Terms not reducing headcount in W_WRKFC_BAL_A

Hi,
We're in the process of implementing OBIEE using OBIA - HR Analytics and PeopleSoft as the source system. We've been validating the incremental load process and have found that a lot of the terminations we enter are not causing reduction in the headcount metric on W_WRKFC_BAL_A table.
For instance, two employees had a term row inserted on 3/27, effective 3/25. During the Incremental load on 3/27 both terms were picked up and I can see the term row in W_WRKFC_EVT_MONTH_F for both emps, yet in W_WRKFC_BAL_A, the HR_ORG_WID for one of the employees shows a decrease of 1 and the W_Insert/Update_dt field set to 3/37. The other shows no decrease and the W_Insert/Update _Dts are set to 3/8.
Anyone have any idea why this would be happening?
Thanks,
Rich

Can you zip up a few of your GoPro images, upload them to dropbox.com and post a share link, here, so others can experiment with them, or do you mean this issue is global to all camera models?

Similar Messages

Cash Discount at header is not reducing line item price

Hi Experts,
While putting cash discount at header, it is not reducing price of the my total line item. I am having total line item price = 100 USD (10 USD * 10 Qty). I am entering 10 USD as cash discount at header. It is not reducing total line item price to 90. Also in my accounting document 10 USD (cash discount) is going to my tax account.
Please advise.
Regards,
Kamal

Hi,
The cash discount case will only be applicable in connection with terms of payment. You will have to define your customized discount condition type in M/06 and assign it to your PO pricing schema via M/08 transaction. Make sure it shall not be set as 'Statistics' condition type.
Cheers,
HT

Payment term not appearing in PO print out

Hello all,
We have one PO where Payment term is not appearing in PO print out. I have checked other POs of the same type where its appearing in print out. In PO header payment term is maintained. Does this flow from Vendor mastre?
Regards

Hi,
Is this payment term is new one !
Yes, payment term should flow from vendor master to PO.
Now as payment term not printed in PO print, just check with your PO output type & related FORM or PDF/SmartForm in it for application EF in NACE t.code. Also check SmartForm in t.code: SMARTFORMS . Or if FORM check in t.code:SE71 / SE73 the SapScript & see inclusion of all payment term in it with help of with ABAP consultant.
Regards,
Biju K

How to make "payment terms" not modifiable in sales order

Hello every 1,
please help, i want to know:
how to make "payment terms" not modifiable in a sales order , as we know it comes directly from CMR and client wants "PAYMENT TERMS" to be not modifiable.
Look forward for your response.
Thanks in Advance,
Deepak

You need to use SHD0 or userexit chnages, like always determine from customer master, if user changes, give message like not modifiable or ask abaper to make non modifable field

Planned ind.requirement is not reduced during processing of the goods issue

Hello to all,
I am facing a problem.
We are using make to stock production with strategy 10 (LSF).
On 1.12.2006 the ind.requirement (LSF) is entered for week 4.2007 (I see that from schedule line history) for the material A.
In the system at that time there were a sales order which needed that material A in exact quantity the LSF was. The GI of the delivery were on 13.01.2007.
The LSF still exist in the system and it can be seen in MD04.
Before running every MRP, a planning scenario is being created and run. From MS04 I can see that the LSF exists since then in all scenarios except from 3.
The schedule line history of the LSF has only its creation (1.12.2006).
Can you please explain to me the following:
1. why in the first place the LSF did not reduce after the GI of delivery?
2. the LSF does not exist in olny 3 scenarios. how it could disappear (delete) and appear (create) again without history displays that changes?
3. If I delete the LSF I think I will not have a problem. Correct?
Thank you in advance for your help.
IX

Hi Ismini,
For the first question, there could be several reasons, like for example, 13.1 is not week 4. So if the consumption parameters did not allow forward for at least around 7-10 days (to get to the date of the first day in week 4), then consumtion didn't take place. Another reason could be that you defined planning strategy 10 for the material AFTER the sales order was already created.
Point 2: I really don't know he details of these LTP scenarios that you mention.
Point 3: if it really is from 2007 I think that you can delete the PIR without fear.
Regards,
Mario

Table space not reduce after delete in oracle 11G

Hi Team,
I have a DB 11.1.0.7 on unix.
I have execute delete tables on tablespace, but this not reduce.
Thanks

935299 wrote:
What segment space management type is defined for the tablespace in question?
MANUAL
Then you should check out the documentation some more.
But even if you shrink the table segement what is that going to do for the data file size?
I don't undertand you.
ThanksYour thread is titled "Table space not reduce after delete in oracle 11G" which implies to me that you are interested in reducing the size of a tablespace (which really means reducing the size of the underlying datafile(s)).
So, if you shrink the size of the sys.aud$ table, will that cause the datafile(s) to become smaller? Will it accomplish your goal? What else, if anything, needs to happen?

Table space not reduce after delete in oracle 10g

Hi..
Based on my system, i have found that my oracle table space did not reduce after the deletion query. Why ?.. Could somebody help me. As your info, I am using oracle 10g.
Thank you,
Baharin

After Delete the table space will not be set free. high water mark will not be reset. to regain the space you need to recognize the objects from which you deleted the data. This can be done in many ways.
1) Move the objects.
Alter table temp move --> optionally tablespace clause can be used. After this you need to rebuild table indexes.
2) With 10g table can be shrinked or reorganize to free the space.
alter table mytable enable row movement;
alter table mytable shrink space;
3) Export/Import
export the objects and drop and recreate with import.

Vendor PMT terms Not Displaying in FB60

FI experts, I am entering a vendor invoice thru FB60, but payment terms are no longer displaying, I have verified vendor master data and payment terms is maintained properly. I don't have this same issue with customer invoices thru FB70.
Can someone assist as to what could have cause for vendor payment terms not to display on FB60 anymore. The problem is that this is causing for vendor invoices to be entered pay immediately and the payment terms in vendor master are not being taken into account.
The only new thing we have done was create a new payment terms with a discount, which works perfect when you enter the payment terms manually in FB60.
Thank You for your help.

Hello Frank,
For SAP standard posting key 31 is for incoming invoices and not payment.
I am not sure why it worked before to you but this is the standard purpose of this posting key and it will not affect negativately other areas. If you want you can do some tests with integrated process between areas, to be sure but you will be using the standard, so do not worry about it.
In help.sap.com you will find more information about posting keys but I am providing to you all the information about it. The change that I proposed to you is the right way that the posting key should be configured.
I hope I could clarify your issue and the problem is resolved
Best Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Payment terms not exist in contract

Dear SAP experts,
We are in SRM 7 and ECC 6 and using extended scenario. For payment terms we download payment terms from ECC by using program BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and entries created in table BBP_PAYTERM. When we create PO we can use this payment terms from ECC. However the odd thing happen when we create contract, we can see the paymet terms as possible selection, but if we select it we got error 'Payment term not exist in target system'. However if we create payment terms directly in SRM (using config payment conditions), then we can choose the payment term from SRM.
But this is not making any sense as why do we need to have duplicate payment terms one coming from ECC and the other coming from SRM. Do I miss something in here? (Note that in RFx response, vendor can NOT choose payment terms locally in SRM as they can ONLY see the one coming from ECC).
Best regards,
John

Hi John,
Please implement the following note & retest this issue:
1609905 Validation for local contracts contains errors
Kind Regards,
Edel.

Save as Reduced Size PDF and Save as Optimized PDF do not reduce the file size. What gives?

Save as Reduced Size PDF and Save as Optimized PDF do not reduce the file size. What gives? I used Acrobat 9 to do this for a long time. I recently received new laptop loaded with with Acrobat 10 and it does not work the same. I typically scan 8-10 pages of receipts, combine the files in Acrobat, and then optimize to reduce the size so I can upload with my expense report. Typically, my files were reduced to 200-400 KB. I have a 2 MB file that will not reduce at all.

Bernd, thank you for your attempt to help but the option dialog windows do not contain the same options. There are numerous other posts on this forum about this issue and there is no answer. Clearly, there is an issue. I have submitted this issue to our internal help desk.

Table size not reducing after delete

The table size in dba_segments is not reducing after we delete the data from the table. How can i regain the space after deleting the data from a table.
Regards,
Natesh

I think when you do DELETE it removes the data but
it's not releasing any used space and it's still
marked as used space. I think reorganizing would help
to compress and pack all block and relase any unused
space in blocks. Why do you think that? Deleting data will create space that can be reused by subsequent insert/ update operations. It is not going to release space back to the tablespace to make it available for inserts into other tables in the tablespace, but that's not generally an issue unless you are permanently decreasing the size of a table, which is pretty rare.
Would you also please explain about different about
LOB and LONG ? or point me to any link which explain
baout it.From the Oracle Concepts manual's section on the LONG data type
"Note:
Do not create tables with LONG columns. Use LOB columns (CLOB, NCLOB) instead. LONG columns are supported only for backward compatibility.
Oracle also recommends that you convert existing LONG columns to LOB columns. LOB columns are subject to far fewer restrictions than LONG columns. Further, LOB functionality is enhanced in every release, whereas LONG functionality has been static for several releases."
LONG was a very badly implemented solution to storing large amounts of data. LOBs are a much, much better designed solution-- you should always be using LOBs.
Justin

Percentage of used table space not reduce after deletion

Hi..
This is my query to delete data from database:-
delete from $tb_data where to_char(partition_dt,'MON') = '$mm';
The $tb_data and $mm is variable and the $tb_data will be read input table name (as example backup_nx160, backup_ngn and etc) and the $mm will be capture the input month.
My question is why the percentage of used table space is not reduce after delete query was executed. Could somebody help me..
Please help me..
Thank you,
Baharin

baharin wrote:
Hi..
Is it the deleted space will be reused by the system ?Yes.
.. How could i check the real free tablespace or real usage table space ?If you have gathered statistics on the schema recently, then sum (avg_row_len*num_rows) should give you the exact number of bytes that are being consumed - assuming all tables are in a single tablespace under consideration. You can subtract this value from sum (dba_data_files.bytes) figure for the tablespace, to know exact free space.

WM-PP Production supply quantity is not reduce after Confirmation and GRN

HI
Iam configured the WM-PP, Against production i did material staging, TR-TO Process and Grn . But the raw material stock is not
reduced from the Storage type 100. kindly suggest me where i missed the configuration...
with regards
dinesh

Hi experts,
Please provide your expert comments

WM-production order supply quantity is not reduced after confirmation,GRN

Dear Gurus
               i am configured the WM-PP , in the production order after material staging and TR-TO process , i did confirmed the
               production order and GRN. Raw material stock is not reduced from the storage type 100....
               kindly, suggest me where i missed the configuration.
BR
DEVA

Hi Ismini,
For the first question, there could be several reasons, like for example, 13.1 is not week 4. So if the consumption parameters did not allow forward for at least around 7-10 days (to get to the date of the first day in week 4), then consumtion didn't take place. Another reason could be that you defined planning strategy 10 for the material AFTER the sales order was already created.
Point 2: I really don't know he details of these LTP scenarios that you mention.
Point 3: if it really is from 2007 I think that you can delete the PIR without fear.
Regards,
Mario

Rebuild Database did not reduce the database size

I just completed a rebuild database. The rebuild completed much quicker than anticipated and in the end the did not reduce in size.
This is my first rebuild and since original installation I have deleted a number of masters. From my understanding thumbnails and previews are not deleted when the master is deleted. In order to delete the thumbnails and previews the db must be rebuilt. Is this correct?
The db is over 31.1gb. The rebuild took approx 10 minutes and when completed the db size was still 31.1gb. There was a message during the rebuild that read "Recovering projects". I was expecting to see stats showing previews and thumbnails being generated in the activity window but don't see it. Has the db been rebuilt?
Thanks for any assistance.

Rebuilding the database is for disaster-recovery, not file maintenance. I certainly wouldn't do it unless something was fundamentally broken and the application didn't run.
"rebuilding" the database seems to do the following:
(1) remove the database file completely (not even to the trash, it destroys the database utterly)
(2) run through the plist files and reconstruct a brand-new database from them all
I checked this (on an empty library) using hard-links from the commandline, and step (1) above scared me sufficiently that I'd only rebuild the database as an absolute last resort.
Now, 31GB seems a lot for a database that only took 10 minutes to rebuild - are you sure you're not telling us the size of the library (to find the database size, right-click on the library and select view-package-contents, then open the 'Aperture.aplib' folder and find the size of the 'Library.apdb' file. That's the file you're changing when you 'rebuild database'.)
If you're telling us the size of the entire aperture library instead, then that size will be completely dominated by the master RAW files you've imported. I'd guess your library will be less than 10MB.
My understanding is that previews are deleted (since they're stored as separate files alongside the master image, if you look in the folder hierarchy), but thumbnails aren't. The thumbnails are aggregated together into one-file-per-project (presumably for speed of access), and I'd guess the space is reclaimed for future use, but the file doesn't get any smaller. That's a classic trade-off for speed-of-access, and users like us are normally very keen on things being fast
-=C=-

Terms not reducing headcount in W_WRKFC_BAL_A

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for