Tds Validation

Hi,,
I have following doubts in TDS.
1)I want to create the validation rules for making business place/Section code as mandatory in f-43,fb60 & miro.For this how to define the logic.I hope i can do like this.
prerequisite:Transaction code=FB60,F-43,MIRO,Doc type=KR,KZ and G/L code=10001,10002(TDS G/L codes)
Check:Business Place =Blank
Messege=Business place is required for the entry.
2) I posted the invoice without giving the business place/Section code.So when i do J1INCHLN system wont recognise the TDS open item.
I went to J1INPP tcode and try to put them.But it says that the document is incomplete.I hope i have to give here the MIRO doc no instead giving the FI doc no.But i posted the invoice from FI only.How to reset B.place/S code in the invoice doc which is already posted.
Thanks,
Radhika.

hi radhika
per ; ( SYST-TCODE = 'FB60' OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB65' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'F-90' OR SYST-TCODE = 'F-47' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'F-48' OR SYST-TCODE = 'F-54' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'FBA6' OR SYST-TCODE = 'FBA7' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'FBCJ' OR SYST-TCODE = 'F-04' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'MIRO' OR SYST-TCODE = 'F-02' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'F-22' OR SYST-TCODE = 'F-27' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'F-21' OR SYST-TCODE = 'F-30' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'F-43' OR SYST-TCODE = 'F-41' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'F-42' OR SYST-TCODE = 'F-51' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'FB01' OR SYST-TCODE = 'F-05' OR
SYST-TCODE = 'FB41' OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB05'
OR BSEG-QSSKZ <> '' ) AND ( BSEG-KOART = 'K' AND
BSEG-AUGBL = '' ) AND BKPF-BLART <> 'LD'
check : BSEG-SECCO <> ''
msg : u r msg
can u trey like this i think u r problem is get in
reg/tbr

Similar Messages

Accounting Validation for blocking TDS posting with T-code

Dear Expert,
I have a requirement like below in OB28 Accounting Validation:-
I want to block Accounting posting with F-02 T code with Wht GL code Posting.
I have written:-
Prequisite:-
BKPF-BUKRS = '1020'
SYST-TCODE = 'F-02'
Check:-
BSEG-HKONT='403625' (which is a TDS liabilityGL code)
Message:- Error
But it is not working, The document with F-02 and GL code 403625 is getting posted
Please advise.
Regards,
Alok

A small correction in Validation rule.
Check:-
BSEG-HKONT<>'403625' (which is a TDS liabilityGL code)
BSEG-HKONT should not be equal to 403625
Correct that and try posting.

Restricting TDS based on validation rules for vendor invoice posting

I have two Tax Types assigned in the vendor master. If at the time of invoicing user do not delete the unwanted tax types, system posts both the amounts related to both the tax types.
User has to necessarily delete one tax type which is not required and then proceed with simulating the vendor invoice.
Can this be controlled thru validation rules ? Even if the user forgets to delete the unwanted tax type while passing vendor invoice, validation rule must throw an error asking to delete the unwanted tax types before simulating the vendor invoice.
Please help how to build such validation rule with detailed procedure.
Thanks
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
I hope you have selected both withholding tax type and code at the vendor master level itself.
It is generally advisable to select withholding tax type at vendor master level and leave the field withholding tax code to be in display mode. Hence during vendor master creation, they can only select withholding tax type and not the withholding tax code. Ensure liable to tax should be ticked against all withholding tax types.
During invoice entry creation either in FB60 or in MIRO, they can select the withholding tax code next to the withholding tax type and simulate and post.
In your case, you cannot delete the withholding tax types at invoice entry level. Ensure to delete the unwanted withholding tax type from your vendor master itself, I mean delete only the withholding tax codes pertaining to that unwanted withholding tax type.
Hope this helps. Assign points if useful
Regards,
Dwarak.

Validation for TDS Profit center = Busness place

Hi,
while posting EWT transaction end user should not select the wrong Business place . in our case we have maintained profit center = business place like this we have three PCA = Three business place
how to control this
regards
sekar
Edited by: Gnana sekar on Sep 8, 2008 11:46 AM

Hi,
Good afternoon and greetings,
Try creating a validation in GGB0 and check.
Please reward points if found useful
Thanking you,
With kindest regards
Ramesh Padmanabhan

Issue in FI validation

Dear All,
Every monthend im getting same proble from number of users while doing proces order and MB1A.
That time i will go to GS02 and in that i give some GL's in the set, then the transaction can process by the user and i have to remove those gl's after the transaction. The same i have to do in the every month end.
The error while doing MB1A is :Enter Business place, section code 31000766 Check TDS Codes.
3100766 is Oder.
I found the same message which is there in FI validations ( OB28 ).
But in the validation ther is no order or gl in prerequisite and check.
Prerequisite : Company Code = 'NEL' AND Posting date < '01.04.2003' AND
Account type = 'K' AND
Vendor > '0000099999' AND Transaction code <> 'FBCJ'
Check : Business place <> ''
Message : Enter Business Place, Section Code & Check TDS Codes.
Please help me out in this issue.
Best Regards,
Venkat.

Look if there is a validation with the same message
Sometimes when you transport a variant in still use some code from an old validation.
You can regenarate a validation/substitution with RGUGBR00.
That with the set of G/L accounts is not realy normal. In the most cases when a tranports went wrong you get dumps

J1INQEFILE AFTER VALIDATING DATA SHOWING ERROR

Dear All
For J1INQEFILE validation we need to maintain Master data as per the details given in the
note no.1389028 as follows:
====================================================================================================
Master Data:
The master data for deductory category, ministry name, state name and sections can be downloaded
from the nsdl website.
1) Go to the website http://www.tin-nsdl.com/Downloadsquarreturns_regular.asp.
2) Refer the annexures of the file format excels under section 'The data structure'.
====================================================================================================
From "The data structure" File Format for Form 26Q in excel file.
1) TDS Statement for Non Salary category (File Header Record) has 17 rows.
2) TDS Statement for Non Salary category (Batch Header Record) has 62 rows.
3) TDS Statement for Non Salary category (Challan / Transfer Voucher Detail Record) has 39 rows.
4) TDS Statement for Non Salary category (Deductee Detail Record) has 33 rows.
There are total Five Annextures given at the bottom.
Annexure - 1 Statename and State Code - If the table is ready available for the same, what is the name
and if the new one needs to create what name would be given for the same and it has relation with the
row number 54 which is suggesting creation of a new field where it needs to be created.
Annexure - 2 Section name and Section Code - Already maintained.
Annexure - 3 Ministry name and Ministry Code - Maintain through J_1IMINSTRY_CD mention in 1389028.
Annexure - 4 Category and value for category - Maintain through J_1IDDCTR_CD mention in 1389028.
Annexure - 5 State Name and State Code - If the table is ready available for the same, what is the name
and if the new one needs to create what name would be given for the same.
I am facing the problem of following errors :
T-FV-2032       Valid Assessment Year must be provided
T-FV-2034        Invalid Assessment Year/ Financial Year
T-FV-2171        PAO Code not provided. Mandatory to be provide PAO code.
T-FV-2174       DDO Code not provided. Mandatory to be provide DDO code.
T-FV-2177       Ministry Name should be provided for the deductor category selected.
FVU Version : 2.128    Input File Name : raj.txt
Thanks in advance.
With best regards
Viral g
Edited by: viral guruji on Mar 3, 2010 2:37 PM

Hi Viral,
please have a look at SAP note 1169222 and check whether this solves or reduces your problem.
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel
SAP AG

TDS Business place & Secotion code issue

hai,
In FB60 we are making entry with TDS. Here business place and section code is required to fillup. If it is not maintained at the time of posting, then there will be a problem in Remittance challan creation. If we call the document which was not maintained business place & section code, it will display but not able to make the payment for this document. In this case how can make the payment for this document.
govind.

Hi,
If you don't want to post tds for all transactions when u r using fb60,f-43 or f-48 then you can remove the tax type and tax codes at the time of pop up appeared for with holding tax, then system won't deduct any tds.
Otherwise, if u r using validation, u can change the message type from error to warning. Then system will allow u to post the data with business place or section code.
It's not possible to anybody to cover all scenarios, if the users following all the steps properly there was no need to go for options like required entry or validation.
To overcome this kind of problem, they should adjust something. Otherwise this kind of problem will continue in future also.
all the best
Prasad

Validation rule for Payment tax code

Hi
I have a requirement in which we have assigned both the invoice and payment with holding tax codes. However, at the time of booking vendor invoice through MIRO/F-43/FB60 , the user has to remove the payment with holding tax code manually. We have written a validation rule in which the prerequisite is that if the t code is F-43/MIRO/FB60 system should check if there is a invoice tax code. If the prerequisite is met and check failed system should give error message. However, our issue is that even after the payment tax code is removed, system is not allowing to save the invoice. The second issue is that the system is also giving an error if there is no tds tax types assigned to the vendor
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Hi
I have set a validation rule with a warning message. System checks for with holding tax code and gives a warning message to the user to remove the payment tax code
regards
Sanil Bhandari

TDS Amount in Local currency and document currency

Dear All,
When we deduct TDS amount on Vendor Transactions in foreign currency, the TDS amount is dispalyed only in document curreny(Foreign currency) in T.Code "FBL1N".
Now We want to see the TDS amount in local currency in T.Code "FBL1N". layout when we post TDS transactions in foreign currency(USD). B,caz there is no such fields "Withholding tax amount in local currency" in the change layout.
So, Plz advise me whether it is possible or not ? If Yes, explain me.
If you have any query, plz do let me know.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Kumar.D

Hi Prasad,
In Logistics Invoice Verification, when you enter an invoice in foreign
currency, the system automatically translates the foreign currency
amounts to local currency. The system calculates the exchange rate using
the following rule:
1.If the buyer entered a fixed exchange rate in the purchase order, the
system uses this rate to translate the amounts to local currency.
2.If an exchange rate was entered in Invoice Verification, the system
uses this rate to translate the amounts to local currency.
3.If an exchange rate was entered neither in the purchase order nor in
Invoice Verification, the system uses the exchange rate pre-defined in
Customizing for Financial Accounting valid for the posting date.
Exchange Rate Differences
If a purchase order is entered in foreign currency,the amounts are
translated from foreign currency into local currency at goods receipt.
If you enter the invoice for the purchase order in the foreign currency,
this can lead to currency translation differences between the goods
receipt and the invoice receipt.
How these differences are posted depends on how your system is
configured in Customizing for Invoice Verification
Exchange Rate Rounding Differences
When an invoice is posted in a foreign currency, the amounts are translated into local currency.Since the system rounds off the amounts in each posting line, this can lead to rounding differences due to the currency translation.
These differences are posted to an expense or income account.
Addition in transaction OB22 for the second local currency, it should be defined 'Translation taking transaction currency as a basis' is defined.
Pls. also refer to note:335608 Trnsln of 2nd and 3rd lcl crcy fm 1st lcl/trns crcy.
I hope the above information helps you out......
Best Regards,
Gladys Xing

TDS return excluding WCT line items

Hi Experts,
According to my understanding TDS return in sap are taken by selecting section codes in J1INQEFILE. By using a validation it is required in my system to fill business place\section code in vendor invoice hence section code is updated in TDS wHT codes and WCT codes line items.
Please help me to understand that what setting i have to do so that section codes should not updated in WCT WHT line items so that WCT line items can be excluded in TDS return.
This is the case where TDS and WCT both are applicable in same invoice and WCT is also treated by WHT codes and WHT keys.
Please help..
Regards,
Kuldeep Dubey

Hello,
Generally I suggest clients not to do the payment of open WCT items through J1INCHLN, hence it is not picked in the quarterly returns.
The payment can be done through a G/L payment transaction like f-07.
Regards,
Sam

TDS in MIRO transaction

Hi,
I have prepared MIRO with TDS. So entry has generated like:
Expense Dr.   1000
TDS       Cr.          10
Vendor   Cr.         990
After that I have deposited the TDS entry by creating challan and ultimately this has become clearing entry.
After this due to some errors, I have reversed MIRO transaction. There I found TDS entry has also got reversed without asking for resetting the TDS entry.
Now my client needs the system to be highlighted for resetting the TDS entry before reversing MIRO transaction. Please tell me configuration steps.
Babjee

Hello,
I am not expert in Patches but we have tried a validation of the error message for vendor invoice in our old company and it worked well for both MIRO and FB60.
Please work on this and it will be realy helpful for you
Best Regards

TDS at lower rates for certian limit

Hi experts,
Income Tax Department gives vendors certifcate for lower deduction of
tax u/s 197, which is a permission to a payer to deduct NIL Tax or tax
at a lower rate. This permission is generally given for a Financical
Year. However, recently it is seen that these certificates are for a
certain Limit. eg: a vendor is given a certificate u/s 197 upto a limit
of Rs.10,00,000/- for NIL deduction. This means that as soon as the
payment to this vendor crosses Rs.10,00,000/- TDS is to be deducted at
the normal rates. THIS NEEDS TO BE CONFIGURED IN THE SYSTEM so that the
correct TDS is deducted and paid.
Regards
venkat reddy

Dear Friend
In current Sap scenario it is not possible to have value cap on the withholding tax.
What we are doing is manually keeping tab on the value cap every month and The user is updated with the available limits. Once the cap is reached, the exemption validity date is changed from 31.03.2008 to the date on which the last invoice was posted. Any subsequent invoice attracts WT at full rate.
Somewhat cumbersome particularly in year end when most of the limits are reached but cannot help it.
We had suggested some customisation wherein the exemption percentage would be checked with the accumulated tax base amount but the same was rejected based on cost benefit ratio.
Would appreciate if you could think of something new and share the same.
Regards
Mukesh

Payload validation Error - Outbound flow

Hi,
I am trying to create an outbound flow to send a X12,4010,810 document to a trading partner.
Got the error - Payload Validation error.
Payload is as below
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?><Transaction-810 xmlns="http://www.edifecs.com/xdata/200" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" XDataVersion="2.0" Standard="X12" Version="V4010" CreatedDate="2007-04-10T17:16:24" CreatedBy="ECXEngine_837" GUID="{12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012}"><Internal-Properties><Data-Structure Name="Interchange"><Lookup Name="InterchangeControlVersion">00401</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeReceiverID">MarketInc</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeReceiverQual">ZZ</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeSenderID">OracleServices</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeSenderQual">ZZ</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeUsageIndicator">I</Lookup><Lookup Name="Standard">X12</Lookup><Property Name="ElementDelimiter">0x7e</Property><Property Name="InterchangeAckRequested">0</Property><Property Name="InterchangeAuthorizationInfo">Authorizat</Property><Property Name="InterchangeAuthorizationInfoQual">00</Property><Property Name="InterchangeChildCount">1</Property><Property Name="InterchangeComponentElementSep">0x5c</Property><Property Name="InterchangeControlNumber">000000001</Property><Property Name="InterchangeControlStandard_RepeatingSeparator">U</Property><Property Name="InterchangeControlVersion">00401</Property><Property Name="InterchangeDate">140313</Property><Property Name="InterchangeReceiverID">MarketInc</Property><Property Name="InterchangeReceiverQual">ZZ</Property><Property Name="InterchangeSecurityInfo">Security I</Property><Property Name="InterchangeSecurityInfoQual">00</Property><Property Name="InterchangeSenderID">OracleServices</Property><Property Name="InterchangeSenderQual">ZZ</Property><Property Name="InterchangeTime">1727</Property><Property Name="InterchangeTrailerControlNumber">000000001</Property><Property Name="InterchangeUsageIndicator">I</Property><Property Name="SegmentDelimiter">0x0d0x0a</Property><Property Name="Standard">X12</Property><Property Name="SubelementDelimiter">0x5c</Property></Data-Structure></Internal-Properties><Segment-ST><Element-143>IN</Element-143><Element-329>0001</Element-329></Segment-ST><Segment-BIG><Element-373>20140313</Element-373><Element-76>I</Element-76></Segment-BIG><Segment-TDS><Element-610>2</Element-610></Segment-TDS><Segment-SE><Element-96>4</Element-96><Element-329>0001</Element-329></Segment-SE></Transaction-810>
Can someone suggest what is the problem with this payload.

More detail --
Below is the message that is displayed in Oracle B2B Reports -> Business Message
Id
7F000001144BE0AB3A100000231A6860
Message Id
11d1def534ea1be0:-7e1384fb:144bd539c55:-8000-0000000000007dfc
Refer To Message
Refer To Message
Sender Type
Name
Sender Value
OracleServices
Receiver Type
Name
Receiver Value
MarketInc
Sender
OracleServices
Receiver
MarketInc
Agreement Id
OS_MI_X12_4010_810_OutboundInvoiceAgr
Agreement
OS_MI_X12_4010_810_OutboundInvoiceAgr
Document Type
IN
Document Protocol
EDI_X12
Document Version
4010
Message Type
REQ
Direction
OUTBOUND
State
MSG_ERROR
Acknowledgement Mode
NONE
Response Mode
NONE
Send Time Stamp
Mar 13, 2014 7:42 PM
Receive Time Stamp
Mar 13, 2014 7:42 PM
Document Retry Interval(Channel)
0
Document Remaining Retry(Channel)
0
Document Retry Interval(Agreement)
0
Document Remaining Retry(Agreement)
0
Native Message Size
Translated Message Size
2344
Business Action Name
Business Transaction Name
Xpath Name1
XPathName1
Xpath Value1
Xpath Expression1
Xpath Name2
XPathName2
Xpath Value2
Xpath Expression2
Xpath Name3
XPathName3
Xpath Value3
Xpath Expression3
Correlation From XPath Name
CorrelationFromXPathName
Correlation From XPath Value
Correlation From XPath Expression
Correlation To XPath Name
CorrelationToXPathName
Correlation To XPath Value
Correlation To XPath Expression
Wire Message
Wire Message
Application Message
Application Message
Payload Storage
Payload Storage
Attachment
Attachment
Label
soa_b2b_ - Thu Mar 17 08:30:33 CDT 2014 - 8
Collaboration Id
7F000001144BE0AB37E00000231A6850
Collaboration Name
Collaboration Version
Business Action Name
Exchange Protocol Name
Generic File
Exchange Protocol Version
1.0
Interchange Control Number
Group Control Number
Transaction Set Control Number
Error Code
B2B-51507
Error Description
Machine Info: (XXXX) Description: Payload validation error.
Error Level
ERROR_LEVEL_COLLABORATION
Error Severity
ERROR
Error Text
Error Brief : XEngine error.
Application Message :
Id7F000001144BE0AB22400000231A6820Sender Id TypeSender ValueOracleServicesReceiver Id TypeReceiver ValueMarketIncDocument TypeINDocument Definition810_DefDocument Protocol NameEDI_X12Document Protocol Version4010Refer To Application Message IdRefer To Application Message IdApp Conversation IdApp Message property{fabric.enterpriseId=-1, b2b.documentProtocolVersion=4010, b2b.documentDefinitionName=810_Def, b2b.messageId=11d1def534ea1be0:-7e1384fb:144bd539c55:-8000-0000000000007dfc, MESH_METRICS=null, b2b.messageType=1, tracking.parentReferenceId=mediator:954F1AF0AB1111E3BF8A5F99BC4D6B4E:954F6910AB1111E3BF8A5F99BC4D6B4E:oneway, tracking.compositeInstanceId=20012, tracking.ecid=11d1def534ea1be0:-7e1384fb:144bd539c55:-8000-0000000000007dfc, b2b.toTradingPartnerId=MarketInc, b2b.fromTradingPartnerId=OracleServices, tracking.compositeInstanceCreatedTime=Thu Mar 13 19:42:55 CDT 2014, tracking.conversationId=snbwNIP3idSWrxOB_9mfQZizjgj_IKJyb-EozcpIyP4., tracking.parentComponentInstanceId=mediator:954F1AF0AB1111E3BF8A5F99BC4D6B4E, b2b.documentTypeName=IN}DirectionOUTBOUNDStateMSG_COMPLETEError CodeError TextError DescriptionCreatedMar 13, 2014 7:42 PMModifiedMar 13, 2014 7:42 PMMessage Size2344PayloadPayloadBusiness MessageBusiness MessageRetry Interval0Reattempt CountRemaining Retry0ECID11d1def534ea1be0:-7e1384fb:144bd539c55:-8000-0000000000007dfcComposite Instance Id20012Parent Composite Instance Idmediator:954F1AF0AB1111E3BF8A5F99BC4D6B4EConversation IdsnbwNIP3idSWrxOB_9mfQZizjgj_IKJyb-EozcpIyP4.Domain NamedefaultComposite NameOSToMIOutboundInvoiceProjectComposite Version1.0Reference NameB2BOSToMarketIncOutboundUrl
Payload Storage :
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?><Transaction-810 xmlns="http://www.edifecs.com/xdata/200" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" XDataVersion="2.0" Standard="X12" Version="V4010" CreatedDate="2007-04-10T17:16:24" CreatedBy="ECXEngine_837" GUID="{12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012}"><Internal-Properties><Data-Structure Name="Interchange"><Lookup Name="InterchangeControlVersion">00401</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeReceiverID">MarketInc</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeReceiverQual">ZZ</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeSenderID">OracleServices</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeSenderQual">ZZ</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeUsageIndicator">I</Lookup><Lookup Name="Standard">X12</Lookup><Property Name="ElementDelimiter">0x7e</Property><Property Name="InterchangeAckRequested">0</Property><Property Name="InterchangeAuthorizationInfo">Authorizat</Property><Property Name="InterchangeAuthorizationInfoQual">00</Property><Property Name="InterchangeChildCount">1</Property><Property Name="InterchangeComponentElementSep">0x5c</Property><Property Name="InterchangeControlNumber">000000001</Property><Property Name="InterchangeControlStandard_RepeatingSeparator">U</Property><Property Name="InterchangeControlVersion">00401</Property><Property Name="InterchangeDate">140313</Property><Property Name="InterchangeReceiverID">MarketInc</Property><Property Name="InterchangeReceiverQual">ZZ</Property><Property Name="InterchangeSecurityInfo">Security I</Property><Property Name="InterchangeSecurityInfoQual">00</Property><Property Name="InterchangeSenderID">OracleServices</Property><Property Name="InterchangeSenderQual">ZZ</Property><Property Name="InterchangeTime">1727</Property><Property Name="InterchangeTrailerControlNumber">000000001</Property><Property Name="InterchangeUsageIndicator">I</Property><Property Name="SegmentDelimiter">0x0d0x0a</Property><Property Name="Standard">X12</Property><Property Name="SubelementDelimiter">0x5c</Property></Data-Structure></Internal-Properties><Segment-ST><Element-143>IN</Element-143><Element-329>0001</Element-329></Segment-ST><Segment-BIG><Element-373>20140313</Element-373><Element-76>I</Element-76></Segment-BIG><Segment-TDS><Element-610>2</Element-610></Segment-TDS><Segment-SE><Element-96>4</Element-96><Element-329>0001</Element-329></Segment-SE></Transaction-810>
I have set the following b2b headers in SOA before sending it to B2B outbound
Constant: 4010_810_Def Property: b2b.documentDefinitionName
Constant: 4010 Property: b2b.documentProtocolVersion
Constant: OracleServices Property: b2b.fromTradingPartnerId
Constant: MarketInc Property: b2b.toTradingPartnerId
Constant: 1 Property: b2b.messageType
Constant: IN Property: b2b.documentTypeName ( I defined my docuemnt with name 'IN')
Property: tracking.ecid Property: b2b.messageId

QBSHB not appearing in BSIK - TDS amount not appearing in BSIK Table.

Hi Gurus,
If I enter vendor invoice through FB60, QBSHB field is appearing in all relevant tables including BSIK. But when I am using MIRO, QBSHB field in BSIK (and also in other tables) is not updating. But in accounting document I can see correct amount going to the right GL account. When I am using FB60 T code the document type used is KR. When I am using MIRO document type used is RE.
Please help me .
Regards
Santosh Hegde
Cell: +91 99893 12365
email : [email protected]

hello,
I think youuse Extended withholding tax. In extended withholding tax the table WITH_ITEM is the right place to look for TDS information. MIRO is a new transaction and directly updates the extended w/tax tables whereas the fi transactions update both the with_item as well as the older fields bseg-qbshb. The bseg fields for tds are valid only for classical w/tax and are not important in case of Extended withholding tax as they would not have the exact amount as extended w/tax can have more than 1 tax type per vendor line.
Hope this clarifies your doubts.
regards,
pranav.

Error at the time of validation for fuv file format

Hi,
As per government requirement in India TDS return must to filed in .fuv format. The details for 1st Quarter (From April to June 2009) had been down loaded from SAP using J1IQEFILE T code.
While at the time of validating SAP data in .fuv converter it gives error message as T-FV-2032 Valid Assessment Year must be provided
Please tell me the solution to rectify that error, as tomorrow 15/07/2009 is the last day to file E - TDS.
Regards,
Sany.

This does not seem to be an SAP issue. This may be more to do with the exe file that converts to fvu file. In case of any problem, please read the readme text that is associated with the exe file. You can reach the TIN support desk at the number they have provided.
Visually check if the fiscal year has been properly downloaded from SAP. Does "2032" in your error message indicate the fiscal year from the downloaded file?

Tds Validation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for