TopLink support for version 2.0/2.1 of ejbql

Hello,
TopLink support ejbql for pojo finders.
What version of ejbql is supported in toplink 9.0.4.8 : 2.0 or 2.1 ?
What version of ejbql is supported in future release (10.1.3) of toplink : 2.0 or 2.1 ?
Regards

I believe the answer to both is 2.1.
Doug

Similar Messages

  • Toplink support for weblogic 9

    Hi ,
    Is toplink supported with weblogic 9?If yes,which version?
    There is a thread(on OTN) that speaks about toplink support for weblogic 9.
    Weblogic 9 -TopLink CMP
    Thanks,
    Rajbharat

    Rajbharat,
    We have completed our testing of POJO architectures and the WebLogic Support Matrix now reflects this:
    Doug

  • When will Oracle end support for Version 7

    We have several servers running Oracle 7.3.4 and we are making upgrade plans.
    Could anyone tell us when support for version 7 will end.
    Thanks

    Java 7 has already been dead for quite a while. While you could still use it for Java apps on your system, Apple blocked its use in browsers long ago. You have to install version 8 if you need Java support for the web.

  • Until when give SAP support for version 7.30?

    Hello,
    Until when give SAP support for version 7.30?
    How is the update from SAP GUI 7.30 to 7.40 handle?

    Hello Herr Jürs,
    As per the attached note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/147519
    support ends in July
    SAP GUI for Windows Support Deadlines
    7.30: Full support up to July 15th, 2015. On July 15th, 2015 the used development environment Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 will transit to Microsoft's "Extended Maintenance" mode. This means that Microsoft will not create any corrections for components which belong to this development environment anymore (unless the issue is security relevant). Therefore no extension of full support for SAP GUI for Windows 7.30 beyond this date is possible.
    Regards,
    Jude

  • Toplink support for Java 5.0

    I tried to import java classes, compiled with jdk 5.0
    into Toplink workbench. The mapping fails.
    I tried to run the workbench with jre 5.0 but that didn't work either.
    Does anyone know how to do it and does Toplink even have a version that supports java 5.0?

    Anna,
    TopLink 10.1.3 will offer formal support for Java 5.0. Currently the runtime should work fine with Java 5.0. The only issue may be the workbench mapping process depending on the version of TopLink you are using.
    If you are using the 10.1.3 preview the workbench will still run with JDK 1.4 but should be compatible with importing and mapping classes compiled with JDK5. We will upgrade the JRE used by the workbench to JDK5 for the production release but this should not make any difference to your ability to map JDK 1.4 or 5 classes and use either at runtime.
    If you are using 9.0.4.X then the workbench will not be able to run or import JDK5 compiled classes. I believe the runtime is fine but not certified. For this environment you will need to compile the classes under JDK 1.4 and map this version of the classes. You can then use JDK5 compiled version in conjunction with the runtime.
    I hope this helps,
    Doug

  • TopLink support for JDO?

    Hi,
    I'm new to TopLink and am wondering what the status of JDO support is in 4.6. I can see that there is a JDO example, and that the RELNOTES indicate JDO support. But the level of spec compliance and JDO specific tools in TopLink are not documented AFAIK.

    I finally found the javadocs in the TopLink 4.6 distribution. From these, plus from the examples, it seems to me that the TopLink JDO 1.0 support is partial.
    They do provide partial implementations to most of the JDO interfaces in javax.jdo package. The one exception is javax.jdo.InstanceCallbacks. What I mean by partial is that some required methods are no-ops (no operation). No-ops do nothing and return null or zero depending on their return type.
    They don't support the JDO query language. You can use their implementation of javax.jdo.Query to create a query using SQL, TopLink query language, or EJBQL.
    They don't support the enhancer. The enhancer is controversial, therefore some people see this as a good thing.
    I ran a little program to display the results of PersistenceManagerFactory.supportedOptions() for TopLink.
    SUPPORTED OPTIONS
    javax.jdo.option.NontransactionalRead
    javax.jdo.option.ArrayList
    javax.jdo.option.HashMap
    javax.jdo.option.Hashtable
    javax.jdo.option.LinkedList
    javax.jdo.option.ArrayList
    javax.jdo.option.TreeMap
    javax.jdo.option.TreeSet
    javax.jdo.option.Vector
    javax.jdo.option.Map
    javax.jdo.option.List
    javax.jdo.option.Array
    UNSUPPORTED OPTIONS
    javax.jdo.query.JDOQL
    javax.jdo.option.RestoreValues
    javax.jdo.option.NullCollection
    javax.jdo.option.NontransactionalWrite
    javax.jdo.option.TransientTransactional
    javax.jdo.option.RetainValues
    javax.jdo.option.NonDatastoreIdentity
    javax.jdo.option.Optimistic
    javax.jdo.option.DatastoreIdentity
    javax.jdo.option.ApplicationIdentity
    I'm not sure why the javax.jdo.query.JDOQL option even exists. As I understand it support for the JDOQL is mandatory, not optional. But maybe this is a versioning thing. That is, maybe JDO 2.0 will allow implementations to provide JDOQL 1.0 and/or JDOQL 2.0. Just a guess.
    Hope this helps.

  • Toplink support for JPA vs. Toplink Essentials

    I think I read that Toplink has some support for EJB3/JPA as does Toplink Essentials.
    What is the difference in features?
    If one has a 10.1.3 app server license, should Toplink be used instead of Toplink Essentials for EJB3/JPA applications?
    Does the Mapping Workbench produce JPA object-relational mapping annotations or XML?
    Thank you.
    Richard Catlin

    Hi Robert,
    I'm not sure which comments you were directing specifically to Dali vs. JDeveloper but I'll try and address them from a Dali perspective. I do want to point out that Dali is at 0.5 and so it is still under development.
    yes you get a basic 1:1 entity from your databasetables...When generating Entities from tables, Dali will generate 1:1 and 1:many relationships based on database FK constraints.
    @temporary annotations are not inserted if you have a Date oder Calendar type.Also when generating Entities from tables Dali will generate an instance variable of java.sql.Date for a database date column. java.sql.Date does not require an @Temporal annotation.
    What's missing right now is a problem marker for missing @Temporal on java.util.Date and java.util.Calendar.
    If you want to rename attributes or methods it's a lot of manual work to do... because >@Column annoations are not inserted, if they do not exist because of >dbname=attributenameThere is a bugzilla bug opened for this refactoring support. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=136333 Fortunately in Dali if you rename a class or attribute (field/getter) and your explicit or default mappings are broken you will get a problem marking on the attribute and in the Problems view so you can fix it rather than finding out at runtime.
    generics are not inserted in the returnvalues of the methods...Generated Entities do use generics correctly e.g.:
    public class Publisher implements Serializable {
         @OneToMany(mappedBy="publisher")
         private Set<Title> titles;
         public Set<Title> getTitles() {
              return this.titles;
         public void setTitles(Set<Title> titles) {
              this.titles = titles;
    ...--Shaun                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • Toplink support for DB2

    I was wondering if anyone had any experiences with Toplink's support for DB2? If I have an existing application working with Oracle, is it easy to get the application working with a DB2 database or another DBMS such as SQL Server, etc.? Obviously, the different vendors have different conformities to the SQL syntax standard, and I was wondering if Toplink took these differences into account?
    Thanks,
    Ted

    I don't know of any specific papers/docs on this.
    The nature of TopLink is supporting any app server, any ide/toolset and any Database. For example, look in the source.zip file in your lib directory for TopLink... Notice there is a DB2Platform.java file in there. If there were any specific compatibility or idiosynchracies we hadn't accounted for (but we have), you could easily do so yourself just by modifying that class. We have cusotmers using dozens and dozens of different database variants just by using and modifying any of the Platform code provided...
    - Don

  • TopLink support for Stored Functions

    I know that TopLink supports PL/SQL stored procedures. What I haven't been able to figure out is whether or not TopLink also supports functions as well. Is there any way to execute a PL/SQL function using the TopLink APIs? Thanks. -Michael-

    You can find additional information (including examples of usage) on using Stored Functions in the TL Dev Guide: http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/toplink/1013/MAIN/_html/qrybas004.htm#BCFBBJBJ

  • Excel 2007 Support for versions prior to BPC 5.1

    Hi,
    Will versions prior to BPC 5.1 support Excel 2007?  Specifically 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2?
    Thanks,
    Mike Lantz

    4.0 & 4.1 would not have been tested and certified on 2007 as they were relased before Jan 2005.  As of 4.2 SP3 (released April 2006) the supported Excel versions are listed in the release notes as:
    Excel 2000 SR1 or later
    Excel 2002 (XP)
    Excel 2003 or later

  • Toplink support for RAC Failover

    We need to enable Toplink to support RAC Fast Connection Failover. We need to support
    only read query retry functionality and not write query retry. We found one document
    (http://www.oracle.com/technology/events/develop2007/presentations/oracle_jdbc_high_availability_load_balancing_best_practices_and_road_map.pdf)
    that explains how to configure JDBC connection for RAC failover. However, since we
    are using Toplink, we don't explicitly write our own jdbc url and toplink's session/uow
    will automatically handle the actual sql query execution.
    Is there any way we can configure Toplink to support RAC Fast Connection Failover, such
    as possibly in the toplink's sessions.xml or in the oc4j container's connection pools setting?
    Just for information, the way we acquire Toplink session is through SessionFactory:
       SessionFactory sessionFactory = new SessionFactory("repository",
                                     "META-INF/repository-sessions.xml");
       Session toplinkSession = sessionFactory.acquireSession();Then we do queries, acquiring unit of work, etc, using that toplinkSession.
    Thanks.

    We have enhanced our RAC FCF support in 11gR1 leveraging the new Universal Connection Pool to make it more seamless to the application. Which version of TopLink and OC4J are you using?
    Doug

  • Need info on support for version 8i.

    I need information on whether version 8i has gone out of support i.e. if security patches are being released for this version.
    Thanks

    Perhaps this might help you: http://www.itweek.co.uk/itweek/news/2085229/oracle-extends-8i-support
    Dim

  • Curve 8330m Support for Version 5 Software?

    Does anyone know if version 5 or newer software is planned to be released for the Curve 8330m?  My carrier (a regional Carrier in Idaho called Inland Cellular) tells me this phone is end of Life and the latest software I can run is 4.5.0.186 and no new software will be released by RIM.  Is this truly the case?  Or is there a way to get version 5 on this Blackberry? 
    Jim

    Apparently not.
    KB17984 BlackBerry® Smartphones that support an upgrade to BlackBerry® Device Software 5.0
    1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
    2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
    3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
    4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
    Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
    BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • Toplink support for SQL Server 2005 on Websphere 6.1

    Hi,
    We are using toplink in our application, it works fine when we use it with weblogic & SQL server or WAS 6.1 with Oracle or DB2. But when we use it with WAS 6.1 and SQL Server 2k5, it just does not work. It takes up all the connections in the pool and never returns it and starts giving connection time out errors.
    Internal Exception: com.ibm.websphere.ce.cm.ConnectionWaitTimeoutException: Connection not available, Timed out waiting for 100005Error Code: 0
    Thanks

    This sounds like a WebSphere connection pool issue, I'm not sure why WebSphere would not work with SQL Server.
    You could try using TopLink's internal connection pooling instead.
    EclipseLink : http://www.eclipselink.org

  • Toplink support for stored procedure with 2 OUT  REF CURSOR ?

    Can Toplink StoredProcedureCall be used with Oracle PLSql procedure with 2 OUT parameters. Parameter type is Ref Cursor (Oracle PLSQL resulset)
    Regards

    In a TopLink StoredProcedureCall using an OUT CURSOR the cursor is assumed to map to the result set for the TopLink query.
    For example if you had a stored procedure READ_ALL_EMP that returned a out cursor of EMP rows, you could use that procedure in a TopLink mapped Employee class mapped to the EMP table and use the stored procedure in a ReadAllQuery for the Employee class.
    If the procedure does not return data that maps to objects, you can use a DataReadQuery to access the data. The out cursor would be returned as a Vector of DatabaseRows that contain the data from the cursor rows.
    If the procedures data is complex and does not map to objects, it may be better to access the procedure directly through JDBC.

Maybe you are looking for