Terms of payment field on 3rd party condition record

Hello,
Does anyone currently utilize the terms of payment field (Payment terms) on the 3rd party condition record? At this point, it is a field that can be populated and saved to the condition table (KONP) but it does not appear to influence the purchase order document.

We would like to utilize this field on the condition record to set the payment terms field on the purchase order when the purchase order finds and references the 3rd party condition record. I do not know that path, though, from table to table to find this data.

Similar Messages

Interface - Payment received from 3rd party

Good day,
Can you please assist? Is there a standard IDOC that I can use to post payments to IS-U. We will receive the payments in a flat file format from the 3rd party.

Hi,
If you go into IS-U report program RFKKZE00 (Payment Lot transfer, IS-U Transaction code FPB3), read the documentation on what file format is expected by the program. Here is an extract of the first few paragraphs of the documentation:
Payment Lot Transfer
Description
This report transfers payment data and creates one or more lots for payments, checks, payment orders, or credit card payments.
To do this, it executes the following steps:
1. Read the specified application server file and check the data contained therein
2. Create one or more lots as long as the data records are correct
3. Close and post the created lots as long as the relevant indicator is set
Data records that contain errors are saved separately, and can be transferred after they have been corrected.
Output
The report outputs the following information in a log:
The number of data records (payment items) containing errors, their numbers and their lines in the application server file
A list of the lots created and their status
You can select an extended log.
Requirements
The report transfers the payment data from the application server file. Note the following for this file:
All fields must have character format.
Every line can only contain one structure.
The report expects the following for each file (take note of the sequence):
One file header record (BFKKZGR00 structure) per file
One payment lot header (BFKKZK structure)
Any number of items (structure BFKKZP)
Several lines with additional selections (structure BFKKZS) and enhancements to the note to payee (structure BFKKZV) can follow each item.
You can include data for any number of lots in a file. However, you have to ensure that you always specify the lot header first and then the related line items.
If you transfer a check lot, the BFKKZK-XSCHS field must be filled with X.
If you transfer a payment order lot, the BFKKZK-XZAUS field must be filled with X.
If you transfer a credit card lot, the BFKKZK-XCRDS field must be filled with X.
You can generate a test file using report RFKKZEDG.
You can display or change transfer files using report RFKKZEDA.
I hope this helps.
Ivor Martin

IPayment with 3rd Party payment system

Hi All,
I have to configure iPayment with the third party payment system. the 3rd party talks with the Paymentech for credit card processing.
Here in this case,
1. 3rd party server is providing web services to talk with them
2. 3rd party server is working fine with the Paymentech
Issues
1. As per my understanding, I have to use Gateway model overhere. Correct me if I am worng?
2. Do I need to create any configuration servlet to talk with 3rd party server or is there any other way?
3. At which point I should call the web services provided by 3rd party?
4. How to create request as per the web service requirements and how to solve the response provided by web services?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
If your third party system talks with Payment Tech, Is it possible for you to confiure payment Tech directly with iPayment. As you know that oracle provides all the necessary confguration and servelt. Its pretty striagt forward and simple.
Find out whether you can use payment tech directly, that should solve most of your issues. If you need more information, let me know
Thanks,
RK
925 998 1494
Independent Techno Func Consultant

How to control authorization about terms of payment in customer document ?

Dear,
I need to control authorization about terms of payment in customer document. the terms of payment fields can only be maintance by some persons, others persons can not be maintance the terms of payment, although they have the FD01 or FD02 athourization.
how can we archieve this programme?

Hi,
Like T.Nishanth says, use tcode SU21 to create your own auth.object. Mantain it with tcode PFCG.
Only an additional point. Use the enhancement SAPMF02D. In the include zxf04u01 (EXIT_SAPMF02D_001), click on 'pattern' and in the pop-up dynpro, try the field authority-check and populate it with the auth.object created before.
After, check it with FD02, XD02 and so on.
I hope this helps you
Regards,
Eduardo

Authorization object for terms of payment in VA01

Dear Gurus,
we want that term of payment field on sale order should be in display mode for all user except authorised user, who has /have authority to change terms of payment.
Requirement
Authorization object (display, change) for terms of payment field at sale order creation and change level
whether object is available in stadard or ABAP solution, please advice
BR
sajida

Hi
Two suggestions:
1. In customizing, for credit managament, in tcode OVA8 you can lock the document in you change this field (see the helps for the flag 'critical fields')
2. Manage it with user-exits becuase if you run SU24 for tcode VA01, I cannot find any auth.object related with this field. See SAP Note 178328 - Problems due to incorrect user exits in SD for further information
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Terms of payment-CMR

Hi All,
Why terms of payment field is given company code tab & sales area data tab in CMR ?
Why do give terms of payment differently ?
Regards
Rakesh

Hi,
The terms of payment field has been provided in company code data & sales area data is because they can have different entries in both places. The reason for having at both the places is -- it is the business transaction {if it is created and assigned to the sales document types} which will decide from where terms of payment has to be picked up.
I haven't come across the situation wherein CMR has different terms of payment at both the places, so I can't comment much on that.
Hope this will help.
Hrishi

Terms of Payment Enhancement

Are any user exits or other methods of enhancement available for terms of payment? My customer has vendor terms of payment that cannot be configured using the standard configuration parameters. Examples of these are:
1) Anticipation: Assuming an annual discount percentage of 15% the discount is calculated as follows:
     Invoice Amount x (0.15/360) x Days Paid Early
2) Tiered Rates: Discount rates with 3 or more terms, for example:
     10%   15 days
     8%     25 days
     6%     35 days
     4%     45 days
     2%     55 days
     Net     60 days
The payment will be done using transaction F110. I have checked the user exits for transaction F110 and found 36 of them, but none that seem suitable. They are mostly used for payment medium enhancement.
Regards,
Paul

Hi,
The terms of payment field has been provided in company code data & sales area data is because they can have different entries in both places. The reason for having at both the places is -- it is the business transaction {if it is created and assigned to the sales document types} which will decide from where terms of payment has to be picked up.
I haven't come across the situation wherein CMR has different terms of payment at both the places, so I can't comment much on that.
Hope this will help.
Hrishi

Authorization Object - Sales orders Terms of Payment

Hi,
How can we add the terms of payment field in the authorization? Such that some users may change the terms of payment, while others can only display?

Hi,
Tcode SU53. It tells you the object that it needs. Add it in tcode PFCG.
Regards,
Eduardo

How to find table / field where condition records are saved?

Hi,
We want Sales Order Rate ( Condition type ZR00 calculated with backward pricing ), as a column in a Z report.
I am not able to find out the table / field where system saves condition records for this condition type. I can only see structure.
Please help to trace down the field where this data is stored.
Regards
Trupti

Hi Vishal,
KNUM is the internal number under which system saves the conditions that apply to a Sales Order.
So first to derive this KNUM from sales order we use Table VBAK
AFter this we use this KNUM and the condition type in table KONV to get the value for that perticular condition type.
Please check following.
SE16> VBAK> enter any sales order in field VBELN and note down number in field KNUM.
SE16 --> KONV --> enter this KNUM and the condition type --> you would receive condition record value for this condition type, for that sales order.
KNUMH is a similar field in the table A503( in our case), but we also wanted link of the sales order to this record.
Thanks for your help anyways!!
points provided.

Condition record -mandatory selection fields

HI,
i want to make selection fields as mandatory
ctype is proo
-key combination is sor/dc/div & material all these are key fields
i want to make sorg/dc/div as mandatory fields
& MAterial as optional selection fileds while mainatining condition record in vk11
Pl suggest

HI,
Thx for replyin
YEs PROO -is price
i've created table selected all fields -have selected Sorg/dc/div/Material as key fields
I created a condition record for this combination in VK11 saved
In VK12 i selected this key combination sor/dc/div/mat
i want to make sorg/dc/div as mandatory selection fileds & MAterial as optional selection fileds
Pl suggest

Condition records -SD

Hi friends,
How can i control the fields as a header field and item field during creation of condition record?
I want to make some fields as key field so that that will be displayed at header level and other fields at item level.
Thanks
Ivy

Dear ivy
Go to V/06, select the condition type and see the tab "Changes which can be made". There you can see two fields, viz.Header condit. and Item condition. If you select the box against Header condition, in billing, you can input the condition at header level only by clicking "Activate". Alternatively, if you choose the box for Item condition, maintain Access sequence and also the relevant tables in V/07.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Mass maintnence of shipment cost condition records ( VK32 - Configuration )

hi all ,
does any body knows what are the necessary configuration for mass maintenance/view
of condition records ( trans VK32 ) ?
( for instance if i want to search by condition record or SA )
is there any other pricing reports for shipment cost condition records ?
im trying to configure with transaction V/LA but i cant add the necessary fields ( SA , shipment route,
condition record ..) or the necessary condition tables .
regards ,
ASA MOKED

transaction v12l_a

Condition Record wildcard

Is it possible to create a condition record using a wildcard? I want to match only the first three characters of the field that is 13 characters long.

Hi Laurie,
It is possible with some customistion(development)
You have to create a new field in the field catalog.
You have to update the first 3characters of your source field into this field using the user exit USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP or USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMK in include RV60AFZZ in module pool SAPLV60A
Now you can create a condition table using this field and maintain the condition records for the condition type.
DUring transactions you can find that the values are updated for the condition type, based on the value of the first 3characters of the desired field.
If you talk to the ABAPer, they will do this without much of problem.
We have done this few times and it is working fine without any problem until now
You can reward if you think this helps you

RFC destination error in posting 3rd party payment in 4.7 FI system

Hi,
We are running in to a problem when we are processing a payment via transaction F110S in our R/3 4.7 system for Financials. We are integrating our Financial system with ECC6.0 for HCM. We receive 3rd party invoice from HCM successfully via ALE and post it in 4.7 system. When we try to process payment against this invoice, apparently 4.7 system is trying to communicate with ECC 6.0 system and issuing an error and the payment processing gets cancelled. It generates a clearing document with out a check.
The error says "An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system HD1CLNT014
    Message no. B1550
Diagnosis
    An RFC destination should be specified for the logical system
    HD1CLNT014. This could not be done in this case. HD1CLNT014 is not your
    local logical system and this system is not included in the relevant
    Customizing tables.
Procedure
    Check:
        -   RFC destination
           -Port definition
         -oubound partner profile of message type SYNCH for this logical system
We checked our configuration for all Logical system and RFC destination and everything seems fine.
Any help in this regard is appreciated.
Thanks
Kesav

Hi David,
Did you check below is set-up correctly.
- Use transaction SM59 to create an RFC destinations for the remote system.
- Use transaction BD54 to create the logical system.
- Use transaction BD97 to link the RFC destination created in SM59 with the logical system created in BD54.
Also, check entries in TBLSYSDEST is filled with correct system name HPQCLNT210. Generally this error occurs when system name is incorrect in TBLSYSDEST.
Thanks,
Ameet

Day Limit Field in the Terms Of payment

hi,
may i know how to use the day limit field in the terms of payment maintenance with some real live examples?

Hi Raja,
The concept of day limit is to divide the Terms of Payment (TOP) in to different intervals
I will give you an example of that
As you know you mantain TOP in the customer master data
Suppose for the same customer you want the baseline date will be different in different time interval of the month
1) Invoices which are raised in the first 15 days of the month you want to have the baseline date as 15th of the next month
2) Invoices which are generated in the last 15 days of the month for the same customer you want the baseline date should be the 30th of the next month
So in this way you can have different baseline dates for a customer for the same TOP
Regards
Pratiksha
Please assign pouints if helpful

Terms of payment field on 3rd party condition record

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for