There is no key entry with such alias in keystore seeburger AS2

Hi,
Error message in RWB shows the following
Message entered module processor exit bean and will be transferred to JCA adapter
2011-04-06 06:19:29 Success SEEBURGER/AS2: Received order from system.
2011-04-06 06:19:29 Error Unable to forward message to JCA adapter. Reason: Fatal exception: com.sap.aii.af.ra.cci.XIRecoverableException: SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: There is no key entry with such alias in keystore, SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiExc
2011-04-06 06:19:29 Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection AS2_http://seeburger.com/xi failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Fatal exception: com.sap.aii.af.ra.cci.XIRecoverableException: SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: There is no key entry with such alias in keystore, SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.
2011-04-06 06:19:29 Error The message status set to NDLV.
2011-04-06 06:19:29 Error MP: Exception caught with cause javax.resource.ResourceException: Fatal exception: com.sap.aii.af.ra.cci.XIRecoverableException: SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: There is no key entry with such alias in keystore, SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.seeburger.ks
unable to send / receiver messages through AS2. Please let us know what could be the error. How/ where to resolve it.

Please check the SDN thread below
AS2 Adapter Configuration to Customer / no signature certificate
Also, check the help page below
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm40/helpdata/DE/84/be18d66b2a47f6b4adc704a7c0e23e/content.htm
for instructions on how to get the "SEEBURGER EDIINT AS2 Adapter for SAP Exchange Infrastructure Configuration Guide" from the Service Marketplace. Then, on this guide, please check the configuration according to your sender or receiver communication channel regarding the Security (certificates) parameters.
Are the key Store entries imported correctly? Please check if the certificates were imported in the right order and none of the certificates on the chain are expired.

Similar Messages

Error at AS2 adapter level...There is no certificate with such alias

Hi All,
Iam sending the 856 message through AS2 adapter to partner and i got the below error at the adapter level.
Unable to forward message to JCA adapter. Reason: Fatal exception: com.sap.aii.af.ra.cci.XIRecoverableException: SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: There is no certificate with such alias, SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: Th
Exception caught by adapter framework: Fatal exception: com.sap.aii.af.ra.cci.XIRecoverableException: SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: There is no certificate with such alias, SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # java.lang.Exception: AS2 message composition failed: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: Th
The certificate has already been uploaded and the AS2ID is defined as one of the identifiers of the party.
Anyone has any idea what might be wrong? Did i miss anything?
Waiting for your answers.
Regards
Lex

I am having the same issue.
I receive the com.seeburger.ksm.cryptoapi.exception.CryptoApiException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException
message plus the "unable to find alias name TRUSTED\".
It appears that after the outbound message is transformed to XML iin XI then sent to Seeburger's BIC for EDI format translation, then sent to AS2 for encryption/transmission, the AS2 adapter cannot find the key store that holds the certificates I am using.
Am I missing some configuration that points the to the keystore I need ?
Thanks for any and all responses.
Andy

Creating token key entry with SunPKCS11

Hi:
I have a problem creating a key entry in a smart card using PKCS11. I use a PKCS12 file as my input which is correctly loaded, I can parse the certificate chain. Then I try to load the key onto the card, but this fails in the C_CreateObject native method:
java.security.KeyStoreException: sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11Exception: CKR_DEVICE_MEMORY
        at sun.security.pkcs11.P11KeyStore.engineSetEntry(P11KeyStore.java:1104)
        at java.security.KeyStore.setEntry(Unknown Source)
        at com.safelayer.certmgr.Pkcs12Import.main(Pkcs12Import.java:88)
Caused by: sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11Exception: CKR_DEVICE_MEMORY
        at sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.C_CreateObject(Native Method)
        at sun.security.pkcs11.P11KeyStore.storePkey(P11KeyStore.java:1873)
        at sun.security.pkcs11.P11KeyStore.engineSetEntry(P11KeyStore.java:1100)
        ... 2 moreIt appears that I have correctly registered the provider and got the key store, but some permission is missing to create the object. I tried to add
attributes(*,*,*) = { CKA_TRUSTED = true }to the configuration, but no luck. How do I configure the provider such that I can manage certificates on the card?
Thanks, Erik

i came up with the same problem. Can you tell me your way to deal with it ?
thanks!
[email protected]

Error -RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE- There is already a line with the same key.

Hi,
While executing a report in BEx am faced with the error above. It ocurs when i take a drill down on Purchase order number field ( free charact). I tried by inserting this info-object into rows but still teh same error occurs and the connection with teh server is snapped.
The said field is also an user input field and the variable does not seem to the working as data other than the input values is fetched. There is a dump in ST22 with teh following error analysis-
You wanted to add an entry to table
"\FUNCTION-POOL=RRK0\FORM=EMPTY_COPY_DAT_N\DATA=<L_TSX_CSKID>[2
you declared
with a UNIQUE KEY. However, there was already an entry with the
same key.
This may have been in an INSERT or MOVE statement, or within a
SELECT ... INTO statement.
Plz guide
Regards,
Saurabh Diwakar

Hi,
take a look at this SAP note:
Term ITAB_DUPLICATE_KEY; SAPLRRK0; empty_copy_dat_n_01
SAP Note Number: [966238 |https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes/sdn_oss_bw_bex/~form/handler%7b5f4150503d3030323030363832353030303030303031393732265f4556454e543d444953504c4159265f4e4e554d3d393636323338%7d]
Regards
Andreas

Problem managing keys/certificates with SunPKCS11

Hi:
I am trying to create a small applet to manage certificates stored on a smart card using SunPKCS11. I can successfully import a key/certificate from a P12 file, however I have some problems managing keys and certificates that appears to be related.
First, creating a KeyStore entry creates one object with one alias. But reading the card from another application such as safesign, I see a public object with the chosen alias but the private key appears with no alias specified. if I import the whole certificate chain, only the certificate will have the chosen alias the others will have no defined alias.
Everything works ok, I can sign with the certificate on the card. But managing certificates and keys becomes incompatible with other applications, if multiple keys . Is there some way I can specify the alias so it will show for the private object?
Secondly, I cannot get the installed certificate from my java application without authenticating. Other applications can read the certificate, authentication is required only to access the private object.
I see further that if I delete the private object with safesign but let the certificates remain, I no longer get any certificates or keys when listing from SunPKCS11, while safesign still lists the certificates. Also, I can't access the card read only to list certificates.
I think these things are related: SunPKCS11 creates and sees only one object which is protected if it has been created with SetKeyEntry.
Is there any way to gain more fine grained control over the key store with SunPKCS11?
Thanks, Erik

i came up with the same problem. Can you tell me your way to deal with it ?
thanks!
[email protected]

Different passwords for KeyStore and Key entry

I am having trouble using a keystore whose entries have passwords that are different from both each other, and the keystore itself. I have managed to get this (differing storepass, and keypass) working for the case of a single entry, but this case is pointless since it is the same as having a new keystore for each user. It also works fine in the case that multiple key entries share a password that is different from the keystore. However, when I place a new key entry with a different password into the keystore I get an UnrecoverableKeyException upon initialization of the KeyManagerFactory.
There seems to be some sort of restriction that the key entries should all share the same password.
I have found several articles and texts that touch on this, but the details are fuzzy. Has anyone else ever tried to do this? Will you offer some insight? When multiple users have access to the same machine should they share a keystore, or is keeping a separate keystore file for each user the standard?
Thank you for any assistance.

Pankaj,
Thank you for your reply. I also have not seen the problems when manipulating the keys with keytool. However, when selecting a key through the KeyManager I get problems.
I have wrapped the default KeyManager with another KeyManager which captures the calls to chooseClientAlias, and getPrivateKey so that I may use the key's password rather than the one that was used to load the keystore. The problem seems to arise before this.
I get an UnrecoverableKeyException at the time that the KeyManagerFactory is initialized. I don't know what the KeyManagerFactory initialization method is doing with the password. Do you know where I might find the code for this? My debugger just gives me function defs. I think that I need to supply a custom KMF, but it would be nice to know what the default one is doing first.
I noticed that you have authored a book on j2ee security. Does it cover this?
Ethan

Transporting table entry with primary key 120 char

Hi all,
I have 2 separate questions which I feel are closely related.
In the url:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/21eb6e446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
It says:....
If the key length is greater than 120, there are restrictions when transporting table entries. The key can only be specified up to a maximum of 120 places in a transport. If the key is larger than 120, table entries must be transported generically.
How do I transport the table entries "generically" for such a table?
To further illustrate my actual problem:
My problem in the real world lies with the MIMETYPES table, maintained in trx SMW0.
I select the mime types row by row and do a Table Entry > Transport Entries, but get an error that says
"Key entry for table MIMETYPES may only be generic".
As a result it fails to attach to my transport.
(Note: the primary key of MIMETYPES is 128 chars long)
The Diagnosis long text says "The key is longer than allowed by the Change and Transport System (120 characters)."
The Procedure says:
1. Make sure that you only specify the character fields before the
 first non-character key field. You must enter the key with a generic
 ending. Enter the generic symbol directly after the specified part
 of the key.
2. You must enter the generic symbol at the latest in the 120th
 character of the key. 
What is this generic symbol that i need to insert at the 120th position??
Message was edited by:
 Kevin Wong
Message was edited by:
 Kevin Wong
Message was edited by:
 Kevin Wong

Thanks Nick!
So the mysterious "generic character" is actually the asterisk (*). It works.
Strange tho as the error long text says to insert the "generic character" at the 120th character position of the key, but I found that altho I can save it, the transport still fails with the same error.
I tried placing the * right after the key value e.g.
KEY123*
and it worked.
Thanks again!

No identity key/certificate entry was found under alias test keystore

I created a keystore using the command
keytool -genkey -alias test-keystore c:\TestKeyStore\test1
Then imported certificates which i downloaded from the targets website
keytool -import -alias itestcomodo -keystore c:\TestKeyStore\test1.jks -trustcacerts -file (.cer file name)
keytool -import -alias TestEXternalCARoot -keystore c:\TestKeyStore\test1.jks -trustcacerts -file (.cer file name)
keytool -import -alias TestPrimaryIntermediate -keystore c:\TestKeyStore\test1.jks -trustcacerts -file (.cer file name)
keytool -import -alias TestSecondaryIntermediate -keystore c:\TestKeyStore\test1.jks -trustcacerts -file (.cer file name)
Then I added the certificates to the java cacert file and to oracle weblogic cacaert file
C:\oracle\Middleware\wlserver_10.3\server\lib\cacerts
I setup under weblogic admin console
Keystore type as Custome identity and Java Standard keystore and included test1.jks with the passphrase.
Similarly I configured the ssl tab but I am geting the following alert on weblogic console
<Jan 25, 2012 1:12:43 PM EST> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090171> <Loading the iden
tity certificate and private key stored under the alias test from the JKS
keystore file c:\TestKeyStore\test1.jks
<Jan 25, 2012 1:12:43 PM EST> <Alert> <Security> <BEA-090168> <No identity key/c
ertificate entry was found under alias test in keystore c:\TestKeyStore\test1.jks
After this going down i get SSL Handshake error saying The security certificate recieved from (the target website) was not
signed properly.
Please help.
Thanks,

you can learn few basics from below link :
http://www.weblogic-tips.com/2008/07/27/how-to-configure-self-sign-certificate-on-weblogic-server/
http://www.weblogic-tips.com/2008/07/27/configuring-commercial-certificates-on-weblogic-server/
http://www.weblogic-tips.com/2008/07/27/steps-to-create-self-sign-certificates-for-weblogic-server/
In simple words , I would say that Private key and Public key exist in pair . Private key in case of weblogic server is used for encrypting the data and public key is used for decrypting the data which is a mandatory step in SSL handshake .
You can learn process of Handshake for below link which is very important to learn SSL .
http://www.weblogic-tips.com/2010/05/20/two-way-ssl-on-weblogic-server/
Thanks,
Sandeep
Edited by: sandeep_singh on Jan 26, 2012 10:04 PM

RGDIR already contains an entry with the same logical key

Hi Gurus,
We are getting the error"RGDIR already contains an entry with the same logical key" when we re-run the payroll in ECC 5.0
Is this a Standard bug in the Payroll program or else configuration error .
Found some note :776262 related to the same error in 4.0 to 4.7.But not for ECC 5.0.
Let me know if there are any support packs available...
Best Regards,
Srikanth

Hello Srikanth,
Regarding your description, it seems there is an inconsistence in the payroll results.
To analyze the exact problem in the cluster of this employee, You can run the report RPUDIR00.
Additionally, you can make a test using the standard payroll schema, to see if you get the same error message.
Kind regards,
Graziela Dondoni

Select For all entries with multiple keys

Dear Developers,
im writing a program which reads the last the last mseg entry with bwart 101 and bwart 201 an writes it into different fields of a table. In dependance of the bwart the max-value of mkpf-budat should be moved into field wedat or wadat.
At the moment i use this coding:
loop at gt_daten assigning <fs_daten>.
 select distinct max( budat ) from wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2 into <fs_daten>-wedat
 where matnr_i = <fs_daten>-matnr
 and werks_i = <fs_daten>-werks
 and lgort_i = <fs_daten>-lgort
 and bwart_i = '101'.
 select distinct max( budat ) from wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2 into <fs_daten>-wadat
 where matnr_i = <fs_daten>-matnr
 and werks_i = <fs_daten>-werks
 and lgort_i = <fs_daten>-lgort
 and bwart_i = '201'.
endloop.
wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2 is a view combining mkpf an mseg by primary keys.
Searching the internet i read, using FOR ALL ENTRIES should be prefered to selectstatements in loops.
So i tried:
*selectstatement
select budat matnr_i werks_i lgort_i bwart_i from wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2 into table lt_mseg for all entries in gt_daten
 where matnr_i = gt_daten-matnr
 and werks_i = gt_daten-werks
 and lgort_i = gt_daten-lgort
 and ( bwart_i = '101' or bwart_i = '201' )
*Substitute the MAX( )-Function
sort lt_mseg descending by matnr werks lgort bwart budat.
delete adjacent duplicates from lt_mseg comparing matnr werks lgort bwart.
*Differ between wedat and wadat
loop at gt_daten assigning <fs_daten>.
 loop at lt_mseg assigning <fs_mseg>
 where matnr = <fs_daten>-matnr
 and werks = <fs_daten>-werks
 and lgort = <fs_daten>-lgort.
 case <fs_mseg>-bwart.
 when '101'.
 <fs_daten>-wedat = <fs_mseg>-budat.
 when '201'.
 <fs_daten>-wadat = <fs_mseg>-budat.
 endcase.
 endloop.
Even in the dev-system this takes twice the time of the "nested" selects.
Imho this is because of the internal OR interpretation of the FOR ALL ENTRIES-statement and the size of the result.
Can somebody give me a hint, how to tune this code?
Select Inner join should be difficult because the target field differs, dependent of the value in bwart...
Thanks in advance!

I understand that you are trying to capture the maximum value of posting date MKPF-BUDAT for movement types 101 and 201 for each combination of material, plant and storage location.
Few things, that makes the below coding more efficient at both application and database level and I confirmed this on an IDES sandbox
1. Along with MKPF and MSEG, there is another table WBGT, in the view WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG join and also WBGT has select condition restrictions imposed on its fields. So if this restriction impacts your selection you may want to do a INNER JOIN of MSEG with MKPF only (with MSEG as leading table, as it has an active secondary index with MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART ) and also there won't be overhead from the unnecessary join with WBGT table whose fields you are not using.
2. The below SORT on lt_mseg will ensure that the record having greatest BUDAT will be at the top of all rows (least index) for each combination of MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART.
3. DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES will ensure that only the top row (having greatest BUDAT) remains in the table lt_mseg for each combination of MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART. This will ensure that subsequent READs with BINARY SEARCH will always and efficiently read the row with maximum value of BUDAT for each unique combination of MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART.
4. The below logic will require more memory (even though it is more efficient performance wise) compared to direct SELECT with MAX for each MATNR, WERKS, LGORT and BWART in a LOOP the way you were doing before. So if the size of lt_mseg is causing memory issues, your logic with aggregate function MAX at database level will be your only option.
So, I propose you revise your coding like below for most optimal results
CHECK NOT gt_daten[] IS INITIAL.
*selectstatement
*SELECT budat matnr_i werks_i lgort_i bwart_i
* FROM wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2
* INTO TABLE lt_mseg
* FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_daten
* WHERE matnr_i = gt_daten-matnr
* AND werks_i = gt_daten-werks
* AND lgort_i = gt_daten-lgort
* AND ( bwart_i = '101' OR bwart_i = '201' ).
* The below SELECT is more economical than the one commented above
SELECT mkpf~budat mseg~matnr mseg~werks mseg~lgort mseg~bwart
FROM mseg INNER JOIN mkpf
 ON mseg~mblnr = mkpf~mblnr AND
 mseg~mjahr = mkpf~mjahr
 INTO TABLE lt_mseg
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_daten
 WHERE mseg~matnr = gt_daten-matnr
 AND mseg~werks = gt_daten-werks
 AND mseg~lgort = gt_daten-lgort
 AND ( mseg~bwart = '101' OR mseg~bwart = '201' ).
*Substitute the MAX( )-Function
SORT lt_mseg BY matnr werks lgort bwart DESCENDING budat.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM lt_mseg COMPARING matnr werks lgort bwart.
*Differ between wedat and wadat
LOOP AT gt_daten ASSIGNING <fs_daten>.
READ TABLE lt_mseg ASSIGNING <fs_mseg>
 WITH KEY matnr = <fs_daten>-matnr
 werks = <fs_daten>-werks
 lgort = <fs_daten>-lgort
 bwart = '101' BINARY SEARCH.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
 <fs_daten>-wedat = <fs_mseg>-budat.
ENDIF.
READ TABLE lt_mseg ASSIGNING <fs_mseg>
 WITH KEY matnr = <fs_daten>-matnr
 werks = <fs_daten>-werks
 lgort = <fs_daten>-lgort
 bwart = '201' BINARY SEARCH.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
 <fs_daten>-wadat = <fs_mseg>-budat.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.

Web Matrix FTP Remote Connection Error - "Connection Error - Failure to get file list from server. An entry with the same key already exists."

Does anyone have experience with this issue when connecting to a Linux FTP Web Server running a FTP Site?
"Connection Error - Failure to get file list from server. An entry with the same key already exists."
I cannot access the root directory of the ftp file server using Web Matrix 3. The site is .php based, and
is accessible when connecting with FileZilla or Remote Connecting via FTP with Visual Studio.
All sites have been deleted from Web Matrix, the user Application Data has been cleared and Web Matrix has been reinstalled.
Issue Persists....
Thanks in advance,
Justin

Turns out that the program leaves metadata in your app data folder that is not removed upon uninstallation of the software.
This is incorporated to communicate with a file that uploaded into the ftp directory when publishing pages.

Im about to buy a macbook pro. but I dont know if there are too much techproblems with the retina model,such as overheating, malfunction of the fans, screen problems?. or is the macbook pro non retina in tech problems a better option? thanxa lot

Im about to buy a macbook pro. but I dont know if there are too much techproblems with the retina model,such as overheating, malfunction of the fans, screen problems?. or is the macbook pro non retina in tech problems a better option? thanxa lot

I have a brand new rMBP and have not seen any of those problems.

Iphoto 9.5.1 will not import videos with .mpg extension from my pictures folder and keep getting a OSStatus error-54. Is there a way I can import such videos to the iphone library?

iphoto 9.5.1 will not import videos with .mpg extension from my pictures folder and keep getting a OSStatus error-54. Is there a way I can import such videos to the iphone library? Pls help.

This is what that error means:
-54
permErr
Software lock on file; Not a subscriber [permissions error on file open]
Download and launch BatChmod. Put the videos into a subfolder and drag that folder containing the video files into the Batchmod window. Make sure you are the owner and have R,W, X access as well as the group. Everyone will have R only.
Check the Change ownership and privileges, Unlock and Apply to enclosed boxes and then click on the Apply button. When done try importing the files again.
OT

Query 0: Runtime error There is already a line with the same key. with para

Dear all,
I have a query with several variables. One of the variables is Version. When I use certain values e.g. 1,2 or 3, I can generate the query without any problem. However, when I use the other values e,g, 4, 5, or 6, the query gives me with the following error messages :
1. Query 0: Runtime error There is already a line with the same key. with parallel processing via RFC
2. Error while reading data; navigation is possible
3. >> Row: 174 Inc: LRSDRPU02 Prog: SAPLRSDRP
Error 1
Query 0: Runtime error There is already a line with the same key. with parallel processing via RFC
Message no. DBMAN428
Error 2
Error while reading data; navigation is possible
Message no. BRAIN289
Diagnosis
An error occurred while reading the data. The query result is therefore empty or inconsistent and is not buffered in the OLAP cache.
Procedure
You can continue to navigate or return to the last navigation step.
Error 3
>> Row: 174 Inc: LRSDRPU02 Prog: SAPLRSDRP
Message no. RS_EXCEPTION301
Diagnosis
En error has been triggered. This message specifies where in the coding the error occurred. This helps you to localize the error quickly.
May I know what causes this error and how to troubleshoot it?
Thank you.

Venkat,
You are either a genius or working for SAP.
In any case, your solution solved my problem.
Thanks heaps!

F110- not able to clear the debit and credit entry with the same reference

Hi,
I am not able to clear the debit and credit entry with the same reference in F110 even after having the payment terms as immediate payment, payment method is maintained in document no and vendor master data. Both debit and credit entry is appearing in FBL1N as an open item but it is not appearing in F110.
In Log message appear as 8 days grace period is existing whereas as payment term is just 0001- immediate payment.
Kindly advice me what could be wrong.
Thanks,
Manya.

Hi,
Credit and debit balance in vendor account are not cleared automatically when only vendor line item has payment method and credit memo has not payment method. Also when there is not payment method maintained in vendor master data.
In such case to avoid payment to vendor when vendor has debit balance we perform debit balance check.
In second scenario when u2018individual paymentu2019 is selected in vendor master data vendor invoice and credit memo are not cleared automatically in F110.
To setoff vendor credit and debit balance in F110 you to uncheck u2018individual paymentu2019 check in vendor master data > company code data > payment data.
Thanks!
Raju

There is no key entry with such alias in keystore seeburger AS2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for