Text code interpreted as scientific notation

I have an http service returning xml to populate a data grid.
The grid columns are tied to element attributes. One of these
columns is a simple text code, like a product code. When this
product code "looks like" scientific notation (e.g. "3E5"), the
grid is displaying "300000" instead of the code. Is there a way
somehow to tell the grid that this is a text field, and not a
number? How do you turn this off? I am rendering the column with a
label, but it doesn't make any difference. Thanks for any
tips.

Is from trying to jam an int into float?That's exactly the cause. Here are some solutions:
- Use java.text.DecimalFormat to format the output or cast the float to an integer type when you want to print it (presicion might become a problem).
- Keep the number in an int or long all the time. This way you'll not lose any presicion.
Explanation can be found in the API docs of Float.toString():"If the argument is NaN, the result is the string "NaN".
Otherwise, the result is a string that represents the sign and magnitude (absolute value) of the argument. If the sign is negative, the first character of the result is '-' ('-'); if the sign is positive, no sign character appears in the result. As for the magnitude m:
If m is less than 10^-3 or not less than 10^7, then it is represented in so-called "computerized scientific notation." Let n be the unique integer such that 10n<=m<1; then let a be the mathematically exact quotient of m and 10n so that 1<a<10. The magnitude is then represented as the integer part of a, as a single decimal digit, followed by '.' (.), followed by decimal digits representing the fractional part of a, followed by the letter 'E' (E), followed by a representation of n as a decimal integer, as produced by the method Integer.toString(int) of one argument."

Similar Messages

  • Powershell / Scientific Notation Woes / Formatting Output to Live Excel Sheet

    I have a WMI query in a script that dumps machine information to a live excel sheet.
    I find when I query the model # of the machine using (this line of code from the script):
    $Sheet.Cells.Item($count,4) = (Get-WmiObject win32_computersystem -ComputerName $computer).Model
    The output almost always changes into Scientific Notation, because this is a typical model number :   "3500-E52"
    Is there a way to modify the formatting of the:
    $Sheet.Cells.Item($count,4)
    so that Excel uses "text" formatting for that cell?  I know you can change the fonts etc... but have not been lucky in finding a powershell > excel reference
    that explains how to change a cell or column's formatting beyond the basics.
    I have seen recommendations to others to dump the results queries to a CSV first, and then import into Excel (which would allow a manual change of that column's format).  I'm just
    hoping to bypass the extra "hands on" and format more directly to a sheet in Excel.
    If .csv is the best way to go, I'll muddle through it and change the code.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Ben

    $sheet.Cells(1,1).NumberFormat
    = "@"
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • Long number in CSV file appearing in scientific notation by default

    Hi,
    How can I stop a long number in a CSV file that is opened in excel from appearing in scientific notation by default?
    eg.
    "hello","778002405501 ", "yes"
    becomes:
    hello | 7.78002E+11 | yes
    I have tried wrapping the data in quotes in the csv but to no avail.
    Thanks in advance,
    Alistair

    You can change the extension from ".csv" to ".xls" and use table to form the data and use
    style=”mso-number-format:\@;”
    Please read the sample code below in Classic ASP:
    You can also read in my blog http://sarbashish.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/export-to-excel-how-to-prevent-long-numbers-from-scientific-notation/
    <%
    Response.Clear
    Response.CacheControl = “no-cache”
    Response.AddHeader “Pragma”, “no-cache”
    Response.Expires = -1
    Response.ContentType = “application/vnd.ms-excel”
    Dim FileName
    FileName = “TestDB Lookup-” & month(now)&”-”&day(now)&”-”&year(now)&”.xls”
    Response.AddHeader “Content-Disposition”, “inline;filename=” & FileName
    %>
    <html xmlns:o=”urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office” xmlns:x=”urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel” xmlns=”http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40″;>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=”text/html; charset=UTF-8″>
    <!–[if gte mso 9]>
    <xml>
    <x:ExcelWorkbook>
    <x:ExcelWorksheet>
    <x:WorksheetOptions>
    <x:DisplayGridlines/>
    </x:WorksheetOptions>
    </x:ExcelWorksheet>
    </x:ExcelWorksheets>
    </x:ExcelWorkbook>
    </xml>
    <![endif]–>
    </head>
    <body>
    <table border=”0″>
    <tr>
    <td>ID</td>
    <td>Name</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
    <td style=”mso-number-format:\@;”>01234567890123456567678788989909000030</td>
    <td>Sarbashish B</td>
    </tr>
    </table>
    </body>
    </html>
    Sarbashish Bhattacharjee http://sarbashish.wordpress.com

  • DecimalFormat issues/Scientific notation

    I have 2 issues with formatting numbers with scientific notation via the DecimalFormat class
    ISSUE 1: Disregard of the number of MAXIMUM FRACTOINAL DIGITS
         in the code:
                                     NumberFormat nf = NumberFormat.getInstance();
                                    DecimalFormat df = (DecimalFormat)nf;
                                    df.applyPattern("#00.#E0");
                                    System.out.println( df.format(12345678)); 
                                       it printed: 12.35E6
         Why does it violate my request for one significant digit beyond the decimal
         point?. (Note, this problem
    only seems to occur when when the sum of MAX integer and Max fractional
    digits in my pattern is 4)
    ISSUE 2:
    Number of significant digits displayed:- I really just need a sanity check on this one
    The 1.4.2 API for DecimalFormat states
    ?     The number of significant digits in the mantissa is the sum of the minimum integer and
    maximum fraction digits, and is unaffected by the maximum integer digits. For example,
    12345 formatted with "##0.##E0" is "12.3E3". To show all digits, set the significant digits
    count to zero. The number of significant digits does not affect parsing.
    I tried this ? it displays 123.45E3, or 5 significant digits? Looks like the number of significant digits
    is MAX integer + MAX fractional digits in a pattern. Am I correct (and the API not correct)?
    thanks
    carol

    Thanks. I'm assuming you're responding to issue #1. I did try it, and it worked, as expected. I never seem to have an issue when all symbols
    preceding the decimal are 0. My issue, I suppose, is the inconsistency of how the formatting
    works, when it comes to the number of fractional digit positions. Most of the times it 'behaves' and
    only prints out the number of digits you ask, but sometimes it does not.
    I've tested quite a few combinations. I'm attaching the code (in case you need help sleeping tonight).
    The only 'pattern' I've noticed is that this issue only occurs when the total number of digits specified
    in the pattern (before and after decimal) is 4. (exception ... if all digits specified before the decimal
    are 0s, this never occurs)
    I know a simple solution ... make sure I never have
    a total of 4 #s and 0s in my pattern. But again, my question is why ... and/or ... does this type of
    inconsistency crop up elsewhere.
    import java.util.*;
    import java.text.*;
    public class x {
         public static void main(String [] args) {
              NumberFormat nf = NumberFormat.getInstance();
              DecimalFormat df = (DecimalFormat)nf;
              // these 3 work like I'd expect: 3 digits to the left, one to the right w/ rounding
              // signif digits = max int digits + max fractional digits
              df.applyPattern("000.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678)); // 123.5E5
              df.applyPattern("00.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678)); // 12.3E6
              df.applyPattern("0.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678)); // 1.2E7
              // signif digits = TOTAL int digits + max fractional digits
         System.out.println("X");
              df.applyPattern("###.#E0");                    // how did it decide to place decimal where it did?
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678)); // 12.35E6    // why did it violate my "1 max fractional digit"
                                                 // request? I would have expected 123.5E5
              df.applyPattern("##.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678)); // 12.3E6
              df.applyPattern("#.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678)); // 1.2E7
              //signif digits - TOTAL int digits + max fractional didgits
         System.out.println("");
         System.out.println("XXXXXXXX");
              df.applyPattern("#000.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678));  // 1234.6E4
              df.applyPattern("#00.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678));  // 12.35E6       // how did it decide to place decimal where it did?
                                                 // why did it violate my "1 max fractional digit"
                                                 // request? I would have expected 123.5E5
              df.applyPattern("#0.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678)); //  12.3E6
              // significant digtis = TOTAL int digits + max fractional digits
         System.out.println("");
              df.applyPattern("###0.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678));  // 1234.6E4
              df.applyPattern("##0.#E0");                    // how did it decide to place decimal where it did?
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678));  // 12.35E6     // why did it violate my "1 max fractional digit"
                                                 // request? I would have expected 123.5E5
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678));  // 12.35E6
              df.applyPattern("##.#E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678));  // 12.3E6
    //API example from DecimaFormat RE Scientific Notation.. api says this will print 12.3E3
              df.applyPattern("###.##E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345)); //12.345E3   //violates max fractiona digit request
    //NOTE DOCS ARE WRONG ... the number of significant digits is = to max integer digits (number of # and 0 prior
    // to decimal point)  PLUS max number of digits after the decimal point... NOT Min. Integer digits + Max fractional digits
              // suggested pattern
              df.applyPattern("000000.##E0");
              System.out.println( df.format(12345678));  //123456.78

  • Int printing out as scientific notation

    maybe doing something stupid here but I can't seem to pick it up.
    I have a Window that calls a subclass to display a calculator, and then returns the final value to the Window, if I input 10 digits it prints on as a 12345678E5
    something like that.
    Anywho here's the two methods that deal with value in the subclass( calculator )
    public int ReturnNumber(){//the method that will return the value from the keyboard
       int final_number = Integer.parseInt(number); 
        return final_number;   // returns value to question screen
      private void NextButtonActionPerformed (java.awt.event.ActionEvent evt) {
       if ( value.length() != allowable_answers[currentQuestionNumber] ){
                     JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(this, "Please make a valid entry.", "Invalid",
                     JOptionPane.WARNING_MESSAGE );
                     value.replace(0,counter,""); 
                     jTextField1.setText( null );
                     return;
        else {
                number = value.toString();
               setVisible(false);
               frame.final_number = ReturnNumber();
               frame.userMakeSelection = true;
               frame.FinalTimer.start();
               frame.ButtonSelected();Code from window that deals with the number
    if(Numeric[currentQuestionNumber]){
                currentAnswers[currentQuestionNumber][1] = final_number;// currentAnswers is a float[][]
                numeric_question_value[currentQuestionNumber][0] = final_number;// used in poll frequency
              }// numeric is a int[]
            else
                currentAnswers[currentQuestionNumber][currentChoice] = currentChoice;Is from trying to jam an int into float?
    Any suggestions
    Jim

    Is from trying to jam an int into float?That's exactly the cause. Here are some solutions:
    - Use java.text.DecimalFormat to format the output or cast the float to an integer type when you want to print it (presicion might become a problem).
    - Keep the number in an int or long all the time. This way you'll not lose any presicion.
    Explanation can be found in the API docs of Float.toString():"If the argument is NaN, the result is the string "NaN".
    Otherwise, the result is a string that represents the sign and magnitude (absolute value) of the argument. If the sign is negative, the first character of the result is '-' ('-'); if the sign is positive, no sign character appears in the result. As for the magnitude m:
    If m is less than 10^-3 or not less than 10^7, then it is represented in so-called "computerized scientific notation." Let n be the unique integer such that 10n<=m<1; then let a be the mathematically exact quotient of m and 10n so that 1<a<10. The magnitude is then represented as the integer part of a, as a single decimal digit, followed by '.' (.), followed by decimal digits representing the fractional part of a, followed by the letter 'E' (E), followed by a representation of n as a decimal integer, as produced by the method Integer.toString(int) of one argument."

  • DecimalFormat bug (?) with scientific notation

    Hi there,
    i'm currently developing an application dealing with scientific notation of double values.
    When i was curious about forcing the DecimalFormat formatter to print an explicit sign character in the exponential part, i found this strange behaviour:
    Source code (example generated to show effect):
    import java.text.*;
    public class DecimalFormatBugTest {
    public static void main(String[] arguments) {
    DecimalFormat decimalFormat = new DecimalFormat("+0.00000E00");
    double testValue1 = 1.23456d;
    double testValue2 = 0.98765d;
    System.out.println("Test 1: " + testValue1 + " --> " + decimalFormat.format(testValue1));
    System.out.println("Test 2: " + testValue2 + " --> " + decimalFormat.format(testValue2));
    Output:
    Test 1: 1.23456 --> +1,23456E+00
    Test 2: 0.98765 --> +9,87650E-+01
    This is what i don't understand:
    The "workaround" with the explicit "+" in front of the whole format expression is already strange, but when the exponent turns negative, i have output like "E-+00" which is completly senseless.
    This output was generated using Java2 1.4.0 @ Win2k.
    Thanks for your comments!
    Greets, Marvin

    i have no clue why thats behaving that way but i can tell u another workaroun for doing what u want...
    I think u got to take that "+" sign off from the format u are giving while constructing the object DecimalFormat. Convert the result of decimalFormat.format(testValue1) into string and check for the character at 0. If its negative then prefix the result with '-' else with '+'.

  • How can I get Numbers 3.2 to recognise 1e-5 as scientific notation?

    I just changed from Numbers '09 (2.3) to Number 3.2 on Mavericks (OS X 10.9.3) and the new version doesn't seem to recognise "e" or "E" as scientific notation. When I set the cell format to scientific and type "0.0015", Numbers returns "1.5×10^-03". I would however prefer to obtain "1.5e-3". And vice versa: if, after setting the cell format to scientific, I type "1.5e-3", it automatically formats the cell as text and I can't get it to recognise it as scientific notation. With "E" instead of "e", the problem is exactly the same. Does anyone know how I can change this setting? I already tried to search for an answer to my question, but couldn't find anything...

    if, after setting the cell format to scientific, I type "1.5e-3", it automatically formats the cell as text and I can't get it to recognise it as scientific notation.
    I can't duplicate the problem here, either when the cells are formatted as Automatic or as Scientific:
    When you type 1.5e-3 are you making sure not to enter a space after the e?  (When I type a space the cell automatically formats as Text.)
    SG

  • Scientific Notation on MID

    having trouble with a
    parsed out excel file.
    We import processor files into our application and do so with maybe 20 different processors.
    However one file is giving us a particular problem, even though the MID colum looks to be  a simple MID like this
    8788840008835  it actually shows up once  extracted like this 8.78884000884E+012 scientific notarion
    this is the only file we have this problem with and even if we go in and reformat the colum in various ways so the column looks correct it still spits out this scientific notation.
    tried number format likwe this  #LSNumberFormat(objSheet.Query.column2, "______")#
    and like this #numberformat(objSheet.Query.column2,'_______________________')#   it that keeps the number from being in scientific notation however it rounds the MID on the last number to the closest zero effectivly ruining the data.
    Any ideas on how to get around this?
    BTW its not the initial extraction thats doing it, we use it on many other excel files with no problems, only this file is giving us this problem
    Thanks in advance for any help

    scrollin,
    Your digits are all there. Just format those cells to either Text or Number. Leading zeros do tend to get lost unless you pre-format to text. You can force the cell format to text on the fly by prefixing your input with a single-quote.
    Regards,
    Jerry

  • Preventing automatic scientific notation conversion for excel o/p of bi pub

    I have a column in a query that contains a mixture of numbers and letters and hyphens. If the only letter is E, then I get scientific notation instead of the actual text,when I run the report for excel output and open it in excel.
    For example:
    185701E-02 becomes 1.86E+03 in the excel output of the report
    4962E6 becomes 4.96E+09
    will be really grateful if anyone can help

    See this thread:
    Re: Long account Numbers displayed in exponential form in excel using XML Pub
    Regards,
    Dave

  • WKT Contains Scientific Notation

    I have a table with an SDO geometry column. Our data is stored in Web Mercator to simplify displaying maps on a web page. My team's preferred way of shuffling geometries around is via its WKT since this is human readable and widely used. So we are fetching the WKT directly from the database using the GET_WKT() method (right term?) on the SDO geoemtry.
    The problem is that when coordinates exceed 10 million in magnitude, those coordinates are represented in E notation (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation#E_notation). I need to convert this WKT to a .NET object for use with a particular library, and while it supports conversion from WKT, it blows up on the E notation. I'd call it a bug with the library except for the fact that Oracle itself can't parse WKTs with E notation, either. SDO_UTIL.VALIDATE_WKTGEOMETRY returns FALSE for the WKT that GET_WKT() generated, and SDO_UTIL.FROM_WKTGEOMETRY throws an error. I've also tested that SDO_UTIL.SDO_UTIL.TO_WKTGEOMETRY returns the same WKT.
    A large amount of code already depends on the geometry being in WKT format, which means that switching to another format would not be an easy change. For the moment, I'm parsing the WKT using SQL Server's geometry type (see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.sqlserver.types.sqlgeometry_methods.aspx), and then converting it back to a WKT without E notation using its STAsText() method.
    Is there a way to force Oracle to not return E notation coordinates?
    This is occurring in both of the following versions of Oracle:
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    "CORE     10.2.0.1.0     Production"
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    "CORE     11.1.0.6.0     Production"
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    Sample SQL:
    The SRID in the following queries does not seem to exist out of the box in version 10 or Oracle. I ran these queries through Oracle SQL Developer.
    Query:
    SELECT MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,3785,NULL,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003,1),MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-13426771.266146,5334024.8870015,-13425624.710722,5326534.0582305,-13412553.978887,5325922.5620044,-13412936.164029,5333719.1388884,-13426771.266146,5334024.8870015)).GET_WKT() FROM DUAL;
    Result:
    POLYGON ((-1.3426771266146E7 5334024.8870015, -1.3425624710722E7 5326534.0582305, -1.3412553978887E7 5325922.5620044, -1.3412936164029E7 5333719.1388884, -1.3426771266146E7 5334024.8870015))
    Query:
    SELECT SDO_UTIL.VALIDATE_WKTGEOMETRY(MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,3857,NULL,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003,1),MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-13426771.266146,5334024.8870015,-13425624.710722,5326534.0582305,-13412553.978887,5325922.5620044,-13412936.164029,5333719.1388884,-13426771.266146,5334024.8870015)).GET_WKT()) FROM DUAL;
    Result:
    FALSE
    Query:
    SELECT SDO_UTIL.FROM_WKTGEOMETRY(MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,3785,NULL,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003,1),MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-13426771.266146,5334024.8870015,-13425624.710722,5326534.0582305,-13412553.978887,5325922.5620044,-13412936.164029,5333719.1388884,-13426771.266146,5334024.8870015)).GET_WKT()) FROM DUAL;
    Result:
    ORA-29532: Java call terminated by uncaught Java exception: java.lang.RuntimeException
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_UTIL", line 172
    29532. 00000 - "Java call terminated by uncaught Java exception: %s"
    *Cause:    A Java exception or error was signaled and could not be
    resolved by the Java code.
    *Action:   Modify Java code, if this behavior is not intended.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

    Hello jpmc26,
    I am going to guess that most of us live our lives between the 180s and have not really noticed this before. I would call it a bug that needs an SR opened but is the bug on the coming or the going? If you look in the Simple Features 1.2.1 specification on pages 52 and 53 they clearly say that an "approximate numeric literal" of mantissa + E + exponent is valid. However, Oracle Spatial does not support the 1.2.1 spec. Rather they support something akin to the 1.1.0 specification. On pages 28 and 29 of that version there is no mention of approximate numeric literals as it first shows up in the 1.2.0 specification.
    So I would say either:
    1) Oracle Spatial supporting only the 1.1.0 specification and not much interested in updating to current specifications, should remove the output of scientific notation from the SDO_UTIL.to_WKTGEOMETRY procedure (match 1.1.0 spec).
    -or-
    2) Oracle Spatial looking forward to future compatibility with new OGC standards, should add support for parsing scientific notation to the SDO_UTIL.from_WKTGEOMETRY procedure (prepare for 1.2.1 spec).
    I guess its a policy decision on their side. Please update the posting as to what they say as I am curious about the topic.
    Many folks have largely abandoned these java-based, outdated, OGC converters. Feel free to search the forum for complaints, myself being one of the complainers. When you said "a large amount of code already depends" on WKT, my first thought was that must be really slow. Writing your own SDO to WKT converter in PLSQL is really easy and I believe that's what most of us have done. The other direction is more challenging but doable - I need to rewrite mine but its works well enough for straightforward stuff.
    Cheers,
    Paul

  • No scientific notation in csv file

    Hi, All
    I have a package is extracting data from DB to CSV file.
    And I made up a column like '48484848484848484', when I load this column into CSV file,
    it shows me scientific notation along with the data.
    How can I get rid of the scientific notation ?
    I've tried data conversion, derived column. Nothing works.
    This really makes my frustrated.
    Thank you in advance.

    Hi,
    In that case, the SQL export process is fine.
    It's just Excel suggesting a scientific notation where it's not needed.
    You can get rid of the scientific notation by forcing your "long" numeric value into a string.
    For example
    "A001","Item code", "123376265892759026"
    instead of
    "A001", "Item code", 123376265892759026
    Sebastian Sajaroff Senior DBA Pharmacies Jean Coutu
    My data souce is like:
    Select '1234567891123' as column1,
              Id  as column2,
                          Name as column3,
    From Table1
    I think I already give column1 as a string. And I also tried to cast column1 to nvarchar or varchar or decimal or numeric, nothing works.

  • Remove scientific notation in report

    I'm calculating a number and placing it in a comment box on a report. This works fine, but one of the numbers has decided to display in scientific notation (1.52666667e-3). The problem is that the comment box is not large enough to display the scientific notation and gives no indication of not fitting into the box. Instead I see 1.52666 with no indication of the exponent. I'd much rather see .001527 however I don't want to force a STR format with "d.dddddd" because most numbers don't need this much precision and I'd probably run into errors for numbers such as 12345 which won't fit into the comment box with forced 6 digit precision. If I can force it out of scientific precision, it'll probably be fine.
    BTW: is there a certain number range where scientific notation becomes the default? If I knew this range I could then force the format with the STR function to display the way I want. e.g. IF x>-001 and x<.001 then STR(X,"d.dddd")
    Either method would probably work for me.
    thanks,
    James
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    MyVar is a 2 dimensional pointer (Channel Group, Channel) to numeric channels that meet some criteria.
    change box size: I had to make the box 3 times the width to display the number correctly. It shows 1.27933333333333E-03*. I'm appending the "*" to show the field is calculated instead of unadultered from the .csv. Maybe the problem isn't that the number is small, but that it's infinitely repeating. The number is calculate from the values .001919 - abs(.001919)/3
    Left Justify: no difference from right justify.
    Autoadj: shows 1.28E-
    I'm making a column of channels on the report, that's why the comment text is being set multiple times.
    Humphreyy - thanks for your ideas and help.

  • Scientific notation SSIS

    Hi,
    the situation is that I receive a column on excel, with format nvarchar, for example "8.0442 E +18" and I wanted to get "8044200073000360000" how do this transformation in ssis. From excel to sql server, using -> SSIS.
    the format is varchar (on excel), but I wanted to make an automated ETL, without going to excel every month to change format column. If I made derive a column "(DT_NUMERIC, 19.0)Value" has not worked for me. I tried to change from 19 to 35 but also
    gives error.
    David

    Its a float data and represents approximate numeric. As such I dont think you will able to get full
    precision as you like. Try using
    datatype like Decimal (38,2) in
    SQLServer
    Also try this
    http://www.sentientbeings.com/2012/03/how-to-stop-ssis-from-converting-text-to-scientific-notation-when-importing-from-excel/
    Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue
    Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

  • Scientific Notation in FormsCentral

    Can FormsCentral handl scientific notations when entered into a text field?

    We can only handle a standard character set.
    Randy

  • Scientific notation in numeric fields

    I need to be able to input scientific notation in numeric fields for my adobe forms.  I can put the pattern to num{9.99E} and it will allow me to put positive exponents and negative exponents to -3.  However, I need to input the number 4.76E-19 and it always changes it to 0.00E0.  What kind I do to keep this small of a number as 4.76E-19?

    Hi,
    Unfortunatly in approach with text field numbers will not be formatted in scientific  notation, users will have to type numbers in correct format.
    In approach with NumericField and patter {9.99E} i think there is some bug.
    I can type this number:
    After i lost focus from this field it will be formatted in tis style:
    And sfter button click i will get this:
    For big values everything working fine.
    Is this bug!?
    BR

Maybe you are looking for

  • Ipod classic wont start up or reset after sleeping mode

    Hi. I've just got a new iPod Classic 160Gb, one week old. Everything is fine except that it won't turn on after sleep mode is on. I cant do the restart. The iPod somehow does not response to the menu+start buttons at the same time. It however wakes t

  • Commit in pl/sql block;

    Hi Gurus, I have a task to delete Parent/child table records (On Delete: No action). I was getting integrity constraint error while I was trying to delete a parent record(this is obvious). I wrote a pl/sql block to perform this action. Version: 11.2

  • Reports on Historical data

    Hi, I have a Opportunity Cube which is storing all the historical data.  Now How can I create the report on this historical data like I want a report which says how many days a opportunities in each status.   In CUbe it is stored the total history of

  • What does UMA do for me?

    Hi all I asked this on another form but no response so I'll try a broader audience... I know what UMA is but what does UMA mean when it is displayed on my phone (8320)? details; I have an 8320 on the Rogers Network. I have unlimited data and email wi

  • Straight black line with no gray shade

    Greetings, Each time a make a 6px black horizontal line I notice that there is a gray "shadow" on top and below the black "core", how do I remove this gray component. Also, I noticed that this line has square ends. Is there a way to make them rounded