Tool re-arranging order for personal preference
I am a #1 PSCS5 user and there is no prog. to compare--- one major request for the next build---please make the tools arrangeable per user preference. As an artist, most of the tools I use are either at the top or 3/4 down- eating my time up on tasks. I understand the sequence of layout that you have presented. If I could place the tools I use most in a 1,2,3 order my timing would be cut in half...and I do work fast! Know that there are certain shortcuts to this request but none that would compare if I could place in the sequence I that I use. I am sure that I am not the only person who would appreciate this! Thank you for considering this request!
have downloaded but now need to get this to work... created new tool order but have yet to get this to be recogonized by PS but see there are responses that address this... will try... so will let you know later if this works for me! A... says this is a 30 day trial... is everything a trail and error?
Similar Messages
-
How do I change the size of the tools and the text for the menus in Photoshop? I need a magnifying glass in order to make out what they are.
Okay, I've figured it out, so I'm going to answer my own question in hopes that it may help anyone else that would like to actually be able to see what they're doing when using Photoshop CC 2014 on a high resolution screen.
1. Open Photoshop.
2. Select Preferences from the Edit Menu, then select General.
3. Change the HUD Color Picker to Hue Strip (Medium).
4. Select Interface from the Preferences menu on the left side of the dialog box.
5. Change the UI Font Size to Large in the Text area of the Preferences dialog box.
6. Select Experimental Features from the Preferences menu on the left side of the dialog box.
7. Select Scale UI 200% for high-density displays (Windows only).
8. Click on OK, then Exit/Quit Photoshop.
9. Open Photoshop and everything should be readable. -
I am a long-term user of Lightroom as a standalone product with a perpetual licence. As a retired person on limited income, it is very disappointing to me that Adobe have introduced the 'Creative Cloud' (CC) subscription service in order for me to be able to continue upgrading this excellent product. It will be for me too expensive at the minimum cost of £9 per month. The additional services that CC brings are personally of no relevance or usefulness. Adobe should be prepared to support existing users who are, like myself, non commercial, amateur photographers by giving them the simple opportunity to upgrade to Lightroom 6 as a standalone, perpetual licence product. As a member of a camera club I know my co-members who use Lightroom are equally disappointed by this move to a subscription-only service.
john beardsworth wrote:
John Waller wrote:
However, Adobe will soon introduce Cloud only features into Lightroom CC for which LR6 (perpetual license) owners will have to wait until LR7 (paid upgrade).
That is possible, John, but it is only speculation on your part. Might, not will.
kwdaves wrote:
There is a "Lightroom 6" upgrade available for US $79 if you have a valid license for any of the earlier versions. From what I can tell, the only difference between Lightroom 6 Full, Lightroom 6 Upgrade and LightroomCC is in the license. The download file is the same.
Other differences - with CC you get LrMobile/LrWeb and they throw in a free copy of Photoshop too.
Yes, but when I bought my standalone license and clicked on the "Download" button it took me to the LightroomCC page. The downloaded file is named Lightroom 6, but in the CC app the installed program is LightroomCC (2015). -
I ordered Illustrator via creative cloud for another user. I received an invitation that was accepted and tried to change the account to the name and email of the person it was ordered for. How can I get this changed and the invitation sent to the right person?
Cloud as a Gift https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1665610
-
Can we create a sales order for party_type='PERSON' ?
can we create a sales order for party_type='PERSON' ?
Thank you,
Cheers,
Naveen.Hi
Yes You can create a SO for a Party_type of Person, But it should have Customer account (i.e) The Person should have a Bill to / Ship to site
Hope this helps
Regards
Sivakumar -
How to stop a person from creating an order for a particular region?
Hi All,
Suppose there are three regions viz :
1.Asia
2.Middle East
3.Europe
Now what I want that when a agent /end user is creating an order for a particular person for a specific region, he gets an error message that "Orders cannot be created for this person."
I mean he can create orders for other people of that region but not for a specific guy.
Also the End user has the authority to create orders for all the above mentioned three regions.So (I Guess) there are no changes to be done in SU01.
What is the configuration that needs to be done for this one?
I hope my query is clear and thanks in advance for your advises.
ThanksI don't think so. There is no role that has VIEW only at user level- neither in CRM nor in R/3.
Only at shop level, we can set if "Order Change" is allowed or not. But nothing to limit ordering at any level.
Even in CRM 5.0 up, out of the box, you have only got:
SAP_CRM_ECO_ISA_WU_B2B_ORDER - Can Create an Order but can not Change
SAP_CRM_ECO_ISA_WU_B2B_FULL - Can Create an Order as well as Change
No role for just display only rights. For full set of available [Web Channel authorization roles|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm60/helpdata/en/46/7aea16f4ca468ce10000000a114a6b/content.htm], check this link out.
Easwar Ram
http://www.parxlns.com -
Way to change order of person type for search window under the People
Hi,
we need to change ordering of person type. Normally we open search window to find any specific record either employee/contingent or applicant which show's “Employee” as default value.
Is there any way to change type employee to contingent worker as default value?Hi user-Keen,
hmm interesting.. never tried this, but can you try personalisation and see if this works -
WHEN-NEW-FORM-INSTANCE
Block : EMP_QF
Field : NUMBER_TYPE
Value : CWK
The value is defaulted to EMP, try changing this to CWK
Thanks,
Vignesh -
why is it that every time i start up my macbook air and when i restart it, that the new office with word and those three other apps constantly pop up? even though i went to personal preferences/users/login items, and selected the box that clearly says "items to NOT be brought up when logging in" ?
If you don't want to start Office automatically when your Mac starts, see > http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac/forum/macoffice2011-macword/how-do-i-prev ent-microsoft-office-2011-word-from/dd5b8b17-8397-4e7c-b635-79b9c976c4ab?msgId=f 00ac42a-e4fe-43aa-83d7-16ccd35a0d8a
Also, on System Preferences > Users & Groups > Login Items, select all items related to Office and press - button to delete them -
Sorting order for Highlights, Shadows, Whites and Blacks controls.
I absolutely love the new set of controls as compared to the similar options in LR3. With just these 6 controls and a few seconds I can get my image looking great. One thing is making me crazy though, the four controls are logically sorted "Whites, Highlights, Shadows, Blacks" in terms of the range that they impact. If the controsl were sorted as I suggested, I would be able to think through the problem of fixing a particular image more efficiently.
Has this been discussed or considered?tomalphin wrote:
I should add, with only four items in question, putting the two you are most likely to use slightly closer together will result in little gained efficiency. Having them sorted in a manner that is easier to teach, learn and internalize will likely lead to better results for a larger percentage of users.
Further, if they were sorted in the manner I suggest, it would be possible to further strengthen the understanding of how the features work by showing a color curve overlay on the histogram. This would make it even easier for folks to understand how these six abstract controls affect the image.
It sounds like there is a mix of rational and reactive pushback to this approach from the vocal audience on this forum. I would be very interested to see how the two compared in blind lab studies with participants of comparable experience. (Including new and existing users... I would like to think that Adobe is saavy enough to realize that it is important to court new users if they want to grow their customer base and profit opportunity.)
If there's one thing we can pull from this whole discussion, it's that there's no way for Adobe to make everyone happy on this issue. There just isn't. Some people absolutely hate that the sliders are ordered as the are in LR4b, others seem to think it makes perfect sense. Both are adamant in their stance. So now it becomes this whole over-blown issue of," What percentage of users like it this way compared to that way." I'm sorry, but I just don't understand why it's such a big deal. Is it that hard to use the controls in the order that Adobe placed them in LR4b. Really? Is it? Is it really that slow for you high-volume photographers out there? Is it really something that you won't completely get used to in all of a few hours of using LR4?
The current sort order of the sliders in LR4b is not necessarily just an order-of-operations that is being thrust upon Lightroom users. The rationale is that the controls follow an order which, in most cases for most photographs, flows from the most global adjustments to the most specific. It's more than just an arbitrary ordering based on "what Adobe says we ought to do first".
The truth is, while I understand Adobe's reasoning here, I really don't care what order the sliders end up in. Why? Because it really doesn't matter all that much, at all. I mean, think about it. Let's say that the current order of the sliders in LR4b makes it to the final version. Are users going to keep using Lightroom 3 in protest? No. Are users going to keep all their photos in PV2010 expressly because they simply can't handle the order of the sliders in PV2012? No. The reason that nobody will go to such lengths is that it's reallly just not that important. This is an exceptionally minor issue of personal preference that has less weight and importance than the hard drive space at Adobe used to store all of the threads that have popped up in complaint of the slider order.
I know that everyone vehemently arguing against the current slider order will whole-heartedly disagree... but I simply had to put in my two-cents. The issue of slider order is so miniscule that I cannot fathom why so much has already been written about it.
EDIT*****
An afterthought...
Really? "Blind lab studies" to scientifically determine what order to put LR4 sliders in? C'mon guys... you've got to be kidding me... -
Free Goods Sales Order for Charities with Credit Limit
Dear All
I have a scenario where POS (Point of Sales) has been implemented,the process of POS is ok,but the requirement of the client is they are giving some goods to charity,when ever a person comes with a special card (Issued by the company) the outlet will create a sales order for the same without any charges with a credit limit of 1000 SAR (saudi arabian riyal).
Requirement
1) Creation of sales order with delivering goods but without any charges.(should have effect in Stock)
2)These charities is been treated as Customer with a credit limit of SAR 1000 (whenever the credit limit exceeds system should block the order)
how this scenario can be mapped in SD,
Thanks in advance
MalikDear Malik
keep the process regular, which will help in blocking the charity customer when reached 1000 SAr at order level itself.
As customer need to be shown that he is not charged.
you can work on changing the display of output determination .
You can take the help of Ababer and display what ever client is asking for.
I think this may solve your query without disturbing you regular business process.
Regards
Pavan Kumar -
I'm hoping someone out there knows if I can use 1 apple ID and 1 iTunes account to sync 2 different iPhone 4S's - one for personal use, and one for work use. I would like to be able to sync with the same music and app's on both, but need to keep the contacts and calendars completely separate between the 2 phones since I don't want personal data on the work phone or work data on the personal phone. Can you help me figure this out?
Yes!
Luckily, if you be very careful and pay attention to what you have selected in itunes, you can separate these things
Basically, in iTunes, there are tabs at the top for Summary, info, apps, etc..
These tabs control PER DEVICE what syncs between itunes and the device.
Therefore, you can plug iPhone 4S #1 in, and select to sync contacts with address book, then do so. Then plug iPhone 4S #2 in, and not choose to sync with address book. iTunes will keep these settings separate. However, in that situation for music and apps, you would check to sync both on both, in order to get all music and apps on each.
The only thing to watch out for, each computer 'user' has only one set of address book and ical, meaning that if you want to sync both phones to the computer, but dont want to mix contacts, only one phone will be able to sync contacts and/or calendars. Basically, each category in the Info tab will only hold one device's information, so you CAN do contacts with iPhone 4S #1, and calendars with #2. -
Whenever I turn my MacBook pro on, all the other stuff is loaded (MS word/excel/powerpoint), Spotify, iCal, etc are automatically loaded, so in order for me to go to my desired website, I have to close (x) out all applications loaded. Please advise.
If you are using Lion:
Dealing With The Resume Feature of Lion
Managing Mac OS X Lion's application resume feature.
If you shutdown your computer you should get a dialog asking if you want applications to resume on the next startup. Simply uncheck the box to prevent that from occurring. Open General preferences and uncheck the option to Restore windows when quitting and re-opening apps. You can also install a third-party utility to control resume features on individual applications: RestoreMeNot or Application State Cleaner.
It is possible to completely stop the Resume feature although I'm unconvinced that it is that annoying. Nevertheless see the following:
If you have not yet done so you must first make your /Home/Library/ folder visible. Open the Terminal application in the Utilities folder. At the prompt paste the following command line:
chflags nohidden ~/Library
Press RETURN. Quit the Terminal application.
In the Finder navigate to the /Home/Library/Saved Application State/ folder. Delete the contents of the folder. Back up to the /Home/Library/ folder. Select the Saved Application State folder. Press COMMAND-I to open the Get Info window. In the Sharing and Permissions panel at the bottom click on the lock icon and authenticate. Set each of the listed entries to Read Only. Close the Get Info window.
Quit all open programs except the Finder (this is very important.) Next, navigate to the /Home/Library/Preferences/ByHost/ folder. Look for a .plist file with "com.apple.loginwindow." in the file name followed by some numbers in hexadecimal. Select the file. Press COMMAND-I to open the Get Info window and in the Sharing and Permissions panel click on the lock icon and authenticate. Set each of the listed entries to Read Only. Close the Get Info window. If you also find a file with the same filename but with a last extension of ".lockfile," then you should delete it.
The above should eliminate the Resume feature system-wide. Note that any future system updates or upgrades will likely undo these changes. You will then need to repeat this procedure assuming there are no major changes in OS X related to it. -
How to stop PR creation from PM work order for a particular vendor?
Hello Experts,
We have following scenario for breakdown maintenance activities.
When a machine breaks down, a breakdown order is created in SAP. The external manintenance services are planned in the order. When the order is released, a single PR (with multiple item numbers corresponding to number of services) is created by SAP. The PR has a release strategy. When PR is released, PO is created followed by the SES.
The practice followed AS -IS for breakdown outside business hours:- If the breakdown happens outside business working hours, the person releasing the PRs is not available & hence PR can not be released resulting in no PO & no subsequent SES.
In this case, the maintenance is completed by the external agency & the work order is TECO. The next day, TECO is reveresed, new PR is created, released, converted into PO, & then SES.
TO-BE process:- Client expects that, for certain vendors identified, PR should not get created at all from the breakdown order. (The list of vendors will be maintained seperately). For these vendors, a framework order will be created at the start of fiscal year & SES will be created as & when required agaainst the framework order.
My concern is :- How to stop PR creation from PM work order for a particular vendor? OR delete the created PR?
Highly appreciate your quick response.
Thank you.
Amit
Note:- My ABAP consultant has checked following BADI's, but could not find it useful.
IWO1_ORDER_BADI
ORDER_COSTING_CK
DATA_EXTENSION_CK
VALUATION_CK
ME_REQ_OI_EXT
IWO1_PREQ_BADI
ME_CHECK_SOURCES
ME_REQ_POSTED
IWO1_ORDER_BADIDear Amit
I am giving a different dimension to your question check if it fulfills your requirement -
As we know Vendor selection comes at a later stage only after your PR creation, approval & RFQ etc. & PR generation from maintaine. order is controllled through control key PM03. While triggering PR from order you have to specify Material group, Purchase group and vendor. Try to control it through authorisation as all these are authorisation objects. The persons executing breakdown order shall no t be given this authoriations
shakti -
Default Sort Order for Library View
It would be fantastic if there were a user defined preference for a default sort order in Library view. For example, some users may prefer to always view the images by File Name, or Rating, etc, without having to change the sort order for each individual folder they view via Lightroom.
Thanks!Thanks for your suggestion Allan, but it doesn't work.
I'm specifically referring to the defaults that Aperture 3 adopts when you use the "File, Import, Folders as Projects with the projects and albums setting.
What I'm finding is regardless of the setting in the Library preferences, the default sort order for the project is Date and Manual for the album.
Yet if I create a project manually the default sort order is as per the Library prefs. Strange. -
Regading deletion of existing order for customer
hi friends
i nedd to delete existing order for particular customer when creating new order for that customer by useing API. how to delete order by useing API and one more thing how to do i mean which parameter or procedure useing for that
thanks
cahndra sekhartPlease be more clear about what you're trying: tools used, statements, examples, ...
I suspect this is no issue with the SQL Developer tool. If it's pure SQL, please post these questions under the dedicated SQL And PL/SQL forum.
Regards,
K.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Credit card security code - where can it be stored in SAP?
We are in the process of encrypting our credit card numbers and the question asked was - can we store the 3 character security code from the back of the customer's credit card. I've looked on the screens and in the tables, but don't see a place that
-
Hi all, can anyone explain me the Concept of version in Project System? And How to get the Version by giving the Project ID as Input
-
I have a question about unicode mixups. I have a lot of old files with old fonts. If I need to upgrade some file, sometimes I need to change a font. Now some fonts will get you the problem that the unicode of the glyphs is not recognised or mixed up.
-
MWST not in SO but OK in Invoice.
Hello, Not sure what's wrong but my MWST won't come in to the sales order unless I go to the header and run "Update conditions" when its an item condition. Everything is in place 1 for customer 1 for MM, access sequence, condition records, pricing pr
-
I know this is a very basic question but how do you redirect port 80? I have an option to port forward or port trigger. What I am trying to do is use a program called Remote Administrator. It works locally on my network but as soon as I try to conn