PI 7.0: IDOCs struck in IDX5 with error "Time Limit Exceeded".

Hi All,
We have a File to IDOC scenario in PI 7.0. After mapping the IDOCs are posted from PI to ECC System.
On a normal day this interface works good, yesterday we received a huge file which resulted in the creation of about 25000 IDOCs from one single file. The mapping went fine, however the IDOCs created were not posted into ECC System. When we monitor the IDOCs using transaction code IDX5 in PI system, we found the error message as "Time limit exceeded", the user shown was "PIAFUSER". To overcome this error, we increased the time limit of PIAFUSER from default to about 1500 seconds.
Now, I want to push these IDOCs from PI into ECC System. Could you please let us know, how to push these IDOCs sitting in PI system to ECC?
We do not want to reprocess the file from the beginning. Please let us know if it is possible to push the IDOCs without processing the file? If yes, how to reprocess?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Manohar Dubbaka.

Hi,
the help documentation is as follows:
Check the tRFC Status  
Use
tRFC calls which transfer IDocs use the function module IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS at reception (before release 4.0: INBOUND_IDOC_PROCESS).
If an IDoc in the sending system has been passed to tRFC (IDoc status "03"), but has not yet been input in the receiving system, this means that the tRFC call has not yet been executed.
Activities
To check the status of the tRFC calls, choose Tools ® IDoc Interface/ALE ® Administration ® Monitoring ® Troubleshooting ® RFC Queue (SM58) and specify any additional selection criteria.
The program RSARFCEX restarts unsuccessful tRFC calls.
You cannot choose the option is being executed in background processing.
Best Regards,
Erik Hubers

Similar Messages

  • IDoc on outbound side from XI - time limit exceeded error

    Hi,
    I have a FIle to IDoc scenario and I'm creating there a lot of idocs (20000) in a single push. I'm getting an error "time limit exceeded" on outbound side with red flag in SXMB_MONI. How to increase this limit parameter? Where to do it? - PI? or R/3?
    Thank you,
    Olian

    Hi,
    Check thios below thread..
    Re: XI timeout error
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/06/08/xi-timeouts-timeouts-timeouts
    Regards,
    Srini

  • Query0;Runtime error time limit exceeded,with parallel processing via RFC

    Dear experts,
    I have created a report on 0cca_c11 cube and while running my report when i give cost center group which contains many cost centers , my report executes for long time and at last gives message
    "Error while reading data;navigation is possible" and
    "Query0;Runtime error time limit exceeded,with parallel processing via RFC"
    please tell me what is the problem and how can i solve this
    Regards
    Shweta

    hI,
    Execute the Query in RSRT with Execute and Debug option.
    Select SQL statements toknow where exactly it's taking time.
    Let us know the details once you done.
    Reg
    Pra

  • IDoc Tracking: TIME LIMIT EXCEEDED

    Hello!
    We have about 15 different R/3 platforms connected to XI using the IDoc adapter. If I use the IDoc Tracking functionality in IDX5 it usually is working fine and the IDoc number in the receiving system and IDoc status are returned within seconds.
    However, for one R/3 platform it was always taking about 30 minutes until the IDoc number and IDoc status were returned. The status bar displays that the IDOC_DATE_TIME_GET function module is executed.
    Now it runs for over one hour until it stops with a TIME LIMIT EXCEEDED error message and no IDoc numbers and status is returned any more. What needs to be corrected to speed up IDoc tracking for this particular system?
    Regards, Tanja

    Not sure if this would help, but this link speaks of how to bypass time limit exceeded
    http://www.erpgenie.com/abaptips/content/view/490/62/

  • Time Limit Exceeded in File - java- IDOC

    Hello,
    I have an interface which reads a text file in XI and uses a java mapping to produce IDOCs in an R3 system synchronously, the interface was running fine for more than 2 years . Since the text file is larger than 20 MB, we are splitting into small text files (2mb each) for easier processing. While processing, each file will hold the outbound queue (SMQ2) until it gets completed. after 2 years of using this interface, it started giving errors in the queue (Time Limit Exceeded) for files larger than 1mb.
    Any hint ??

    Swarup,
    increasing the RFC adapter time out from the visual admin has solve the problem,
    thank you for that.
    but what I was looking for is a way to find out what could be the root cause, since it was running 2 years with (300000 ms time out) without a problem. Now I must increase this time out which mean my system is not performing well!
    Agasthuri,
    as I mentioned, it was running fine with 2mb, now even 1mb cannot be proccessed,
    Thanks again.

  • Problems with the time limit in PCI6602

    Hi,
         I am using a counter-timer PCI-6602 to scan a sample.
        I’m using Counter0  as a pulse generator to generate a GATE signal and Counter1 as a counter, and the mode is event counting.
    J'd like to have a more precise definition about "time limit". If I used a GATE frecuency of 1KHz (1ms integration time) and a SOURCE frecuency of 10KHz with a time limit of 1sec, I measured1000 times a 10. That’s OK but that also means that I need to be 1 sec at each position!!!! And this is a lot of time!!! If I changed the time limit form 1sec to a fraction of a sec (300 ms for example) it doesn’t work. Why?
    Could anybody help me! Thanks,
    Lala

    Lala,
    What exactly do you mean by "I need to be 1 sec at each position"? Are you trying to interface with quadrature encoders? It is possible to perform a buffered period measurement which will sample the position once per second (hardware-timed). It also sounds like you are using Traditional NI-DAQ. Would it be possible to upgrade to NI-DAQmx? This API is recommended for new designs. Also, are you using LabVIEW or a text-based language. In the LabVIEW Example Finder (Help->Find Examples), search under "Hardware Input and Output->DAQmx->Counter Measurements->Position" for the Meas Angular Position-Buffered-Cont-Ext Clk.vi example. You can also use another counter to clock this buffered measurement. If this does not sound like what you are trying to accomplish, please let me know a bit more about your hardware and what you intend to do with it. I'm sure I could then recommend a better method.
    Hope this helps,
    Ryan Verret
    Product Marketing Engineer
    Signal Generators
    National Instruments

  • DNL_CUST_ADDR "SYSFAIL" with time limit exceeded

    Hi Experts,
    i hope you can help here.
    We set up a new connection between a CRM and an ECC.
    Everything worked fine until we started the initial customizing load.
    All customizing objects went through, besides DNL_CUST_ADDR.
    It stopped in the Inbound Queue  of the CRM with error message "Sysfail" in Detail
    "Time limit exceeded".
    The Solution is not note 873918, we implemented it and it still doesn´t
    work.
    Ahead thank you very much.
    Regards
    Matthias Reich

    Hi Matthias,
       You can try any of the following things.
       Before starting the initial load of this object, change the block size in DNL_CUST_ADDR object to 50. Here delete the current queue and reinitiate the load  OR
       If you don't want to delete the existing queue, basis can increase the GUI maximum time. For this they need to change the parameter rdisp/max_wprun_time. You can see the current max time by executing the program RSPARAM. After doing this setting, you can unlock the queue.
    //Bhanu

  • Need Help with "ldap_search: Administrative limit exceeded" issue

    Hi,
    I recently created an index for an attribute called abcSmDisableFlag. When i perform an Ldapsearch using an application owners binddn, 10 entires are returned before i get the error: ldap_search: Administrative limit exceeded. When I use the Directory Manager I do not get this error while the same 10 entries are returned.
    I have analyzed the error and access logs and i think the problem is with the index (notes=U). I performed a reindex on the attribute but it din't work.
    Below are the details i gathered from
    error log:
    [20/Sep/2010:15:04:59 -0400] - WARNING<20805> - Backend Database - conn=1189378 op=1 msgId=2 - search is not indexed base='ou=customers,o=abc
    enterprises,c=us,dc=abc,dc=net' filter='(&(objectClass=abcIdentity)(abcIdmDeleteDate<=2010-09-20)(!(abcSmDisabledFlag=1)))' scope='sub'
    access log:
    [20/Sep/2010:15:04:59 -0400] conn=1189378 op=-1 msgId=-1 - fd=536 slot=536 LDAP connection from UserIP to ServerIP
    [20/Sep/2010:15:04:59 -0400] conn=1189378 op=0 msgId=1 - BIND dn="cn=xyzservices,ou=appid,dc=abc,dc=net" method=128 version=3
    [20/Sep/2010:15:04:59 -0400] conn=1189378 op=0 msgId=1 - RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0.001190 dn="cn=xyzservices,ou=appid,dc=abc,dc=net"
    [20/Sep/2010:15:04:59 -0400] conn=1189378 op=1 msgId=2 - SRCH base="ou=customers,o=abc enterprises,c=us,dc=abc,dc=net" scope=2 filter="(&
    (objectClass=abcIdentity)(abcIdmDeleteDate<=2010-09-20)(!(abcSmDisabledFlag=1)))" attrs=ALL
    [20/Sep/2010:15:05:03 -0400] conn=1189378 op=1 msgId=2 - RESULT err=11 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=4.604440 notes=U
    I have indexed both abcIdmDeleteDate and abcSmDisabledFlag with a presence and equality index.
    I am using Sun Directory Server 6.2. All the nsslapd limits are at Default value and I am not supposed to increase those values.
    I will be very grateful if anyone can kindly share ideas/solutions on this issue and help me out.
    Thanks!!

    I don't know if your issue has been resolved but two things i see here:
    1 - you should not be on 6.2, move to 6.3 or 7.
    2 - your filter is the answer, when you use a filter of "(&(objectclass=abcIdentity)(abcIdmDeleteDate<=2010-09-16)("\!"(abcSmDisabledFlag=1)))", DSEE takes the 1st part of your filter, in your case objectclass=abcIdentity, and does a search on it. Then after retrieving all entries it checks all that have an abcSmDisableFlag <=2010-09-16 and finally out of the remaining entries it will check which do not have an abcSmDisableFlag=1.
    The search on objectClass is resulting in an unindexed search, apparently. What you need to do is alter the order of your attributes in your search filter and have objectClass at the end.
    I hope this makes sense and helps.

  • IDoc basic type FIDCCH01 with error F5866

    Iu2019m trying to create an iDoc with basic type FIDCCH01 and message type FIDCCH type.  Iu2019m getting error F5866 u201CWhen calling up the interface to financial accounting, no entry was made in the transfer parameter "Application key" when I process the idoc.  I do not see an idoc value by this name.  What am I missing in my config?
    Thanks,
    Stan

    Stan,
    First, I'd like to mention that you determine where the error message F5866 is used by entering this message in transaction SE91 and pressing the where-used function.  This won't show you any of the dynamic message calls, but it does indicate that function modules FI_DOCUMENT_CHANGE and FI_DOCUMENT_CHECK_CHANGE are both possible origins for the message you received.  These function modules are part of the FI Interface which I am assuming is called during the processing of your IDoc. 
    ACCHD-AWREF is one of the values passed to the FI Interface function modules, and message F5866 is returned when that field is blank.  This is why I assume that the IDoc in question is missing a value for the AWREF field.
    Based on that assumption, I checked the definition for the IDoc type that you mentioned, FIDCCH01, via area menu WEDI.  This IDoc type contains a segment E1FIREF with field AWREF.  You can use transaction WE02 to display the IDoc causing the error and check to see if the actual data for E1FIREF-AWREF is blank (ultimately leading to the blank ACCHD-AWREF value and error F5866).
    Cheers,
    Jamie

  • Test with no time limit

    We administer a monthly open-book quiz, and the student is allowed 5 days to complete it.
    Any way to implement this is Captivate without an LMS?

    SP2 should allow longer records.  Are you sure it is SP2?
    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=27870

  • Please HELP with ORA-19809: limit exceeded for recovery files

    Hi Gurus,
    I am not a DBA but a developer. Today my Oracle database 11g on my PC will not open and I am getting the errors,
    ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
    ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist
    I checked my alert logs and found these errors,
    Errors in file c:\oracle\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_2144.trc:
    ORA-19809: limit exceeded for recovery files
    ORA-19804: cannot reclaim 41072128 bytes disk space from 4039114752 limit
    ARCH: Error 19809 Creating archive log file to 'C:\ORACLE\FLASH_RECOVERY_AREA\ORCL\ARCHIVELOG\2011_04_08\O1_MF_1_120_%U_.ARC'
    Errors in file c:\oracle\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_2144.trc:
    ORA-16038: log 3 sequence# 120 cannot be archived
    ORA-19809: limit exceeded for recovery files
    ORA-00312: online log 3 thread 1: 'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO03.LOG'
    USER (ospid: 2144): terminating the instance due to error 16038
    Instance terminated by USER, pid = 2144
    So I started searching for answers on this forum and found a suggestion using RMAN to delete all the archive logs,
    RMAN> connect target sys/*******
    RMAN> delete archivelog all;
    RMAN>crosscheck archivelog all;
    But I get these errors in RMAN,
    using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
    RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
    RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
    RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
    RMAN-03002: failure of delete command at 04/08/2011 11:20:58
    RMAN-06403: could not obtain a fully authorized session
    ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
    ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist
    So, please help me: How do I fix this problem since I can't start the instance?
    Thank you.
    Ben

    You need to increase the FRA by changing the parameter DB_RECOVERY_FILE_DEST_SIZE. Create a parameter file while being connected as Sys user and issue,
    sql>create pfile from spfile;It would create the pfile in the Oracle_Home/database folder. Edit that file and increase the parameter to a larger size-like double of it's current value. Save the file and issue,
    sql>startup pfile=<your location of the file>HTH
    Aman....

  • Two idocs with same idoc number in idx5

    We are using an idoc to file scenario where idocs are bundled using bpm and posted to ftp. here the issue is we are getting two idocs with same idoc number in idx5. due to which the file in ftp is getting overwritten.
    Could anyone suggest me what to do in this regard.

    Hi,
    >>>check your sender system is sending same IDoc twice ?
    if you send the same IDOC twice they both get different numbers as IDOC number is taken from the IDOC num range
    unless you're able to send the same IDOC twice with the same IDOC num somehow
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • Issues in IDoc Sender Scenario:IDoc  with errors added

    Hi all
             Am working on an IDoc to JDBC scenario. In R/3 system, I have created distribution model, partner profile, RFC destination and port.The IDoc is generated and is sent to XI successfully. But in XI , there is no entry in SXI_MONITOR for this (unfortunately IDX5 is not available in the XI server! ;as of now). Instead an entry is made in WE05 and WE02 with stautus 56(IDoc with errors added). In the status record:
    status 56 : External segment name E2KOMG003 cannot be interpreted
    status 60 : Basic IDoc type COND_A03 could not be found.
    And the segments displayed in data record  are different from the segments in the data record of the IDoc generated at R/3. (say for E1KOMG at R/3, E2KOMG003 in XI).Earlier the flow was working fine and the DB table was updated successfully. And the entire stuff is believed to be 'unmodified' .
    Would any one help in resolving the issue.
    Thanks,
    Chilanka

    Hi,
    >>>>I have created partenr profile in R/3.Need I create a partner profile in XI for R/3 system?
    no you cannot create any partner profiles in XI
    for more about IDOC configuration in XI check :
    <a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/10/11/xi-new-book-mastering-idoc-business-scenarios-with-sap-xi"><b>Mastering IDoc Business Scenarios with SAP XI</b></a>
    Regards,
    michal
    <a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

  • 3 Messages getting struck in SMQ2 at same time with difference in seconds

    Hi all,
    Three  EOIO messages with Queue name QBTJ.......................(same Queue id  for 3days)
    that is day1 QBTJ(message (a)  queue id=day2 QBTJ  queue id=day3 QBTJ  queue id
    day1 QBTJ(message (b)  queue id=day2 QBTJ  queue id=day3 QBTJ  queue id
    day1 QBTJ(message (c)  queue id=day2 QBTJ  queue id=day3 QBTJ  queue id
    .These are getting struck in smq2 at same times (compared the timings 3 days).the time at which these messages are getting struck are same with the difference in seconds.
    Other than these 3 different times ,these messages are moving with out strucking in SMQ2.
    I have two questions here
    1)what could be the reason for only these three messages are getting struck in smq2
    2)is there any parameter which could be set in SXMB_ABMIN to unlock the queue automatically with out going to smq2 and manually unlocking.
    Please do not send nonrelavent blogs
    Thanks,
    Srinivasa

    Hello,
    you can schedule the report RSQIWKEX in your XI system. This report does automatically unlock all queues.
    See the blog for more details.
    regards,
    Björn

  • IDoc-to-File scenario with external Partner ... PCK necessary?

    Hi all,
    I have a question concerning to a IDoc-to-File Scenario with an external Partner. Here is a short Description of the Scenario:
    The SAP ERP System creates an IDoc which should be send to the SAP Integration Server. The Integration Server respectively the IDoc-Adapter transform the IDoc in IDoc-XML. The Integration Server executes a Mapping and so on. In the final step the Integration Server should send the XML-File to a FTP Server in New York (external Partner) with the File/FTP-Adapter.
    Have I to install the Partner Connectivity Kit at a Server in New York or is it working without the PCK? Which are my possibilities?
    Thanks for your help
    with kind regards
    Christopher

    Hello,
    If the FTP server has connectivity to XI and if the
    port is open XI can directly do the FTP using File
    Adapter.
    Thanks,
    Himadri
    Hi,
    thanks for your quick answer.
    What means "connectivity to XI"? Our SAP-Environment is in Germany and the FTP-Server is in New York. Is it enough to open the port in the firewall?
    Thanks for your answer
    Christopher Kühn

Maybe you are looking for