Trading goods Purchase

Dear SAP Gurus,
For trading material tax procedure needs to be creater for no exicisable. or any option for show trading material is having nill tax. but basically we are declaring material as a excisable.
Vinod

Hi Nilesh,
You can either go for pricing schema or modify the existing schema. If you are going for modifiying existing pricing schema, create one more set of condition types which you need to inventorise (excise conditions like cvd aed etc.) and add them in appropriate places in pricing procedure. And make these condition types as non-deductable.. (similar to BCD). In case the excise conditions need to be inventorised, condition value have to entered against these condition types.
Ensure that at GR and Invoice Verification stage these conditions values are properly posted, if not use available use-exits in CN to control these condition types.
Regards,
Rajesh

Similar Messages

Import execisable trading goods purchase for depot

Dear gurus,
In one of my clients scenario, I have to purchase imported execiasable material from foreign vendor with all the seven excise duties viz CVD,AED,ECS,SCESS, BCD and ECEss and HSECess on BCD.But interesting thing is that he want to inventorised all the excise duties for traded materials .For general import purchase we use ZIMPORT prising and in that only customs duties get inventorised and other CVD,AED,ECS,SCESS duties gets refunded,hence non inventorised.
My client wants all CVD,AED,ECS,SCESS duties to be posted in respctive excise register for depot and at the same time all the 7 import duties to be inventorised as they are not getting any setoff for that. IF we use same import prising procedure for depot as like that of manufacturing plant, as i said only BCD and ECEss and HSECess on BCD will get inventorised.
Shall i need to design new prising for depot or new conditions for same import prising?
Kindly help.

Hi Nilesh,
You can either go for pricing schema or modify the existing schema. If you are going for modifiying existing pricing schema, create one more set of condition types which you need to inventorise (excise conditions like cvd aed etc.) and add them in appropriate places in pricing procedure. And make these condition types as non-deductable.. (similar to BCD). In case the excise conditions need to be inventorised, condition value have to entered against these condition types.
Ensure that at GR and Invoice Verification stage these conditions values are properly posted, if not use available use-exits in CN to control these condition types.
Regards,
Rajesh

GR for Purchase Order for Trading Goods

Hi,
I have a query on configuration for accounting entry for purchase orders for Trading goods.
When i do the GR for Purchase order for a trading good, the accounting entries are,
Inventory Dr
GR/IR Cr
and
Purchase Expenses Dr
Purchase Setoff Cr
I understand that i can configure for the first set of posting in BSX and WRX. How do i configure for the Purchase Expenses and Purchase Setoff.
Please advise and correct my understanding.
Thanks in Advance,
Safi

Hi,
The possiblity for this scenario is
First create the Production order in CO01
Create of Account assinged PO in ME21N with Account assigned category as "F" with Production order
Do the MIGO with respect to PO, then system will directly post the Stock to that Production order.
So in the system GR is done for PO & Goods issue is done for Production order.In this way you can acheive this.
rgds
GSC

COPA : Cost of sales for trading goods

Dear friends
We activated cost based accounting and made setting in "Define Access to Standard Cost Estimates" to transafer standard cost of material to copa. We have to transfer Variable and fixed part of the standard cost to COPA, to two diffrenct Value fields
And it is woking fine
But when we sell, any purchased goods (having price control V) system asking for standard cost of the purchased goods. Then we are running Standard cost run for that material and we are able to sell the goods.
Please speciy the above procedure is correct, any other procedure is available.
The problem I am facing is suppor today I run standrd cost run for a trading goods and sold the same, today for that material MAP and standard cost is same.
After some time the MAP of that same material is changed and if we sell the that goods, old standard cost of that material will go to copa
How to solve this probelm.
Regards
Bala

For the purchased products, you may perhaps use the condition type VPRS to bring in the material price from the material master.

Trading Goods & Finished Products

Hi
While creating new material we have to give the the material type and as per this the screen will display.I want to know what is the difference between Finished Product and Trading goods in material type.Can anyone give some example of materials/ products which will come under these two material types?
regards
jyoti

Hi Jyothi,
Difference between Trading goods and Finished products.
Trading goods:- Trading goods means company will not manufacture those goods they will purchase the goode from the vedor then they will supply to the cistomer.(thses also can be finished products but not manufactured by the company).
Here production will not takes place so no need to maintain production planning data in the material master.
Supply will happen in two ways,
1.First Company will take the delivery from vendor after that company will deliver the goods to the customer(Individual purcahse order).
2.Company will instuct the vendor to supply the goods directly to the customer.(Third party process).
Finished products :- Which are the products produced or manfacured in the company premises itself.
Here production will takes place so need to maintain production planning data in the material master.
So according to that system will allow the fields in the material master.
I hope it will clear for you,
Regards,
Murali.

Trading goods Scenarios (import & export).

Hi experts
Can anybody explain me about the how to import & export trading goods.
1.What are all steps to be followed for import and export trade goods in SAP.
2.Please help me with transaction, like
ME51N,ME21N,...ETC.
Good solution wil be rewarded wit maxium points.
Thanks
sap-mm

Dealer case mapping in SAP
If you are using taxinn then in Fv11 you have to maintain excise conditions( BED,ECESS and HECESS) =zero insted of 16 , 2 and 1% and setoff conditions =100% and VAT conditions as per actual percentage for example 4% or 12%
In purchase order
Say Your Price is 100
BED=0
ECESS=0
HECESS=0
VAT 4%
Total will be 104
Now at the time of GR you will come to know the actual % is different .and total base value is 80/-
Put the excesi base as mentioned in excise gate pass(80/-e.g)
Do not forget to tick MRP indicator on miscenious tab
Save your part 1 and post the GR
also post part 2
Then at the time of MIRO you wiill have base value as 100 ( original from PO) so change this value as per excise gate pass that is 80/-
and press calculate tax. You will get the desired result.
Regards
Kedar Kulkarni

COGS for Trading Goods

Hi All,
My client is following Non valuated Sale order Costing where COPA is activated.
In the above scenario, cost and Revenue will flow to COPA when Sale order item is settled to COPA.
How about the cost of Trading materials. material are purchased and sold to the customers without any processing.
During PGI, the entry would be COGS a/c Dr
Inventory -trading material a/c Cr
Now i have created COGS as cost element of category 1. During PGI, system is asking for a cost object assignment. But If i assign Cost center in OKB9, i think cost will be posted twice in CO ,ie in Cost center and COPA. Is it correct.
Pls clarify me on this, as I wanted cost to be shown against the revenue in COPA for Trading materials.
2. Discount to customers, is created under CE 12 category. Will this have any impact on FI when discount is given for any sale which is done from FI.
Thanks,
Ravi

Hi,
Thanks everyone for your replies.
1. Trading material are procured , i e for catering to the customer order and also procured to stock and then sale wen customer order comes in.
Hence, I am not following MTO scenario for trading goods. Can you pls let me know how to handle both so that ultimately my cost should flow to COPA with Revenue.
As told, COGS is brought through either Stand cost estimate or VPRS. In our case its through setttlement of Sale order.
For trading materials, it should be through VPRS.
Thanks,
Ravi.

How the Trading Goods mapped in to Product costing and COPA in Controlling

Dear Experts,
I have a trading goods scenario in my client. How the mapping into Product Costing and COPA.
They just purchase FG products from Vendors and Sell to their Customers, they received FG Products to Main Plant from Vendors and then sends to Branches from Main Plant, In between some expenses accured like Transport, Fright etc. this is my scenario.
How the settings to be made in Product costing and COPA.
I am waiting for your favorable reply.
Thanks,
KBR.

Hi Bhaskar
I believe branches are also created as Plants
You have 2 choices....
Choice 1: If the Freight amount is known @ the time of Transfer from Main plant to Branches, include the same in STO so that inventory value in Branch = Purchase Value + Freight amount
CHoice 2: If thats not possible, then inventory value in Branch will be same as the Main plant... The expenses incurred on freight needs to be posted to a cost center... Then allocate them @ month end based on revenue / Quantity sold etc using KEU5
Whichever choice you make, Product Costing is not relevant and required as well... You dont need to do any CK11N
If you want to see in COPA Purchase value separate and the Freight, etc separate - Then choice 2 is the route for you
br, Ajay M

Trading Goods

Dear Experts,
We have a business scenario where in we purchase a case of 8 units quantity and we break the packing and repack into each case of 3 quantity, we are using different materials codes for both the materials under the same material type HAWA.
The issue is both the materials belong to the same material type and business is not ready to use the procuring 8 quantity case as raw material. The packing charges and labour charges has to be charged to the product not to any cost object.
Is there anyway to address this scenario in SAP without creating the BOM
With Regards
Uday

Hi Stephen,
I am explaining the complete scenario.
Creation of purchase order for 8 unit case(8 unit case config) with material X(HAWA material type)
GRN preparation
Break the 8 piece pack and repack to 3 piece pack this( 3 piece case config)(HAWA Material type only)
Requirement is this 3pc pack charges(labour and packing charges) to be charged to the product only without charging to any cost object.
At present we are doing it manually by preparing the physical inventory document (Mi01) and by posting the manual financial entry which is not acceptable.
We are using product costing for normal production with make to order for exports and repetitive manufacturing for with in country sales.
This trading goods issue to be addressed without charging the cost to any cost center or cost object.
Please explore like capturing the cost on PCC and settling it to material. I tried this scenario but I could not able to confirm the PCC so system will not update the cost to the product
With Regards
Uday

CIN-Pricing Procedure for Trading Goods

Hi Gurus
Need yr expertise... Currently we have trading goods process which do not require any excise duties but VAT or CST is required.. Could you pls advise what will be the best pricing procedure to be used as the proposed pricing procedure by SAP (JFACT or JDEPOT) cannot be used as it will propose excise invoice?
If we do not maintain any excise duties in J1ID, system will not prpose any excise duties if we were to use either of the suggested pricing procedure but we will hit a warning message that excise duties are missing in J1ID..
How can we avoid this and what will be the best pricing procedure which do not require excise duties but sales tax is required?
Rgds..Vinz

Hi Vinz,
you can make your won pricing proced.
e.g. ZMKTPRICE
here you can use your regular condition type what you have defined.
e.g PR00-Sale Price
K007-Discount
MWST= 4% or 12.5 (PR00-K007).
I think this will help you.
Best Regards
Sainath

Free goods-purchase order

can some one plz explain me process of free goods purchases.
we want to keep this free goods acceptance in one of my purchasing doc type.
plz send me complete data with configuration steps.

Hello,
Free Goods PO can be created manually by checking the check box in Item Overview screen in ME21N. Goods Receipt can be carried out using MIGO or programmatically by BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE. Invoice receipt is not applicable for Free Goods PO.
Also, Free Goods determination can be automated by Free Goods Condition records for Condition type NR00. As mentioned above, this can be carried out using MBN1. By standard, this can setup at Vendor/Article level or Vendor/Site/Article level.
Thanks,
Venu

Trading goods in MM

Dear Gurus
Kindly suggest me what Item category and account assignment category will be used for Procurement of trading goods
Thanx
MK

hi
Only u have create th material with HAWA type.
Then do normal Po , noneed of ASC and IC in PO.
Thanks

GRPO instead of CAPE in case of capital goods purchase

Hi,
I have configured the capital goods purchase with excise. Which transaction type is to be captured .. GRPO or CAPE.
At present GRPO is captured..
I have used a material 'ASSET' just for reference and in J1ID it is assigned to a chapter ID, then maintained as input material.
and just used it.
If CAPE is correct method,.. how to achieve this..
Sujith

Hi All,
The asset cost is 10000
Excise :
BED 10%       1000
ECS 2%         20
SECS 1%       10
VAT 4+1
Is the following correct:
1. MIGO for asset : 'No excise invoice' chosen / No accounting document generated.
2. No J1IEX
3. MIRO following a/c entries occurs
Vendor                                                                11,475.61-
BUILDINGS                                                                           11,030.00
INPUT TAX RECOVERIES CAPITAL GOODS - VAT @ 4%     441.20
SS CESS @ 1% ON INPUT TAX RECOVERIES          4.41
It seems correct .. Thanks everyone ..
Thanks
Sujith
Edited by: Sujithbk on Oct 19, 2011 9:54 AM

India: Customer consignment with trading goods

Dear all,
we need to implement customer consignment process with trading goods on a depot in India.
But I am lacking understanding how the process works with SAP:
Step 1) consignment fill-up:
We do goods issue, then J1IJ and then a create a proforma invoice. This invoice holding the RG23D entries goes along with the goods to the consignment location. But it is not relevant for payment towards the consignment customer as I have learned.
2) Consignment issue: When we do a consignment issue, how do we get the correct tax amounts into our invoice (BED, CESS, SeCess)? I am told that the excise is only billed to the consignment customer for the actual consumed quantity. This would be with the invoice for the consignment issue. But the pricing procedure does not pick up the partial excise values from RG23D as we do not create any excise invoice for consignment issue, but only SD invoice. So how to get the correct values in the excise conditions?
Can anybody explain to me how this scenario can be handled in SAP without entering condition values manually in the invoice?

Dear tortyv,
As per my understanding of the requirement,
You please check the "VL06" report if it satisfies your requirement you enter the execution parameters and execute.
System will give the list of out bound deliveries. Select one of those and click the details icon (ctrlshiftf3) according to the item view or headder view.
If it does't suit you have to go for z report.
I f you want that please provide the input fields in order to fetch the required data for the report.
Thanks&Regards
Raghu.k

RE: Difference between Trading Goods and Finished Goods

What is the difference between a trading good and a finished good?
My business contracts the manufacturing of surfboard to third party manufacturers. We then distribute the surfboards out as our product to customers. Would you describe our surfboards as a trading good or a finished good?
Thanks

First of all, I am not sure which is the right forum for this question
Coming to your query, a trading goods can be a finished goods or semi finished goods but not all finished goods can be treated as a trading goods. Hope you got the difference.
From manufacturers point of view, whatever they produce and sell, it can be treated as a finished goods. Whatever they procure and sell, that can be treated as a trading goods.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Trading goods Purchase

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for