Toplink support for Java 5.0

I tried to import java classes, compiled with jdk 5.0
into Toplink workbench. The mapping fails.
I tried to run the workbench with jre 5.0 but that didn't work either.
Does anyone know how to do it and does Toplink even have a version that supports java 5.0?

Anna,
TopLink 10.1.3 will offer formal support for Java 5.0. Currently the runtime should work fine with Java 5.0. The only issue may be the workbench mapping process depending on the version of TopLink you are using.
If you are using the 10.1.3 preview the workbench will still run with JDK 1.4 but should be compatible with importing and mapping classes compiled with JDK5. We will upgrade the JRE used by the workbench to JDK5 for the production release but this should not make any difference to your ability to map JDK 1.4 or 5 classes and use either at runtime.
If you are using 9.0.4.X then the workbench will not be able to run or import JDK5 compiled classes. I believe the runtime is fine but not certified. For this environment you will need to compile the classes under JDK 1.4 and map this version of the classes. You can then use JDK5 compiled version in conjunction with the runtime.
I hope this helps,
Doug

Similar Messages

Queries on Mac OS X support for Java 1.3

Hi All
I am having some trouble figuring out how to make Swing based Applets
work on Mac OS X. Can anybody help me ?
Queries on Mac OS X support for Java 1.3
1) Will a Java Applet compiled using Java 1.3 run on "Mac OS X" without the need for a Plugin.? This includes Applets using Swing since we compiled using 1.3.
2) I tried to run some Java 1.3 applets compiled using 1.3.1-04.
Unfortunately, the Applets wouldn't run.
Is there some setting in Mac OS X that i need to change or modify for the Applet to work ?
3) When i open a Terminal in Mac OS X and type Java -version, i get
"------ Java 1.3---------".
This implies that Mac OS X supports the Java 1.3 SDK. Does it imply that it supports the runtime as well since this is usually the case ?.
If it supports the runtime, then does this inculde support for Swing.
Finally, as i enquired in '(1)' does this mean that i do not need any plugin(MRJ) to make Swing based applets work.
Thanks and regards
Prashanth

What I am seeing is that Java is throwing a security error when file io is initiated by an external call from Javascript to a file on the server that java should have access to. Here is the error.
<<< ProxyClassLoader: defined LiveConnectProxy class. >>>
<<< Here're the permissions you've got: >>>
<<< java.security.Permissions@157402b (
(java.net.SocketPermission www.dhba.com connect,accept,resolve)
>>>
VirtualLab.loadProblemSpecification: properties file=assignments/Walkthough.xml
http://www.dhba.com/wested/applet/assignments/Walkthough.xml not retrieved
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.io.FilePermission assignments/Walkthough.xml read)
My system:
Mac OSX10.6.4 with Firefox3.6.12 (Java Plug-in 1.6.0_22 Using JRE version 1.6.0_22-b04-307-10M3261 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM)

New in Kodo 3.3.3: Improved support for Java 5 enums and generics?

Hello,
Can anybody tell me if Kodo 3.3.3 can be deployed on WebLogic 8.1 sp4, jdk
1.4.1? The reason I ask this is because one of the features mentioned for
v3.3.3 is the support for Java 5 generics, which is available on WebLogic
9 -- but not in WebLogic 8.1 sp4. The documentation for Kodo 3.3.3 seems
to indicate that it can be deployed on WebLogic 8.1 -- can anyone tell me
if this is accurate?
Thanks for your help!

Correction:
I think that my question may have been misunderstood. What I want to know
is if Kodo 3.3.3 can be deployed on WebLogic 8.1sp4 which is running JDK
1.4 or do I have to deploy on a newer version of WebLogic that is running
Java 5?
Thanks!
Rita wrote:
I think that my question may have been misunderstood. What I want to know
is if Kodo 3.3.3 can be deployed on WebLogic 8.1sp4 which is running JDK
1.4 or do I have to deploy on a newer version of WebLogic that is running
Java 4?
Thanks!
Stephen Kim wrote:
Rita,
While Kodo 3.3.x can work with JDK 5, it cannot make WL work with JDK 5.
However, Kodo 3.4 RC 3 / 4.0 EA 2 both can work with WL 9 (which works
with JDK 5).
Rita wrote:
Hello,
Can anybody tell me if Kodo 3.3.3 can be deployed on WebLogic 8.1 sp4,
jdk
1.4.1? The reason I ask this is because one of the features mentionedfor
v3.3.3 is the support for Java 5 generics, which is available on WebLogic
9 -- but not in WebLogic 8.1 sp4. The documentation for Kodo 3.3.3 seems
to indicate that it can be deployed on WebLogic 8.1 -- can anyone tell me
if this is accurate?
Thanks for your help!
Steve Kim
[email protected]
SolarMetric Inc.
http://www.solarmetric.com

ALERT - Support for Java Critical Patch Update

ALERT - Support for Java Critical Patch Update
On October 15th, Java released a critical patch update (CPU) which will require download and upgrade to the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) release – 1.7.0_45. If upgrading the JRE to this release, the P6 module (also known as Web Access) of the P6 EPPM product line and the Contract Management product, which utilize LiveConnect applets in the browser, will start generating one or more prompts. To remediate these prompts for the P6 EPPM Web Access module and the Contract Management product, Oracle Primavera will be releasing fixpacks. Until fixpacks become available, you can use the following workaround to suppress these prompts: Select the 'Allow' Prompt or 'Yes' prompt for successful loading of applets. Note: This prompt will occur for each applet.
For more information, please refer to the following KM Documents in My Oracle Support.
For P6 (Web Access), refer to KM Document ID 1591925.1
For Contract Management, refer to KM Document ID 1592535.1

I found the answer to my own question. For any newbies out there, if you create an account with Oracle, that is not enough to download patches. You have to have an Oracle Customer Support Identifier associated with your account. Once you have a CSI that you obtain through your employer who has paid for support or through some other means, you then can go into My Oracle Support and enter a request to be added to the given CSI. That request goes into a pending state until the administrator of the CSI grants you privileges to download patches. (NOTE: You might have to bug someone within your organization to get this to happen.) For me, once I was given the privilege, the link worked as it should.

Toplink support for weblogic 9

Hi ,
Is toplink supported with weblogic 9?If yes,which version?
There is a thread(on OTN) that speaks about toplink support for weblogic 9.
Weblogic 9 -TopLink CMP
Thanks,
Rajbharat

Rajbharat,
We have completed our testing of POJO architectures and the WebLogic Support Matrix now reflects this:
Doug

Please tell me Card that support for Java Card 2.2.2

Hi Friends..
Please tell me Card that support for Java Card 2.2.2..
Thanks in advance..

Hi Sebastien_Lorquet..
Firstly, i'm so sorry if i'm mistaken and wrong.. i'm not mean to make you angry.. :(
sorry about this..
Yes, i've searched on google... and i think i'll buy it at NXP..
Thanks in advance Sir.. :)

Toplink support for JPA vs. Toplink Essentials

I think I read that Toplink has some support for EJB3/JPA as does Toplink Essentials.
What is the difference in features?
If one has a 10.1.3 app server license, should Toplink be used instead of Toplink Essentials for EJB3/JPA applications?
Does the Mapping Workbench produce JPA object-relational mapping annotations or XML?
Thank you.
Richard Catlin

Hi Robert,
I'm not sure which comments you were directing specifically to Dali vs. JDeveloper but I'll try and address them from a Dali perspective. I do want to point out that Dali is at 0.5 and so it is still under development.
yes you get a basic 1:1 entity from your databasetables...When generating Entities from tables, Dali will generate 1:1 and 1:many relationships based on database FK constraints.
@temporary annotations are not inserted if you have a Date oder Calendar type.Also when generating Entities from tables Dali will generate an instance variable of java.sql.Date for a database date column. java.sql.Date does not require an @Temporal annotation.
What's missing right now is a problem marker for missing @Temporal on java.util.Date and java.util.Calendar.
If you want to rename attributes or methods it's a lot of manual work to do... because >@Column annoations are not inserted, if they do not exist because of >dbname=attributenameThere is a bugzilla bug opened for this refactoring support. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=136333 Fortunately in Dali if you rename a class or attribute (field/getter) and your explicit or default mappings are broken you will get a problem marking on the attribute and in the Problems view so you can fix it rather than finding out at runtime.
generics are not inserted in the returnvalues of the methods...Generated Entities do use generics correctly e.g.:
public class Publisher implements Serializable {
     @OneToMany(mappedBy="publisher")
     private Set<Title> titles;
     public Set<Title> getTitles() {
          return this.titles;
     public void setTitles(Set<Title> titles) {
          this.titles = titles;
...--Shaun

Toplink support for DB2

I was wondering if anyone had any experiences with Toplink's support for DB2? If I have an existing application working with Oracle, is it easy to get the application working with a DB2 database or another DBMS such as SQL Server, etc.? Obviously, the different vendors have different conformities to the SQL syntax standard, and I was wondering if Toplink took these differences into account?
Thanks,
Ted

I don't know of any specific papers/docs on this.
The nature of TopLink is supporting any app server, any ide/toolset and any Database. For example, look in the source.zip file in your lib directory for TopLink... Notice there is a DB2Platform.java file in there. If there were any specific compatibility or idiosynchracies we hadn't accounted for (but we have), you could easily do so yourself just by modifying that class. We have cusotmers using dozens and dozens of different database variants just by using and modifying any of the Platform code provided...
- Don

Oracle To End Support for Java 7

No More Free Updates for Java 7 after April 2015
Users must sign long-term support deals or migrate to Java 8 to avoid 'enormous headache and disruption to millions of applications'
Public updates for Java 7 -- including bug and security fixes -- will end this month, a situation that one security advocate says could impact millions of applications.
"As outlined in the Oracle JDK [Java Development Kit] Support Roadmap, after April 2015, Oracle will not post further updates of Java SE [Standard Edition] 7 to its public download sites," Oracle's Java SE Support Roadmap states. "Customers who need continued access to critical bug fixes and security fixes as well as general maintenance for Java SE 7 or older versions can get long-term support through Oracle Java SE Support. The process of migrating users from Java 7 to Java 8 through the auto update feature is expected to take place after the January 2015 CPU release."
[ The art of programming is changing rapidly. We help you navigate what's hot in programming and what's going cold and give insights into the technologies that are changing how developers work. | Keep up with hot topics in app dev with InfoWorld's Application Development newsletter. ]
Oracle released Java SE 7 in July 2011; Java SE 8 was released in March 2014. Java, particularly on the client side, has been beset by security issues in recent years. But Oracle has taken many steps to address the issues and stressed that most of the problems dated back several years, before Oracle took over Java from Sun in 2010.
Still, the impact of Oracle's cessation of public updates could be severe, an official at security firm Waratek, believes. Oracle's "rapid" end-of-life schedule for Java versions is great for innovation and language evolution, Waratek CTO John Matthew Holt said in an emailed statement. "However, there is a dangerous tradeoff; now millions of Java 7 applications will have to defend themselves against code-level vulnerabilities without the benefit of future fixes." Holt advocates either upgrades to Java 8 or use of Java Run-time Application Self Protection (RASP) technologies (Waratek is a RASP vendor).
This week's security update from Oracle, meanwhile, marks the "proverbial 'end of the road' for Java 7 application security, Holt said. "After today, the only version of the Java Platform which will receive public security updates is Java 8. This is huge news, and it is going to cause enormous headache and disruption to millions of application owners around the world."
Contacted Tuesday afternoon for a comment on the end of public updates for Java SE 7, by late evening Oracle had not yet responded.
The April 2015 Critical Patch Update released Tuesday by Oracle provides 98 new fixes for security issues across a wide range of product families, said Eric Maurice in an Oracle blog post. These range from Oracle Database to Oracle Fusion Middleware, Java SE, and MySQL. Fourteen of the security fixes are for Java SE.

Java 7 has already been dead for quite a while. While you could still use it for Java apps on your system, Apple blocked its use in browsers long ago. You have to install version 8 if you need Java support for the web.

Support for Java Server FAce in Workshop

Dear All,
Does anyone have any idea if and when Workshop will include support for the Java
Server Faces (JSF) framework?
Thank you
Abe

While I cannot share any specific product plans from any vendor, I would like to point out that all of the vendors of IDEs in the Java web application space are members of the JSR-127 expert group that is defining JavaServer Faces. Indeed, one of the primary design goals for the APIs is to ensure that development tools have sufficient information available to create high quality user interfaces at design time, so we're doing all we can to enable this kind of thing.
As JavaServer Faces matures, I think you will be very pleased with the quality and quantity of tools support for it.
Craig McClanahan

Support for Java Activation Framework?

Hi,
Can anyone quickly tell me which version of JAF (java activation framework)in
WLS 7.0 ?
thanks a lot in advance
manoj

Hello Kumar,
Yes, these are part of HTTP 1.1 extensions. In case this is not currently supported, would really appreciate if you could let me know if it is planned in the future releases.
Regards,
Prasad Shetty
Kumar Allamraju <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
Are these extensions part of HTTP 1.1?
Prasad Shetty wrote:
Hi,
I need to use some headers defined in HTTP Extension Framework
(RFC 2274). Does Weblogic provide support for this extension
framework ? If so which version of Weblogic should i be using ?
Thanks & Regards,
Prasad Shetty
[att1.html]

Support for Java Server Faces

I hope that in the next future will appear, on the market, IDE (such as JBuilder) or authoring tool (as Deamweaver), that support the creation of jsp pages. A sort of RAD for jsp+tag library.
We expect such effort from software producer.
Thanks
Aldo Funicelli from Milan

While I cannot share any specific product plans from any vendor, I would like to point out that all of the vendors of IDEs in the Java web application space are members of the JSR-127 expert group that is defining JavaServer Faces. Indeed, one of the primary design goals for the APIs is to ensure that development tools have sufficient information available to create high quality user interfaces at design time, so we're doing all we can to enable this kind of thing.
As JavaServer Faces matures, I think you will be very pleased with the quality and quantity of tools support for it.
Craig McClanahan

TopLink support for JDO?

Hi,
I'm new to TopLink and am wondering what the status of JDO support is in 4.6. I can see that there is a JDO example, and that the RELNOTES indicate JDO support. But the level of spec compliance and JDO specific tools in TopLink are not documented AFAIK.

I finally found the javadocs in the TopLink 4.6 distribution. From these, plus from the examples, it seems to me that the TopLink JDO 1.0 support is partial.
They do provide partial implementations to most of the JDO interfaces in javax.jdo package. The one exception is javax.jdo.InstanceCallbacks. What I mean by partial is that some required methods are no-ops (no operation). No-ops do nothing and return null or zero depending on their return type.
They don't support the JDO query language. You can use their implementation of javax.jdo.Query to create a query using SQL, TopLink query language, or EJBQL.
They don't support the enhancer. The enhancer is controversial, therefore some people see this as a good thing.
I ran a little program to display the results of PersistenceManagerFactory.supportedOptions() for TopLink.
SUPPORTED OPTIONS
javax.jdo.option.NontransactionalRead
javax.jdo.option.ArrayList
javax.jdo.option.HashMap
javax.jdo.option.Hashtable
javax.jdo.option.LinkedList
javax.jdo.option.ArrayList
javax.jdo.option.TreeMap
javax.jdo.option.TreeSet
javax.jdo.option.Vector
javax.jdo.option.Map
javax.jdo.option.List
javax.jdo.option.Array
UNSUPPORTED OPTIONS
javax.jdo.query.JDOQL
javax.jdo.option.RestoreValues
javax.jdo.option.NullCollection
javax.jdo.option.NontransactionalWrite
javax.jdo.option.TransientTransactional
javax.jdo.option.RetainValues
javax.jdo.option.NonDatastoreIdentity
javax.jdo.option.Optimistic
javax.jdo.option.DatastoreIdentity
javax.jdo.option.ApplicationIdentity
I'm not sure why the javax.jdo.query.JDOQL option even exists. As I understand it support for the JDOQL is mandatory, not optional. But maybe this is a versioning thing. That is, maybe JDO 2.0 will allow implementations to provide JDOQL 1.0 and/or JDOQL 2.0. Just a guess.
Hope this helps.

TopLink support for version 2.0/2.1 of ejbql

Hello,
TopLink support ejbql for pojo finders.
What version of ejbql is supported in toplink 9.0.4.8 : 2.0 or 2.1 ?
What version of ejbql is supported in future release (10.1.3) of toplink : 2.0 or 2.1 ?
Regards

I believe the answer to both is 2.1.
Doug

Coroutines support for Java

Hello,
I've just published library that adds support
for Python-like coroutines to Java. You can see it at
http://code.google.com/p/coroutines .It'd be great if you found that useful. All comments and feedback are greatly appreciated. Thanks.

MarcinRzeznicki wrote:
endasil wrote:
MarcinRzeznicki wrote:
Hello,
I've just published library that adds support
for Python-like coroutines to Java. You can see it at
http://code.google.com/p/coroutines .It'd be great if you found that useful. All comments and feedback are greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Cool. How did you accomplish it? By encapsulating a method within a thread? I don't really want to go to your site at this moment.Hi
Not at all - I wrote Java instrumentation agent that makes the trick by transforming bytecode of original method to support coroutine semantics. Most of conceptual details are outlined on the site - check it out when you have time.Ahh, ok, so it's not so much a library as such. That's pretty cool, I'll take a look some time.

Toplink support for Java 5.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for