TimeTable applet for TrendMicro InterScan Messaging Security Suite

To handle some features of TrendMicro InterScan Messaging Security Suite, I need to use the TimeTable applet. I succeded only from a pc with Windows 2000 professional with Microsoft virtual machine. I could not succed from Windows XP or from Windows 2003 with sun jre. It appears a red X and there is an error message that says it failed to load the applet. I looked for information about this, but so far I could find information only about proxy settings. But, this happened even in a network without a proxy, where I am free to go anywhere in internet.
Has anybody handled this situation?
Thank You
Rodolfo Giovanninetti

Similar Messages

Verizon Internet Security Suite/ 3 and Fios Inside Wire Maintenance Plans

I just noticed yesterday that I had been charged $6.99 a month for the "FIOS inside Maintenance Plan" and $5.95 a month for the Verizon Internet Security Suite/3 for the past 4 years. After calling customer service to inquire about these plans, I now understand that these plans are optional and automatically added to your bill unless you personally call and have Verizon remove them from your service.
Wanted to share some thoughts and see if people out there feel the same way I do.
I understand the Inside Maintenance Plan but I question the economical value to the customer, especially if it does not know it is paying for the plan.
I do not understand the Internet Security Suite/3. Here I feel it is a total rip off. Nobody has been able to convey what the plan is all about and what value it adds to the customer.
I feel that have been deceived and misled into paying for two plans I did not know I had because nobody presented the optional plans to me when I placed my order. Verizon provides these plans to you for free for 30 days, and if you don't call to cancel, the service continues automatically.
Granted, if you carefully read your bill, as the Customer Service Representative so judiciously told me, you will notice that these plans are added to your bill as separate line items and up to you to question them. I personally think that these practices are unethical, benefit the company, and at the end, it is always the customer that loses. Whether these plans have merit or not, Verizon should be clear and transparent with its customers when they place their orders. The customers must be given all the information they need about these plans so they can make rational decisions on whether they will really benefit from these plans and be given the opportunity to decline these plans when they configure the order of their new service. Furthermore, I really see no value for Verizon to throw these plans in for free for one month as there is no measurable way for the customer to determine whether these plans provide any kind or value to them. Whether deliberate or not, what ends up happening is that hundreds of thousands of customers fail to follow up after one month to cancel the plans and they ended paying for them until they realize just like me that they had been paying for something they did not want at the first place. If Verizon offers the plans for free trial to its customers, the burden should be on Verizon to follow up with the customers to determine if they want to continue the plan or not. That seems to me like a fair compromise.

Verizon Internet Security Suite is nothing more than money down the drain. It's a throw away. Get rid of it and use avast.com and malwarebytes.com, free virus programs that can do the job a lot better. VISS kept saying for the longest time that my computer had no viruses until one day it slowed down to the point where I could no longer get onto the Internet, all because of viruses that VISS never detected! What Verizon doesn't tell you is that it's the cheapest program on which Verizon can get the lowest bid and don't be fooled just because it's "powered" by McAfee. I had to pay a computer expert from the phone book 165 bucks to learn this and at least now I am saving money.

How to setup ProtectLink Gateway between SA540 and Trendmicro's InterScan Messaging Hosted Security?

After license activated, adding the relevant domain name in domain management webpage under Trendmicro's "InterScan Messaging Hosted Security", why the status is showing "verifying" only and the gateway function seems not to be activated. Where problems and where missing steps?

After license activated, adding the relevant domain name in domain management webpage under Trendmicro's "InterScan Messaging Hosted Security", why the status is showing "verifying" only and the gateway function seems not to be activated. Where problems and where missing steps?

Internet security suites for Mac

With the various internet security suites on the market, I wonder which one would be a good one to purchase? I tend to be very leery of the reviews I read of these various security suites. Therefore any feedback would be most appreicated. Thanks Dave

1. This comment applies to malicious software ("malware") that's installed unwittingly by the victim of a network attack. It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the victim's computer. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it. If you have reason to suspect that you're the target of such an attack, you need expert help.
OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user, but internally Apple calls it "XProtect." The malware recognition database is automatically checked for updates once a day; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
The following caveats apply to XProtect:
It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't necessarily been tested by Apple, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
For the reasons given above, App Store products, and other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. OS X security is based on user input. Never click through any request for authorization without thinking.
4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is presumably effective against known attacks, but maybe not against unknown attacks. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
5. XProtect, Gatekeeper, and MRT reduce the risk of malware attack, but they're not absolute protection. The first and best line of defense is always your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and the malware attacker. If you're smarter than he thinks you are, you'll win.
That means, in practice, that you never use software that comes from an untrustworthy source, or that does something inherently untrustworthy. How do you know what is trustworthy?
Any website that prompts you to install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one, is untrustworthy.
A web operator who tells you that you have a “virus,” or that anything else is wrong with your computer, or that you have won a prize in a contest you never entered, is trying to commit a crime with you as the victim. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
Pirated copies or "cracks" of commercial software, no matter where they come from, are unsafe.
Software of any kind downloaded from a BitTorrent or from a Usenet binary newsgroup is unsafe.
Software that purports to help you do something that's illegal or that infringes copyright, such as saving streamed audio or video for reuse without permission, is unsafe. All YouTube "downloaders" are in this category, though not all are necessarily harmful.
Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, must be downloaded directly from the developer’s website. If it comes from any other source, it's unsafe.
Even signed applications, no matter what the source, should not be trusted if they do something unexpected, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it — not JavaScript — in your browsers.
Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a lock icon in the address bar with the abbreviation "https" when visiting a secure site.
Follow the above guidelines, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself from malware.
7. Never install any commercial "anti-virus" or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they all do more harm than good, if they do any good at all. Any database of known threats is always going to be out of date. Most of the danger is from unknown threats. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use the free software ClamXav— nothing else.
Why shouldn't you use commercial "anti-virus" products?
Their design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere.
In order to meet that nonexistent threat, the software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
By modifying the operating system, the software itself may create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
8. ClamXav doesn't have these drawbacks. That doesn't mean it's entirely safe. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
ClamXav is not needed, and should not be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful only for detecting Windows malware. Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else.
A Windows malware attachment in email is usually easy to recognize. The file name will often be targeted at people who aren't very bright; for example:
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥!!!!!!!H0TBABEZ4U!!!!!!!.AVI♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.exe
ClamXav may be able to tell you which particular virus or trojan it is, but do you care? In practice, there's seldom a reason to use ClamXav unless a network administrator requires you to run an anti-virus application.
9. The greatest harm done by security software, in my opinion, is in its effect on human behavior. It does little or nothing to protect people from emerging "zero-day" threats, but if they get a false sense of security from it, they may feel free to do things that expose them to higher risk. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.
10. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.

How long does it take for Verizon Internet Security Suite Powered by McAfee to download?

It's taking a long time for the software to download! I'm wondering how long did it take to download for your computer. The Verizon Servicepoint is still on the same thing saying, "Please wait while the page is loaded." But I've waited a long time now and it hasn't changed. Should I keep on waiting or contact Verizon?

It shouldn't take that long. I posted here with a mcafee per install clean up tool. So try that before calling verizon.
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Internet-Security-Suite-wont-download/td-p/263687
I personally and imo others have had problems trying to do it from firefox or chrome, so for the sake of argument try installing it while using either the in home agent (recommended and easy) or by logging into your account at www.myverizon.com and going to the broadband essentials and extra's section (under your bill a banner ad, and under the banner ad account tools. in that section is a link for manage broadband essentials and extra's)
this might be very helpful for you and is in the verizon mcafee knowledge base.
http://verizon.mcafee.com/faqdocument.aspx?id=TS100850&lang=en_US&prior_tid=2&AnswerID=16777217&turl...
the part that looks most helpful is the end
Download and run the PreInstall Tool:
Click the following link and save the file to your desktop: http://download.mcafee.com/products/licensed/cust_support_patches/McPreInstall.exe.
Double-click the McPreInstall.exe.
Click Start button inside the Preinstall Tool.
Read the warning message and click OK to agree to the changes.
After the Preinstall Tool completes, click OK.
Click Close and restart your computer.
then after you restart your PC - THEN try to install the Verizon Internet security. apparently this preinstall tool cleans up common problems before you try your installation and is supposed to work real well.
remember you can either download the mcafee security using the in home agent (recommended and easy)
or by logging into your account at www.myverizon.com and going to the broadband essentials and extra's section (under your bill a banner ad, and under the banner ad account tools. in that section is a link for manage broadband essentials and extra's)

Is Mac's firewall sufficient or is will an additional firewall help? What security suite do you recomend for MacBook Air with Maverick?

Is Mac's firewall sufficient or is will an additional firewall help? What security suite do you recomend for MacBook Air with Maverick?

Third party security software is better at causing problems then it is at solving them.
I recommend against them.
If you felt it is necessary then configure the firwall software included with OS X.
Allan

Recommended Security Suite for Firefox 25. Using Mcafee Security Center ver 12.8, wondering if I should change to Bitdefender or Kaspersky? Any suggestion

Have 2 Win 8 machines, running Firefox 25 and one lap top with Win 7. All three are using Mcafee Security Suite ver 12.8 with Anti Virus 16.8. The subscription runs out in February 2014. I would like to make a change and am concerned about compatibility issues using Firefox ver 25. Are there any compatibility issues with Bitdefender Windows 8 Security? Are there any compatibility issues with Kaspersky Internet Security 2013 or Pure 3.0 Total Security? If I do make a change on the Security Suites, I will be using the same version on the Win 8 and the Win 7 machines. All three will be using Firefox 25. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Firefox doesn't have any known compatibility issues with any of the major anti-virus suites, but honestly you are wasting your money if you pay for them. Uninstall them and use Window 8's built in Windows Defender. Update your Windows 8 machines to Windows 8.1, and make sure your win 7 machine is up to date, and always keep everything on your machines (Firefox, plugins, etc.) all up to date. That will keep you secure as possible.

Paying double each month for Internet Security Suite?

I noticed that we are paying twice each month for Internet Security Suite: once as a billed item ($6.99); and again as part of the Backup and Security Bundle ($11.00). It seems this has been going on since about Aug 2013.
Hence, I dropped the standalone Security Suite. Now, I'd like a a refund for all those overcharges and an explanation as to how (and why) that occurred.
Thanks in advance.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Just a friendly reminder, this is a forum where users help other users. It looks like your issue may require a Verizon representative to review your account details. Please visit our Support page for a variety of ways to contact Verizon, including “Ask Verizon,” our virtual chat agent, and customer support phone numbers.

Hi, I recently purchased an IPad Air. I have a Dell PC that has the Verizon. Security Suite. Do I need to have virus/malware protection for the IPad Air? Thanks.

Hi, I recently purchased an IPad air. Do I need to place virus protection software for it? I also have a Dell PC that has the Verizon Security Suite. Thanks for your info. Jim

You do not need anti virus for the iPad. The ipad only installs things from the App Store and those apps are vetted. In addition, the operating system of the ipad isn't the same as PC's or Macs so common viruses don't run on them.
The only thing you need to be aware of is protecting your info....Go to a bad site and enter your info and you're just as vulnerable as you would be on a computer. So the device isn't vulnerable to anything but user actions.

Norton Security Suite for I Mac

Just purchased my first Apple I Mac. Was a PC user for years, love my new Apple! I was offered a free download from Comcast for Norton Security Suite. Do I need to have this with my I Mac? I thought the Apple Computers already have firewalls etc. If I download the program will it slow up my computer?

You do not want Norton on your Mac - there have been many problems posted here. As far as general precautions are concerned, this is an exceptionally good read:
http://www.reedcorner.net/thomas/guides/macvirus/

I have Nortons security suite under the old version the Idenity protection worked I kept all my passwords under this which used a master pasword I did not save passwords any were else and now can not get it to work supplying passwords for my l0gon site.

I have Norton's security suite under the old version the Idenity protection worked. I kept all my passwords under this which used a master pasword I did not save my passwords any were else and now can not get it to work supplying passwords for my logon site.

Symantec need to correct a mistake they made with their add-ons. They originally updated their add-ons after quite a delay to work with Firefox 4.0 as shown here - http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-Internet-Security-Norton/Firefox-4-compatibility-hotfix-is-now-available/td-p/428894
They made an error with the update in only listing it as compatible with Firefox 4.0, so they will not install on Firefox 4.0.1 and subsequent Firefox security updates. Symantec have indicated they will be releasing an update to correct their error soon, for details see http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-Internet-Security-Norton/Norton-Toolbar-not-compatible-with-FF-4-0-1/td-p/442788/page/12

Settings for enabling message security tab in message display tool

Hi Experts,
We have a scenario where we are sending data by applying web service security using SOAP receiver communication channel .
I want to check message security log along with audit log in message display tool in RWB.
Can anybody know what are the required settings to enable message security tab in message display toolin RWB?
Regards,
Sari

Hello
Check the link, [Security Configuration at Message Level |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/EN/ea/c91141e109ef6fe10000000a1550b0/content.htm], which describes the steps required.
Regards
Mark

Upon running Norton Security Suite Diagnostic Report on my HP Pavilion dv6 Notebook PC on a Windows 7 Home Premium platform, it shows 2 (hidden) devices not working: Antilog32, and AODDriver4.1--Code 24.

On the General tab for device status it says: "This device is not present, is not working properly, or does not have all its drivers installed. (Code 24)" The only option available when I click
on properties of both devices is Start. When I click on Start for Antilog32, this message shows: "The system encountered the following error when it attempted to start the service: The system cannot find the file specified." For AODDriver4.1, the
message when you click Start on Driver tab is: "The system encountered the following error when it attempted to start the service: The system cannot find the path specified." I do not know how to proceed or
how to fix this, or where to find a solution. Please help!

Hello pds48478480,
Do you mean you got the error code 24 in Norton Security Suite Diagnostic Report?
Please share us a screenshot for better analyzation.
Please take a look at the following thread about the AODDriver4.3.
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-performance/the-aoddriver43-service-failed-to-start-due-to-the/cb6b7f03-922b-4b82-972f-e92ef9919964
AODDriver 4.3 is used by AMD OverDrive which tune parameters to help system stability, optimize performance, and control cooling/acoustic characteristics.
With the issue description it seems the driver and the service is either stopped or not working correctly.
Refer to the link below and install the latest version of AMD OverDrive.
http://www.amd.com/en-us/markets/game/downloads/overdrive
Please note: Since the website is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this information.
Best regards,
Fangzhou CHEN
Fangzhou CHEN
TechNet Community Support

New to Java. Want to write a simple applet for a mobile phone.

Hello,
I want to write a simple java applet for a mobile phone. currently I am in the stage of thinking about whether this is possible in a timeframe of about a month. I have very little java experience from a while back so I'm pretty much starting from scratch.
All I want is an applet that lets you send 2 or 3 variables to an online server. The server will then reposition telescopes.
All i'm concerned with is the mobile phone part, which doesn't have to be secure or impressive. Just a simple interface.
Ideally it should work on my nokia 6070, which occording to the official specs has the following java technology:
MIDP 2.0
CLDC 1.1
JSR 120 Wireless Messaging API
JSR 135 Mobile Media API
Nokia UI API
(I don't know what any of this means but am a good learner).
Can anyone offer me any advice? Is this possible in my timeframe? where should I start? I need a editor and compiler also (I'm using windows XP).
Many thanks and kind regards,
Jason

Actually it is working on my phone now.
I changed the target platform in the wireless toolkit settings to MIDP 1.0
Now to create the fields coordinate fields etc. I don't have much of a clue really.
Current I have:
import java.io.*;
import javax.microedition.lcdui.*;
import javax.microedition.midlet.*;
public class AtmosMIDlet extends MIDlet implements CommandListener
Form WelcomeForm = new Form("AtmosMIDlet");
StringItem WelcomeMes = new StringItem(null, "Please enter coordinates:");
TextField Longitude = new TextField("Longitude", "", 3, TextField.NUMERIC);
TextField Lattitude = new TextField("Lattitude", "", 3, TextField.NUMERIC);
public AtmosMIDlet()
try
ImageItem logo = new ImageItem(Image.createImage("/logo.png"));
WelcomeForm.append(logo);
catch (java.io.IOException x)
throw new RuntimeException ("Image not found");
WelcomeForm.append(WelcomeMes);
WelcomeForm.append(Longitude);
WelcomeForm.append(Lattitude);
WelcomeForm.addCommand(new Command("Exit", Command.EXIT, 0));
WelcomeForm.setCommandListener(this);
public void startApp()
Display.getDisplay(this).setCurrent(WelcomeForm);
public void pauseApp() {}
public void destroyApp(boolean unconditional) {}
public void commandAction(Command c, Displayable s)
notifyDestroyed();
I'm trying to get the image logo.png to display at the top but I get the error:
C:\WTK25\apps\AtmosSpec\src\AtmosMIDlet.java:19: cannot find symbol
symbol : constructor ImageItem(javax.microedition.lcdui.Image)
location: class javax.microedition.lcdui.ImageItem
ImageItem logo = new ImageItem(Image.createImage("/logo.png"));
^
1 error
com.sun.kvem.ktools.ExecutionException
Build failed
When I try to build.. Any help would be great.
Ideally the image would be on a seperate screen for a couple of seconds.

Help regarding applet for querying client's MAC?

Please help with an applet and java code that uses Runtime.getRuntime().exec("ipconfig -all") and gets the client's machine MAC address?
If any one already worked with applets for querying client mahchine MAC , please give me a solution.

remus.dragos wrote:
vasu.mtech wrote:
I am giving an explanation where I want this:
We have an application, where user will be given a specific machine(with one MAC) and have to login from there only. If he tries to login from different machine with same user id, we should throw an error message. That's concept. We know that this reduces/kills operatability of the user from different machines.
But we shouldn't allow the user operating from diffrent machines.What happens if the admins NIC burns? And he gets a news one? He can't log in until you manually change his
MAC in the database ???Database? That's not secure!
It has to be hardcoded into the exe (guess what the kid's next question will be?).

TimeTable applet for TrendMicro InterScan Messaging Security Suite

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for