding 30px of top padding to #sidebar1. This padding may required in older versions of IE but not IE9.

To fix it, change [if IE] to [if lt IE 9]
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

Similar Messages

T code/ report to list all material sales pricing condition with deletion i

I create sales org/ material level pricing conditions in VK11. Some unwanted material pricing conditions are with Deletion indicator active. Iu2019m looking for a report to list all material sales pricing condition with deletion indicator active.
Please advice me on this.

Hi Goto v/ld and select 16 which stands for individual prices, and then populate sales organization, distribution channel, customer ,material numbers,etc...and tick "Cond.marked for deletion" check box in "list screen" tab which is the most important, execute you will be able to see all material pricing condition even though it had been deleted.

Create pricing condition with default value in processing process field

hi all,
when i maintain the pricing conditions with vk11 or vk31, i want the price maintained is set default as blocked (the processing status field-KBSTAT). can it be done? i am using 4.6c.

You should try to use transaction variant
<i>Transaction variants simplify transaction flow by:
Inserting default values in fields
Changing the ready for input status of fields
Hiding various screen elements and menu functions, or even entire screens
Adjusting table control settings
When you create a transaction variant, you run through the transaction in a special mode. In this mode, you decide which elements you no longer need in your transaction and which values should be inserted where. If you choose to hide an entire screen, the system will no longer display that screen in the transaction and will proceed on to the next screen in the series. You can also adjust table control settings and determine the width of columns and the order in which you want them displayed. In tab strips, you can suppress tabs that you no longer need by setting them to invisible.
You may also create as many variants for a transaction as you desire. One of these variants can be defined as a standard variant. This variant is then valid across all clients. You may also assign different variants to specific users.
This is done using Variant Transactions. Variant transactions are then places in those users user menus instead of the standard transaction. </i>
To use this : Tools -> Accelerated SAP -> Personalization (transaction SHD0)
Regards

Maintaining pricing condition with field group

Hi
I want to check the linkage between condition maintenance table for pricing with the Contract.
Can any body tell me how to maintain the pricing condition with the field group of Contract.(provide me the detail path)
I am getting one error"Internal error in condition maintenance" when i click on product tab for any of contracts.
So I guess it may be due to any linkage failure between condition table and field group or tabstrip. please tell me how could I proceed forward to check this error.
Thanks

Hi, I hope that this linck to serve.
[condition fields table|condition fields table]
Cordial greetings.

User exit to copy Manual pricing conditions with in sales documents

Hi all,
I have a situation where i have to copy the manual pricing conditions from inquiry to quotation.
Problem: From VA21 when I try to do the same using the tab "create with reference" the document is being copied but the manually set pricing condition in the inquiry is not being copied into quotation. This is because in the copy controls the pricing type is set to 'B' which means "carry out new pricing". I can change it to 'C' or 'D' so that it copies manual pricing but i am not allowed to do so because other sales orgs in the company has a problem if i do so. Only our perticular sales org needs this config. I cannot even create another item catogory specific to this plant because it is against the rules of the company. So I am looking for a user exit in which i can change this pricing type during runtime so that i can plug in some code specific to this sales org to copy manual pricing. I have found one from the SAP note 24832 (MV61AFZA). It doesn't work as i think its obsolte. Can anyone suggest me a better way of solving this issue. Any quick response is appreciated.
Thanks,
Giridhar.

Hi
The following EXITS may help you
Exit Name              Description
SDTRM001            Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
V45A0002            Predefine sold-to party in sales document
V45A0003            Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
V45A0004            Copy packing proposal
V45E0001            Update the purchase order from the sales order
V45E0002            Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
V45L0001            SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
V45P0001            SD customer function for cross-company code sales
V45S0001            Update sales document from configuration
V45S0003            MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration
V45S0004            Effectivity type in sales order
V45W0001            SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
V46H0001            SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
V60F0001            SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
V45A0001            Determine alternative materials for product selection
Regards
PRabhu

Problem in data upload using pricing conditions with sales deal

hi...
i have to upload following fields -
Condition Type
Condition Table
Valid from
Valid to
Sales deal
Amount/Rate
Currency / %
Pricing Unit
Pricing UoM
Sales organization
Distribution channel
Sold to Party
Material Number
Material Pricing Grp
Batch number
Buying Group of Sold-to
Customer
Customer Group
CustomerHierarchy 01
CustomerHierarchy 02
CustomerHierarchy 03
CustomerHierarchy 04
CustomerHierarchy 05
Division
Sales Order Type
Sales Document Type
End user
Material Group
Tax Classification Material
Payer
Plant
Price Group
Price list type
Pricing reference material
Prod. Hier -1
Prod. Hier -2
Prod. Hier -3
Prod. Hier -4
Prod. Hier -5
Product hierarchy
Region of Dly Plant
Sales district
Sales group
Sales office
Sales unit
Ship-To
Shipping point
Buying Group of end user
Tax classification for customer
Type of Transaction
Scale Basis1
Scale Rate1
Scale Basis2
Scale Rate2
Scale Basis3
Scale Rate3
Scale Basis4
Scale Rate4
using XK15 t-code and SALES DEAL is the major concern.
1) First i used RV14 BTCI , that is a standard report for uploading the pricing conditions. But by using this all fields are updating except SALES DEAL becoz this is not present in the structures (like- BKOND-1, BKOND-2, BKOND-3 etc) that is used in RV14BTCI program. I searched other structures also but SALES DEAL is not present there.
2) Second i tried to find out some Function module that is containg SALES DEAL and i found two FMs - IDOC_INPUT_COND_A and BAPI_PRICES_CONDITIONS.....but
a) the FM - IDOC_INPUT_COND_A is used with ALE and where third party is involved, so we require control data and status data for this I dont have this. so we cant use it.
b) and the FM BAPI_PRICES_CONDITIONS is also not working for SALES DEAL....by using this it is also not uploaded becoz some mandatory information related to sales deal like- sales organisation, distribution channel are not present in this FM.
3) to upload this we can use the BDC recording method.....but the problem is - there are almost 15 condition types and based on these conditions almost 20 - 25 condition tables are there for every condition and based on the every table different screen sequence are there.....so if we go for BDC recording...than we have to make 325 recordings.....also not feasible solution.
so plz give the suggestions for this problem and check my efforts also may be i missed something that can be a solution.
Thanx in advance for all.......plz help.....

Hi Jitendra,
Goto RSA3 trans in the source system. Check if are able to extract the data.
If so then replicate the DS once in BW system. Activate all the DS, transfer rules etc & try to load it again.
Hope this will solve your problem!
Regards,
Pavan

Exit for changing Pricing Conditions with change in Ship to party

Hi All,
In transaction VA01/ VA02 the pricing conditions are getting calculated with respect to the Sold-to-party no.. Instead I wanted it to get calculated with respect to the Ship-to-party. Please guide me with an Exit that i can use, or any other way of solving this.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Roberto,
I am creating a sales order with transaction VA01 using a Sold-to-party say 1 and a Ship-to-party 2. While saving the order the tax calculations (if it is interstate - cst and intrastate - vat) are happening with respect to the Sold-to-party.
But I want it to happen with respect to the Ship-to-party. Is there anyway of changing this tax calculations in the pricing condition to take place with respect to my Ship-to-party.

Pricing condition record, calculation type F volume, scale basis E net weig

HI SAP Gurus,
I have a question on pricing condition records.
I have a requirement that needs to populate discount based on total net weight on the PO. For example, if total net weight is greater than 1000 LB, it should give 10 cents discount per GAL. The base UOM of the material is EA, GAL is an alternative UOM and Order Pricing Unit. I can make the pricing condition works if the discount is per LB. However, it doesn't work for discount given per GAL. The calculation type is F volume and sacle basis is E net weight. Pls advise what I need to do to make it work. Thank you so much!

closed

Create pricing condition with BAPI_PRICES_CONDITIONS

Hello,
I am trying to create a new pricing condition for a material using BAPI_PRICES_CONDITIONS, but unsucsessfuly.
Has anyone tried to do that?
Looks like BAPI is not generating a condition number.
Regards,
Eglese

Hi Eglese
Check these threads,
BAPI_PRICES_CONDITIONS
Problem with BAPI_PRICES_CONDITIONS
cheers
Sameer

Error in assigning pricing condition in condition generation

Hello,
As a part of configuration, I have to define one pricing condition in CRM with
Usage - PR
Calculation type - B - Fixed amount
which I defined in SPRO-CRM-BASIC FUNCTIONS-PRICING -DEFINE SETTINGS FOR PRICING- CREATE CONDITION TYPE
for trade promotion condition generation.
But while assignig this condition in condition generation type at
SPRO-CRM-trade promotion management- trade promotions- condition maintenance- define condition generation
I am getting an error as
Calculation type B of Condition type 9PP3 is not allowed for Pricing
Message no. CRM_MKTPL_COND_IF086
Request you all to help me in going ahead .
Thanking you in advance
Shailesh

HI Willie,
Thanks for the reply.
But the conditon which I defined is in CRM and not from R3.
As per the requirement, I need to define the pricing condition with calculation type fixed amount in CRM. I defined the condition.
But while assignig this condition in condition generation for trade promotion.
Thanks in advance.
Shailesh

Post proft segment and cost center in a sales order with value type 4 in CC

Hello,
We have CO-PA activated in SD. When we create the Sales order the field "Profit Segment" is automatically filled (with the characteristics values) and additionally we field manually the cost center.
The main problem is that when we post in the two CO objects the cost center becomes automatically with value type 11 "Statistical Actual".
In the end of the month we need to do the Assessments (KSU5) from the invoices created from one cost center to various cost centers but since the cost center in the invoice has "statistical actual" value type we can't do the assessments.
Is there any way to post in profit segment and in cost center and the cost center becomes with value type 4 "Actual"?
Thank You

Hello,
Thank You for you answer. I have one more question.
Is there any way to desactivate the field "Proft Segment" only for a specific document type?
I've already tried in transaction KE4W and system is not creating now the Profitability Analysis document but this field "Profit Segment" is still with values so the cost center is still with value type 11.
I've tried to delete manualy the values in the field Profitability Analysis but system gives me an error related with incomplete data in sales order. I've look in SD customizing and this field is not configured in the incomplete data messages
Best Regards

Implement pricing conditions GAU1 and GAU2

Dear All,
I want to implement pricing procedure for precious metals.
Anyone who has implemeneted the procedure at their end please guide me towards the same .
In PO I am getting following error in condition type GAU1 Inactive status as "X" and message as " Inactive via formulae of incorrect "
Please help
Thanks
Garima

Actually i haven't worked on metal prices...but once i had faced same type of error in my freight condition types...SAP responded with some solutions which i am posting...please see whether these are useful or not:
(1) Condition row is inactive
The condition type (group condition or item condition) is listed with or without a pricing result in the condition row on the condition screen for the subitem. However, the condition value is ignored. On the condition details screen (double-click on the condition row), an indicator is set for 'Inactive'.
(1.1) Inactive indicator 'A condition exclusion item'
You have selected an exclusion procedure at subitem level for your freight cost price determination schema. The condition type with inactive status 'A' was excluded using this procedure in favor of another condition type (set as inactive).
Check: In favor of which condition type or condition exclusion group was the condition type in question excluded?
=> Use Customizing transaction T_32 to determine the condition exclusion group to which the relevant condition type was assigned and use Customizing transaction TOK8 to determine the exclusion procedure assigned to the price determination schema.
(1.2) 'K - Inactive due to calculation basis/shipping material type'
An automatically determined or manually created condition type is set as inactive (inactive indicator 'K'), even though a valid condition record was found according to the analysis.
Check 1: Do all handling units in the subitems belong to a 'material group for packaging materials' that is assigned to this particular packaging material type in Customizing? The calculation base of the condition type refers to handling units (calculation bases C, E or F) and, in Customizing (transaction T_06), a packaging material type (synonym: shipping material type field T685A-VHART) was specified for the condition type?
=> Material numbers are assigned to 'material groups for packaging materials' in the material master (transaction MM02). 'Material groups for packaging materials' are assigned to packaging material types in Customizing: Transaction VHZU or IMG -> Logistics General -> Handling Unit Management -> Basics -> Define Allowed Packaging Materials
Check 2: Was a valid condition record for this condition type found in all subitems for the calculation base used?
=> Extend the condition pricing data (transaction TK11) so that valid condition records can be found for all subitems. If necessary, use a price 0.
Check 3: Was the condition type only created manually for individual subitems?
=> Usually, manual conditions must be created for the calculation base in all subitems, with the value 0 if necessary. If changes were also permitted at header level for an item condition (in Customizing transaction T_06), you can automatically create identical entries in all subitems of the calculation base by creating the condition at header level. You can then adjust these templates (with the value 0 if required) at subitem level.
Notes: For background information and options for 'Inactive K', see also note 318775. For the system response in the case of manual changes to freight conditions, see consulting note 773038.
(1.3) Inactive 'L - Condition exclusion header or inactive at header level'
The condition type could not be evaluated as a group condition or was excluded as part of a header exclusion because of another condition type.
Check 1: Could the condition group be evaluated at all?
=> On the condition screen of the header conditions (enter '=kkon' in the command field), check whether different subgroups have been created for the condition type. If this is the case, several condition rows will be displayed for the same condition type. Also check the Check the scale input values in the individual condition display (double-click on the condition row).
Since neither the price determination analysis nor the condition record display is available at header level, you must check the price table for the condition type using a subitem: Is there also a valid scale level for each scale input value? The lowest scale level is often missing in from-scales and the highest conceivable scale level is often missing in to-scales. For example, a to-scale of 'to 30 TO' cannot evaluate any shipments with 31 tons. You therefore need to extend this scale to 'to 99999 TO'.
Check 2: Did you select an exclusion procedure for your freight cost price determination schema at header level?
=> Use Customizing transaction TOK8 to check whether the indicator 'A - header exclusion' was entered in the relevant column for the exclusion procedure that is assigned to the price determination schema. If this is the case, the group condition inactive status 'L' may have been excluded in favor of another group condition type using this exclusion (set as inactive).
Use Customizing transaction T_32 to determine the condition exclusion group to which the condition type in question was assigned and use Customizing transaction TOK8 to determine the condition type or condition exclusion group in favor of which the group condition type in question could have been excluded.
Check 3: Are you using your own scale or condition formula for a multi-dimensional group condition?
=> You may try to analyze the import parameter KOMK or KOMP for a group condition in this formula. However, these parameters are not filled in group processing: '...The components komk and komp are initial during processing of group conditions...' ('i - Formulas' button on the 'Scales for Conditions' detailed screen in Customizing transaction T_06).
The inactive indicator KINAK is set by default to 'T' for group processing (inactive at header level) and is converted to the more general 'L' by the subsequent price determination.
(1.4) 'X - Inactive via formulae or incorrect'
If an error occurs during processing of multi-dimensional conditions (for example, during conversion to scale units or in a customer-specific formulas for scale bases), the condition is usually set to inactive status 'X'.
Check: Are all formulas used in connection with this condition (condition base formula, scale base formula, condition value formula) error-free?
(1.5) 'Y - Inactive because of subsequent price'
According to the price determination logic in SD, there can only ever be one valid price in a pricing procedure. All other conditions are surcharges or discounts in some shape or form. Accordingly, the last, valid pricing condition (valid condition record and not equal to zero) always applies. All pricing conditions in the schema with a lower level number are set to inactive status 'Y inactive because of subsequent price'.
Check: If the required pricing condition was unintentionally set to inactive status 'Y' by a subsequent pricing condition, you must decide (using an exclusion procedure, if required) which of the pricing conditions is varied. All pricing conditions with inactive indicator 'Y' are included in the exclusion procedure.
Regards,
Indranil

Question regarding usage of CRM pricing conditions using date ranges

Hi,
I wonder if someone has a suggestion regarding how to set up pricing conditions in CRM to accomplish the following scenario:
For existing customers we want to “freeze” the product price for certain customers,
but at the same time let other customers get another prize for the same product
and period.
(We have scenarios where the product price changes retroactively, years back in time, but only for those custoemrs that fulfill a specific criteria at the time where the prize change was decided to take place..)
We want the prize to be dependent on the customer status AND when this status was set
(before a specific date), but there doesn’t seem to be a way to set up pricing
conditions with date ranges (i e "customer status changed before YYYYMMDD
renders prize X").
Since we are talking about quite a lot of customers we do not want to add each and every
one of them as “individual price items” in the pricing conditions tables.
Does anyone have an idea regarding how to set this up?
Thanks
/Marika Wasserman

Hi Marika,
condition records have validity (FROM - TO). Let us assume you have a condition record for product A with 50 EUR per piece and this record is valid from 01.01.2014 until 31.12.2014.
If you create CRM Sales Order having product A at 4.12.2014 and this date is used as pricing date for the conditon determination, then it will find this condition record with price 50 EUR per piece. This 50 EUR should be the froen price.
Now how can you achieve that for the same CRM Sales Order another product price is determined for certain customer or a certain customer group?
The idea is to pass an additional pricing attribute, e.g. customer group. Then you can create a new condition table with this field with the key fields product and customer group. In the access seqeunce first the new condition table is checked and if no record is found, then the second conditon table is checked as shown below:
Access Sequence ABC
Access 10: condition table with key fields product + customer group
Access 20: condition table only key field product
Instead of customer group you define also any other field. You create your own implementation of the BAdI CRM_COND_COM_BADI that passes this field with a value to pricing.
Best regards,
Baris Yalcin

Create pricing condition using BAPI_CUSTOMERQUOTATION_CHANGE

Hi ,
I have a requirement to update quotation pricing data is condition exists i.e if pricing is already exists , if pricing is not exists it has to create a new pricing condition with the given information .
I am able to update the information using BAPI_CUSTOMERQUOTATION_CHANGE if pricing condition exists ,if pricing condition not existing its not working as expected.
Please guide me..
code i have written
*Conditions
      lt_conditions_in-itm_number = it_quot-posnr.
      lt_conditions_in-cond_type = c_zill.
      lt_conditions_in-cond_value = it_quot-kbetr.
      lt_conditions_inx-cond_count = 1.
      APPEND lt_conditions_in.
      lt_conditions_inx-itm_number = it_quot-posnr.
      lt_conditions_inx-cond_type = c_zill.
      lt_conditions_inx-updateflag = c_u.
      lt_conditions_inx-cond_value = c_x.
      APPEND lt_conditions_inx.
Thanks in advance,
Srinivas.

Hello Srinivas,
Use BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROMDATA in the create scenario. Before calling the BAPI check if the quotation exists. If yes, use BAPI_CUSTOMERQUOTATION_CHANGE.
Regards,
Ajith

How can I get SD pricing conditions list as in VA01 without creating SO?

Hi Guys,
I have searched a lot of posts for this answer but only found that it's not possible to do through function 'PRICING' without creating SO document.
My initial input is: sales organization, distribution channel, customer, material number, pricing date. Can I find relevant pricing conditions based on this info? I need to make a report, which would display all pricing conditions with values based on the selection parameters mentioned earlier. Thanks for any help.

Use function module 'PRICING'
This is a pretty big task interms of collecting all the required data.
Check where used list for pricing. This is used in 2 places. Put a break point on them and run your sales order transaction. See what are the fields passing through.
You can also determine from KOMK and KOMP . One for customer and the other for material. Make sure you pass all the data that is required.
You will get results of conditions in importing table. (may be konv)
Using simulate will actually creates a document number (i believe). Even though this will not be available in VBAK, VBAP... the number will be taken off from the sales order number range.
I have used PRICING function module in of my work.

TD Shipm Cost Pricing - Conditions with Calc Type Q ( IS OIL formulas)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for