The configuration does not correspond to a SOAP RPC WSDL

Hi,
When in my proxy service I amd trying to make a service callout to my business service which is based on a third party wsdl (hence cannot be changed), i get the following error.
"The configuration does not correspond to a SOAP RPC WSDL. The WSDL of the target service may have changed making the configuration out of sync. Please edit the Service Callout to fix the configuration."
My wsdl operation --> style is of type rpc.
Regards,
Rahul.

Hi,
Have a look at the binding of your WSDL... a SOAP RPC WSDL should have
<soap:binding style="rpc"... and not
style="document"...The wsdl may be just out-of-sync, right button click at the parent folder and refresh will solve the problem...
Cheers,
Vlad

Similar Messages

  • Error – SAML Single Logout request does not correspond to the logged-in session participant

    We are relatively new to ADFS, having set up working rp-trusts with three partners in the last few months.  Our 4th partner is proving problematic.  Single sign in works, but the ADFS
    responds the single logout request from the RP with a status of Requester.  The ADFS event log shows
    The SAML Single Logout request does not correspond to the logged-in session participant.
    Requestor: https://test-sso.rp.com/fed/sp
    Request name identifier: Format: urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:persistent, NameQualifier: http://fs.idp.com/adfs/services/trust SPNameQualifier:
    https://test-sso.rp.com/fed/sp, SPProvidedId: 
    Logged-in session participants:
    Count: 1, [Issuer: https://test-sso.crmondemand.com/fed/sp, NameID: (Format: , NameQualifier: 
    SPNameQualifier: , SPProvidedId: )] 
    This request failed.
    User Action
    Verify that the claim provider trust or the relying party trust configuration is up to date. If the name identifier in the request is different from the name identifier
    in the session only by NameQualifier or SPNameQualifier, check and correct the name identifier policy issuance rule using the AD FS 2.0 Management snap-in.
    The LogoutRequest looks like this
    <samlp:LogoutRequest xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
    Destination="https://fs.timken.com/adfs/ls/"
                    ID="id-HAScmHCfwfuYk76bce6YBfO2uOM-"
    IssueInstant="2013-01-14T13:24:04Z"
    Version="2.0">
    . . . cert, etc. omitted . . .
    <saml:NameID xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"
    Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:persistent"
    NameQualifier="http://fs.idp.com/adfs/services/trust"
    SPNameQualifier="https://test-sso.rp.com/fed/sp"
    >jsmith</saml:NameID>
    <samlp:SessionIndex>_df13d31b-162e-42e1-8331-f36be6bf1194</samlp:SessionIndex>
    </samlp:LogoutRequest>
    The session index and the username in NameID matches the Response we got from our AuthRequest.  I don't know how to figure out what ADFS thinks does not match. 
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    For completeness sake, the Response to AuthRequest looked like this.
    <Subject>
                <NameID>jsmith</NameID>
                <SubjectConfirmation Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer">
                    <SubjectConfirmationData NotOnOrAfter="2013-01-14T13:28:52.199Z"
                                             Recipient="https://test-sso.rp.com/fed/sp/authnResponse20"
                                             />
                </SubjectConfirmation>
            </Subject>
            <Conditions NotBefore="2013-01-14T13:23:52.183Z"
                        NotOnOrAfter="2013-01-14T14:23:52.183Z"
                        >
                <AudienceRestriction>
                    <Audience>https://test-sso.rp.com/fed/sp</Audience>
                </AudienceRestriction>
            </Conditions>
            <AuthnStatement AuthnInstant="2013-01-14T13:10:43.826Z"
                            SessionIndex="_df13d31b-162e-42e1-8331-f36be6bf1194"
    >

    Okay, here are the relevant SAML messages.
    The <AuthnRequest>
    <samlp:AuthnRequest ID="_ced78e65-14d2-4c4d-8417-51f664a9e2e3"
                        Version="2.0"
                        IssueInstant="2013-02-04T13:29:20.887Z"
                        Destination="https://fs.timken.com/adfs/ls/"
                        Consent="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:unspecified"
                        xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
                        >
        <Issuer xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion">http://fs.timken.com/adfs/services/trust</Issuer>
        <Conditions xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion">
            <AudienceRestriction>
                <Audience>https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp</Audience>
            </AudienceRestriction>
        </Conditions>
    </samlp:AuthnRequest>The AuthnRequest Response<samlp:Response ID="_890f3128-6cae-414e-8272-30cde3bda94a"                Version="2.0"                IssueInstant="2013-02-04T13:29:29.748Z"                Destination="https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp/authnResponse20"                Consent="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:unspecified"                xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"                >    <Issuer xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion">http://fs.timken.com/adfs/services/trust</Issuer>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success" />    </samlp:Status>    <Assertion ID="_82f82c5c-2653-4e18-9308-349ebeb67743"               IssueInstant="2013-02-04T13:29:29.748Z"               Version="2.0"               xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"               >        <Issuer>http://fs.timken.com/adfs/services/trust</Issuer>        <ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">            <ds:SignedInfo>                <ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" />                <ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1" />                <ds:Reference URI="#_82f82c5c-2653-4e18-9308-349ebeb67743">                    <ds:Transforms>                        <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature" />                        <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" />                    </ds:Transforms>                    <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1" />                    <ds:DigestValue>RxZZLlbdh5eD6Ht4+aVna3Rtbnc=</ds:DigestValue>                </ds:Reference>            </ds:SignedInfo>            <ds:SignatureValue>Es8LAN9noqGIJEbgZe/...XW8LAv5Mgr3tOXpHRlcsJNss/A==</ds:SignatureValue>            <KeyInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">                <ds:X509Data>                    <ds:X509Certificate>MIIFDDCCA/SgAwIB...</ds:X509Certificate>                </ds:X509Data>            </KeyInfo>        </ds:Signature>        <Subject>            <NameID>mooreta</NameID>            <SubjectConfirmation Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer">                <SubjectConfirmationData NotOnOrAfter="2013-02-04T13:34:29.748Z"                                         Recipient="https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp/authnResponse20"                                         />            </SubjectConfirmation>        </Subject>        <Conditions NotBefore="2013-02-04T13:29:29.732Z"                    NotOnOrAfter="2013-02-04T14:29:29.732Z"                    >            <AudienceRestriction>                <Audience>https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp</Audience>            </AudienceRestriction>        </Conditions>        <AuthnStatement AuthnInstant="2013-02-04T13:29:29.545Z"                        SessionIndex="_82f82c5c-2653-4e18-9308-349ebeb67743"                        >            <AuthnContext>                <AuthnContextClassRef>urn:federation:authentication:windows</AuthnContextClassRef>            </AuthnContext>        </AuthnStatement>    </Assertion></samlp:Response>The LogoutRequest<samlp:LogoutRequest xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"                     Destination="https://fs.timken.com/adfs/ls/"                     ID="id-uvoTioVCLdMycE88o-6CU5RrSNM-"                     IssueInstant="2013-02-04T13:29:57Z"                     Version="2.0"                     >    <saml:Issuer xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"                 Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity"                 >https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp</saml:Issuer>    <dsig:Signature xmlns:dsig="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">        <dsig:SignedInfo>            <dsig:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" />            <dsig:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1" />            <dsig:Reference URI="#id-uvoTioVCLdMycE88o-6CU5RrSNM-">                <dsig:Transforms>                    <dsig:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature" />                    <dsig:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" />                </dsig:Transforms>                <dsig:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1" />                <dsig:DigestValue>ZT0yQqiaL2dD2a7rt6ywJ9EoM1I=</dsig:DigestValue>            </dsig:Reference>        </dsig:SignedInfo>        <dsig:SignatureValue>Z7F7zYS31y1K48FbUHevJT86+txOlPM9awlHiMNj1TiMxRAEVz1rOj2uG0oVMd7NkblkneCrE8aVtJuebdUY4Q0DAcXR8lSTuNEFocT2R6eCIwQb48xQqQMs8ZE6siPsPFMS+QAhpgDom/IY61L/.../NNxVg==</dsig:SignatureValue>        <dsig:KeyInfo>            <dsig:X509Data>                <dsig:X509Certificate>MIIFxTCCBK2gAwIBAgIQAN+.../G6p95pNm1ZAqroUjufLeHO4q34Mx3xNyw0tmyjmWgkxY11Pa+M0gCeLOdLzxafIOXUFXOhKfOUg4Jp4S+/sCVcd9fBDPvfEHSr8uMmQC2IdQaRE7IvZdRF0OUP+l1MpRBkMsy98hPXTBK6n1ivklOxzmWie88jav8gzjWhwQC5Ia2/JNYxVBkPsNkRw86n8KBnlsumU9EV0dAeXTOaehKtG+RNnD1Gt4Y34TQccaIbf7OTLisY4kMkjZbRu3sJnX9KjM=</dsig:X509Certificate>            </dsig:X509Data>        </dsig:KeyInfo>    </dsig:Signature>    <saml:NameID xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"                 Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:persistent"                 NameQualifier="http://fs.timken.com/adfs/services/trust"                 SPNameQualifier="https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp"                 >mooreta</saml:NameID>    <samlp:SessionIndex>_82f82c5c-2653-4e18-9308-349ebeb67743</samlp:SessionIndex></samlp:LogoutRequest>The LogoutRequest Response<samlp:LogoutResponse ID="_bf7199a8-3248-4201-9ca4-609bec5404d6"                      Version="2.0"                      IssueInstant="2013-02-04T13:29:59.076Z"                      Destination="https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp/samlv20"                      Consent="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:unspecified"                      InResponseTo="id-uvoTioVCLdMycE88o-6CU5RrSNM-"                      xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"                      >    <Issuer xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion">http://fs.timken.com/adfs/services/trust</Issuer>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Requester" />    </samlp:Status></samlp:LogoutResponse>The ADFS Error Log EntryThe SAML Single Logout request does not correspond to the logged-in session participant. Requestor: https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp Request name identifier: Format: urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:persistent, NameQualifier: http://fs.timken.com/adfs/services/trust SPNameQualifier: https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp, SPProvidedId:  Logged-in session participants: Count: 1, [Issuer: https://test-sso.salesdemand.com/fed/sp, NameID: (Format: , NameQualifier:  SPNameQualifier: , SPProvidedId: )]  This request failed. User Action Verify that the claim provider trust or the relying party trust configuration is up to date. If the name identifier in the request is different from the name identifier in the session only by NameQualifier or SPNameQualifier, check and correct the name identifier policy issuance rule using the AD FS 2.0 Management snap-in.

  • The SOAP action specified on the message, '', does not match the HTTP SOAP

    Error Message: " The SOAP action specified on the message, '', does not match the HTTP SOAP Action"
    we need establish webservice link with our vendors, they are on windows platform and we are on java.
    they gave us this URL:
    http://mesadstage.webhop.net/MesadSCService/EBOrderService.svc?wsdl
    I create a project in Netbeans, then add Web Service Client, put the URL in, after the some configuration and source code generation, i put these codes in the public void main(String[]), it always returned the error msg:
    Error Message: "The SOAP action specified on the message, '', does not match the HTTP SOAP Action, 'http://tempuri.org/IEBOrderService/GetData'. "
    what was wrong? any thing that I din configured? or it caused by different platforms???
    h2. error message (stack trace)
    javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: The SOAP action specified on the message, '', does not match the HTTP SOAP Action, http://tempuri.org/IEBOrderService/GetData'.
    at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.marshaller.impl.alt.MethodMarshallerUtils.createSystemException(MethodMarshallerUtils.java:1326)
    at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.marshaller.impl.alt.MethodMarshallerUtils.demarshalFaultResponse(MethodMarshallerUtils.java:1052)
    at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.marshaller.impl.alt.DocLitWrappedMethodMarshaller.demarshalFaultResponse(DocLitWrappedMethodMarshaller.java:659)
    at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.client.proxy.JAXWSProxyHandler.getFaultResponse(JAXWSProxyHandler.java:577)
    at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.client.proxy.JAXWSProxyHandler.createResponse(JAXWSProxyHandler.java:520)
    at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.client.proxy.JAXWSProxyHandler.invokeSEIMethod(JAXWSProxyHandler.java:386)
    at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.client.proxy.JAXWSProxyHandler.invoke(JAXWSProxyHandler.java:171)
    at $Proxy11.getData(Unknown Source)
    at javaapplication7.Main.a(Main.java:28)
    at javaapplication7.Main.main(Main.java:43)
    h2. source code:
    try {
    org.tempuri.EBOrderService service = new org.tempuri.EBOrderService();
    org.tempuri.IEBOrderService port = service.getWSHttpBindingIEBOrderService();
    java.lang.Integer value = Integer.valueOf(0);
    java.lang.String result = port.getData(value);
    System.out.println("Result = " + result);
    } catch (Exception ex) {
    System.out.println("Error = " + ex.getMessage());
    ex.printStackTrace();
    }

    Try to rebuild the index file of the troubled folder.
    Right-click the folder - Properties - Repair Folder

  • While configuring speed 1000 i am getting error as sw2-storage-vdc(config-if)# speed 1000 ERROR: Ethernet2/6: Configuration does not match the port capability.

    storage-vdc(config-if)# show module
    Mod  Ports  Module-Type                         Model              Status
    2    32     1/10 Gbps Ethernet Module           N7K-F132XP-15      ok
    sw1-gd78(config-if)# sh module
    Mod  Ports  Module-Type                         Model              Status
    2    48     1/2/4/8 Gbps FC Module              DS-X9248-96K9      ok
    4    8      10 Gbps FCoE Module                 DS-X9708-K9        ok
    7    0      Supervisor/Fabric-2a                DS-X9530-SF2AK9    active *
    8    0      Supervisor/Fabric-2a                DS-X9530-SF2AK9    ha-standby
    10   22     4x1GE IPS, 18x1/2/4Gbps FC Module   DS-X9304-18K9      ok
    Mod  Sw              Hw      World-Wide-Name(s) (WWN)
    2    5.2(2)          1.1     20:41:00:0d:ec:fb:8a:00 to 20:70:00:0d:ec:fb:8a:00
    4    5.2(2)          0.107   --
    7    5.2(2)          1.8     --
    8    5.2(2)          1.8     --
    10   5.2(2)          1.3     22:41:00:0d:ec:fb:8a:00 to 22:52:00:0d:ec:fb:8a:00
    sw1-gd78(config-if)# sh run int ethernet4/6
    !Command: show running-config interface Ethernet4/6
    !Time: Mon Feb 20 22:56:12 2012
    version 5.2(2)
    interface Ethernet4/6
      no shutdown
    sw1-gd78(config-if)# no shut
    sw1-gd78(config-if)# speed 1000
    ERROR: Ethernet4/6: Configuration does not match the port capability.
    sw1-gd72# sh int ethernet4/6 capabilities
    Ethernet4/6
      Model:                 DS-X9708-K9
      Type (SFP capable):    10Gbase-SR
      Speed:                 1000,10000
      Duplex:                full
      Trunk encap. type:     802.1Q
      Channel:               yes
      Broadcast suppression: percentage(0-100)
      Flowcontrol:           rx-(off/on/desired),tx-(off/on/desired)
      Rate mode:             dedicated
      QOS scheduling:        rx-(2q4t),tx-(1p3q4t)
      CoS rewrite:           yes
      ToS rewrite:           yes
      SPAN:                  yes
      UDLD:                  yes
      Link Debounce:         yes
      Link Debounce Time:    yes
      MDIX:                  no
      Port Group Members:    none
      TDR capable:           no
      FabricPath capable:    yes
      Port mode:             Switched
    sw1-gd72# sh int ethernet4/6 transceiver details
    Ethernet4/6
        transceiver is present
        type is 10Gbase-SR
        name is CISCO-FINISAR
        part number is FTLX8571D3BCL-CS
        revision is C
        serial number is FNS12090EMJ
        nominal bitrate is 10300 MBit/sec
        Link length supported for 50/125um OM2 fiber is 82 m
        Link length supported for 50/125um OM3 fiber is 300 m
        Link length supported for 62.5/125um fiber is 26 m
        cisco id is --
        cisco extended id number is 4
               SFP Detail Diagnostics Information (internal calibration)
                                         Alarms                  Warnings
                                    High        Low         High          Low
      Temperature   36.21 C        75.00 C     -5.00 C     70.00 C        0.00 C
      Voltage        3.29 V         3.63 V      2.97 V      3.46 V        3.13 V
      Current        8.11 mA       11.80 mA     4.00 mA    10.80 mA       5.00 mA
      Tx Power       -2.65 dBm       1.49 dBm  -11.30 dBm   -1.50 dBm     -7.30 dBm
      Rx Power       -2.21 dBm       1.99 dBm  -13.97 dBm   -1.00 dBm     -9.91 dBm
      Transmit Fault Count = 0
      Note: ++  high-alarm; +  high-warning; --  low-alarm; -  low-warning

    Ankit,
    You are trying to set speed 1000 on a 10g sfp.
    type is 10Gbase-SR
    You will need to insert a 1gig sfp and then you will be able to set the speed.
    Also, I noticed that you posted first with interface 2/6 and the output you gave me was for 4/6. Are you sure you're in the right interface?

  • Object in import-file header does not correspond to the migration object

    Hi Forum,
    I have loaded Business partner successfully with the file created in Workbench with test data.
    Now I want to load the data from Application server. But i am getting the error
    "Object in import-file header does not correspond to the migration object".
    I have read that the import file should have 3 types of record
    1. Header record corrs to the structure TEMINFO
    2. Actual data records
    3. Final record for individual object.
    I am not sure where I am making a mistake
    my files header looks like
    <004F><Space><&INFO><Company><Migration Object><User><Date><Time>
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance

    I am assuming you are in transaction EMIGIMP loading a converted migration file for import, correct?
    If so, you should be able to read the company, mig. object, user name, etc. in the import file tab overview.  If conversion did not work correctly, this info will not display here. 
    It is possible you are missing some data in the header, or spacing is not correct.  Are you converting the input file with program REMIG_FILE_TRANSFORM or are you trying to create the migration file yourself?

  • "The hostname does not resolve to any configured address..."

    I think this is a stupid question   But I just can't remember what I'm missing.  It's been a while since I set one of these up.
    I have just installed Lion and Server on a Mac Mini 2.66GHz C2D
    I'm not trying to change the Open Directory settins from Standalone directory to an Open Directory Master.
    When I do it saks me to create a directory adminstrator account.  No problem.  But when I hit continue on that screen I get a message saying:
    "The hostname does not resolve to any configured address.  Please ensure your hostname and network configuration is correct."
    Now, I think this is because I haven't set up any DNS zones yet.  But I'm not sure about that...
    So can anyone(s) help me with these two things:
    1. Is the Open Directory master I'm trying to set up dependent on setting up DNS first?
    2. If so, can someone tell me what I'm supposed to do in the DNS, because for the life of me I can't remember anything about it.
    I'll be very grateful for any help...
    Thanks!
    David.

    Hi again.  Thanks for the help.  So that clears up that mystery.  However...
    Ok, so as already noted, I've completely forgotten how I set this up last time, but I remember that I still have an archive of my old Snow Leopard server before I upgraded it to Lion.
    So I've fired that up in Server Admin to see how I set up the DNS in that, and see if that can remind me how to set up the same on my new Lion server.
    I believe I've set it all up correctly, but alas, I'm still getting the same error message when I try to create the open directory master.  So I must be doing something wrong still.  I just wish I knew what that was.
    I've attached screen shots of my settings.  If you or anyone else can tell me what I'm doing wrong, then again, I'd be grateful!
    The routing is done by my Airport Extreme, with the .200 IP address being assigned by DHCP client ID.  The IP address of this machine is in fact 10.0.1.200.  These settings are exactly the same (with one exception) as my (working) Snow Leopard server and just to be clear I'm not trying to run both servers at once!   
    The one exception is this:  The first line in the screen shot says "1.0.10.in-..." (from the non-working Lion server), whereas on my Snow Leopard server, the same line says "200.1.0.10.in-..."  Everything else is the same.  I can't seem to see any way of "correcting" that.  Is that the cause of the problem? And if so, how do I fix it?  If not, what *is* the problem?
    Thanks!
    David.

  • Managed System Configuration ! The table does not contain any data !

    Hi,
    In Sol Man Setup , Managed System Configuration, in phase 6 - Create Logical Componets -
    There is no Product Version and Product Instance Available.
    The message is :  " The table does not contain any data "
    How can correct this problem ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    while creating new Logical Component via SMSY , you need to specify Product first.
    e.g. if you managed system is ERP 6.0 , select Product as SAP ERP
    once you select Product , it automatically fetches information for product Version and Main Instance depending upon Product field input.
    Please check and let us know if issue still persits.
    Thanks,
    Rupali

  • Cannot load svn plugin. Error is "Resulting configuration does not contain the platform."

    I am getting the following error when installing the svn
    plugin.
    Resulting configuration does not contain the platform.
    When I just try to find updates I get the same error. Is my
    installation messed up or is flex builder a special eclipse
    configuration?
    Thanks,
    Chris

    Flex Builder 3 does not come with subversion plugin, so it
    must be something you have installed.uninstall that first
    P.S you are using official version right?
    http://subclipse.tigris.org
    here is instructions :
    http://subclipse.tigris.org/install.html

  • When I change the configuration of my iPad apps (I organise them on the laptop, then sync) the arrangement does not transfer to the iPad.

    When I change the configuration of my iPad apps (I organise them on the laptop, then sync) the arrangement does not transfer to the iPad.

    Sounds like your iPhones software may be corrupt. Try placing the iPhone into recovery mode. To do this, follow the steps in this article:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1808
    Hope this helps
    - Greg

  • BPE_adapter The process does not support the given synchronous interface

    We are using PI 7.0 Sp 14 .
    Old dev box needed to be upgrade with 64 bit hardware. We did a fresh installation and done all the technical configuraiton. Imported SLD , IR,ID , Runtime value mapping . All scenario working fine after migration except one particular scenari which involves SOAP Web service .
    Our scenario is Extern system send SOAP call to PI  - BPM_SYNC_ASYnc_process --> BPM Proxy_send 
    this BPM proxy_send   to ECC R/eceiver at R/3
    We are getting the following error after migraiton. Please help
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--
    Call Adapter
    -->
    Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
    <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
    <SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">SYNCHONOUS_MESSAGE</SAP:Code>
    <SAP:P1 />
    <SAP:P2 />
    <SAP:P3 />
    <SAP:P4 />
    <SAP:AdditionalText />
    <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
    <SAP:Stack>The process does not support the given synchronous interface or does not support synchronous messages</SAP:Stack>
    <SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
    </SAP:Error>

    Is there any other Configuration to be done at the Abap side part from BPE_XI_customising (Automatic customising) done as part of the post installation steps .
    Wondering any other configuration needs to be done at the ABAP side (as BPE is running on the ABAp stack) to resolve this.
    Thanks

  • Win2012R2 error 364 Content file download failed.Reason: The server does not support the necessary HTTP protocol.

    Im running WSUS on Windows 2012 R2. Installed over "Add Roles and Features". Configured, synchronisation works, but can not download any updates.
    System
    Provider
    Name]
    Windows Server Update
    Services
    EventID
    364
    Qualifiers]
    0
    Level
    2
    Task
    2
    Keywords
    0x80000000000000
    TimeCreated
    SystemTime]
    2014-08-27T06:43:36.000000000Z
    EventRecordID
    390
    Channel
    Application
    Computer
    wsus-server.murrcz.local
    Security
    EventData
    Content file download
    failed. Reason: The server does not support the necessary HTTP protocol.
    Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) requires that the server support
    the Range protocol header. Source File:
    /msdownload/update/software/crup/2011/03/windows6.1-kb2506014-x64_8c22199a738b51dbfe78262ca21ba98cf8bdeca2.cab
    Destination File:
    C:\WSUS-updates\WsusContent\A2\8C22199A738B51DBFE78262CA21BA98CF8BDECA2.cab
    The online help not works:
    Content download has failed. BITS service is not starting or is  stopping during downloads.
    Open a command window.
    Type sc config bits start= auto
    Type net stop bits && net start bits
    Type net stop wsusservice && net start wsusservice
    Start WSUS 3.0: Click Start, click Administrative Tools, then click
    Microsoft Windows Server Update Services v3.0.
    Click Synchronization Results.
    In the Action pane, click Synchronize Now.
    Verify
    Look for the corresponding error event.
    Open a command window.
    Type cd <WSUSInstallDir>\Tools
    Type wsusutil checkhealth
    Type eventvwr
    Review the Application log for the most recent events from source Windows Server Update Services and event id 10030.
    The KB922330 not aplicable, ExecuteSQL.exe not present.
    Please help.
    Thanks

    .\SQLCMD.EXE -S \\.\pipe\MICROSOFT##WID\tsql\query -d "SUSDB" -Q "update tbConfigurationC set BitDownloadPriorityForegroud=1"
    This should be considered a temporary fix. It will saturate your Internet connection during periods of WSUS downloads in this configuration.
    The correct and permanent fix should be to resolve the failure of your perimeter device to properly support the HTTP v1.1 protocol specification (which is now some 14 years old).
    Either your device is misconfigured, or it needs a firmware update to support the full specification.
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    SolarWinds Head Geek
    Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
    My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
    http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
    The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

  • Any idea what this errorr means? the data type of the reference does not match the data type of the variable

    I am using Veristand 2014, Scan Engine and EtherCat Custom Device.  I have not had this error before, but I was trying to deploy my System Definition File (run) to the Target (cRio 9024 with 6 modules) and it failed. It wouldn't even try to communicate with the target. I get the 'connection refused' error.  
    I created a new Veristand project
    I added the Scan Engine and EtherCat custom device.
    I changed the IP address and auto-detected my modules
    i noticed tat Veristand didn't find one of my modules that was there earlier. (this week)
     So, i went to NiMax to make sure software was installed and even reinstalled Scan Engine and Veristand just to make sure.
    Now, it finds the module, but when i go to deploy it getsto the last step of deploying the code to the target, and then it fails.
    Any thoughts?
    Start Date: 4/10/2015 11:48 AM
    • Loading System Definition file: C:\Users\Public\Documents\National Instruments\NI VeriStand 2014\Projects\testChassis\testChassis.nivssdf
    • Initializing TCP subsystem...
    • Starting TCP Loops...
    • Connection established with target Controller.
    • Preparing to synchronize with targets...
    • Querying the active System Definition file from the targets...
    • Stopping TCP loops.
    Waiting for TCP loops to shut down...
    • TCP loops shut down successfully.
    • Unloading System Definition file...
    • Connection with target Controller has been lost.
    • Start Date: 4/10/2015 11:48 AM
    • Loading System Definition file: C:\Users\Public\Documents\National Instruments\NI VeriStand 2014\Projects\testChassis\testChassis.nivssdf
    • Preparing to deploy the System Definition to the targets...
    • Compiling the System Definition file...
    • Initializing TCP subsystem...
    • Starting TCP Loops...
    • Connection established with target Controller.
    • Sending reset command to all targets...
    • Preparing to deploy files to the targets...
    • Starting download for target Controller...
    • Opening FTP session to IP 10.12.0.48...
    • Processing Action on Deploy VIs...
    • Setting target scan rate to 10000 (uSec)... Done.
    • Gathering target dependency files...
    • Downloading testChassis.nivssdf [92 kB] (file 1 of 4)
    • Downloading testChassis_Controller.nivsdat [204 kB] (file 2 of 4)
    • Downloading CalibrationData.nivscal [0 kB] (file 3 of 4)
    • Downloading testChassis_Controller.nivsparam [0 kB] (file 4 of 4)
    • Closing FTP session...
    • Files successfully deployed to the targets.
    • Starting deployment group 1...
    The VeriStand Gateway encountered an error while deploying the System Definition file.
    Details:
    Error -66212 occurred at Project Window.lvlibroject Window.vi >> Project Window.lvlib:Command Loop.vi >> NI_VS Workspace ExecutionAPI.lvlib:NI VeriStand - Connect to System.vi
    Possible reason(s):
    LabVIEW: The data type of the reference does not match the data type of the variable.
    =========================
    NI VeriStand: NI VeriStand Engine.lvlib:VeriStand Engine Wrapper (RT).vi >> NI VeriStand Engine.lvlib:VeriStand Engine.vi >> NI VeriStand Engine.lvlib:VeriStand Engine State Machine.vi >> NI VeriStand Engine.lvlib:Initialize Inline Custom Devices.vi >> Custom Devices Storage.lvlib:Initialize Device (HW Interface).vi
    • Sending reset command to all targets...
    • Stopping TCP loops.
    Waiting for TCP loops to shut down...
    • TCP loops shut down successfully.
    • Unloading System Definition file...
    • Connection with target Controller has been lost.

    Can you deploy if you only have the two 9401 modules in the chassis (no other modules) and in the sysdef?  I meant to ask if you could attach your system definition file to the forum post so we can see it as well (sorry for the confusion).  
    Are you using any of the specialty configurations for the 9401 modules? (ex: counter, PWM, quadrature, etc)
    You will probably want to post this on the support page for the Scan Engine/EtherCAT Custom Device: https://decibel.ni.com/content/thread/8671  
    Custom devices aren't officially supported by NI, so technical questions and issues are handled on the above page.
    Kevin W.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • I connect my iPad to my PC and open iTunes, but the iPad does not show up in sidebar.  I want to sync. How do I do it?

    I have my PC on, then plug in my iPad (which is on) and open iTunes.  The iPad does not show up in the sidebar.  How do you get it to show up so that I can select the iPad and then configure the sync settings in each of the settings panes....hoping that these actually show up.
    In the manual it says "log in to your computer user account before connecting iPad".  I am the only user of this PC...does this mean some other user account.  I am confused.  I need "baby steps" to tell me how to do all this....very senior and just learning about this wonderful machine. I will very much appreciate your help.

    If you are the only user on your computer you probably don't have multiple user accounts set up and can disregard that.  If you are using iTunes 11 go to View>Show Sidebar.  Now see if your iPad appears under Devices on the left side when you connect it.  If it does, click on the name of your iPad on the left side and your iTunes sync settings options will appear in folders with tabbed headings to the right.
    If it doesn't appear on the left side, follow the troubleshooting steps shown in this article: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1538.

  • Payroll period does not correspond to master data error in INLK run & soln

    Dear All,
    Just wanted to share this Issue and solution which i found after debugging.
    I am not sure it is 100% correct.
    I am working on indian payroll and was doing lagacy data transfer with INLK schema
    i was used to get error '2 payroll period does not correspond to master data'
    and this was for only new joinees in that period .what i found out after debugging is
    for e.g. employee is hired in 03.06.2011 .and record in t558b is
    90300035 1  2011    1 2011 3 01.06.2011 31.06.2011
    where 01.06.2011 is a for period begin date ,
    now in payroll program this is being checked with joining date in following subroutine check_aper_versus_t558b
    so it ends up with above error.now if i go and change 01.06.2011 to 03.06.2011 in T558B then payroll will be successful.
    I dont no whether this is right approach but this removed that error.Just wanted to share so
    It might help the members.

    la diferencia es la fecha del campo FPBEG que debe ser la fecha para los empleados que no esten con el año o periodo completo
    the difference is the date field FPBEG Table T558B to be the date for employees who are not full with the year or period

  • The security database on the server does not have a computer account for this workstation trust relationship

    When I try to log on to my DC it says "The security database on the server does not have a computer account for this workstation trust relationship". It won't let me log on. I installed another server server 2012r2  (its virtual )
    and I can get to ADSI edit. 
    I think what happened was I had a pc that could not connect without unplugging the network cable. So I found this fix 
    FIX: “The security database on the server does not have a computer account for this workstation trust relationship”2032011
    I’ve seen a lot of solutions, or suggestions rather, with regard to the error in the title of this post.  In my experience, the problem can almost always be resolved without extra domain add/removes and reboots, which is the most prevalent solution I have
    seen around.  Usually, this issue is due to a mismatch between attributes of the computer account in Active Directory and those values on the system itself.  Here are the steps I take to fix this issue when it crops up:
    Open up Active Directory Users & Computers pointed to the domain the computer account resides in
    From the “View” pull-down menu, make sure that “Advanced Features” is checked
    Navigate to the part of your organizational unit (OU) structure where the computer account for this server resides
    Open the Properties for the computer object
    Choose the “Attribute Editor” tab on the Properties dialog box
    Check the Attributes dNSHostName & servicePrincipalName – anywhere that a fully qualified hostname is specified (e.g. myserver.mydomainname.com), make sure that the entry matches the hostname
    you have configured when you go here on your server: Start -> Computer -> Right-Click, Properties -> Change Settings (under “Computer name, domain… settings”) -> Full Computer Name
    As an example, for a fictitious W2K8 R2 server whose Full Computer Name is “srv1.mydomainname.com”, these attribute/value pairs should be in Active Directory:
    dNSHostName:
    srv1.mydomainname.com
    servicePrincipalName:
    HOST/SRV1
    HOST/srv1.mydomainname.com
    RestrictedKrbHost/SRV1
    RestrictedKrbHost/srv1.mydomainname.com
    TERMSRV/SRV1
    TERMSRV/srv1.mydomainname.com"
    Not reading it carefully I add a computer with the same name as the pc having the issue and followed the above. The problem is that I did not notice that the spn did not want the name of my server (serv1) but the name of the trouble
    pc.
    dcdiag output
    PS C:\Users\administrator.TOM> dcdiag.exe
    Directory Server Diagnosis
    Performing initial setup:
       Trying to find home server...
       ***Error: DC3 is not a Directory Server.  Must specify /s:<Directory Server> or  /n:<Naming Context> or nothing to
       use the local machine.
       ERROR: Could not find home server.
    PS C:\Users\administrator.TOM> dcdiag.exe /s:DC2
    Directory Server Diagnosis
    Performing initial setup:
       * Identified AD Forest.
       Done gathering initial info.
    Doing initial required tests
       Testing server: Default-First-Site\DC2
          Starting test: Connectivity
             The host 9e0dca7a-d017-445a-b354-adee5ff53d48._msdcs.TOM could not be resolved to an IP address. Check the DN
             server, DHCP, server name, etc.
             Neither the the server name (DC2.TOM) nor the Guid DNS name (9e0dca7a-d017-445a-b354-adee5ff53d48._msdcs.TOM)
             could be resolved by DNS.  Check that the server is up and is registered correctly with the DNS server.
             Got error while checking LDAP and RPC connectivity. Please check your firewall settings.
             ......................... DC2 failed test Connectivity
    Doing primary tests
       Testing server: Default-First-Site\DC2
          Skipping all tests, because server DC2 is not responding to directory service requests.
       Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation
       Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation
       Running partition tests on : Schema
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation
       Running partition tests on : Configuration
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation
       Running partition tests on : TOM
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... TOM passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... TOM passed test CrossRefValidation
       Running enterprise tests on : TOM
          Starting test: LocatorCheck
             ......................... TOM passed test LocatorCheck
          Starting test: Intersite
             ......................... TOM passed test Intersite
    PS C:\Users\administrator.TOM> regsvr32 schmmgmt.dll
    PS C:\Users\administrator.TOM> netdig /fix
    netdig : The term 'netdig' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program.
    Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
    At line:1 char:1
    + netdig /fix
    + ~~~~~~
        + CategoryInfo          : ObjectNotFound: (netdig:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
    PS C:\Users\administrator.TOM> Setup /PrepareSchema
    Setup : The term 'Setup' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program. Check
    the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
    At line:1 char:1
    + Setup /PrepareSchema
    + ~~~~~
        + CategoryInfo          : ObjectNotFound: (Setup:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
    PS C:\Users\administrator.TOM> netdiag /test
    netdiag : The term 'netdiag' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program.
    Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
    At line:1 char:1
    + netdiag /test
    + ~~~~~~~
        + CategoryInfo          : ObjectNotFound: (netdiag:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
    PS C:\Users\administrator.TOM> nslooup
    nslooup : The term 'nslooup' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program.
    Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
    At line:1 char:1
    + nslooup
    + ~~~~~~~
        + CategoryInfo          : ObjectNotFound: (nslooup:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
    PS C:\Users\administrator.TOM>

    Ok fixed. 
    At a elevated cmd prompt run ;
    C:\Users\administrator.TOM>setspn -x
    As you can see the DC serv1 had duplicate SPNs.
    Checking domain DC=TOM
    Processing entry 1
    HOST/serv1.TOM is registered on these accounts:
            CN=SERV1,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=TOM
            CN=C00049,CN=Computers,DC=TOM
    {14E52635-0A95-4a5c-BDB1-E0D0C703B6C8}/TOWN-HBWJ29ZOQC is registered on these ac
    counts:
            CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=TOM
            CN=TOWN-HBWJ29ZOQC,CN=Computers,DC=TOM
    {14E52635-0A95-4a5c-BDB1-E0D0C703B6C8}/town-hbwj29zoqc.TOM is registered on thes
    e accounts:
            CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=TOM
            CN=TOWN-HBWJ29ZOQC,CN=Computers,DC=TOM
    RestrictedKrbHost/serv1 is registered on these accounts:
            CN=C00049,CN=Computers,DC=TOM
            CN=SERV1,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=TOM
    RestrictedKrbHost/serv1.TOM is registered on these accounts:
            CN=C00049,CN=Computers,DC=TOM
            CN=SERV1,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=TOM
    found 5 groups of duplicate SPNs.
    Went to the computers OU and changed computer c00049 to the correct SPN. Now I have a new issues, I'll start a new thread.

Maybe you are looking for