The current responsibility context has been switched to message

Hi,
I'm trying to suppress the message "The current responsibility context has been switched to:" in my custom OAF page.
I have tried the solutions mentioned in the below threads , but its not resolved. I'm new to OAF and cannot be sure if I've done everything that is necessary.
Message "The Current Responsibility Context Has Been Switched To:XXXXX"
Re: Responsibility Context Region
Can anyone please guide me through this issue?
Thanks
-Madhuri

Hi Shreevat,
I did go through the metalink document you suggested. But it wasn't the appropriate solution for our issue. I used the solution suggested in another thread in this forum and it worked.
This is the thread for anyone's future reference as well:
Re: Responsibility Context Region
FYI,
I added a new VO which fetched the list of responsibilities for the user that was logged in and assigned the first responsibility from that list explicitly.
Below are the specific lines of code added in CO.processRequest which worked
pageContext.removeParameter("OARespContextSwitcherValuesKey");
pageContext.removeTransactionTransientValue("OARespContextSwitcherValuesKey");
pageContext.changeResponsibility(SupervisorResp,RespAppl);
Thanks for all your help.
-Madhuri

Similar Messages

  • Current responsibility context has been switched to -- throwing Information

    Hi All,
    I am getting this "Information" on OAF Page when user is going to create and click for the save button am getting this Information on the Header
    please tell me how can i get rid of this Information,
    Here in my code i am not throwing any information like this but
    why it is behaving like this in my oaf page its a standard page,
    In this page i have made some controller extension but is it related to that here am using different requirement.
    Inforamtion :
    The current responsbility context has been switched to MFG-0180-OSA
    Switch Responsibility -- Listbox (MFG-0180-OSA)
    Thank you
    please how can i solve this one.

    Hi This happens when the redirected page/ function is available from more than one responsibility which you have.
    MFG-0180-OSA is your custom responsibility and the function you are getting is available in some other responsibility?
    And check this thread too
    Responsibility Context Region
    Thanks,
    With regards,
    Kali.
    OSSi.

  • My iPhone 5 was stolen and ever since has been showing offline in the 'find my iPhone app' this has been showing since the theft does this mean that they have failed to get into the phone and it has been switched off

    My sons iPhone 5 was stolen out of his blazer pocket while in a games lesson, this was last period and on return to get changed find that someone from his class had stolen his phone from his zipped pocket. Straight away I went onto the find my iPhone on my phone and it has been showing offline since the phone was stolen. The phone had a password set on it and I have notified the police, school and also our carrier. The phone has been offline now for 32 hours, would this mean they have been unable to access the phone and switched it off? Is it possible for the phone to be jail broken while this password has been set. I am most angry that this has happened and the changing rooms are always locked while the lessons take place, so this is someone within my sons class that has stolen the phone. Being a Friday And last lesson the phone is long gone now but I'm hoping with the security measures we have put in place with the pass code etc.... That they won't be able to unlock the phone to use it. The phone was only 2 days old as my son had only just upgraded :(

    All you may infer is the device hasn't been turned on where it can connect to Wi-Fi.
    The phone may be jailbroken if there is no lock passcode to prevent access. However, the phone can be completely erased and restored as new. In this case you will have no ability to locate it or prevent it from being jailbroken.
    What To Do If Your iDevice Is Lost Or Stolen
    If you activated Find My Phone before it was lost or stolen, you can track it only if Wi-Fi is enabled on the device. What you cannot do is track your device using a serial number or other identifying number. You cannot expect Apple or anyone else to find your device for you. You cannot recover your loss unless you insure your device for such loss. It is not covered by your warranty.
    If your iPhone, iPod, iPod Touch, or iPad is lost or stolen what do you do? There are things you should have done in advance - before you lost it or it was stolen - and some things to do after the fact. Here are some suggestions:
    This link, Re: Help! I misplaced / lost my iPhone 5 today morning in delta Chelsea hotel downtown an I am not able to track it. Please help!, has some good advice regarding your options when your iDevice is lost or stolen.
      1. Reporting a lost or stolen Apple product
      2. Find my lost iPod Touch
      3. AT&T. Sprint, and Verizon can block stolen phones/tablets
      4. What-To-Do-When-Iphone-Is-Stolen
      5. What to do if your iOS device is lost or stolen
      6. 6 Ways to Track and Recover Your Lost/Stolen iPhone
      7. Find My iPhone
      8. Report Stolen iPad | Stolen Lost Found Online
    It pays to be proactive by following the advice on using Find My Phone before you lose your device:
      1. Find My iPhone
      2. Setup your iDevice on iCloud
      3. OS X Lion/Mountain Lion- About Find My Mac
      4. How To Set Up Free Find Your iPhone (Even on Unsupported Devices)

  • I am using Acrobat XI Pro and tried to install the current update. I got this error message: "Error 1328.Error applying patch to file C:\Config.Msi\pT64b3.tmp It has probably been updated by other means1 and can no longer be modified by this patch. For mo

    I am using Acrobat XI Pro and tried to install the current update. I got this error message: "Error 1328.Error applying patch to file C:\Config.Msi\pT64b3.tmp It has probably been updated by other means1 and can no longer be modified by this patch. For more information contact your patch vendor." tried uninstalling and reinstalling and still get the error. Searched for C:\Config.Msi\pT64b3.tmp and cannot find the path or the file

    For AA XI, you only need the 11.0.09 patch. Download from http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=1&platform=Windows (Use "MAC" if a MAC is used).

  • The current user username has not been granted the ADVISOR privilege despite having it !

    Hi,
    I'm trying to follow ML note 2499931.1 'Using Dbms_Advisor.Tune_Mview To Optimize Materialized Views For Fast Refresh' and am receiving an error suggesting the user4 does Not have the Advisor privilege
    despite the fact that it does. What am I missing ?
    Every note I've found so far suggests granting the privilege is the fix.
    I have and continue to receive the error.
    Version 11.2.0.3 on Redhat 5
    select * from dba_sys_privs where grantee = 'SOAUSER';
    GRANTEE                        PRIVILEGE                                ADM
    SOAUSER                        CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW                 NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE VIEW                              NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM                    NO
    SOAUSER                        SELECT ANY DICTIONARY                    NO
    SOAUSER                        ON COMMIT REFRESH                        NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE ANY DIRECTORY                     NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE DATABASE LINK                     NO
    SOAUSER                        SELECT ANY TABLE                         NO
    SOAUSER                        ADVISOR                                  NO
    SOAUSER                        UNLIMITED TABLESPACE                     NO
    SOAUSER                        CREATE SESSION                           NO
    Error at line 2
    ORA-13616: The current user SOAUSER has not been granted the ADVISOR privilege.
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.PRVT_ADVISOR", line 4869
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ADVISOR", line 1969
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.PRVT_TUNE_MVIEW", line 490
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.PRVT_TUNE_MVIEW", line 970
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ADVISOR", line 739
    ORA-06512: at line 3
    Thanks in Advance
    Ken

    Sorry, but the code I was receiving the error message for is essentially   the same as the example in the note. Assumed people would have access to the note.
    The statement is:
    variable foo varchar2(20);
    declare foo varchar2(20) := 'ken_foo';
    begin
    dbms_advisor.tune_mview(:foo,
    'create materialized view ken_foo
    as
    select 
    papf.rowid R_papf,
    paaf.rowid R_paaf,
    gcc.rowid R_gcc,
    papf.employee_number,
    gcc.segment4 cost_center
    from hr.per_all_people_f@atc_pp_to_ebs_atcllc papf,
         hr.per_all_assignments_f@atc_pp_to_ebs_atcllc paaf,
         gl.gl_code_combinations@atc_pp_to_ebs_atcllc gcc
    where papf.person_id = paaf.person_id
    --and trunc(sysdate) between papf.effective_start_date and papf.effective_end_date
    --and trunc(sysdate) between paaf.effective_start_date and paaf.effective_end_date
    and paaf.default_code_comb_id = gcc.code_combination_id');
    end;
    Per another forum the answer appears to be that sys didn’t have the advisor privilege.
    Granted advisor to sys and ran the statement again as soauser and no error.
    Thanks
    Ken

  • Recently, when I upgraded to iOS8.2, my iPhone 5c has been switching itself off randomly even when the iPhone says it still has plenty of battery left. Has anyone else had this after upgrading?

    HI.
    a Couple of weeks ago I upgraded to iOS 8.2 on my iPhone 5c. However, recently it has been switching itself off at around 20-40% for no apparent reason and then goes to the plug iPhone in screen.
    please can someone help and let me know if they have had the same problem and how they resolved it
    thanks in advance

    This happens to me too. Went to the apple store and they check the battery life of my iphone. They took the iphone for 2 days and changed my battery for free. I hope this help you!

  • I am currently using the adobe cloud service and would like to give my granddaughter my original lightroom and photoshop programs.  Would do I need to do to remove them from my computer to hers?  The lightroom 5 program has been replaced with the cloud ve

    I am currently using the adobe cloud service and would like to give my granddaughter my original lightroom and photoshop programs.  Would do I need to do to remove them from my computer to hers?  The lightroom 5 program has been replaced with the cloud version on my computer.

    Follow the steps listed at  Transfer an Adobe product license
    Lightroom has no activation check so you don't need to do anything to your computer. Your old copy of Photoshop must be deactivated / uninstalled if you haven't already done so.

  • During the last week my Iphone has been switching off/on on its own and now my Iphone got stuck at the apple logo.What should I do?

    During the last week my Iphone has been switching off/on on its own and now my Iphone got stuck at the apple logo.What should I do?A month ago it also happened but then everything got back to normal.A person told me to change th display...what should i do?please help!

    Hey adinat,
    Welcome to Apple Support Communities! I would go through the steps in the iPhone troubleshooting assistant and see if that resolves the issue you're experiencing on your iPhone 5:
    Frozen or unresponsive iPhone
    http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/assistant/phone/
    Regards,
    David

  • The server principal "XYuser" is not able to access the database "Ydb" under the current security context

    SQL2005 on winserver 2003. I have a view in Xdb that accesses tables in 2 different databases (Xdb and Ydb) on the same server. I have mixed mode security. I have a SQL user (XYuser) that has read access to all tables and views on both databases, yet when I try to access the view using a C# windows application I get the following error:
    The server principal "XYuser" is not able to access the database "Ydb" under the current security context
    This same scenario works under SQL 2000. I looked through the postings and tried to set TRUSTWORTHY ON on both databases but that didn't help. I can access any other views or tables on the SQL 2005 server, just not the one that joins the tables cross databases. Any help is much appreciated... john

    This appears to be a Login/Database Mapping issue.  I was having this problem, but was able to resolve it as follows:
    Using the SQL Server management Studio:
    In the Object explorer, under the SERVER security folder (not the database security folder), expand Logins. 
    That is: ServerName -> Security -> Logins
    NOT: ServerName -> Databases -> DatabaseName -> Security -> Users
    Select the Login that is having the troubles.  Right click on the Login and select ‘Properties.’
    The ‘User Mapping’ page should list all databases on the server with a check mark on the databases that the Login has been mapped to.  When I was getting the error, the database in question was not checked (even though the Login was assigned as a User on the database itself).  Map the Login by checking the box next to the database name.  Set the default schema.  Then select the roles for the Login in the Database role membership list box.  I selected db_datareader and public.  After clicking OK to save the changes, the problem was resolved.
    In order to ‘Map’ the Login, the Login must not already be as User on the database, so you may have to go to the database security (ServerName -> Databases -> DatabaseName -> Security -> Users) and delete the Login from the list of database Users before mapping the Login to the database.

  • Note: Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time

    Dear all,
    sorry for opening another thread on this.
    I think I have a performance issue with workflows attached to document sets in SharePoint. And I say “I think” because people keep telling me that this is the way it just is.
    The user creates a new document set, which triggers a workflow in which the user has to confirm/review/approve a series of tasks. The time it takes from clicking the OK button on those task form to the workflow status moving to the next step is about 4 seconds.
    And visiting that status page within those 4 seconds brings up the infamous “Note: Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time.” message.
    Hitting Refresh in the browser after those 4 seconds will make the new workflow status appear and the red text go away.
    Is that normal? Is that the performance that everyone else is seeing as well?
    I struggle to see why simply moving a workflow from one task to another should take that on a machine that isn’t doing anything else at the time.
    (1)   
    I have a standalone (non-clustered) SharePoint box, 4 CPUs, 8 GB of memory, more than half of that available, acting as application server and wfe; only the database is on different box.
    (2)   
    The CPU only goes up to 18 or 19%, so CPU does not seem to be the bottleneck. Half the RAM is also still free.
    (3)   
    The workflow is designed with Nintex, and has about 9 flexi and review tasks – the last 2 of them in a loop iterating over typically 3 or 4 items.
    (4)   
    Looking at the logs it looks like the processing in Nintex only takes about 1 second – I don’t know where the other 3 seconds are going.
    (5)   
    There is nothing obvious in the logs.
    (6)   
    We’ve looked at all the “theoretical” improvements around throttling and batch sizes etc. – none of them appeared make any difference. And the workflow is so small that it looks like my tasks gets executed straight away. The problem appears
    to be that the execution takes too long(?) and therefore has not finished by the time the page get redrawn.
    (7)   
    I am running perfmon and I can e.g. see one(!) workflow being loaded into memory – as expected as I am the only user.
    (8)   
    I am seeing a total of 3(?) SQL queries being executed(?). I get the Bytes Sent/sec spiking at 25K, and Bytes received at 18K. But is this good or bad or a bottleneck?
    Where do I take it from here?
    I have been told that “[…] most customers have no issue with this as they are used to the way SP operates and it can be slow at times.” Is it really that bad?
    If it is worth watching more performance counters then I’d need to know what to compare them to.
    Is there something else I am missing?
    Thanks
    Martin

    Hi,
    Before considering an additional hardware try to change following configurations for workflow:
    Increase Throttle Size
    Increase Batch Size
    Time Out
    Workflow Timer Interval
    AutoCleanUpDays
    Increase Throttle Size
    The Workflow throttle setting controls how many Workflows can be processing at any one time on the entire server farm. By increasing the throttle it will allow the number of Workflows execution or can be initiated at a time.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Throttle Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowPostponeThreshold
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Throttle Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowPostponeThreshold 100
    Increase Batch Size
    This is the size that determines number of events processed for a single Workflow instance. Default value is 100, but it can be range from 1 to any number.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Batch Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowBatchSize
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Batch Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowBatchSize 200
    Time Out
    This decides the time out of the Workflow event. The default value is 5 and can be any integer. The time is in minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout -pv “15″
    Workflow Timer Interval
    This setting is applicable at Web Application level and not the farm level. The workflow timer interval specifies how often the workflow SPTimer job fires to process pending workflow tasks. This interval also represents the granularity of delay timers within
    your workflow. If a timer is set to delay for one minute, but the interval timer fires only every five minutes, the workflow delays for five minutes, not one minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn job-workflow -url <Web Application Url>
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn job-workflow -pv “Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30″ -url <Web Application Url>
    Here is the url for reference :
    http://praveenkasireddy.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/workflow-due-to-heavy-load-the-latest-workflow-operation-has-been-queued-it-will-attempt-to-resume-at-a-later-time/

  • Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time.

    I have SharePoint 2010 Enterprise running SP1. Configuration is one SharePoint server in the farm and a SQL 2008 R2 database for the backend. Our user environment is 80 users with very little load on the SharePoint server. I have the workflow timer
    set to 1 minute.
    I have a SPD workflow that starts manually on a form library. Whenever I publish a new version of the workflow, the next time I start the workflow it takes the full minute to finish. If I click on the workflow status before it finishes, I see the message
    "Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will
    attempt to resume at a later time.". After the minute completes the workflow finishes.
    Here's the weird thing, the next time I start the workflow, it runs in a couple of seconds - almost instantly. I've tried up to 15 times after the inital publishing and everything seems to work fine on initiation.
    Well, that would be fine for me, however, I intermintantly get this heavy load message during task processes that are running inside the workflow. It's probably less than 5% of the time. It's really frustrating though so I appreciate some help. I'm look
    online and haven't found anything that describes my situation.
    Thank you in advance!

    Hi,
    Before considering an additional hardware try to change following configurations for workflow:
    Increase Throttle Size
    Increase Batch Size
    Time Out
    Workflow Timer Interval
    AutoCleanUpDays
    Increase Throttle Size
    The Workflow throttle setting controls how many Workflows can be processing at any one time on the entire server farm. By increasing the throttle it will allow the number of Workflows execution or can be initiated at a time.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Throttle Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig |
    Select WorkflowPostponeThreshold
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Throttle Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowPostponeThreshold
    100
    Increase Batch Size
    This is the size that determines number of events processed for a single Workflow instance. Default value is 100, but it can be range from 1 to any number.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Batch Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig |
    Select WorkflowBatchSize
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Batch Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowBatchSize
    200
    Time Out
    This decides the time out of the Workflow event. The default value is 5 and can be any integer. The time is in minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout -pv “15″
    Workflow Timer Interval
    This setting is applicable at Web Application level and not the farm level. The workflow timer interval specifies how often the workflow SPTimer job fires to process pending workflow tasks. This interval also represents the granularity of delay timers within
    your workflow. If a timer is set to delay for one minute, but the interval timer fires only every five minutes, the workflow delays for five minutes, not one minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn job-workflow -url <Web Application Url>
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn job-workflow -pv “Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30″ -url <Web Application Url>
    Here is the url for reference :
    http://praveenkasireddy.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/workflow-due-to-heavy-load-the-latest-workflow-operation-has-been-queued-it-will-attempt-to-resume-at-a-later-time/

  • Is there an EASY way to submit podcasts to the itunes store? i've tried creating podcasts in garageband, then somewhere after wordpress  itunes  doesn't recognize the feed. my process has been (i am open to suggestions for other free and EASY services/me

    is there an EASY way to submit podcasts to the itunes store? i've tried creating podcasts in garageband, then somewhere after wordpress  itunes  doesn't recognize the feed.
    my process has been (i am open to suggestions for other free and EASY services/methods):
    garageband : create & edit audio. add 1400x1400 image.
    share to itunes.
    drag file to desktop.
    upload .m4a file to google drive.
    create a link post in wordpress using "podcast" tag & create "podcast" category.
    click on "entries rss" in wordpress, which takes me to the rss subscribe page (which is basically just my wordpress address with "/feed" at the end.
    i copy this url.
    go to itunes store > then "submit a podcast"
    itunes gives me the error message "we had difficulty downloading episodes from your feed."
    when i try to subscribe to my podcast in itunes, it does, but gives me no episodes available.
    i went back into wordpress and changed settings/ reading settings to : "full text" from "summary"
    still the same error message.
    i added a feedburner step after wordpress but got the same errors. i don't think i should have to add feedburner.
    wordpress seems to be encapsulating the rss, what am i doing wrong?
    this so much easier when you could go directly from garage band to iweb to mobileme; i miss those apple days (also idisk).

    if anyone has a super EASY process, i would LOVE to know what it is. EASY, meaning no html and also free. there are many free online storage systems available, many of which i currently use. the above process was just me trying to figure it out, if you have an easier method, please share. thank you so much!

  • ESE - Event Log Warning: 906 - A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file...

    Hello -
    We have 3 x EX2010 SP3 RU5 nodes in a cross-site DAG.
    Multi-role servers with 18 GB RAM [increased from 16 GB in an attempt to clear this warning without success].
    We run nightly backups on both nodes at the Primary Site.
    Node 1 backup covers all mailbox databases [active & passive].
    Node 2 backup covers the Public Folders database.
    The backups for each database are timed so they do not overlap.
    During each backup we get several of these event log warnings:
     Log Name:      Application
     Source:        ESE
     Date:          23/04/2014 00:47:22
     Event ID:      906
     Task Category: Performance
     Level:         Warning
     Keywords:      Classic
     User:          N/A
     Computer:      EX1.xxx.com
     Description:
     Information Store (5012) A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file.  This may result  in severe performance degradation.
     See help link for complete details of possible causes.
     Resident cache has fallen by 42523 buffers (or 27%) in the last 903 seconds.
     Current Total Percent Resident: 26% (110122 of 421303 buffers)
    We've rescheduled the backups and the warning message occurences just move with the backup schedules.
    We're not aware of perceived end-user performance degradation, overnight backups in this time zone coincide with the business day for mailbox users in SEA.
    I raised a call with the Microsoft Enterprise Support folks, they had a look at BPA output and from their diagnostics tool. We have enough RAM and no major issues detected.
    They suggested McAfee AV could be the root of our problems, but we have v8.8 with EX2010 exceptions configured.
    Backup software is Asigra V12.2 with latest hotfixes.
    We're trying to clear up these warnings as they're throwing SCOM alerts and making a mess of availability reporting.
    Any suggestions please?
    Thanks in advance

    Having said all that, a colleague has suggested we just limit the amount of RAM available for the EX2010 DB cache
    Then it won't have to start releasing RAM when the backup runs, and won't throw SCOM alerts
    This attribute should do it...
    msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832793.aspx
    Give me a shout if this is a bad idea
    Thanks

  • Cannot convert pdf to word - just spins and says retrievin current session status - has been doing it for days

    Cannot convert pdf to word - just spins and says retrievin current session status - has been doing it for days

    Hi da522811,
    Are you still having trouble converting files? It sounds as though you may be trying to convert via Reader, is that correct? If so, please try logging out, and then logging back in. You may need to log out via the web interface at https://cloud.acrobat.com if you don't have access to the Sign Out button in Reader.
    Please let us know how it goes.
    Best,
    Sara

  • A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file.

    Hi,
    We seem to get this error through SCOM every couple of weeks.  It doesn't correlate with the AV updates, so I'm not sure what's eating up the memory.  The server has been patched to the latest roll up and service pack.  The mailbox servers
    have been provisioned sufficiently with more than enough memory.  Currently they just slow down until the databases activate on another mailbox server.
    A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file.
    Any ideas?

    I've seen this with properly sized servers with very little Exchange load running. It could be a  number of different things.  Here are some items to check:
    Confirm that the server hardware has the latest BIOS, drivers, firmware, etc
    Confirm that the Windows OS is running the recommended hotfixes.  Here is an older post that might still apply to you
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/dblanch/archive/2012/02/27/a-few-hotfixes-to-consider.aspx
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2699780/en-us
    Setup a perfmon to capture data from the server. Look for disk performance, excessive paging, CPU/Processor spikes, and more.  Use the PAL tool to collect and analyze the perf data -
    http://pal.codeplex.com/
    Include looking for other applications or processes that might be consuming system resources (AV, Backup, security, etc)
    Be sure that the disk are properly aligned -
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/mikelag/archive/2011/02/09/how-fragmentation-on-incorrectly-formatted-ntfs-volumes-affects-exchange.aspx
    Check that the network is properly configured for Exchange server.  You might be surprise how the network config can cause perf & scom alerts.
    Make sure that you did not (improperly) statically set msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax and msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin attributes in Active Directory -
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832793(v=exchg.141).aspx
    Be sure that hyperthreading is NOT enabled -
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd346699(v=exchg.141).aspx#Hyper
    Check that there are no hardware issues on the server (RAM, CPU, etc).  You might need to run some vendor specific utilities/tools to validate.
    Proper paging file configuration should be considered for Exchange servers.  You can use the perfmon to see just how much paging is occurring.
    These will usually lead you in the right direction. Good Luck!

Maybe you are looking for