Time-Based Workflow Using Together Workflow Editor

hello experts,
Is there any script or functionality in Together Workflow Editor to create Time-Based workflow.In case the approval status is pending fo a particular duration of time  it should go for approval to another user(approver).
Thanks and Regard,
Piyush S

I don't think there is a standard functionality for that. Isn't it maybe possible to work with a Timer object?

Similar Messages

  • Scheduling Time Based Jobs using Web Dynpros.

    Hello Again,
    I would like to know if it is possible to perform time based jobs using Web Dynpros, I have a situation where a Web Dynpro application updates a Database and then later during the day say at around 9:00 PM, I would like the Web Dynpro application to transfer all the updated Data to another Database, I know we can run a batch job but can we run create a Web Dynpro application to programatically fire a batch job at the required time.
    I am welcome to any suggestions.
    Best Wishes,
    John.

    Hi John,
    WD is not good option for this. I would suggest you to "extract" logic to separate layer and use Timeout service (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_webas630/helpdata/en/6b/2550d23ef1994580114d6064bc44a1/frameset.htm) - call logic from service.
    Best regards, Maksim Rashchynski.

  • Custom Workflow using Oracle Workflow in ContentDB

    Hi,
    Could we use custom workflow which is made using Oracle Workflow instead of BPEL.
    Regards,
    Yulisar

    Having registered custom workflows for Content DB via Enterprise Manager, potentially you can use any tool capable of dequeuing/enqueing messages from the IFS_BPEL_OUT/IFS_BPEL_IN advanced queues as part of a custom workflow process.
    By default, we assume you are using Oracle BPEL PM with its Advanced Queue adapater to process the queue messages. However, there is nothing stopping using Oracle Workflow or any tool for that matter.
    HOWEVER!!! Warning!!! There is a high probability that Content DB will drop the bundled Oracle Worflow installation in the near future. What this means, is that you should consider installing/configure/patching your own separate Oracle Workflow installation and not rely on the bundled Content DB solution which is used internally for Serial and Parallel Approval workflows.
    thanks,
    Matt.

  • Min max lot size time based for use with SNP and PPDS

    Hi all, Is there anyway to set up time based min and max lot sizes? ie we want to have a Max lot size which is small for use with the first 3 months of our plan which starts life in SNP and then converts to PPDS and into blocks for block planning, but months 4 to 36 we want to leave as large max lot sizes as there is no need to have the small max lot sizes for the different horizon.
    As far as I can see there is only a material/plant lot size  and Max lot size and no way to have a different setting in a different time period.
    Thanks
    j

    Hi John,
    As you know, in the product master, the lot size maintenance is time-independent, so that obviously can not be used for your scenario. As per my understanding, to meet this using standard functionality, you can maintain multiple product specific t-lanes (for STRs) and PDSs (planned orders) with required lot size ranges and validity dates (for short or long term horizon). But, again since the validity of t-lanes and PDSs will not be automatically rolling forward so the updating the validities will be a challenge.
    The other option could be to enhance the heuristic functionality at lot size selection step while creating order.
    Regards,
    Umesh

  • Informatica Start Workflow failed in Workflow Manager

    Hi,
    I have just completed the installation of oracle BI Apps version 7.9.4 (Chapter 4 & 5 of installtion document). Now I am trying to run workflow using informatica workflow manager and i am getting below error in workflow log.
    It says "Cannot find specified parameter file [opt/oracle/informatica/server/SrcFiles/PLP.PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update.txt] for session [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update].]."
    What does this mean? Do i need to perform any post installation steps? If yes, what are those? Were can i find the information on what needs to be done for loading the data?
    Error Log:
    INFO : LM_36435 : (8588|-1567704144) Starting execution of workflow [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update] in folder [PLP] last saved by user [Administrator].
    INFO : LM_36330 [Tue Feb 26 23:46:06 2008] : (8588|-1567704144) Start task instance [Start]: Execution started.
    INFO : LM_36318 [Tue Feb 26 23:46:06 2008] : (8588|-1567704144) Start task instance [Start]: Execution succeeded.
    INFO : LM_36505 : (8588|-1567704144) Link [Start --> PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: empty expression string, evaluated to TRUE.
    INFO : LM_36330 [Tue Feb 26 23:46:06 2008] : (8588|-1567704144) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: Execution started.
    INFO : LM_36522 : (8588|-1567704144) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: Started DTM process [pid = 9081] for this session instance.
    INFO : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: LM_36033 [Connected to repository [Oracle_BI_DW_Base] running on server:port [PUNITP85528D.ad.infosys.com]:[5001] user [Administrator]].
    ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Tue Feb 26 23:46:14 2008]].
    ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: VAR_27015 [Cannot find specified parameter file [/opt/oracle/informatica/server/SrcFiles/PLP.PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update.txt] for session [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update].].
    ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Tue Feb 26 23:46:14 2008]].
    ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: TM_6269 [Error: The session cannot open the parameter file.].
    ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Tue Feb 26 23:46:14 2008]].
    ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: TM_6163 [Error initializing variables and parameters for the paritition.].
    ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Tue Feb 26 23:46:14 2008]].
    ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: TM_6226 [ERROR:  Failed to initialize session [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]].
    ERROR : LM_36320 [Tue Feb 26 23:46:16 2008] : (8588|-1578194000) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: Execution failed.
    WARNING : LM_36331 : (8588|-1578194000) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update] failed and its "fail parent if this task fails" setting is turned on. So, Workflow [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update] will be failed.
    ERROR : LM_36320 : (8588|-1578194000) Workflow [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: Execution failed.
    Thanks,
    Prasad Narvekar

    Hi Damon,
    I am getting below error in DAC log
    ANOMALY INFO::: Error while evaluating $$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE
    MESSAGE:::No value for @DAC_SOURCE_REFRESH_TIMESTAMP available!
    EXCEPTION CLASS::: com.siebel.analytics.etl.converter.evaluator.EvaluationException
    com.siebel.analytics.etl.converter.evaluator.TimestampEvaluator.evaluate(TimestampEvaluator.java:243)
    com.siebel.analytics.etl.runtime.RuntimeFunctionHelper.getEvaluatedParameters(RuntimeFunctionHelper.java:195)
    com.siebel.etl.engine.core.Session.run(Session.java:2955)
    java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
    17828 INFO Sun Mar 02 20:54:23 IST 2008 Error while evaluating $$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE_IN_SQL_FORMAT
    Mar 2, 2008 8:54:23 PM global
    INFO: Error while evaluating $$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE_IN_SQL_FORMAT
    17829 FINEST Sun Mar 02 20:54:23 IST 2008
    ANOMALY INFO::: Error while evaluating $$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE_IN_SQL_FORMAT
    MESSAGE:::No value for @DAC_SOURCE_REFRESH_TIMESTAMP available!
    EXCEPTION CLASS::: com.siebel.analytics.etl.converter.evaluator.EvaluationException
    com.siebel.analytics.etl.converter.evaluator.TimestampEvaluator.evaluate(TimestampEvaluator.java:243)
    com.siebel.analytics.etl.runtime.RuntimeFunctionHelper.getEvaluatedParameters(RuntimeFunctionHelper.java:195)
    com.siebel.etl.engine.core.Session.run(Session.java:2955)
    java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
    I have created the custome container and set these values thee. but somehow they are not available for execution plan.
    How do we set this values in custom container?
    Thanks,
    Prasad N.

  • What is a time based scenario in TDMS?

    We need only to transfer the data from the last 90 days.
    We know we should use time based scenario. However we cannot find instruction how to implement this scenario.
    Could you help?  Thanks!

    Hi
    Describing how to do time based reduction using TDMS will not be possible over this medium. It is recommended that you refer to the TDMS guides (specifically the Solution operation guide). Refer to the following thread for the same -
    Links, Documents, Support Pack Schedule
    However i will brief you some steps - Once you are on the TDMS overview screen do the following steps -
    1) create project
    2) create sub-project
    3) create package (use the option "initial package for time based reduction from the popup")
    4) once the package screen appears execute various activities of the package in correct order. Detailed documentation for each activity is available on the package screen.
    I hope this helps
    Pankaj

  • Time Based Workflow - how to make it work?

    Hello,
    Has anyone successfully built a Time Based Workflow? Could you share your examples?
    For me it does not work properly.
    I have tried to set up 2 workflows: on Opportunity Close Date and Account Contract Expiration Date.
    - Account Contract Expiration Date: I want an Account Owner to get an email notification exactly 6 months before the contract with his client expires. However - the email is triggered each time the record is modified - so I have seen in the workflow monitor that users on the date of contract expiration - 180 days will receive as many emails as many times they modified the record! Is there a way to avoid this situation?
    - Opportunity Close Date - I want to send an email to Opportunity Owner's Manager - 10 days after the opportunity was closed. However - there will be the same issue as above + the wait action is not working with a PRE function.
    Please let me know what you think and if you have already built a Time Based Workflow that works correctly.
    Edited by: MagdaR on May 18, 2010 1:57 AM

    Let's start with the workflow for Opty Close Date.
    There are a lot of ways to do this, so you'll need to evaluate which way is best for your case, but the basics are to check to ensure that the opty is closed for the first time, then set the flag. In order to accomodate for the opty being closed when it is created, you will have to consider a post default for the flag in addition to the workflow.
    In this case, you could create a workflow on Opty using the before modified record saved trigger event. In the Rule Condition, have the workflow check for a closed opty and if the status changed to closed during this modification. There are a number of options to validate this, including sales stage = Closed/Won or Lost, Closed Date is populated for the first time, Status is closed. In any case, just validate that the opty was closed for the first time using the PRE Function (i.e., PRE(Closed Date) is null and PRE(Closed Date)<>Closed Date). When your condition is met, set a flag that will trigger the event. You could also add a date that the wf conditions were met the first time, to ensure that you track when the rule was originally triggered.
    The next step is to have a workflow that unsets the flag if the conditions are not met. Set the order on this one to follow the rule above.
    The last rule is the wait/email rule and it uses the when modified record saved event. This rule triggers on the flag being checked, then waits to send the email.
    Test this and validate that it will work for your purposes. Based on this workflow, you should be able to create the other one, and I can help if you have any issues.
    Good Luck,
    Thom

  • Time based workflow over long Period

    Hello,
    I'm looking for experiences on Time based workflow over long Period.(Over 1 or 2 years).
    Does any limitation exist ?
    Thanks for your help.

    I dont think there will be anyone who can really verify this information over two years im not sure that they have been in use this long

  • Time Based Workflow - update existing activities?

    Hi, I've added a checkbox field to my activities template, and wondered if it is possible to update this field on existing >124K activity records using a time based workflow. <br><br> Has anyone come across this requirement, or have any thoughts on how to solve the issue? <br><br> Thanking you in advance for assistance.
    Edited by: Sherry10602332 on Oct 11, 2010 12:07 PM

    Hello SKJ
    Your requirement is to send an email notification to an owner if the Opportunity remains with sales Stage = "Inquiry" for more than 90 days.
    New Record Saved.
    This means even the opportunity can be modified but the sales stage should not change. For e.g. when i create a new record, I can have the sales stage as "Inquiry" and save. At a later date I can modify the description of the opportunity (this would change the modified date), but the sales stage remains at Inquiry. Thus the notification should go 90 days after the sales stage has been set and not since last modified date. Keeping this in mind the condition the rule condition "Rule Condition : Sales stage = "Inquiry" and modified date = Created date" needs to be modified as Sales stage = "Inquiry".
    Coming to Modified Condition:
    Trigger Event - When Modified Record Saved
    Rule Condition : (PRE('<SalesStage>')<>[<SalesStage>] AND [<SalesStage>]="Inquiry") OR ([<SalesStage>]="Inquiry")
    Wait 90 Days
    Revaluate Conditon = 'Y'
    Action Send Email Notification
    Explanation
    When you set the sales Stage as "Inquiry", the condition (PRE('<SalesStage>')<>[<SalesStage>] AND [<SalesStage>]="Inquiry") would be satissfied and then the workflow would trigger. After 90 days if the sales stage is still in "Inquiry", the second part of the condition "[<SalesStage>]="Inquiry" would be satisfied and the email notification would be sent. If the sales stage has been changed to other sales stage, then the condition would fail and the notification would not be sent.
    Regards,
    Paul Swarnapandian

  • Time Based workflow not working

    Hi,
    I am facing issue in time based workflow. I designed a worflow with two actions. Wait action is the first action and second action is send email. For send email the from address is current user and TO is owner of the record. One thing I noticed is that its working fine when "I" triggered the workflow and assign owner as "me". Its not trigerring the mail when owner is somebody else. I can see the instance with the following error message in the workflow monitor. "The buscomp Service Request is no longer valid for workflow name ********. The workflow instance ******* has terminated."
    Edited by: user11100286 on Oct 1, 2010 4:33 PM

    Hi,
    I am facing issue in time based workflow. I designed a worflow with two actions. Wait action is the first action and second action is send email. For send email the from address is current user and TO is owner of the record. One thing I noticed is that its working fine when "I" triggered the workflow and assign owner as "me". Its not trigerring the mail when owner is somebody else. I can see the instance with the following error message in the workflow monitor. "The buscomp Service Request is no longer valid for workflow name ********. The workflow instance ******* has terminated."
    Edited by: user11100286 on Oct 1, 2010 4:33 PM

  • Time based workflow

    There is a field "Delivery date" in oppty & we want to send a reminder mail 10 days before delivery date once that oppty is closed/won.
    So, how can i write that expression?

    Thanks but i know that i'll have to write time based workflow,however there is provision of wait for +10 days after some event happens & not -10 days.
    Ketki

  • Time based workflow:wait action not working

    I need to build a workflow for sending mail to manager if for an opportunity sales stage "requirement" remains for more than 30 days,I have given the workflow condition as:
    ([<SalesStage>] = "01 - Requirements")
    & then 2 actions 1st "Wait" & then "Send mail" somehow its not working.Please guide where i am getting wrong..

    Let me understand your business case: You need to send ONE email to the manager of the opportunity owner, if the Sales Stage = '01 - Requirements' for more that 30 days.
    You need two workflows and a unused/custom field (a boolean field is preferred). Both workflows are similar. The first workflow is based on the event - When new record saved. This workflow will be invoked as soon as a new opportunity is created. The second workflow is invoked whenever the opportunity is modified using the event - When modified record saved. Any user who has edit rights to the opportunity could modify the opportunity but not change the sales stage. This results in an unpleasant situation where the manager could be flooded with emails. That's where we use the boolean field to protect against multiple updates and ensure a single email is sent after 30 days if the sales stage is still '01 - Requirements'
    Workflow 1
    Record Type: Opportunity
    Event: When new record saved
    Condition:[<SalesStageId>] = "12ASA-XCD34" AND ([<IndexedBoolean0>] IS NULL OR [<IndexedBoolean0>] = "N")
    Note:
    1. IndexedBoolean0 is the field named Indexed Checkbox in the list of fields
    2. I have used the sales stage id. You have to find out the sales stage id for '01 - Requirements' and use it here.
    Workflow 1 - Actions (remember to activate all actions and workflows)
    1. Action = Wait
    Period= 30 days
    Reevaluate Rule Conditions After Wait = Y
    2. Action = Field Update After Wait
    Field Name = Indexed Checkbox
    Value = "Y"
    Overwrite Existing Values = Y
    3. Action = Email
    From > Specific Email Address> "[email protected]"
    To > Relative User On Record > Opportunity Owner's Manager
    Repeat this workflow configuration for Workflow 2, where the only difference is the event which should be When modified record saved
    Exposing the Indexed Checkbox on the opportunity detail page layout for all users is optional (not recommended). It might be a good idea to expose this checkbox on the opportunity detail page for the administrator role only... so that he/she can take corrective action if an email is not sent after 30 days.

  • Time Based Workflow in R16

    Can someone confirm that Time Based Workflows will be in R16? I have heard talk of this but not able to find confirmed documentation that it will be included.
    Thanks

    Time based workflows aren't in R16, we'll check again when R17 come out.
    cheers
    Alex

  • Remote Voice Over Workflows using FCP - thoughts?

    I am going to try and keep this as simple as possible.
    I am Producer and host for an Australian Drag Racing Show that we air nationally...
    We record these shows in Full 1080 HD using modern XFILE systems (EVS) using the Apple ProRes 422 (HQ) codec.
    Our ENG/EFP team use XDCAM (full 1080i HD).
    We edit these shows using FCP 7 amongst a few suites.
    I also do some offline content on my 17inch i7 MBP using FCP too.
    My question is thus:
    The Post Production Team are based in Sydney on the east coast, whilst I am based in Western Australia - this is like being in LA in comparison to New York!
    I want to reduce my travel commitment by air, as in the past I have travelled weekly to commentate these shows (40+ shows a year!)
    I have - as does the production house - a reasonably good ADSL Internet connection.
    I do a lot of Producing and program checks using iChat Theatre within FCP 7. It is quite good.
    What I want to get to though is a way in being able to more often commentate these shows remotely from home, without the need for me to physically having to be across country on every occasion - for my sanity's sake.
    My co-commentator also lives near me, however our editors are all based across country, together in Sydney.
    I see the following options as being the way to do this:
    OPTION 1.
    When we ingest (log and transfer) the vision, I will always be in Sydney at that time. There are usually several shows generated from this vision.
    I copy the Quicktime MOV files that are for use in the shows to my external (eSATA) HD.
    Editors in Sydney cut the racing components of our show. They then email me the FCP project file.
    (I have FCP, the required Audio and Mics)
    Then, I open this FCP Project File and re-link and re-render as required once I receive this and we commentate the shows using the VO utility within Final Cut.
    I then do an Audio export only and send the editors the updated FCP Project file, for them to receive and re-link the vision as required, sound mix and print.
    OPTION 2.
    The Editors cut the shows, then export either within FCP or Compressor a reduced quality file size to send via FTP or sendspace.
    I then import this vision locally into FCP, render the vision and commentate it accordingly and just send back the audio.
    SO:
    What would you all suggest as the easiest and best way to do this. We do have tight work timeframes in terms of getting content to air.
    I think Option1 is by far the best, and what I am not sure about is if I did Option2 - what settings for export and I want to avoid bogging down the editors on handling cumbersome vision exports anyway?
    Thoughts?
    Dean...

    I would probably go with option 2, myself - I usually export my cuts and run the movie thru compressor with the H.264 LAN or H.264 800KBPS presets. These are found under Apple/Other Workflows/Web/Streaming/Quicktime 7/
    These take up roughly 10MB per minute and 5MB per minute respectively.
    While I have used Option 1 (duplicate media, transferring a project file), this can get problematic when the editors have generated media - like effects, color correction, etc...
    my 2¢
    Patrick

  • Having some major mac - pc issues using remote workflow

    Hi all. I'm having some major issues using the InCopy workflow and was hoping someone could help me out with a few items.
    I've helped a client out with their workflow, proposing, demoing and promoting the InCopy workflow which seemed to be the best solution. And don't get me wrong when posting this message on the forum: I love the InCopy workflow and think it's briliant.
    The scenario is that a design agency needs to deliver the layout for a big annual report for their client, who then makes changes in the text etc. The design agency is on a mac (ofcourse), but the endclient is on a PC. Now after some training and trying this all works fine. They are using the remote workflow, using icap and idap files (which they place on dropbox for easy transfer)
    But they've been having so many issues these last few weeks, it's been crazy. And I'm actually starting to feel a bit uncomfortable every time they call me. Just to make clear, they love InCopy (... when it works). And eventhough I'm a huge supporter of the program I just wanted to make sure if there are any other glitches that I should know about. The thing is that (because I work for an IT company), every time they need support they get billed ofcourse. But the problem is that everytime they run into some kind of problem, production just stops and they need me to fix everything.
    Issues that they are having:
    - the endclient (so copywriter) works on a project all weekend (an icap file). Saves everything, checks in, closes, goes to bed. Next morning (monday) she opens up the same file to continue working and gets the "cannot recover..." error (see attachment). And she looses her edits. You need to understand that these copywriters really know what they're doing with InCopy.
    - when a colleague of hers is working with InCopy, and InCopy crashes and she reopens her file then it also happens that the checked-out stories from before remain checked out and she cannot continue (because the story has already been checked out by "another user" (herself)). I managed to resolve this by opening up the individual icml files in incopy and just closing them again. That seemed to remove the "lock" status of the icmls. But still they need me for support. This also happened in the design agency. They are working on a layout, check out stories, InDesign crashes, reopen file and stories remain checkout and they cannot continue because InDesign thinks that they're checked out to another user. And they do not have InCopy themselves so I cannot use my "open icml in incopy and close"-workaround.
    - after a few extra InCopy crashes (where InCopy.exe just doesn't feel like doing anything anymore and quits), I decided to place their files (unpacked icma and icmls from the icap) on the C drive instead of on their server and this seemed to resolve a bit of the trouble. The workflow seems to be a lot more stable now. I did this because they also received the dreaded "Error: code 0" message when starting up (and again) she lost her work). After some creative googling I was able to find out that this might have something to do with disk permissions and copy-paste issues on a PC server. Anyway, it was worth a try
    - only yesterday the client called me stating she couldn't start up her icap files anymore. I was able to recover the indiviual icml files and send these back to the design agency and recover part of her work. (after combing out the files I discovered on of the icml files was damaged and could not be opened, that is why opening the icap file failed).
    - and one last issue (which isn't really a problem but just a bit of a rant ;-). Why does it take 8 full minutes to open up a 2,6Mb icap file on a fast laptop (from the HD)? Even on my own laptop it takes several minutes? I know that the waiting time has something to do with the complexity of the files (images, how many styles, how many icmls, etc). But it seems ridiculously long.
    They've been having issues like this on a weekly basis and they're starting to loose faith in the solution because it's costing them more money (via support) then it's saving them.
    Does anyone have any experience with this? Is this because it's a mac-pc workflow? I understand that this is officially supported, but it practice teaches us that it's in fact not that stable I'd rather just recommend the client to get a mac from the start. Every client would rather hear that than having to deal with all these issues. And I have to say I'm very happy with the client for being so understanding, but I think they'll run out of patience soon if this keeps up. I've also included some other "postcards from InCopy" ;-) and so you must understand if you get all these errors during the last 3 weeks losing hours of work ... well it's just not fun anymore.
    Thank you all very much, and hopefully see you guys at PepCon this year.
    Bart

    Hi Bob,
    You are right, I didn't give this information. I must have forgotten.
    Designers are working with:
    OSX 10.7.2
    InDesign CS5.5 (fully patched)
    Copywriters are working with:
    Windows 7
    InCopy CS5.5 (also fully pathed).
    There is no font managing software used, everyone uses open-type fonts which they specifically purchased for this workflow.
    If the problem persists I will try with the assignment based workflow on dropbox. I waited with this workflow because the client wants to keep their files on their server so they can have backups if something goes wrong. I know Dropbox makes backup as well, but lets just say they have more faith in their own systeem (dropbox was completely new to them ).
    So there are no reports of an unstable mac-pc InCopy workflow?
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for