Message getting stuck in XBQO queue - Time limit exceeded

Hi All,
We have a BPM scenario in our project (on PI 7.0 SP18), where bundle of PEXR2002 Payment IDocs are received as a single flat file. This file is then consumed by the BPM, to split the message into multiple payments using Java Mapping.
However, when we get an IDoc file of size greater than 5 MB (more than 500 IDocs), the message gets stuck in XBQO queue and eventually giving a SYSFAIL with the message "Time limit exceeded". Could you please let us know if you have encountered a similar issue and are aware of a possible solution.
Any pointers to this will be really appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
ROSIE SASIDHARAN

H Rosie,
1) Goto SXMB_ADM-> Integration Engine Configuration->Parameter EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT->possible values 0 - 2,097,151 (KB)
The parameter EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT enables serial processing of messages of a particular size. This applies for messages with the quality of service Exactly Once (EO). If the message is larger than the parameter value, the message is processed in a separate queue.
2) Goto SXMB_ADM-> Integration Engine Configuration->Parameter HTTP_TIMEOUT->possible values n Seconds, where n is a whole number.
The parameter Specifies the timeout for HTTP connections (time between two data packages at line level). This value overrides the system profile parameter icm/server_port_n (for example, icm/server_port_0 : PROT=HTTP, PORT=50044, TIMEOUT=900). If you do not set the parameter HTTP_TIMEOUT or if you set the parameter to 0, then the setting for the system profile parameter is used.
See SAP Note 335162 for sysfail issue....
Hope these will help u....
Regds,
Pinangshuk.

Similar Messages

Messages getting stuck in QRFC Queue

Hi,
Today I noticed that a message had gotten stuck with the status "Sheduled for Outbound Processing" (scenario IDOC->XI->File), XI 3.0 SP11.
This in turn had the effect that the whole QRFC queue got stuck, and all following messages got stuck with status "Sheduled".
I had to remove the first message from the queue manually so that XI could start to purge the other messages from the queue.
What could be the reason for the first messages getting stuck with this status ("Sheduled for Outbound Processing")?
The message was very small, just a couple of lines. One thing that comes into mind, is that XI received 4 IDOCS for the same interface, within one second. These 4 messages were assigned to different queues, but one of them got stuck. Could there be problems with XI when several messages arrive on the same interface within a very short time?
Is it possible to use Alerts to detect this kind of problem in the future? As I have understood, Alerts only handle XI "errors", but according to XI, this message did not have an "error status", it just had the status "Sheduled for Outbound processing"..
Thanks for any help,
Hans

Hi,
If the message got struck in Queue, you try to activate the queues in smq2 to reprocess the data instead of deleting it. This is the final solution. But you should able to see a dump in ST22 for this problem.
thanks,
sasi

Time Limit exceeded Error while updating huge number of records in MARC

Hi experts,
I have a interface requirement in which third party system will send a big file say.. 3 to 4MB file into SAP. in proxy we
used BAPI BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA to save the material/plant data. Now, because of huge amount of data the SAP Queues are
getting blocked and causing the time limit exceeded issues. As the BAPI can update single material at time, it will be called as many materials
as we want to update.
Below is the part of code in my proxy
Call the BAPI update the safety stock Value.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA'
      EXPORTING
        headdata                    = gs_headdata
        CLIENTDATA                  =
        CLIENTDATAX                 =
       plantdata                   = gs_plantdata
       plantdatax                  = gs_plantdatax
       IMPORTING
          return              = ls_return.
    IF ls_return-type <> 'S'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_ROLLBACK'.
      MOVE ls_return-message TO lv_message.
Populate the error table and process next record.
      CALL METHOD me->populate_error
        EXPORTING
          message = lv_message.
      CONTINUE.
    ENDIF.
Can any one please let me know what could be the best possible approach for this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Jitender
Hi experts,
I have a interface requirement in which third party system will send a big file say.. 3 to 4MB file into SAP. in proxy we
used BAPI BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA to save the material/plant data. Now, because of huge amount of data the SAP Queues are
getting blocked and causing the time limit exceeded issues. As the BAPI can update single material at time, it will be called as many materials
as we want to update.
Below is the part of code in my proxy
Call the BAPI update the safety stock Value.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA'
      EXPORTING
        headdata                    = gs_headdata
        CLIENTDATA                  =
        CLIENTDATAX                 =
       plantdata                   = gs_plantdata
       plantdatax                  = gs_plantdatax
       IMPORTING
          return              = ls_return.
    IF ls_return-type <> 'S'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_ROLLBACK'.
      MOVE ls_return-message TO lv_message.
Populate the error table and process next record.
      CALL METHOD me->populate_error
        EXPORTING
          message = lv_message.
      CONTINUE.
    ENDIF.
Can any one please let me know what could be the best possible approach for this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Jitender

Hi Raju,
Use the following routine to get fiscal year/period using calday.
*Data definition:
DATA: l_Arg1 TYPE RSFISCPER ,
      l_Arg2 TYPE RSFO_DATE ,
      l_Arg3 TYPE T009B-PERIV .
*Calculation:
l_Arg2 = TRAN_STRUCTURE-POST_DATE. (<b> This is the date that u have to give</b>)
l_Arg3 = 'V3'.
CALL METHOD CL_RSAR_FUNCTION=>DATE_FISCPER(
EXPORTING I_DATE = l_Arg2
            I_PER = l_Arg3
IMPORTING E_FISCPER = l_Arg1 ).
RESULT = l_Arg1 .
Hope it will sove ur problem....!
Please Assign points.......
Best Regards,
SG

Time Limit Exceeded in File - java- IDOC

Hello,
I have an interface which reads a text file in XI and uses a java mapping to produce IDOCs in an R3 system synchronously, the interface was running fine for more than 2 years . Since the text file is larger than 20 MB, we are splitting into small text files (2mb each) for easier processing. While processing, each file will hold the outbound queue (SMQ2) until it gets completed. after 2 years of using this interface, it started giving errors in the queue (Time Limit Exceeded) for files larger than 1mb.
Any hint ??

Swarup,
increasing the RFC adapter time out from the visual admin has solve the problem,
thank you for that.
but what I was looking for is a way to find out what could be the root cause, since it was running 2 years with (300000 ms time out) without a problem. Now I must increase this time out which mean my system is not performing well!
Agasthuri,
as I mentioned, it was running fine with 2mb, now even 1mb cannot be proccessed,
Thanks again.

Program terminated: Time limit exceeded, ABAP performance, max_wprun_time

Hi,
I am running an ABAP program, and I get the following short dump:
Time limit exceeded. The program has exceeded the maximum permitted runtime and has therefore been terminated. After a certain time, the program terminates to free the work processfor other users who are waiting. This is to stop work processes being blocked for too long by
- Endless loops (DO, WHILE, ...),
- Database acceses with large result sets,
- Database accesses without an apporpriate index (full table scan)
- database accesses producing an excessively large result set,
The maximum runtime of a program is set by the profile parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time". The current setting is 10000 seconds. After this, the system gives the program a second chance. During the first half (>= 10000 seconds), a call that is blocking the work process (such as a long-running SQLstatement) can occur. While the statement is being processed, the database layer will not allow it to be interrupted. However, to stop the program terminating immediately after the statement has been successfully processed, the system gives it another 10000 seconds. Hence the maximum runtime of a program is at least twice the value of the system profile parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time".
Last error logged in SAP kernel
Component............ "NI (network interface)"
Place................ "SAP-Dispatcher ok1a11cs_P06_00 on host ok1a11e0"
Version.............. 34
Error code........... "-6"
Error text........... "connection to partner broken"
Description.......... "NiPRead"
System call.......... "recv"
Module............... "niuxi.c"
Line................. 1186
Long-running programs should be started as background jobs. If this is not possible, you can increase the value of the system profile parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time".
Program cannot be started as a background job. We have now identified two options to solve the problem:
- Increase the value of the system profile parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time"
- Improve the performance of the following SELECT statement in the program:
SELECT ps_psp_pnr ebeln ebelp zekkn sakto FROM ekkn
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_ekkn
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN p_lt_proj
WHERE ps_psp_pnr = p_lt_proj-pspnr
AND ps_psp_pnr > 0.
In EKKN we have 200 000 entries.
Is there any other options we could try?
Regards,
Jarmo

Thanks for your help, this problem seems to be quite challenging...
In EKKN we have 200 000 entries. 199 999 entries have value of 00000000 in column ps_psp_pnr, and only one has a value which identifies a WBS element.
I believe the problem is that there isn't any WBS element in PRPS which has the value of 00000000. I guess that is the reason why EKKN is read sequantially.
I also tried this one, but it doesn't help at all. Before the SELECT statement is executed, there are 594 entries in internal table p_lt_proj_sel:
DATA p_lt_proj_sel LIKE p_lt_proj OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
p_lt_proj_sel[] = p_lt_proj[].
DELETE p_lt_proj_sel WHERE pspnr = 0.
SORT p_lt_proj_sel by pspnr.
SELECT ps_psp_pnr ebeln ebelp zekkn sakto FROM ekkn
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_ekkn
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN p_lt_proj_sel
WHERE ps_psp_pnr = p_lt_proj_sel-pspnr.
I also checked that the index P in EKKN is active.
Can I somehow force the optimizer to use the index?
Regards,
Jarmo

JMS Messages getting stuck in queues

Hi,
I am facing this peculiar issue with queue messages not getting picked up.
Application Architecture: There is 1 JMS queue ( which resides in WLDomain1 with in a Unix Box) and there are 2 windows boxes having 2 weblogic domains each with 3 instances of MDB deployed on each of the domains. So total of 12 consumers (2 Box * 2 Domain * 3 Instances of MDB) listens to the JMS queue.
Issue: After bringing everything up I am able to see 12 consumer count listening to the queue. But when I run the application which writes total of 13 messages in the queue only 7 of them are getting processed and 6 messages are always getting stuck in the queues. Interestingly this 7 messages are mostly getting processed by consumers with in the same windows box. And the selection of windows box is completely random. To confirm whether both the windows boxes are configured fine I tried to test them individually and it works fine individually, the problem happens only if I bring up both the boxes together.
Another observation is, if I bring down the non working domains, the pending messages start getting processed by the working domains. It gives an impression that the non working domains seem to lock the messages for processing but doesn't actually process it. Only when I bring down the domains it releases this lock.
Below is the JMS Life cycle events I captured from log files :
1. Start domain1 in WIN Box1
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040304> <783400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040309> <239900> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040313> <2100> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <> <>
2. Start domain2 in WIN Box 1
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095403> <38600> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095407> <335400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095410> <997700> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <> <>
3. Start domain1 in WIN Box 2
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172061> <316500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session80.consumer82)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172066> <324300> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session83.consumer85)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172072> <757000> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session86.consumer88)> <> <>
4. Start domain2 in WIN Box 2
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214000> <142800> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session90.consumer92)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214005> <38200> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session93.consumer95)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214009> <22400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session96.consumer98)> <> <>
At this point console shows 12 consumers listening the queue which is absolutely fine.
5. Run application
--Message Production
This produces 13 messages ( I have not pasted the complete log)
-- Message Consumption ( Only 7 messages are consumed)
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:05 PM CST> <> <> <1259114405953> <576400> <ID:<1047832.1259114392542.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114392542</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410091> <310100> <ID:<1047832.1259114393181.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393181</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410130> <364600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400626.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400626</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410134> <540700> <ID:<1047832.1259114393125.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393125</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410137> <632400> <ID:<1047832.1259114393128.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393128</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114412026> <984200> <ID:<1047832.1259114393123.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393123</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:16 PM CST> <> <> <1259114416045> <41800> <ID:<1047832.1259114400005.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400005</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
6. At this point Admin Consol shows 6 messages pending in the queue
and From consumer numbers it is evident that consumers in WIN Box2 domains have not processed any messages
Now if I stop server in WIN Box2 Domain1, WIN Box1 picks up the messages instantely
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202343> <897600> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session80.consumer82)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202346> <421900> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session83.consumer85)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202379> <582300> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session86.consumer88)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:24 PM CST> <> <> <1259115204888> <4600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400029.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400029</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:32 PM CST> <> <> <1259115212820> <256700> <ID:<1047832.1259114400258.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400258</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:43 PM CST> <> <> <1259115223579> <280600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400032.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400032</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
7. At this poing Admin Consol shows 3 messages pending in the queue
Now if I stop server in WIN Box2 Domain2, the remaining 3 gets processed
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:08 PM CST> <> <> <1259115368998> <193400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session90.consumer92)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:08 PM CST> <> <> <1259115369000> <885500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session93.consumer95)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:09 PM CST> <> <> <1259115369002> <902500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session96.consumer98)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:25 PM CST> <> <> <1259115385151> <123700> <ID:<1047832.1259114400324.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400324</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:29 PM CST> <> <> <1259115389660> <836600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400535.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400535</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:37 PM CST> <> <> <1259115397823> <610200> <ID:<1047832.1259114400432.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400432</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
Kindly throw some light on this issue. Also do let me know if you need any more specific details about this.
Thanks,
Abhijeet
Edited by: user5240164 on Nov 25, 2009 11:35 AM
Edited by: user5240164 on Nov 28, 2009 1:21 PM

Hi,
The problem may be conflicting names in your configuration. To ensure proper operation of WL Security, JMS, JTA, and JDBC, make sure that (A) each domain has a unique name, and (B) no two WebLogic servers have the same name (even if in two different domains).
To ensure a more even distribution of messages, either simply send more than a token amount messages (eg, a hundred or so, rather than just 12), or configure a custom connection factory on the domain that hosts the queue, reduce MessagesMaximum on the connection factory to 1, and then modify each MDB to refer to the custom connection factory. The MessagesMaximum setting controls the number of messages that can be pre-pushed (pipelined) to a single asynchronous consumer.
For more information see "Best Practices for JMS Beginners and Advanced Users" in the latest versions of the JMS admin guide, and "JMS Performance & Tuning Check List" in the WebLogic Performance and Tuning guide.
Tom

Messages getting stuck in Queue

Hi All,
In my scenario data is coming from database into XI and creating a file in SAP. The messages are getting stuck in the Queue and in message monitoring the status is showing as 'waiting'. Earlier the messages were getting successfully processed but system was running slow for the past two days. Is this because of system speed or some data issue?
For testing pupose I have deleted the old messages from Smq2 and tried but every new message is getting stuck in the queue. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Aparna

Please check the following blog :
/people/stefan.grube/blog/2006/04/27/how-to-deal-with-stuck-eoio-messages-in-the-xi-30-adapter-framework
try cancelling oldest messages, this should unblock queue
Regards,
Jamal

From time to time, my outgoing mail messages get stuck in the "outbox". I'm having trouble resolving the problem.

From time to time, my outgoing mail messages get stuck in the "outbox". I'm having trouble resolving the problem.

I use Comcast. My computer (Mac Air) also uses my iCloud and Me accounts. The message I get back says they are all offline.

Time Limit exceeded error in R & R queue

Hi,
We are getting Time limit exceeded error in the R & R queue when we try to extract the data for a site.
The error is happening with the message SALESDOCGEN_O_W. It is observed that whenever, the timelimit error is encountered, the possible solution is to run the job in the background. But in this case, is there any possibility to run the particular subscription for sales document in the background.
Any pointers on this would be of great help.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Rasmi.

Hi Rasmi
I suppose that the usual answer would be to increase the timeout for the R&R queue.
We have increased the timeout on ours to 60 mins and that takes care of just about everything.
The other thing to check would be the volume of data that is going to each site for SALESDOCGEN_O_W. These are pretty big BDOCs and the sales force will not thank you for huge contranns time
If you have a subscription for sales documents by business patrner, then it is worth seeing if the business partner subscription could be made more intelligent to fit your needs
Regards
James

Mails to 1 particular user is getting bounced - Command time limit exceeded

I've about 100 mail clients. Since yesterday morning, I've had one user whose incoming emails have been getting bounced. I've run a "mailbfr -m user" w/o success. The server is current on updates and has been restarted. All other users are functioning correctly. Notes:
-IMAP account
-This user has a 4GB Sent folder. All other folders are under 2GB.
-This user has recently starting syncing Notes from a Blackberry.
THE SMTP LOG:
Oct 7 08:26:52 myserver postfix/pipe[488]: D1BCE11CE230: to=<[email protected]>, relay=cyrus, delay=1000, delays=0.01/0/0/1000, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command time limit exceeded: "/usr/bin/cyrus/bin/deliver")
A PORTION OF THE BOUNCE EMAIL SENT TO SENDER:
This is the mail system at host myserver.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<[email protected]>: Command time limit exceeded:
"/usr/bin/cyrus/bin/deliver"
Reporting-MTA: dns; myserver.com
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: AD79711CE1DD
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [email protected]
Arrival-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 08:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected]
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Diagnostic-Code: x-unix; internal software error
Any help?

Solved. This person was in-process of moving Blackberry notes to the imap account. There was an interruption during the transfer phase and the server's Notes folder became bad somehow. When Mailbfr hit that particular folder, it stopped the rebuild process.
I removed the Notes folder and ran Mailbfr again. The Notes folder was recreated and the rebuild function completed.
Mail delivery has been restored to this user.

Messages getting stuck in tcp_local Channel

Hi All
Version
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004)
libimta.so 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built 12:52:04, Jun 24 2004)
SunOS dakota 5.9 Generic_112233-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440
Background
In the last week we've been experiencing problems with outgoing messages getting stuck in our tcp_local channel. They can stay for up to 4 hours before dequeuing. We plan to install Patch 116568 which is the latest core patch for our version of the Messaging Server.
To date we haven't experienced any DNS problems and have not made any configuration changes.
However I was just wondering if anyone had come across this type of problem before? We're hoping the patch will resolve the issue but would be interested in other alternatives.
Thanks in advance
Paul

You'll have to do more research before I can offer help. . .
It's not unusual for some messages to be retried, and depending on the destination, that may take a while.
Some outside domains are always slow. If you have many messages queued for such outside domains, they can involve the whole server, and cause mails to queue up behind them.
Many installations create a new channel, such as, "tcp_slow", and use rewrite rules to move messages addressed to these domains (aol, hotmail, earthlink, etc.) into this separate channel. You can "tune" that channel differently, and messages there won't block tcp_local.

ReadString() get time limit exceed to complete operation error

I have a device name Time Electronics 5075. I am trying to use the SimpleReadWrite.2010 in National Instruments\NI-488.2\Examples\DotNET4.0\SimpleReadWrite\cs to comunicate with the device.
I can open the connection and send commands to the device by using this code
device = new Device((int)boardIdNumericUpDown.Value,(byte)primaryAddressNumericUpDown.Value,(byte)currentSecondaryAddress);
device.IOTimeout = TimeoutValue.T100s;
device.Write("X0/A1/F0{13}");
But I am stuck at
stringReadTextBox.Text = device.ReadString();
I get the error "Time limit exceeded to complete operation."
I don't know exactly should I add
device.Write("T/D{13}");
before the device.ReadString() or not. But I get the same error for both cases.
Some info: Visual Studio 2010, Measurement Studio 2013, NI.488.2, Windows 7 Pro
Any idea?

Thank you Curt_C,
I have attached the screen capture of NI IO Trace. I just open the session, send two commands T\n and D\n to the device and readstring. The red one are errors on reading. The last one is close session.
I think \n is the correct terminator. It works with most of commands, just get stuck with ReadString.
Kind regards,
Thang
PS: I also attached GPIB Interface Properties for more info
Attachments:
NI IO Trace_01.png ‏54 KB
GPIB Interface Properties.png ‏54 KB

Messages getting stuck in SMQ2

Messages get stuck in SMQ2 with the Error msg "SQL error on database occurred when accessing a table".
This is happening on PI system 7.11 SP04 with Max DB version 7.7.06.07.
This typically happens when sending messages from one BPM to another although it has more of a random pattern.
A corresponding dump is also seen in ST22.
The dump details are as below:
Runtime error : DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR
Exception : CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB
Database error text : Invalid numeric value for parameter/column (10)
Internal call code : "[RSQL/UPDT/SWFRXIHDR ]"
Any help is highly appreciated in resolving this issue.
Regards,
Murali Narayanan

> The dump details are as below:
> Runtime error : DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR
> Exception : CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB
> Database error text : Invalid numeric value for parameter/column (10)
I would update the kernel (plus the database interface library lib_dbsl) to the latest patchlevels and try again. If the error persists I'd upgrade the database to the latest patchlevel. If it still doesn't work I'd open an OSS call (BC-DB-SDB).
Markus

Phone gets stuck most of the time after ios7 update

phone gets stuck most of the time after ios7 update

Hey Siddh.s!
Here is an article that will help you troubleshoot this issue with your Wi-Fi connections:
iOS: Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1398
Thanks for using the Apple Support Communities. Have a good one!
-Braden

Messages gets stuck up in active state

Hi ,
In our production environment, we are facing strange issues for the past 1 week.
Issue 1:
Messages gets stuck up in active state. In our message tracking mechanism ,the status is successfully sent to destination party. The message should not hold up in active state in first place?
If we restart the Host instance, it is creating duplicate and processing it which is creating misssing ICR issue.
Per day message flow-200 messages
Please suggest ?
Kind Regards,
Giri.a
girishkumar.a

Hi Girish,
I believe OFTP adapter is not native adapter(in box) for BizTalk Server.
So, is there any logging mechanism in OFTP adapter?
Also, can we connect to the FTP server using some other tool like Filezilla etc. If other 3rd party products are also not able to connect to this server then we can say that its not a BizTalk issue.
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

Message getting stuck in XBQO queue - Time limit exceeded

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for