Thumbnails in the browser 3.3 is smaller than the previous version
thumbnails in the browser 3.3 is smaller than the previous version.
I did this, the difference is very small. for some reason the size of thumbnails was limited in the browser. in split view window if you increase the thumbs are larger. I'll try to photograph the screen to show the difference. excuse my google translator
Similar Messages
-
ORA-13044: the specified tile size is smaller than the tolerance
Hi,
I get the oracle error ORA-13044: the specified tile size is smaller than the tolerance when I do the following point cloud clip:
8 sdo_geometry(2003,29903, null,
9 mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,3),
10 mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(316504,316510,234084,234090)),
However the bounds of my point cloud are
316500 to 316511 and 234080 to 234092 and my tolerance during point cloud creation is set to 0.000015 (I have alterated this value before to make it smaller but nothing seems fit).
Where do I set the "tile size"?
The set consists of 100 points and blk_capacity is set to 50.
Any help is really greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
F.Hi BKazar,
thanks for responding.
Yes, I tried out all sorts of things and swapped the numbers to see if that would fix the issue. It did not.
I have found out now though what the issue was. When I loaded the data file into Oracle, the guy who gave me the file said that the first column is the longitude, but it wasn't. After switching sdo_point.x and y the error disappeard.
I suppose the sdo_srid was expecting a different range and got confused because my long and lat were swapped.
Cheers,
F. -
I have called support on my actual printer and everything is fine, they suggested to contact the browser I am printing from. Microsoft word and other software prints normal. Any web page I attempt to print from, even when I select the "print page" option, I have this error. I have been through all the troubleshooting to reset defaults.
Does the issue still occur if you start Firefox in Safe Mode? http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode
How about with a new, empty profile? http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Basic%20Troubleshooting#w_8-make-a-new-profile
What steps have you tried?
What is the printer model? What driver/version are you running? -
Hi All ~ Thanks in advance for your help!
I have been on a support chat with Adobe for 2 hours now and they can't figure this out but hopefully one of you can!
I exported my files as a LightRoom Catalog
I zipped the catalog and the smart previews together
I sent the zipped folder via Dropbox to a photo editor
Editor edited the photos
Editor exported the files as a Lightroom Catalog and zipped them
Editor sent the LR Catalog back to me via Dropbox
I opened the Lightroom Catalog in LR (the pixel dimensions are the same as the originals)
I exported the photos as DNG's (which does not allow for any file size changes - I also tried JPGs and the same thing happened)
Camera Raw 7.1 and later (I tried them all just to see - and they all rendered the same result)
Embed Fast Load Data (checked on)
Embed Original Raw File (check on)
I checked the Pixel dimensions on my exported photos and they are smaller
The original pixel dimensions are:
4912x7360 and the new size (after exporting) is: 1709x2560
But here's the real kicker! WHEN I UPLOAD A PHOTO TO LIGHTROOM FROM MY COMPUTER DIRECTLY (not from a LR catalog), AND EXPORT THAT FILE, IT EXPORTS AT FULL SIZE with no change in the pixels dimensions!Hi All ~ Thanks in advance for your help!
I have been on a support chat with Adobe for 2 hours now and they can't figure this out but hopefully one of you can!
I exported my files as a LightRoom Catalog
I zipped the catalog and the smart previews together
I sent the zipped folder via Dropbox to a photo editor
Editor edited the photos
Editor exported the files as a Lightroom Catalog and zipped them
Editor sent the LR Catalog back to me via Dropbox
I opened the Lightroom Catalog in LR (the pixel dimensions are the same as the originals)
I exported the photos as DNG's (which does not allow for any file size changes - I also tried JPGs and the same thing happened)
Camera Raw 7.1 and later (I tried them all just to see - and they all rendered the same result)
Embed Fast Load Data (checked on)
Embed Original Raw File (check on)
I checked the Pixel dimensions on my exported photos and they are smaller
The original pixel dimensions are:
4912x7360 and the new size (after exporting) is: 1709x2560
But here's the real kicker! WHEN I UPLOAD A PHOTO TO LIGHTROOM FROM MY COMPUTER DIRECTLY (not from a LR catalog), AND EXPORT THAT FILE, IT EXPORTS AT FULL SIZE with no change in the pixels dimensions! -
I just got a new printer...Epson R3000...but have had this problem before. It's probably a simple fix, but I can't figure it out. I'm asking for printing on 8.5 x 11 and the image comes out 6.5 x 9.5 every time. Help please! And thanks!
The Epson site stated that the R3000 printer can print borderless however the quality will suffer in the expanded print area. Borderless is not supported on some heavy paper. To me the means your better off limiting you images size to the standard print area. There will be magins about 1/8" on the four sides so the print area on 8.5"x11" paper is 8.26" x 10.76"....
Take note of the print size set by the epson driver it may change depending on the paper type set. Note my first epson 4800 setup where I set 8.5" x 11" sheet paper from tray into the printer setting the driver set a smaller size for the paper which was reflected into the Photoshop Print preview. It shows paper is 8.499" x 10.999 with a small unprintable area across the top....
Paper
Use paper under normal conditions:
Temperature: 59 to 77 °F (15 to 25 °C)
Humidity: 40 to 60% RH
Note:
Since the quality of any particular brand or type of paper may be changed by the manufacturer at any time, Epson cannot guarantee the quality of any non-Epson brand or type of paper. Always test a sample of paper stock before purchasing large quantities or printing large jobs.
Single-sheets
Size
A4 (8.3 × 11.7 inches)
A6 (4.1 × 5.8 inches)
Letter (8.5 × 11 inches)
Legal (8.5 × 14 inches)
4 × 6 inches
5 × 7 inches
8 × 10 inches
11 × 14 inches
12 × 12 inches
Half Letter (5.5 × 8.5 inches)
B (11 × 17 inches)
A3 (11.7 × 16.5 inches)
Super B (13 × 19 inches)
Paper types
Plain paper
Special papers distributed by Epson
Thickness
0.003 to 0.004 inch (0.08 to 0.11 mm) in the sheet feeder
0.012 to 0.051 inch (0.3 to 1.3 mm) in the manual feed tray
Weight
17 lb (64 g/m2) to 24 lb (90 g/m2)
Printable Area
Note:
When printing borderless, quality may decline in the expanded printable area. Borderless printing is not supported with poster board.
Sheets
Top: 0.12 inch (3 mm) minimum
Left: 0.12 inch (3 mm) minimum
Right: 0.12 inch (3 mm) minimum
Bottom: 0.12 inch (3 mm) minimum
Roll Paper
Standard margins
Borderless printing margins
CD/DVDs
Caution:
Avoid printing in the clear plastic areas of your discs to prevent staining the disc with ink. -
Why is the Log Area size much smaller than the log volume
I have been following up on an Early Watch report that has been generated for our production SCM 5.0 system running liveCache 7.6.02 Build 14. The alert says "The LOG volumes size in your system is too small. Recommendation: Configure LOG Volumes to at least 2 GB". There are two interesting things about this.
1) I have spent the last couple of days reading all the OSS Notes, and MaxDB documentation I could find, and this does not seem to be documented as a recommendation anywhere. Does this seem like a realistic recommendation without taking into account the level of change actifity?
2) There is a single log volume allocated with size 2,097,160 KB. In production LC10 and DBMGUI report this to be correct size under volume details, but only list the total log area size as 1,706,328 (81% of the volume size). We have a non-production environment with exactly the same size log volume, but it reports that the log area size is 2,032,008 KB (97% of the volume). What leads to these different amounts of wasted space, and is there any way of getting the database to start using it?
Thanks,
MarkHi Natalia,
I did read 869267, several times. It does not answer my questions which is why I posted here.
DBMGUI version = 7.6.00.25
DBMCLI commands for PL1 (Production)
> xinstinfo PL1
IndepData : /sapdb/data
IndepPrograms : /sapdb/programs
InstallationPath : /sapdb/PL1/db
Kernelversion : KERNEL 7.6.02 BUILD 014-123-152-175
Rundirectory : /sapdb/data/wrk/PL1
> dbmcli -d PL1 -u control,control
dbmcli on PL1>db_state
OK
State
ONLINE
dbmcli on PL1>info log
OK
END
Name | Value
Log Mirrored = NO
Log Writing = ON
Log Automatic Overwrite = OFF
Max. Size (KB) = 1706328
Backup Segment Size (KB) = 699048
Used Size (KB) = 104640
Used Size (%) = 6
Not Saved (KB) = 104640
Not Saved (%) = 6
Log Since Last Data Backup (KB) = 0
Savepoints = 5210
Checkpoints = 0
Physical Reads = 2469115
Physical Writes = 15655616
Queue Size (KB) = 48000
Queue Overflows = 646
Group Commits = 98205
Waits for Logwriter = 10957511
Max. Waits = 10
Average Waits = 0
OMS Log Used Pages = 0
OMS Min. Free Pages = 0
dbmcli on PL1>param_getvolsall
OK
LOG_MIRRORED NO
MAXLOGVOLUMES 2
MAXDATAVOLUMES 14
LOG_VOLUME_NAME_001 262145 F /sapdb/PL1/saplog/DISKL001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0001 524289 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0002 524289 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0002
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0003 524289 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0003
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0004 524289 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0004
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0005 524289 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0005
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0006 524289 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0006
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0007 524289 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0007
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0008 524289 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0008
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0009 1048577 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0009
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0010 1048577 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0010
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0011 1048577 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0011
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0012 1048577 F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0012
dbmcli on PL1>param_directget MAXCPU
OK
MAXCPU 12
dbmcli on PL1>param_directget MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT
OK
MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT 0
dbmcli on PL1>param_directget LOG_IO_QUEUE
OK
LOG_IO_QUEUE 6000
> xinstinfo SL1
IndepData : /sapdb/data
IndepPrograms : /sapdb/programs
InstallationPath : /sapdb/SL1/db
Kernelversion : KERNEL 7.6.02 BUILD 014-123-152-175
Rundirectory : /sapdb/data/wrk/SL1
dbmcli on SL1>db_state
OK
State
ONLINE
dbmcli on SL1>info log
OK
END
Name | Value
Log Mirrored = NO
Log Writing = ON
Log Automatic Overwrite = OFF
Max. Size (KB) = 2032008
Backup Segment Size (KB) = 699048
Used Size (KB) = 3824
Used Size (%) = 0
Not Saved (KB) = 3824
Not Saved (%) = 0
Log Since Last Data Backup (KB) = 0
Savepoints = 1256
Checkpoints = 0
Physical Reads = 2178269
Physical Writes = 4969914
Queue Size (KB) = 16000
Queue Overflows = 21201
Group Commits = 643
Waits for Logwriter = 751336
Max. Waits = 4
Average Waits = 0
OMS Log Used Pages = 0
OMS Min. Free Pages = 0
dbmcli on SL1>param_getvolsall
OK
LOG_MIRRORED NO
MAXLOGVOLUMES 2
MAXDATAVOLUMES 10
LOG_VOLUME_NAME_001 262145 F /sapdb/SL1/saplog/DISKL001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0001 262145 F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata1/DISKD0001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0002 262145 F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata2/DISKD0002
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0003 1048577 F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata3/DISKD0003
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0004 1048577 F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata4/DISKD0004
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0005 783501 F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata1/DISKD0005
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0006 783501 F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata2/DISKD0006
dbmcli on SL1>param_directget MAXCPU
OK
MAXCPU 4
dbmcli on SL1>param_directget MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT
OK
MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT 0
dbmcli on SL1>param_directget LOG_IO_QUEUE
OK
LOG_IO_QUEUE 2000
Thanks for the explaination of the reserved space for the Log Queue pages. This does explain why there is the difference between the two. I think we probably have our log segment size too large. As you can see we do get occasional log queue overflows. Do you suggest we increase the size of our log IO queue higher, and allocate more log volume space to compensate?
select * from SYSINFO.LOGSTATISTICS (on PL1)
1706328;334176;19;334176;19;1879;20305192;64109066;7806480;182151514;12;48000
DBMGUI Log Area Usage
Total Size: 2048.01 MB
Free Log Area: 1330.38 MB
Used Log Area: 335.96 MB
Unsaved Log Area: 335.96
Log since Last Data Backup: 0.00 MB
Thanks,
Mark -
Hey gang,
iphoto folder became big so I have moved it to an external drive. I made sure the external disk is not excluded from timemachine backup in tm preferences. Backup seemed to take forever (it actually said "preparing for backup" the whole time with a spinning progress bar) ie 24 hours and still the same pogress bar.
i stopped the process as i had no confidence anything was actually happening
When i open up time machine, an earlier version of my imac is there, but the external drive is kind of greyed and i cannot access it.
When I check the sparse bundle size, it is under 200 gb, when my imac is around 600 gb, 900 with the external drive.
Why is the sparse bundle so small relative to the imac? are there hidden data files outside of the sparse bundle? when checking the preferences, it states total included is 921 gb...yet that is not reflected in the sparse bundle size.
I want to be sure iphoto is actually backed up before deleting it from my imac.
thanks anyone!marten berkman wrote:
I am wondering whether the "processing" progress bar was due to the time capsule freeing up space for the additional data on the new external drive. When I cancelled it, available space on the tc incresed from 200 to 500 gb.
Yes, quite possibly. Especially on Leopard and Snow Leopard, that process on network backups is excruciatingly repetitive and slow. It's improved greatly in Lion and later, but still isn't exactly quick.
The backup complete, i checked the contents of the backed up version of the external drive, and the iphoto folder was the same size as original, so I have confidence that iphoto is backed up. Now I could delete the iphoto from the imac, freeing up tons of space.
Yay!
Still curious why the imac sparsebundle is only 160gb, while my macbook pro sparsebundle is about 700 gb...as though they are inversely named from the computers they back up.
Oh, I didn't realize you had two Macs backing-up to the TC. Which one is the external HD connected to?
Unless you've specifically excluded things, after the initial backup, the sparse bundle should be nearly the size of the data it's backing-up (TM does exclude some things like system work files, most caches and logs, and trash, so the backups are a few GBs smaller). As you do more backups, of course, it will grow.
So please clarify how much data is on each drive, Mac, and sparse bundle.
Also, the 2tb time capsule has 258 gb of 1.8 tb available....am I to suppose that there is hidden backup data not in the sparse bundles?
Sparse bundles are odd critters. They don't automatically shrink when things are deleted from them. Instead, the vacated space is used for new files until it's full, then it begins to grow again. Time Machine will "compact" them when necessary, to reclaim the empty space, but doesn't take the time to do it unless it's out of room.
You can do that manually if you want, per the pink box in Time Machine - Frequently Asked Question #12.
Message was edited by: Pondini -
The exported mbox is way smaller than the original?
Hi,
I have a local mail account where the mbox comes in at 1,5GB. When I use the export to mbox function the resulting mbox is only 850MB. I have used the "permanently purge deleted mails" option but that didn't change anything about thos 1,5GB. Should I be concerned that half my mails are missing from my new backup?
Thanks a lot.You might have accidentally "zoomed" the site (zoom works both to make the font larger and smaller). Try resetting the zoom level first before moving into the font settings. You can do that by pressing '''Ctrl+0''' (''that's a zero'') when you're on the problem site.
This article has more information: [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/how-do-i-use-zoom How do I use Zoom? | How to | Firefox Help]
Any luck? -
Dear Community,
I'm synchronising my T3 with two PCs. One with Vista & Outlook 2007 and the other with XP & Outlook 2003. Both with the latest conduit & Hotsync Manager versions installed for each OS based on the availability on the Palm Website.
My problem is that when I synchronise the T3 with either PC and then try to sync it with the other I'm receiving the following error message for the Calendar:
Outlook Calendar
The passed buffer is too small for the reply data.
OLERR:0D-0008
OLERR:0D-0004
OLERR:0D-0001
- Slow Sync
Outlook Calendar synchronization failed
The second time the sync is successful but takes a long time and the actual problem is that it creates duplicates for records previously changed on either PC - but with a sync in between those changes, i.e. no conflict in the sense that the same record was changed in both environments since the last sync. I have configured the conflict handling to establish a hierarchy PC1-T3-PC2 but try to avoid them by synchronising as often as possible.
Has anyone come across that problem or any ideas? Can you somehow adjust the buffer size for the sync? I have been using Lotus Organiser & then the various Outlook versions for a number of years.
Thank you
Rainer
Post relates to: Tungsten T3
Post relates to: Tungsten T3As they say on TV, "Doh"!!!
I figured out the problem. I started the Sync tool, selected "Settings", then "Mcrosoft Outlook" tab and then "Select Folders" button. I browsed to the proper folders in Outlook (Calendar, Tasks, etc). Select OK enough times and retried the sync.
It worked. -
VAULT size is smaller than the LIBRARY
my vault size is smaller than the aperture library. is it saving everything? it seems like the two should be the same size or at least close to the same size. i regularly update my vault so that it is current with the library. VAULT = 168 GB | LIBRARY = 262 GB
what is the consequence if i totally turn previews off?
The major consequence is that you will not be able to share images from your library through the media browser. So if you want to email an image for example or add an image to a document you will need to export the image first rather then be able to get the preview from the library.
Also if you have referenced originals and the originals go off-line nothing will appear in the library. If you had previews for those images you would still see them and be able to do tasks like rate them.
Finally some operations might appear slower as you won;t see anything on the scree until the image you are looking at is rendered. With previews while Aperture is rendering the image in the background it will display the preview.
It is possible to selectively maintain previews for some projects and not for others. This might be a comprise position between having previews for al images and having no previews at all. -
When I have the downloads window open and I close the browser window, the next time I reopen the browser while the downloads are still going, it returns me to the last page I was on. All previous versions of Firefox would return me to my homepage which I would prefer. Please let me know if this is possible.
When you re-open Firefox and choose Restore Session, by default it picks up your most-recently-open window, and the other windows should then show up in Recently Closed Windows.
The Firefox add-on Session Manager lets you manage how many closed windows and closed tabs are saved, in case it's not enough. -
Closing the browser in InfoView doesn't log the user off.
In Business Objects XI R2 Infoview, closing the browser in InfoView doesn't log the user off no matter how you answer the subsequent popup question "A window has closed. Log off as well?" Is there a fix for this somewhere?
hi,
In InfoView, with Performance Management installed, user sessions fail to be released immediately when the Log Off button is clicked.
If you click the logoff button in Infoview and watch the address bar you will notice that it actually goes to another page called default.htm. It does this really fast. That page is located at C:\Program Files\Business Objects\Tomcat\webapps\businessobjects\enterprise115\desktoplaunch\InfoView. Remove both the default.htm and index.html and reboot your Tomcat server. Open a browser and go to Infoview. Once you have gotten in to Infoview click the log off button. You will get and error from the tomcat server and that is because the page does not exist anymore. If you look in CMS under servers and CMS you will also notice it dropped the session as well. So if you create another Default.htm page of your own and just redirect to another page it all should work.
However I did notice an interesting ADAPT in CHF15 :-
http://support.businessobjects.com/CommunityCS/FilesAndUpdates/boxir2_en_chf15_readme.pdf
ADAPT00576483 Patch ID: 39,216,665
Also did u do any customization setting before ? -
"Hard drive is smaller than the one originally installed"
Hi,
Recently, a coworker installed several viruses on his 9300 elite running Windows 7 x32. After trying several things and not being able to get rid of them, I ordered the recovery disks from HP. I ran the disks, and everything appeared to work fine until the recovery finished. The PC would restart, act like it was booting into windows (windows splash screen), then go to an HP screen that would say "HP is initializing software install" or something along those lines. It would sit for a minute then give me the error "an unrecoverable error has occurred. please contact system administrator. press enter to reboot".
I thought it might be a problem with the disks, so I ordered replacement disks. Now, as soon as I put in the supplemental disk and click "next", I get the error "hard drive is smaller than one originally installed". No hard drive has ever been replaced on the PC that I know of. I'm not sure how to fix this.I just got this same message--did you ever get this resolved?
-
Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
Thanks.Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
Thanks. -
the speakers of my brand new mac book pro are not working and I cannot plug in the earphones, the hole looks smaller than the pin or with an obstruction. anybody can help? thanks
Hi talero,
Contact AppleCare or bring it into an Apple Store or AASP.
Maybe you are looking for
-
my Order Number 2510885387 and i have ordered for developer account but when i am checking the status it is still saying no order done in last 30 days
-
Findforward() results in infinite loop and server exits
I have a dataform which has struts html text field and 3 poplist bound to database fields. I do a submit on the event onChange in the first poplist and it will call a custom method in app module, which will setup the VO for populating the second popl
-
My page is not showing up right
I created my page in dreamweaver 8 and when I upload it to my ftp server from godaddy.com the page is showing up different from how it looked when I created it.
-
Adobe Flash Player ActiveX ver. 10.0.22.87
I was visiting a website that utilizes Adobe Flash, and it said there was an error and that my Flash Player might need to be upgraded. So, I upgraded to the current version (10.0.22.87) and now I can't view anything Flash. I've tried uninstalling F
-
Can I take a panoramic photo and show it in Keynote?
I have a camera that will let me take panoramic photos (similar to the iPhone 5). I'd like to show the photo as a 360 moving panorama. Is there a way to do that in Keynote? Or will I just have to import it as a movie? Thanks!