Test the base address

I will test the base address for my VME.the base address is set by P2A2，P2C2，P2A3，P2C3. I should create 16 VME devices in MAX,should't I? and each device respond to one base address.

Hi cws6805,
Thank you for contacting National Instruments. Let me make sure I understand exactly what you are asking. The base address of your VME device is set using four parameters. I'm not sure what you mean by "P2A2, P2C2, P2A3, P2C3" but it sounds as if you are referring to pins A2, C2, A3, and C3 on the P2 connector. You need to test your device to find out what the base address is. You're not sure which address your instrument will use, so you want to add a VME device for each possible base address.
If this device is in a VXI chassis with a VXI controller, this method will not work. Those pins are used for -2V, Clock 10, Trigger Line, and ground. If this is the case, your VME instrument will not function properly in a VXI system.
I'll assume t
hat your VME instrument uses four other parameters to set the base address. If you add all 16 devices and then try to communicate with each device, then yes, you would be able to determine which device can communicate and therefore is the real device. You could then find out what the base address is for that device.
Regards,
David Shatila
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Similar Messages

The device PCI 6036E: Analog Input error:"the device is not responding to the base address",Output :No signal

I am using PCI 6036E DAQ card, DAQ 6.9.2. , I have not connected to any external device.
When I tested card(in Test Panel of MAX2.2,DAQ 6.9.2) an error appearing �the device is not responding to the base address� � then I pressed Yes, Then TestPanel window appearing�
In analog Input Tag, there is an error �-10805�. This error also appearing when I run the standard analog input samples (use Delphi 6.0).
I tested analog output functions in TestPanel, Delphi Examples, LabView 6.1. There are not error appearing but there is not output signal (using Oscilloscope to see).
Output, Input digital functions are working correctly.
Next I try to foll
ow all the instruntions as recommended:
-Changing TO another slots PCI
-Reinstall Os WinXP,98SE�
-Use another Computer�
But all of the cases are still not working.(the above error still appeared, no output signal)

Nvd,
I'm sorry to hear about the problems that you are running into with your DAQCard. I can understand your frustration with the errors that you are seeing. You mention that you have tried to do some troubleshooting, I was wondering if you have tried all the troubleshooting techniques listed in this KnowledgeBase:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/DCFCDB240788F8D486256D6A00834D80?OpenDocument
If you have tried all of those things, I would suggest one additional thing to try. I would suggest updating your NI-DAQ drivers to version 7.0. These drivers are the newest versions of our Data Acquisition Drivers, and can be downloaded from our website here:
http://digital.ni.com/softlib.nsf/webcategories/85256410006C055586256BBB002C128D?OpenDocument&
node=132060_US
If you have tried all of the above troubleshooting options, please post a detailed description of what you have tried. This may help to clarify what is going wrong.
Jed R.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

How do I locate the base addresses of the 2 PC-DIO-24pnp boards I've installed?

I've tried using CVI/LabWindows to ask for the base address, but it gives me an extremely long hex number. When I define it as my base address in my program, I can't toggle my output port.The code is pretty straight forward. I think I'm not using the proper address. I can toggle the ports when I use the DAQ software that came with the boards.

If you make a call to the Get_DAQ_Device_Info function querying for the ND_BASE_ADDRESS infoType, you should be able to derive the base address of a board by device number (specified in MAX). Further documentation and use of this function can be found in the NI-DAQ help file.

How to find the base address of a pci device in register programming?

Hello Everyone
I am making a register program to pci-7344.
At this link http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/3efedde4322fef19862567740067f3cc/15f094f65a17e3af8625660d0018a20a?O... I find a method that finds the correct address in the register programming a pci device,but I am confused with some details.
It says BAR0 is assigned to the miniMITE ASIC,while BAR1 is used to program the PCI device itself.So the address mapped from BAR0 is
supposed to be the base-address of the registers on the miniMITE,but why 0x300 is added to the base-address? What 0x300 means?
I wonder if the address mapped from the BAR1 is not the valid baseadress for the pci board and a initial offset should be added to
it.If so what is the initial offset?
Thank you!!

Thank you for your reply !!
I am developing pci-7344`s driver under venturecom`s rtx,now I have found the baseadresses[0] and baseadresses[1] . baseaddresses[0] is the base-address of the miniMITE and I can get the vendor ID, device ID by directly reading from baseaddresses[0] +offset,but baseaddresses[1] does not like to be the base address of the 7344 registers,because I can not get the correct status information when I read from the csr(baseaddresses[1]+0x04)(all the value read back is 1).According to your advice I add the following codes to the program.
window_data_value = ( (0xffffff00 & (ULONG)BAR1.LowPart) | (0x00000080) );
*((PLONG)(vMemAddr[0]+0xc0)) = window_data_value;
vMemAddr[0] is the virtual address that is mapped from BAR0 into the user`s program ,which gives us access to physical memory locations on the system.
After adding these codes I still can read the correct information from BAR0,but I still can not read back the correct value from BAR1(all the value read back is 0).
It says in ddk that the csr(a read-only register) is located at cardlogicaddress+4(8byte offset),so I wonder what the cardlogicaddress is . What is relationship between baseaddresses[1] and cardlogicaddress?
Thank you!!!!!

AT-MIO-16XE-50 device is not responding to the selected base address

I'm trying to install my AT-MIO-16XE-50 DAQ board onto my Windows NT desktop computer, but I'm having trouble.
Here's what I've done: I've installed LabView 5.1 and the NIDAQ 7.0 software onto my computer first. Then I've physically installed the DAQ board into my computer. After starting the computer, the plug-and-play system seems to recognize the new hardware and install drivers for it. It then says I need to reboot the computer, so I reboot the computer.
When I then look at my device manager, it lists AT-MIO-16XE-50 twice. Under the properties/resources tab, one of them lists "input/output range", "interrupt request", "direct memory access", and "direct memory access" (i.e., 2 "direct memory access"s). The second one only lists "direct memory access" once and nothing else under the properties/resources tab. Also, the first one says that it is working properly while the second one says that it is not working properly (Code 10). I've played around with chaging the "direct
memory access" numbers and after rebooting the computer have gotten both AT-MIO-16XE-50's in the device manager to say that they're working properly. So, now the DAQ board appears to be installed correctly, because the device manager reports no problems with it. However, there are still 2 of them. My first question is this: should there be only 1 entry in the device manager list, or are there supposed to be the 2 that I see? The entries do appear to be different from each other, but they're for the same device, so that's a little confusing.
When I open my Measurement and Automation explorer, only one AT-MIO-16XE-50 device is listed (so this looks good), and under "properties" all 3 "direct memory access" numbers are listed. So, this all seems good. But, when I click on "test resources" or "test panel", I get an error message saying that "the device is not responding to the selected base address". Considering that this device was plug-and-play, and I did not set the base address manually, I don't understand why I'm getting this error message.
What I've tried is to change the "input/output range" number by using the device manager. I've tried a few different settings (rebooting the computer after each change) and none of the different "input/output range" settings seem to work.
I'd appreciate it if you could give me any help on figuring out how to resolve this "not responding to base address" problem. The info on your web site
appears to suggest flipping dip-switches on the DAQ card, but my card does not have any dip switches because it is plug-and-play. So, right now I'm
clueless! Thanks for reading this, and I hope that you have more insight than I do.

Smaria,
The AT-MIO-16XE-50 shows up twice in the Device Manager because it reserves three DMA channels, and the ISA bus only allows two DMA channels per ISA slot. You mentioned that you were able to get both devices working properly in the Device Manager. Below is a link to a KnowledgeBase that describes the proper procedure to successfully accomplish this. You should verify that this is the procedure you followed:
Exclamation Mark Appears with Error Code 10 on Windows XP/2000/98 After Installing AT-MIO-16E-10
Spencer S.

Format of the parallel port base address

Just wondering if someone could please help with what I'm sure is a simple question
I'm currently trying the control the first 3 bits of the parallel port using the Out Port sub vi.
Using the Labview examples and help I can see how to find the base address of the port. My LPT1 port is 378 like most.
However the parallel port I'm trying to control is a added in extra PCI card and looking in the Device Manager this is LPT3 with 2 an address ranges starting at CF00 and CE00 . I understand how the address range of starting at 0378 becomes 378 for the base address. But whatabout CF00 asnd 2 ranges? What do I need to put as the base address for the Out Port for CF00?
thanks in advance
Nick

duplicate post. why did you feel the need to repeat the question, especially since it has already been answered.

WCF Published Orch - Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding MetadataExchangeHttpBinding

I have an orchestration published as a web service. It was working fine on our test environment, we deployed to production, and now getting this error. The website wouldn't go in the BizTalk MSI, so we copied the files. We reset the Authentication
to match the test system (we are using Basic Auth).
When we try to browse the webservice in the browser, it prompt for userid/password, we enter it, then it gives the following error.
I'm not even sure what it means by "base address", if URL was https://prod.mydomain.com/myapp/myservice.svc, would https://prod.mydomain.com be the based address? In the test environment, the URL is https://test.mydomain.com/myapp/myservice.svc.
In both environments, we have a customer calling this webservice.
Also, I don't know what it means "scheme http". We are using https:... on the URL.
I'm thinking this is either security related, something to do with the app pool being different, or maybe something to do with bindings.
Thanks,
Neal Walter
http://MyLifeIsMyMessage.net
Web.config:
    <services>
      
      <service name="Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.BizTalkServiceInstance" behaviorConfiguration="ServiceBehaviorConfiguration">
        <endpoint name="HttpMexEndpoint" address="mex" binding="mexHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="" contract="IMetadataExchange" />
        
      </service>
    </services>
</system.serviceModel>
    <system.webServer>
        <security>
            <authorization>
                <remove users="*" roles="" verbs="" />
                <add accessType="Allow" users="myCustomer" />
            </authorization>
        </security>
    </system.webServer>
Server Error in '/eSecuritelIn' Application.
Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding MetadataExchangeHttpBinding. Registered
base address schemes are [https].
Description:
An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the
code. Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding MetadataExchangeHttpBinding. Registered base address schemes are [https].
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using
the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[InvalidOperationException: Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding MetadataExchangeHttpBinding. Registered base address schemes
are [https].]
   System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostBase.MakeAbsoluteUri(Uri relativeOrAbsoluteUri, Binding binding, UriSchemeKeyedCollection baseAddresses) +16582113
   System.ServiceModel.Description.ConfigLoader.LoadServiceDescription(ServiceHostBase host, ServiceDescription description, ServiceElement serviceElement, Action`1
addBaseAddress) +1082
   System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostBase.ApplyConfiguration() +156
   System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostBase.InitializeDescription(UriSchemeKeyedCollection baseAddresses) +215
   System.ServiceModel.ServiceHost..ctor(Object singletonInstance, Uri[] baseAddresses) +400
   Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WebServiceHost`3..ctor(IsolatedReceiverType isolatedReceiver, BizTalkServiceInstance serviceInstance, Uri[] baseAddresses)
+36
   Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WebServiceHostFactory`3.CreateServiceHost(String constructorString, Uri[] baseAddresses) +533
   System.ServiceModel.HostingManager.CreateService(String normalizedVirtualPath) +1413
   System.ServiceModel.HostingManager.ActivateService(String normalizedVirtualPath) +50
   System.ServiceModel.HostingManager.EnsureServiceAvailable(String normalizedVirtualPath) +1172
[ServiceActivationException: The service '/eSecuritelIn/eSecuritelIn_OrchPublished_RepairEquipmentService.svc' cannot be activated due to an exception during compilation.
The exception message is: Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding MetadataExchangeHttpBinding. Registered base address schemes are [https]..]
   System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End(IAsyncResult result) +901424
   System.ServiceModel.Activation.HostedHttpRequestAsyncResult.End(IAsyncResult result) +178702
   System.Web.AsyncEventExecutionStep.OnAsyncEventCompletion(IAsyncResult ar) +107
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET
Version:4.0.30319.272

When you want to migrate Web Applications from one environment to other there are multiple ways to achieve it.
1) Migrate in MSI- Export MSI and select the option for your Web Application, however I don't recommend this option
2) Is to browse the folder for Web Application(Right click on web app and browse). Copy this folder(normally within inetpub folder) and take it to the inetpub folder of other environment. Later from the IISManager create application.
Are you not using the same Binding file?
Check you web.config file and see if the endpoint is configured for mexHTTpBinding.
Old: binding="mexHttpBinding"
New: binding="mexHttpsBinding"
web.config snippet:
<services>
<service behaviorConfiguration="ServiceBehavior" name="LIMS.UI.Web.WCFServices.Accessioning.QuickDataEntryService">
<endpoint behaviorConfiguration="AspNetAjaxBehavior" binding="webHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="webBinding"
contract="LIMS.UI.Web.WCFServices.Accessioning.QuickDataEntryService" />
<endpoint address="mex" binding="mexHttpsBinding" contract="IMetadataExchange" />
</service>
Also look into the below article- How to fix: "Could not find a base
address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding WebHttpBinding" Errors
Moving to https = Could not find a base address that matches scheme
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

The device is not responding to the selected base address

my DAQ card is PC-LPM-16, a few days ago, i configed it properly. and i didn't use it for a few days, but didn't plug out from my computer. today i want to use it, but the MAX test showed that "The device is not responding to the selected base address." i setup my hardware and software again, but still can't resole it, what can i do now?
thank you very much.
liyongqin
2001-10-23

"The error could be happening for a variety of reasons. The first thing I would do is to visit www.ni.com/support/daq and follow the installation procedure, which includes troubleshooting steps on the error you are receiving.
If that doesn't work then try to install the board in another computer with no other devices installed. This will test to make sure the board is not bad. If all else fails call National Instruments and have someone troubleshoot the board and return and repair it if necessary."

Device is not responding to the selected base address-DAQCard-AI-16E-4

Configuration: WinXP, Labview express 7 evaluation, & DAQCard-AI-16E-4
Driver installed : TDAQ741
Without the PCMCIA card in my laptop, I have installed my Labview and then the driver TDAQ741. When I opened the Measurement & Automation Explorer and tried the Test Panel, I'm getting "The device is not responding to the selected base address."
Can anyone tell me how do I fix this problem?

Hi yoyoman-
Common solutions to the "...not responding to the selected base address..." error are suggested in this KB. Please take a look and let us know if you still run into problems after trying these.
Thanks-
Tom W
National Instruments

How can I re-use the mail address I signed when I was testing MobileMe?

A few months ago, I tested mobile me and sigend on a me.com email address. I didn't take the anual subscription so the testaccount was closed fur using but is still existing. Now, I'd like to use the mail address for the cloud services, but I says, -already taken. When I try to log in with the old address it says: account expired.
What can I do to re-use the old address?
Thank you,
Oliver

Try http://me.com/move/

How to restrict folder access on the basis of an ip address

I would like to restrict folder or item access on the basis of an ip address or domain address, not only with access rights based on login server, to get the possibility of intranet end internet within the machine and the same instance of 9ias.

Currently, this option is not supported. Going forward, there will be an option for user hookups where you can add you own functions to augment the ACLs. The forthcoming 3.0.9.8.3 patch should include the function-based authorization.

How can I test for the bas unit enterd in a control?

How can I to create a polymorphic vi where the user can enter either volume or temperature.
how can Labwiev test for the base unit entered
pseudocode example:
input X
if X.base_unit == m^3 do .......
thanks for any suggestion to resolve or avoid my problem
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi schaerm,
you have to dig deeper.
An idea is this one:
The red marked word is containing the unit - in a coded way. Somewhere in the LV help you can find the description of this coding (I remember a chapter on memory representations of all LV datatypes...). (There surely is an easier or better way - but the example is done quic&dirty.)
You can also format the number into a string and analyze the unit here...
Message Edited by GerdW on 02-07-2010 07:21 PM
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

Why do I get an error message that the IP address of my new Airport Extreme base station is invalid?

I have tried several times to replace my Airport Express with Airport Extreme by following the instructions. These attempts were made with both options, Replace an Exiting Network and Create a New Network. I get to the Setup is Complete page and wait for the base station to restart. The amber light goes from solid to flashing but never turns green. After waiting several minutes I get the problem page stating that the IP address is invalid. I have powered off my computer and modem, reset the Airport Extreme and tried again witht he same result. I am now back on Airport Express to enable connection to the Internet.
Any suggestions?

There are three Airport resets, soft, hard and factory default. It would probably be beneficial if you tried each one in sequence. Actually, you could jump to the factory default reset if you don't mind reconfiguring from scratch.

How do I find the valid IP address for the base station?

I am trying to install he Airport Extreme but I am receiving this message: The wi-fi base station does not have a valid IP address. How do I find the valid IP address for the base station?

I have run an ethernet cable from the modem to my Mac and I do have internet connection. But when I connect that ethernet to the TC and run Airport Utility to set it up I get the error about no valid IP address.
This tells us that the modem has associated with your computer. The modem "remembers" the settings for your computer and "looks" for it when you connect the TC. It does not "see" the computer, so it does not associate with the TC.
The modem needs to be reset so that it will not remember the computer. Then it will associate with the next device that connects.
Look for a reset button on the modem, and if present, push it for a second or two. Then power off the modem and leave it off for at least 30 minutes. Power off everything else as well.
After the wait period, power up the modem and let it run for 4-5 minutes by itself. Then power up the TC and let it run a few minutes. Power up each other device one at a time about a minute apart.
Check to see if the modem is now associating with the TC so that the TC will get a valid IP address.

IB search on the basis of the account address

Hi all,
I'm working on SAP CRM 2007: I configured an Interaction Center Business Role, in particular on Service scenario.
The account identification process develops through this steps:
1) I identify an account;
2) I confirm the contact person;
3) I select one of the IBs accociated to the account I've just recognized
If I would like to disply, after having identified the account and confirmed the contact person, all the IBs installed upon the account address, what I have to do? I mean, can I change the "rule" according to wich it is possible to choose an IB only among the ones are associated to account "name" with a new one that permits to display all the IBs installed in the same street of the customer (always after having identified the account)?
Thanks & regards
Stefano

Hello Stefano,
In transaction CRMC_IC_BPPROFX, in the Object Components folder, you can determine whether the automatic search for IObject/IBase components is done based on the account, the contact person, or both. Does this help?
Regards,
John

Test the base address

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for