Time limit exceeded when doing MIRO

Hi Experts,
time limit exceeded error occured when doing MIRO transaction.
plz reply with suitable answer.
Thanks,
Jyosna

>
jyotsna shinde wrote:
> plz reply with suitable answer.
Moderator message - Please see Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum before posting - post locked
Rob

Similar Messages

  • Short dump "Time limit exceeded" when searching for Business Transactions

    Hello Experts,
    We migrated from SAP CRM 5.2 to SAP CRM 7.0. After migration, our business transaction search (quotation, sales order, service order, contract etc) ends with the short dump "Time limit exceeded" in class CL_CRM_REPORT_ACC_DYNAMIC, method DATABASE_ACCESS. The select query is triggered from line 5 of this method.
    Number of Records:
    CRMD_ORDERADM_H: 5,115,675
    CRMD_ORDER_INDEX: 74,615,914
    We have done these so far, but the performance is still either poor or times out.
    1. DB team checked the ORACLE parameters and confirmed they are fine. They also checked the health of indices in table CRMD_ORDER_INDEX and indices are healthy
    2. Created additional indices on CRMD_ORDERADM_H and CRMD_ORDER_INDEX. After the creation of indices, some of the searches(without any criteria) work. But it takes more than a minute to fetch 1 or 2 records
    3. An ST05 trace confirmed that the selection on CRMD_ORDER_INDEX takes the most time. It takes about 103 seconds to fetch 2 records (max hits + 1)
    4. If we specify search parameters, say for example a date or status, then again we get a short dump with the message "Time limit exceeded".
    5. Observed that only if a matching index is available for the WHERE clause, the results are returned (albeit slowly). In the absence of an index, we get the dump.
    6. Searched for notes and there are no notes that could help us.
    Any idea what is causing this issue and what we can do to resolve this?
    Regards,
    Bala

    Hi Michael,
    Thanks. Yes we considered the note 1527039. None of the three scenarios mentioned in the note helped us. But we ran CRM_INDEX_REBUILD to check if the table CRMD_ORDER_INDEX had a problem. That did not help us either.
    The business users told us that they mostly search using the date fields or Object ID. We did not have any problem with search by Object ID. So we created additional indices to support search using the date fields.
    Regards,
    Bala

  • Time Limit exceeded error in ALV report

    I am gettting error "Time Limit Exceeded" when i execute ALV report. Can i run the program in background and how to do that?. I had already optimized my query in the program but even then i am facing the same issue.

    You can process the alv in background by pressing F9...I guess that the output would be available as a spool in SP01.
    You may need to re-check your query...And also, review the alv catalog and any events you are using....
    Greetings,
    Blag.

  • Time Limit Exceeded. JDBC Adapter

    Hello guys,
    we have problem in an interface in production.
    The interface is asynchronous and is File -> PI -> JDBC
    Some messages have sometimes an error in PI monitorization, and we can see the next error:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Receiver Grouping
      -->
    - <SAP:Error SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">SYSTEM_DUMP</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:Stack>XXXX : XXXX___0000 : Time limit exceeded.</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    It seems there is an error when sending to the JDBC adapter? The concurrency of the adpter is set to 1 and we send 7 messages to the same adapter and the messages are executed more or less at the same time.
    Could we have to do some PI configuration about queues? or maybe is about the concurrency of the adapter?
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Xavier.

    You might need to increase MAXIMUM CONCURRENCY > 1 and set poolWaitingTime > 0 as per SAP Note 831162. By doing this will alow JDBC Receiver to process concurrency the request from Integration Engine.
    or you also can try to increase "Recv.maxConsumers" for JDBC Adapter. The current value is 5
    In addition above, since more messages are concurrently happening more or less at the same time, I would recommend also to use this parameter setting.... Go to advanced tab in the jdbc receiver channel.
    check the option "Disconnect from Database After Processing Each message".  This would help if the connection is not immediately return to the other thread after serving the first thread.  Plus it is a best practice to follow up.

  • Check if A/R summary has exceeded time limit:exceeded by days/hours 42 14 ?

    When I place an sale order with VA01, there is a warnning:
    Check if A/R summary has exceeded time limit:exceeded by days/hours 42 14
    What does it mean?

    Hi
    Check wheather you have done credit management or not. So check in OVA8 wheather you have maintained data or not. Also check in FD32 wheather you have maintained A/R summary for that customer.or not .
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Time Limit exceeded error in R & R queue

    Hi,
    We are getting Time limit exceeded error in the R & R queue when we try to extract the data for a site.
    The error is happening with the message SALESDOCGEN_O_W. It is observed that whenever, the timelimit error is encountered, the possible solution is to run the job in the background. But in this case, is there any possibility to run the particular subscription for sales document in the background.
    Any pointers on this would be of great help.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Rasmi.

    Hi Rasmi
    I suppose that the usual answer would be to increase the timeout for the R&R queue.
    We have increased the timeout on ours to 60 mins and that takes care of just about everything.
    The other thing to check would be the volume of data that is going to each site for SALESDOCGEN_O_W. These are pretty big BDOCs and the sales force will not thank you for huge contranns time 
    If you have a subscription for sales documents by business patrner, then it is worth seeing if the business partner subscription could be made more intelligent to fit your needs
    Regards
    James

  • PI 7.0: IDOCs struck in IDX5 with error "Time Limit Exceeded".

    Hi All,
    We have a File to IDOC scenario in PI 7.0. After mapping the IDOCs are posted from PI to ECC System.
    On a normal day this interface works good, yesterday we received a huge file which resulted in the creation of about 25000 IDOCs from one single file. The mapping went fine, however the IDOCs created were not posted into ECC System. When we monitor the IDOCs using transaction code IDX5 in PI system, we found the error message as "Time limit exceeded", the user shown was "PIAFUSER". To overcome this error, we increased the time limit of PIAFUSER from default to about 1500 seconds.
    Now, I want to push these IDOCs from PI into ECC System. Could you please let us know, how to push these IDOCs sitting in PI system to ECC?
    We do not want to reprocess the file from the beginning. Please let us know if it is possible to push the IDOCs without processing the file? If yes, how to reprocess?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Manohar Dubbaka.

    Hi,
    the help documentation is as follows:
    Check the tRFC Status  
    Use
    tRFC calls which transfer IDocs use the function module IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS at reception (before release 4.0: INBOUND_IDOC_PROCESS).
    If an IDoc in the sending system has been passed to tRFC (IDoc status "03"), but has not yet been input in the receiving system, this means that the tRFC call has not yet been executed.
    Activities
    To check the status of the tRFC calls, choose Tools ® IDoc Interface/ALE ® Administration ® Monitoring ® Troubleshooting ® RFC Queue (SM58) and specify any additional selection criteria.
    The program RSARFCEX restarts unsuccessful tRFC calls.
    You cannot choose the option is being executed in background processing.
    Best Regards,
    Erik Hubers

  • Message getting stuck in XBQO queue - Time limit exceeded

    Hi All,
    We have a BPM scenario in our project (on PI 7.0 SP18), where bundle of PEXR2002 Payment IDocs are received as a single flat file. This file is then consumed by the BPM, to split the message into multiple payments using Java Mapping.
    However, when we get an IDoc file of size greater than 5 MB (more than 500 IDocs), the message gets stuck in XBQO queue and eventually giving a SYSFAIL with the message "Time limit exceeded". Could you please let us know if you have encountered a similar issue and are aware of a possible solution.
    Any pointers to this will be really appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ROSIE SASIDHARAN

    H Rosie,
    1)  Goto SXMB_ADM-> Integration Engine Configuration->Parameter  EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT->possible values 0 - 2,097,151 (KB)
    The parameter EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT enables serial processing of messages of a particular size. This applies for messages with the quality of service Exactly Once (EO). If the message is larger than the parameter value, the message is processed in a separate queue.
    2)  Goto SXMB_ADM-> Integration Engine Configuration->Parameter  HTTP_TIMEOUT->possible values n Seconds, where n is a whole number.
    The parameter Specifies the timeout for HTTP connections (time between two data packages at line level). This value overrides the system profile parameter icm/server_port_n (for example, icm/server_port_0 : PROT=HTTP, PORT=50044, TIMEOUT=900). If you do not set the parameter HTTP_TIMEOUT or if you set the parameter to 0, then the setting for the system profile parameter is used.
      See SAP Note 335162  for sysfail issue....
      Hope these will help u....
    Regds,
    Pinangshuk.

  • Time limit exceeded in inbound qRfc

    Hi all!
    Please I need your help with this timeout issue. I have the following scenario:
    FTP --> XI (Java mapping) --> R3 (Idoc)
    Where from that Java mapping I do some RFC's to R3 in order to make conversions and validations.
    When I test this interface in development environment with a 1Mb flat file, it took 5 minutes to process. However, i did the same test in QA environment, it took pretty much more than 5 minutes and I got this "time limit exceeded" in the qRfc inbound queue (sxmb_moni t-code).
    I was told that the hardware beneath development and QA are different but theorically, the later should be faster.
    Anyone has any suggestion to resolve this? I will really appreciate it.
    Best regards!
    Vanesa.

    Hi,
    have a look on this doc called "HowTou2026 Investigate Timeouts in Synchronous XI/PI Scenario"
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c059d583-a551-2c10-e095-eb5d95e03747
    You will certainly find your answer.
    Regards.
    Mickael

  • Runtime error(Time limit exceeds)after executing select query

    Dear experts, whenever i executing the select query in this zprogram i am getting runtime error that time limit exceeds.i am using inner join and into table.after that also i am geetting error. how can i resolve it??
    SELECT LIKP~VBELN LIKP~WADAT_IST LIKP~VEHICLE_NO LIKP~TRNAME
              LIKP~VEHI_TYPE LIKP~LR_NO LIKP~ANZPK LIKP~W_BILL_NO
              LIKP~SEALNO1                                       " Seal NO1
              LIKP~SEALNO2                                       " Seal NO2
              LIPS~LFIMG
              VBRP~VBELN VBRP~VGBEL VBRP~MATNR VBRP~AUBEL VBRP~FKIMG
              VBAK~AUART
              VBRK~FKART VBRK~KNUMV VBRK~FKSTO
              FROM LIKP INNER JOIN LIPS ON LIKP~VBELN EQ LIPS~VBELN
                        INNER JOIN VBRP ON LIKP~VBELN EQ VBRP~VGBEL
                        INNER JOIN VBAK ON VBRP~AUBEL EQ VBAK~VBELN
                        INNER JOIN VBRK ON VBRP~VBELN EQ VBRK~VBELN
              INTO TABLE  I_FINAL_TEMP
              WHERE LIKP~VSTEL = '5100' AND
                 LIKP~WADAT_IST IN S_WADAT  AND
                    VBRP~AUBEL IN S_AUBEL AND
                    VBAK~AUART IN ('ZJOB','ZOR') AND
                    VBRK~FKART IN S_FKART AND
    *               VBRK~FKART IN ('ZF8','ZF2','ZS1') AND
                    VBRK~FKSTO NE 'X'.
    When I am debugging the select query.the cursor will not go to next step.after 15-20 minutes i am getting runtime error(time limit exceeds).
    how can i resolve it for that scenario??

    Looks like whole SD flow you trying to fetch in single query
    First you check the database statistic of these table are upto date in system ( Check with basis team )
    if this query was working fine earlier.
    Most of table involved are huge volume tables which queried with any primary key
    Any secondary index on created for LIKP on VSTEL WADET ?
    My suggestion would be split the selection queries and make use of primary or existing secondary index to fetch the desired result if possible. For testing purpose split the queries and find which is taking more time and which needs index by taking squel trace in ST05.
    Also take ST05 trace of this query in debugger ( New debugger -> special tool -> trace > ST05/SE30)

  • Error "time limit Exceed"?"

    hi Experts,
    What to do when a load is failing with "time limit Exceed"?

    Hi,
    Time outs can be due to many reasons.  You will need to find out for your specific build.  Some of the common ones are:
    1. You could have set a large packet size.  See in the monitor whether the number of records in one packet seem inordinately large, say 100,000.  Reduce the number in steps and see which ones work for you.
    2.  The target may have a large number of fields, even then you will receive a time out as the size of the packet may become large.  Same solution as point 1.
    3.  You may have built an index in the target ODS which may impact your write speed.  Remove any indexes and run with the same package size, if it works then you know the index is the problem.
    4.  There is a basis setting for time out.  Check that is set as per SAP recommendation for your system.
    5.  Check the transactional RFCs in the source system.  It may have choked due to a large number of errors or hung queues.
    Cheers...

  • DNL_CUST_ADDR "SYSFAIL" with time limit exceeded

    Hi Experts,
    i hope you can help here.
    We set up a new connection between a CRM and an ECC.
    Everything worked fine until we started the initial customizing load.
    All customizing objects went through, besides DNL_CUST_ADDR.
    It stopped in the Inbound Queue  of the CRM with error message "Sysfail" in Detail
    "Time limit exceeded".
    The Solution is not note 873918, we implemented it and it still doesn´t
    work.
    Ahead thank you very much.
    Regards
    Matthias Reich

    Hi Matthias,
       You can try any of the following things.
       Before starting the initial load of this object, change the block size in DNL_CUST_ADDR object to 50. Here delete the current queue and reinitiate the load  OR
       If you don't want to delete the existing queue, basis can increase the GUI maximum time. For this they need to change the parameter rdisp/max_wprun_time. You can see the current max time by executing the program RSPARAM. After doing this setting, you can unlock the queue.
    //Bhanu

  • Mails to 1 particular user is getting bounced - Command time limit exceeded

    I've about 100 mail clients. Since yesterday morning, I've had one user whose incoming emails have been getting bounced. I've run a "mailbfr -m user" w/o success. The server is current on updates and has been restarted. All other users are functioning correctly. Notes:
    -IMAP account
    -This user has a 4GB Sent folder. All other folders are under 2GB.
    -This user has recently starting syncing Notes from a Blackberry.
    THE SMTP LOG:
    Oct 7 08:26:52 myserver postfix/pipe[488]: D1BCE11CE230: to=<[email protected]>, relay=cyrus, delay=1000, delays=0.01/0/0/1000, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command time limit exceeded: "/usr/bin/cyrus/bin/deliver")
    A PORTION OF THE BOUNCE EMAIL SENT TO SENDER:
    This is the mail system at host myserver.com.
    I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
    be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
    For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
    If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
    delete your own text from the attached returned message.
    The mail system
    <[email protected]>: Command time limit exceeded:
    "/usr/bin/cyrus/bin/deliver"
    Reporting-MTA: dns; myserver.com
    X-Postfix-Queue-ID: AD79711CE1DD
    X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [email protected]
    Arrival-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 08:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
    Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected]
    Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
    Action: failed
    Status: 5.3.0
    Diagnostic-Code: x-unix; internal software error
    Any help?

    Solved. This person was in-process of moving Blackberry notes to the imap account. There was an interruption during the transfer phase and the server's Notes folder became bad somehow. When Mailbfr hit that particular folder, it stopped the rebuild process.
    I removed the Notes folder and ran Mailbfr again. The Notes folder was recreated and the rebuild function completed.
    Mail delivery has been restored to this user.

  • TRFC Time limit exceeded

    Hi guys,
    Data loading takes place from ODS to cube is stuck up every day because of Time limit exceeded in TRFC queue.
    it is full load and it contains about  370000 records everyday.
    I set data packet size 10,000 (48000 records per packet) , however it was throughing an error.
    usually it is tacking 3hrs to load from ODS to cube,
    1. why such long time its taking to load from ODS to cube.
    2. is there any memory issue
    3.any other suggestion to avoid data packet stuckup
    4.how to  reduce the loading time.
    or
    whether I can reduce data packet size less than 10,000 to avoid this stuckup or to reduce dtataload time.
    Many thanks
    Ram

    Hi Ram,
    We can increase the Background Process Jobs, it is the BASIS work. Please check it with the basis people they will do it for you..
    Processes are depends on the calculation of the RAM u have minimum is 2 and the maximum is 18 work process per an instance. For the same RAM should have calculated for update process with minimum of 1 and the maximum is 3 background processes with 1-6... Calculations comes like.....RAM/256 for work process and differ for other processes. If you have UNIX environment then you can use as many Processes as you want. Actually, 1 WP allocates approx. 15-20MB RAM when system is  idle.
    Hence forth see your RAM and analyze the Predecessors, then workout this with your BASIS people.
    Pls assign points if useful.
    Cheers!
    Ragahvendra Rao.Kolli

  • Query0;Runtime error time limit exceeded,with parallel processing via RFC

    Dear experts,
    I have created a report on 0cca_c11 cube and while running my report when i give cost center group which contains many cost centers , my report executes for long time and at last gives message
    "Error while reading data;navigation is possible" and
    "Query0;Runtime error time limit exceeded,with parallel processing via RFC"
    please tell me what is the problem and how can i solve this
    Regards
    Shweta

    hI,
    Execute the Query in RSRT with Execute and Debug option.
    Select SQL statements toknow where exactly it's taking time.
    Let us know the details once you done.
    Reg
    Pra

Maybe you are looking for