To Find no og MIGOS pending for MIRO

Hi All,
I am developing a report to find the MIGO'S pending for MIRO's.
Which table should i refer to find MIGO'S pending for MIRO's.including MSEG and MKPF.
will it be done thru EKBE fro this
can any one help........?
TIA
Basu

Hi,
Make the necessary changes according to your Data & Requirement.
  SELECT a~ebeln a~ebelp a~vgabe a~gjahr a~belnr a~buzei a~bewtp a~budat a~matnr a~werks a~xblnr a~menge a~dmbtr
  b~lifnr c~maktx d~name1  INTO TABLE it_final
  FROM ekbe AS a INNER JOIN ekko AS b ON b~ebeln = a~ebeln
                 INNER JOIN ekpo AS e ON e~ebeln = a~ebeln AND e~ebelp = a~ebelp
                 INNER JOIN lfa1 AS d ON d~lifnr = b~lifnr
            LEFT OUTER JOIN makt AS c ON c~matnr = a~matnr AND c~spras = 'E'
  WHERE a~ebeln IN so_ebeln
    AND a~werks IN so_werks
    AND a~matnr IN so_matnr
    AND b~lifnr IN so_lifnr
    AND b~bsart NOT IN ('A', 'B','C' )  " Here add Doc Type - if you have Stock transfer(from Plant to Plant) PO in your Data
    AND a~budat IN so_budat
    AND a~vgabe EQ '1'
    AND a~bewtp EQ 'E'
    AND a~bwart EQ '101'    " Check your MIGO IN mov. types
    AND e~loekz EQ ''
" This is for MIGO Reverse - Again check your MIGO out Mov. types
    AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT ebeln FROM ekbe WHERE ebeln = a~ebeln AND ebelp = a~ebelp AND vgabe = '1' AND bewtp = 'E'
    AND bwart IN ('102','122') AND lfgja = a~gjahr AND lfbnr = a~belnr AND lfpos = a~buzei )
" check for Pending MIRO
    AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT ekbe~ebeln FROM ekbe INNER JOIN rbkp ON rbkp~belnr = ekbe~belnr AND rbkp~gjahr = ekbe~gjahr
    WHERE ekbe~ebeln = a~ebeln AND ekbe~ebelp = a~ebelp AND ekbe~vgabe = '2' AND ekbe~bewtp = 'Q' AND ekbe~lfgja = a~gjahr
    AND ekbe~budat IN rg_budat AND ekbe~lfpos = a~buzei AND rbkp~tcode = 'MIRO' AND rbkp~stblg = '' )
  ORDER BY a~ebeln a~ebelp a~budat.
"Remove Cancelled MIRO from o/p
  SELECT DISTINCT a~ebeln a~ebelp a~gjahr a~belnr INTO TABLE it_ekbe
  FROM ekbe AS a INNER JOIN rbkp AS b ON b~belnr = a~belnr AND b~gjahr = a~gjahr
  FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_final
  WHERE a~ebeln = it_final-ebeln AND a~ebelp = it_final-ebelp AND a~vgabe EQ '2' AND a~bewtp EQ 'Q' AND a~lfbnr = '' AND a~budat IN rg_budat
    AND b~tcode = 'MIRO' AND b~stblg = ''.

Similar Messages

  • PO's Which are MIGO done and Pending for MIRO

    Hi friends,
    Can anyone help out , hw to check the documents which are already done MIGO but pending for MIRO...
    I tried in ME2N and ME2M...but am little confusing in the field selections their....
    Pls let me know the parameters selection for above Requirement
    Regards
    Girish
    Edited by: girishkumar.r on Jul 20, 2010 5:29 AM

    Hi,
    T-Code MB5S - GR.IR balance report. will helpful to find the MIRO pending for PO.
    SAM

  • Purchase Order list pending for MIRO days wise

    i want to know t.code for outstanding Purchase order list dayswise which is pending for Miro....for example payments will be in 15days 30days which is mention in P.O.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rekha Sharma

    Hello,
    Please check MR11
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • MIGO Done for MIRO price- Reversal happening at PO price

    Hi MM Gurus
    I have a situation where:
    PO price is USD 55K for qty3 . MIRO has been done for a wrong amount of USD 100K for 1qty and another MIRO for 55K 1 qty.
    The MIGO is done after MIRO and for 2 qty and it picked a price of 77.50K  each( 100+55 divided by 2).
    Later I reversed the MIRO of 100K. When I reverse MIGO it is adopting a price of 55K ( from PO).
    How do you reverse the wrong MIGO entries to set off the accounting entries.
    Thanks
    Dasaradh

    Hi Dasaradh
    To set accounting entry u can go for subsequent debit where u can debit vendor ( Value which u want to compensate) without affecting miro Qty with ref to invoice no.
    Which in turn will raise credit memo to vendor for additional value
    Vishal....
    Reward if usefull

  • Is there a way to find out the server is pending for a reboot by SCCM? any reg value or something to find it?

    There are some servers which are tagged as No restart servers(which cannot be rebooted regularly) due to some critical apps are running on them.
    Is there any reg value or some thing where we can find the server is pending for a reboot from SCCM? currently the SCCM services are stopped on them to prevent any unwanted reboot. 
    But if can find this info it will be very helpful
    ----Please vote if this is helpful----- -----Knowledge is Power-------- Ajo Abraham [MCP] [MCTS]

    You can also create collection for reboot pending machines based on its lastenforcementmessageID.
    SELECT SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID, SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType, SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,
    SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier, SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,
    SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client FROM sms_r_system inner join SMS_UpdateComplianceStatus
    ON SMS_UpdateComplianceStatus.machineid=sms_r_system.resourceid
    WHERE SMS_UpdateComplianceStatus.LastEnforcementMessageID = 9
    Eswar Koneti | Configmgr blog:
    www.eskonr.com | Linkedin: Eswar Koneti
    | Twitter: Eskonr

  • MIRO MIGO ENHANCEMENT FOR INDIAN SCENARIO - IMPORTS PURCHASE ORDERS

    ENHANCEMENT IN THE MIRO ACTIVITY. IN INDIA YOU HAVE TO POST 7 CUSTOMS CONDITIONS FOR EACH ITEM. MIRO ACTIVITY IS COMPLETELY MANUAL. ALL THE 7 VALUES, QUANTITIES FOR 7 CONDITIONS ARE TO BE ENTERED. CAN THIS BE IMPROVED TO HANDLE IN A BETTER WAY.
    MIGO ACTIVITY FOR MANUFACTURING SCENARIO THE EXCISE VALUES ARE SET OFF WHICH ARE RETRIEVED BUT FOR TRADING SCENARIO WHERE THE EXCISE CONDITIONS ARE CUSTOMISED [ZCV1, ZEC1, ZEC2, ZAD1] TO LOAD ON INVENTORY THE EXCISE VALUES ARE TO BE ENTERED. CAN THIS ACTIVITY BE ENHANCED SO THAT THESE VALUES COME DIRECTLY FROM THE MIRO FOR DUTY POSTINGS WHERE ALL THE VALUES ARE ENTERED
    BEST REGARDS
    PANKAJ

    Hi,
    In a normal import process, before the goods receipt, you are making invoice verification for Customs using MIRO and using Planned delivery costs as an option.
    As the goods receipts doesn't exist, system is not proposing Customs conditions
    As the goods receipts quantity is unknown and there always a possibility of partial invoice verification for the customs, system will not directly populate the values in MIRO.
    Doing enhancements to populate this values may not be needed. Pls convince the user on the import process.
    Any other option available for that, really dont know
    Thanks

  • Pending Invoices for MIRO

    Hi all,
    I want to know the T.Code for list of invoices which pending for doing MIRO.
    Regards,
    Soma

    Hi,
    Its:
    FBV3 - Display Parked Document (Shows documents which are parked and to be posted in FI)
    ME2N - You can also check the Open PO and GR for which no invoices have been created
    Regards,
    Jigar

  • How to find out PR, PO GR's pending for morethan 30days

    Hi Guru's,
                        How to find out the PR,PO,GR's , which are pending for more than 30days. Thanx in advance

    This can be achieved in the purchasing list displays.
    For PRs you can use ME5A.
    select the field change date  (this has the creation date) from dynamic selections, enter the date that is 30 days ago, press F2 and select the icon for smaller than. Further  enter Processing status N. Execute.
    for open GRs you can check in ME2M (by material) and ME2L (by vendor)
    Enter selection parameter WE101, enter delivery date (that is 30 days ago) press F2 and selec the icon for smaller than. Execute.

  • USER CAN'T FIND OWN PO IN GR FOR DESKTOP USER

    Hi,
    We are Using SRM 5.0 with Extended Classic Scenario
    User Can't find his Own PO IN GR for Desktop user .But buyer can search
    it via GR for professional user,
    Only one PO is not Visible in GR for desktop user , rest all PO are
    visisble which pending for GR confirmation.this user can post all GR's
    but for 1 particular PO there is nothing appearing in GR transaction
    because i checked in MIGO and we would be able to post GR in R/3 system
    but somehow this 1 PO does not appear in the users list for GR.
    Pls find the screen shot attached below
    Can you Please suggest for any Oss Note avaibale against this.
    This is very Urgent because user needs it by 25th of sep in order to
    complete GR confirmation .
    Please reply at the earliest.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Prasanna

    Hi Prasanna,
    Its really difficult to explain what's the real problem is with the information provided by you. Look at the following observations which may help you in resolve the issues :
    1. Check in the Extended Search if any other fields were populated / checked which is causing this issue.
    2. Check trying to confirm the P.O  from Confirm goods / services centrally under Centralized Purchasing node.
    3. Check for the status & document history of the P.O in under Process Purchase orders node.
    4. Check whether the confirmation was already made against that P.O or some one would have accidentally clicked the "Complete" button in the change mode of Process Purchase orders. If this is the case then you can not confirm the P.O further.
    Let me know about your observations after checking above points.
    Award points for suitable answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Accounting document number for MIRO

    Hi All,
    Please help me out, is there any way to find out the accounting document of MIRO documents, apart from BKPF table.
    Actually i am checking for developing a query for finding the MIRO which are created without PO details, that is the MIRO dont have any Purchase order details or reference. These MIRO document will be captured in table RBKP but not in RSEG. How can we get only those document which is not created with reference to PO in a query.
    Please help me out on this.
    Waiting for a best solution on this.
    Thanks,
    Nitin Kumar

    HI Ravi,
    Thanks for the response,
    The issue here is all the MIRO invoice done with PO reference or No PO reference will be having the same document type RE, how can we differentiate them.
    Thanks,
    Nitin Kumar

  • Delivery report shows status of Pending for external address. Email sent to both internal and external addresses.

    We have an Exchange 2013 on-premise server and seem to have an issue with emails sent to internal and external users at the same time.
    The issue came to light because someone sent an email to 44 recipients, of which one was internal. None of the external recipients received the email. I checked the delivery report in the EAC and found the internal email marked as 'Delivered' and all of
    the external ones marked as 'Pending'. I checked the queues and there were none. I did some testing and sent an email to just one of the external addresses on the list, it arrived. I tried sending the email again to all of the recipients, the external ones
    all showed 'Pending'. I tried it again, but this time excluded the internal email address and all of the 43 external emails were immediately delivered.
    So it seems that the issue only arises when we are sending to both internal and external addresses.
    I then tried a test email to one internal address and one external address. The Delivery report says that the internal address was delivered immediately, while the external address is 'Pending' and gives more information saying: 'Message delivery is taking
    longer than expected. There may be system delays. For more information, contact your helpdesk.'. To add further mystery to this, the email was actually delivered.
    So, I have two concerns:
    First is seems that some emails sent both internally and externally are only arriving internally. This is a huge problem because I don't know how many have been affected. There may be many lost emails we don't know about.
    Second, it looks like I can't trust the delivery report. It says pending for some emails which didn't arrive, but it also says pending for some which did arrive. That is no good at all.
    For info the server is running Windows Server 2012. I have run a Microsoft Update to check if there are any to apply and the only Exchange one is a spam filter update, which I doubt has any bearing but I will apply when I get chance.

    Hi Neil,
    According to the description, I find a related KB on Exchange 2010:
    https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2694474?wa=wsignin1.0
    It has the similar situation as yours.
    This issue occurs because a function in a message tracking component tries to obtain the information for the recipient instead of the external recipient.
    Please try to upgrade to the latest Exchange update to check whether this issue can be solved.
    Also please check whether Throttling has been set.
    Please run "Get-TransportService | fl" to check the MaxOutboundConnections parameter value.
    More details to see:
    Message throttling 
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232205(v=exchg.150).aspx
    Thanks
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Can't accept BBM invitations and Invites sent show as "Pending for Authorization" but recipients are not receiving them either (PIN Message Status : Service Blocked)

    I recenly changed device from BB Curve 8530 to BB Bold 9900 and ever since then can't accept BBM invitations and Invites sent shows only as "Pending for Authorization" but recipients are not receiving them either. Tried sending PIN messages  but  I got a red x next to the message and the status says: "Service Blocked" .
    When my phone got lost, I was lucky that I just synchronized my device to my BB Desktop. Not only was I able to retrieve my contacts (phonebooks and BBM) but also ALL txt msgs and even call logs
    Anway, that happening, I assumed I don't need to re-send all my BBM friends invites since some were able to communicate with me. But for those who have deleted my profile (knowing it got lost) and were still on my contact were the ones affected. I tried deleting them and sent an invite only to find out that: I can't accept BBM invitations and Invites sent shows as "Pending for Authorization" but recipients are not receiving any. (they also have the same pending for authorization notice on their end) 
    When I tried to send them a PIN message I get a red x next to the message nd get the service blocked message.
    Help I do not know what else to do.
    ** FYI: new contacts added with my new PIN have no prob sending invites and me accepting them all.

    Hello Lhea,
    This issue is most likely Caused by the BlackBerry not being provisioned for BlackBerry Data Services. 
    Please have a look at the following article that covers "Service Blocked" when sending a PIN message:
    http://btsc.webapps.blackberry.com/btsc/KB19244
    I hope this helps.
    -HB
    Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
    Be sure to click Kudos! for those who have helped you.Click Solution? for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

  • BTE for MIRO

    Hi all,
              Is there any Business Transaction Event for MIRO. Actual requirement is, when creating an invoice relating to a purchase order for company code, the plant field of the first PO and it’s first item line quoted on the invoice needs to be copied from the PO field into the assignment field of the FI document.
         Please suggest me, if there is any other method than BTE.
    Thanks in advance.
    with regards,
    Rajeev.

    I could not find any thing in the program.
    Actually I need to link an URL to the Invoice document, once it gets posted.Thats the reason why I am looking for a BTE in MIRO.

  • Purchase Requisition pending for approval

    Hi,
        How to find out the Purchase Requisitions that are pending for approval?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Pavan

    Hi
    Try with ME5A, with dynamic selection option release indicator - blocked or with selection option PReq. processing state- 03.
    Thanks

  • How to check what are the enhancement done for MIRO transaction

    Hi Experts,
    Please help me out, how to check what are the enhancement done for MIRO transaction.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Basanagouda

    Hi
    Use the BADI
    Please refer these documents: [Enhancements required in MIGO|Enhancements required in MIGO; and
    [Enhancement in MIGO for Goods Movement|Enhancement in MIGO for Goods Movement;
    Hope this helps!!
    Regards
    Vijay

Maybe you are looking for