TO priority fields to high priority for special kind of materials.

Hi,
Can we automatically set the TO priority fields to high priority for Can we automatically set the TO priority fields to high priority for special kind of materials?
thanks
Raj Kiran

Hi Prashant,
Is there any way the TO priority can be set to high priority before at the time of TO creation. Becuase the operator has to go through each TO to see if it is a special material which need special attention.
Can we automate this process a little bit by assigning a high priority to TO(automatically) for these kind of materials or is there any other alternative possible through "Special movement indicators"?

Similar Messages

How can I give the "user interface thread" higher priority?

We do alot of activex calls to front panels. We need to increase/decrease the priority of the user interface thread to resolve our thread problem. Anyone know how to do this?
Chuck

Hello,
As P.M. was saying, you can adjust the thread priorities
through the VI Properties dialogue.
Another place to modify the multithreading system in LabVIEW is a VI
located at: [LabVIEW Directory]\vi.lib\Utility\sysinfo.llb\threadconfig.vi. However I do not think this will remedy any
problems you are having.
From a Multithreading in LabVIEW tutorial (http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/d2e196c7416f373a862568690074c759)
Priorities in the User Interface and
Single-Threaded Applications
Within the User Interface execution
system, priority levels are handled in the same way for single-threaded and
multithreaded applications.
In single-threaded applications and
in the User Interface execution system of multithreaded applications, the
execution system queue has multiple entry points. The execution system places
higher priority VIs on the queue in front of lower priority VIs.
If a high-priority task is running and the queue contains only lower priority
tasks, the high-priority VI continues to run. For example, if the execution
queue contains two VIs of each priority level, the time-critical VIs share execution time exclusively until both finish.
Then, the high priority VIs share execution
time exclusively until both finish, and so on. However, if the higher priority
VIs call a function that waits, the execution system removes higher priority
VIs from the queue until the wait or I/O completes, assigning other tasks
(possibly with lower priority) to run. When the wait or I/O completes, the
execution system reinserts the pending task on the queue in front of lower
priority tasks. Refer to the Synchronous/Blocking Nodes section for a list of
asynchronous functions that wait.
Also, if a high priority VI calls a lower priority subVI,
that subVI is raised to the same priority level as the caller for the duration
of that call. Consequently, you do not need to modify the priority levels of
the subVIs that a VI calls to raise the priority level of the subVI.
Thus changing the priority of your VI will change the
priority of UI calls for that particular VI.
Again, I caution you because I suspect that if you are having problems
with your application not running correctly, I do not believe that manipulating
the thread priorities will resolve these issues.
Hope this helps,
Travis M
LabVIEW R&D
National Instruments

T-code for getting consumptions / usage on special stock Q materials?

Hi,
I am facing an issue: special stock Q is not included in all T-codes that I know for getting the consumptions / usage over a period.
--> MC.9, MCBE etc.. are all not showing any results for those kind of materials.
I found the explanation: it's depending on special stock valuation indicator (Blank, A or M), and only A permits to see the consumptions with MCxx T-codes, which is not the one used in the plant I'm currently working in (M)
Since this valuation indicator is a FICO defined parameter, I cannot make it changed to be able to check those materials usage.
Anyone has a tip or know a way to get usage on special stock Q materials?
Thanks for any help!

Hi Sanil Bhandari,
Thanks for trying to help.
Unfortunately MMBE is a snapshot of stock level and reservations by storage location on a single material, and does not display the consumption over a predefined period.
I am still looking for any solution that works with special stock Q materials.

Priority field mandatory for planning plant-order type

Hi
Is there a standard way through configuration that I may contol priority field in order header to be mandatory for some order types only in one planning plant?
Problem is that if I make the priority field mandatory for order type, it will be so for all the planning plants which i dont want. Also i dont want it to mandatory at planning plant level since there are many order types under one planning plant and requirement is to make priority field mandatory only for some order types under this plant.
TIA.

Hi Tehsin
Thanks for the reply.
In the transaction we can separately make it mandatory for either planning plant or order type.
My requirement is for combination of both.

Is it possible in IOS to have two static routes for the same subnet, one a higher priority and "failover" between the 2?

Hi All
Is it possible in IOS to have for a particular subnet:
a) Two static routes?
b) Make one static route a higher priority than the other?
c) If one static router "goes down", failover to the lower priority static route?
We have a l2tp/vpdn connection to a supplier which can be accessed via two vlans/routes. I would like to make one route the preferred one but the "route" to failover if the preferred route goes down.
Again, many thanks in advance for all responses!
Thanks
John

Hi John,
Hope the below explaination will help you...
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
If you notice the Administrative Distance for the secondary route pointing to ISP2 is increased to 10 so that it becomes the backup link.
The above configuration with just two floating static routes partially accomplishes our requirement as it will work only in the scenario where the routers interfaces connected to the WAN link are in up/down or down/down status. But in a lot of situations we see that even though the links remain up but we are not able to reach the gateway, this usually happens when the issue is at the ISP side.
In such scenarios, IP SLAs becomes an engineer's best friend. With around six additional IOS commands we can have a more reliable automatic failover environment.
Using IP SLA the Cisco IOS gets the ability to use Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) pings to identify when a WAN link goes down at the remote end and hence allows the initiation of a backup connection from an alternative port. The Reliable Static Routing Backup using Object Tracking feature can ensure reliable backup in the case of several catastrophic events, such as Internet circuit failure or peer device failure.
IP SLA is configured to ping a target, such as a publicly routable IP address or a target inside the corporate network or your next-hop IP on the ISP's router. The pings are routed from the primary interface only. Following a sample configuration of IP SLA to generate icmp ping targeted at the ISP1s next-hop IP.
R1(config)# ip sla 1
R1(config)# icmp-echo 2.2.2.2 source-interface FastEthernet0/0
R1(config)# timeout 1000
R1(config)# threshold 2
R1(config)# frequency 3
R1(config)# ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
The above configuration defines and starts an IP SLA probe.
The ICMP Echo probe sends an ICMP Echo packet to next-hop IP 2.2.2.2 every 3 seconds, as defined by the “frequency” parameter.
Timeout sets the amount of time (in milliseconds) for which the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation waits for a response from its request packet.
Threshold sets the rising threshold that generates a reaction event and stores history information for the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation.
After defining the IP SLA operation our next step is to define an object that tracks the SLA probe. This can be accomplished by using the IOS Track Object as shown below:
R1(config)# track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
The above command will track the state of the IP SLA operation. If there are no ping responses from the next-hop IP the track will go down and it will come up when the ip sla operation starts receiving ping response.
To verify the track status use the use the “show track” command as shown below:
R1# show track
Track 1
IP SLA 1 reachability
Reachability is Down
1 change, last change 00:03:19
Latest operation return code: Unknown
The above output shows that the track status is down. Every IP SLAs operation maintains an operation return-code value. This return code is interpreted by the tracking process. The return code may return OK, OverThreshold, and several other return codes.
Different operations may have different return-code values, so only values common to all operation types are used. The below table shows the track states as per the IP SLA return code.
Tracking
Return Code
Track State
Reachability
OK or over threshold
(all other return codes)
Up
Down
The Last step in the IP SLA Reliable Static Route configuration is to add the “track” statement to the default routes pointing to the ISP routers as shown below:
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 track 1
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
The track number keyword and argument combination specifies that the static route will be installed only if the state of the configured track object is up. Hence if the track status is down the secondary route will be used to forward all the traffic.
Please rate the helpfull posts.
Regards,
Naidu.

Query:Pop up on login for incomplete high priority tasks in sap inbox

Hi All,
I am having requirement to display pop up for incomplete high priority in sap inbox on loging in sap.
I wil be thankful if you can guide to fulfill this requirement.
Thanks.

Hi,
To get the High priority work items you can use the table SWWWIHEAD.
using this table you can get the Priority, Status, and agent of the work item. Using this you can build the logic to
display the pop up with this details.
Thanks,
Viji.

SMS triggering for High Priority Incident

Hi,
I am using Solman 7.1 SP10. I have already configured ITSM-Incident Management.
My requirement is, is it possible to trigger to SMS to support team message processors, if Incident is of High OR Very High priority.
is this SMS triggering configurable in Solman ? If yes, how to configure.
Regards
PK

Hi P K,
Your requirement can be divided in to 2 parts.
1st Part : You can route the messages to respective support team based on the priority of the messages via BRFPLUS. Below is the url for routing of messages based on SAP Components.
Support Team Determination via Business Rule Framework plus - SAP IT Service Management on SAP Solution Manager - SCN Wi…
In the similar fashion you have to do it based on priority of messages.
2nd Part : Basis Area.
You can configure the SMS triggering instead of email.
Regards,
Kumar

How to turn off high priority mark for emails

I would like to turn off high priority mark for emails. Plaese advise!

If you are talking about flagging and unflagging email messages in the mail app .... Find the email - open it - tap on Mark - select unflag.

How to assign higher priority for labview while running other applications.

HI,
I am performing 2 time critical counter operations. I am using software time due to the hardware limitation of PCI6013(I have tried all other options). My problem is that I get a erractic value when I use mouse, keyboard or change to other application.
I found the following link providing a method to provide maximum priority to labview application.But even regular labview users are asked not to use this application. I am not even a regular LABview user.Is there any precaution that I should take to use this VI. I am in need of such an application very badly. Please Help.
http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&RPAGEID=135&HOID=506500000008000000F5880000&UCATEGORY_0=_1
5_&UCATEGORY_S=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_TIER_0=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_TIER_S=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_0=priority&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_S=0

"Is there any precaution that I should take to use this VI."
Yes many,
When you start to experiment with settings priorities in an attempt to avoid the affects of mouse clicks, then you should brace yourself for the application appearing hung. This would happen if LV had a higher priority than the mouse interupt service routine.
Same applies to the other conditions you mentioned.
If you go this route, backup before you experiment! Some strange things can happen to your file system.
I have talked to you about this challenge of yours in another thread. This is what I recomend.
1) If you can live with your readings being made on only one gear at a time, AND the sample rate being aperiodic, then you MAY be able to use DAQ Occurances and two session. I
have not done this myself, and AM NOT SURE if it can be done or if you hardare supports it, but maybe;
a) Open two references to your and configure A so it uses hardware timing (like you already said works good) to count gear A using the other counter as the gate. On the other session you are counting gear B.
b) Configure both of the above to fire occurances when done.
c)Start only session A.
d) When A occurance fires start B.
e) When B fires start A, etc.
This will give you determinism on the counts and effectively shift the indeterminism to the update interval.
If this is not good enough then there is another option. Can you get yourself a nice solid external reference that you can apply as an external gate to both counters? If so you will be using hardware timing and you should be on the right track.
If these do not work out, you may end up having to go to different hardware.
Just trying to help,
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Listing Items based on criteria e.g. High Priority Items First.

Hi,
One of our customers have a need to List High Priority Items first on the WebTools site.
Let's take two ItemCodes for example: Printer001, and, Monitor001.
>> If these two items are included in the same category then Monitor001 will appear before Printer001 as WebTools sorts in alphabetic ascending order;
>> But, our customer wants Printer001 to appear before Monitor001 as it is an Item higher in priority that Printer001.
I can think of two possible solutions:
1/2) Prefix Items with a number or letter to have it appear first in the WebTools default sort order. E.g. Rename "Monitor001" as "AMonitor001". This will not be possible for existing Items in SAP, so it doen't solve the issue,
Or,
2/2) Customize the Default WebTools Item List block to sort Items based on a User Define field called "pririty". Which might require a lot of effort.
Please advise if anyone else has solved similar issue and how.
Thanks very much for your replies in advance.

Hey Kafil ... I think you may be stuck modifying the parts list page or creating something from scratch. I'm not aware of an easy way to do this out of the box.

Insight how ascp Order Priority (field Order Priority) is derived ?

Anyone has detailed information on how ascp assigns "Order Priority" in the Order Priority field in the workbench ?
I understand one factor is Priority Rule, but I need more detailed logic behind it.
Is this field really meant to tackle the priority of working through all the recommendations ?
Thanks much.

Hi
ASCP uses priority rule to generate an order priority for end demands like SO, forecast etc. Once this is generated, it uses pegging information to derive order priority for the supplies based on demands it is used to satisfy.
For example, a supply pegged to a sales order may get higher priority than another supply pegged to a forecast in similar time bucket. You may make use of more advanced priority rule settings including custom extensions to set order priorty for demands which will finally derive order priorty for the supplies.
Setups like FIFO vs. priorty pegging may also impact this derivation. Please let me know if you may require further details in this respect.
Thanks
Navneet Goel

Clear "high priority" status of incoming mail

Okay, I have several emails I have marked as "flagged" so I can sort by that field and they stay at the top. Problem is, those annoying people who think all of their email is high priority (and flag them as such) are immediately following the flagged emails. This pushes new email down the list even further.
I can't figure out how to clear that high priority status so they fall in chronological order with all the other email. Ideas?
Thanks!

You can't. The priority is being sent via a special header in the mail. These headers are created by the senders machine upon sending. Mail.app just displays the priority given in the header information. There is no way in Mail.app to alter the messages headers.

Why is time-critical thread not interrupting sleepless high priority thread?

Hello,
I have two threads running in the same execution system on a real-time PXI platform. The time-critical thread sleeps using "AI Single Scan.VI", and acquires my data at a rate of 8000 Hz.
I have a slower high priority process that calls a DLL function to calculate some filter coefficients. This function call takes longer than 1/8000 s to complete, and runs in a loop, executing as often as it can (with new data from FIFOs).
I expected the time-critical thread to interrupt the the high priority thread without problem.
I am finding that unless I insert a LabVIEW delay (for example a wait for x ms VI) in the loop, the real-time system stops responding. With a small delay (ie 1 ms), t
he acquisition completes, and a FIFO shuts down the loop of the slow process.
Why do I need a labVIEW delay in the high-priority loop, when the DLL function call itself is quite slow? Even without a DLL call, I would expect the time-critical VI to interrupt, finish its data acquisition, and shut-down the high-priority thread using its FIFO.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Frenk

Here are a couple things to try/check:
1) Check the call library node in your high priority VI. If it's orange (runs in UI thread), your high priority VI is actually switching to the UI thread every time your dll runs. That alone is not a problem. But if your TC VI tries to update any control terminals, the TC thread will switch over to the UI thread to access UI resources, possibly while the dll within your high priority VI has a lock on those resources. Why does the dll have a lock on UI resources? Because it was running in the UI thread and got interrupted by the TC thread before it finished doing its business. Not likely, but possible.
2) There's another possible reason you're seeing this behavior. If the TC VI and the high VI call a mutual subVI, the subVI will be elevated to ALWAYS run in the highest priority thread irrespective of the actual caller (in your case, it's the the TC thread). Even when the *high priority VI* calls the mutual subVI, that subVI runs in the time-critical thread, which means there's a thread switch from high to TC, then back to high after the subVI finishes. And because high and TC VIs are in the same exec system, that mutual subVI will always run in the 1 and only TC thread alotted to that exec system.
So, while your TC VI is running, you're in the TC thread. While, your high VI is running, you're in a high non-TC thread, and when your high VI calls the mutual subVI, you're again in the TC thread until the subVI finishes.
So how could this arrangement cause your TC VI to become starved by the high VI? If your TC VI wakes up while the high VI is in the middle of running the mutual subVI, the TC thread responsible for running the TC VI is actually busy (in the middle of running the subVI in your high VI!!!), so the TC thread cannot run your TC VI until it finishes running that mutual subVI.
The fix: make your TC VI run in a different exec system. It will be given its own TC thread that no one else can mess with. When TC VI wakes up, it's guaranteed a TC thread.
I think there's a good reason behind why a mutual subVI ALWAYs runs at the highest priority of all its callers, irrespective of the actual caller's priority...but I can't think of the reason at the moment.

EIM Auto pushback - requeue at higher priority?

Hello,
In our EIM 4.3.2(8) implementation (ICM Enterprise integrated queues and agents), all new and incomplete activites auto-pushback to queue after 8 hours (overnight generally). The problem with this is, they're getting pushed to the back of the queue. I'd like to have all auto-pushback emails queue at a higher priority so that during days of high email volume, we don't get stragglers that keep getting pushed to the end of the queue while newer emails get handled.
I saw this:
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Transferred_Emails_Get_Sent_To_End_of_Queue
and thought maybe I could pull some Activity related column through to ICM to act on to change the priority... Not sure what I should use though. I considered looking at the "WHEN_CREATED" field and upping the priority in ICM if that's more than a day ago, but I wonder if there is a simpler way to do this.
Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

New tasks are sent from EIM to ICM in order queue priority, activity priority and oldest - in that order. While sending new task there is no differentiation between new email first time in queue Vs email which is auto pushed back to queue, if queue and activity priority are same then oldest activity criteria will be honored.
There is no other way in default EIM product to push auto pushed back emails ahead of others.

High priority bug to be solved very urgent

Hello Experts,
I need your help and plz close this topic once its solved.
Here is the problem:
There is report called "Material Group".When its is displayed for material gorup say "GB06010000" is displayed as part of report data wheras the source system (oracle ) does not have this item any more in the catalog. This indicated that data is not refreshed for quite a long time.
This report is connected to the third party application (oracle db) not EBP system(r/3). Time to time there has been deletion or addition catalog items and in all as of today there are 815 items, whereas BIW report displays 4204 items. How can i refresh this data to display 815 items.
how to solve this issue any ideas or suggestion????
the reports is on ODS level.
I hope all of u take this problem as urs and try to give me solution as earliest possible.
<b>this is high priority issue from client side</b>.
thanks in advance . Surely il assign the points.
email id: [email protected]
Urs,
Raki.

Hey Lilly,
Yep i have deleted the contents of ODS sucessfully and i have reloaded it sucesfully but from biw side there is no problem as i feel.
So i requested my onsite people to look in to the oracle db table how many records are available.Later then we will make take some decision .
So still the problem isnot solved il be updating this in another couple of days.So i request u to take care this issue and now i have assigned u points also.
Thanks for ur info.
Possible give me ur personal mail id so that i can direclty drop to ur mail.
Urs,
Raki

TO priority fields to high priority for special kind of materials.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for