Time to take action

hai to every one.
i developed application using adaptive webservice model .
here initial it get immidaiate response when any task from back end.
ex: there is a methpd to get the number from back end.
get number mathod.
now the problem is when ever i triger the "getnumber" action.
its take too much time , that is 4 min its taking .
for this inot able to under stand the problem .
to get immidaite reply , what we need to do.
if any one has know about this . tell me

hi
If you have implemented any loop, then check it out , may be where it is getting stuck
i,e why it is taking that much of time .
Aslo it could be reasion that it may getting huge amount of records
Thanks

Similar Messages

Your information has been sent to our customer service department. We will review your case (est. time 72 hours) and take action as necessary.

''locking this thread as it is not a Firefox support issue''
Your information has been sent to our customer service department. We will review your case (est. time 72 hours) and take action as necessary.
== URL of affected sites ==
http://

Try getting help from Facebook. Those aren't Firefox support issues.

What should be take action against following sql tuning report.

Hi
what should be take action against following sql tuning report.
SQL ID : fn3mt5dvm7fba
SQL Text : SELECT * FROM (select
     to_number(ow.waybl_no) waybl_no,ow.id wb_id,
     To_Number(ogp.gp_no) gp_no,
     To_Number(ots.trip_sht_no) trip_sht_no,
     otr.nm,
     ots.gty_br_mast_id,
     DECODE(otr.sign_recd,'1','YES','NO') Sign_Recd,
     DECODE(otr.stamped,'1','YES','NO') Stamped,
     otr.dlvry_dt dlvry_dt,
     otr.tel_no,
     --otr.remarks,
     Decode(otr.comments, NULL,'','Yes') remarks,
     otr.id ID,ops_safex_utl.get_br_nm(to_number(ow.bkg_br_mast_id))
book_br,
     ow.pick_dt book_date
from
     ops_ts_reconsile otr,
     ops_pultd_wb_dtls opuwd,
     ops_trip_sht ots,
     ops_waybl ow,
     ops_ultd_wb_dtls ouwd,
     ops_gate_pass ogp
where
     otr.trip_sht_id=ots.id and
     otr.pultd_wb_dtls_id=opuwd.id and
     opuwd.ultd_wb_dtls_id=ouwd.id and
     ouwd.gate_pass_id=ogp.id and
     opuwd.waybl_id=ow.id and
     otr.status_lid=157 and
     ots.gty_br_mast_id = (:br_Id) and
     (otr.dlvry_dt = :searchDate OR :searchDate IS NULL) and
     otr.note_prpd = 'N' and otr.pod_recd = '1' and
     not exists (select TS_RECONSILE_ID from OPS_POD_FRWD_NOTE_DTLS
where TS_RECONSILE_ID = otr.id)
union
select
     to_number(ow.waybl_no) waybl_no, ow.id wb_id,
     To_Number(ogp.gp_no) gp_no,
     null trip_sht_no,
     ogr.nm,
     ogp.dlvry_br_mast_id,
     DECODE(ogr.sign_recd,'Y','YES','NO') Sign_Recd,
     DECODE(ogr.stamped,'Y','YES','NO') Stamped,
     ogr.dlvry_dt dlvry_dt,
     ogr.tel_no,
     --ogr.remarks,
     Decode(ogr.comments, NULL,'', 'Yes') remarks,
     ogr.id ID,ops_safex_utl.get_br_nm(to_number(ow.bkg_br_mast_id))
book_br,
     ow.pick_dt book_date
from
     ops_gp_reconcile ogr,
     ops_gate_pass ogp,
     ops_waybl ow
where
     ogr.gp_id=ogp.id and
     ogp.waybl_id=ow.id and
     ogp.dlvry_br_mast_id = (:br_Id) and
     (ogr.dlvry_dt = :searchDate) and
     ogr.note_prpd = 'N' and ogr.pod_recd = 'Y' and
     not exists (select GP_RECONSILE_ID from OPS_POD_FRWD_NOTE_DTLS
where GP_RECONSILE_ID = ogr.id)) QRSLT ORDER BY trip_sht_no desc
Bind Variables :
1 - (VARCHAR2(32)):37069
2 - (DATE):07/11/2011 00:00:00
3 - (DATE):07/11/2011 00:00:00
4 - (VARCHAR2(32)):37069
5 - (DATE):07/11/2011 00:00:00
FINDINGS SECTION (3 findings)
1- SQL Profile Finding (see explain plans section below)
2 potentially better execution plans were found for this statement. Choose
one of the following SQL profiles to implement.
Recommendation (estimated benefit<=10%)
- Consider accepting the recommended SQL profile.
execute dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name => 'TASK_58643',
task_owner => 'SYS', replace => TRUE);
Recommendation (estimated benefit: 99.15%)
- Consider accepting the recommended SQL profile to use parallel execution
for this statement.
execute dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name => 'TASK_58643',
task_owner => 'SYS', replace => TRUE, profile_type =>DBMS_SQLTUNE.PX_PROFILE);
Executing this query parallel with DOP 128 will improve its response time
99.11% over the SQL profile plan. However, there is some cost in enabling
parallel execution. It will increase the statement's resource consumption by
an estimated 14.56% which may result in a reduction of system throughput.
Also, because these resources are consumed over a much smaller duration, the
response time of concurrent statements might be negatively impacted if
sufficient hardware capacity is not available.
The following data shows some sampled statistics for this SQL from the past
week and projected weekly values when parallel execution is enabled.
Past week sampled statistics for this SQL
Number of executions 17494
Percent of total activity 7.2
Percent of samples with #Active Sessions > 2*CPU .63
Weekly DB time (in sec) 614696.04
Projected statistics with Parallel Execution
Weekly DB time (in sec) 704166.9
2- Restructure SQL finding (see plan 1 in explain plans section)
An expensive "UNION" operation was found at line ID 4 of the execution plan.
Recommendation
- Consider using "UNION ALL" instead of "UNION", if duplicates are allowed
or uniqueness is guaranteed.
3- Alternative Plan Finding
Some alternative execution plans for this statement were found by searching
the system's real-time and historical performance data.
The following table lists these plans ranked by their average elapsed time.
See section "ALTERNATIVE PLANS SECTION" for detailed information on each
plan.
id plan hash last seen elapsed (s) origin note
1 209247904 2011-07-12/10:09:08 7.564 Cursor Cache
2 4029269565 2011-07-12/10:20:21 15.374 Cursor Cache original plan
3 4128886984 2011-07-08/11:30:25 42.426 AWR
4 3695555639 2011-07-12/08:30:30 101.459 AWR
Recommendation
- Consider creating a SQL plan baseline for the plan with the best average
elapsed time.
execute dbms_sqltune.create_sql_plan_baseline(task_name => 'TASK_58643',
owner_name => 'SYS', plan_hash_value => 209247904);
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SECTION
- The optimizer could not merge the view at line ID 3 of the execution plan.
The optimizer cannot merge a view that contains a set operator.
- SQL Profile "SYS_SQLPROF_01306b26f6aa0000" exists for this statement and
was ignored during the tuning process.

afzal wrote:
Hi
what should be take action against following sql tuning report.
<snip>Perhaps no action at all.
You can ALWAYS produce a report that will show "top 5" issues. The question is NOT "do I have an issue reported by a tuning report". Yes you do. Everyone does. Always. Even if you slowest batch job runs in 1.3 seconds and your slowest OLTP transaction completes in 0.0001 second.
The question is "do I have a problem that is serious enough to spend time solving?"
If your average OLTP transaction completes in 3 seconds, how much effort is justified to get a 50% improvement?
How much effort is justified to get that same 50% improvement on transactions that complete in 1.5 seconds? 0.2 seconds?
Beware of Compulsive Tuning Disorder.

Time Machine takes very long time to back up with new large drive

I started using Time Machine on my 17" MBP about a month ago. I was using a 250 GB Samsung drive. When I discovered that TM will back up other external drives (I have several firewire pocket drives), I purchased a 500 GB Cavalry drive with USB 2.0 and eSATA connections. The first backup of my MBP drive (about 85 GB) took several hours (4-6?). I backed up one of my pocket drives (about 60 GB), which took 3-4 hours. Then, when I changed the back-up drive in Time Machine to the new 500 GB drive with the eSATA connection, I stopped it after an hour, because only 2 GB had been backed up. I erased the drive and restarted using the USB connection. It backed up 3 GB in an hour. So, now I'm back to using the original back-up drive. I've performed benchmark tests on all drives (the Samsung 250, Cavalry USB and eSATA 500 GB, and the MBP internal drive) with Xbench. The USB speeds on the Samsung and Cavalry drives came out about the same with a slight edge to the Cavalry drive. The eSATA connection with the Cavalry drive operated at over twice the speed of the USB connections and at about twice the speed of the MBP internal drive (which is a 1.5 Gb/s SATA drive). Basically, I can't figure out why Time Machine takes so incredibly long to back up when I switched to the new drive. Any ideas?
Jeff

It took me 20 hours to backup 32GB out of 65. I don't know why. Using carbon copy clone to download to another backup drive I did it perfectly in about 30 minutes. I expect that those appllications which show applicatiions are at fault and will try later getting rid of apps such as F-10 and pathfinderfor the first download. I have no idea why this is so slow. Everything is so slow.

How Do I Allow a List Item to be assigned to multiple users where only one needs to take action on it?

Hey folks,
Building a ticketing type system and when a ticket is opened, we want it to go to everyone on our team, not just one person. What's the best way to accomplish this and how?
Do we:
1. Make the field blank so it's searchable that way?
2. Can the assigned to field tied to active directory be filled in with more than 1 name where it doesn't require all names to take action on it?
3. Saw people mentioning assigning to a group but then not sure how to create a group (names are tied to active directory) and not sure how to make the workflow allow just one and not all individuals in that group to take action on it.
First step would be for the individual taking action on it to reassign it to themselves, effectively taking it out of the "queue"
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Oh and just a note that SharePoint Designer wasn't set up for us to use BUT we have InfoPath and that is something we can use (go figure lol).
Thanks!

Ben I'll send you the VI
Attachments:
TEST.vi ‏589 KB
TEST.vi ‏59 KB

Can you get a virus on an ipad.I have had this message-Your computer appears to be infected We believe that your computer is infected with malicious software. If you don't take action, you might not be able to connect to the Internet in the future. Learn

Your computer appears to be infected
We believe that your computer is infected with malicious software. If you don't take action, you might not be able to connect to the Internet in the future.
Learn how to remove this software.

No you do not have a virus. That is a standard web popup usually, that tres to get up to download a "removal program". The removal program is the virus or similar.

I have a cracked screen, does anyone know the cost and time it take apple to repair?

I have a cracked screen, does anyone know the cost and time it take apple to repair?

I'd like to know too for my MacBook Pro Retina (Late 2013). Having spoken to some Apple Stores here in Sydney, I need to bring in the computer for them to tell me. I'll know more tomorrow.

What method is used to take action of Enter button in keyboard?

I doing exercise about GUI.
One ex ask me type a number in one JTextField object, press Enter and then another converted number appear in the second JTextField object. This ex are not allowed to use a JButton object. I have no idea about what method to use to take action of pressing Enter. Please help me.
Thank you

Encephalopathic wrote:
codingMonkey wrote:
Interesting. I never knew that.Did you really not know, or are you trying to tell me in a nice way that my answer is full of chit (it's been known to have happened before and I know will happen again)?I really did not know that. It is an interesting little fact that might come in useful someday. :)

How much room does Time Machine take

I have a Macbook Pro with 120GB HD. I wanted to know how big of an external HD I need for Time Machine. I also want to know if I can use it as a HD for large files (imovies) and have that separate from the Time Machine application.

You can put files on the TM drive, but sooner or later you wont be able to. Time Machine will use up as much space as you give it, so regardless of the size of the drive you connect, sooner or later Time Machine will fill it up with backup information. The time it takes to do this will depend on the size of the files you use and how often you edit them. Basically, the larger the drive the better, but it all depends on the two factors: file size and frequency of editing. When Time Machine fills up the drive, it will delete the oldest backups and replace them with new ones dynamically, keeping the drive full but updated with the most recent content. Unfortunately this will mean you wont have any space to put other files on the drive. If you have files on the drive, time machine will fill up the drive around those files and when you delete them, time machine will use up that new space. Basically this means the free space on the Time Machine drive is a temporary thing that will only get smaller and smaller until it will be nonexistant. The best solution for this is to partition the drive into two volumes, and use one for TM and the other for regular disk space (the problem with this is knowing how much to designate to each volume).
I think Apple should put in limits for Time Machins so it only uses a given number of MB/GB on a given drive, and also make it so the Time Machine backups can be dynamically reduced in size by deleting the oldest backups until the database size is reduced to the desired number of GB. I've given feedback to apple about this, and I suggest others do the same. As it currently is, your Time Machine partition is reserved by the system for one purpose only, and other uses for that partition are temporary and limited.

I am SO tired of "music" being screwed up every time I take a picture / and almost every time I send a text (even worse if I send a photo as a text).

I like to listen to books on my iPhone. I like music. It'd be SO NICE if I could continue on with the same story or the same song (or even the same artist / album) if I get interrupeted with a text or I decide to take a photo and send it to somebody. It seems like almost every time I take a photo and send it, I end up with a new new song playing. Or, if I'm in the middle of an audio book, suddenly have music playing when I turn back on the sound. I know I'm not the only one having this problem. I happened to mention it to somebody yesterday and she knew EXACTLY what I was talking about. She also expressed her frustration. I'm running iOS 7. I didn't ask her what she's running. Anybody else want to chime in? Any fixes that anybody knows about?

I like to listen to books on my iPhone. I like music. It'd be SO NICE if I could continue on with the same story or the same song (or even the same artist / album) if I get interrupeted with a text or I decide to take a photo and send it to somebody. It seems like almost every time I take a photo and send it, I end up with a new new song playing. Or, if I'm in the middle of an audio book, suddenly have music playing when I turn back on the sound. I know I'm not the only one having this problem. I happened to mention it to somebody yesterday and she knew EXACTLY what I was talking about. She also expressed her frustration. I'm running iOS 7. I didn't ask her what she's running. Anybody else want to chime in? Any fixes that anybody knows about?

How much space does time machine take up on hard drive?

Can anyone let me know how much hard drive space time machine takes up?

Hi, and welcome to the forums.
Time Machine keeps copies of everything on your system (except a few things like system work files, most caches and logs, and trash), so the first backup will be a bit smaller than the amount of data on your system.
Subsequent backups will copy things you've added or changed, but doesn't delete the copies of the old versions, or of things you've deleted, so you can restore them if you find you've deleted or changed something in error, or something has gotten corrupted. Thus Time Machine will need considerably more space. IIn most cases, it won't delete it's copies until it runs out of room.
It varies depending on how you use your Mac, but a "rule of thumb" is, it needs 2-3 times the space of the data it's backing-up to be able to keep a reasonable "depth" of backups for you.
You might want to review the [Time Machine Tutorial|http://www.apple.com/findouthow/mac/#timemachinebasics] and perhaps browse [Time Machine - Frequently Asked Questions|http://web.me.com/pondini/Time_Machine/FAQ.html] (or use the link in *User Tips* at the top of the +Time Machine+ forum).

Time Machine takes 2 days for 1GB

Since my upgrade to Snow Leopard, my Time Capsule takes 2 days alone for 1GB, and takes 24 hours to even start the 1GB... Any ideas?

HI Tom,
Check to see how much free disk space there is on your Mac.
Right or control click the MacintoshHD icon. Click Get Info. In the Get Info window you will see Capacity and Available. Make sure you always have a minimum of 10% to 15% free disk space at all times.
Not enough and that can slow processes down.
Two days for 1GB... no way.
Carolyn

Time it takes to download from minidv camera to imovie

I'm using a friends imovie and they always download their movies from their camera to imovie by importing the movie using the firewire. They told me the time it takes the movie to download is equal to the time it takes the movie to playback at regular speed. I thought the idea of a digital format and a firewire was to speed up the process of downloading "stuff" to the computer. Is there a way to import my movie without having to play it at the same time. If there is it would save me a lot of time. Thanks for the help.

Hi Lauren.
The transfer may be faster, but since it's usually MPEG-2 or MPEG-4 you need to convert to DV after the transfer. The conversion is much slower than real-time. MPEG is highly compressed compared to DV, so you have lost quality compared to a DV camera.
(iMovie HD does support MPEG-4 directly from SOME cameras, but that is valid only for MPEG-4 projects, not DV projects.)
MPEG recorders include DVD-recorders, hard drive recorders, solid-state recorders and Sony's microMV recorders.

Since the last update of firefox, the time has been 25 to 35 seconds to enter bookmarks or even the time it takes to page down when it used to take a few seconds. can you check why it taking so long since the update on firefox.

since the last update a few days ago of firefox, the time has been 25 to 35 seconds to enter bookmarks or even the time it takes to page down when it used to take a few seconds. can you tell me why it taking so long since the update on firefox. may another update is in order.

I have now done pretty much every suggestion that even vaguely applies in the various helpful link provided. Thanks for the ongoing help. =)
I have managed to get FireFox's start-up memory usage down to about 100,000K, however it appears that memory usage keeps creeping up the longer FireFox is open. (It seems to top out around 500,000K.) And I'm not talking open for many hours or days - but rather for minutes and possibly up to a couple hours. (Based on how long I've been fiddling with all this so far.)
On the plus side, it does not appear GreaseMonkey is the culprit since with it active or disabled this memory creep still occurs. Although having GreaseMonkey enabled definitely increases the rate of memory creep. Though once it has creeped up to 150,000+K, disabling GM does not make it drop back down to the starting 100,000K.
I should point out I run a MacBook Pro and use Bootcamp to partition the hard drive and run it as a Windows 7 PC about half the time. I am running it literally as a PC or, alternately, as a Mac depending on which hard drive I choose to load. (I'm not "windowing" it.) This problem exists regardless of whether I am using the PC or the Mac. These repairs have been made currently on the PC side, and I will attempt them all again on the Mac side. I find it odd that this enormous memory drain has occurred on 3 different computers at the same time. (The two "halves" of my home laptop as well as the PC at my work place.)

40kHz ultrasonic pulse and time it take to receive the Pulse.

Hi,
i have developed the following circuits:
Tx: a Circuit that generates a 40kHz frequency using an LM555, the LM555 is wired to an AND gate which when using the test panel on MyDAQ(6216) i set cntr0 and set it to edge detecting i can count the number of edge detections when i enable the port High and when i switch it low it stops recording the counts.
Rx: Recieving circuit contains an OpAmp which is fed into an LM567CN tone decoder which is tuned to 40Khz. when the recieving circuit PLL locks on to the 40kHz signal the output of the LM567 pin 8 switches to ground.
Question: I am very new to NI and wondering where the starting point would be to create a VI that will trigger the Tx circuit and then measure the time it takes the Rx circuit to recieve the signal, this will intitial be done through air and then i would like to move it through a meduim such as water. Has anyone tried or seen anything that would be of use to create a vi that would match this.
Any help would be greatly appericated.
Phil
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Are you using a myDAQ or a 6216? You mentioned both... I'm going to assume 6216:
You'll want a two edge separation task, and also a digital output task.
The digital output will control the enable signal for the LM555. Connect it from the digital output line to your AND gate as well as to one of the PFI lines on the 6216 (it will be the "first" edge). Connect pin 8 of the LM567 to a different PFI line on the 6216 (the "second" edge). You can configure rising/falling polarity via the Create Channel VI (it sounds like your second edge will be "falling").
Programming would be as follows (in order):
1. Configure the tasks as shown in the linked examples (i.e. create channel / configure timing).
2. Start the digital output task.
3. Write the digital output "low" to make sure it is initialized.
4. Start the two edge separation task (it should be buffered like in the linked example even though you are only reading one sample).
5. Write the digital output "high".
6. Read (one sample) from the two edge separation task. Specify a read timeout long enough to ensure the falling edge is seen.
7. Write the digital output "low" (assuming you want to turn off the Tx when you are done with the test)
8. Stop and Clear both tasks.
The measured result will have a 12.5 ns resolution using the default 80 MHz timebase on the 6216.
Best Regards,
John Passiak

Time to take action

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for